Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 40
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1951.
Libertarianism offers the best path for society
For
- Let's look at our competing arguments: "His main strategy is infiltration…." – Sieben More accurately my plan would be to infiltrate an existing party, and by use of effective persuasion and marketing permeate both the party and political positions throughout the country at a…
- "1) Goal of Libertarian Activism: To promote a stable environment for individual freedom and property rights" -Agreed. "A) Voters are Rationally Ignorant" – Sieben. A subjective statement that is wholly irrelevant to the debate. Because they may be irrational and ignorant by…
Against
- == Pro Plan == His main strategy is infiltration. He offers some historical examples for consideration: KKK – The successes of this movement were not a result of mass awareness and participation. Poll taxes and literacy laws effectively excluded poor blacks and whites at local…
- 1) Goal of Libertarian Activism To promote a stable environment for individual freedom and property rights 2) Political Means A) Voters are Rationally Ignorant The vote margin in this most recent election was just under 10 million [1]. Even in much smaller democracies, margins…
- 1952.
Congress should pass a law limiting discrimination at US polling places
For
- Ok, again the fact your attacking this woman shows how arrogant you are. You attack her personal problems instead of addressing her right to vote. So since you didn't refute the opportunity cost i'm displaying I win this point. you go on to say only 11% of Americans don't have…
- I'm so glad you jumped on this, thanks. Ok just to start, I will address states taking charge: States are likely/will to abuse the fact that they can pass voting laws. Texas is a clear example, they have tried several time, the most recent this past summer, to pass laws that…
Against
- You're welcome to criticize me all you want, call me arrogant, call my figures BS. It's a classic tactic used by the losing party- When all else fails, attack the debater instead of the topic. 1- my 11% is not BS. I took the numbers from the ACLU, so unless you think they are…
- Nobody is asking anyone to produce 5 IDs. All a person has to do is produce 1 of 5; whether it be a drivers license, passport, non-driver ID, military ID or handgun license is irrelevant. All they need is ONE of the above. In the event a person cannot come up with 1 acceptable…
- 1953.
America should adopt anarchy
For
- It took you a while to respond to the arguement lol. "Just no to anarchy. That means no government. That means no social security. No laws. No enforcement of laws. No social services. Anarchy opens up and allows dictators etc. etc. to take over. We would become totalitarian…
- Anarchy is very misunderstood! As most people would have you believe the opposite, Anarchy does not mean chaos, nihilism, or any other term of the sort. It is in fact quite the contrary, Anarchism implies a society that is governed neither by rules or rulers, but rather by…
Against
- :) 1. They say no dictators - can you think of anywhere on the earth where people oppose the government and there is no government? That's right, you can't. Think of Cuba. Some countries in Africa. Dictators. Someone WILL step up to power to try to lead the nation. 2. He says…
- *I had to do this quickly* Just no to anarchy. That means no government. That means no social security. No laws. No enforcement of laws. No social services. Anarchy opens up and allows dictators etc. etc. to take over. We would become totalitarian very quickly. No president. No…
- 1954.
A middle-class president would be more effective than a wealthy one
For
- Laptop breakdown again?
- We have had many businessmen serve as president in the last couple of decades and yet they have continuously driven the country into debt by an order of magnitude. Clearly having a businessmen in charge is not the answer. We are at 17.2 trillion dollars of debt and George W.…
Against
- Sorry, my laptop had a little breakdown, but its fixed now. And i completely agree with you about the Obamacare law. It is a horrible thing. and Also i don't want someone who was rich by birth. Let me clarify, i Think a businessman would be better. An entrepreneur. They…
- I accept this challenge. Im guessing that you think a middle class electorate would be better. I don't think one would be bad, I will argue that businessman would be better, as one of America's biggest trials right now is debt.
- 1955.
The United States should annex Canada
For
- We Americans have always had a philosophy of expanding our territory and influence, and there is no concrete evidence on why we should cease to grow as a nation. The 13 provinces of Canada and 50 American states could be mutually to each other if we served In a union together:…
- In this round I intended to rebuild and reinforce my contentions, and I thank joebob4547 for his opposition. 1) A recent poll showed that a growing number (20%, higher in quebec) of Canadians and a growing 40% of Americans support American annexation of Canada, also since 1980…
Against
- There are more harms that come of the annexation of Canada then there is good.1) Firstly, annexation of Canada will not prove easily. Canada has not shown any signs of wanting to be annexed, and there will be opposition to the new leadership of Canada.2) Secondly, there are…
- Equality2447's account is not active, so I guess this round is a tie
- 1956.
Anarchy would be a practical and effective system of government
For
- Since the title of the debate is a little convoluted, my argument is that anarchy is practical and effective when compared to other forms of human organization. I argue that anarchy is practical in the sense that it can be used by anybody to address any number of issues. It is…
- Apparently there is a troll problem on this site, which has lead to restrictions. I understand that, but I will not accept someone who has no record and joined six days before me to limit my entrance into their debate. So I have created my own (in true anarchist spirit). I am…
Against
- It is dissapointing to see a forfeit in such a short debate.Regardless my points still stand and the Pro has not addressed the two fallacious claims he listed in the previous round.My thanks goes out to the Pro regardless for his worthwile initial post.
- The Pro has posted a great introduction so I will start with my three main points.1. Anarchism Denies Human NatureOne of the most intrinsic aspects of human interaction and involvement is empowerment. Humans beings from the dawn of history have always sought to empower…
- 1957.
Nuclear weapons should be abolished worldwide
For
- If a country gets caught developing nuclear weapons, we will have economic sanctions on the country and we will have the leader of the country go to a place where a nuclear bomb was dropped, for example, Hiroshima to see the damage made by the nuclear bombs. The United Nations…
- If we don't ban nuclear weapons quickly, there is a possibility that a country will release their nuclear weapons. The largest nuclear bomb is equivalent to fifty-million tons of TNT. In perspective, that is about 3333 times more powerful than little boy, the bomb dropped on…
Against
- How can the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency be so sure that other countries aren't developing nuclear weapons secretly? Remember, you are only pointing out that it is dangerous. However, I will point it out again that it is also for safety reasons. If…
- You are correct. However, there has been only one incident of that. Dropping nuclear weapons is a rare thing. Even if it is shot, we can shoot back at them if we have nuclear weapon so it is technically like revenge. Right? If you say you want to ban it, how will you ban it?…
- 1958.
Quebec should pursue independence from Canada
For
- Let me address some specific points that you raise. 1) monetary policies: I believe that government ability to manipulate currency is a very dangerous thing. Devaluation may sometimes serve as a short term palliative. Sometimes it will trigger inflation wave making things only…
- I mostly agree with your premises but not with the conclusion. In the short term Quebec's economic situation is indeed likely to get worse after the independence. However, the long term consequences of continued dependence on external subsidies can be even worse (consider, for…
Against
- Hi,First off, thank you for taking the time to enter into debate with me.I wish to first restate that my position is that Quebec should not seek independence. My reasons for stating this are that the people of Quebec will face economic strain, lose potential political…
- Quebec independence has in recent months increasingly come under scrutiny as a viable political option for the people of Quebec. This is in large part to the recent massive defeat of the main pro-sovereignty party of Quebec, the PQ, as well as polls showing that the movement is…
- 1959.
The United States should bomb Mexico
For
- Mexico is a weak as s country with a small military, if they even tried to go tpo war weith the united states we would nuke them until all of them are gone. We have some bad hombres down south
- Mexico is a disqusting place and is poor af , they smell like garbage too and are ugly
Against
- did you read ANY of what i said? we need mexico, mexico needs us. also, they would not be going to war with us because they decided to! it would be called "self defense" because WE went to war with them first! at least according to your crazy battle plan. besides, why fight…
- sir, mexico is one of our allies. if we bomb them, they may very well bomb us. i am almost positive that you are a trump supporter. the cleanliness of a nation is no cause for violence. they are a separate nation with a separate culture. they do not deserve our hatred. they…
- 1960.
The US should withdraw military presence and aid from South Korea
For
- Rebuttal 1: Comparative analysis My opponent asks for the two countries in question, South Korea and North Korea, to be compared. I will do this. First, we need to understand what my opponent has conceded in the last round. "Then he talks about how North Korea has rocked the…
- Rebuttal 1: My opponent's observations I will break this down as simply as possible within sub-points. a. My first contention My opponent has four different responses that I will address. First, he responds that the validity of Global Fire Power is weak. I concede this after…
Against
- I'll start on extensions, his responses to my case, and then economic aid.==Overview==He drops all of it, conceded. Remember, he needs to win on both military presence and economic aid to win the round. This is the resolution he created and advocated for, he needs to meet this…
- I'll start off on observations/overview, then go top to bottom on the affirmative case, and then go onto negative case.==Overview== Recognize that today's round, the BOP might be shared, but he has to prove that we should withdraw both military presence and economic aid. If you…
- 1961.
Socialism is a step backward for human progress
For
- "As you can see by the definitions above, socialism is not communism." My opponent rejects my source that proves that indeed socialism is very much like communism. But sence he makes no attempt to even discuss the content of my source but instead chooses to mock the name of the…
- Capitalism always works when the rule of law is enforced. I say this because there are examples of the failure of capitalism but all have one thing in common, the rule of law was not enforced and corruption was allowed to take hold. This is precisely what is happening with this…
Against
- Let me begin by pointing out that Pro has made a number of radical claims but does not use a single source to back it up. I will list his unsupported claims below. However, I will address them. Unsupported Claims: 1. "Private property rights have been completely eliminated and…
- I would like to open by pointing out that Pro did not address my claims, choosing instead to print anti-socialist propaganda with no evidence to support his case. I would once again ask my opponent that in the final round he utilize the many sources available to him on this…
- 1962.
England should abolish its monarchy
For
- Thank you for your opening statement Con.In reverse then," The British Tourism Agency has calculated that Monarchy-related tourism generates an average of $767 million for the British economy every year. Compare that to even the most liberal estimates...which come out to $307…
- I must quickly correct the title and say that I mean the whole of the United Kingdom as a monarchy. Also, no new arguments in the conclusion. Ever since the 800s, Kings and Queens have been coming and going as rulers of Britain. The tradition, as I consider it, has long been…
Against
- I hate rigid round structures. It would be way better if I could just do my arguments and rebuttals together, but I'll go ahead and conform to the rules. Here's a short constructive case: - C1) Symbolic Value The British Monarchy serves as an essential symbol for the country's…
- I accept.
- 1963.
Governments should protect minority groups' cultures
For
- I believe that the minority's group should be protected from the government because if the government protects the minorities, the government can receive taxes from the minorities. For example, China's more than 5000 minority groups, if China supports them the China government…
Against
- Even if you do not agree with my arguments, Pro made no affirmative arguments, so I should win by default. Please vote for me =)
- Despite hanwoo's tactical decision to avoid affirming the resolution, I cannot give up a turn to bypass making arguments, else I will only be responding in the last round (which is unfair to Pro). Hence, despite the BoP still not being fulfilled by Pro, I will still make…
- 1964.
Electronic direct democracy should replace representative democracy everywhere
For
- I am sorry, for some reason, Con couldn't place his arguments in the second round. I continue with my position nevertheless. Enough is enough, people had enough of seeing the huge gap between the policies preached and the actual things happening in their real lives. Flexibility…
- Thank you very much to Con for such a wonderful argument. But all those points have been sorted out in favor of Edemocracy that I can explain now. 1. It is the opposite of giving absolute power to anybody. President & Parliaments will be our messengers doing what we vote for.…
Against
- Hello, I argue against the idea of Edemocracy. Although a noble idea to update politics to today's technology, it would not be possible for these reasons; 1. This is just a updated idea of a direct democracy, our founding fathers were against and created the Electoral College…
- 1965.
The United States should end Plan Colombia
For
- okay well I guess so you won I have nothing else to say thank you for this debate and you're time.
- thank you I'm done
Against
- Since your argument is for the side I'm arguing that is why I can only see a con ballet and I have no argument that were possibly able to respond to.
- All three of my evidence states there qualifications and websites they came from
- 1966.
The press should be regulated
For
- The British tabloid press isn't so much free as in freefall. Tabloid journalism in the UK has always been reckless and arrogant in pursuit of the trivial, but as advertising revenue dwindles that trend looks set to get worse
- There have to be limits to the permissible levels of intrusion into people's lives, in an increasingly connected world people- celebrities or not- have never been more conscious of this simple fact.
Against
- Who does the regulating? All of the obvious bodies – police, parliament and so on – haven't exactly shown themselves to be whiter than white in the last year or so.
- All of those involved in the phone hacking cases broke laws. Existing laws. They can be prosecuted under existing frameworks and cases are already being pursued. There is no need for another set of controls
- 1967.
Term limits undermine the principles of democracy
For
- 'POOR CONDUCT' My apologies if I offended you, however I was under the impression that this was a debate, not a chat over some tea. I may have been sarcastic, however I would hardly consider that poor conduct. Now if I were to insult you, call you a moron, or use other…
- 'MONOPOLY'People traditionally vote for the incumbent, that is true. However, it is not an absolute constant. If a leading government official has been in office for some time and they have failed to stop or, contributed to, issues such as rising unemployment and declining GDP,…
Against
- Fin
- Links that I posted used to appear as videos right in the debate. If anyone can tell me why that is changed, and if and how I can fix it, that'd be great.
- 1968.
China should be required to follow international human rights law
For
- Round 1- Accept Round 2- Main Points Round 3- Conclusion China is an international super power that has gotten away with not following the International Human Rights Law. It has avoided economic sanctions placed on other countries (Iran, North Korea, Cuba, etc.) simply because…
Against
- Thank you.
- International Law should not apply to China because it is not enforced on nations like the United States. Also, there are some very silly standards. Apparently internet access is a human right. No nation should be forced to accept this.
- 1969.
Media censorship should be banned worldwide
For
- 1) The media holds a great impact on society. Essentially media is a tool by which the opinions and views of people is molded [1]. This means that with censorship, as applied by a the state, can cause people to think in the point of view that the government wants them to think…
- Here are some basic definitions that clarify the debate. 1) Media censorship- To examine media sources and prevent publication of information thought to be unacceptable. [1] 2)Banned-Forbidden by law. [2] 3) Internationally- Throughout the world. [3] I will be arguing for the…
Against
- Unfortunately my opponent has been unable to post her response in time. I have not heard back from her so I cannot be certain if she is going through a troubling time in her personal or family life. I was hoping to expand and add some clarity on my points but I would think it…
- Addressing Opponents Main Points 1) Media molds the opinions and views of society. When censorship is applied to a state the government can stop the spread of one idea to destroy the undermining of ideas it does support. My opponent speaks true when he states that the media…
- 1970.
The United States should ban political parties
For
- Your argument is agreeable, government does not have the right to take away our choice to have an opinion- yes. But then it should be the people's choice to realize that political parties do harm for our government. Political parties have only one thing in common- money. Due to…
- Let's get this debate started... In America there are way too many political parties- Democrats, Republican, Green, Libertarian, and Constitution Party (those are just the major ones). Though I won't dwell deep into the numbers of parties we also have: the Communist Party of…
Against
- I will reiterate my overarching ideas, in a short, summed up paragraph. To remove political parties would involve some type of government body, to take action. It would cause unnecessary conflict. Any type of conflict right now is bad conflict. It's also simply unjust to tell…
- I will just open up with rebuttals, seeing to how you already know my argument inside and out. "Your argument is agreeable, government does not have the right to take away our choice to have an opinion- yes. But then it should be the people's choice to realize that political…
- 1971.
Presidents should serve six-year terms with no limit on number of terms
For
- Frame work: 1. I am referring to presidents of the United States of America. 2. The overlying assumption is that they are duly elected for each term. 3. I am referring to changing the current system for the future, not saying that this would have been better in the past. 4.…
- >>There are a number of reasons that the founding fathers set it up this way… this is not an improvement and not worth making. Actually the founding fathers didn't set it up this way. There have been two big changes since they set it up. The president's terms have been limited.…
Against
- This is a terrible idea. Six year non-consecutive terms are a horrible idea. 1) The senate currently has six year terms. This would sync the presidency with one of the three senate groups so that a third of the senate would *always* be elected at the same time as the president.…
- Wasting money on an extra election when the current system works just fine isn't helpful. Further you're still going to sync up between some of the senate elections which effectively makes the senate classes very different when the entire point is that they are suppose to be…
- 1972.
China should abandon its one-child policy
For
- The one child policy is ignored by Chinas elite
- The one child policy results in sweeping human rights violations
Against
- Single child families are economically efficient
- The one child policy is needed for population control
- 1973.
EU members should unite into a single state
For
- I forefit
- I am new at this also so lets have some practice. "The incompatibility of contrasting social mentalities" there is many different social mentalities everywhere. Look in your own home did you ever see eye to eye with your parents? or siblings? There is always incompatibility but…
Against
- Um, well, I repeat my previous argument and will add in this point. In Germany, the attitude towards laws is that they are meant to be followed. In Ireland, the attitude is that they were meant to be broken. As in a single country, there must a a universal interpretation on the…
- Having said that, now on with the debate. By EU countries form one state, I interpret that a single state is one with 1 set of laws and 1 government. In order to prove that it would be a good idea to have EU countries to unite, I challenge my opponent to prove 1. All…
- 1974.
Romania should lower the voting age to 16
For
- Citizens - have the right to vote at 18 years of age by election day. No voting mentally deficient or alienated, laid under interdiction, and no person convicted by final judgment, the election disqualifications Romania - is a national, sovereign and independent, unitary and…
Against
- This is the sixth debate that has been forfeited to me in a row. Honestly, am I that good? I haven't even made my argument yet!Vote con guys. Pro has failed their burden of proof.
- As you may have guessed I accept my opponent's challenge. I have no further clarifications to offer, except to note that pro assumes complete burden of proof. My purpose is to show that Romania's democracy isn't broken, doesn't need fixing, and even if it did, 16-year-olds…
- 1975.
The US should guarantee equal constitutional rights to everyone on its soil
For
- I apologize for CLEARLY being an idiot & making a mistake on my first try. & NO we AREN'T going to use LD structure. I think that we SHOULD give the same constitution rights to ALL people because really, there is NO point in discriminating just becuase some people are here…
- Yeah this is my first time. I don't know what your fancy jargon means but I'll take a stab anyways. I'm guessing that your FOR "The US Gov has a moral obligation to afford the same constitutional rights to all people on US soil." If not, then my profuse apologies. No, I don't…
Against
- I guess we aren't going to use LD structure then. I am arguing AGAINST, clearly since my side is CON. You can pull my opponents argument of illegal aliens to my side, because they shouldn't be given the same constitutional rights. Therefore, since there are no arguments…
- Alright, well this is the topic for NCFL nationals in LD. If I can get a person that debates LD regularly that would definitely be ideal. I'll let aff start since that is usually the custom in LD. Good luck to my opponent!
- 1976.
Freedom must sometimes be sacrificed to preserve morality
For
- I don't have a lot of characters, so forgive me if I skip the pleasantries and cut to the chase. 1. My opponent agrees that freedom to do wrong is a not justified standard of right. Point won by the pro. 2. The sacrificed freedoms we are discussing are the ones that grant the…
- Freedom to do wrong is not a justified standard of right. How could it be? Thus the freedoms that are sacrificed (spelled with a "c", not an "s") are the ones that grant the ability to be immoral. The "contradiction" in my introduction was intended to illustrate that I do not…
Against
- 1. Con refers to Pro's initial statement "some freedom must be sacrificed. Freedom within restriction is good". Pro's initial statement implies that further freedoms must be sacrifised, which means there must be a change so to speak this assertion is supported by another…
- Seems like a very eager opponent who declares victory long before its been attained, but anyway"Freedom to do wrong is not a justified standard of right"That is known throughout the world, and no constitution grants a person a freedom to do something that is regarded as wrongul…
- 1977.
Government should get out of the marriage business
For
- Those who oppose gay marriage believe deeply that marriage is sacreda divine, a blessed sacrament between man and woman as ordained in the Bible. If they are right, then the entire concept of marriage has no place in our civil society, which recognizes the separation between…
- Government should get out of the marriage business. If the government had nothing to do with marriage, we could drop all the divisive issues about gay marriage, and just let people marry in whichever churches or other institutions will marry them. Taxing all individuals the…
Against
- You say that government should stay out of marriage but then seem to take it back when you allude to the legal chaos it would cause. The problem with giving marriage over to private institutions like churches is that some marriage-granting institutions would likely become…
- But why must me redefine the institution of marriage in order for it to 'remain' a sacred religious sacrament? The institution of marriage predates recorded human history. It predates the Bible, the Koran, and all of the world's major religions. As long as there have been…
- 1978.
Patriotism is ultimately destructive
For
- I challenge my opponent to outline, in great detail, why he/she believes that patriotism is not ultimately destructive. This necessitates a definition followed by an in depth analysis of his/her position.
Against
- You haven't met your BOP at all.
- I shall first separate the concepts named jingoism and patriotism.Patriotism[1]: Vigorous support for one's country.Jingoism[2]: Extreme patriotism, especially in the form of aggressive or warlike foreign policy.Aggressively supporting your country to damage others is…
- 1979.
North Korea poses a greater threat to US security than Iran
For
- You must look to my case seeing how it has not even been contested and his has been attacked and dropped.
- still all points extended..
Against
- For the purpose of this debate, I would like to define the following terms used in the resolution: Threat: A prevalent force imposing harm or danger National Security: The defense and foreign relations of a country, including protection of its interests (dictionary.com)…
- 1980.
The current government is not sustainable
For
- CanWeKnow, In your opening statement there are too many assumptions that simply are not true. To begin with, The Federal Republic governmental system is not set in stone. In theory it is independent from our economy, however, our government has become more than a federal…
- America's debt is climbing further and further yet most people are convinced that everything that went wrong back in 2008 has been fixed. Both major parties seem to believe that we can simply keep acquiring debt and have nothing happening. Now, If this sounds hard to believe, I…
Against
- Pro's forfeit of the final round says it all. For my concluding argument I will simply restate my most valuable points.1. The governmental system is separate from the economic system. While it's true that a governmental system's form can influence an economics system's form,…
- Thank you for your response copper29.Here is my response to your accusations of validity.1) Pro is very correct in saying that the Federal Republic System is not set in stone, because in truth it is set in paper with ink that was hand written by our founding fathers. The…
- 1981.
The US should end Plan Colombia
For
- We stand in favor for the following reasons on to our first evidence: Plan Colombia: Drug War Is A Fail Plan Colombia: Washington"s Latest Drug War Failure Ted Galen Carpenter is vice president for defense and foreign-policy studies at the Cato Institute July 27, 2001…
- "It's not the drugs that make you a drug addict it's the escape from reality"- Anonymous This quote goes with the reason why drugs are bad but why we don't need to help them stop others. For this reason, my partner and I stand in favor of the resolved. Resolved: The United…
Against
- Drugs are a big thing in Columbia. There was originally 700 metric tons of cocaine produced per year in Columbia, before Plan Columbia was a thing. We have an obligation as the United States to help Columbia with this problem. For this reason, my partner and I oppose the…
- Your first piece of evidence is from 2001, that's 15 years ago, therefore, this piece of evidence should be dropped from the debate because this evidence is no longer true to the current year. In your second point, you stated that the FARC is working to sabotage the efforts of…
- 1982.
The spread of nuclear weapons may be beneficial
For
- Deterrence
- both sides will avoid threatening vital interests
Against
- Proliferation risks
- Pre-emptive Nuclear war
- 1983.
United Nations peacekeepers should have the power to engage in offensive operations
For
- Firstly, I apologize to all voters for the sources. I copied and pasted the links from an old debate of mine which linked a photo album with screen shots of my evidence. When I copied and pasted, only the "debate.org" part must of went through. Here are the sources used for…
- Pro I affirm the resolution which states resolved: UN peacekeepers should have the power to engage in offensive operations. Observation: The power bestowed upon peacekeepers to use offensive operations is not a power that is necessarily used in all cases; it is a tool in the…
Against
- ------------------------------------------------Con Rebuttal------------------------------------------------Rebuttal 1: My opponent's 1st contention is that Military Peacekeeping Requires OffenseMilitary peacekeeping does NOT require offense. My opponent brought up the Rwandan…
- The topic of this debate is Resolved: United Nations peacekeepers should have the power to engage in offensive operations. This is a Public Forum style of debate, but any philosophies/values involved will be accepted. R1: Both sides present their case R2: Rebuttal against…
- 1984.
Civilian harm in Ukraine's war justifies international intervention
For
- "I would like to sincerely apologize for not giving this debate more of my attention."That's alright, I too have been very busy lately.REBUTTALS:"All land held by the separatists is legally part of Ukraine. Thus, all the land the separatists occupy has been encroached…
- I agree that evil is "profound immorality" and that fascist also has a nationalist and racist connotation. I now move on to address my opponent's rebuttals. "Ukraine preemptively warned civilians of the coming danger and advised them to evacuate the region." I read my…
Against
- I will address the arguments presented in R4 and then review the debate with a view to why a Con ballot is merited. Thanks to anyone who has taken the time to read this debate and to Russian for instigating it and participating in it with me. REBUTTALS P1: Preemptive Warning…
- I would like to sincerely apologize for not giving this debate more of my attention. With 3 mafia forum games going on, a tournament I am running, and several other active debates I am contesting, I have been pressed for time. I thank my opponent once again for this debate, and…
- 1985.
First-world governments should give financial aid to developing nations
For
- I apologize for my forfeit. I am starting school in 3 days.
- I would now like to provide some refutation and present some of my own contentions. Foreign aid is given to the governments of these 3rd world countries. That is correct; the money is given to the government. Firstly, if you look at my uncontested definition, in no part does it…
Against
- My opponent has forfieted the third round. You have one more chance to counter my round 3 arguement.
- This is the start of the 3rd roundI don't know where my opponent is getting his statistics as AIDS/HIV in Africa has steadily been dropping I got this from google public data (All info comes from the World Bank). This statistic says other wise, I'll start off with some…
- 1986.
North Korea has some positive qualities
For
- First of all, If you are some elo 9000 leaderboard guy, Don`t accept this. Go find someone your own talent.
- My opponent says that North Korea is bad because it`s communist. However, This still does not refute how North Korea has a good literacy rate. This argument Penetrates any Attempted rebuttal, Unless my Opponent uses a direct, solid argument. My Opponent chooses to not, And…
Against
- North Korea. Communism, Armed for nuclear warfare, poverty struck and worst of all there's Kim Jong-un running the show. What possibly could be good about the crumbling society that North Korea is? Good Luck to the Pro
- In Pro's previous arguments he has stated communist countries in general have high literacy rates only to now change his argument to say North Korea in separate has high literacy rates. Pro seems to get confused quite a lot through his previous rebuttals. As a consequence of…
- 1987.
New York should increase funding for public safety
For
- Once again I don't know if you read correctly but when I say description for a crime, the crimes are committed because unfortunately we don't live in heaven. For example: Lady gets robbed at gun point and calls 911 gives the description of a white male, blue jeans, shirt and a…
- Sir civilians never know why they are really stopped you guys just want to believe what you want, I work for the department and really care about protecting people , most of the time a crime is committed we stop everyone who fits the description of the perpetrator with the hope…
Against
- The problem is that people don't have any reason to be stopped. They have done nothing to arouse the suspicion of cops and therefore they shouldn't legally be able to be stopped unless there is something that actually points to criminal activity. The stop and frisk program does…
- The issue is not with the amount of crime that occurs, but with the right of citizens not to have their privacy violated without probable cause. There are many different options that could be used to lower crime rates, but many cannot be instituted without gross violations of a…
- 1988.
Ron Paul was an admirable politician
For
- Indeed, the different ways to say the word dinosaur are both insightful, and equally intelligent. I think Ron Paul would agree that he is older than dinosaurs, considering that he created God. Which is part of why he is amazing. Onto the song in Spanish... Many Ron Paul…
- While I concede my opponent's argument regarding him being everybody, and therefore him not being pleased and hitler and that stuff. However, he is deeply mistaken with the second half of his argument regarding how to properly wash oneself after #2. It was informative and…
Against
- This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time. SORPRESA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- I feel like a jack a**. Ron Paul tastes like ham. Islamofascists do not eat ham. That means that islamofascists love Ron Paul. Yo probablemente no deber�a decir esto Pero a veces me siento tan asustada cuando pienso sobre el anterior Relaci�n con que hemos compartido Es…
- 1989.
Communism is the best form of government in theory
For
- Extend all arguments Class Struggle: con agree's that it has been a part of human struggle and re aferms my point. Checks and Balence: Having a middle class that evryone is in IS structure, and might remind you that this is on PAPER, and so any arguements pretaining to prctice…
- The Communist Manifesto can be broken down into multiple key points: 1: History can be viewed as a constant class struggle Marx and Engel argued that history has always been the same, from living standards to revolutions and that often classes divide us more than nationality,…
Against
- Communism is not the only government that sounds good on paper. Democracy sounds great because the people are able to directly contribute to their government. Fascism sounds great because it is all about control so nobody rises up. Anarchy sounds great because there is no…
- I would like to argue that a democratic republic with a capitalist economy is a great form of government. 1: Class Struggle/ Economy I would agree that class struggle has been a problem throughout history. The question always is how do you end this struggle between the classes.…
- 1990.
A society controlled by the military would have high amounts of unity and lawfulness
For
- I never once claimed "that any society that is controlled by the military will always be lawful and have unity." I understand that people are individuals. Your points concerning Germany are true for that example. However, I never once stated how this government would operate…
- A military society would have less of all ills that plague man such as murder, theft, rape, and others if military principles were completely integrated into the society. This is due to the the fact that military tradition and expectations include complete control of ones self…
Against
- We are debating"A society that is controlled by the military would have high amounts of unity and lawfulness"I will now offer rebuttalsRebuttal 1" I never once stated how this government would operate "You do not have to state this is how the society would operate, I made a…
- Lets look at the topic that we are debating. A society that is "controlled" by the military would have unity and lawfulness.There is a lot of flaws withing this statement. Lets define some of the terms we are going to be discussing. Military - The armed forces of a…
- 1991.
Democracy should not be used where most citizens are uneducated
For
- I guess I didn't clarify it enough. Your argument is: "Democracy in a country with a majority population of uneducated and poverty stricken citizens whereby government is voted in by the people is not successful because the majority who vote for a party are at high risk to…
- You state that considering the U.S. is irrelevant to the situation and you decide to steer the debate towards 3rd world countries. You only make one argument which is the case that the "uneducated" is being bribed by the government officials to elect for a certain…
Against
- Just to clarify, this is the debate topic: "Democracy in a country with a majority population of uneducated and poverty stricken citizens whereby government is voted in by the people is not successful because the majority who vote for a party are at high risk to manipulation."…
- I believe that referring to the US is irrelevant here as I'm sure we can both agree that their average "literacy" levels are of what you would expect in a first world country. In my argument I am referring to third world countries and only third world countries. Predominantly…
- 1992.
Libertarianism is a better political philosophy than liberalism
For
- Libertairanism is a modern ideology so why would you assume that we are discussing a old and irrelevant version of liberalism that has essentially evolved into Libertairanism?
- Libertarianism is defined as a political philosophy advocating only minimal state intervention in the lives of citizens. Allowing citizens of a state to live how they choose without the government permitting them to do so. Supports the free market and promotes liberty. Modern…
Against
- Dawson, It seems you haven't done much research on what liberalism is, because it is A political ideology founded on the ideas of liberty and equality, but you defined modern liberalism, which is a bit different because it focuses more on civil liberties and over all equality…
- actually it does because it allows people to be discriminatory.
- 1993.
Classical liberalism is more effective than conservatism
For
- Round 1: Acceptance Round 2: Introduce and Expand on Arguments Round 3: Rebuttals Round 4: Counter-rebuttals/Conclusions NOTE: I am arguing for the more general Classical Liberalism, not the version specific only to the United States. My definitions of both worldviews are as…
- To clarify your earlier statement about my lack of sources, I am basing my arguments on logical reasoning. However, to avoid further conflict, I will cite sources for the remainder of the debate. Here are my rebuttals to your arguments: 1. The concept of freedom of religion is…
Against
- I accept.
- My opponent has forfeit the last round, I cannot make any rebuttal. Thank you voters for reading this debate.
- 1994.
Congressional earmarks should be abolished
For
- Earmarks erode trust in the government
- Earmarks do not represent an efficient use of taxpayers' money
Against
- Earmarking should become a transparent and publicly monitored process
- Imposing a ban on earmarking will destabilise congrerss
- 1995.
Natural resources harm foreign policy in the Middle East
For
- Chokepoints
- Oil = Rentier economies = weak internal cohesion
Against
- Interdependance
- Brings in external powers
- 1996.
The two-party system in the United States does not adequately represent the people
For
- Sorry for the delay I went out to eat. Anyways Before I get into answering your points I think what artC said is relevant to what we are discussing the two party system forces the media to focus on the two parties and doesn't allow for the other parties views to go main stream.…
- Off your first point about there is not an official two party system I have the following responses: 1)ಠ_ಠ 2) I realized that there are multiple political parties when I wrote this and the intention was to evaluate the paradigm of two dominant parties in the United states. 3) I…
Against
- "Off your first point about there is not an official two party system I have the following responses: 1)ಠ_ಠ" I'm sorry, but you're apparently going to have to repeat that one. "2) I realized that there are multiple political parties when I wrote this and the intention was to…
- Malaki, I'm not sure this is going to wind up being quite the debate you'd intended, but...well, we'll see. Your profile shows that you're 17, so I have to assume that you have never actually voted in the U.S., and may not have ever seen an official ballot. It may therefore…
- 1997.
A border wall would do little to reduce illegal immigration
For
- GG man
- Well done you have proved me wrong!! By the way this was supposed to be a prove me wrong like thing and I support the idea of having a Bigger Better wall.
Against
- Good game. Do I win? Please respond in the comments. http://www.foxnews.com...
- You asked if the border wall will do anything? Whether or not you agree with the concept of a border wall, it will reduce illegal immigration, so it won't do NOTHING. Israel and even Mexico have walls and the illegal immigration from the middle east and Guatemala respectively…
- 1998.
Government foreign aid does more good than harm
For
- CON did not address nor refute my distinction on practicality versus morality, and continued his argument based on a purely practical basis. Each of his supposed "well-sourced reasons" are the same as they were in round 2. 1. From round 1, I established that human beings are…
- Con makes a good argument. He refers to the misuse of foreign aid by foreign governments and refers to the hidden agenda possibly behind the offer of foreign aid. HOWEVER, he does so under a limited scope. He does not account for foreign aid in the event of an emergency.…
Against
- === FINAL REBUTTAL === PRO ends the debate in the same vein he began it, as the entirety of his side of the debate was an emotive argument. In PRO's mind the United States ought to give aid, especially in emergencies, simply on the notion that certain nations cannot help…
- Judging by the quality of PRO's writing abilities, I trust this will make for an excellent debate. === REBUTTALS === PRO begins the rebuttal with a few clarifications and a quote by Christine Korsgaard. She was quoted as stating, "the moral law is the ultimate source of…
- 1999.
South Ossetia should be recognized as an independent state
For
- Modern Georgia never really controlled S. Ossetia.
- S. Ossetia legitimately gained independence at break-up of USSR
Against
- Self-determination is not absolute; S. Ossetia does not qualify.
- Multiple languages are common in modern nation states.
- 2000.
Kim Jong Il was not a good leader of North Korea
For
- I extend all my arguments about why Kim Jung Il was a bad leader and I extend my funny pictures as well
- "U DOT C KIM DESTROYING AFRICA SLOWLY BUT SURELY"Thats not the debate here, the debate is over whether or not Kim Jung Il was a good leader of North Korea, and I have shown how that Kim Jung Il has done more damage to his own country than Stalin did to Russia(pauses to let the…
Against
- YOUR A PRICK!!! ROT IN HELL MPERIALIST SUPPORTER!!! HOPE UFEEL GOOD ABOUT YOURSELF!! Y DONT YOU HAVE A GO AT EUROPEAN AND AND WESTERN LEADERS FOR WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND DID TO THE WHOLE OF AFRICA!! SLAVE TRADE and EMPIRES, THE MOST COURSE OF DEATH AND MST IN-HUMAIN THING EVER…
- Ok then. Your not just going to call me a wacked out commy and not believe my evidence are you?
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?