Politics Debate Topics — page 61
3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 3001.
Transgender people should use bathrooms matching their identity
For
- This has been happening for a long time, its just now that the news started to blow up with it. Mainly people have been talking about males going into the female restrooms. But what if a transgender guy wants to go into the men's restroom? He most likely isn't going to get…
- There's an article pointing out how baseless these rape accusations and an FBI report that 0 rapes have occurred in this context conservatives are pushing forward. The same article points out that bathtubs kill 340 people a year, shopping on black Friday kills 550 people a…
Against
- You haven't responded to the fact that I debunked your past claims. You can't just go into a debate with pure emotion and make up random facts, you must back it up with evidence. Anyways, to start, you said this has been happening for a long time. All of the women that were…
- I'm going to debunk that right now. To start, your claim that many counties don't have gender separated bathrooms is a fallacy. This is false, and the research has been done. I've looked into this and found no evidence to support that claim. Next your incredibly false and…
- 3002.
Bernie Sanders' policies will not benefit the country
For
- 1. Campaign Finance Reform: This goal is as idealistic as it is pathetic. Congress will never pass such a law. Con has not provided any evidence supporting the notion that this would ever happen. https://represent.us... Here are some studies indication that Congress does not…
- Ideology-Bernie Sanders has proclaimed himself a socialist. He has ran on the idea of increasing taxes on the rich, and giving to the poor. This is not only completely unnecessary, but has a lot of unintended consequences. Competition- If my opponent believes in this ideal, and…
Against
- I guess there's not much left for me to refute here. Allow me a moment to summarize both sides of the debate for our readers and potential voters: Round 1. Pro claims he will attack Sanders' policies. Then mistakenly cites the wrong number of rounds of the Debate. (This, the…
- My opponent has started this debate with claims to attack the policies of Senator Sanders, yet spends the majority of his first argument advocating for free market capitalism, with only passing mention of "Socialism". Also, I find your reliance on wikipedia quite humorous.…
- 3003.
Feminism does more harm than good
For
- I should rename the debate "Feminism is Bad" lets just consider that the title, ok. first off women have achieved equality in every way 1. equal pay https://www.eeoc.gov... and https://www.forbes.com... 2. feminists will bring up "catcalling" but catcallers are looked down…
- you said OMG, Really? Violence is bad in both cases, but look: https://www.huffingtonpost.com... The percentage are horrible." well a study found this out, "Roughly 40 percent of the victims of severe physical violence were men." https://www.yahoo.com... and…
Against
- The feminism is necessary, because the woman has always been despised by the society. It wouldn't be necessary if people stop belittling the figure of the woman, but this never happened, and It will never happened with closed mindsets. That's why you need one, two, three waves,…
- Yes, because to consider that feminist is bad will make the percentage of equality rise, of course ( sarcasm) The woman have achieved A PART of equality, but totally? No men. 1. Yes, equal pay... ". https://www.forbes.com... and https://www.aauw.org... 2. The thing is to know…
- 3004.
Secret societies like the Illuminati shape American politics
For
- Love
- Such is life.
Against
- i have no idea what to say
- 3005.
The word God should be removed from government symbols and pledges
For
- Well you may think "that children now days do not learn who he really is except in the church and Bible" but I might think that children don't really learn who they are unless they pray to a Banana. That is your opinion.It is your right to have your opinion as it is my right to…
- there should not be any mentioning of the word god when it comes to government. this is not one nation under god becaue i do not believe in god yet i am apart of this nation that i was born in. i herd that originally there was never any mentioning of god and that it was placed…
Against
- I here by find that the word god should be placed on the dollar bill and in the schools and the Pledge of Allegience as a tool of learning I think that children now days do not learn who he really is except in the church and Bible. I find that most American people when asked if…
- In conclusion I still fail to see your logic in taking the word god out of everything pertaining to the governnent and the dollar bill. You being Atheist has no bearing to why we have the word god on the dollar bill.If it is just a word why should it offend you if it is on the…
- 3006.
Donald Trump is not a white supremacist
For
- Exactly. He is not white, He is orange. Therefore, He cannot be a white supremacist. He is an orange supremacist.
- Donald Trump is NOT a white supremacist.
Against
- Hey! We are obviously in agreement. It must be a draw. Regards.
- I think he would be if he could be. Having said that. I think a lot of people would be if they could be. But it's no longer de rigueur. Especially for the leader of the Free World. What ever that might mean. Tolerance is the buzz word. But tolerance is always on a knifes edge.…
- 3007.
Barack Obama's policies were good for America
For
- Most people who know me on this site know that I use an I-phone and I-pod for most of these posts. Since I am not afforded the luxury of Microsoft when I am at work, it is an issue that I work with. I would like to point out the irony of you calling me out with grammar errors…
- I would like to say alot of his arguments is based off of opinions. As you can see he provided a link to 200 reasons not to vote for Obama. We all are aware this is merely is opinions as to why not to vote to them, and he back none of these up with factsAlso I would like to…
Against
- First of all Mikal, check both your grammar and spelling. I felt like I needed to use some foreign power to decipher your first 3 sentences. Second, I pointed out each thing I felt Obama should fix and be recognized as a moron for. You told me that I showed over 200 reasons not…
- While I see Obama has done something or other, I don't believe he is actually the president because we wants to fix us. He's whittled the middle class and low class citizens of the US into rocks for house. Heck, Obama made it possible for people to live inside their cars. Look,…
- 3008.
Same-sex marriage should not be legal
For
- I will bear this in mind when I use it in a real debate. Vote my opponent.
- My proposal:Currently, in 'marital' life a person can have 3 statuses. Married, single, or in a civil partnership (which before the laws were passed was legal for the LGBTQ community). The word 'marriage' started with only religious origins, and has begun to be recognised by…
Against
- Your proposal of having a religious marriage and a civil marriage is extremely well thought-through and reasonable; however, you are not the commander of the universe, as in you are mostly powerless to do anything do change the marriage laws. This particular debate is about the…
- Firstly, gay (and lesbian) people have the right to get married because, quite frankly, they're humans too. If "straight" people are allowed to get married, so can gay people. If I put it out there plainly, marriage is not a religious ritual. Some might argue that marriage is…
- 3009.
Another revolutionary war will occur in the United States
For
- First, welcome to the debate, if this is indeed one, for as I see it you have presented no argument against my premise at all. In any case let me address a few of your points, then I will move on. 1.) Rebuttal: Impossible. The U.S. constitution was drafted in 1787, signed in…
- The answer, of course, is yes. But why do I believe this? Because history repeats itself, and that is exactly what is going on today as we speak. Let me explain further. You see, in 1775, Great Britain decided to implement a thing called the Stamp Act, which many Americans at…
Against
- Opponent forfeits.
- All arguments extended into final round.
- 3010.
Military action against Iran is justified
For
- George Bush is a moron. But be that as it may, he was correct in stating that Iran was a member of the Axis of Evil. The sanctions we have against Iran are insufficient and for the following 3 reasons, we should begin military action in Iran to overthrow the existing regime. 1.…
- mmm so Im not the only one taking on one too many debates. Alas, I guess it's now time to invade Iran.
Against
- Much of my insight comes from personal and professional relationships with the former white house adviser on middle eastern foreign policy, my former boss, the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and several other high profile tutors. I will start by responding to…
- 3011.
The United States should ban all private gun ownership
For
- Remember that this is about the debate, and the debate space should be safe for everyone. This means no personal attacks, only attacks on the arguments. Thank you!
- I will begin with my case, then move on to my opponent's case. First, extend my framework. The purpose of the debate is to determine what is moral, and the best way to determine what is moral is to determine what best protects life. Any argument not relating to the protection…
Against
- To everyone who is reading this, you should think reasonably. Guns are not the only source of violence. Even if guns were banned, crazy people can still get access to other weapons to but other people. My opponent's idea of a completely peaceful world will not happen even after…
- In my opponent's first argument, it was mentioned that guns are dangerous. That is not true at all. Guns are not the ones to be blamed for mass shootings, but the people who are using the guns. My opponent mentioned in some states, the murder rate dropped after guns were…
- 3012.
Going to war with Iran serves the interests of the United States
For
- Ah ceteris paribus, my old enemy. Of course all other things aren't equal as you've pointed out. Not only would a war be good for our economy, but it'd help us in other ways as well. A) We would have to pull out of Iraq. I think at this point it's generally agreed that we…
- "So if the economy is what is in the best interest of the United States, then the only way to fix it is by going to war?" Of course not! Did I say that? It doesn't seem like the sort of thing I'd say... Anyways, no, going to war is not the only way to fix the economy. However…
Against
- "However since we're in agreement that the US economy is vital to it's best interest, and since wars are great for a good economic kick start then it logically follows that going to war is in our best interest." That argument would make sense, except you have a basic flaw in…
- I fail to mention what is in the best interest of the United States because I thought that avoiding those downfalls I mentioned in my previous argument would go without saying as what is best for the United States. So if the economy is what is in the best interest of the United…
- 3013.
Immigrants who cannot speak English should not gain citizenship
For
- I think it would be in your best interest to look back and actually read what i've written. Withholding citizenship should not be a problem. With this new plan those in need would be able to enter the country and live here for a period of months before being granted…
- Government encouraging English lessons is already going on. There are night schools which take place in public schools where they teach English to those who are new to the country, guess how many people go? Not many. If it is not required they will not learn. If public school…
Against
- All arguments extended.
- My opponent's metaphor is that visitors to his house can't move the furniture around. New citizens are not visitors, though. They are new habitants of his house, who live there too, and maybe they do have equal rights to shift the furniture around to suit them. That's the whole…
- 3014.
Russia and Turkey could go to war
For
- Well then there is China because they have one of the biggest armed, navy and air forces. If they do manage to ally with Russia in this along with other countries then it is possible for Turkey to struggle in this. But yes there will be tension with the EU and NATO! Also it…
- You may be right about Russia's show of power but you have to admit that Russia does have a great strength and could you imagine if some of other big world powers as big as Russia like China and a few others, this could lead to some war between Russia and Russian allies against…
Against
- Okay, first of all the U.S. defense budget is equal to the next top 10 defense budgets combined. If the U.S. becomes involved then Russia has nearly no chance of effectively taking control Turkey. Plus China is unlikely to side with Russia as they still hold a grudge from…
- Regardless of tension within the EU the majority of the European Union would fight against an expansionist Russia regardless of their relations with Turkey. This would force the members with pro Russia leanings to declare that they would stand with Russia against the EU which I…
- 3015.
LGBTQ organizations should be recognized as legitimate
For
- First your opening statement 100% contradicts your first argument when you said you have no problem with homosexuality. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe you said that it was natural. So if liking guys when your a guy is natural, then what makes wanting to be a…
- Unnatural? Not sure if you read my lat argument, but I made sure to state that thousands of people are being born transgender with two different reproductive organs. It is not a disease it in no way impairs you. Also to re iterate as much as it may seem like a choice and I…
Against
- Transgender isnt a problem in itself. LGBTQ is making it a problem. These idiots are making children undergo hormone therapies which increase suicide rates so much, hospitals are refusing to go through with that. Also, I dont give a damn what gender one believes they are, you…
- Homosexuality is natural, I have nothing against it. Many other animals have homosexual tendencies. But transsexualism is ridiculous. Its mental illness called Gender Dysphoria. Its impossible to be born in a "wrong body". Gender is defined by your reproductive organs, not your…
- 3016.
Barack Obama was the most honorable president in fifty years
For
- We cannot blame our president for the misconduct of some of his employees. Concerning President Reagan, he has been credited with allowing Pakistan to build a nuclear bomb, as well as with the creation of al-Qaeda. Another incident damaging his reputation was the sale of…
- After winning his reelection, President Obama can be considered the most honorable president since the assassination of President Kennedy. President Obama, unlike most of his predecessors, has been able to distance himself from political scandals, corruption, love affairs,…
Against
- It has been a pleasure. Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited this round. I would like to think that he was just busy with the holidays, but who really knows. In this round I would like to summarize 3 key points of this debate and show you why they all lead to a vote for the…
- In this round I would like to first respond to my opponent's case and then move on to reinforce my own. My opponent stated that we are experiencing the construction of the best democracy around the world. This is flat out false. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit's…
- 3017.
The United States should require background checks for all gun sales
For
- Read the beginning of round 2.Vote positive!
- In this round, I will instruct my oppenent to reread my argument, as it is evident, from his rebuttals, that he has not comprehended them.Parte UnoBackground Checks Are, Indeed, Effective.Partito UnoThis argument is based on how the black market is rampant, but the logic of…
Against
- Before I conclude my arguments, I'd like to point out to those judging this debate that the affirmative's conduct is substandard. His refutations resort to false paraphrasing of the negative's arguments and aimless sourcethrowing without proper explanation of the content that…
- I remind both my opponent and those who are judging this debate that all rebuttals and points are directed at the opposing stance, not at the opposition themselves. In this round, I will attack the overarching arguments presented by my opponent before reinforcing the ground…
- 3018.
Obama's lies were more consequential than Trump's
For
- I would summarize my opponent"s post to the following points: 1) Smiles introduces an interesting concept of "relative forgivability". And the criteria offered are motive, deliberation, acknowledgement, amendment and harm. 2) Based on the above criteria, Smiles concludes that…
- Major US media properties like New York Times, Washington Post, CNN etc. keep telling us that Trump is a liar. For example, NYT has a webpage titled "President Trump's Lies, the Definitive List". Yet, the lies of Trump are trifling in comparison to those of Obama. Trump lied…
Against
- Thanks Realist2016- Please note, the notion of forgiveness ought not to be misconstrued as a reframing of the debate or tangential to question of consequentiaity. Rather, I am addressing Pro"s use of the comparative "big" (i.e. Trump"s the bigger liar) which is inclusive of…
- Thanks, realist2016. Everybody lies and so all politicians are liars to some degree. I"ll advance that the relative forgivability of a political lie can be judged by the following characteristics: MOTIVE: Who benefits by concealing the truth? Was the lie self-serving or…
- 3019.
Welfare benefits for single parents should be reduced
For
- Thank you for accepting this challenge, fresnoinvasion (curious nom de plume, b/t/w, did you invade Fresno? Was there much resistance?) I should like to make it clear that my scenario was not an attack on women called Trisha - it is a very nice name, very nice indeed…
- Say you have a neighbour, who has an eighteen year-old daughter called Trisha. Now, please don't get too excited boys, she's very overweight and distinctly unattractive. Also, she has personal hygiene issues. And she's rude and she's foul-mouthed and she's ignorant and she's…
Against
- Line by line. 1. Youre welcome. Brian Eggleston. 2. No, I totally agree. DOWN WITH TRISHAS!!.. Along with those who allow sarcasm to fly over their head. Group the rest. Yes, it is an attack on the lower class.. Although you may believe some (most) cases are worthy of welfare,…
- "Say you have a neighbour..." No, i dont have a neighbor named Trisha. Trisha is my mother. Haha In all seriousness (and due respect), this scenario should not even be read. Any scenario can be brought up in order to twist the topic into the favor of the individual making the…
- 3020.
Gun restrictions would be ineffective at reducing violence
For
- It's alright :-) I can always re-issue it. Gun laws simply would not work. In fact, most terrorists seize their guns illegally, so laws wouldn't help with that. Many people seem to think that guns are the only way to murder these days. They are definitely one of the most…
- I'm looking for someone to debate with from the COMMENTS SECTION. First round is JUST FOR ACCEPTANCE. I am Pro, which means that I think that gun laws wouldn't work. Rules: 1: No Trolling 2: No Forfeit 3: No Swearing or Rude Remarks 4: No Kritiks 5: No Plagiarism Let's debate!
Against
- I agree with your statement about terrorists seizing their weapons illegally, but why not make it more difficult to obtain a gun in the first place? This would make America a potentially smarter and safer community. Terrorists main goal is to invoke terror amongst groups of…
- I wasn't from the comments section, yikes. I accept the challenge and ask the pro-position one question; why do you think gun restrictions would be ineffective?
- 3021.
Arguments against gun control lack a solid basis
For
- Impressive round, I'm impressed. 1) I was not off topic, it was supplementary for my argument. 2) In what universe do you believe no one will do a thing to prevent the further dissolve of America into a chaos state? 3) The domestic terrorist/AK47 argument you present is in no…
- "Taking guns away from the law-abiding population takes away their ability to defend themselves from those who disregard gun bans, therefore increasing crime rather than decreasing it."I, in no way, will agree with removing all guns from all citizens -- all I'm saying is that…
Against
- 1. My opponent's points on gun control would have been supplementary for his argument, if he made an argument to go with it. Since he didn't, I have to call it a concession.2. Not speaking for myself here, but Anti-Gun Control have beliefs that include a state of chaos…
- "all I'm saying is that for current gun purchases, we should have limits on what kind of guns should be purchased,"That was not defined in the resolution. When my opponent's brings up what he specifically means on gun control after I made an argument of my own, that's called…
- 3022.
Promoting democracy worldwide should take priority over national sovereignty
For
- My opponent has said in his last speech that "Sovereignty as a principle does not instantly equate bad. It simply means that some group has lawmaking authority." This definition that CON has given leaves out a key part of sovereignty. The sovereign does not simply have…
- ** "There is a definition [of sovereignty] of which most subsequent definitions are a variant: supreme authority within a territory. This definition highlights an important aspect of the concept. A holder of sovereignty possesses authority. Authority is "the right to command…
Against
- I concede the debate to my opponent.
- I thank Nails for his arguments and wish us both good fortune in the tournament. Arguments: Sovereignty as a principle does not instantly equate bad. It simply means that some group has lawmaking authority. For example, America has popular sovereignty [!] which basically means…
- 3023.
India should cede Kashmir to Pakistan to improve relations
For
- I believe my worthy opponent has sidetracked the topic of the debate. The issue here is whether Kashmir should go to pakistan or be retained by india, and not whether kashmir should form its own government. Though convincing, but we hould stick to what the argument states.…
- .. Well to start off, the world is not all white and black, all is grey pertaining to bilateral relations between Indo-Pak relations. Bombs and bullets are are like food and water from them, sometimes the latter i not available while the former is. .. Historically speaking,…
Against
- The title of the debate is "India should give Pakistan Kashmir for smooth bilateral relationships in future" Pro is for Pakistan occupied Kashmir but what Pro fails to specify is in the case Pakistan is not allowed to takeover Kashmir should it be taken over by India or gain…
- Giving Kashmir to Pakistan does not guarantee peace and security to Kashmir. India will not back down from its legally justified claim to Kashmir. Pakistan is not after Kashmir for land or resources but rather to for the sake of Pakistan Ideology. Should India give up Kashmir…
- 3024.
War is sometimes necessary to prevent greater harm
For
- Rebuttal to the Origin of WarThe origin of war you refer to is an original theory of the start of war. I will agree that this is a likely starting point. However for one of the orginal groups to go to war, war was necessary. Man inherently looks to benefit from action, arguably…
- As an individual or group of people, you must prepare for war and be willing to go to war. My basis will be global thermonuclear warfare, personal defense, and history.1. Global Thermonuclear Warfare - Probably not the best idea title but I'll stick with it. This will act as…
Against
- I would have posted but you had not clarified your arguments enough and would have obviously clarified them in your next debate. I used the origin of war to prove why it was unnecessary. The proxy wars will continue. Unless the war era ends, the only way this could happen was…
- You have taken my stance correctly it is the origin that shows what war should be used for. To make this fair and because you didn"t place an argument this is all I am going to post
- 3025.
Russia's law restricting LGBT propaganda does not significantly violate rights
For
- Extend arguments.
- Firstly, promoting homosexuality in Russia is not a criminal offence, but rather an administrative offence. Similarly to getting a parking ticket. If you committed this offence you would not 'find yourselves charged for crimes similar to those of the punishments of Murder and…
Against
- True in my first sentence I had stated that the anti-gay laws in Russia pose no significant threat to the rights entitled to homosexual couples, yet it does pose some sort of threat, a threat that simply cant be set aside. In my comments I did state that: just for the fact of…
- True the Russian "anti-gay law" does not pose a significant threat to the rights of homosexuals in Russian yet it does pose an obstacle that can not simply be avoided. Homosexuality may to many seem like a choice a choice to be and actions that can be posed as sexual activity.…
- 3026.
Lawful concealed carry of firearms benefits society
For
- As I'm on my phone I am going to keep my conclusion short. In reference to my last argument, there are 500k to 3M instances per year where a firearm is used in self defense. That's potentially 3M violent crimes prevented per year. This has obvious individual benefits while also…
- I left the title vague so as to allow my opponent the choice to argue against the benefits of individual concealed carry or as a society. From my R1 post: "You may argue against an individual carrying or that it is detrimental to society as a whole." Correct, this debate is…
Against
- Sadly, the only argument you can tell is that carrying a gun is like having a power that prevents crime automatically, you didn't mentioned the danger posed by having one. The death and injury you can also get by defending yourself and your family. You also assumed that killing…
- All my are arguments are a legitimate one, accidental discharge has got nothing to do to a gun community as a whole. That is why it is very hard for anti gun advocates to prove their point because, in my opinion, all their positions are misplaced and cannot be blamed to the gun…
- 3027.
In a total war without WMDs, the US can defeat any other country
For
- The reason why China wouldn't win is because while their army is sizeable, their airforce and navy are extremely lacking. Their navy don't even have blue-water capability yet. As you can see, my opponent resorts to one argument; that the situation of Iraq shows how an inferior…
- Due to personal circumstances, I had to forfeit my last debate and interestingly enough my previous opponent used the same nation (China). *NOTE* Since character limits are always a pain in the back of mine, I want to tell the voters who do look at the sources that I do not…
Against
- Well firstly before you think you won the war no pun intended,you asked the question could America "USA" win against any country in a total war, and guess what i brought up the country China you want too know why?becasue thats a country that could take on and stop America in…
- You do make a lot of good points on this topic so good in fact i almost thought i had lost :P ,however let me finish with this. [Definition - Total War] "1. Total war is a conflict of unlimited scope in which a belligerent engages in a total mobilization of all available…
- 3028.
Stricter gun control laws would reduce murders, accidents, and suicides
For
- Gun control laws reduce gun violence--the evidence for that is overwhelming. Take two states who did exactly the opposite Missouri and Connecticut: in 1995 Connecticut tightened its gun laws; in 2007 Missouri loosened them. Gin related homicide dropped sharply in Connecticut…
- I believe firmly that stricter gun control laws will reduce gun violence. Having grown up in a conservative family, I have heard every argument against gun control but none of them stand up to any honest evaluation. Let's have a good argument!
Against
- Looking at each of these different countries with great success at gun control what about areas where gun control has not been so successful? The amount of crime in the UK has been steadily declining since 1995, even before they passed their strict gun control laws. Link:…
- I accept the challenge and am looking forward to a good debate. I would like to open with that while stricter gun control laws may reduce some gun related violence, it won't be able to reduce all the issues it's trying to resolve. It may just end up causing more problems than…
- 3029.
Immigrants do more harm than good to America
For
- Let it be said that some immigrants are hardworking and do contribute to our country's greatness. But you said that they pay security tax even if they don't benefit from it, but in reality they do. I make on average $40 a fortnite and at least $20 go to immigrants. It is…
- Many people view immigrants as innocent people who have migrated to America to escape "horrible things" that are currently ongoing in their country of origin. But really, many (not all) come to America to wreak the very horrible things that are supposedly going on in their…
Against
- I have no idea from where you are mentioning these but let me help you to know something and clarify. 1. Immigrants dont have luxary to stay lazy and do nothing. Their visa status won't allow it. 2. Immigrants do pay Tax, and it is a large proportion of IRS's earning. That…
- I do understand the sentiment of locals when they see people from other countries coming to USA and doing some of the best paying jobs while most of the locals staying un-employed. But is it really true? Are the immigrants really the reason for loxals not getting jobs? Actually…
- 3030.
Duterte's policies for the Philippines are justified
For
- You have literally taken my words and phrases and understood them letter by letter, Con. "When drug users are brought to trial, they receive due justice?" Big yes! It is always understood mate especially in district courts which handle civil and criminal cases, that the…
- In your aspect of 'death sentence removed from any form of justice' is definitely invalid to me and to our nation. Remember we have October 10 in 2015 which is the World Day Against the Death Penalty where the world speaks out together to condemn this punishment for it is just…
Against
- Uh... I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say here. When drug users are brought to trial, they receive due justice? Is that what you're saying? Either that or you're making the point that certain criminals involved in drug empires deserve a death sentence. The way…
- For the purpose of preventing everyday people from adopting Duterte-like ideals, I accept the challenge. I will argue that Duterte is a monstrous figure, and that his ideas do not belong in present society. His terrible administration should thereby earn him a legacy that ought…
- 3031.
Military interventionism is a poor tactic for making the world freer and safer
For
- This has been called a war of ideas, and rightly so. As has been shown in Iraq, in order to make "islamofascist" countries freer, we need to do far more than merely toppling the evil leader-du-jour. Why? Because once he's gone, there need to be better people to replace him,…
- Thanks for taking me up on this. I think it's critically important to draw a distinction between the government and the citizenry. You said "These countries [that I mentioned] pretty much stand strong on any issue, and aren't going to change." If by 'countries' you mean…
Against
- I don't believe it's a poor tactic, it just has to be used in the right ways. If you're going to bring force, bring force, just don't use a paltry sum of soldiers to fight.
- yeah, sorry for the misconception, i meant governments. And if a plan like your's was to work, it would require the help of the country's government. As much as the people would want it, the country may not want to deal with us, and may not want our views/culture imposed on…
- 3032.
The Affordable Care Act should not have been passed
For
- Past Presidents did not try to pass costly legislation when our country was in the most debt, by far, that it has ever seen. This bill will add to the debt and Obama Care will only cause things to be worse. The only recourse to this ever mounting debt will be for the government…
- My opponent continues to mock the fact that those in power have won the elections and makes it sound as though, just because they won the election, they can do whatever they want without regards to the will of the American people. Let me remind you please, that this is not a…
Against
- Now for my final argument, let me say that we all know who our President is, and we all know he has a tough job ahead of him. Unfortunately, we don't all know how important this Health Care Reform is. Government Health Care is just as essential as any other government ran…
- How can you say that Obama "forced his own 'personal agenda' down our throats"? Seven Presidents before him wanted and tried to do the same thing; Hilary Clinton wanted this as well. He did not pass this Bill on his own, you know? "The whole idea that this bill is only for a…
- 3033.
Religion and the state should be kept separate
For
- IntroductionIt is often forgotten that religious liberty was the central value and purpose of the Religion Clauses. The "separation of church and state" is a phrase that does not appear in the First Amendment or in the debates surrounding its adoption. The point of the Religion…
- Many thanks in advance to whoever accepts this debate. I look forward to what I hope will be an educational exchange. The ResolutionThis debate will be about the theoretical questions and interpretive issues at stake in the First Amendment's two Religion Clauses, which read:…
Against
- thanks, i accept the challenge. i will debate for separationinst side. i would like to separate religion from state.please post your opening argument quickly.
- pro's first argument: con did not provide any evidence that religious claims are not true.i don't know what to say. in this century of scientific progress somebody can ask proof that religious claims are not true. i have never heard at least one religious claim that…
- 3034.
Israel will not suffer a nuclear attack within twenty years
For
- I have greatly enjoyed this, my first debate. I thank my opponent for his civility and his heart-felt arguments. He clearly believes in his arguments very strongly, unfortunately this belief seems to run so deep that he will not let details such as evidence or logic get in…
- I am concerned that what began as an interesting and intelligent debate is running the risk of becoming boring and repetitive as my opponent seems to be arguing in circles. Additionally as some of the rounds have been quite lengthy I hope that voters will take the time to read…
Against
- [quote]All of this is conjecture, not backed up by evidence, yet presented by my opponent as fact.[/quote] I have presented a ton of evidence, whether or not you choose to accept it is a different thing. [quote]"If and when Iran does have 3,000 centrifuges operating smoothly,…
- Hi there, I'm back. Thanks for the fast response. Before I respond to your arguments, I will show you another possibility of what is possible. A terrorist attack. There have been about 200 documented cases of a person buying material for a nuclear weapon from the black market.…
- 3035.
Democrats are better than Republicans overall
For
- If you are a WOMAN you should vote DEMOCRAT if you are BLACK you should definitely vote DEMOCRAT if you are LGBT you should DEFINITELY vote DEMOCRAT if you are a STUDENT you should DEFINITELY vote DEMOCRAT if you are a SENIOR you should DEFINITELY vote DEMOCRAT, in fact the…
- Republicans a racist, homophobic, sexist, elitist, end of story
Against
- Okay. .. In this speech I'm just going to explain what has happened so far in this debate, as my opponent hasn't refuted my argument nor responded to my refutations. EXPLANATION OF THIS DEBATESo really what this debate comes down to is the "every" in the resolution - as I…
- I am assuming that I can put arguments in round 1 as there are no rules against it, so here we go. OVERVIEW/RESOLUTIONAL ANALYSISThere are a couple things I have noticed in this resolution that I would like to point out and explain. First of all, the wording of the resolution…
- 3036.
Universal health care would harm the United States
For
- No, not "single player health care" UNIVERSAL health care. This would provide health care to anyone currently in America, citizen or not. "By providing healthcare to all, the cost is reduced. Single-payer healthcare will allow all persons to receive regular check-ups. This will…
- Obama's idea for universal health care will not help America. It will hurt the economy, the middle class, and anyone who pays taxes. Rich people know this. They make lots of money and don't want to loose another penny to another one of Obma's idiotic plans, such as heavily…
Against
- "Universal health care" is available to citizens only. http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com... Costs: I've shown that universal health care reduces costs via decreased emergency procedures. My opponent's dominant arguement against this is that these "visiting…
- Extend all my arguments.
- 3037.
Donald Trump would make a great president
For
- Before I begin my rebuttals, I would like to point out that Con has failed to negate any of my statements in my previous rebuttals. Con has also failed to refute my contention about Mr.Trump's generosity and about the proposed Muslim ban. For these reasons, I believe that I've…
- Rebuttals: You claim that I only have one piece of evidence to support my claim that he is politically correct. However you fail to mention why that is bad for being a President. As for the wall, the wall wouldn't cost anywhere near four hundred billion dollars it's estimated…
Against
- I'd like to point out how pro states that I have failed to negate any of his presented claims. He claimed how Trump wanted to help stop illegal immigration, and I refuted that by showing factually why Trump's plan is unrealistic. Pro claimed how Trump would make a great…
- Rebuttal: Donald Trump is without a doubt a successful businessman, and is very knowledgeable about the economy. However, Donald Trump is not a politician. He may have what it takes to employ the people of his businesses, but that does not mean he will be able to find a way to…
- 3038.
Same-sex marriage should not be legal in the United States
For
- Since my opponent has forfieted, I believe that he now agrees with the resolve.
- One thing I would like to say before we start, is that I am not homofobic, and would not like to be called homofobic. I will start out with the fact that homosexuality offends many religions. A list of religions that are against homosexuality are as follows: American Baptist…
Against
- Give me your best shot.
- 3039.
Gun ownership should be restricted only by age and weapon type
For
- One, I would like to say thank you for debating. Now on to discussion. Guns have been demonized and all a gun is is metal. People kill, not guns Why did anyone decide to control guns, it is only metal, and not control knives, screwdrivers, cars, etc. (answer this first) If it…
- I believe that if a person is over 18, he or she should be able to buy any gun and carry it anywhere. When you respond, keep in mind that I am no idiot and when I say gun, I mean it shoots lead, not a rocket launcher. Furthermore, I would like this to be based on common sense…
Against
- "Why did anyone decide to control guns, it is only metal, and not control knives, screwdrivers, cars, etc. (answer this first)" Because A) Guns are usually more destructive than knives and screwdrivers. You can kill someone with a knife or a screwdriver, but guns are generally…
- I accept your challenge.
- 3040.
Guns should be more regulated in the United States
For
- Although my opponent has forfeited the round, I would like to use this opportunity to present a brief summary of my stance on this issue: 1) Certain types of guns should be banned outright, as they are not necessary to the safety of the general public. Some guns, specifically…
- I apologize as well for letting this debate slip my mind. Since we no longer have as many rounds, I'll just jump right into the debate:In response to my opponent's first contention:Numerous studies, also by Harvard, have demonstrated the exact opposite: gun control actually has…
Against
- Hello, I apologize for this debate slipping my mind. Looks like it did for my opponent as well so lets just start now. As a roadmap I will give 2 contentions showing my position on the topic. First Contention: 1. Gun Control Is No Answer to Crime. According to a Harvard study…
- I will argue the con on this topic. If you would like to accept the challenge feel free
- 3041.
Gun control in the United States
For
- Thank you for your response. I'd first like to address that gun control is only a factor in reducing gun crimes. I am not saying that enacting more gun laws would completely erase all gun crime, but is an essential component. As you stated, places such as New York, Minnesota,…
- There should be more gun control laws because of the increasing mass murders in the last twenty years. These mass murders have occurred in places such as Alabama, North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Washington, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. In these…
Against
- I will provide a rebuttal and then present some alternate arguments. Pro changes their argument. In Round 1, my opponent states "strict gun control laws in the United States lead to less murders. " Yet, now in Round 2 they say, "gun control is only a factor in reducing gun…
- Thank you rightandwrong for opening up the debate. I look forward to the discussing this topic. I am not opposed to regulating firearms. In fact, I agree it is a good thing that can help protect people. However, for this debate my opponent proposes there is a direct correlation…
- 3042.
The United States should be considered terrorists if the Taliban are
For
- I. Code BoundThis was the argument I was expecting the opposition to make. The US is bound by a code to respect citizens lifes, yet, this begs the question, why do civilians keep dying under the US military? This is the real question we need to ask ourselves. Just because…
- I. Terrorism is ObjectiveA lot of people try to disregard all arguments by saying they're subjective. Augustine of Hippo disagreed with these people, and I have for a long time myself. Defintions are not interchangable. They simply aren't. The phrase, "If it looks like a duck,…
Against
- I will not argue points I or II because they areimpacts from war in general, I wont ever really argue point II but this is where your argument becomes flawed. In your 3rd point you state "We project military strength, use flame warfare tactics in combat, and have several…
- I accept:Definition Of Terrorist: those who commit violent acts, intended to create fear (terror); and deliberately target or intentionaly disregard the safety of non-combatants with an overall goal to oppress individuals through violence.
- 3043.
The US should aid Mexico in its drug war
For
- So. I think that US should put in way more effort in battling Drug wars in Mexico. Not just trying to clear drugs in the US, but preventing it from the roots in Mexico
Against
- carry arguments forward.
- Sorry to see that happen, carry argument forward.
- 3044.
Governments act against the interests of their citizens
For
- The government is "out to get us" all because of money. The JFK incident happened because the changes he was making would leads us against "government" therefore less dough for them. Let's face it there is a lot of information being with-held from us.. Why do you think that is?…
- I disagree. I believe that the government will do anything to make a couple million even if it goes against their own 'people'; the evidence is everywhere! There is a reason they pronounced on CNN that what actually happened to JFK wouldn't be released for 75 years. I believe…
Against
- He completely drops theJFK accusation. Also, it doesn't matter what he BELIEVES< it matters what is true so you can go ahead and extend the fact that governments have little incentive to intentionally harm us as the resolution suggests. Also, the 9-11 wasn't a conspiracy, there…
- Ok on your JFK claim, where is the source for this because I have never heard of this? Furthermore, my opponent still has not addressed a very important point, which is that the government simply has no reason to "get us" because they are not stupid, even if they were…
- 3045.
Illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay
For
- You have not invalidated any of the reasons I provided for letting illegal immigrants stay. You have instead asserted my sources are "fake facts" and you have mixed the issues of illegal immigration and overpopulation. You also said "ripe us out" instead of "wipe us out". Let…
- I will be arguing that illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in America. The first half of this response will focus on pointing out the flaws in Con's assertion. 1) "Illegal immigrants are blood sucking from America". Grammatical mistakes aside, this statement is a…
Against
- This is not real debate this is a website. So let's debate like that not. You can bring little sources or you can be smart and know your facts like in a real debate. Blacks and Hispanics or more likely to kill whites. There's less white on white again look it up everyone…
- Excuse me the white race is dying out. That is not true about 83% of whites killing each other. It's about 17% but please spit out more fake facts. When we let this illegals in they are overpopulating us and will ripe us out. The birth rate of whites is lower than Mexicans and…
- 3046.
The US should recognize Palestine as a country
For
- I looked forward to facing my opponent's argument, but unfortunately I came down with the flu and don't much feel like doing anything. I concede all 7 points to con.
- Thanks for accepting. Given your response I'd wager you have something tricky up your sleeve. Nonetheless here are my contentions: Contention 1: Negotiations are being abused by Israel. The Israelis and Palestinians have been at each others throats since creation of Israel half…
Against
- Pre-CaseI am going to do something that is considered a nonstandard debate practice on this website: I am going to run a Kritik. A kritik is "generally a type ofargument that challenges a certain mindset, assumption, or discursive element that exists within the advocacy of the…
- I accept. Note that I can argue against the resolution for any reason as long as my arguments do not constitute trolling.
- 3047.
Stricter gun laws are the best way to reduce gun violence
For
- The best method and most effective method for stopping gun violence is to make an example of the culprit and their entire family. Since half of America is in love with guns and they will never get rid of their guns, Because of the beliefs of the tyrannical government, The…
- Like I said before in round 2, Parents are the responsible guardians of their children until they become adults. Also adults were shaped by their parents growing up. All the ideologies of people come from their parents. People are descendants of their parents and most have some…
Against
- One thing that I would like to point out is that not all kids follow in the footsteps of their parents, Even when it comes to politics. My mother and father are Democrat and Independend (Left-Leaning), Respectively. I, However, Am a Libertarian. I had exposed myself to more…
- I don"t know why but it won"t post my debate. This is the third time I"m doing this so hopefully it works. I would like to quote my last argument, Where I said "They have mentally prepared themselves with the fact they will face death. And once this point hits, They will have…
- 3048.
Palestine deserves political autonomy
For
- As much as I'm impressed with my opponents's knowledge in the field of Syllogism: I wish not for a mistake in the wording of this question, divert a debate firmly rooted in political sediment to a philosophical discussion on axioms, inferences and premises. He accepted this…
- Israel finally accepting the two state solution would be a good thing since the apartheid would end, military oppression would be stopped and peaceful stability could be achieved. The Palestinians will be free of the Knesset, be aloud to properly partake in political elections…
Against
- Who are you to start a debate on this website, vomit out a bunch of claims (written in the grammar and spelling of a typical third-grader) with no arguments whatsoever, giving us 2,000 characters to answer them, all the while dripping with your own self-assurance? "Knowledge of…
- Sadly, my opponent has forfeited the last round. My arguments extend. Thank you.
- 3049.
The War on Terror has done more harm than good
For
- They killed thousands of Americans, what more must I say?
- So you are saying we should try and understand the reasoning behind slaughter infidels? There s no "understanding" these people. They would let us understand if we wanted to. I know that the radicals are a minority in Muslim culture, but if other Muslims are "disgusted" by…
Against
- That is precisely the blinkered views that I am talking about and it doesn't help. Individuals should be punished for crimes they have committed but when the situation becomes as generalised as it is in today when not just individuals are being prosecuted but cultures are being…
- No. What I am suggesting is that we actually teach our own citizens about the religious and social beliefs that these people have in order to combat this stigma that occurs in our so called civilised society. For example we now see that there is a massive stigma on Muslim…
- 3050.
Authoritarian government is superior to liberal government
For
- AHHHHH! It deleted everything!!!!! Here just make your closing statements and I will post answers to your argument and a closing argument all in one next, I am sorry that is no fun for either of us.
- Alright we seem to agree on the failure of Democracy in regard to culture however China's success and your question need to be addressed. To answer your whether or not I a mere citizen would be willing to live in an Authoritarian society which enacted policies I disagreed with.…
Against
- I understand your pain, it has happened to me. My closing arguments are as follows: It is understandable for a person you agree with to make all of the decisions, but what if that person is not what you believe. What if the power corrupts the person in charge? Poor leadership…
- 2.A person's standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This is the definition of morals. It is what the individual thinks is right. Not the individual ruler, the individual. "Who am I to call the shots" I will start by answering…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?