Discussly

Religion Debate Topics — page 51

3,675 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 51 of 74
  1. 2501.

    Orthodox Christians should convert to Islam

    For

    • Con believes that Mohammad was "the most remarkable man that ever set foot on this earth." Let"s compare him to Jesus and see if that is true: (1) Jesus was miraculously born of a virgin (Sura 19, Maryam, verses 16-21; Luke 1:26-38), Mohammad had a natural birth (2) Jesus…
    • "Given to an Unlettered Prophet (Qur"an 7:157)"(How do we know that? Because it says so in the Qur"an and his enemies never called him a liar)." Jesus was the Son of God who died on the cross. (Matt 16:21; 17:22-23; Luke 24:19-27, 44-46) How do we know that? Because Jesus said…

    Against

    • Mohummed , the prophet of Islam You may be an atheist or an agnostic or you may belong to any of the religious denominations that exist in the world today. You may have been a Communist or a believer in democracy and freedom. No matter what you are, and no matter what your…
    • Scientific facts: Embryology in The Qur"an " (Quran 23:12-14) The Big Bang Theory " (Quran 21:30) The Expansion of the universe " (Quran 51:47) Given to an Unlettered Prophet (Qur"an 7:157) The book was given to a man who could not read or write (How do we know that? Because it…
  2. 2502.

    The existence of gods can be rationally justified

    For

    • I assume my opponent accepts my definition and resolution by saying nothing against them. I wish to split my case into two parts, evidence for God, and evidence against the currently leading theory of evolution; biological and cosmological. My arguments substantiating my case…
    • I accpet.Definitions:God(s): A supernatural being(s) who created the universe.This is a very popular topic on DDO, I hope to provide you with convincing arguments to assert that:a) It is likey that God exists.b) There is sufficient evidence that God exists.c) Even if there was…

    Against

    • My argument that there is no reason to believe that gods exist speaks for itself. Do you have reasons to believe gods exist? Until you provide any, I am logical in saying that there is no reason to believe that gods exist. God/gods either exist or they do not. I am not…
    • I am arguing that there is no reason to believe that gods exist. I cannot prove that gods do not exist, but I am not convinced that they do. The default position should be that there are no gods and the burden of proof lies on the theist. This kind of process is how we treat…
  3. 2503.

    Childhood religious indoctrination constitutes psychological abuse

    For

    • My opponent has hamstrung his own argument by admitting he is referring to "the indoctrination practices common to ALL DENOMINATIONS within ALL the world's major religions" while at the same time seeking to discount Wahhibist Muslims and their indoctrination practices because…
    • I feel I should note that I assume for the most part that we are talking of Christian socialization in Western cultures, but since this is not specified, I will bring in some other examples from around the world. --- Terrorizing --- Defined in relevant part as "setting…

    Against

    • My opponent has miscomprehended the first paragraph. By "...the indoctrination practices common to all denominations within all the world's major religions", will my opponent please take note that this means indoctrination practices which are *universal* to those world…
    • May my opponent please note that I have indeed not specified which religion I was referring to. I am in fact referring to the indoctrination practices common to all denominations within all the world's major religions (Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, Shinto,…
  4. 2504.

    Christianity does more harm than good

    For

    • As you have stated earlier, i will try to stay away from saying Christianity can cause harm because of how one group of radicals may think(as you stated westboro would be an example of this). I will ask however that we do not overlook the implications of this. Any religion or…
    • I taking the pro argument will argue that Christianity causes more harm than good. I will go into details as to how it has impacted us through out history, and how it constantly is causing issues within our society. The con will take up the argument and provide evidence as to…

    Against

    • I accept the challenge and look forward to a good debate with Pro. I would like to inform Pro that I am fairly new to this site and so I apologize for any mistakes in form on my part. Pro has said that he will address how Christianity is constantly causing issues in society. I…
    • Your insistence on the word sect only does you a disservice. If Catholicism believes it is different from mainstream Cheistianity, and you agree with that, then we must not even not even bother looking at the actions of Catholicism because it is not Christianity. My inclusion…
  5. 2505.

    The Bible contains scientific errors

    For

    • I. GenesisI apologize for including a passage from the New Testament of the Bible. Here is a more relevant argument:"1. There is the internal evidence of the book of Genesis itself. As already mentioned, chapters 12–50 have always been regarded by the Jewish people as being the…
    • As with him, I am probably going to have to concentrate on a few arguments and maybe drop one or two. I. Backward Progression Genesis 1:1-2: In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep.…

    Against

    • "As already mentioned, chapters 12-50 have always been regarded by the Jewish people as being the record of their own true history," This is simply not true. I just went back through the entire debate my opponent did not say this once. But really this is not relevant at all.…
    • Rebuttal: My opponent rejects taking a non - literal approach to the bible, based on the following: "Matthew 15:9,13 - We must not teach man-made doctrine. " *True believers must accept Bible records of miracles as literal, historic fact. " 1st of all this is a misquoting of…
  6. 2506.

    God's character is consistent across the Old and New Testaments

    For

    • 'k
    • Thanks for accepting.My opponent opens and argues that nothing of the Earth should be worshiped, according to the commandments God gave through Moses. I agree with this. The next part of the argument claims that since Jesus was a human, which reside on Earth, and come from the…

    Against

    • The first commandment (as stated in in Exodus is 20:3) is "You shall have no other gods before[a] me. You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship…
  7. 2507.

    Nature proves Islamic beliefs are the only true beliefs

    For

    • I suppose this mean's you have given up?
    • I am awaiting further response. I am not a fan of preemptive strikes.

    Against

    • Q- 1-There are many religious books in world like Torah for Jews, Bible for Christians, Veda, Gita etc for Hindus and Holy Quran for Muslims . There are Millions differences among them. The followers of these books claim that their book is only the true and others all are…
  8. 2508.

    God has failed as a protector of humanity

    For

    • I thank my opponent for this excellent debate "o Jesus came back in human form o Jesus eating o Reliability of witnesses o Disciples being shocked; Jesus asking why they are surprised" > all these facts from the bible show reasons that might infer that Jesus was not crucified,…
    • My opponent states that according to the Bible, Jesus was never crucified. He backs this up by providing a few quotes from the Bible that can be inferred to mean that Jesus could not have been crucified yet have been resurrected in human form. Now I will show you Bible…

    Against

    • "all these facts from the bible show reasons that might infer that Jesus was not crucified, but under no circumstances do they state that Jesus was never crucified. " This makes absolutely no sense. If Jesus was not crucified, then he was never crucified. Furthermore, the facts…
    • However, my opponent did not address my responses and I do not want to spend time with rebuttals if he is not willing to refute my arguments again. o Jesus came back in human form o Jesus eating o Reliability of witnesses o Disciples being shocked; Jesus asking why they are…
  9. 2509.

    Religious symbols should be removed from public places

    For

    • This is the topic I was suppose to be debating in the tournament, however, my opponent has yet to accept, so I'll simply debate it for fun. As Pro, I will be defending that religious symbols ought to be removed from public places, thus the polar opposite of my stance that my…
    • How unfortunate that his account was deleted. I was very much looking forward to his responce. I'll remind the audience that the judging is not on your personal opinion on whether or not religous symbols should be removed, but on which debater defended that stance better. If…

    Against

    • Thank you for starting the debate. For the record, I actually agree with the topic (generally), but I thought your case would be fun to argue, and I really want to see how you defend some of it. First, I'd like to point out that Merriam-Webster gives multiple definitions of the…
  10. 2510.

    Christianity lacks any valid foundation

    For

    • I have not nor will ever create my own version of Christianity. Christians believe through faith that the miracles presented in the Bible are true. My opponent argues that if the miracles are not true, then Christianity has no valid basis to exist. Again my opponent sees the…
    • Unfortunately, my opponent continues to argue a strawman version of my argument from his atheist position. In failing to concede that Christianity requires that all the miracles to be true in order for it to be called Christianity, he is creating his own entity that he wants to…

    Against

    • I have already shown the audience the proper time to accuse someone of making a straw man fallacy by sharing an example in the previous round. My opponent continues to accuse me of such things not because I commit them, but because he is unable to comprehend my arguments. I…
    • My opponent has accused me of committing a Straw Man fallacy. I will gladly show the audience why my opponent is mistaken. The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented…
  11. 2511.

    If Satan exists, the Bible should not be followed

    For

    • I'd like to begin with a round of thank yous to my opponent for posting a most interesting response to this debate. However I sense some logical fallacies within his arguments so I'm going to begin. My opponent has three arguments, I will cover each in turn. SATAN WAS CREATED…
    • My position is really simple. If Satan exists ,as a dark contrast to god, who occasionally leads people astray then we as people should not follow the teachings of the bible. If god would allow Satan to exist then no one should follow the teachings of the bible. Any takers? =)

    Against

    • I am not sure if my opponents new argument is a joke. If it was not intended to be, then I will still act as if it is. For, if it is not a joke, it's probably offensive. Regardless, let's analyze my opponents arguments as a whole. My opponents opening speech had no clear…
    • The idea that an all-loving God would create evil is troubling for many people, so I thank him for the timeless and worthy discussion. Let me make it clear what the debate is about. This is not a debate about whether God exists or Satan exists, for that is a given from my…
  12. 2512.

    God's non-existence can be proven

    For

    • The Fool says: The Fool knows he is a Fool because he has been fooled so many times before. It is by recognition of his mistakes that the fool becomes a master of Foolery. In this case I mean the art of the recognition of Illusions. The Fool does recognize the popular belief…
    • Yeah I said it.. Everybody would like there to be a god. Who wouldnt want to be sure we have some place to go after we die and have a purpose to life.. I think we have both but are current conception of god needs to be out of the way first. It is not religion that is the…

    Against

    • Pro said: "But I digress, too much teaching not enough Sophist fighting" Rebuttal: You hardly taught a single measure of understandable material. You have yet to bring forth proof to disprove God. This "thing", that you've presented as evidence, is not revealing the absence of…
    • The debate is entitled "The proof of the non-existence of God". Pro has the burden of proof. It is not my burden to prove God exists, but rather that Pro cannot disprove God. I am currently enrolled as an electronics engineering major, although I find it quite arrogant for Pro…
  13. 2513.

    Judaism is incompatible with freedom of belief

    For

    • Hello, I want you to know first that the thing that made me ask the question and start that debate is that I'm considering converting to Judaism for it's logical claims and for they don't say that they are the only ones who will have a share in "Olam Ha-Ba" or the world to…
    • Modern day Judaism says it's with the freedom of belief and diversity in beliefs, so why did the ancient Jews demand Jesus to be killed for having different beliefs than they do? P.S I'm not a Christian fanatic, I only am a seeker for truth, I agree that Judaism isn't with…

    Against

    • Oh well. I guess Judaism doesn't need defending.
    • And now I'm disappointed. Well, I'm the only one in this round with elucidated and supported arguments, so vote for me. Too bad, I really wanted to have this one out.
  14. 2514.

    If God exists, God would be morally culpable for suffering

    For

    • I have to tell you that I instigated this debate in response to the criteria needed to post a comment on another debate. I apologize for my initial lack of thoughtlessness and disregard for everyone related to this forum. You were good enough to respond to a topic so vague the…
    • For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. "For God did not send the son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. (John 3:16- 17) God made the…

    Against

    • As a response to your question God still demands sacrifices just not the same as before. The reason sacrifices were bigger and the reason why animals had to be sacrificed is because Jesus hadn't died on the cross for our sins and presented a method to help us get rid ofthe sins…
    • For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. "For God did not send the son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. (John 3:16- 17) God made the…
  15. 2515.

    Christians should not observe the Sabbath on Sunday

    For

    • Okay...... you have conceded to my argument I take it ? Or have forgotten complelty? Saving up for one final round? Questions...
    • Okay... I guess I'll just wait for the rebuttal- feel free to place it on the bottom if want to.....

    Against

    • THE TARTAR DISCLAIMER :) for the purposes of this debate, both participants agree-or-at-least-pretend-to-agree that the bible is completely true.
  16. 2516.

    God's existence can be shown more likely than not

    For

    • as i said in the initial post... God is an "uncaused cause [....] beyond random mass and randomness [...] (as is all that was posited by most theologians anyway)" proving intelligent design would prove that God exists by virtue of proving the designer. it's pretty much the same…
    • i had before argued that God could not be proven.... here is my argument and some background concepts broken down into more basics.... http://www.debate.org... i actually have been needing to perhaps come to grips with the idea that perhaps God could be proven. some one pointed…

    Against

    • My opponent has forfeited their round, and my argument still stands, with an emphasis on question 2.
    • In order to fix this debate a little (I didn't have an understanding that those were Pro's opening arguments, since it was so stream-of -consciousness. I apologize.) and since Pro didn't establish any rules, I'd like to provide for the defining of God as intelligent design in…
  17. 2517.

    Belief in Christian heaven is unscientific and unreasonable

    For

    • My goal was not to show that something unscientific is definitively wrong, and I actually do not believe that it is the case. Furthermore, the statement that the belief in Heaven is unscientific was supported by evidence, which my opponent seemed to agree with (or perhaps chose…
    • *For clarity, when my opponent says that he rejects the additional restrictions that I placed on his argument, I will assume that he refers to 'I would like to add that this debate is not about the morality of a belief in Heaven, nor about the potential comfort that it can…

    Against

    • Preliminary Note: If my opponent and I seem to be arguing past each other, note that it is because I have rejected the two different definitions my opponent provided in Rounds 3 and 4 and am only using the definition posted in Round 2. I have already stated in the previous…
    • Thank you. Audience, I regret to inform you that this debate has not proceeded in an optimal fashion. Regretfully, we have degenerated into a semantic argument and my opponent has made this debate very difficult to finish in a proper manner by deliberately changing definitions…
  18. 2518.

    Deuterocanonical books should be included in the Bible

    For

    • The deuterocanonicals should not have been taken out by the protestants. The claim made is that they were not inspired however this is contrary to the truth. The deuterocanonicals were present in the first bible as decided at the Council of Rome and the African councils. Who…
    • Well I am saddened that my opponent has had to forfeit the debate. I hope we will get to debate again soon. It has been an honor to debate him.

    Against

    • :-)
    • I apologize to my opponent; but I must forfeit this debate. I did not realize that the date was only 1 day to argue, which is not enough time. Moreover, I am unfamiliar with Catholic theology. great debate!
  19. 2519.

    Christians cannot reasonably be assured of eternal salvation

    For

    • I'm probably meant to be wrapping up my arguments at this stage, but I'm afraid I will need to present new ones. My opponent has reiterated his points from John 6:38-40. I assert that this portion of Biblical scripture is talking about gaining salvation. Whilst on the surface…
    • Thank you Microsuck for your participation. Quite honestly you have one of the best avatars I have ever seen. In regards to the "reasonably" word in my topic; if permissible I would like to simply remove it entirely and update the debate to "Christians cannot be assured of…

    Against

    • 1) Hebrews 10:26-31The context goes much deeper than that. Let's look at parallel passages. Let's look at the entire passage (note, I am using ESV): For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the…
    • I agree with the new resolution as "Christians cannot be assured of Salvation." Thank you for your complement on my avatar, by the way.I agree with the definitions.John 6:38-40 Let's look at the context of the chapter as it is important for determining the correct…
  20. 2520.

    It is more likely that Jesus was God than not

    For

    • Both of us share equal b. o. p in showing our position is more probable than the other.
    • if Jesus fits in the denifition of God, then He is God, if not then He is a historical figure" - The problem with that statement is Jesus was a historical figure and He is God I also do not believe that the gospels are impractical. It is what God has called us to do. You used…

    Against

    • turning the other chick means allowing the aggressor to do more harm. i do not think, any sane person would do that. i am a sane person.so gospels are impractical. and what about loving your enemy ? have you ever done that?it is true that william kraig is a great scholer but it…
    • in this debate 2 things are relevant:1] the defination of god i.e. god= a being with supreme power in any form.2] if jesus fits in the defination of god or notall other things are irrelavant.if jesus fits in the defination of god, then he is the god, if not then he is a…
  21. 2521.

    The Bible contains fatal flaws

    For

    • I implor voters to vote not on their original beliefs, but on how well we debated. I ask my opponent to limit the last round to rebuttals only. There are two issues with these assertions. .. The gift of healing is not represented as a superpower which the believer can use at…
    • Thank you for your reply. I also thank you for your tremendous conduct.A simple Google search will reveal thousands of Churches that practice casting out of demons, speaking in tongues (both in a "prayer language" format, as well as speaking existing languages that are not…

    Against

    • RC1) Pro Dropped ContentionRC2) My oponent claims that because some healings fail, that all healings are false. My opponent has jumped to a faulty conclusion by way of faulty syllogism. Lets look at the syllogism that he uses and discuss the failure in logic.A) All healings…
    • RC1) Pro dropped the contention.RC2) My opponent asserts:"There are many other healing that have failed--many can be explained scientifically. Most protestant churches hold the view that the Spiritual gifts only lasted a short time. Furthermore, why don't they just go into…
  22. 2522.

    The following arguments for the existence of God are valid

    For

    • ok i would like to thank you for this debate so does god exist of course god exists he is the creator of the world matter of fact he created everything the reason that god exists is not by he said she said but rather do you believe god is real the fact on life is that everyone…

    Against

    • It's obvious who the winner is.
    • My opponent has forfeited his debate (unwittingly) and this round.
  23. 2523.

    Saved Christians can lose their salvation

    For

    • I agree with my opponent that everyone falls short and cannot uphold the law. Romans 3:23 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (NIV) "Simple.. live under the Law and surely die, or trust in Christ and receive eternal life." You say the bible has a…
    • I appreciate your enthusiasm! Thank you for accepting and I'm glad you will enjoy this debate as much as I will. Opening Statements 1. Mark 13:13 [Jesus said] "All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved." [NIV] This will be the pinnacle…

    Against

    • Since my opponent forfeit, I wil wrap this up quickly. Salvation is for those God chose to believe. If you die and are not saved, then it makes absolutley no sense to say that you were saved at some point in time; all the saved means, is saved in the end. God predestines his…
    • I'll begin this round by clarifying: I do not believe there is contradiction in the Bible, and that I merely pointed out, that without proper context, such passages can appear to be in contradiction; from that bad doctrine will follow.My opponent begins, by stating a scripture…
  24. 2524.

    Hell as eternal torment cannot be morally justified

    For

    • Thanks con. I don't think con has understood my argument for 1) which states that finite human beings shouldn't be punished for eternal torment. Whether the human soul is eternal or not was not my concern with this argument. My argument states that since human beings ony commit…
    • Thanks con. Hell as a place of eternal torment. It might be the Muslim or Christian interpretation of hell. This is not a hell of varying degree but the worst hell imaginable for everyone going to hell. 1) the punishment for a finite human being with a finite existence is…

    Against

    • Thanks Pro. As again I will provide counter-rebuttals and make assertions of my own in an attempt to justify an eternal torment in hell. "Whether the human soul is eternal or not was not my concern with this argument. My argument states that since human beings only commit a…
    • Thank you for your quick response! My counter argument will begin with rebuttals to your assertions. Rebuttal Number One: Pro said, "1) the punishment for a finite human being with a finite existence is eternal suffering. This isn't justice." Response: In this debate we are…
  25. 2525.

    Everyone should be Christian

    For

    • bro shut the fck up ur retarded bc jesus is the moral fabrics of this socitey and u need to accept that u moron ur prolly a jew
    • nah bro religion is to tell u how it all goes down and wat happens after u die and christianity is da way my bro u need to believe in jesus and vote 4 rick santorum next time

    Against

    • See I cant understand whats your point. But my point of concern is that almost all the religions are same. They have one goal. If you take the teachings of Jesus Christ himself, most of his teachings match with the teachings of my religion. You say that christianity is all…
    • How can you say that Christianity is always correct and other religions are wrong. As the con says that who do not follow Christianity will go to hell. My question is that is there really something called heaven and hell. According to me religions were only made to make the…
  26. 2526.

    The Bible is not the word of God

    For

    • ok check bart d. ehrman on youtube see his lecture or debate and come back... and i guess call of duty 4? ":D
    • god is always right... but bible isnt or u prove otherwise ^^ and u r playing call of duty ?:D

    Against

    • No actually another call of duty
    • The bible and it's scripture proves itself my brother and yes I am playing call of duty,(:
  27. 2527.

    Jesus was raised from the dead

    For

    • My opponent has put down quite a few arguments, all of which I believe to be fallacious. My opponent argues first that we cannot accept supernatural explanations of events as historical. This is all well and good, because it is not necessary in history to completely prove that…
    • My evidence for the ressurrection of Jesus can be found in two paces, the first is in the Bible. In the NT's eariest documents Jesus' cave tomb is said to be found empty, despite it being sealed off by a rock, a rock that was almost impossible to move back over the cave…

    Against

    • In his final comment, Pro states further evidence of that makes the resurrection of Jesus the most probable explanation as to why "Jesus disappeared from the tomb" is in the Gospels, the sincerity of the disciples belief, the epistles of Paul and that Josephus's Testimonium…
    • For my post I wish to highlight the nature of the historical explanations, why supernatural explanations are not considered academically, and why the presented historical documentation is insufficient to fulfill the extraordinary claim of resurrection.Why supernatural…
  28. 2528.

    Lack of evidence means people should assume God does not exist

    For

    • Extend all arguments.
    • Extend all above arguments!

    Against

    • For easy reading and typing, I will refer to PRO as "he" in the instances that "he or she" would generally be accepted. "All humans ought to assume that the Christian God does not exist, based on lack of evidence." This is the claim that my opponent has asserted. I will attempt…
    • I am obviously going to debate that the statement provided is false.
  29. 2529.

    The God of the Old Testament is not immoral

    For

    • No you keep bringing up the moral argument and I sam saying that this debate is not the debate for that. We can discuss the argument in a separate debate but in after I am done my rebuttal I will make a debate pertaining the moral argument. Make sure to look for a debate called…
    • I thought you'd never respond. I made this debate to address the apparent moral imperfections of the Gold of the Old Testament recorded in the Bible. If you would like to debate the moral argument than message me and I will set up the debate. Many Atheists are unfamiliar with…

    Against

    • . . . Do you know what moral means? Https://www. Dictionary. Com/browse/immoral The moral argument is a directly to related to the biblical god being immoral or not, The world immoral has moral right in it so I"m not sure why you"re so confused on that. God willingly drowned…
    • "This debate is about whether the God of the old testament is immoral or not! " Ever time I state why he"s immoral, You say if you would like to address the moral argument message me and we"ll debate that separately. . . You did it in your refute just now. . . I keep telling…
  30. 2530.

    The Christian God is more likely to exist than pagan gods

    For

    • According to the rules we both agreed, we can only forfeit one round. My opponent so far has forfeited two rounds. I hope everything is okay and I expect a sharp rebuttal in the next round.
    • O Introduction Now a certain person whom I won't mention directly (does anyone else feel like eating Kentucky fried chicken ?) has noticed that I have forfeited round two and so has my opponent. It is obligatory to forfeit one round in this debate as stated in round one "We…

    Against

    • My opponent has defined the terms. I will agree with the terms provided unless a problem arises with them. My opponent asks me to provide arguments for Zeus or other Pagan Gods. I humbly deny this request. I will, in this debate, go on the basis that there are NO arguments that…
    • In this final round I want to just briefly refute my opponents arguments in his last post, give a summary of my argument as well as refute his former arguments again. Am I claiming that Jesus never existed? No. I am simply saying that there is a possibility that Jesus never…
  31. 2531.

    The world is dominated by Christianity

    For

    • My opponent forfeited the previous round because they did not post their argument within the allotted time, therefore I have nothing to write.
    • Wheter we like it or not, the world is chirstian dominated. 33% of the world's population is christian. Also, christian religous holidays, especially christmas, are celebrated in countries that aren't christian dominated (like India) and by people of different religions,…

    Against

    • hey the world isnt christian dominated. i am a christian but i think most of the people just say they are christian. sorry bout the other roun i spaced out. but ne ways i agree with part of what you say about the population and what not but i think tht alot of them just say…
  32. 2532.

    God's existence is factually impossible

    For

    • no..
    • fact=personal memory

    Against

    • Yes!
    • Many people have experienced God's existence in their lives in a powerful way and can tell you all about it from personal memory. People have shared these experiences in the Bible, online and verbally. If fact=personal memory as per your definition, how can you claim that there…
  33. 2533.

    Most major religions worship the same God

    For

    • My opponent can't even be bothered to write something against my original statement. I have refuted not one, but every single one of his false and teenage angst riddled statements, and concluded this rebuttal with an expansion of my original statement, which he has yet to even…
    • "First of all, anyone from a revealed religion has been brainwashed" I believe you are mistaking acceptance of dogma for appreciation. I certainly do not believe in dogma, in fact I believe religion is something that we can take valuable information from - not base our lives…

    Against

    • My opponent is yet to prove the resolution, insted he has argued against a statement that I made.
    • First of all, anyone from a revealed religion has been brainwashed- what do you call it when you take someone and indoctrinate them as a little aby into a belief that he would never have otherwise accepted?Second of all, "God" was originally used as essentially a Big Borther…
  34. 2534.

    Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God

    For

    • I have the highest respects for my opponent for this debate on the legitimacy of Joseph Smith being a prophet. I would first like to state that these are not failed prophecies, but prophecies that may have not fulfilled their meanings. It would be the same as the book of…
    • So I will keep the same numbering order as they where presented in previous arguments. 1)"My opponent relied on possibilities as though the prophecy isn't clear. Such words as may, possible, may (again), have been a reincarnated Jesus do not hold water in this prophecy. If you…

    Against

    • LDS claims that their founder, Joseph Smith, was a prophet called by God to restore a church that had fallen during the 1st century. It is a claim that I challenge today in this debate as I believe that He was not a prophet. Any challenger?
    • I commend my opponent for suggesting his attempt to show that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. However I am frustrating, my opponent has not offered any arguments for his side to show the legitimacy of Joseph Smith as a prophet. He has only spend all his rounds relying on the…
  35. 2535.

    The Catholic Church has been a force for good in the world

    For

    • I accept the terms of this debate.
    • I think we both learned a lot about each other. BROKEN RULES I would like to begin my closing statement by pointing out how my opponent broke the rules of this debate with his last argument. Rules he insisted on in round one. The rules for round five were as follows: Round 5:…

    Against

    • If one is going to defend the proposition then one has to begin by making a great deal of heartfelt apologies and request for contrition. The crimes perpetrated by the Catholic Church against humanity and the offenses against the free intelligence must be pardoned for. In the…
    • Round 1. Acceptance of debate terms Round 2-4: Rebuttals Round 5: Closing statement. No rebuttals and no new arguments. For this introductory round I will present my position and the necessary terms for this debate. I wont offer any arguments as to why Catholic Church is not a…
  36. 2536.

    Religion does more harm than good

    For

    • I will first clarify a few of my points and then add new ones. Ok. I certainly approve of the general condemnation for religious extremists, which I frequently see in media. I note this is not a position sustained by principle, but by pragmatic necessity. Not meritorious. The…
    • Any social construct that promotes and exalts willful ignorance puts its members in a reproductive disadvantage to the rest of humanity. Mankind's want for religion should have faded out of our cultures a long time ago with the rise of modern science and the scientific…

    Against

    • It is disappointing that my opponent didn't post a reply nor did he engage any of my points as I tried to engage all of his points. The fact still stands that his main point about Religion being bad because it impedes progress is nullified unless he can prove that progress is a…
    • First off, you give a long rant about extremism by giving specific examples of religious extremism, and then you go on in your next paragraph and say that examples are meaningless in this type of debate; therefore your first paragraph is moot. "Faith allows belief in divine…
  37. 2537.

    The Catholic Church has never contradicted itself

    For

    • you said you clearly proved it ocntradicted itself with the first post, which i showed you clearly did not do so your claim of being clear here has less credibility. you cannot show what people in the church believe or think... you have to show what the pope taught as a matter…
    • the main point is that you haven't shown that the CC teaches the bible is infallible. in fact, there's some sentiment out there that it might not be, and only is inspired generally. the second point is that your examles are weak. i'd tend to believe that the bible has…

    Against

    • Again my opponent is attempting to derail my argument through semantics and interpretation. The members of the CC do not have the luxury of Interpretation because the Pope is always right. I will in this my final round use indisputable Historical fact. Fact is not up to…
    • While I do not have an "Axe to grind" your point is noted however I must state that this debate is in fact weather the church has contradicted itself in its long history. If at any point it has taught the bible as literal or completely valid then it has contradicted itself. We…
  38. 2538.

    The faith required for Christian salvation is unclear

    For

    • con makes an issue out of me not stating a type of christianity. i don't need to as we are examining the formulas people give for their own worth. i argue what i see, you argue what you see. i also point out, con hasn't shown why believing he is the Son of God, or that he died…
    • so here we have if folks? the official list of things that must be believed, through milleniums of fighting and wars by christians..... it has been officially listed on debate.org during the month of June, 2014? notice the sarcasm. so you are asserting that someone would not be…

    Against

    • I would like to state for the conclusion of this debate, that I think Pro has completely misconstrued what he is asking in his own question. The question proposed was: "The threshold of faith required for Christians to be saved is unclear" What this means is that the onus was…
    • Again, we have the problem that you have not addressed which is crucial to the argument: to which branch of Christianity are you referring? Since you have not specified, I am going to continue to assume you mean the original and uncorrupted version of Christianity. I will give…
  39. 2539.

    The Judeo-Christian God is as likely to exist as any other god

    For

    • I challenge KRFournier to a debate regarding how the existence of "Yahweh" is just as likely as the existence of "Zeus", "Osiris" or any other God.
    • My opponent has dodged the question. What he must disprove to win the debate is not that the Judeo-Christian God is more likely to exist than the 2 gods I used as examples, but instead disprove that "The Judeo-Christian God's Existence Is Just As Likely As Any Other God's…

    Against

    • My opponent has forfeited his final round, thus relegating all our efforts into the black hole of unfinished debates. For those that do stumble upon this debate, note that my arguments remain unexamined by my opponent. Furthermore, he never offered evidence for his own…
    • Given my opening round, I think it's clear I made an attempt to negate the resolution within practical constraints. Indeed, the resolution states I must show God is more likely that all others in the whole of history. However, I had hoped my opponent would see the impossibility…
  40. 2540.

    Biblical accounts show God is not loving

    For

    • For this debate, I will assume that God exists and that the bible is accurate and literal in its depictions of events, but not in its claims about the nature of God. Christians like my opponent continually make statements about the nature of God as loving with the assumption…

    Against

    • NOW we shall truly see WHO is really objective in their voting! Can anyone is ALL conscience vote for someone who forfeited two rounds?
    • I fully understand that my argument in round one was DEVASTATING but I DO think you might have shown me the common courtesy of showing up! AND I requested a short apology and honourable withdraw.
  41. 2541.

    The Bible does not contain contradictions

    For

    • 1Who was the father of Joseph? "And Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ."-Matthew 1:16 (all bible verses will be the King James version.) Jacob is Joseph's father,the genealogy in the book of Matthew goes through Solomon,and…
    • I haven't had time to post my rebuttal yet,so i will next time.

    Against

    • Extend
    • Thanks for this debate. My opponent failed to provide any definitions so I will do so. I. DefinitionsA. The Bible: The 66 books of the Protestant Bible (not including apocrypha). B. Contradiction: a logical incompatibility between two or more propositions (Wikipedia). With…
  42. 2542.

    Religion benefits modern society

    For

    • rel-i-gion: noun: A set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of…

    Against

    • My opponent has forfieted again. The only thing he has offered in the debate is the definition of the word "religion" and a one sentence argument that is mainly a restatement of the resolution.
    • My opponent has forfeited the round. Since silence is consent, my opponent has conceded all of my arguments are true unless he offers a rebuttal in the next round. All arguments are extended.
  43. 2543.

    The God described in the Bible does not exist today

    For

    • For my side of the debate, I will be providing sources in the Bible where god literally speaks auditorily to people. The reason I am citing these sources is to show that if god can speak to these people, he can speak to us today in situations that can be documented by video…
    • If a conscious entity existed that was all-powerful and wanted to have a relationship with everyone, his first goal would be to make himself detectable so that the humans he wanted to have a relationship with would know that he exists so he could have a relationship with them.…

    Against

    • Till next round
    • First off that is a very good argument, and thank you for bringing this up. The bible does state accounts off people having conversations with God, but none have ever seen him, it may not be stated in the bible itself, but logically God chooses people he made known his presence…
  44. 2544.

    Mother Teresa was either a lying, evil thief or a deluded one

    For

    • Thanks for the reply, however late it came. My opponent has site a single wikipedia database that chooses to word this woman's actions in a positive light. since he has chosen to only give us a single point, it will be all the more simple for me to dismantle. He says that,…
    • For me, there are only two possible categories that we can place this woman. Either a deluded woman, that was tricked into carrying out the most horrendous acts against the worlds poor by an old, sinister, predator-protecting virgin. Or that she intentionally did the corrupt…

    Against

    • I'm sorry, but I refuse to debate people who insult or personally attack me. Especially my intelligence. From your debate history, it seems you've used personally attacks often in your other debates. I am boycotting this debate and forfeiting all future rounds. Thank you.
    • According to Wikipedia,"Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity, a Roman Catholic religious congregation, which in 2012 consisted of over 4,500 sisters and is active in 133 countries. They run hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; soup…
  45. 2545.

    The Bible has been significantly corrupted over time

    For

    • I'm very sorry, but I will be away for awhile and can't post. I must forfeit the debate because I will be unable to participate due to lack of time. Sorry for the inconvenience.
    • I believe that the Bible is corrupt for reasons that will be discussed in this debate. Your job is to defend the Bible as you see fit. I wish you good luck!

    Against

    • ok
    • The bible has not been corrupted. We can see the truth in it if we look. Noah's ark has been found. Source: (https://answersingenesis.org...). Even the Qu'ran says it isn't:" Rejected were the messengers before thee: with patience and constancy they bore their rejection and…
  46. 2546.

    Christians should reject the history of stoning in their faith

    For

    • i guess i can concede that i should have phrased the title better. but that aside, the point is that the christian should acknowledge that it was never God who ordered the stuff to begin with. if that means the bible isn't infallible, so be it. even though i made these points…
    • con seems to be essentially saying that Christians are not jews, so whether they should reject stoning isn't an issue for them, given they have been against it since Jesus? it is an issue for them. even con says Christians "no longer live under the laws of Moses". if he…

    Against

    • It appears that I have mistaken the argument. I would like to apologize for not having the debate go as intended, and I appreciate your concession of the resolution. It seems as if the debate was a whole misunderstanding. I was arguing against the resolution while Pro was…
    • To begin I would like clarify something. Pro believes that Christians should reject stoning. I am arguing that they already have rejected it, as they don't agree with stoning, nor do the practice it. Let me elaborate. Rebuttals: Pro states: "if he acwknowleeges that it was once…
  47. 2547.

    The Buddha was an atheist

    For

    • Con confirms Pro's argument by telling us that Buddhism does not hold such teachings of a Supreme God like Christianity or Islam. And Con is right to say that the Buddha was silent on such topics however, we can conclude that monotheism was indeed foreign to the Buddha and His…
    • Before I continue, I would like to state to the voters that at heart and mind, I do NOT believe the Buddha was an atheist. I believe that the Buddha was a Messenger of God and Buddhism is a monotheistic Religion, despite the belief of some individuals. I simply accepted this…

    Against

    • Extend all arguments.
    • As I am short on time, my rebuttals this round will be comparatively shorter. "I agree that both is impossible to overcome however, this again confirms my point on the Atheistic stance of the Buddha, how He fails to touch on such a subject and then basically tells us that…
  48. 2548.

    Burning holy books should be banned

    For

    • It is a declaration of intent to attack someone.
    • First books then people

    Against

    • The burning of holy books is a freedom of expression which should not be restricted.
    • It removes incentive for religious people to grow up..
  49. 2549.

    Atheism relies on mythological assumptions

    For

    • Con: "My atheism cannot be used as an argument because even if I am an atheist, and let's say I do believe in mythical concepts, doesn't mean all atheists believe in mythical concepts - which is my opponent's claim." I didn't say all Atheists believe in mythological concepts.…
    • Mythological The evidence says that death exists, therefore Jedd believes in death. The evidence says that chaos exists. Therefore Jedd believes Chaos exists. The evidence says that Pluto and Jupiter exist. I will now prove they exist. I will also prove that they are parts of…

    Against

    • Pro:"All I need is to prove an atheist believes in mythological concepts."False. My opponent's presupposition was "Atheists believe in mythological concepts". Grammatically, this implies "all atheists" since he put "Atheists" in plural. If his presupposition was "An atheist…
    • However I don't see any argument proving atheists believe in mythical concepts. My opponent's main burden of proof hasn't been addressed. My atheism cannot be used as an argument because even if I am an atheist, and let's say I do believe in mythical concepts, doesn't mean all…
  50. 2550.

    Religious arguments against homosexuality are unjustified

    For

    • Other Christians interpret the passage differently. They note that the persons involves in the orgy were former Christians and were heterosexual. Romans 1 condemns them because they went against their nature their heterosexual orientation and engaged in same gender sexual…
    • Alright with respect to the bible I have read it start to finish now the only book that has any mention of homosexuals is Leviticus 20-21 "If anyone curses his father or mother, he must be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother, and his blood will be on his own…

    Against

    • The resolution is: For Religious people there is no Religious argument against homosexuality. I would like to remind the readers that Pro has the full burden of showing there is no argument against homosexuality for the religious. I am Christian and will use the King James…
    • I accept. I await your case.

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.