Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 39
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1901.
Development aid should take priority over military stabilization
For
- Closing: I would first like to point out that the CON has failed time and time again to argue my most important point, that attempts at military stabilisation don't achieve anything beyond chaos and instability and historically have never achieved anything beyond chaos and…
- Rebuttal No.1- contention A1: Firstly, as has been proven time and time again throughout history, military stabilisation does not work. Attempts at military stabilisation would only exacerbate violence and terrorism in said region. * I also don't see the relevance of Lesley Ann…
Against
- I should have added an extra round to defend, my fault. In closing, The judges can see by my three contentions and the attempt to call into question their relevance by PRO that while the PRO would stand had he not have forgotten one thing which I have attempted to make…
- My rebuttal will consist of the conflict of each contention. I don't have a lot of time or energy right now, so it won't be perfect. Reb. 1 You are predicating this argument on the assumption that I am arguing the extreme. The stated resolve is that of priority. Not exclusive…
- 1902.
Welfare programs are inconsistent with individual liberty
For
- You are correct that the degree to which we must give is the big question. But that amount is based on how much the governement believes it is required to spend. Therefore, the government should do its very best make sure it is spending as little as possible and in such a way…
- Ron Paul is considered "crazy" because he is in the very small minority. He's actually consistent. Everyone thinks he is some renegage or brilliant free thinker because he's consistent. Today that causes controversy. Unfortunate. First of all, you did not rebut my claim that…
Against
- The reason that I pointed out that welfare is a safety-net, one that is necessary, is to point out the difference. It is not charity. It is a government policy that is in place to save the bottom X% of our society from some of the negatives of a capitalist market system. If we…
- Hi, I accepted your debate because I have recently been taking a class on international political economy, and this topic comes up frequently (especially from those crazy Ron Paul people, just kidding... not really). First of all, the idea that welfare is a form of forced…
- 1903.
The government should grow larger
For
- Between 1941 to 1973 the top tax rate was between 75 and 94% yet we experienced redord econmic growth in that period
- well are they not self evident, Why do you think people are complaining so loudly theres your proof, Discontant
Against
- Pro has put forth these points from round 1 #1. . Our educational system does not serve the whole population #2. . . Our health care system does not serve the whole population #3. . . We need higher taxes, #4. . . We need More socialistic policies within a market system #5. . .…
- Pro has these points #1. . Our educational system does not serve the whole population #2. . . Our health care system does not serve the whole population #3. . . We need higher taxes, #4. . . We need More socialistic policies within a market system #5. . . Therefore we need a…
- 1904.
Health care and education should not be rights
For
- Since I had an opponent drop out I guess I need to edit this. I argue that heath care/education is not a right. In order for something to be a right, everyone must be able to exercise the "right" at the exact same time. Rules: First round you must accept AND add in your…
- I must reject Cons argument that the constitution or law for that matter gives us any rights at all. The constitution or any "legal" document has no authority or obligation at all, unless between man and man. There is not enough space to go into how the constitution is a…
Against
- Accepted. To begin with, I reject Pro's argument that "In order for something to be a right, everyone must be able to exercise the "right" at the exact same time." There are many constitutionally protected rights that cannot be exercised by everyone at the same time. With…
- In the last round, my opponent articulated at least a partial theory of rights, based on the idea that rights are grounded in the physical ability of people to perform actions - these actions are then "rights," like the "rights" to speak, walk, grow food, etc. that my opponent…
- 1905.
Affirmative action should be ended
For
- It is criticized that affirmative action is a form of reverse discrimination; affirmative action keeps societies aware of the barriers that divide it and actually perpetuates alienation and resentment between ethnically diverse groups, thus increasing rather than reducing…
- although is true that affirmative action is way to prevent discrimination in many institutions, i believe there are different ways that can be more effective in providing everyone with the same opportunities. i am not saying that every one in a particular culture is just…
Against
- Affirmative Action aims at ending previously done discrimination not continuing to discriminate. Affirmative Action does not serve as a free pass to minorities but instead an aid to reaching a desired out come. Without the assistance of Affirmative Action these outcomes may…
- While it's true that some individuals may take advantages of programs aimed at aiding them, aided programs prove to be more beneficial to the people who truly need it then to the people abusing the aid. Affirmative Action aims at evening the already biased playing field that…
- 1906.
Labour would govern Britain better than the Conservatives
For
- It was amazing to meet you, I'm honoured to meet such a good debater. But i know to always question things and never stick with one side permanently regardless of what happens.
- ORKEYYY, Thanks you've changed my perspective. I live alot around my Grandma who is pro-labour so idk what to believe but was trying to go off my own mind instead of copying things she said. I'm usually good at debating just it was first time didn't know what to say was cba for…
Against
- Coolio
- I am SOOOOO happy that you are open to new perspectives. I encourage you to do some digging of your own and come with your own conclusion because I could totally find things that support what you are saying. Its important however to understand both sides of an argument. This is…
- 1907.
Socialism is a better system of government than capitalism
For
- I suppose that I may be able to try with the time I possess to deliver an argument. Socialism Basics Socialism operates under the general means in which humans and citizens run the services (i.e. electricity) rather then buying them from companies. This also means that they do…
- Unfortunately, I have real things to do. I am very, very sorry for any time I have wasted. I was new here and was not ready.
Against
- All points extended.
- My opponent's last round was fundimentally flawed and must be thrown out of the debate. In the comments section he permitted me to use Anarcho-Capitalism, but then my opponent, in his last round, argued for Democratic Socialism, not Socialism. What's the difference you may ask?…
- 1908.
The world should abolish nuclear weapons
For
- Nuclear weapons can be abolished through the co-operation of nuclear powers and the establishment of an independent verification system
- Risk of nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands
Against
- Abolishment is an unrealistic goal
- Abolishment would be counter-productive and only lead to greater barbarity in warfare
- 1909.
Law enforcement officials are too power-hungry
For
- The police force now seems to be stomping on every right that we as Americans have. They seem to think that they own the U.S. and that everyone should follow their rules but they do not need to follow their own rules. I will allow my opponent to begin the arguments. Good luck.
Against
- Concluded. Either they are not power hungry enough, or they just made my opponent disappear.
- Extend.
- 1910.
Russia is livable despite its nuclear arsenal
For
- Both of my opponents argument show no evidence and therefore, are just like forfeitures. Futhermore, Russia is clearly liveable as its population is at an astounding 142 Million and growing! http://en.wikipedia.org... Therefore, if 141 million people are living fine and well in…
- I will wait for my opponent to begin.
Against
- nuclear waste everywhere i doubt anything could survive that has to breath or eat
- russia is unlivable due to the fact that every step you take is into a pool of radition due to the fact that russians dont care about anything so they decide to dump all there toxic waste into the streets and carelessly launch their WMD anywhere they fell like it.
- 1911.
Central Africa should receive the most foreign aid
For
- "Why would 'many' people say that central isn't as deserving as other? May be it isn't if so many think that way." Central has the same problems as any other region. Many of the regions are recognized for having problems that stand out, but each region basically has the same…
- The title was a misnomer, I guess. At the beginning, I believe I said: "Many people will disagree and say that a different region of Africa needs help." I was hoping you'd kind of pick up on the fact that I'm talking about Central out of all of the other REGIONS in Africa. "I…
Against
- ""Many people will disagree and say that a different region of Africa needs help." Why would "many" people say that central isn't as deserving as other? May be it isn't if so many think that way. "These days, Africa is constantly in the spotlight for corruption, economic…
- Since my opponent has not replied with an argument, I will restate my side. Central Africa is NOT the Region That Should Recieve the Most Help. I don't believe that one region deserves more help than another, but they should recieve help based on their conditions and problems.…
- 1912.
Abkhazia and South Ossetia should not be independent from Georgia
For
- This being the last round of our debate, I shall address the issues for the last time. === Historical Background === I am not trying to confuse anyone by misexplaining the definition of a legitimate state. The point I am doing here is that the world does not work in a single…
- I apologize for not answering to the third round - I explained myself in the comments: I had tests to prepare - and thank JBlake for such a polite response to my mistake. I now have to prove why JBlake's opinion, even though well-argumented, is wrong. So, here is a summary of…
Against
- Good in the voting, but not too much luck! === Historical Background === Despite what Pro says about a "mystical origin" requirement for Caucasus independence, there are internationally recognized methods of obtaining legitimacy. The peoples of the Caucasus region should not be…
- I hope the reader will not penalize him for missing a single round in a five round debate. There is still plenty of space for both of us to make our arguments. --------------- I will address each point in the order that Pro uses above. === Historical Background === Pro attempts…
- 1913.
The Confederate flag should be banned in public spaces
For
- "Today, it would simply represent the southern heritage and culture." Yes, the Civil war was about not only slavery, but the southern way of life-- which involved slavery. It was about southern economy, which was build off the back of free slave labor. This shows a willingness…
- you have yet to counter my argument, only to have added to my initial argument--a factor of states' rights. Why would we want a reminder that we had a civil war between the north and the south over slavery rights? And how does it represent people who yearned to be free? It was…
Against
- Again, slavery was just a factor. The big issue was states' rights. In the end, it is good that the Union won (I oppose slavery and I am not racist), but the Confederacy had a good case. Their economy and way of life depended on agriculture, unlike the Union's. A…
- I will not deny the fact that slavery and segregation existed. I may be a Confederate, but I am not racist. Many people believe that the South seceded primarily over slavery. However, that is incorrect. The Confederacy was formed upon the principle of state sovereignty and the…
- 1914.
The US Constitution authorizes federal assistance for the less fortunate
For
- 1. We are all going to have to assume that you have retreated from your previous statement regarding the "...many constitutional bonds restricting the federal government from helping the poor." Since I challenged you to name one that specifically did that and you failed to do…
- 1. "There are many constitutional bonds restricting the federal government from helping the poor." Please name one that specifically restricts helping the poor. 2. The constitution specifically says "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and…
Against
- There are many constitutional bonds restricting the federal government from helping the poor. There is no power to create such programs even barely mentioned in the constitution. The neccessary and proper clausesays that Congress has the right "To make all Laws which shall be…
- 1.Because the constitution does not give the goverment the power to create welfare, the government doesn't have that power. The definition of welfare is different now than it was when the constitution was written. It meant prosperity and well-being when the constitution was…
- 1915.
Socialism is impossible to implement on a large scale
For
- Reversion to a pseudo-Private property model instead of a Central or truly Social/Communal ownership of property means your system seems much closer to being capitalist than socialist. There is still a property owning class, Although you could argue that their ownership of the…
- ""socialism has never worked anywhere. " To that I say, Neither has unregulated capitalism. Like "socialist" societies" Perhaps unregulated Capitalism has only existed in the poverty ridden places, But that statement does nothing to support the claim that capitalism hasn't…
Against
- The center of my argument is a specific definition of socialism. In my version, The worker is entitled to the goods and services he or she produces. This is in contrast with the capitalistic model, In which the owner is entitled to those products. Capitalism is really two…
- I'll start with something slightly off topic, Just because your claim reminds me of the old canard that "socialism has never worked anywhere. " To that I say, Neither has unregulated capitalism. Like "socialist" societies, Unregulated capitalism exist only in conditions of…
- 1916.
Public bodies should publish information by default
For
- A faster, cheaper and simpler process
- Compelling public bodies to publish information ensures that non-citizens, minors, foreign nationals and others have access to information that affects them.
Against
- Public bodies require the ability to discuss proposals freely away from public scrutiny
- It is reasonable that people have access to information that effects them personally but not information that relates to their neighbours', employers', former-partners' or other citizens who maythose who work for public bodies.
- 1917.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do
For
- Unfortunately I don't have time to post this round (lots of work and things) so I would appreciate if my opponent could post his next argument but leave it blank so that I can arrive back in a couple of daysd to post round 4. Sorry!!
- Firstly, under Saddam Hussein, Iraq was one of the worst (in my opinion, the worst) countries to live in. Routine torture, amputation, branding, executions at which the (usually petty) criminal's family were forced at gunpoint to applaud and the secret police raping & maiming…
Against
- Extend my arguments to this round.
- That fine. I look forward to hearing from you then.
- 1918.
Marxism is on the rise again
For
- -Either way I have forbidden the use of that language, and telling me that I "jerk off" is considered as a profane language. Either way, my opponent hasn't posted his argument, he is continuing to post counterarguments. I have also noticed that you have ignored some of my…
- -My opponenet has lost the debate according to the rules. My opponenet has been using excessive profanities, such as, "jerk it to Karl Marx's picture all day" and " The onlything thats rising is that thing in my pants." My opponent was supposed to write out an argument NOT the…
Against
- I didn't say you jerked it. Idk if you even have a pen1s. But I saying that French philosopher is sdoing it. Thus I still am good under rules. And my argument against it was within round 2 rebuttals.
- A profanitey is using vulger langauge. I did not use any type of bad language just suggestive. One can use all the words like "jerk" and "pants" and no one will get mad, ohhh but put them togeather and we have pro throwing a fit. Why would you prove marxism is on the rise by…
- 1919.
Voting should be mandatory in the United States
For
- Voting must be a law because some people know who to vote for but don't have the time or cause of all the big lines, so they should make more voting posts. I think no one will have a problem with it.
Against
- Thank you for debating with me! So you say voting MUST be a law?I would like you to explain why it MUST be a law. Think of all the illeterate 18 year olds that may be forced to vote if we implement a law that makes voting compulsory
- Should the us make voting a law?You decide why it should be! I am new to debate.org and would love to have a nice debate with anyone! Not to mention, i am also in debate at school.
- 1920.
Gerrymandering fundamentally undermines democratic government
For
- As Con has failed to provide any new information to support his claim that America is more Gerrymandering than Democratic, I restate my previous arguments... Why to vote Con... Gave definitions on Gerrymandering and Democracy(definition of democracy included U.S. in it) Why to…
- This round since there has been no new information provided by Con I will rebuttal the little information she provided on Gerrymandering. According to Con, gerrymandering is the dividing of a state, or county into electoral districts that give one party a majority over the…
Against
- No, America is not a democracy. In order to adequately answer this question, it is important to understand the terms "democracy" and "gerrymandering." Here are those definitions according to Dictionary.com: Democracy: government by the people; a form of government in which the…
- America is a republic which has representatives who are democratically elected to represent the people of their geographical region. However, because politicians use gerrymandering, voting results do not always represent the majority of people in a region and make a "community…
- 1921.
The NSA has gone too far in surveillance
For
- I couldn't find any of those incidents but I'll go by your word. Okay you did prove me wrong in the fact that the NSA has stopped some incidents but a study was done out of 227 Al-Qaeda only 17 were stopped by the NSA. I just think the NSA does more harm then good. Most of the…
- I feel I own the right to privacy and I feel everyone does. My name is Ben by the way, second, I challenge you to tell my one benefit that the NSA has gotten out of spying on us. See that the NSA is the Government a d the government is owned by the people of the United States I…
Against
- Ok, let me lay down a listful of dates and facts for you. Ever since the NSA was in place many crimes and evil deeds were stopped. 2003 Layden,Washington. The NSA found out something was up and stopped it. 2005 Jizztown,VA. A building was saved due to investigation of an…
- Aight drummerbich let me tell you this in laymen's terms. You think the NSA is getting in yo bizness cus you think they be spying on all yo shyt. Well let me tell you, they be doing their job aight? They be keeping my family safe. So if yo asss got a prob with it then go tell…
- 1922.
Military force should be used if peace cannot be reached quickly
For
- By agreement this round will not be carried out.
- Touch�.
Against
- See Above Round
- In this debate I have demonstrated that advocacy of the use of NLMF is an advocacy that embraces violence as a political solution, thereby perpetuating an endless cycle of violence.
- 1923.
The Second Amendment should be strongly protected
For
- First of all regulate does not mean "to make regular" it means "regularly." so, do your homework before you before you state the facts buddy.
- look people the Second is being violated. People should have the right to bear arms. if you are attacked a gun would protect you. The criminals that use guns would ignore the law anyway. so take a side with me and say Yes to guns.
Against
- I'm not sure the judges here will take kindly to ad hominem and it is not necessary. To regulate means to make regular or "put into good order" (1) We also see in precedent with the Commerce Clause where regulation means "to make regular" commerce among the several states. (2)…
- "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." -Second Amendment of the US Constitution. Regulation means "To make regular" and Merriam-Webster defines militia as: a part of the…
- 1924.
Space should be off-limits for military purposes
For
- no need
- evolving towards peace
Against
- Why not?
- Space is already used for military purposes
- 1925.
The EU should return power to national governments
For
- Bureaucracy
- The European Union is too centralised
Against
- Power should be devolved to levels lower than the national government
- Decentralisation
- 1926.
The US Constitution should be amended to overturn Citizens United
For
- As my opponent and I have each used two rounds to post our main arguments, I will give Con the courtesy of being able to have the final word (note that I posted my first main argument in Round 1 while he waited until Round 2). With that, I ask the voters to read the full debate…
- Thanks! :D 1. Rebuttals My opponent begins Round 2 by correcting me in saying that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) applies only to electioneering, not donations. With all due respect, my opponent must understand that he/she is incorrect and the BCRA does, in fact,…
Against
- One of the greatest deceptions ever carried out on the American public is the false reporting regarding the Supreme Court Decision on Citizens United vs the FEC in 2010. People foolishly think they know what happened based solely on the reporting of talking heads in the…
- Fact: the BCRA is about imprisoning filmmakers, Writers, Publishers, Pamphleteers etc.. Db's lack of knowledge about this does not make it any less so... Proof - ( ) Db denies that he wants the administration to have the power to imprison journalists yet he admittedly wants to…
- 1927.
People should support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement
For
- The con notes that his sources are in the comments, however, the rules state that sources must be posted IN THE DEBATE. As the sources were not posted in the debate, the sources should be disregarded as such. Contention 1: International Law The Con claims that this convention…
- Contention 1: International Law and Human RightsThe Con has failed to respond to this contention and thus we can assume it has been conceded.Contention 2: South AfricaIn my opening arguments in round 2, I cited the boycott against Apartheid South Africa as an example of how…
Against
- Regarding the sources: I attempted to put them in the debate but wasn't able to and Pro's 5th rule indicates that sources can be posted in the comments. I apologize if that inconvenienced Pro or changed anything. I see it as nothing more but an inconvenience to the voters so I…
- Wow Pro is quick to respond. Sources are in the comments. Contention 1: International Law and Human Rights What Pro points out is that I didn't make a bold and underlined title of this contention. I did however partially address it. Also keep in my mind that I had to respond to…
- 1928.
Governments should provide welfare benefits
For
- welfare strives to promote the basic well-being of individuals in need. These efforts usually strive to improve the financial situation of people in need but may also strive to improve their employment chances and many other aspects of their lives. welfare helps people who…
- I will let my opponent go 1st
Against
- Pro responds by telling us what welfare aims to do; however, she fails to mention that welfare doesn't work. If it did, then welfare programs would be decreasing after helping people, instead of increasing by fostering more incentives for non-production and the creation of a…
- Hey - Welcome to DDO! Good luck :) -- -- -- Ill begin by assuming that this debate is focused around the United States. As such, it's fair to say that we live in a capitalistic society. When we do something that works, we are rewarded with money and subsequently continue doing…
- 1929.
Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. should become U.S. states
For
- Again, thank you for a great debate, and great arguments :). There is a good chance of you winning, this I conceed and accept willingly :). I think I have made my case quite clear in the 4 rounds previously :). Yet, I will close with the following arguments for each proposd…
- First off thank you again for this debate Lexus :) and I am sorry it took so long to post my round 4 arguments. Ok, so let's look at what you posted :). I feel that Puerto Rico could be lifted out of poverty if we all pitch in. America could bond together under the spirit of…
Against
- As mentioned, I cannot do round 5 due to time constraints. Voters, give PRO conduct because I have to forfeit a round. However, I would like to mention that I am winning the debate because I have efficiently proved that at least one of the proposed states should not be added to…
- Thanks for this debate. I'm going to be busy in the following few days, so it might be possible that I have to forfeit the last round due to time constraints. If that does happen, I apologize in advance. ------"I feel that Puerto Rico could be lifted out of poverty if we all…
- 1930.
Monarchy is better than a republic
For
- First of all I would like to point out that my opponent is under the assumption that all Republics are Democracies, which time has told they are not, for example the Untied Soviet Socialist Republics and the Democratic Republic of North Korea which were harsh communist…
- This house believes that Monarchy's are a firmer, more stable social balance. Corruption is less likely in a monarch led nation as the Monarch has been brought up through their whole life to follow the values of which they need to lead. Also decisions are considerably quicker…
Against
- I shall forfeit my round as my opponent was unable to make a rebuttal or conclusion.
- I stated in Round 1 that when referring to Republics I was referring to democracies, my failure to address quasi-monarchy dictatorships lay with unclear questioning on the part of my opponent. My opponent refers to communist dictatorships such as the USSR and the DPRK but fails…
- 1931.
Argentina benefits more from a US alliance than a Brazilian one
For
- I must forfeit this round. Joepbr may extend the BOP waiting time at my consent.
- Welcome Friends of DDO! I'll be challenging political science student, Joepbr, all the way from Brazil. The topic we will be arguing, is that Argentina's MNNA alliance with the US, is more beneficial then a hypothetical alliance with Brazil. My opponent will argue that…
Against
- Unfortunately, Jifpop's account is still closed, so I ask the voters to ignore this debate.
- I was going to extend the BoP waiting time as requested by my opponent, but unfortunately, he was banned, and therefore probably won't be coming back in the last round. This is a shame, not only because this debate will be wasted, but especially because Jifpop09 seemed to be…
- 1932.
George W. Bush's presidency was harmful to the United States
For
- Ill focus on Bush and the Iraq war, first point being that Bush didn't have a legitimate reason to start a war to begin with. After the events of 9/11 Bush passed the Patriot Act (providing appropriate tools to interfere and obstruct terrorism act) on his own accord and with…
- I am arguing that George Bush Jr is a bad man. Con make the first move.
Against
- Forfeit, my points carry on.
- Thanks for the quick reply Pro. Most of Pro's proof lies on the Iraq war, which, in the last round I showed largely wasn't of George Bush's design. He was fed bad information, and most of the aggression and even the policy behind the Iraq war was a Rumsfeld/Cheney brainchild.…
- 1933.
The Affordable Care Act should be repealed
For
- The Affordable Care Act doesn't benefit small businesses because they are forcing them to insure their employees. Further, employers cannot afford to insure all their employees due to the high cost of health insurance. According to cnbc.com, the majority of these people…
- The Affordable Care Act does affect not only businesses with over 50 employees, but also businesses with less than 50 employees. Prior to this act, it has been identified that the cost of health care in United States has been increasing throughout the years. Furthermore, the…
Against
- Compared to the hundreds of other taxes that Americans pay, the Affordable Care Act is minuscule. Saying that we do not need something just because we haven"t needed it yet is just plain ignorant. The same people that are protesting the Affordable Care Act are going to be the…
- The Affordable Care Act will not only benefit many small businesses it will also even out the playing field for all. Despite "managements generosity", as you have put it, half of those that are uninsured are small business owners, employees and those that are dependent; the…
- 1934.
Patriotism and nationalism are good for society
For
- Well see, with taxes, there has to be a certain amount of patriotism or otherwise it might be more expensive to Collect taxes then that tax income itself. It's good you brought up the concept of obligation, because think about it, why Would you feel obligated to pay your taxes?…
- Sure, here's a breakdown of a) what prisoner's dilemma is, and b) how it applies. Imagine two prisoners being kept in separate cells, being interrogated by the police. At the moment, the police have what they need to put these two away on lesser charges, but they want evidence…
Against
- Sweet. That's cool, I understand now. Of course the prisoner's dilemma is a great concept to use. I have seen it before in Nash's equilibrium (Game Theory) which is a very interesting topic which does show how idealistic capitalism works.... I must say that you make an…
- I must admit the reason I started this debate was to understand why people love patriotism so much and think it's such a great thing. I now understand, but I must say the idea with schools may just be that people are giving not to the country but to the children....it may be a…
- 1935.
Women crossing the DMZ should discuss North Korean human rights
For
- Nvm
- I think this was just propaganda. Yuna0707's argument was copied from here:http://nkgovinexile.com...
Against
- It seems that signs of ideological conflict are visible again. A group of women activities, called WomenCrossDMZ (WCD), is expected to visit Pyeongyang in North Korea on May 19, hold symposiums there, and cross the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) into South Korea on May 24. The group…
- 1936.
Communism has done more harm than capitalism
For
- Firstly I would like to add, that you must know very very little about the history of famines in the soviet union, even famines in the communist world. Firstly i will ask you, have you ever heard of the Holodomor? (http://en.wikipedia.org...) it was a mass famine that is…
- Communism is the repression of the masses, the government control of all means of production. Communism has always brought famine, war and fear to the people it was initially made to guard. Communism as well as socialism are systems in which the people suffer and their freedoms…
Against
- I'll get right to it. Holodomor has nothing to do with Communism. With the information I took from your link, it killed in the area between 2.5 and 7.5 million people because a bad harvest of the U. S. S. R. 's farms, only 70% of the standard crop was successfully harvested.…
- First of all, I accept. I would like to point out that we are debating the TWO EXTREMES of economy, pure Capitalism and pure Communism, and I need to show how Communism is at least 30% (worse being less than 50%, far worse being less than 20%, but I'm gracious) as good as…
- 1937.
Voluntaryism is the correct political philosophy
For
- Last round I quoted CON and I said I agreed with the following statement "The child deserves positive liberty - a freedom to be raised up happily and enjoy greater freedom in later life..." given the prevalent definitions of the word deserve. I meant to only include this part,…
- I am embarrassed by my previous response because I confused positive and negative freedom. But, somehow the confusion didn't prevent me from making useful arguments so I will take pride in that. I said "I reject the idea of negative freedom as useful concept for determining…
Against
- As stated, I'll spend this round arguing against the economics of voluntarism. As such, I apologise but I must assume everyone's familiarity with S&D graphs. This basic supply and demand tells us that the equilibrium occurs when the price of a good is £12, and 7 goods are…
- I shall build my case quickly, and attempt to address my opponent as I go. Then, I'll address solely my opponent's economic argument next round. Firstly, my opponent accurately defines negative freedom. It describes - and not prescribes - an absence of restraint. No negative…
- 1938.
Libertarians have stronger principles than conservatives
For
- First Round acceptance Definitions: Principle - a fundamental, primary, or general law or truth from which others are derived [1] [1] http://dictionary.reference.com...
- I will begin by countering my opponents statements. "Initially this is the approach taken by the U.S. in it's founding as it was seen as preferable to any governmental power at all. This was a considerable failure. [1] This failure was attributed to a lack of governmental…
Against
- Fair enough, I accept, good luck.
- At this point I am really not sure what I am arguing anymore, to me I think I misinterpreted the context of the debate, I honestly thought we were debating... I am not even sure what I thought we were debating, sorry for ruining your debate! Yes I am concceeding. But thanks, we…
- 1939.
Congress should have term limits
For
- Well, clearly debating politics ain't my fuckin' speciality when it comes to this, so, forfeit round 3.
- While I understand the deal with the soverignty we live in as a nation, and the fact that in order to be re-elected, a congressman must still maintain the support he had in the first place, I feel as though there is a potential issue with allowing these congressmen to…
Against
- Don't sweet it, it's your first debate and I have a degree in poly sci.... You did well for your first debate.
- Pro argues that the people maintaining their sovereignty has one potential issue. "That issue being, after a while, new generations being born in, the congressmen will not have the ideals the newer generations will be starting to hold." Not only is this not a potential issue,…
- 1940.
Communism is a bad form of government
For
- Contention 1. In a communist society, people will be motivated to help others. "The impulse to share wealth and material amongst the community, to support all, leaving none behind, is one of the purest mankind can experience. It is not merely possible – it is a demonstration of…
- Communism is a terrible form of government. Rather than letting the ruled people make decisions, a ruler, who is often misinformed and cruel, does all. You cannot object to decisions by that ruler. Even a monarchy is better, such as what was in England, because there was a…
Against
- Arguments extended.
- ===Refutations=== "Rather than letting the ruled people make decisions, a ruler, who is often misinformed and cruel, does all. You cannot object to decisions by that ruler. Even a monarchy is better, such as what was in England, because there was a parliament, where SOME of the…
- 1941.
We do not hold our politicians to the same moral standards as children
For
- Thank you Con for the response. I would like to remind Con that he is refuting the arguments made that "We do not hold our politicians to the same moral standards as children"Con concedes that politicians do immoral things but points out immoral acts such as adultery. I would…
- I'll remind my opponent that I have the BOP to prove the following resolution "We do not hold our politicians to the same moral standards as children". If con wishes to bring up other topics they may although it might be irrelevant to the topic. To start lets define moral. [1]…
Against
- 1. "I would hardly think that adultery is a moral wrong doing we forbid children to do. This is because children are not generally committing these acts. Bringing up adultery is an irrelevant point made by Con."No, parents do not teach young children this moral - but they do…
- My argument is this: politicians do break laws and commit immoral acts behind America's back. Everybody knows this - political and sex scandals do flood the history of American government. I am not denying that politicians are liars and cheaters or whatever. What I want to get…
- 1942.
The US government should pay reparations to African Americans
For
- It seems my opponent has no further argument
- I argue that the only issue with reparations for African-Americans is that the government would need to fix the budget to mitigate the high payout for African-American reparations. In addition, the distribution of "who gets money" would be another issue, other than that I see…
Against
- I would like to begin by pointing out something. The legal definition of "african american" is a person of african descent who is currently an american citizen. Because my opponent failed to provide their own definition, they automatically accept my definition. To defend my…
- I negate the resolved. I have three contentions supporting this. First, I will define key terms. Legal-Dictionary.com defines reparations as "compensation for injury" and uslegal.com defines African American as "citizens of the United States who have origins in Africa". 1. My…
- 1943.
LGBT people should have full civil rights
For
- "The purpose of civil law is to restore someone as far as is possible to the position that they were in prior to their legal rights being breached" - No, this is false. The purpose of Western law especially in the United States of America is to uphold individuals natural…
- I believe those that identify as LGBT should be given the same civil rights as non LGBT people. You present your argument first.
Against
- Your statement- "Yes, but their NATURAL rights. Not civil rights. Civil rights are things such as your right to a lawyer, which in the absence of a state is meaningless." Sorry guy, can't make up your own things. Right to lawyer, is Miranda! What are the Miranda Rights? In…
- The purpose of civil law is to restore someone as far as is possible to the position that they were in prior to their legal rights being breached. In other words it's to settle disputes and help the person who feels their rights were breached to be able to go back to their…
- 1944.
Any state should be allowed to secede
For
- I believe that secession should be allowed. First round acceptance and state your position DO NOT ARGUE YET. Please give a witty quote to go with the argument "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."
Against
- Well this was a waste of time.
- It appears my opponent has yet to argue again. I will wait.
- 1945.
Western nations should recognize Crimea as Russian territory
For
- Thank you for the articulate response. I will address Con's arguments and then cross-apply my own. Responses: Argument A: My opponent points to international law as a guiding principle for the modification of borders between sovereign states. I believe that international law…
- To truly understand the important role that Crimea plays in Russian politics and development, one must look to the historical context. Crimea was initially colonized by the Russian Empire in 1783. Russia developed Crimea into an important strategic asset with the growth of…
Against
- Thanks, BraxtonC. In this round I will rebut your constructive case and I will defend & strengthen my own in the following round. Rebuttals 1. Demographics My opponent states that Crimea should be recognized as Russian territory because of its mostly Russian population. I find…
- I will now do the same and I will provide rebuttals to his arguments in Round 3. There are several reasons why the West should not recognize Crimea as under Russian sovereignty. Argument A: All territory or border alterations between two sovereign countries should be decided…
- 1946.
The United States should abolish the Electoral College
For
- I believe that the Electoral college should be replaced with the popular vote instead. First off, there is uneven voting power based on where you live. According to FairVote.org, each individual vote in Wyoming counts nearly four times as much in the Electoral College as each…
- 1-acceptance 2-reasoning 3-rebute opponents reasoning 4-defend from rebuttal 5-conclusion Pretty please with a cherry on top no ff's
Against
- "Where'd You Go?" Where'd you go? I miss you so, Seems like it's been forever, That you've been gone. She said "Some days I feel like s*, Some days I wanna quit, and just be normal for a bit," I don't understand why you have to always be gone, I get along but the trips always…
- PM me if you can debate next round. Anyway, if not, Vote for Me!!!yeah!!!!
- 1947.
No government can be perfect
For
- The root of a bad government is the inability to create a stable society that consistently keeps the good of the people in mind, while respecting the rest of the world. There are many things that can interrupt this process of decision making. For practical purposes, I will name…
- Thank you for catching this misunderstanding. There is no perfect form of government if you use the literal form of the word, shown by such distopian texts such as "The Giver" and "Brave New World", texts where a group attempts to make a perfect government, but only succeeds in…
Against
- It's not the best of arguments, but I would have to say that - as with defining perfectness, most of the 'problems' mentioned are relative or at least highly personal. For example, I consider American society to be very stable, with comparativly little widespread conflicts,…
- Forfeid.
- 1948.
The US should pay reparations to African Americans
For
- Just as I predicted my opponent has very little knowledge of the history of Black Americans. I don't need a history lesson on the Civil War or Slavery. If my opponent seriously believes that African Americans owe a debt to this country because this country decided to stop…
- I am for reparations for Black Americans and for other minority groups more broadly but would like to debate the merits for reparations for Black Americans specifically . I have heard and read many arguments against reparations for Black Americans and have found all arguments…
Against
- I was really hoping to hear the logic of why some think there should be reparations for Black Americans. Since PRO has forfeited this debate I am hoping to see a similar topic debated in the future.
- I was really hoping to hear the logic of why some think there should be reparations for Black Americans. Since PRO has forfrighted this debate I am hoping to see a similar topic debated in the future.
- 1949.
Countries should build physical barriers on their borders
For
- Illegal immigration is unfair to legal immigrants.
- "Good fences make good neighbors"
Against
- Illegal immigrants will simply go around a 700 mile fence
- Greater border efforts actually incentivizes more organized crime:
- 1950.
Australia should accept more Syrian refugees
For
- Scared him off I guess ;)
- Extend all arguments
Against
- I don't believe Australia needs to do its fair share in accepting Syrian refugees.
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?