Politics Debate Topics — page 63
3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 3101.
Nuclear weapons research should be prohibited internationally
For
- My opponent fails to recognize the nature of the world we live in. Countries such as Iran and North Korea are not going to simply halt their nuclear weapons research in the scenario of U.S. disarmament. The U.S. and other European powers who currently maintain nuclear arsenals…
- Nuclear research acts as a defense to the abuse of irresponsible states.
Against
- My opponent states a fact that is correct, Nuclear weapons will act as a defense mechanism against irresponsible states. However, my opponent fails to recover that those states may feel threatened against the research, and launch an attack on the United States. Additionally,…
- I am going to reboot this after my opponent forfeited. PLEASE ONLY ACCEPT THIS DEBATE IF YOU ARE WILLING TO SEE IT OUT UNTIL THE END! R1: Acceptance & Opening Statements R2: Rebuttals and additional statements/sources R3: Final Rebuttals & Conclusions TO CLARIFY: I classify…
- 3102.
Feminism is fundamentally about gender equality, not misandry
For
- I don't have much to say, as my opponent has forfeited this round, but I would like to correct an error that I made in Round 3. I said, and I quote, "Misogynists say, 'Wow, that man claims to have been raped? That must be false, as that would make him a coward, which only men…
- Even though my opponent has forfeited this round, I would like to make another point about the sexism against women that exists in society. In society, it is considered acceptable for men to show their nipples, but not for women. This is a blatant double standard. Some people…
Against
- Still all rights should be upheld all the time at all times
- Equal rights for all should be upheld over the right of a few.
- 3103.
Libertarians are right to oppose victimless crimes and support gun control
For
- It is common sense. If a prison is full nobody new can get in. They have to free people by ending sentences or paroling. Here is a source: www. prisoncommission. org/statements/haney_craig. pdf I really wanted to debate gun control but ok. Most of those crimes are not…
- Ok. I respond to ALL of his points below but I'd like you to seee my offense first. First of all, he didnt even begin to talk about gun control. In Florida, the gun ban was dropped and crime lowered 20%. In D. C. , gun bans were enstated and crime rose dramatically. Criminals…
Against
- For starters lets go over what I asked for which you conveniently ignored, and AGAIN, I would like to press for evidence of these facts 1-"Parole allows criminals to leave prison because the jail is overcrowded." 2-"If the jails were less crowded with victimless criminals, then…
- Hello, and thank you for starting this debate. First, I am going to discuss the consequences of "victimless crimes" in which you state, and I quote "No body is hurt". In case you are unaware last year over fifteen thousand people were killed in drunk driving accidents even…
- 3104.
The United States is justified in using private military firms abroad to pursue its military objectives
For
- NC - AC NC First, he conceded my definitions. To win I must prove we have a satisfactory reason to use PMC's. Value His value is Justice, defined by him as "being just or fair". First, the definition is circular. Justice is doing what is just? Secondly, I cant experience…
- Good luck to you as well. My last opponent on this had his account deactivated; I hope there wont be a similar problem here. AC I affirm, and define the following terms. Justified: to show a satisfactory reason for something done (Random House) Private military firm: (Hired)…
Against
- As a brief roadmap, I will first start out by stating the Negative's side of the debate, and attacking my opponent. Dwight D. Eisenhower once said "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the…
- I will take the CON side, therefore welcoming the Affirmative to this debate. I would like it to be LD- format, let's have fun... haha :D Good luck opponent
- 3105.
UKIP is a racist party
For
- I would firstly like to pint out that when talking about how evil Israel is, it is to shed light on the government, not the people. The government of Israel is evil because of the murder they are performing on Palestinians. It's true that all parties have racist members but…
- Well, starting off with the leader of Ukip, Nigel Farage. In May he said in a BBC interview, "I was asked if a group of Romanian men moved in next to you, would you be concerned? And if you lived in London, I think you would be." This is debated whether this was racist among…
Against
- My opponent states UKIP is racist,he provides evidence in the form of comments made by other's. These comments, although controversial, are NOT racist but are sexist. He has said that all parties have racist member's, and agreed they do not reflect the view's of the party which…
- Thank you for your argument. Due to the rather small character count, I have written by argument on another link: http://pastebin.com...
- 3106.
Gun control is an effective way to reduce the impact of violent crime
For
- Alright, given that this is the last round, I'd like to sincerely thank (not to my other thank yous weren't sincere) my opponent for engaging with me on this debate. I really do appreciate his arguments, even if I fervently disagree with them. with that, I'll launch into some…
- If he wants to change his stance after this debate, I'd be flattered, but I'd rather that he aim to explore his views more thoroughly than completely shift them as a result of this debate. Now, into some rebuttal. "Gun control is not needed in order for that it is responsibilty…
Against
- I think we finalize the result I a now for gun control and I think your arguent was better
- So now you're supporting suicide? I find this a difficult argument to stomach. Tens of thousands of people a year commit suicide, many with severe mental illness that could be treated.[2] Those lives could be saved and lived well. That's not to mention that thousands of…
- 3107.
Affirmative action should be abolished
For
- Every kind of person has equality of opportunity but only those who deserve a position on merit should win it. Because we live in a meritocracy employers, universities, and other institutions should choosed the best person for the position regardless of background or race. To…
- OK..I have had a busy week and barely made it back on here for Round 3! I don't have alot of time but hopefully I can address at least a few of your arguments! "Why something was originally set up is not an argument for why something should be dissolved now as that something…
Against
- I apologize beforehand if my later arguments are not that great as I have a busy week but this topic is interesting to me. I would like to narrow the debate and go to an extreme and call affirmative action a form of racism and not a form of socialism or a progressive…
- My pleasure debating you. AA is a really interesting topic as it spills over into so many different spheres. Psychology, econonomics, philosophy, biology, etc. First I'll address the topic at hand and afterwards I'll post somemore stuff dealing w/ AA. For purposes of this…
- 3108.
English should be the official language of America
For
- Hello Imapanicbomb- When I read my argument, I relized that my argument wasn't that "clear". I will try to clear it up now. We need to make English the official language of America. We speak it in Congress, courthouses, national parks, and Presidential speeches. It is spoken in…
- Hello Potential debaters: I think that the US should make English the official language of the US. It is the most widely spoken language in America. 1) 215 million Americans speak English, the only other language that more than 2 million people speak is Spanish. So, there what…
Against
- Hello, this is my first debate so I apologize if I misunderstand the format. I'll take it point by point. 1 You said: 215 million Americans speak English, the only other language that more than 2 million people speak is Spanish. So, there what is there to lose. The serious…
- Righty: "It will lower taxes. How will it lower taxes? Well, we can now deny people of social security, because they can't get a job due to only speaking Spanish. Heres how it would work: In the state of New Mexico, there are 5,000 people who get unaployment pay from the state.…
- 3109.
Donald Trump is a good president
For
- Lowering taxes make people richer and not poorer. The military needs to be stronger in order to fight North Korea. The wall is so Mexicans will not enter America illegally. For abortion he will use pro life supreme court justices. Scandals about Donald Trump do not exist. The…
- Obama made the debt rise, and Trump will fix the problem with America's debt. Furthermore, he will ban abortion.
Against
- It may be true that it makes people richer but you ignore the debt. It doesn't need to be stronger. North Korea has a worse military, has less spending, and far less nukes. They're like crying children. The wall won't work. Most go over via planes. We can have pro life supreme…
- I don't see how lowering taxes, building up the military, building a wall (Mexico won't pay for it.) The Tax Foundation expects 2 to 3 trillion added to the debt. Some economists also put it up as high as 10 trillion, which is more than Obama had alone. Then for abortion we…
- 3110.
Donald Trump would be a good president
For
- Well. Have a great day.YOU CAN'T STUMP THE TRUMP
- FANTASTIC. I guess I'll extend my arguments in hopes that you come back. If not, it won't be the first time someone has called me out then run away or forgotten about calling me out.
Against
- I read your statement on whether he should be elected. I understand your view. But this man takes it to the extremes. I know A am young, and my opinions are not worth much in the open world(I'm 15) but on here, they are relevant. So you must listen to me when I say this. This…
- 3111.
All guns should be banned
For
- We should ban guns as that means there will be no more gun crimes. We have banned cocaine and there is no more cocaine in this country. Including myth, marijuana...... Drinking and driving is outlawed. I am glad I don't see on the news of drunken driving murders anymore. This…
- We tell the people that guns are banned and I know those hardened criminals will understand and comply and register their weapons the same day the announcement is made. And we should proudly put signs on our windows and front lawn indicating that we are anti-gun and you may not…
Against
- I will respectfully disagree with your statement. I think us, as American citizens should be able to feel protected. For many reasons such as: The right was granted in our constitution. As an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense, resistance to…
- New to the site and have found a passion for debating. I would like to improve my debate skills.This one is a serious, but mostly just for fun and help me improve. I would like to debate with a pro-gun ban leaning person. I will not be disrespectful or call you any names. I…
- 3112.
The United States is on the verge of civil war
For
- yes i have, People used to be able to sit down to thanksgiving dinner with members of their family of all shades of ideology and party, There are numerous reports that the polarized nature of public dialogue has effected holiday dinners people will no longer be in the same room…
- okay give it a stab. . Angry minorities angry women, Gender gap antifa. . Far right terrorism in synogogues that pipe bomb stuff, , And the inccility in our public dialogue
Against
- You are making the positive claim that the "The United States is so polarized, And the leadership so corrupt that really the only choice the majority has to restore Democracy is armed revolution! " therefore, The burden of proof lies upon you to demonstrate that your claim is…
- You haven't made any point.
- 3113.
Gun control laws should be loosened
For
- "The 23-year-old Navy officer was dead at the wheel, shot by a convicted felon out cruising the highways with two friends. They had been drinking and were looking for cheap thrills, illegally armed with a Glenfield Model 25 .22-caliber rifle and a Remington 870 12-gauge…
- Apparently you listened to nothing I said, first of all the idea that a homicidal man purchasing a weapon legally is absurd no one with a misdemeanor or any type of mental history or illness is capable of such a purchase. My argument is that we should tighten the gun purchasing…
Against
- As hard as it is for my opponent to admit he's wrong... he is, what he fails to realize is that a bullet is a bullet, it doesn't matter who shoots the gun, there will always be less harmful ways to disarm a mugger/rapist (May i suggest a tsar or mace) that are just as effective…
- although it is not an official record from a court case here is a little sip of an article that shows a illegal use of a legal gun The 23-year-old Navy officer was dead at the wheel, shot by a convicted felon out cruising the highways with two friends. They had been drinking…
- 3114.
Israel was wrong to take Palestinian land
For
- Before Jewish migration and war with the Palestinians, the Muslim population was 86 percent. Christian population 10 percent. Jewish population 4 percent. The Jews did not peacefully take Palestine. There was a war and there is still conflict today. They forcibly drove out the…
- You are correct, there never was a "state of Palestine", that was a error on my part. However, Palestinians did control modern day Israel. During Palestinian control, Israel was peaceful and almost all people there were not in conflict. It was not until the radical Jewish…
Against
- Pro did not cite any of his statistics but for arguments sake I will treat them as valid. Immigrating to a land is not an act of war on the Palestinian Arabs. And once again I need to reiterate that Palestinians never governed the land. I am well aware of the war Pro. You…
- Thank you for your response. Pro does concede to the mistake of there never being a state of Palestine. This is not a minor detail but rather the premise of the entire debate. If there was no state of Palestine, Israel couldn't have taken it. End of story. I will still address…
- 3115.
Civilian ownership of assault weapons should be banned
For
- The purpose this debate was to argue the practicality of civilian owned semi-automatic firearms which may be classified as assault weapon. Legislation, and hypothetical mass-shootings are entirely different topics. But I will say, although I believe a modern semi-automatic to…
- The term "assault weapon" is an ambiguous political term used to classify semi-automatic firearms based on superficial features which are believed to resemble those of actual military firearms. The determining features vary between governing bodies. Firearms which can be…
Against
- I should have stated this in the previous round, but I am not a gun expert so I'm not hip with the lingo used in the gun community.Anyways let's continue. Based on your most recent argument, the only advantage these weapons have over others is that it's easier to kill people…
- The problem with these guns lies right in the title. "Assault" weapons. They are designed to kill people, which is why they are used so often in the military. Regular US citizens who aren't in the military do not have a need for such high powered weapons. Ordinary rifles that…
- 3116.
The United States should fast-track immigration requests from Mexican nationals relocating to Texas
For
- To begin with, I will address my opponent's assertion that "Allowing illegal immigrants to then make their way into Texas faster would cause (the number of unemployed) to rise. " Actually, I did not propose that illegal immigrants should be allowed to make their way into Texas,…
- In my opinion, with the possible exception of Oklahoma, you won't find a more impressive state anywhere between Albuquerque and New Orleans than Texas. This state has so much to offer visitors and residents alike and I am very confident that many unemployed Mexicans would be as…
Against
- First let me apologize for accidentally using the phrase illegal immigrants instead of mexicans. That was a mistake but the Pro did not offer an argument about how unemployment would rise.... Mexicans are hard workers on average as a population, but not all mexicans are…
- The current Texas unemployment rate is sitting at 8.5%..... That is actually pretty bad because when the economy of a nation is strong then unemployment usually sits below 5%...... Allowing illegal immigrants to then make their way into Texas faster would cause that number to…
- 3117.
Obama has not fulfilled his duties as president
For
- Obama has obviously not fulfilled his duties as president. Yes, I do agree that it was a major accomplishment to take out Osama Bin Laden, but that is about all he has done. If you haven't noticed, we are in about 17 billion, 384 Million dollars in debt. He also is losing…
Against
- I continue to await your response :)
- I await your response. :)
- 3118.
The United States should split into two countries
For
- Vote for me
- No?
Against
- I)The United States would be torn apart by a second bloody civil war II)Many states not in so called Dixie have powerful military and naval capabilities Ex: San Diego III)Millions of refugees would flood the Canadian Border seeking refuge from a violent civil war.
- 3119.
The US should ban private gun ownership
For
- We never finished this debate the last time. I accept again.
Against
- Summary: --Lotts data John Lott is the founder of the more guns less crime debate in the modern era. His 1997 is the most comprehensive study on the issues on conceal carry. He found large decreases in violent crime with the passage of these laws. The study, however, didn't go…
- Conduct con, though I am 100% sure my opponent will make a showing next round.
- 3120.
Immigration is good for Western countries
For
- I think immigration is a good option because noone wants to do the jobs they do noone wants to run a one dollar store and noone wants to clean our schools
Against
- Thank you, MultiCulturalism, for instigating this debate. Immigration is, overall, a bad idea for any country, let alone the West. Let me show you.Negation CasePremise: What is immigration?The definition I will be using for immigration is: "the action of coming to live…
- Extend.
- 3121.
The ACA should be replaced with single-payer healthcare
For
- I'm not sure if I'm doing this right... I believe in a single payer healthcare system first and foremost, because I believe that healthcare is human right and not just a privilege for the rich. I believe that it is wrong that some of the wealthiest Americans can get the best…
- I believe that we should replace Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly referred to as "Obamacare", should be replaced by some form or variation of a single-payer healthcare system.
Against
- First and foremost: If you are not sure you are doing this right: Research previous debates Read any FAQ sections available Ask community members any further questions you may have Questions still outstanding? Fake it til you break it brother...or until you figure it out.…
- Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to debate this topic with you.For this debate, I will be arguing against the implimentation of a single-payer healthcare system within the United States of America.To the Pro: Good luck, and good debating.
- 3122.
Not all terrorists are Muslims
For
- All the terrorists in the world are not muslims. Their names are used for suppressing the rumours. Being an Indian and an Hindu, I strongly say that not all the muslims are terrorists and vice versa. The terrorist activities happen all over the world due lack of love towards…
Against
- RESOLUTION NEGATEDVOTE CON
- RESOLUTION NEGATED
- 3123.
Immigrants should not be allowed into Europe
For
- But the thing is that they are only going in 1st world countries and want perfect life with money and easy education. While some countries in Europe don't have that things. Why don't they go to some other Islam country and continue living there. But NO they don't want to be…
- I live in a country that was made by war,destroyed by war,reformed by war and is a nationalist country(Serbia).In the war of Yugoslavia Serbia was fighting against Bosnia and Croatia and of course civilians were harmed and killed. My family was living in Croatia but were Serbs.…
Against
- It is definitely not so that every Syrian refugee has fled to a 1st world country as you are claiming. As I already stated, a total of 4.8 million people have fled from Syria and only 627.000 of those (13% of the total) have risked their lives and their lives of their children…
- The UN special envoy for Syria estimated that 400,000 people have been killed throughout the past five years of civil war. To escape the fighting, 4.8 million people fled Syria and became refugees. Of these, about 627.000 have risked their lives and their lives of their…
- 3124.
Conservatives should not support Trump's economic policies
For
- even those links about growth v tax cuts admit that revenue would not be neutral or go up for the government... it would go down to the tune of a trillion a year. again, that's a short term solution even if it provides growth it has to be made up for later. i might be able to…
- when you talk about things like immigration, you are talking about things incidental to economics. it's not a main point. but onto your points. simplifying the tax code he's just going to lower taxes, that doesn't change the tiered structure or really simply anything over how…
Against
- You are using Bush conservative standards, not Trump conservative. This is not Mitt Romney's, John McCain, or the Bushes party any more its, Donald Trumps. Here is the link for competitively priced medicaid (http://money.cnn.com...) What it comes down to for conservatives is…
- First and Foremost Trump Conservatives are not Bush conservatives, Bush conservatives are Liberal Democrats who support Israel so they became Republicans. Trump conservatives are America First, Not ideology first. When you are looking at his tax plan, with out economic growth…
- 3125.
Democratic socialism would improve on capitalism and social democracy
For
- For this last round I'll begin by tackling Con's points in round 4 before making my final plea! Con attacks direct democracy on the basis of its inefficiency – the example of Switzerlandshould be enough to refute this, but even if direct democracy did hurt efficiency, it would…
- Thanks to Con for a great critique in the last round – I appreciate the space constraints and will refrain from further criticism of social democracy until he has made his defence. For this round I will simply respond to Con's critiques of democratic socialism. Issues around…
Against
- I think that most of the points pro made were discussed earlier so I will just conclude my arguments here. Over this debate, I tried to paint a picture of what an ideal social democracy would look like as well as point out the flaws of democratic socialism compared to social…
- Thanks to Pro for allowing me a little more time to respond to earlier criticisms before moving on to new ones. I will first address the criticisms made by my opponent in round 3 and then I will point out some flaws in the responses he made to my criticisms in round 4. The…
- 3126.
War is a justified solution to serious conflicts
For
- here are the points which con is asking for - Post War time periods establish a balance of power creating peace through necessity. Tried to bring peace and prosperity in the 1920's, but it didn't work. Wars forces economic growth through a nation's conquests . For the most part…
- i agree with the con but thats the fact i was telling the fact with which everyone satisfies and now i going to tell which everyone do not get - 1) the development of the japan as a developed country after world war 2 http://en.wikipedia.org... - proves my statement
Against
- Obviously I'm going to rebut his points and, because he has the burden of proof as the affirmation, you vote negative by default. First and foremost, PRO plagiarized the entirety of what he has laid out here today from this debate: .…
- "i agree with the con but thats the fact i was telling the fact with which everyone satisfies and now i going to tell which everyone do not get."This statement is not written in coherent English. I haven't the slightest idea of what he's saying because he isn't writting…
- 3127.
The words 'under God' should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance
For
- If it makes them uncomfortable, they can excuse themselves from the room. Teachers must allow that.
- Agreed, if people were forced to say "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, that would be violating their First Amendment rights. But the fact is they aren't. In schools, students have the option to abstain from the entire pledge or two omit parts of it. This case has already…
Against
- true but just the fact that the atheist have to hear it makes them uncomfortable
- keeping the words under god goes against the first amendment
- 3128.
Nuclear disarmament is a bad idea
For
- You say that "Even they keep the nuclear weapons and don't use it now, they will still use it someday in the future". Nuclear weapons have not been used in the last 67 years, and the safe-guards preventing accidental use are only getting stronger, meaning that with every year…
- Since the end of the Cold War many have argued that we no longer need nuclear weapons. This holds particular sway in Britain where right now the Government is considering a non-nuclear replacement for Trident. However, since the fall of the Soviet Union new threats have…
Against
- You said that nuclear weapons have not been used in the last 67 years, but that is not neccessary. The countries that keep the nuclear weapons have lost some of them. USA has already lost a nuclear bomb. Russia and USA both have a missing submarine with the nuclear weapons. The…
- I don't agree with you. Weapons are made for defending and attacking, no mater what kind of weapon. Even they keep the nuclear weapons and don't use it now, they will still use it someday in the future. But if none of the countries keep that, although there's a war between…
- 3129.
America is becoming more like Nazi Germany
For
- The final nail in the coffin of democracy and justice was hammered into place with the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act. NDAA allows for the U.S. military to arrest, imprison, and torture American citizen without due process of any kind. Contemporary America…
- America Is Rapidly Becoming More Like Nazi Germany I will be arguing that the US is becoming like Nazi Germany The United States of America is becoming more like Nazi Germany every single day. Most Americans simply have never learned what life was really like back in Nazi…
Against
- America is not becoming more like Nazi Germany. The difference between the United States (and to that extent, any other modern 1st world country) and Nazi Germany is that the latter was defined by it's Nazism beliefs rather than by economic principals. Adolf Hitler preached…
- Where to even begin... Let's ignore the fact the my opponent in no way whatsoever refuted my last argument for a moment. We shall look at my opponent's most recent argument. He blamed science for the loss of faith in Christianity which is the stabilizing force in the world. Now…
- 3130.
Saudi Arabia should become a democratic nation
For
- Ok, just challenge me whenever.
- You've still got a round to be an apologist for fascism.
Against
- I apologize for the forfeit. Final exams are next week and I am canceling all of my debates. After exams are over I will challenge you to debate the same topic.
- 1. "I'm assuming that Con will have to show that the current system is acceptable compared to democracy and its tenets, which form the basis of any civilisation."Here my opponent attempts to shift BOP to me. This is fallacious, as I have illustrated in my opening. My opponent…
- 3131.
The military should not have removed Morsi from power
For
- Glad to see that Bench is going to debate me seriously. This should be a great debate then!I. Respect for Institutions and the Law Whether the people of Egypt liked it or not Morsi was elected legitimately by an election from the people. The very foundation of all strong…
- Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt who was recently deposed by the military at the request of the "people" should not have been removed.First round is for acceptance.No semantics.Good luck.
Against
- I. Respect for Institutions and the Law " The very foundation of all strong democracies is the trust and legitimacy of elections and the electoral process"Not true. The foundation of strong democracies depends entirely on the checks and balances enforced on all branches of the…
- I'm going to do the last thing anyone would expect me to do on here..... I'm going to debate..... Seriously O_O I accept, state your case
- 3132.
An atheist should not be elected president of the United States
For
- Recently, republican Ben Carson has stated that no Muslim should ever be president. Or he said something like that. I would take it a step further and say that atheists should never be President of the United States. Why? 1. Our country was founded on Christian/religious…
- First I would like to ask my opponent to read my response two or three times before responding. He still does not get what is being argued and has not even tried to understand anything that I have written. I have never had this problem before and I have used this same argument…
Against
- The burden of proof is solely on my opponent, as they are arguing for a change and going against the current norm. R1: America was founded on Christian/religious principalsMy opponent has given his example of the declaration of independence, however he hasn't said why that…
- To start off I would like to say that my opponent never fully specified what he meant by the resolution, leaving it open to interpretation. It's very easy to think that by saying "an atheist shouldn't become president" is equivalent to Ben Carson saying "a muslim shouldn't…
- 3133.
War does more good than harm
For
- I cant be bothered to debate . Next debate I will actually research.
- War. All in all if has caused geneside,murder and destroyed great cities. However this cost is mere compared to all the lives it has benefited. Penicillin was the first mass produced drug in the world and was mass produced in war to save soldiers at the front. Since then has…
Against
- OK then.
- Agreed. Than I will make certain about other things. First of all, the fact involving vaccines is wrong. Vaccines have existed since the 1700's, 1800's, and 1900's. Penicillin wasn't actually discovered until 1928, after World War I. Not only such, but showing from your history…
- 3134.
Right-wing governments are less moral than left-wing governments
For
- I know this round isn't the place for rebuttals, but I have one thing I need to say about a point my opponent made.1) After doing some research, I came to remember something the the Nazis. The word Nazi means Nationalsozialismus, or National Socialism (1). Nazism, is a…
- 1) Right-Winged governments, like Fascism, is rather new as well. These issues are mostly cultural. Remember that if we assume Far-Right governments exist long before, we must accept that it was Far-Right Governments that ended slavery. As for American slavery, I can agree with…
Against
- It was fun. Conclusion: As the debate has shown, both Right-Winged and Left-Winged governments are able to be equally less moral than the other, but which one is least moral depends on who is watching. Some would consider the 3 Generations of Punishment to be less moral than…
- Argument I: Right-Winged Governments v Left-Winged Governments.Pro is still saying that because Nazi Germany had slaves, that Slave is a Right-Winged-only issue. No, North Korea even has slaves (the people in the 3 Generations of Punishment). One would argue that everyone in…
- 3135.
The United States should launch military action against ISIS
For
- Thanks for accepting. Constructive The United States should engage in a war against ISIS for two major reasons, Contention 1: ISIS is killing not only United States Citizens but Citizens world wide. Enough is enough. The fact that US citizens are being killed, more like…
- Please only accept if you're going to debate without any forfeits. Forfeit by either side results in automatic loss. Definitions ISIS- Refers to the terrorist group that rose to prominence this summer, taking over parts of Iraq and Syria, declaring a new caliphate and killing…
Against
- Lol don't be silly now we aint need nother war :) vote 4 me peace
- war sis for issies. Don't war againtst people thank Sorr But
- 3136.
The Republican Party's religious policies harm society
For
- My opponent says that humans cannot have worth under secular principals. Does that mean that he would commit murder, rape, or robbery if he knew that no God existed? He also seems to think that we need "moral codes based on religion" to make society civilized. Civilized society…
- My opponent begins the second round by agreeing that the "Establishment Clause of the First Amendment" prohibits the government from forcing religion onto people. Then he turns around and makes the following statements which I will refute one by one: STATEMENT #1: "People may…
Against
- My opponent started by answering my question about proving humans have worth under secular principles. No this does not mean I would necessarily commit crimes if I knew God did not exist. It is in the nature of every human being to believe that there is a way that things ought…
- Start in the middle of my last post where I asked my opponent to prove that humans have worth. He did not do so. So he has failed to prove to you that under secular principles humans have worth. This takes out all of his arguments because when humans do not have worth then…
- 3137.
Party affiliation should disqualify candidates from government office
For
- Whatever, c*nt
- blah blah blah its like im talking to a f*cking brick wall. forget it
Against
- My opponent has resorted to name calling now. I believe I should be voted for with arguments, because I actually offered something besides just opinion, as well as awarded conduct.
- What, were you expecting me to concede this easily? You offered no good argument so far. You haven't even proved your claims that they disregard the working class and minorities. I would agree with you, but you have offered weak points so far. I'm not just a brick wall, I do…
- 3138.
Obama's presidency was good for America on balance
For
- even what con found to be the source of the study the oregon experiment showed things like diabetes detection and management. it is simple. all con's wordy bluster is a way to deny common sense. without health insurance or coverage you die, or at least regulations. if you have…
- i wish con would have started into his arguments more that the free market would properly take care of healthcare, so that we can delve into it all sooner than later. cause you can count me as prime skeptical. free markets leads to people not having health care, and thus they…
Against
- Pro initially states that Obamacare (in this case medicaid expansion) will save thousands of lives in Florida alone, but when challenged, dropped that. Instead, Pro's support of Obamacare relies on an increase in diabetes detection. It's not surprising that testing and…
- Clarification My free market discussion not a counter plan, but rather a framework to show that government involvement in health care cannot improve our lives. Rebuttals Pro states this is simple: no government health care plan = no insurance = people die. I will show…
- 3139.
Donald Trump's policies will lead to fascism in America
For
- My opponent seems to have 'peaced out', So I will be leaving this debate here unless they come back, However another person has challenged my views on this topic which I will link here. https://www. Debate. Org/debates/why-I-am-ignorant-to-this-debate/1/ Thank you kindly
- The first thing we must do is define what Fascism, A expression which has changed since Mussolini first theorised it; it is important to note that the Nazis were in fact technically not fascists despite the common misconception, They were national socialists, Donald trump…
Against
- I fail to understand why you would even begin to think this. What it means to be a "Fascist Nation" is that he would have total control over the government, The people, Over everything. And this would never even work in the first place, Because first off he would have to change…
- 3140.
The CIA was right to torture terrorists
For
- We have established that the CIA did in fact use harsh interrogation methods. These methods yielded credible information. [1] If this did in fact yield credible information, then why should they not use it? Using harsh methods may seem like overkill, but the rewards are far…
- I wish to contend that the CIA was right in the usage of harsh interrogation methods. If you do not know of this, here is a link: . http://www.bbc.com... I would prefer facts mentioned to be attributed to their source. Good luck and have fun!
Against
- extend
- I'd like to define "harsh interrogation methods" as it is. Torture. There is no if and or buts about it. Even in the report my opponent sources, it's defined as torture. This is not a debatable issue. It is concrete. This issue where our government acted unlawfully. To go in…
- 3141.
Donald Trump should be the next US president
For
- This debate will be on whether or not Donald Trump is well-suited to be our next commander-in-chief. This is not a debate on who might be better than Trump, so please don't suggest another candidate. I am on the pro side, and will be debating the person on the con side.
Against
- I accept your challenge. Since the burden of proof is on you to prove why he is best suited and why is policies are good, it lies on me only to refute your claims. And actually you saying that it is not a debate on the person who is better than Trump goes against your own…
- ...okay then
- 3142.
Cuba should be removed from the US state sponsors of terrorism list
For
- DEFINITIONS: (1): Con agrees that Russia should be on the list under his framework. True, this debate is centered around Cuba and not Russia, but this is a point that should be evaluated at the end of the round if con attempts to use his FW as justification for Cuba being on…
- DEFINITIONS: Sponsor/International Terrorism - the con has given the definition, he must stick by it until the end of this debate, that means no changes. ONE - The definition of the Con's "international terrorism"/ sponsor is flawed. On the ground that we use this definition,…
Against
- FRAMEWORK 1. Pro agrees that this debate is about Cuba. So, as I said earlier, "it's not my job to argue that the list is comprehensive and perfect; my only job is to assert that Cuba should be on it, regardless of what other state might or might not be included. " Therefore,…
- I will address the framework, then I will defend my own case, and conclude by addressing Pro's case. DEFINITIONS Pro makes two points here: (1) that Russia should be included under my interpretation of the resolution. This is true--but at the same time Russia DOES sponsor…
- 3143.
Gun rights protect citizens from government tyranny
For
- Clarifications Rebuttal "I have not explicitly nor implicitly branded you, my opponent, as an NRA affiliate or a conspiracy theorist" -Just by bringing it to the surface in this debate, you have done just that. Anyone with a predisposed problem with the NRA could make a…
- Now, towards the point. "The thought that the government is trying to remove the second amendment is a gross misinterpretation of government reactions on the recent shooting tragedies. Such thinking can be likened to those NRA spoon-fed crazy conspiracy theorists who believe…
Against
- Well my opponent has failed to sufficiently refute my contentions and rebuttals, I will state counter rebuttals for my opponent's rebuttals that are relevant to the resolution.Counter rebuttals1. Pro sees fit to "refute" clarifications which are unnecessary since the…
- Let me clarify myself on several points before moving on to rebuttals.Clarifications1. I have not explicitly nor implicitly branded you, my opponent, as an NRA affiliate or a conspiracy theorist. However, I have shot down the plausibility of a possible Government take over on…
- 3144.
The 2015 Iran nuclear deal was good for the world
For
- I will be making the case that Iran Nuclear Deal is beneficial.
- It seems my opponent has left. While this may be the case, it does not seem right to upset the balance of the argument by introducing new points.
Against
- Okay the Iran nuclear deal is a bad idea for many reasons. First off, the framework would provide monitors unfettered access to "declared" nuclear sites, but affords Iran 24 days to push back on a request to inspect "undeclared," or military, sites. So, Iran will be able to…
- Okay!
- 3145.
Republicans balance federal budgets better than Democrats
For
- The last Republican president who ever balanced the budget was Dwight Eisenhower.Between 1998 and 2000, President Bill Clinton"s Treasury Department paid off more than $360 billion in debt. As a result of 115 straight months of economic expansion that began after an increase in…
Against
- Pro copied most of his case from a blog post without giving the source. He forfeited two rounds.I thoroughly refuted Pro's case, and he provided no rebuttal.Pro provided no sources for his most important contentions, while I provided thorough sourcing for my contentions. Pro's…
- Pro seemed so hyped-up in his beliefs that I thought he would want to defend them.It turns out that most of Pro's case is copied from a blog post entitled "The Big Lie of the Day: Republicans Balance Federal Budgets" [12. http://www.nationalmemo.com...] The blog post appeared…
- 3146.
People should boycott Israel over its treatment of Palestinians
For
- "Israel as a country has done nothing wrong against the palestinians." I will challenge this false statement with providing arguments on how the Israeli Government has committed many atrocities against the Palestinians. Note(I do not hold any grudge against the Israeli people,…
- This debate however is about human rights. I have stated studies that have proven that Israel has committed atrocities against the Palestinian people. I do not hold any prejudice against the Israeli people, but its government. I would like to gather all of the studies that…
Against
- Israel as a country has done nothing wrong against the palestinians. The argument for BDS is generally that the Israeli army is inhumanely bombing civilian areas in the West Bank and Gaza. This is false, these areas are terrorist controlled and are generally using civilians as…
- In opening of my final statement to the voters I would like to clarify my position as Con for "Should people boycott Israel for inhumane acts against arabs". My position is that Israel as a country has not committed war crimes or incredibly discriminatory acts acts against…
- 3147.
Immigration from Muslim-majority countries should be banned in Europe
For
- Yes, Gladly.
- I myself live in Europe, And have a direct view of the daily life here. One of the first thing I notice is that people who identify themselves as "Muslim", Are the same people who cause a lot of crime for a relatively small group. 70% of prisoners in French jails are Muslim…
Against
- I win
- My point is your logic is fundamentally flawed. Islam is a religion. There are billions of muslims. You have native Europeans who are muslims. Are you gonna kick out your own brothers and sisters?
- 3148.
The United States should allow immigration
For
- Immigrants should be allowed in the united states because they are good at working. Immigrants have taken up the bad jobs so that we don't need to take them. GO IMMIGRANTS!!!
- Immigrants help the economy and the population.
Against
- If you eat an immigrant then he will sew you. I think that immigrants should be legel, I am immigrant and so parents are and i come from the mexico and think that many immigrants should be legeal as long as they not wear pants
- 3149.
Church and state should be strictly separated
For
- I extend my arguments, and submit that they affirm the resolution. I would like to thank Guidestone for conceding, rather than simply forfeiting, and I thank him for 4 delightful rounds. Maybe we can rehash this issue at some later time.
- Thanks again to Guidestone! I will use this round to conduct a line-by-line rebuttal of Con's claims thus far. P1: The Nature of the Establishment ClauseI shall place Con's remarks in italics. My rebuttals shall be in regular script, as before."This is separation of Church from…
Against
- I would like to continue this maybe during spring break, as it is a topic I must look up a lot about since I don't know much right off hand, so I need lots of time.
- I am sorry, but I literally have no time to finish this debate. If at a later point if you would want to redo this debate when I am more free I would be glad to. This has become more of a burden, and I have more important things that are occupying my time, so I concede to my…
- 3150.
Welfare is modern-day slavery
For
- I have found from personal experience that many people that receive benefits have zero motivation to separate themselves from them. Moreover, they are motivated to continue receiving them. If a 25 year old single mother living in "the hood" receives $600 per month in food…
- It's very simple and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. Welfare is and has been a crutch for a long time particularly in the black community. When you have people proud of getting food stamp so that they can "sell" them to others for profit, then we have a problem. When we…
Against
- extended
- C1) SemanticsSlavery: "the condition of a slave; bondage." (dictionary.com)Slave: "a person who is the property of and wholly subject to another; a bond servant." (dictionary.com)Any reliable definition of slavery would show definitively that welfare is not a form of slavery.…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?