Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 37
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1801.
India will become the next world superpower
For
- Turns out Con had his account closed -_____-
- I fear the Con may have started this debate and then not come back online....
Against
- I take the side that India will not be the next world power,due to increasing population lack of resources, and lack of respect from the rest of the world.
- 1802.
Assault rifles should be legal for civilians
For
- Rebuttals: 1. I think your misreading the plain text of the second amendment. It clearly states the right of the people, not the right of the militia, to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Yes the founders write like Yoda, so in laymen's terms it means the right of the…
- Challenge Accepted! First I would like to thank you for the debate. It appears that this will be a free-form debate as you didn't give any guidelines. I will use this first round to define terms and make my argument. Definitions: Constitution in this debate will refer to the…
Against
- Definitions: Militia: A body of citizens enrolled for military service, and called out periodically for drill, but serving full time only in emergencies.http://dictionary.reference.com...Amendment: in government and law, an addition or alteration made to a constitution,…
- Who needs an assult rifle? Guns are a great thing, but they are also causing many unwanted and tragic deaths in the world. In aurora CO., the attacker used assult rifles to kill and injure dozens. Imagine if he only had a pistol or hunting rifle, much less damege would have…
- 1803.
The NAACP helps African Americans more than it hinders them
For
- Thank you for your kind words, Con. I wish you all the best, and hope we'll have the opportunity to debate again soon. As for this debate, I did meet my burden of proof by demonstrating that the NAACP has (even if it was in the past) played an important and helpful role for…
- Thank you, Con. I'll take a moment to acknowledge what I consider to be your sincere desire to bridge the racial divide, and alleviate fear, suffering, and isolation for people of all races – a desire which both I and the NAACP share, irrespective of whether we all agree upon…
Against
- I will make this round quick. I first want to again tell the Pro that I brought up that race must not be used as a factor in deciding items or choices because it will teach children that race does not change your life, for better or worse. That is why I brought up that point.…
- We ought to take the default position that, as they claim to, the NAACP is concerned with fighting for social justice for all Americans" says my opposition. Yes the NAACP tells us that, however when looking at crimes that are black on white, like the beatings at Church and…
- 1804.
The Electoral College should be replaced by direct presidential elections
For
- I will be arguing that the Electoral College system in the United States should be abolished in favor of direct election. DefinitionsDirect election: a national popular vote that is won by getting a majority of votes, or a plurality that surpasses 40%. EC: Electoral CollegeGE:…
- Please stop trying your argument by verbosity, it's obnoxious.The negative's argument is essentially that a popular election might be contested for so long that it would somehow go past January 20th.The first example used is the hanging chad recount fiasco. This example,…
Against
- Here's the deal, I tend to agree with the notion of an electoral college in principal and in what it means in regard to a nation which holds democratic elections. The concept of states votes being lumped into a point system, taking the majority of plurality, and then that being…
- The electoral college, is, as my "opponent" said, contradictory to the fundamental tenets of democracy, and while I agree here, I am dubious of if the electoral college is a necessity to hold democratic elections. Allow me to elaborate, with some historical evidence that is.…
- 1805.
Liberals have contributed more to America than conservatives
For
- It was implied that we were talking about governmental policies, so if you would still like to continue on this subject, please stay in the debate. Liberal government has given you many things, like an end to slavery, civil rights, public education, clean air, clean water,…
- Liberal does not necessarily equal Democrat, nor does conservative necessarily Republican.
Against
- word
- If it was implied then I apologize for being too dumb to know that. I thought economic contributions matter to America but I could be mistaken. Now let's get to the nitty gritty stuff Pro has displayed to us: He argues that the "Liberal" government ended slavery... The party…
- 1806.
Right-wing libertarianism is preferable to left-wing ideology
For
- In my view in Britain I live in a fair and just Right Wing and Capitalist country. Because the main argument against Capitalism is that it can't be a meritocracy because of inheritance. But I belief individuals have the right to pass on their wealth to who they wish when they…
- In a right wing society every individual has the freedom and opportunity to become a member of this 'elite' you talk about by working hard and earning what they deserve. In a left wing society the government forcefully takes the money of those doing well and gives it to those…
Against
- Rebuttals. Firstly I would like to say that I am not altogether opposed to a society that works off the definition of capitalism, though it would need responsible government that was poerful enough to conduct it properly. This is the misunderstanding I think between people of…
- I am going to argue to the contrary. I believe that policies that lean towards the common-good are far more moral than policies that maintain elitism. I will even argue that a society built around the common-good, with emphasis on community values and freedom of expression,…
- 1807.
The Philippines should be governed by a single ruler
For
- Hitler proposes to conquer other countries, hence, creating superhumans, hence, killing millions of people (eliminating weak people). It doesnt need to be a leader that kills, we need a leader that leads. Although, i dont care about the killings, as long as they kill the…
- Con can now proceed
Against
- A: "It doesn't need to be a leader that kills, we need a leader that leads. Although, I don't care about the killings, as long as they kill the squatters, rapists, murderers and any person that doesn't obey the rules. I mean would you protect this people?" 1. In a dictatorship…
- Extend all arguments
- 1808.
The US should lift sanctions against Cuba
For
- Sanctions are not working
- Foreign policy should follow the will of the people
Against
- Cuba deserves sanctions
- Sanctions are necessary for national security
- 1809.
Military conscription is justified
For
- Yeah Yeah Yeah
- Come on, this guy started the debate.
Against
- I negate. Resolved: "Military conscription is justified" I will offer some definitions: Rights: that which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, moral principles Military conscription: compulsory enrollment of persons for military or naval service Justified: to show…
- 1810.
Foreign aid to the Middle East should be cut
For
- There seem to be two major issues of conflict in this round. First, that this plan will harm the people of the middle east. Second, that I use too much evidence. As far as harming the people in the middle east, I think my opponent's argument stems from a misunderstanding that I…
- Again, my opponent is basing her arguments on unfounded and unsupported claims. Now she wants you to believe that without our financial support, ISIS will completely take over the region, destroying our trade goods. If you know much about the region you will be pretty sure that…
Against
- The entire basis of your argument this whole time has been to COMPLETELY cut off foreign aid to the Middle East. Now you are saying that humanitarian aid will continue. What I don't think you understand is that all of that money has to go through the government to reach the…
- You seem to be dancing around my argument. There is an abundance is of information on how important our aid is to citizens. One thing that you don't understand is that part of the world is mostly in poverty. Also, Saudi Arabia isn't the only country in the Middle East. There…
- 1811.
Rand Paul should be the next US president
For
- I hope someone out there is willing to actually debate this topic with me. It's frustrating that I put all the time into making these arguments for nothing.
- It appears that my opponent is one of those people that makes an account, accepts a debate, then never comes back to the site again. This is what I feared would happen once I opened up the debate for anyone to accept. How disappointing.
Against
- Hello, I shall be debating in favor of Senator Bernie Sanders of the Democratic Party.
- 1812.
Poverty is Africa's most important security issue
For
- Poor states have trouble providing security
- Poverty means more crime
Against
- Identity issues are very difficult to solve
- Ethno-religious divides are a bigger security threat
- 1813.
Assault weapons should not be banned
For
- Whether it's the 18th century or not is irrelevant. The founding fathers made the constitution so that it would always apply, even today. What's important here is the detail of the tyranny. Besides, what you say about me being unmatched to the military is untrue, it's a strange…
- No offense to you, but you're a classic example of someone who doesn't know what the second amendment is actually for. You see, the founding fathers didn't even trust themselves, and wanted you and me to be equally armed to them in the case that they became tyrannical and tried…
Against
- I think 200+ years are very relevant in the changing of history, by that argument it's okay to own slaves. The founding fathers made the consitution so it could be changed or amended as the times changed. Are you suggesting the miltary is going to turn on the government? I…
- Times have changed since the 18th century. And you seriously think all civilians with guns would be a match for the United States military. How about the police shootings in Texas, it's Texas so somebody their had a gun, yet the officers(who also had guns) still were killed. By…
- 1814.
Economic sanctions should not be used to achieve foreign policy goals
For
- I am so so so sorry. I had a travel tournament this weekend and I completely forgot about this. Please give me the loss here.
- The affirmative's advocacy is that the United States Federal Government ought not use economic sanctions against Iran to achieve its foreign policy objectives. Parametricizing is legitimate because 1) The consequence that results from the use of sanctions varies from scenario…
Against
- Um... Maybe we can finish this next round?
- PROGRESSIVE!!!! YES! -- I negate I value Morality. Morality is implicit in the resolution since it is the only way to evaluate the topic, as it is a question of moral obligation. Morality is the framework for decision making of an individual as well as society. The logical…
- 1815.
The US federal government should continue funding the military
For
- Round 1-Acceptance, Round 2-Cases, Round 3-Rebuttals, Round 4-Defense I will be defending the government's decision to fund the Military with between 600 and 800 billion dollars. I believe that our military should be our first priority, while Con tries to prove the exact…
- Conduct to Con. Defense: Contention 1: US Debt: "Today the US debt is climbing to astronomical numbers. It is $19 trillion and climbing. This disaterous spending causes US inflation, and on top of the US debt this will cause a catastrophe for the US and nations all across the…
Against
- I thank everyone for their patience as it is now time for this debate to come to a close. Contention 1: Debt My opponent brings up that since both countries owe each other then it would cancel out and wouldn't be a big deal. This isn't true as that would only work under public…
- All points extended.
- 1816.
The United States should recognize the Federal State of Novorossiya
For
- You also, I enjoyed our debate a great deal, and I learned a lot.
- My friend has clearly given some convincing arguments, and I thank him for debating this with me once again. My arguments for this round are simple, yet clear. My opponent says that the Ukraine rebels-aka The Federal State of Novorossiya was to blame for MH417 being shot down.…
Against
- I have really enjoyed this debate against my friend. I would really love to debate against him again. I have stated many reasons why I do not support Novorossiya. I hope you take my arguments into consideration. Have a nice day.
- It has been a wonderful debate so far. I would like to point out a few things in my opponents round 3 argument that is simply not true or possible at this point in time. 1)My opponent stated in his argument that ,"The Ukraine would preserve its national dignity as a nation. ",…
- 1817.
Iran is not developing nuclear weapons
For
- Iran has come under the spotlight of suspicion for its developing of a nuclear program. Iran claims it to be solely for peaceful purposes while a majority of other nations allege it to be for a weapons program. I am arguing in favor of the resolution as I believe that the…
- You stay classy, San Diego.
Against
- I accept. :)
- My apologies, Nic. I broke my leg while skiing, but would look forward to debating this topic with you. Especially given that I have a bit of time on my hands now! :)
- 1818.
Freedom will become a luxury in the future
For
- I see where you are coming from. Firstly your example of the US doesn't relate to the notations introduced in 1984 such as doublethink nor do they relate to North Korea. I didn't choose the topic, my friend did, and so, am trying to 'debate' with another debater about it. I…
- In accordance with George Orwell's 1984 and the world's current totalitarian state, North Korea, freedom will indeed be a luxury. Freedom to act on one's will, freedom of expression and freedom to privacy is destroyed in both totalitarian regimes; given that they both conduct…
Against
- I apologize for not quite following what point you were trying to prove. In North Korea, the people are brainwashed to worship their leader as a god, and in 1984, Winston was really the only person believing in himself, and due to the fact of numbers, he eventually gave in to…
- The megalomaniacal power grabs of the state are a sign of them losing control. Suggesting freedom can be a luxury is suggesting that people don't own themselves. Every single form of government relies on the consent of the governed, for there is no higher authority in your life…
- 1819.
Politicians' salaries should equal the national per capita income
For
- Limitation : Developing Country Im totally agree with the motion because, 1. Dedrease the amount of money that country ue for politician's salary 2. The amount of money should be transfered to build the economy in its country and increse the prosperity of people 3. Politicians…
Against
- Extend my arguments.
- Extend my arguments.
- 1820.
Failed states pose a greater threat to the US than stable nations
For
- What do you do when your opponent forfeits? :(
- I would like to begin by refuting my opponent's case, then move on to rebuild my own. I will begin by attacking my opponent's defintions. Firstly, my opponent stated that the definition of a failed state is one in which is in a state of anarchy or is on the verge of falling…
Against
- First off I would like to thank you for responding so qiuckley neurologie I will begin by changing my definition of failed state in order to simplify and better express it a failed state is one that is in a state of anarchy or near anarchy or must receive massive foreign…
- Resolved: failed states pose a greater threat to the United States than stable nations First let us define the terms failed states: a state that is unable to maintain it's territorial sovereignty or that is torn by civil strife and is unable to sufficiently administer it's…
- 1821.
America should help the poor and needy
For
- Sorry that I didn't clarify. What I meant is that America should help the poor in America, through social programs by the U. S Government. -the ITdude
- If you accept the challenge, you are against. You have 72 hours to respond. the max amount of charcters are 10,000 and their are 5 rounds. May the best man win!-theITdude
Against
- Pro has forfeited last round. Pro failed to provide refutations. Nice debate, Cinnamon
- Pro forfeits another round.
- 1822.
The United States should ban assault weapons
For
- Banning assault weapons increases liberty and security
- A ban would save lives
Against
- Assault weapons are not used in most crimes
- An assault weapons ban would violate the second amendment
- 1823.
Primary debates should include candidates from both parties
For
- We've seen 2 debates featuring all the candidates of the GOP (4 if you count the happy hour debates) and most recently we saw the 1st debate featuring all the Democratic candidates, but we have not nor will not see any debates featuring candidates from BOTH parties until well…
- 1) Factual accuracy in debates "Even if something happens and is regularly acknowledged does not mean that it is allowed. "Except in this case it is allowed. .. . There are not fact-checkers on the stage to validify every claim that a candidate makes in a debate, meaning that…
Against
- I will enjoy this delightful debate subject. Yes, while candidates need to have insight on what their stance is on other 'real' candidates as you mentioned, the two parties are associated as such; democratic party to liberalism(usually) and republican to conservative(usually).…
- First of all, I would like to point out that you attacked the only point I gave without any support... I mean, whatever floats your boat. Presidential debates between candidates from both parties AFTER the sides nominate a candidate are remarkably different from average debates…
- 1824.
Foreign broadcasters offer more accurate news than domestic outlets
For
- Thank you for proving MY point. You will just keep on saying they aren't biased and I'm proving your point. You proved my point by saying I proved yours when I said nothing. You, my friend, are full of crap. You obviously have shown no knowledge of any bias in medias. I will…
- You cannot prove that the networks are unbiased. I can prove they are. To destroy your upcoming 3rd round argument, I'll prove they are biased in the 4th round. I want to see what you'll say in this round, seeing as how you now have no argument except to tell me, "How are they…
Against
- Uhhh no you these people dont "hate you" you just make stupid arguments about stupid things. Let me break this down for you. 1. You have no evidence throughout the debate on how BBC or Foreign news channels are even better... Flow that to the negative. 2. I agree that news…
- Well first off that is my argument all news sites and channels are all biased in some way... Which does not make Foreign Word News Channels better. You proved me right everyone will now vote negative because you cant prove that they arnt biased cause i know they are.
- 1825.
No government can ever be 100% flawless
For
- I guess my opponent gives up? :(
- R1: "It could be a perfect species or an all powerful being that made the robots."There is no proof of either."In fact, I can bring up the statement that I am part of a perfect god like species and I rule myself, and my opponent will not be able to disprove that."Perhaps you…
Against
- R.1 Robots do not have to be man made"Robot programming =/= perfection. Even robot logic can be errant."What? I believe my opponent is implying since humans are flawed and since robots are flawed therefore robots are flawed as well? Who said the government had to be human? It…
- C.1 Government does not have be made by people therefore, it does not have to be flawedMy opponent defined government as "the governing body of a state, nation, or community." My idea of artificial intelligence of governing is not a contradiction to the definition, therefore…
- 1826.
The US should fund rebel groups to defeat ISIS
For
- The question is not whether these attempts have provided positive feed back over the years, there are two questions that need to be asked. The first question is whether supporting rebels is successful, and secondly is whether or not this will bring peace to the middle east. Let…
- I believe it is within the best interest of the United States of America to fund and support rebels in the fight against ISIS. When you look at the modern geopolitical map of the world we are seeing a loss in the USA's power grip on the world. ISIS is a threat that must not be…
Against
- I affirm that the United States should not fund rebels to defeat ISIS because: A. Funding rebels has never worked according to history Funding rebels hasn"t worked out before if you are familiar with U.S. History. In Vietnam, there was a Vietnamization policy where the United…
- I hope to have an interesting discussion with my opponent.
- 1827.
The United States should keep troops in Iraq
For
- Although this may be true from a civilian standpoint, I would much rather control or have the opportunity to control the violence, as opposed to having a Dictator that was killing people in mass amounts. An unpredictable, ruthless, killer who just simply dominated the country.…
- I was initially a Bush supporter, as most, untill the administration handled its foreign policy terribly wrong. I say presence as in a constant military presence. An embassy is necesary and is already established. Obviously without a constant military presence the Kurdish,…
Against
- Democracy in Iraq will never stay because the people are just having it forced on them now. In America, democracy was decided as our political status by us, not another country 10000+ miles away which had nothing to do with us until they invaded. You cannot argue that democracy…
- It didn't prove negative on other countries until WE invaded. Iraq is just a farther away Cuba. It's been proven mutliple times that the religious terrorism groups had nothing to do with attacking us.
- 1828.
Eritrea is responsible for its isolation
For
- Human Rights Abuse
- Eritrea started the 1998 war
Against
- The UN has done little to facilitate improvement
- The US has unfairly supported Ethiopia
- 1829.
The United States is the best nation in the world
For
- I accept
Against
- Well, that was a short debate...
- Was does it mean to be the best nation? What qualifications must a country have in order to fit under this category? A nation that is dubbed the 'best nation' means that other nations look up to that nation and want to be just like them. When ever I hear the words 'America' and…
- 1830.
The United States should have funded the F-22 instead of the F-35
For
- A brief summary of both aircraft: F-22A Raptor: The F-22A Raptor is the aircraft selected for the Advanced Tactical Fighter competition to replace F-15 Eagle air superiority fighters. The F-22 makes use of low-reflection angles, radar-absorbent coatings, low infrared signature…
- Simple, educated military debate. Resolved: The US military should have pursued further into the F-22A Raptor rather than the F-35A/B/C Lightning II Round one is acceptance only, round two for arguments, rounds 3-4 for rebuttals, and round 4 is conclusions
Against
- I will be representing the argument that the US should not invest in either the F-22 Raptor or the F-35 Series planes. I reject all round structure rules, because I am a real debater, and that isn't how debating in the real world works. Live with it,
- 1831.
News media outlets should be subsidized by governments
For
- So much so that I kiwi believe it, are you lemon me believe this? I think I've exhausted all my fruit puns now… I do apologise if my method of debate structuring is not appl-easing to you (ooh, there was one left! ). Rebuttal XII: "Giving their competitors money to keep them…
- I'm now back in the UK (umm… huzzah? ) so he can feel free to respond at his own leisure. Though, since we're both somewhat lazy teenagers, anyone religiously watching this debate probably won't notice any change in pace. I'd like to thank my opponent for his streamlined…
Against
- I'm a bit melon-choly for the end of this debate round. My opponent and I do make a great pear. So I thank him cherry much for his participationNow, onto his arguments. I've hand-picked the best of my rebuttals for these points that are just peachy, so let's waste no more time!…
- I am grapeful to CitrusHavoc (or something or other) for his response. I agree that typically I would be lazy about responding, but with the week I have ahead, I'll have to force myself to actually be productive ahead of a deadline (Is that . .. even. .. . legal? )Kiwi go…
- 1832.
The United States should complete construction of the border fence
For
- I accept. Some definitions: current - now, border fence - separation barrier wall or fence constructed to limit the movement of people across a certain line or border. I agree that we will base this on the Wiki article. Good luck.
Against
- Its safe to say con won.
- Extend
- 1833.
Voting in presidential elections is a waste of time
For
- I believe presidential voting is pointless and a waste of time. I also believe the election process is only there to give citizens the illusion they have control over their government.
Against
- Pikachi!
- It's nice of the princess to invite us over for a picnic, eh Luigi? I hope she made losta spaghetti! Luigi, look! It's from Bowser! (I hope you get the reference!) Vote Con, people! Pro abandoned the debate (and probably Debate.org in general)!
- 1834.
Russia is a better country to live in than India
For
- Well, Russia has a better culture than India. Russia, although generally a second-world nation, is still better than India. Russian food is better, and it has great desserts and ice cream. India, on the other hand, is stinky and an overpopulated third world nation. Please,…
- so? communism is better for the world, because it gets rid of the rich folks
Against
- We have over 400 living languages, and we have Sanskrit, considered the mother of all languages. We have created 4 religions, buddhism, jainism, sikhism, and hinduism. The Harappan civilization, in 3000 BCE we created sewer systems. We invented the zero. We have a variety of…
- So, what is wrong with these "Rich Folks"? If they have not done bad things, evading taxes, being greedy, committing crimes, etc., what is wrong with them? Also your argument is wrong because Russia is no longer communist. It is technically a "Federal semi-presidential…
- 1835.
Politicians should match each campaign dollar with charitable donations
For
- Informed? Many studies have been conducted where impulse voting, voting based on party alone, and name recognition based on propaganda alone were primary triggers. Aside, 38% of the voters in the last presidential election did not attend high school, when you add in those who…
- Your welcome, yet my argument awaits a rebuttal.
Against
- "Informed? Many studies have been conducted where impulse voting, voting based on party alone, and name recognition based on propaganda alone were primary triggers. Aside, 38% of the voters in the last presidential election did not attend high school, when you add in those who…
- Alright, i figured that was just an opening statement. As we all know, the max amount of money a person can give to a candidate as of right now is $5,200. While I understand that there are good things that can be done with $5,200, where do you plan on getting the money from?…
- 1836.
Successful left-wing models of governance exist
For
- If you look at facts places like Sweden and the other nordics are good places to do business, Good places for innovation, Very egalitarian and score very high even in conservative index of individual freedom, As does uraguay great place for business that cares also for its…
- I did not say socialist policies are now more successful i said the left or progressive, All systems are and have always a combination of socialist and capitalist state and private, All systems are that way, To claim that in order to claim victory we have to make some old…
Against
- Countries who accepted the morality of the left means success for you, Is alright - no arguments there. Since when looking at morality - it's only relative: If you believing gay marriage is good then you think it is a success, But if I say "I don't believe in gay marriage" then…
- 1837.
Voting should be compulsory
For
- Thank you for your response. My opponent has answered neither of my arguments in favour of compulsory voting. All she has done is answered *some* of my rebuttals to her arguments. 'It is proven that this does not work and many randomly select a candidate' Huh? My opponent says…
- Thank you for your response. First, I'd like to clear up a very, very stupid mistake I made in my last round- namely that people have no choice in the right to be innocent until proven guilty. Obviously, they can plea guilty. Note, however, that my opponent did not point this…
Against
- I thank my oponent for his quick response! A few rebuttles first: 'by putting a 'no suitable candidate' box at the top' It is proven that this does not work and many randomly select a cadidate ie - the first cadidate on the ballot therefore it is unfair and is not very…
- Thank you for your response! Sorry about the confussion - i put it under politics but did not specify in the debate title! =/ Adding to my argument there is now the 'donkey vote' especially in Australia where voting is compulsary. It is done by normally voting the first few…
- 1838.
Turkey should be allowed to join the European Union
For
- Turkey is a poverty stricken country and entry into the EU would help to raise the living standards for its entire population
- Any country that fulfils the accession criteria should be allowed to join
Against
- Turkey would have the largest population of all member states and would therefore hold a disproportionate amount of voting power
- The geographical definition of Europe must be limited and does not include Turkey
- 1839.
The UK voting age should be lowered to 16
For
- In my opinion it depends what school a teacher is at- if they are at a ordinary secondary school then, I agree, most teachers would be left wing party supporters. But if the teacher is at a private school then, due to a more upper class view on life, they would most likely be a…
- But without school teachers a pupil cannot gain information about the left wing parties, what is good/bad about them etc. Or if they were going to vote other than left wing they would gain knowledge of the left wings bad points. I do not agree with your statement that if…
Against
- I agree on the OAPs being problem in regard to questions of pension budgets and that is something that concerns me, however to the question of 16 year olds and voting; school really is a propaganda factory for left wing parties, I remember one of my teachers at school running…
- 18 gives youngsters more time to gain experience of the world outside of school which is important. School is biased towards Socialist/left wing policies and the effect of this on your rationality at age 16 is important. When people enter the working world they became more…
- 1840.
Sanctions should be used to promote democracy
For
- Sanctions make clear where a country stands.
- Sanctions have been an effective long term policy tool in the past.
Against
- Sanctions are the opposite of free trade and therefore should not be used because free trade has greater benefits.
- Sanctions are ineffective because it is very difficult to unify an adequate number of countries to cripple an economy.
- 1841.
European constitutional monarchies ought to be dissolved
For
- ROUND 1This debate will be about the constitutional monarchies of Europe and whether or not this form of government should be accepted. The premise of this debate is the Constitutional Monarchies of Europe ought to be dissolved. I will take the Pro side of the premise, while my…
- ROUND 3 I would first off like to apologise for the delay for my response. Procrastination for my Biology lab resulted in procrastination for this debate. I am stuck in the everlasting circle of procrastination. Oh well. Anyways, let us return to the debate!ECONOMIC BENIFITS OF…
Against
- Round 3RebuttalsI would like to start off by mentioning the journalist my opponent quoted. Hamilton Nolan can also be quoted as saying this about the monarchy, (it should be noted that he is talking about all members of the monarchy here, including the elderly Queen and the…
- Round 2I, too, would like to show my appreciation to my opponent for challenging me to this debate - it is greatly... appreciated. I'm sure we can fit some fun into what I hope shall be an eye-opening and interesting debate.Economic benefits of the MonarchyIt is integral to my…
- 1842.
Anarchy would not work as a political system
For
- �I will now continue my claim that anarchy would not work. �Reasoning: 1) In order for Anarchy to work, the entire world would have to be Anarchists. Let's say if the United States was an Anarchy, other world powers would think of it as free land. Afterall, we wouldn't have…
- Hello, I am debating that Anarchy will not work.Rules:Round 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Present ReasoningRound 3: Defend Reasoning/Present new reasoningRound4 : Final Remarks
Against
- Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited yet again.
- Extend arguments and refutations.
- 1843.
Communism is the best solution to most of the world's problems
For
- Through out this debate I will be covering many issues that communism can solve. For the first two rounds I will focus on the social issues that communism can solve. "Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution. " Karl Marx in his book,…
- I would like to apologize to Con for my computer issues, if you voters did not see my comment, I had difficult posting my round 3 arguments due to some script error my computer was giving me when I was hitting the submit button, so I was forced to forfeit the round. I will…
Against
- Thank you for your opening argument, Pro. Karl Marx was a brilliant and persuasive thinker, but did not get to see his ideas empirically tested. If he had, then in order to maintain intellectual honesty he would have had to admit that he was mistaken about many things. I begin…
- I'd like to start by welcoming my opponent to DDO, as I see he is a new member. This debate is in response to the opinion question posed by Guardian_Rock: . http://www.debate.org...My opponent seems to strongly favor Communism. I'd like to give him an opportunity to elaborate…
- 1844.
The EPA should merge with the Department of Energy
For
- Its obviouthat my oppnent stands shoulder-shoulder wth the GOP/TEA PARTY ideaology, because he supports not consolidating the EPA with the Department of energy. Aside from that point, I will say that many states have file llawsuists against the EPA because of failure Gov't…
- In recent years studies after studies have showed how poorly the EPA is handled and ran. Many members of Congress and Candidated have proposed eliminating the EPA altogether. Instead I have a better idea, the President, (via Excutive Order) should instruct the Department of…
Against
- It's obvious that my opponent(with his numerous typographical errors) didn't take time to proofread his arguments. Rebuttal: Air quality standards review-The fact that the EPA doesn't rely on actual scientists is exactly why we need to get rid of it. For example, the EPA…
- This is the exact same argument that you posted previously. I have refuted parts of your argument and you haven't addressed them. For example, did you debunk my evidence from CERN?
- 1845.
The US government should guarantee health insurance for all residents
For
- but the fact nis that some people might not want to pay but they should be allowed not gurantees but as the toop0d i forfrit gurl this stuff 15 Cr@zy 3m y D!5 man wus fu55ing ova sum cheese 1N A DEBATE
- yes the us government should because half of the us soldiers do not have insurance for when they come home with injuries and they are not covered they should have it because it is not right at all all residents should have health care because everyone gets sick and they can't…
Against
- Well, if they care about their health then they would pay for their healthcare. and Can the United States afford to? Universal health care is what is called an entitlement, like Social Security or Medicare. If we have the government start providing our health care be prepared…
- ∙We already have health care for all residents. It's just that some residents don't want to pay for their own care. The government shouldn't pay for everyone's care, everyone should take responsibility for themselves. If the government is going to use my tax money to pay for…
- 1846.
Social democracy is superior to minarchism
For
- Is American Healthcare really that high Quality? Short Answer: No. I recently read a New York Times article on the State of American Healthcare, And it was embarrassing to say the least. Essentially if you aren't well-off then you won't get the same standard of Care as your…
- I'd like to open with a Definition; The Definition of a Nation. "A people who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language; a nationality" - American Heritage Dictionary. A Nation is a family, A really big family where everyone is expected to do their part as…
Against
- Well, healthcare arguments aside, as they have been given maybe a little too much attention throughout this debate, I do have a few final points I would like to make. I stand by my arguments, and by my standing on these issues. I think that humans have the ability to reach…
- Let me use America as an example for the non-socialized system. It is shown through observations and newspaper articles and surveys and polls and numbers of other sources of the type of hell that can go down in a hospital waiting room financed by socialized benefits. Crowded…
- 1847.
Not all countries should adopt modern democracy
For
- Many people say that all countries should be a democratic country and if a country is not democratic then the majority call for an intervention of sorts in order to bring in democracy. I personally believe that the majority of a population are not smart enough to vote in a…
- Now to clarify, i do believe that some nations are fit to adopt modern day democracy hence my title being that not all countries must adopt to modern day democracy but i still firmly believe that the majority are not. To also clarify by what i mean by intelligence. In my…
Against
- Pro FF'd so I'll keep it short. REDUCED CORRUPTION- Pro simply argued that democracies also have corruption. Pro failed to show that autocracies have a better track record on corruption than democracies. ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENTS- Pro argued that the economic growth of Western…
- I admit I'm still a little hazy on Pro's thesis here, although his post in the comments section has concretized his position somewhat.Pro argues that the majority of nations do not benefit by adopting democratic governments. So far, Pro has not defined a measurement by which we…
- 1848.
The UN budget should be frozen
For
- There has been a serious inequality in the funding of the UN budget.
- No-growth funding policy results in better operation of the finances and will improve financial discipline.
Against
- US inflexibility diminishes its leadership role in the world body.
- The current global problems constantly require more funding.
- 1849.
Voting rights should be extended to minors and non-citizens
For
- For the USA Specifically, Anyone who pays income tax, And any resident of at least 36 months, Should be eligible to vote in any government election. Citizenship should not be a requirement to participate in elections, And age restrictions don't make sense for voting.
- To clarify my position on minors: Anyone who can work, Should be allowed a vote. 16 year olds working at a fast food chain pay income taxes and sales, But do not have a say in government. This doesn"t seem fair. I would argue that if someone is old enough to work and pay their…
Against
- An argument for changing the current system of transition from resident to citizen might be made. But for 'guests to vote? No still I say. Might a person who has stayed in a land for 33 years consider it their land and country? Might feel they have skin in the game from 20…
- I'll bite. For age, There's a reason 'councils of elders can be seen numerous times in nations, Organizations, And in history. Education, Wisdom, Experience are usually qualities gained across years of 'adult life. I'm not saying kids are coddled and shielded from the harsher…
- 1850.
The Fairness Doctrine should be rejected
For
- Con states, "Pro might want to study some more history." I challenge Con to present the specific history that he thinks is relevant to the debate and to defend its relevance. What is he talking about? 1. Pro asserted that the Government has the right to regulate what it owns in…
- Definitions and History. Con asserted that my account of the Fairness Doctrine, mostly copied from Wikipedia, was "right wing." However, he did not cite any inaccuracy or offer any alternative definition or history. Therefore I assume he accepts it. I guess it is history he…
Against
- Pro has challenged me to present the specific history that he thinks is relevant to the debate. I have accepted this challenge and would like to present the last paragraph of Pros argument in Round 2. He says that the watchdog groups do not have anything to do with the fairness…
- First of all I said Pro's opinion was right-winged; not the history lesson off Wikipedia. Pro might want to study some more history. I'm glad he was up to another round, though I wish Pro knew what he was talking about. 1. Pro said that by virtue of ownership the government has…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?