Politics Debate Topics — page 60
3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 2951.
Nations should return to monarchy
For
- ok well i think you win thank you for proving me wrong (not in like a jerk way) that was actually kinda hard but thank you
- well we could have a family from England that is royal or we could do the things like the hunger games and do that
Against
- No problem, this was a nice, laid back debate.
- Ok so the British have no jurisdiction over here, and if they tried to take control they'd fail. If we instilled the system from the Hunger Games, there would be a civil war faster than you could say "Jesus".
- 2952.
America, or the United States of America, has done more wrong than right
For
- When i look at USA, i think of how big of a super power, how well it stood against communist ideas and extremists, how much good it has done for the world. but when on looks deeper, the truth surfaces, USA's wrongs do outweigh the rights, they've caused and got involved and…
Against
- Extend
- Extend
- 2953.
Education is the best way to counter the New World Order
For
- The impending NWO is not a debatable in its existence. It is obvious that it is happening, so please do not make this an argument debating on whether this is a false "conspiracy". I believe that the best way to hault this conspiracy is through educating the American public of…
Against
- But, it was not meant to be.
- extend.
- 2954.
Non-natural-born citizens should be eligible to run for president
For
- This topic is not talking about partnerships, trade, or any of those connections we have with other countries. This is about passion. America is a land of the free, home of the brave- but how are we brave, when we can't stand for what's right? The only reason I haven't stood…
Against
- Due to my opponent's failure to respond, it is safe to assume that their argument is invalid. A non natural born citizen should not be able to run for president due to the negative outcome they would cause. This, in no way, implies that any particular race nor culture is…
- If my opponent does not post their last argument, I believe they have lost the debate by default.
- 2955.
The United States is a faltering nation
For
- 1. On this point you basically argued we had global competitors in four groups: China, Russia, India, and Terrorists. Well, as for the first three, I agree they COULD fill the role we need, but the problem isn't that we lack candidates; the problem is that we lack a centric…
- Well, I'd be more than happy to get further in depth after my opponent brings up his points, but here are mine: The United States is on the decline. This is because of several reasons, not all of which are necessary for a downfall, but just contribute. 1. Lack of serious global…
Against
- That's alright, I've been away from the house lately, so I have not been able to check this. I look forward to your response.
- 1. The United States does have serious global competitors. We have China, which is growing at an incredibly fast pace economically and militarily. We have India, which is growing also. We have Russia, which is on the rebound and is also turning into a competitor. I agree that…
- 2956.
An international ban on military drones should exist
For
- My opponent has accepted a rematch.
- Unfortunately, my opponent has forfeited the round. He agreed in the first round to not forfeit, so I guess I win the debate. If anyone would like to debate this against me, or my opponent would like a rematch, send me a message. Thanks.
Against
- This is only my 4th debate on this site, so we are about the same skill level.
- This comes as a surprise. Extend.
- 2957.
The US Constitution should be amended to let naturalized citizens run for president
For
- Brenavia builds his argumentation against allowing naturalized citizens of the United States to become eligible to run for the office of President on the assumption that loyalty to one country is driven by the place of birth. I believe this is a fallacious and discriminatory…
- Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as President of the United States: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall…
Against
- First off, you're claiming that I am making a discriminatory assumption. Not only is this flase, but I believe your position is biased. If you truly believe that naturalized citizens should be able to run for President, fine, but dont call me discriminatory. Secondly, when poll…
- I see where your coming from. This sounds like a good idea, to let all citizens of America have the ability to become President, but there are reason why the President cannot be a naturalized citizen. Contention 1: Loyalty The Natural Opinion Research Center of the University…
- 2958.
Ireland should have only one official language
For
- First to refute a point the opposition has said, you said that if Irish is not the official language, than it will be considered "dead" but what I am saying is that Irish won't be discarded or forgotten, we would preserve the language as part of our history but it won't be…
- Ireland has two official languages, Irish being the first. But we never use Irish on a regular basis. What is the point of learning a language that we can't use. In my opinion, Ireland should have only one official language, and that should be English. I will discuss under the…
Against
- Many scientists have proven research that learning a second language whether it be at home or through the school system finds it beneficial to a students learning ability. Learning more the one language will provide your brain with better functionality and problem solving…
- Irish should remain as one of the official reasons for a number of reasons. Here in the US we don't even have an official language but English is the most common. Ireland has a long history and a very diverse culture (By diverse I mean different from other British Isle…
- 2959.
The United States should fix domestic problems before helping other countries
For
- I, Pro, will be arguing that the US needs to step out of the global spotlight and focus on its own people before giving aid to other countries. Con will be arguing that the US's support on the global stage is necessary and by pulling out troops and ceasing financial aid will be…
Against
- Extend
- Extend
- 2960.
Canada should prioritize domestic needs over aid to Libya
For
- So then you agree with me....given the current circumstance of Ghadaffi's broken promises and move towards violence, Canada should help (and is helping) the people of Libya.
- Canada has the resources (planes and bombs) to protect countless innocent civilians from being slaughtered before the eyes of the world. There are two types of modernized countries, one is noble and protects those in the world from murderous governments, and the other is…
Against
- As my opponent has stated, (canada's people should come together and solve the problem while the gouvernment helps the people with the guns to their heads) > I think the gouvernment should still be over all with there country before becoming a part of a " civil war". The reason…
- In my opinion, Canada should help their own country first. They should help their country as quick as they can so then after that they could help Libya. I'm not saying that Canada should not help other countries although, if Canada has millions of dollars to send planes to…
- 2961.
Social assistance recipients should be required to undergo screening
For
- This debate is argueing for the right to screen any family, people or persons obtaining welfare from the government. The screening will be for everything from illegal drug use to internet and tv.
Against
- Many thanks to any who might have bothered to read my monologue. Despite the anticlimax, I hope that you might trouble yourself a bit more, and evaluate our performances here. I am almost embarrassed even to ask.
- Please allow me to extend all of my arguments, while I await my partner's presentation.
- 2962.
The European Union should be abolished
For
- Rebuttal to your childish claims and accusations:"I'd like to start by reminding you that I'm British so sarcasm is inevitable." - Wow! Are you a child? Bring professionalism into yourdebates. And, if you really believe in this statement, then consider your conduct points…
- On http://www.economist.com..., Mr. Henkel states that: "First, politicians broke all promises made in the Maastricht agreement. Not only was Greece let into the European Union for purely political reasons, but the fundamental rule, "no member to exceed its yearly budget…
Against
- I'd like to start by reminding you that I'm British so sarcasm is inevitable. I really see no problem with using phrases such as 'as well as this', Pro seems to be attacking me more than my argument. Using emotive language is a key part of writing to argue and persuasive…
- As you can see, some wonderful commitment from my opponent here.I hope (s)he can make it for the next round.
- 2963.
A modern form of democracy is preferable to other forms of government
For
- I wish you good luck in the final round. I will begin to refute my opponents case, and then go on to defend my own [Opponent Value] --> He does not present one, thus mine is superior and the 'higher standard'. Whomever upholds democracy throughout this debate the best will win…
- AFFIRMATIVE [Quote] "The love of democracy is that of equality." Charles de Montesquieu [Definitions] Modern Democracy- a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly Preferable- having greater value or desirability…
Against
- My opponent has grossly mis-represented my argument. Additionally, he has resorted to cheap tricks as a means of attempting to win this debate. As he has noted, I am bound by the terms of service not to include any additional arguments in my final round. Therefore, I will limit…
- I would like to begin by welcoming PeeGor to Debate.org. Thank you for the opportunity to debate this very interesting topic. I negate: That Democracy is preferable to all other existing forms of government. He defines a Democracy as such: "Modern Democracy- a government in…
- 2964.
The United Nations should prioritize poverty reduction over environmental protection
For
- I would first like to state the format of this debate: Round 1: Constructive Round 2: Rebuttal Round 3: Summary I am in the firmest affirmation of the resolution when in conflict, the United Nations should prioritize global poverty reduction over environmental protection for…
- I would like to apologize for forfeiting that round, I could not find the time to post, I was busy. I believe I won because neither me nor my opponent rebutted, and I feel as though I had the better constructive. I did not copy and paste the motto, instead I cited my sources…
Against
- Well, looks like you have forfeited your round. Anyway, your first argument did not have any substantial points to even allow a chance for rebuttal. You have just copied and pasted the motto of the U.N from the website and there are no solid reasons to strengthen your argument.…
- To start off, it is very important to realize that we would be fundamentally wrong in treating the two problems as mutually non-interdependent. In the majority of cases, the problem of hunger and lack of clean drinking water (both are components of poverty) arise mainly due to…
- 2965.
China has created a successful form of socialism
For
- I will say this talk to young Chinese folks, They are happy their progress their nation makes, Few object to communists running things or attempting a socialist path as long as progress such amazing progress is made in improving the standard of living, Individual freedom is…
- Between Capitalism and Communism is a transitory period known as Socialism where the society moves toward an communist and egalitarian utopia, Before any of this may happen a rurla society must go through a period of capitalist development, This is consistant with both marxist…
Against
- The crux of your argument is that because China has socialist tools at it's disposal, And are currently experiencing positive growth, They are considered a successful socialist state, However, You have mired your argument by conceding that China has "compromised" it's core…
- 2966.
The United States should end its embargo on Cuba
For
- Do you really think any of the direct trade income would flow through the hands of the Cubans? No, this is not a capitalistic state this has a pure communist regime in place. Why should we make deals with people associated with dictatorships? We shouldn't that defeats American…
- Your missing a big point here Logan! We should not take this off because the communist dictatorship has done nothing to lift the embargo. President Kennedy told them that he would lift the embargo if they meet the requirements, which was to ease off of the Cuban people and give…
Against
- Why do we insist on enforcing these restrictions on the government of Cuba. This is completely unethical, and this is the only communist nation that we do this to, If we required this for all communist nations then it would be ethical but since we only do it to Cuba it is…
- The Embargo on Cuba is unjust and needs to be demolished. Why does the United States support this Embargo? there is no answer to this question. They may justify it by saying that they are communist or repressive. We trade with both Laos and Vietnam. Both governments are…
- 2967.
A world government would be a bad idea
For
- No problem, Con. I would be more than happy to continue this debate with you at a later time. Good luck with whatever you're working on.
- Thanks, Con. It seems my opponent has already argued against and subsequently defeated his own case. "Despite highly extensive differences, people all have that common ground [credo] ... I advocate a world government which is strong, and prudently federalized, yet gentle, in…
Against
- Thank you, and thank you. I imagine my temporary concession (due to time constraints) is a disappointment. At a time less busy (potentially after Christmas), a continuation may be prudent. Once more, my apologies.
- I sincerely apologize, but, due to a significant increase in business, I shall likely be unable to participate in any debates. Since it is more sporting for me to concede than forfeit, and because I legitimately do wish to continue this debate, I simply request that we continue…
- 2968.
America is in a downward spiral
For
- America I believe is in a medium paced downward spiral. We are destroying ourselves from within, such as unchecked immigration, loss of family fabric and attack on family fabric. Progressive left wing media that is unethical and free to attack anyone with outright lies, without…
Against
- No such luck. Voters, you've been given no unanswered reason to believe that America is in a downward spiral. Since my opponent ff'd, conduct should be straightforward, but I also believe I've won arguments and sources, so I ask for your vote. Thank you for your…
- I was looking forward to my opponent's response, and still hope he provides one. Extend all arguments.
- 2969.
The government should create state-run orphanages for children from at-risk families
For
- Here are the points made in the last Con post I. Children age 6 to 7 are not participating in gang violence II. Younger children would be incapable of formulating this type of student government III. Access to programs should be brought to the children in at-risk families, not…
- (Let me start by thanking you for your courtesy, and apologizing in advance if my argument gets a little heated, it's just the way I am.) The argument that these children are not leaders due to the fact that they come from at risk families, although logical at first glance,…
Against
- Greylance, Allow me to say that this has been very enjoyable. For my first debate on debate.org, I think it's been a blast. I hope we get lots of votes, one way or the other. I like the break down of points, so I'll stick with that and add some closers of my own. I. I acquire…
- Greylance, Thanks again for the arguments. I can understand how some things get very heated, I'll try my best to stay cool headed as well. :) I am afraid that I may be coming off as assuming that because the kids are poor, they are not good leaders. That is certainly not the…
- 2970.
Communism is the best form of government in theory
For
- Extend all arguments Class Struggle: con agree's that it has been a part of human struggle and re aferms my point. Checks and Balence: Having a middle class that evryone is in IS structure, and might remind you that this is on PAPER, and so any arguements pretaining to prctice…
- The Communist Manifesto can be broken down into multiple key points: 1: History can be viewed as a constant class struggle Marx and Engel argued that history has always been the same, from living standards to revolutions and that often classes divide us more than nationality,…
Against
- Communism is not the only government that sounds good on paper. Democracy sounds great because the people are able to directly contribute to their government. Fascism sounds great because it is all about control so nobody rises up. Anarchy sounds great because there is no…
- I would like to argue that a democratic republic with a capitalist economy is a great form of government. 1: Class Struggle/ Economy I would agree that class struggle has been a problem throughout history. The question always is how do you end this struggle between the classes.…
- 2971.
The United States should make English and Spanish official languages
For
- Please use more than personal opinion in your arguments. Do not use Wikipedia for a source, but instead, go to the bottom of the Wikipedia page, find the source, and cite the original website that the information was on. If you cannot find the source, then the Wikipedia…
- I must make one thing clear for you. Official language does not mean only language. People would still be able to live and work here if they speak Chinese only. Also, you misunderstood what I said about Xhosa. Few Americans speak it, and without an official language, the…
Against
- My opponent says that the official language does not mean only language and that people would still be able to live here if they speak Chinese only. This is actually false. "Official language" means that the government will only conduct business in that language, which deprives…
- Let us be clear about one thing: America is not a European nation. The reason that there is no official language is that the government is not promoting any one culture over another and is not favoring any one group over another. Not all citizens speak English or Spanish; some…
- 2972.
The United States should adopt national ballot measures
For
- You have all your facts incorrect, my friend. You start by saying we already vote on these issues? I would like you to cite the last time, We the Voters were allowed to vote on any NATIONAL ISSUES directly on any Federal Ballot. The rest of your arguments are all the same,…
- We have Ballot Measures in about 35 of the 50 states. People have used them to lower their taxes, support great ideas like California just passed a STATE BALLOT MEASURE to allow Stem Cell Research and even funded it, so now the largest scientific community in this field is…
Against
- The point of the whole arguement was that we indirectly vote on the federal issues by who we put in office to respresent our state and our country. Nobody goes into a voting station blindfolded. I was not aware that you are from California. That still doesn't change the fact…
- You speak of Democracy as if it doesn't exist. People vote on a variety of issues yearly and determine whether our state, or our nation, needs to amend, do away with, or add laws. The point blank fact here is that people everywhere do not think the same. California passed a…
- 2973.
The US should build a missile defense system
For
- Now why countries need a missile defense system is for their own protection. This can be optional for them and they can make as complex or as simple as they wish. They can make as cheap or as expensive. They can decide how long they wish to have this missile defense system. The…
- In my opinion, a missile defense system is needed for defense and protection from other countries in case of a war. A missile defense system provides great protection from missiles which could destroy a targets. It can be a military target or civilian target which could kill…
Against
- My opponent seems to have completely missed my point. I would like to point out that my opponent has also contradicted himself. He says that missiles kill people, and we need missile defense systems to save lives. Then, which makes absolutely no sense, he says, "Why did Hitler…
- Now, onto business. Why does every country need a missile defense system? My opponent seems to believe its a necessity for safety, to spend millions of dollars on such systems. How will every country afford this? Surely some countries wouldn't be able to, in which others gain a…
- 2974.
Congress should devolve road funding and authority to the states
For
- Our roads and bridges are crumbling. It's only a matter of time before we have another disaster of the type that befell the Twin Cities. The problem is that the desperately needed funds to rebuild and maintain our infrastructure are few and far between; the Highway Trust Fund…
Against
- Essentially essential.
- The centralization is essential to the success of inter-state projects.
- 2975.
The United States is a dying superpower
For
- I agree with your argument but we cannot blindly believe in the news and what we are told we must go and see for our selves. I agree the US isn't dying but it is fading away from the global stage its losing its ferocity on a global stage our nation no longer is feared and…
- The United States has been a super power since the end of WWII but with the combination of weak leadership and a weakening economy the enemies of the USA have taken this time to strike and have seen no resistance from the United States there enemies are slowly taking the mantle…
Against
- All points extended, I guess.
- Yes, but this isn't new. The US has always been a "ticking time bomb", if you will. Yes, speaking your mind becomes harder and harder every day simply because if everyone thinks one way, you're expected to think the same. If you don't think the same as everyone else, you're…
- 2976.
Fox News is an unreliable news source
For
- Tell me how are FOX news viewers supposed to interpret a debate that fox showed of Obama, only they used an Obama impersonator to substitute for Obama? http://elections.americablog.com... How are viewers supposed to interpret Fox news editing a discussion with John Stewart?…
- --I will mean political propaganda --by spreads I mean broadcasts it --By Fox news I mean its shows. There have been over 5 research studies that show that the simple act of watching fox news makes one more misinformed and ignorant. I will post each one.…
Against
- Good points. Again I must reinstate that fact that it is what the people who watch the shows see in the reoprting that determines the reliability of a news source. News is bound for altercations, as it is simply what it appears to be, new. If all news was accurate there would…
- There have been over 5 research studies that show that the simple act of watching fox news makes one more misinformed and ignorant. I will post each one. Here is the problem with your post. One cannot assume that it is FOX that is causing these statistics to exist in its…
- 2977.
Anarcho-capitalism is the only effective route to a stateless society
For
- Round 1: Statement of claim and acceptance only Round 2: Argument Round 3: Rebuttal Round 4: Conclusions Claim: The only way to effectively organize and distribute goods and services in absence of the state is to have as capitalist society. True capitalism actually requires…
Against
- Extension
- Extension
- 2978.
The United States should support a soft partition of Iraq
For
- I am sorry it took so long to post this; I had a chemistry test today that I had to study for. The most "straightforward" option was to try to create a new federal government after Saddam; we have been trying that since we ousted him over 4 years ago. Its time for a new…
- For your points: (note: I numbered these for my own convenience, and to make it easier to find my rebuttals of your points in later rounds) 1 while this may be true in soft partition cases in the past, Iraq is an unique situation, in no other historical case of soft partition…
Against
- No, if they keep stabilizing the region within about 50 years or so it will be a better country, and hopefully Al Qauda free. Boundaries are already done, but it will spark war for wealth of an area of land for oil. No the violence in Iraq is caused by Al Qauda, they jump in to…
- Too your 1st point you have failed to point out that there will be disputes even further than that because of the partition. The most straightforward option is to try and make the case that a soft partition of Iraq would be useless, and would accomplish nothing in the way of…
- 2979.
The UN should create a standing army
For
- A UN Standing Army would solve the problem of American military hegemony.
- A UN standing army would be ideally suited to respond to contemporary crises.
Against
- A UN standing army is unnecessary
- There are better alternatives to solving the problems of contemporary warfare.
- 2980.
New Zealand should abolish its defence force
For
- Sounds like a bad idea to me.
- Yeah. I am cool.
Against
- .. Con! C'mon, you know you want to!
- Oh. Cool.
- 2981.
The Iran nuclear deal was a mistake
For
- Obama has already received enough critique for being a possible islamist, but now he has given more opportunity for an atomic war on Isreal by not taking the appropriate action to stop the development of nuclear weapons in Iran.
Against
- As I am unsure if my opponent didn't know if he set the time limit low on these rules I will allow him to respond in the comments if he so wishes. As for my argument it boils down to the following. 1. There is no proof that Iran is actively pursuing Nuclear WeaponsIran is…
- Since it appears that round 1 is for opening statements I will provide mine here. My opponent is arguing that the Iran Deal is definitely a bad move. Iran Deal: Recent diplomatic treaty that restricts Iran's access to centrifuges and allows for international inspections of…
- 2982.
Term limits violate the principles of democracy
For
- He definately would have gone at least one more. Perhaps we could have avoided the entire Clinton era.
- No problem, I'm glad we can agree on this issue. Frankly, I'm surprised it doesn't get more attention in contemporary society.
Against
- He definitely would have. Now, what should we do about it? I know: Repeal the 22nd amendment. Then they would be free to be in office as long as they want.
- Yeah, all it does is restrict what leaders can do, and if it's what the people want, then so be it. I frankly wouldn't be surprised if Ronald Reagan served four terms if it weren't for the 22nd amendment.
- 2983.
The US government should not give monetary aid to Africa
For
- 1.I repeat, our deficit is NOT ok. It is not ok by any means. In fact, we are headed into what is inevitably going to be a repeat of the great depression. The US dollar is at an all time low. Oil prices have peaked. US inflation could drive interest rates to 20%. This would…
- 1. We are not fine rght now. Funding for Iraq has put us in debt. How long will Americans allow for taxes to be raised? For all we know, spending money on Africa will send us into economic recession that we cannot escape from, and lead to another depression similar to the 30s.…
Against
- Ok, its later in the debate, so I will only respond to what I feel is needed 2. EU is effective! I already stated the EU is the world leader in AID to Africa, and is best positioned to solve(thats Dochas 04) The EU is also the world leader in clean water, and has the best…
- We don't need to raise taxes by much. We are spending money on more things, and we are ok. What I mean bu OK is that we all are still here, no depression has happened, and etc. Also, I stated how the EU would be able to help, if we ask. Also, there are plans set up(Water for…
- 2984.
Freedom must sometimes be sacrificed to preserve morality
For
- I don't have a lot of characters, so forgive me if I skip the pleasantries and cut to the chase. 1. My opponent agrees that freedom to do wrong is a not justified standard of right. Point won by the pro. 2. The sacrificed freedoms we are discussing are the ones that grant the…
- Freedom to do wrong is not a justified standard of right. How could it be? Thus the freedoms that are sacrificed (spelled with a "c", not an "s") are the ones that grant the ability to be immoral. The "contradiction" in my introduction was intended to illustrate that I do not…
Against
- 1. Con refers to Pro's initial statement "some freedom must be sacrificed. Freedom within restriction is good". Pro's initial statement implies that further freedoms must be sacrifised, which means there must be a change so to speak this assertion is supported by another…
- Seems like a very eager opponent who declares victory long before its been attained, but anyway"Freedom to do wrong is not a justified standard of right"That is known throughout the world, and no constitution grants a person a freedom to do something that is regarded as wrongul…
- 2985.
The United States should normalize relations with Cuba
For
- No, he just cried at how terrible you are. Sorry. It was ridiculous to even try and continue.
- =============================== Definition debate =============================== Overview: Extend that we have an interpretation of normalize - from the 1ac, "It is because the U. S. embargo is the main strain on relations between the two countries that Chris and I see the…
Against
- ROFL Coppter. My opponents conceded. Prefer my Definition, and by prefering it vote Con. The resolution is mute. Thank you for this entertaining debate.
- Ok, my guess is my opponent couldn't figure out how to get Chris to post his argument, so after 3 day the time just ran out on him. Word Of Advice: You can't get anyone else to post arguments. Even if we have partners. lol. Exstend all of my arguments, again prefer my…
- 2986.
First-world governments should give financial aid to developing nations
For
- I apologize for my forfeit. I am starting school in 3 days.
- I would now like to provide some refutation and present some of my own contentions. Foreign aid is given to the governments of these 3rd world countries. That is correct; the money is given to the government. Firstly, if you look at my uncontested definition, in no part does it…
Against
- My opponent has forfieted the third round. You have one more chance to counter my round 3 arguement.
- This is the start of the 3rd roundI don't know where my opponent is getting his statistics as AIDS/HIV in Africa has steadily been dropping I got this from google public data (All info comes from the World Bank). This statistic says other wise, I'll start off with some…
- 2987.
WikiLeaks was wrong to publish leaked documents online
For
- If I understand your position correctly you are arguing that Wikileaks did a good thing correct? Well considering I am arguing against you I must say that what was done was an attack on our national security. After Wikileaks released their cables foreign powers have done less…
- I'm sorry my opponent forfeited the last round but since that is what happened we must extend all my arguments across therefore I win.
Against
- This is open to anyone and everyone. I'm using this as a simple basis for my class debate on the same subject. I'm sorry if I don't use the proper format, this is my first online debate.
- I, myself, am not American. A true Canadian at heart, living in a country that has had very few leaks about political dealings. Why, you may ask? We guard our secrets well. We make sure we trust everyone in our government. After all, it isn't the media's job to guard political…
- 2988.
The Royal Family is useless
For
- Like I said, people come to see the sights and the palace. Not the people themselves.
- Actually the entire royal family spends about an estimated "202 million a year, enough to pay for thousands of teachers, nurses or police officers at a time of sweeping public spending cuts. There is no reason to believe that if Britain abandoned the monarchy tourism would…
Against
- The royals own the palaces. In return for a salary, they let Parliament take the money they would have earned on the property.[1] If the royals are deposed and lose their salary, they have no obligation to pay Parliament money on the lands. If you taking those properties away…
- In addition to the 160 million pounds the royal family earns for the UK government annually,[1] they generate up to 500 million pounds for the UK government in tourist revenue.[2]References:1. http://www.cgpgrey.com...2. http://www.telegraph.co.uk...
- 2989.
The national motto of the United States should be changed
For
- Good luck in your final round. -------- I would also like to introduce a new definition: Motto: 1. a short saying expressing the guiding maxim or ideal of a family or organization, esp. when part of a coat of arms 2. a verse or maxim contained in a paper cracker 3. a quotation…
- 2 Round Debate 72 Hour Rounds 8,000 Character Limit 2 Week Voting Period ====== Resolved, That the motto of the U.S. should be changed. I propose that the motto of the United States of America be changed from "In God We Trust" back to the original "E Pluribus Unum" (Latin for…
Against
- First of all, bravo for my new opponent new argument, let's us continue shall we? Yes, and maybe I was wrong about using the wrong definition for the word God, but let's us look at our next argument of my lovely opponent: "Con claims that it is not the Christian god in…
- First of all, we should take a good look at our definition of the word "God" 1capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a: the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe bChristian Science : the incorporeal divine…
- 2990.
English should be the official language of the United States
For
- "Official English" does not mean "English only"
- Official English only limits federal govt, not others.
Against
- English is not under threat nor needing protection
- Official English undermines benefits of linguistic diversity
- 2991.
European constitutional monarchies ought to be dissolved
For
- ROUND 1This debate will be about the constitutional monarchies of Europe and whether or not this form of government should be accepted. The premise of this debate is the Constitutional Monarchies of Europe ought to be dissolved. I will take the Pro side of the premise, while my…
- ROUND 3 I would first off like to apologise for the delay for my response. Procrastination for my Biology lab resulted in procrastination for this debate. I am stuck in the everlasting circle of procrastination. Oh well. Anyways, let us return to the debate!ECONOMIC BENIFITS OF…
Against
- Round 3RebuttalsI would like to start off by mentioning the journalist my opponent quoted. Hamilton Nolan can also be quoted as saying this about the monarchy, (it should be noted that he is talking about all members of the monarchy here, including the elderly Queen and the…
- Round 2I, too, would like to show my appreciation to my opponent for challenging me to this debate - it is greatly... appreciated. I'm sure we can fit some fun into what I hope shall be an eye-opening and interesting debate.Economic benefits of the MonarchyIt is integral to my…
- 2992.
The government should abolish term limits for politicians
For
- Report me. You won't do it. This debate never started but I'm going to finish it. I'll go out with a bang, just like kamikaze pilots. I never joined this site to debate. My ignorance and your wasted time is my win.
- Freedom rings here in America. I lick my feet and you smell like beets. You can't change the government from this website. Get out there and aggressively mame some fools. Cabbage head flatulant.
Against
- Okay... So I don't understand why my opponent is mentioning such racist arguments... It is very dismannered for the opponent to insult me in this debate... I think the my opponent should elaborate on the issues on the debate, not me... actually. In this round, I'll not mention…
- The reason why I am opposing this motion. .. is simple. It leads to unbalance of the congress(between parties) or the government itself. For example, Park Jung-Hee, the former president of the Republic of Korea(I am the citizen of that country) made the Yoosin Amendment, which…
- 2993.
Super PACs harm the election process
For
- Observation 1: This debate is looking at whether super pacs are a harm to the election process not just the presidential outcome. The argument that Obama won even though he had less money from outside sources isnt a defining argument, we have to look further into what is the…
- I feel I have won this debate as I have successfully refuted my opponents points and my opponent also dropped to rounds. I urge you to cast a Pro ballot.
Against
- In order to be fair i will refrain from posting a rebutall this round. Before I start I would like to offer one sole observation: 1) As noted by political watchdog the electoral knowledge the three pillars of any electoral process are voter participation, informed citizens and…
- I of course accept
- 2994.
Minarcho-capitalism should be preferred to anarcho-capitalism
For
- Thank you, Con, for supplying your opening case. I look forward to refuting it to the best of my abilities. I have developed a refutation and I will address several of the most prominent issues in your opening statement. As a quick side note, I will mention that much of this…
- Note to the Judges Note to the judges of this debate. There was originally a flaw in the initial rules. They way rounds were set out would have left Pro writing a rebuttal to Con's opening case before Con's case was even written. A revision is being made. Here is the new round…
Against
- The Non-Aggression Principle My opponent seems to misunderstand what the NAP is exactly. This principle is a measure in which we can rate which society is better than another. In my beginning rounds, I argued how that, if one society is morally superior than the other, this…
- Thanks, Pro. The main reasons that an anarchist society is preferable to a minarchist society were already explained in my rebuttal rounds, but I will attempt to reiterate them in a new and organized fashion: Argument 1: The Non-Aggression Principle The minarchist society…
- 2995.
Britain should abolish its royal family
For
- Although the royal family may create income through tourism, this does not benefit the tax payers who are yearly paying for the royal family. Also, the royal family themselves are not appealing to tourists, it is the history and architecture of buildings, such as Buckingham…
- As a British resident myself, I believe that the British royal family is a waste of time, money and publicity. My first reason, is that the British Royal family brings shame and unwanted attention to Britain. In July 2012, on a holiday to Los Vegas, Prince Harry was…
Against
- I extend all my arguments.
- Sorry for the delay, I've been rather busy the last two days :)'Although the royal family may create income through tourism, this does not benefit the tax payers who are yearly paying for the royal family.'The monarchy costs just 56p per taxpayer per year (1); which is hardly…
- 2996.
The world should adopt a single world government
For
- We humans are our own worst enemy. We have to unite under one flag or parish from our own self destruction. This is the sad truth of the human race."Only two things are infinite, the universe and humanity and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."Albert Einstein…
- "Where does it say so, in the last 50 years the nr of countries has actually risen as larger countries are divided. EU is also deep into massive problems that makes more people wanting to go out and dependable on what happens to Greece, Italy the future of EU might be very…
Against
- Well, as TheMoose forfeited these last rounds I guess I cant do much more. The sources I have used during the debate. . http://www.rome.info... (the fall of rome) . http://www.europeanvoice.com... (support for EU is at an all time low) . http://rt.com... (the problem with open…
- As my opponent forfeited his last round I will continue with what I missed in the last round. "Companions would be strictly regulated to prevent the situation that our government is in now." Yet again, good intentions but how is this going to be implemented? The companies got…
- 2997.
George W. Bush was a good president
For
- Well with an opening line like that, I guess I was supposed to know you just thought he was bad. /end sarcasm Either way, I think of Bush more as a completely inconsequential president. I mean, it's not like anything he's done can't be fixed, all things considered. No Child…
- Ok I have to say first that even though I agree Bush sucks, your evidence and bad humor compels me to act against you in the name of all INTELLIGENT Bush haters. President Bush is without a doubt not the worst president in American history. I would put my money, the smart…
Against
- I have an objection: I did not debate that Geirge W. Bush is the worst president ever. That was stated by The New Yorker in their June 2006 issue. Your entire first round was devoted to debating that Herbert Hoover is the worst president ever. Thi is completely beside the point…
- "President George W. Bush is the worst president in all of history."-The New Yorker. President George W. Bush has done so much in harm of the United States that many citizens believe he is Anti-American. For example, he started a war against Iraq to "help" their country out of…
- 2998.
America should adopt open border policies
For
- You see, if Mexico and America has a criminal extradition treaty, which is one country transfers a suspected or convicted criminal to another country, therefore allowing both nations to take criminals (drug cartel leaders, human trafficking leaders, organized crime leaders) to…
- Illegal immigrants are people who enter into a country ILLEGALLY. Open Borders means that people can go through borders without any restrictions from stopping them. Also, about disease, that has not been proved because international airports is an hot spot for disease since…
Against
- We'd make ourselves prone to war. Although we are in NATO, it would be a strain on other countries to have to assist us if someone undocumented from another country attacked us. We also have plenty of illegal activities going on with the borders up. The number would spike up so…
- I believe the United States having open border policies is a disaster waiting to happen. If we have open borders, then the United States will be open towards not only disease, corruption, etc, but is also open towards attacks, war, militia attacks, and much more. If we open our…
- 2999.
WikiLeaks poses a threat to United States security
For
- I would like to conclude by saying that my opponent has failed to refute any of my contentions or attacks. He has not replied at all; because of this I believe that the vote should be for the Pro. Thank you.
- To avoid being too abusive I will not post any arguments this round, and give my opponent a chance to post in the next round.
Against
- Con Case Wikileaks first came under the Government spotlight in November of 2008 when it became a popular site for internet "Whistle Blowers." As the website rose in prominence, its resources grew; and with those resources they managed to procure and publish almost one hundred…
- 3000.
Campaign financing should be heavily regulated
For
- Thanks JustinAMoffattP1."Certainly, money has some affect on elections, but not so much that we should be willing to amend or violate the constitution to get rid of it." In that statement, you have conceded a crucial part of the entire debate. Money does indeed have an effect…
- Ok, a policy debate it is! I would like to start by agreeing with my opponent's, perhaps slightly informal summary of my 3 policy arguments. However, my opponent unfortunately fails to provide successful rebutall to my arguments. I will now respond to what he has claimed.…
Against
- :)Let's do this! P1. Mo' Money, Mo' ProblemsCertainly, money has some affect on elections, but not so much that we should be willing to amend or violate the constitution to get rid of it. My opponent cited two sentences from a paper I brought forth as evidence, and proceeded to…
- Thanks for having me, AdamCass. Let's make it a fun one!Since this so closely resembles a policy debate, that is how I will approach it.Essentially, my opponent proposed three warrants for his plan to be implemented. These will be labeled...P1. Mo' Money, Mo' Problems (Money in…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?