Religion Debate Topics — page 49
3,675 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 2401.
The God of the Bible created the world
For
- Yes, we are having a debate which you already lost by admitting you know nothing and avoiding my Qs. You have proved nothing, but made more claims. And then you dodged my Qs rather than expose your ignorance. You have provided no reason to reject Scripture.
- If you don't know anything to 100% certainty, you do not know anything. And that really ends the debate, because you could be wrong about everything you claim is true. With you having nothing but uncertainty and me certainty, I go with God and His Word. Tell us how uranium…
Against
- we are having a debate, so you are suppose to give reasons to support your opinion regarding the motion. Why did you create an account here if you will not debate. The difference between me just believing in these scientific processes is that they can make a prediction and…
- Of course no one can KNOW anything to 100% certainty without looking dumb. I get that. But I am as near certain as you can be with such a topic that. I'm not looking to prove or disprove anything, you cannot prove God exists the same way I cannot disprove his existence. Through…
- 2402.
Dinosaurs are compatible with a literal reading of the Bible
For
- You said Current scientific evidence points to evolution creating both dinosaurs and humans, over the course of the history of the Universe - beginning 13+ Billion years ago, to the history of our planet - roughly 4.5 billion years ago via radiometric dating of meteorites. The…
- Hi Thoht thank you for debating me and putting your impressive record on the line the 1-0 truly astonishing. You said 2. The Bible can be referred to showing that Dinosaurs and Man lived together. My response Firstly to everyone reading I don't believe that there is proof for…
Against
- 1. Dr. Steven Austin's claims et cetera. Your link does not go to what you speak of, so I had to dig a little bit on my own. What you're telling me is that the vast majority of scientists, except for the creationists, accept radiometric dating as accurate within a certain…
- Very well. You say that your beliefs are not proven. Excellent. You say "the evidence" points to the topic we're discussing being true. That is most certainly false. Current scientific evidence points to evolution creating both dinosaurs and humans, over the course of the…
- 2403.
The Judeo-Christian God is a good foundation for moral values and duties
For
- Okay, let us begin. I would like to point out to voters that both of us are assuming the Judeo-Christian God exists in this debate. My first point about why Yahweh is a good arbiter of morality and ethics concerns the grounding of moraity. The Judeo-Christian God, as an…
- In this debate, I will be arguing that the God of the Holy Bible provides a valid and complete foundation for moral values and duties.
Against
- Welp, I guess that's it for this round. I have to say I'm pretty disappointed with my opponent, since this was my first debate. If anyone else would like to pick up on this debate with me, please message me~I thank my opponent anyway for letting me present my arguments. Peace,…
- I have no other arguments to bring forth. I'll see if my opponent brings any rebuttals to my arguments in the next round.
- 2404.
Religion is becoming more like a business
For
- People are not lazy, they have jobs to do and don't have time to waste on religious prayers. Plus, why weren't the books' free version uploaded online, and these holy books cheaper than most? Instead, these books have a price much higher than novels that are lengthier and make…
- This debate is not about the existence of God, but the fact that religion is being used as a business strategy. Here are some products that sell due to religion- 1. Religious books- The Bible, the Quran and the Bhagavad Gita have achieved record sales throughout the world. If…
Against
- excuse me my dear friend you said i have not rebutted your arguements , ok then I have to rebutt again in this round and with that conclusions too. In this round you have said Peoples are not lazy ? Right ! and they have jobs to do. you dont think that they got jobs because of…
- You have mentioned in your point 1 that the record selling of religious books such as Bible, Bhagavd gita , Quran, and many other books ? They are profitably sold because for the people , as they are lethargically behaving nowadays and feel very lazy to go to the religious…
- 2405.
A monotheistic, at least deistic God probably exists
For
- Okay, so very few Physicists would agree in the belief of a computer simulated universe. Also If the aliens were the "God" than they are supernatural because they transcend OUR naturality. Also, Advanced Technology would distinguishable from Magic because technology is…
- Let us start with the Cosmological argument: P1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause. P2. The Universe began to exist. P3/C. Therefore the Universe has a cause Is the first premise true? Well, let's take a look. Believing that something can pop into existence without a cause…
Against
- Let me begin with some definitions and ground rules. I will use Richard Dawkins God hypothesis to fully clarify what we are arguing about. p.52 paragraph 1 Richard Dawkins the God Delusion. "There exists a superhuman, supernatural intelligence who deliberately designed and…
- Round five conclusionOutlineI. IntroII. BodyIII. ConclusionIV. SourcesI. IntroFirst, I am going to keep this brief out of fairness. My opponent will not get a chance to respond since this is the second half of the last round. I want to thank my opponent for creating this debate…
- 2406.
Christianity has done more harm than good
For
- Thank you, that was a very good argument. I do apologize for my vagueness I will try to be more specific. Yes, obviously the "Christians" who have killed people were not true Christians, but statistically Christians have killed more people than any other Religion/peoples. You…
- It is OK to post your arguments in comments. Christianity has killed the most amount of people in the world. It has started wars. How can this be good? The Old Testament is riddled with horrible ideals and orders given by god. The Old Testament says slavery is OK, it says to…
Against
- The first part of your argument, about how Christianity started wars and has killed "the most amount of people in the world" To start, the religion of Christianity had never started a war. The people practicing it did. This may sound like semantics, but there is a very real…
- I disagree. I assume arguments start in round two, so that's when I will say mine. I want pro to know that I will be at camp with no internet or cell phones next week, so if I miss a round I will post it in the comments when I get back.
- 2407.
Eternal hell is a just punishment for unbelief
For
- C1: Status and MoralityI. I would first like to admit that I made a mistake in the first contention of my opening statement. I agree with Con's moral principle that every person has equal moral worth. My premise is that the severity of a sin is based on the status of the being…
- C1: Status and Morality [1]My first contention focuses on the severity of sin based on the status of the being it is being directed towards. This falls in line with general moral intuitions. It would be considered much more immoral to harm or kill a highly respected member of…
Against
- C1: Status and MoralityI. Pro drops one point and urges us to focus on his other allegedly more sturdy point; I will do so.II. Pro seems to misunderstand the purpose of my analogy; it was a point to illustrate a reductio ad absurdum - that is, a reduction to an absurdity by…
- C1: Status and MoralityIt seems to me, in fact, that Pro's contention is radically counter-intuitive despite Pro's protestations otherwise.C1.1) I'm not sure by whom it would be considered "much more immoral to harm or kill a highly respected member of society rather than the…
- 2408.
The Bible's teachings are not credible
For
- Well, here is logic in general: A: Your own personal logic and how you define it is irrelevant. Logic is logic. B: Correct, science has not figured out how to bring a person back to life. That doesn't mean that God exists based on that factor. C: For your point "B" please refer…
- If the Bible is fake, then that means what you just presented me with would not be proof. To atheists, the Bible isn't proof for God. So arguing that the Bible is true using the Bible is ridiculous, as is arguing God's existence and any prophecies using the Bible. You see how…
Against
- Unfortunately Pro is stating that bible is ridiculous but yet cannot understand simple logic and thus prove any good rebuttals.I am going to explain my argument once again in a detailedmanner for Pro to understand so he can find an answer for himself or for another debate.1)…
- Well here is my logic :A= Science nowaday know for sure that bringing a human back to life when his brain is clinicaly dead is impossible.B= The bible states that if Jesus is resurrected the entire bible system is true, according to the bible Jesus rose from the dead so the…
- 2409.
Religion has caused more bloodshed than any other cause
For
- However, there are a lot of other things involving bloodshed that are not wars. Point One: WarsAmerican RevolutionThe revolution was caused by a conflict between the Anglican Church and the Colonists (History. com)The CrusadesIn the Crusades, invaders fought over a "holy" city…
- In defense of: TerrorismYes, terrorism is a huge difference, as stated by Con. Not much to refute hereIn defense of: genocideCon has stated that history.com is not a reliable source. however, Con uses wikipedia as a sourc so therefore it is unreliable and that refutation cannot…
Against
- Point one wars Do you now how many wars event is mentioned in encyclopaedism of war? More than 1300 war event....even you are right about American evolution and the crusader....is will not make the amount of war caused by religion exceed 10% of it... Point two terrorism Okay…
- According to the Encyclopedia of War, out of all known/recorded historical conflicts, only about 7% had religion as their primary cause, and of that percentage. So if anyone think that religion is the root of evil they already been brainwashed
- 2410.
Throughout history, religion has done more harm than good
For
- Pro is arguing that religion has done more harm than good, while Con is arguing the flip side, that religion has done more good than harm.
Against
- We're done.
- Again, nothing to say.
- 2411.
Christianity, including all of its denominations, can fairly be described as a cult
For
- Definiton of cult: http://dictionary.reference.com...Definition of Christianity: http://dictionary.reference.com...Defition of denomination: Google "definition of denominations"There is no official method of recognition of the denomination, so any religion that fits the…
- -------I will be taking the position that Christianity, including all its denominations, are cults. Con will take the position of saying that at least one denomination of Christianity, or Christianity as a whole, is not a cult. Definitions:Cult: a particular system of religious…
Against
- teste tets test
- 2412.
Mormonism should not be considered Christian
For
- My hope is that by this debate we will learn from each other. In the Mormon religion it is believed that god was once a man and was granted god hood by a different god and that god before and so on and so forth in an infinite succession of god hood. This is wrong. It is a sin…
- In this debate I will be arguing against The church of latter day saints claim to be a Christian church.
Against
- First off, I would like to say that this debate is whether or not mormons are christians, not doctrinal differences.One denomination of Christianity cannot set the standards for the rest to follow. Merriam-webster.com states that a christian is, 1:one who professes belief in…
- I accept.
- 2413.
The God hypothesis lacks scientific support
For
- Because we have both written a lot, I have decided to summarize our arguments. From what I have read, your argument is as follows: A god hypothesis can exist because god can be defined. This definition does not have to be mutually accepted. From this definition we can…
- "What god "does", or rather, any testable qualities he may have, is the result of what he is." True, so what is god? "... a "hypothesis" is simply a guess, and that the nature of the thing in question need not be known at the outset." A phenomena is not defined by its nature.…
Against
- As this is the last round, I will attempt to restate my position in light of his blackhole/god example. 1. Defining God in relation to other knowledge- Supernatural being should suffice here. We know what natural things are (those objects subject to the laws of physics) and we…
- Unfortunately my opponent still seems confused by the idea of a hypothesis. I am having trouble following his argument. "so what is god?" Whatever we are looking for that we label god because: "... a "hypothesis" is simply a guess, and that the nature of the thing in question…
- 2414.
The Bible is not the word of God
For
- Arguments extended.
- Unfortunately, my opponent did not prove or back up ANYTHING. My opponent first contends that the Bible is the Word of God and is the only revelation. This is the purpose of the debate. I would like to see some sources that say that no-one successfully refuted the Bible. Many…
Against
- forfeit
- I forfeit.
- 2415.
Religion is detrimental to human development
For
- This is the first debate I have participated in I would like to set some rules before we proceed 1. we will only focus on the effects of religion and not on the causes 2. we will focus on if the effects are more detrimental to society and humanity as a whole or if they are more…
Against
- You have forfeited in two continuously rounds. Thank you and have a nice day! In conclusion, religion is NOT detrimental to human development.
- Since Pro forfeited, I guess I won round 2.
- 2416.
Jesus died for the sins of humanity
For
- I accept and look forward to an intelligent debate with my opponent.
Against
- I will like to debate this topic with a very intellectual opponent The opponent must analyse the positive effect on mankind The opponent must explain why God had to wait for 6000years before sending jesus to die for our sins. The opponenent should be able to tell us why a man…
- Since the pro is forfeiting his round,I will buttress my points by making use of two biblical verses to back up my claim that jesus died not for the sins of humanity. 1.Ezekiel 18:20 New International Version (NIV) 20 The one who sins is the one who will die.The child will not…
- 2417.
Religion causes more harm than good in society
For
- Although terrorism is recent. It would still better without it in society. Without people dedicating and wasting there lives, dedicating them selves to a non-existing entity. Humanity cannot progress if we keep these religious constraints. For example, in Islamic culture, women…
- In 1095, Pope Urban II said that God had come to him, and said that the Bible had a mistake and that it was okay to kill, just not to kill other Christians. Whereas the Bible said that killing anyone was wrong. "Whatsoever ye do unto the least of these, my brethren, ye do it…
Against
- While your argument holds mostly grammatical errors and opinions, it also seems to hold a certain prejudice against religion, specifically Islamic religion. But onto my argument. You claim that "multiple 'religious' leaders around the world" use religion as a justification for…
- I accept your argument thusly: Religion has been around for somewhere in the ballpark of 40,000 years, whereas terrorism is really understood by scholars to have started around the 1st century with Jewish extremists attempting to rebel against Roman rule and control. Granted…
- 2418.
The pope is not the final authority of the Church
For
- I agree with my oppenent that there can be different interpretations of church father quotes. However, i attempted to not be bias, thats why most if not all of my quotes were from that of the roman fathers. I can see there being different interpretations on all of the quotes i…
- I will state again that the orthodox church does recognize a role that was given to better, but what authority does role give him? The patristic is that no Father of the Church has seen, in the primacy of peter, any title of jurisdiction or absolute authority in church…
Against
- I must admit that I ran out of characters to refute the citation and interpretation of my opponent on St. Gregory. Let me provide (as I did with St. Augustine and how I said earlier) a different interpretation and view of St. Gregory's personal view of Papal control. St.…
- Splendid. My opponent seems to ensue on a "Church Fathers" War, which I would rather not take. So to avoid it, I will detract myself from employing anymore of the Church Fathers. It is a fact that the Church Fathers disputed amongst each other on countless issues, not just…
- 2419.
God is irrelevant in modern life
For
- Lots to unravel here. First of all, there isn't overwhelming evidence for the Genesis flood. The only thing closest to it are melting ice caps over 20,000 years ago. The most basic evidence would be a massive worldwide account of fossils on higher terrains- animals running from…
- I saw your comments and thought I'd offer you a challenge. You read my arguments from the last debate so I'll let you have the first strike.
Against
- Sorry this is kind of late. I haven't had much free time since school started. Scientific Arguments 1. You say there is little evidence for a world-wide flood, however there are several things I could point to, such as the fossils of sea creatures in the Himalayas and other…
- Wow, first debate, I'm not sure where to start. Let's start with the argument. Foucault has stipulated that God is irrelevant in today's life. I am going to argue that God is indeed relevant. Relevance is a tricky issue as relevancy is judged by individuals. We see the same…
- 2420.
The God of the Bible exists
For
- I am arguing for the Christian God from a reformed view. I am not a Jehovah's Witness or a Mormon or some "just believe off a whim" Christian. The Christian God exists and the Christian worldview is the only worldview that makes sense out morality, logic, truth, human…
Against
- The lack of necessity for a God negates the need for one. The resolution is Resolution - The God of the Bible exists and everybody knows Possibility - The fact or state of being possible. Possible - Capable of happening, existing, or being true without contradicting proven…
- giving my adversary a chance to re spawn
- 2421.
The Christian God is unconditionally loving
For
- "But god commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" The lord showed us love while we were sinners, and died while we were sinners. We sin, and god died to show us our unconditional love. Now think of the world as your children. you…
- I state my argument with a simple question. If you had a child born, then he was put in prison for life, do you not love him anymore? Do you say "My child did something wrong and went to life in prison so I don't love him no more!" God is no exception. He loves you, even if you…
Against
- I argue that if the Christian god does exist, his love is not unconditional, that is to say that he will love anyone and everyone, but with conditions. Round 1 is acceptance (also inform us about your beleifs on religion and god) No New arguments in the final round. Don't argue…
- Due to forfeit, all points to Con. God's love is not unconditional if he exists in the Christian sense.
- 2422.
Fundamentalism is a greater threat to belief in God than atheism
For
- My opponent has forfeited this round.I am new here i am not sure of what to do.Please help me out in the comments.
- However, not that the title of the argument is not 'religion' but belief in God. And my original argument still stands. 1. Fundamentalists across the globe invariably insist that their way is the only way. They also assert that their scripture is perfect word of God,ignoring…
Against
- I apologise for I have not been logged into debate.org, I was busy with schoolwork and have justifiably forfeited that round. The debate continues unabated (pun intended) until the end, thank you sir. 1. The main flaw with your first argument is the assumption or maybe even the…
- How fundamentalists perceive the world they inhabit, without question, affects they way they interact with it. I do not however view fundamentalism as an imminent threat to a belief in a higher power. If I may direct you to the Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org..., it's…
- 2423.
God is more likely than not to exist
For
- I shall continue my opening arguments as in accords with the rules then I shall go into my rebuttals against my opponent's Zero Net argument. Contention 3: TA Arguement Here we can observe Saint Thomas Aquinas's theory on teleologic which is the ultamate causes of objects or…
- Contention 1: The Modal Ontological Argument Dating as far back as the Saint Anslem, as this argument has been honnored by philosphers on every side of the spectrum. I shall be definding the version of this argument that was made popular by Alvin Plantinga. His model uses the…
Against
- I will respond to all of Pro's logical arguments, but according to the rules, this round's focus is the continuation of my argument...I'm permitted to rebuttal, which I choose to do. The definition for god in this debate is "the intelligent creator of the universe." However, if…
- I reject the claim that god exists, because no god has been demonstrated physically, contingent on physical reality, or logically. Since there has been no demonstration for god, the demonstration cannot be replicated or used to make accurate predictions about the nature of this…
- 2424.
The Bible is sexist
For
- And now, my final argument! Don't worry, your last round was good, but you did put more detail and effort into this one, which I am grateful for. This round, I'm going to give a rebuttal, then a conclusion, which is a quick summary of how the debate went from my perspective,…
- Thank you for your counter-argument, Con. I've read it, and you have said nothing offensive or rude, so don't worry about that. Your response to my Genesis argument was very thoughtful, but there are some flaws in your logic. You say that this isn't sexist because God gave an…
Against
- Thank you so much for this debate- it was wonderful to be doing this with you, and I'm sad to see it finished. I'm hoping we can do more debates together afterward. I've never seen what you've done in terms of a conclusion, but I'd like to thank you for your honest points and…
- Hello again! Thank you so much for your thoughtful response and insights. I'll do my best to respond to them now. I'm sorry if my answer last time was a little rushed- I was running short on time and didn't elaborate on a lot of my points, leading to some confusion. I hope this…
- 2425.
Eternal security is a true Christian doctrine
For
- The first thing that we need to look at is the process which is known as hermeneutics. This is how the bible should be studied. Most people read the bible and take what they want from it, but this is actually really inaccurate and not the way in which it should be studied.…
- I accept
Against
- Let us look more closely at some of the pillars my opponent posted [[(1) John 10:27-29.]] My sheep hear my voice and I know them, and they follow me. The word follow is in the present tense not in the past tense of someone who once followed and left the fold, but of someone who…
- Eternal security is the doctrine that one can't lose their salvation even if you kill someone or kill yourself because you weren't good enough to be saved in the first place. It is a doctrine that supports worldly living and that one can't help but sin, and that one can't lose…
- 2426.
Christianity and evolution can coexist
For
- Despite popular belief, Christians can in fact believe in evolution, or at least parts of the evolutionary theory. Why must one believe solely in one theory?
Against
- VotingImpotant Note:Please vote on what the debate is based on, and not your own personal opinions. Thank You!Once again, Pro is unable to provide counter arguements to keep thier arguments in the debate. Thus, my arguements are the only things that stand. Thus, only a Con vote…
- As the Pro is unable to refute my evidence, I see no reason to which why Pro should win this debate. He leaves a case of two sentences. As for Con, me, has been able to counter all of Pro's case completely. He leaves round 2 empty handed, so I have many strong arguements still…
- 2427.
The Bible teaches that Scripture alone is the final authority
For
- Round III for Sola Scriptura IS taught in the Scriptures. To (again) define this oft debated term, Sola Scriptura means the simple fact that the Bible (the Scriptura) is the sole authority for Christian teaching. The following is an outline for Round 3: I. The Book of Hebrews…
- Sola Scriptura IS taught in the Scriptures. Again, to define this term, Sola Scriptura is the idea that the Bible (Scriptura) is the sole (Sola) authority for Christian teaching. The following is an outline for this round: I. Paul proves Sola Scriptura II. Jewish Converts prove…
Against
- The Bible does not teach that Scripture is the sole rule of faith for the Christian and is thus self-referentially absurd.
- As far as the claim that Paul proves sola scriptura, the fact that Paul appeals to Scripture does not mean that he believed it was the only authority to which one could appeal. In fact, Paul appealed to lesser authorities, such as pagan poets and philosophers (see Acts 17), so…
- 2428.
God is a human invention
For
- It is clear that religion is a human invention but most believers consider that their deities truly exist. I contend that the only thing that exists is their belief, not their deities: 1. Belief is the only 'proof' believers have. 2. All 'arguments' are question-begging -…
- The Comsological Argument (CA) is invalid for my very claims: ------Depends on Belief------ - CA doesn't work because it could apply equally to the FSM. Therefore it is requires an initial belief in God for it to be effective. - If you replace either the conclusion (god) with…
Against
- Phooey.
- www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Dx5DyBkYKqnM
- 2429.
Religion is generally beneficial for society
For
- Thanks. Con opens by disagreeing with my proposed definition of religion; however, my definition comes from the dictionary. Con cannot change the dictionary definition of a word to suit his position. Though I agree with Con that atheism is generally considered to be the absence…
- Religion -- A set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe Society -- An organized group of persons associated together for religious, political, cultural... or other purposes 1. Foundation of Society As the very definition of "society" implies,…
Against
- I'll start by going over my opponents arguments and move on to my own case. First on definitions. I disagree with my opponents definition as this definition would include atheists into the religion category. This is most certainly not the case. Atheists base beliefs and…
- Hello LD style debate
- 2430.
The Quran does not promote modern violence
For
- Topic: The Quran is Misinterpreted and Does Not Promote Modern Violence Definitions: Quran: the Islamic sacred book, believed to be the word of God as dictated to Muhammad by the archangel Gabriel and written down in Arabic. Misinterpreted: interpret (something or someone)…
- "My referance to Qur'an 9:5 came from the Sakir translation" Sakir is not a translation. I am assuming you mean "Shakir". Even so, the Shakir translation does not follow. This is the Shakir translation: "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters…
Against
- My opponents defense of Qur'an 9:29 comes from an Islaimic website which has a clear bias and is attempting to rewrite history. Muhammad started every war he fought- those Jews did not betray him, he propagated the lie that they did so he could attack them when they didn't…
- My referance to Qur'an 9:5 came from the Sakir translation, and this one is Sahih International, Qur'an 9:29:"Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the…
- 2431.
The Bible teaches that women are less important than men
For
- In it, I intend to present passages from both the Old and New Testaments which highlight the Bible's view that women should be less important in society than men. It should be noted that this debate is not in any way, shape, or form, about the Bible's validity and accuracy, or…
- As agreed, no arguments will be posted in this round.
Against
- I will now begin my rebuttals. Old Testament MisogynyNearly from the Beginning. .. "Genesis 2:18: "The Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him. "" Indeed, it is not good for a man to be alone. However, God created another…
- PLEASE NOTE: I have made this debate impossible to accept. If you find a way to accept this debate, you forfeit all 7 points. If you wish to debate this topic, please inquire in the comments if you meet the criteria, listed below.Criteria1. You must have in-depth knowledge of…
- 2432.
It is more likely than not that God exists
For
- I will be proving that the universe was created by a God that is omnipotent and omnipresent. The creation of the universe and the creation of laws are all consistent with a designer.The Beginning of the UniverseWe know that the Universe has a beginning. The Big Bang model…
- I thank F-16 for engaging me in this debate! It is more likely than not that God exists. God: an omnipresent, omnipotent creator of the universe.
Against
- I'll combine my arguments and my opponent's since they overlap quite a bit.1) Anything that begins to exist must have a causeMy opponent says that anything that begins to exist must have a cause. However, she doesn't specify why this is the case. She also claims that this cause…
- I also suggest that we use the normal dictionary definitions of the words "omnipresent," "omnipotent," "creator," and "universe. "Omnipresent: Being present everywhere at once. http://www.thefreedictionary.com...Omnipotent: Having unlimited or universal power.…
- 2433.
Atheists have less moral grounding than Christians
For
- Remember do not vote.
- Me and Aithlin agree three rounds isn't sufficient enough for this debate. If you want to follow this debate here's a link http://www.debate.org...
Against
- This debate will be continued at the link that ClashnBoom provided.
- I agree that 3 rounds are not sufficient enough for this debate. I urge the audience to NOT vote on this debate.
- 2434.
God loves atheists as much as believers
For
- I'm sorry that I offended your imaginary friend. Maybe he shouldn't be so sensitive.See? You lied, you are not sorry. I called you a liar in the last round and I'm calling you a liar now. Yoo should be ashamed of yourself. You want proof of God while you deny that He is being…
- I'm sorry that I offended your imaginary friend. Maybe he shouldn't be so sensitive.You are not sorry, and He loves you still. He is being patient with you because He does not want you to go to Hell.Pro keeps on asserting that God loves atheists, This was the topic of the…
Against
- "You want proof of God while you deny that He is being patient"Pro has still provided no proof that God exists. "I am compelled to tell people God loves them and offers them eternal life"I'll be honest. I think I've become more atheistic over the course of this debate. "The…
- "You are not sorry, and He loves you still. He is being patient with you because He does not want you to go to Hell."Still waiting for the proof about the existence of God."This was the topic of the debate. I want to commend you for your observation that in the debate entitled…
- 2435.
God speaks to humans directly
For
- Please find me in the bible where it states either of them were prophets ,, assuming that you read your bible any Man who is.in fact a prophet has it stated in his title // of all people solomon and moses- people of their caliber would most definitely have it stated in their…
- God Most Definitely Does talk to people other than prophets directly. I have many associates who I can guarentee are not prophets. All christians can have a prophetic on some level, but that doesnt make them prophets . But God can speak to anybody,, for example Moses wasnt a…
Against
- here some verse...34:10 Deuteronomy Since then, no prophet has risen in Israel like Moses, whom the LORD knew face to face, Solomon is a prophet in the talmud, and for job i dont know... anyway In Islam they are propehts... job moses and solomon peace of upon them all. you said…
- How on earth Moses and solomon(peace be upon them) werent a prophets of God? LOL buddy you dont know your bible. pleaes tell me you are trolling..
- 2436.
The Islamic promise of paradise rewards shows the religion is false
For
- "Even though the Qur'an does not mention the number of virgins, it does say in verse 56:36[27] that Muslim men will be awarded with virgins in Paradise. The Qur'an describes their physical attributes, for example they will have large eyes (56:22) and big breasts (78:33)[20] and…
- i know i can't deductively prove islam is false. but if i can show it has wrong aspects according to more objectives sources of morality, then it shows evidence of it being a false religion. as to the christian points. it was never official teaching as it is with islam and…
Against
- My source to previous round: . http://www.justislam.co.uk... My opponent has not provided any sources to prove he's statement is true, looking at the first paragraph. Nevertheless, I have stated in my previous round that the Hadith is unreliable and the translators have made a…
- "i know i can't deductively prove islam is false." My opponent has stated that he cannot prove Islam is false, but only by the immorality of the religion. As I have stated before, that logic is false, based on the definition of false. Therefor, there is no way to prove that any…
- 2437.
If free will exists, an all-knowing God is impossible
For
- you seem to have completely missed my argument. my argument was that because god already knew they would Eat the fruit, they were unable to not eat the fruit because if they had god would be wrong and there for not all knowing. This raises the question how can someone be blamed…
- the test in Eden is a flawed one, if god knows all than he must know the future so before he ever posed this test he knew they would fail. this same argument could be made today. so when you are born god already knows you will go to heaven or hell. does this not negate free…
Against
- First of all, thank you for the come back of my opponent Your topic of the debate was:"If there is free will than an all knowing god is not possible", so if I can proof that my an all knowing God and free will can coexist, then I will win this debate. "you seem to have…
- "the test in Eden is a flawed one, if god knows all than he must know the future so before he ever posed this test he knew they would fail. this same argument could be made today. so when you are born god already knows you will go to heaven or hell. does this not negate free…
- 2438.
James was the blood brother of Jesus
For
- CONCLUSIONMy opponent makes a couple of interesting points. First, that Mat 23:8 has Jesus tell the disciples to call one another "brother," and the word adelphoi is indeed used in this instance. He therefore asserts that the brothers of Jesus might be disciples.There are a…
- REBUTTALMy opponent claims that there is no word for cousin in Hebrew, and that a longer circumlocution is employed in the text of the Tanakh, e.g. Gen 29:10, "Rachel was his cousin—the daughter of Laban, his mother's brother." In the main, this is correct, although the words…
Against
- My opponent states, "That they are blood brothers is in little doubt from the text." to which I say this is possibly the most preposterous statement made in this entire debate. This is a topic that has been debated continuously for literally centuries. In my opponents opening…
- I apologize for being unclear in my first post I was talking about Hebrew as the language that the majority of Old Testament was written in, and Aramaic as the language of Jesus, which is neither here nor there as you wish to discount the the use of brother in the old testament…
- 2439.
Atheism is a more reasonable belief than belief in the biblical God
For
- First for all who don't know what "atheism" is. in which nearly 100% of the population on planet earth doesn't, it is simply by the very definition of the dictionary "1. the doctrine or belief that there is no God. 2. disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings." DO…
- I have free will because I am smart, educated, and intelligent enough to never believe in your god. You on the other hand believe in your god, therefore you do not have Free Will. PE-RI-OD. Since you did not watch the videos or pay any attention to what I said, and since your…
Against
- Honestly, I'm agnostic and overall agree with you. However, I'll play devil's advocate so that you can destroy some arguments that hardcore Christians want to use.
- So what if God kills women and children? He gives life and can take it away whenever he pleases. God owes us nothing. First of all you ignorantly just ignoring my argument about free will. God can interfere with a murder, it's just that he won't. Big difference between can't…
- 2440.
A secular society should not prevent religious people from acting on their beliefs
For
- While I am rather a strict atheist, or antitheist some might say, I do genuinely believe that religion has not only the universal right to be expressed, but the constitutional right. By this, I mean firstly it's one of our most basic and palpable human rights, and secondly,…
- I will argue in the affirmative: a secular society should not prevent religious people from acting on their beliefs. Second Arguments in favor of your stance. Statistics must be supplied. Third round is counter arguments and further comments. Fourth closing statements.…
Against
- My arguments stand, and my opponent has not fulfilled their burden of proof.
- My arguments stand.
- 2441.
Pagan gods can be disproven without disproving the Christian God
For
- There is no archaeological evidence to support the existence of pagan gods, but there is to support the existence of the Christian God. There is a lot of archaeological evidence to confirm the Bible, and it proves that God exists. For example, it has been proven that David…
- Thank you, Mizah, for clarifying the definition of the word "pagan." I will now disprove all of the pagan gods without disproving my own God in two arguments. A1: The main idea of my first argument is that if the Solar System was created by a deity, then only the Christian God…
Against
- I know It might've been good to find a more polite way to put this, but that argument there is the most perfect example of "bias" I have ever seen. You have admitted that both events relating to well-known pagan gods have been supported by archaeological evidence , as well as…
- ^_^ But now that bit of confusion cleared up, let't get some good debating going. The premise of your arguments seems to be that it would have taken an omnipotent god such as the christian god in order to have formulated the proper conditions for our existence, and without one,…
- 2442.
God and the Bible are real
For
- The reason why I said your first premise is flaws is because of your view of the premise. I was making the point that instead of using the premise against God, I was using it as evidence, Because if finite beings can describe the God of an infinite universe, Then God is not…
- So I will start. Your first premise is flawed. You say that because the God of the Universe Has so many names it would be difficult to explain God. That is 100 percent correct. God is Not bound by time, He is sovereign, Omnipotent, And boundless perfect figure. Because God has…
Against
- I was making the point that instead of using the premise against God, I was using it as evidence, Because if finite beings can describe the God of an infinite universe, Then God is not infinite, And therefore is illogical that the God I believe was God. But God is infinite, A…
- Your first premise is flawed. You say that because the God of the Universe Has so many names it would be difficult to explain God. That is 100 percent correct. God is Not bound by time, He is sovereign, Omnipotent, And boundless perfect figure. Because God has many names is…
- 2443.
It is more probable that Jesus was God than not
For
- You said, "My problem with this is that there is absolutely no logical connection between ones supernatural powers and his claims about his own divine status being true." I think that since we have already seen the gospels are reliable and that there is a high probability that…
- When you outlined my logic at the beginning of your round, you were almost correct but not entirely. I will try and clarify and I apologize for not doing it previously because I used up all 8,000 characters. I'm simply saying that the evidence of the gospels and Paul's accounts…
Against
- I do not agree with Pro's interpretation of Matthew. There are 3 parts to that section: 1) Disciples ask when apocalypse will happen. 2) Jesus says there will be wickedness, tribulation, a heavenly sign (interpreted as a second coming), then the world ends. 3) Jesus says "I say…
- I still believe that I outlined your logic correctly. You say "the gospels and Paul's accounts being accurate plus the fact of resurrection would bring us to the conclusion that it is more probable that Jesus was God". However, the resurrection and other miracles, as factual,…
- 2444.
Affirming God's existence denies Him as creator
For
- REPLIES //The confusion that later follows is because existence is used in an ambiguous way. Pro implies that existence only applies to things that have a cause.// >> Please point out where and how I made an implication of existence depending on causation. I assure you, there…
- ARGUMENTS: This is simple enough that there is diffuclty in making the argument long enough. If we are to theoretically assume that God may and/or has created existence then we must assume that he is beyond existence. To paraphrase what Paul Tillich said, claiming God exists is…
Against
- I would like to get some minor things out of the way first, so I can then concentrate on what I consider the more important arguments in this debate. Pro says "Whether or not God has a cause is irrelevant to my argument. " & "If it is granted to your argument that uncaused…
- Pro says "If we are to theoretically assume that God may and/or has created existence then we must assume that he is beyond existence. " The confusion that later follows is because existence is used in an ambiguous way. Pro implies that existence only applies to things that…
- 2445.
The Christian God exists
For
- According to Wkipedia MORALITY is the differentiation of intentions decisions and actions between those that are "good" and those that are "evil" or "bad" and the Golden Rule states "One should treat others as one would wish others to treat oneself. " Now I believe everyone…
- I wish to challenge any and all agnostics and atheists to an all out speed debate. I Octo have nine simple words that will crush all of atheism and hopefully point thousands to Christ. Frist though(before I reveal the nine words) I wish to debate anyone who thinks they can make…
Against
- Well this was a flop.. Its too bad, I thought it started out pretty good! Do you think I had him questioning his beliefs. He did challenge me to make him an unbeliever! Thought I might have gotten to him! But... I doubt it! If I was going to create a panic room out of anything…
- Bummer. Not really excited about this win!
- 2446.
Assuming Christianity is true, atheism is morally wrong
For
- The argument is rather straightforward, I will be interested to see how my opponent responds. If the Christian view is true, then the following propositions are also true: 1. Justice requires as a minimum measure, giving to each his due. (1) 2. God, as the Creator and supreme…
- Continuing a controversy started in the opinion page, Morgan2252 and I have agreed to debate two different aspects of the opinion that it is morally wrong to be an atheist, this first one that given the truth of Christianity it is morally wrong to be an atheist, and later on…
Against
- I accept. I'm looking forward to a great debate. :-)
- I talked with my opponent in the comments section, and we decided that this was just a misunderstanding on my part. We may do another debate later, but for now, I would like to forget this one. Please do us a favor and do not vote. Thank you.NO VOTING PLEASE.
- 2447.
God could become man in the person of Jesus
For
- I am visually disabled, please use your own words.
- Reference from gotquestions.org: https://www.gotquestions.org... Question: "How can Jesus be God, when Numbers 23:19 says that God is not a man or a son of man?" Answer: Some claim that the Old Testament proves that Jesus cannot be God because of Numbers 23:19a, which says,…
Against
- Shalom Dana, I'm sorry - I don't mean to be rude here - but what do you mean by being "visually disabled?" If you're suggesting I didn't write my last post, that's wrong, I did - I always write original, I'm a blogger, remember? - but I'm human, perhaps I slipped a little or…
- Shalom Dana, I hope you'll alright with me posting a google docs document as opposed to writing it out all here. Simply put, I have 14 pages worth of material discrediting all Jesus has to offer, and it won't fit here. So here we go! https://docs.google.com...
- 2448.
Belief in God is no longer relevant to modern society
For
- Much thanks to Lupricona for his/her argument and questions. I hope this dialogue will bring greater understanding between our positions. 1) I'll start off my responses by saying that we truly live in a strange time when a creationist can ask this question and not feel some…
- 1)Why do you take philosophical arguments to be more powerful than science and historic records? I guess I can understand a belief in God (though I think that conclusion is needless) but why Creationism? Why should an immaterial subject like philosophy refute biology,…
Against
- I will now ask you some of my own: It seems to me that almost everyone in the world has beliefs that are not entirely created by themselves. Given a certain time and culture, it is easy to predict the beliefs of an individual. Because of the fact that there are so many…
- Introduction:Thank you, CON, for allowing me to debate you in this topic.I will attempt to use sound arguments to justify the belief in God.The Existence of God- A Priori ArgumentsMind Over MatterThis universe consists of matter and energy. In the theistic understanding of the…
- 2449.
The Bible is infallible
For
- Sorry I'm a little busy right now. I'll post next round.
- I thank Con for instigating this debate. I'm hoping to have fun in this debate while at the same time educating the viewers on our distinct viewpoints. By the end of this debate, I'm hoping to present my case on why I believe the Bible is the infallible, inerrant Word of God. I…
Against
- This debate is will be deciding whether the Christian Bible is infallible.I will be taking the CON side of this debate, i.e The Bible is NOT infallible (is fallible).Definitions:Infallible: incapable of error. [1]Bible: the sacred scriptures of Christians comprising the Old…
- I completely understand, and I ask the judges not to count that as a forfeit. I will extend my arguments so that you may respond to them this round.Cheers!Max
- 2450.
Judas witnessed Jesus after the resurrection
For
- Maybe Judas is still alive? Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom. If some are still alive, it could be Judas!
- Because Jesus sowed himself to the 12, it means that Judas was included. Hello? Is my opponent there?
Against
- Judas did not see the Resurrection of Jesus because he hanged himself. Mathew 27:5 "So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself."
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?