Politics Debate Topics — page 35
3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1701.
A nation with only one political party functions better than one with two
For
- 1. Republicans do have a set of principles that guide them. This is what makes them republican. Not my opinion. 2. Though the US is not a Christian nation, it is made up of predominately Christians, especially in certain regions of the country. 3. I could use the Bible to prove…
- 1. Republican have their basic principals which put them in that party. There may be differences in opinions among the party but not as much as between republicans and democrat.(I am only saying republican now but the same goes for the democrats.) 2. "So move to Iran. Or Saudi…
Against
- "2. Though the US is not a Christian nation, it is made up of predominately Christians, especially in certain regions of the country. 3. I could use the Bible to prove my point about gays, but I am sure that you do not want to hear it. I will simply say that my opinion…
- I still don't understand why you think one party systems are so wonderful. Communist China was a one party system, Soviet Russia was a one party system, Nazi Germany was a one part system, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge was a one party system. While there are countries with one…
- 1702.
Powerful countries have a responsibility to keep weaker ones in check
For
- i will differentiate between exploitation and keeping in check positively , it is one of the responsibilities of the powerful countries to keep weak ones in check for three reasons , first point is , some countries have economical problems that maybe will help the government or…
- to be a powerful country it does not mean you have to have developed economy , or high population , one of the conditions to be a powerful country is to keep weak ones in check , because it makes your Foreign relations stronger ,
Against
- Did you ever hear of Hosni Mubarak. According to my research he is a bad leader or Egypt. The US helped Egypt by giving them 2 billion. They spent 1.3 billion on military (smart). And .7 billion went into his pockets and the pockets of other government people. Also if you were…
- No! Powerful countries worked to hard to earn what they have.
- 1703.
Post-9/11 security measures outweigh harms to personal freedom
For
- This was a really close round.
- figures...
Against
- Ok I'm gonna let my opponent start with their case, then I will follow with my rebuttals, then we will have Q&A round, then we will make our final speeches.
- 1704.
Liberals are no less able than conservatives
For
- The fear of a terrorist attack from Muslim refugees is somewhat irrationally placed, only 20 out of 3.25 million refugees in general have attempted terrorism, with only three deaths (The deaths are from Cuban refugees). Very very few terrorists are refugees, in fact a terrorist…
- Though this argument is because of a misspelling, I will argue on my misspelling. Though many liberals exhibit cognitive dissonance, so do many republicans though not always to the extent. Liberals have a heart they just don't always think to back it up with their head, for…
Against
- "Even terrorists are still people and therefore capable of both change and morality."False. Terrorists can be given chances? Are they not threats to society? Utterly ridiculous. See this is why I see Liberals as less intelligent that conservatives,So are child molesters to be…
- "Muslim Refugees. Refugees are people that are fleeing almost certain death Muslim or not, if we show them kindness even the few unknown extremes are able to change"The problem is the refugees and Islam. The liberals must seem to want the refugees, yet they are not aware of the…
- 1705.
Africa should be given a permanent UN Security Council seat with veto power
For
- An African voice would change priorities for the better
- The UNSC mostly deals with Africa
Against
- Proportionality
- More vetoes mean less action
- 1706.
The United States is the best nation in the world
For
- I accept
Against
- Well, that was a short debate...
- Was does it mean to be the best nation? What qualifications must a country have in order to fit under this category? A nation that is dubbed the 'best nation' means that other nations look up to that nation and want to be just like them. When ever I hear the words 'America' and…
- 1707.
The Electoral College should be abandoned
For
- Definitely have a pretty complete understanding of the electoral college. Unfortunately my opponent doesn't even bother addressing my main argument in this debate. The win ====== In the United States, under the electoral college a presidential candidate can focus on the top…
- Thank you for the argument. But I'm going to go out on a limb and actually advocated the opposite. I'm going to argue each of my opponents points of interest and then I'll get to some of my own points of interest. 1. The small states cry ================ I have various…
Against
- While I appreciate my opponent's research on the population of each state, my position still stands. I can only conclude that those who disagree with the Electoral College do so because they simply just don't understand it. Almost like it's too complicated or something, and…
- Most people who favor abolishing the Electoral College (EC) believe that a Nationwide Popular Vote (NPV) for the presidency is "more fair" because it better reflects the will of the people as to who should be president. This is an age old issue which goes back to the Founding…
- 1708.
The United States should never have intervened in Iraq
For
- Although, you have once again made a very good point. We must realise that this is sometimes the best decision. It is true, that in dark points in history like the holocaust - many people would say that we should have been involved, because it would have saved the lives of many…
- Although this is a good point, there has never been any evidence of 'weapons of mass destruction'. Regardless though, is it not true to say that, Iraq would have never 'attacked' America or the allies unless provoked? I do not see Iraq lashing out towards countries in Africa,…
Against
- If an acquaintance of yours were dying in front of you, would you not get involved in their affairs? The same can be said with Iraq, a country is perishing right in front of the US and it is difficult to just watch it die. If we helped Iraq we could of gained a friend and made…
- George W. Bush sent troops into Iraq for a reason we are not sure of. All the lies he has told lead to an unclear reason why there are troops in Iraq. The lies have ranged from Saddam having links to 9/11 to Iraq having nuclear weapons that they were going to use on us and our…
- 1709.
Russia's invasion of Crimea was unjustified
For
- After pressuring President Yanukovych into not signing the EU Association Agreement, Russia then effectively offered Ukraine $15 billion as a thank you gift. However, the Euromaidan protesters refused to accept this and finally, when the bloodshed became too much to deal with,…
Against
- The West has done its best to destabalise Ukraine, as they have done to great effect in Syria and Libya. The Whitehouse and its allies have decided that they need to do more than just fund and arm extreme Islamists so as to order the world as they desire it.Through the US…
- Sadly my opponent forfeited. Please vote for me, atleast i have enough respect for everyone not to leave a debate i started.
- 1710.
Western intervention in Libya has been a success
For
- Intervention prevented an impending bloodbath in Benghazi.
- Ushered in the liberation of Libya.
Against
- It increased conflict and instability in Libya and its neighbours.
- Created a large divide in the UN security council.
- 1711.
The mainstream media has a greater liberal bias than conservative bias
For
- Yes, I forgot to credit the source where I found the poll. I will take the hit on that. Here it is: (http://www.gallup.com...) I apologize for the for the forfeit. I wasn't receiving emails about updates and the debate got lost in my other debates I had as well. The reliability…
- Through out the years, Fox News has never had enough scrutiny for acting as the conservative side of the news. Yes. I do agree that Fox News has a more Conservative mindset than any other news outlet in the US. However, Networks such as MSNBC, NBC, CBS, PBS, ABC and WBRE are…
Against
- Don't worry it's fine, I enjoyed this debate overall. ResolutionThe resolution is about the media as you stated in your previous rounds "There is more of a liberal bias than a conservative bias in the media". Academic professors barely hold any relevant arguments, because A)…
- There was a slight problem with the website(http://www.debate.org...) which also apply to arguments as well as I had problems posting mine in another debate. Although, I don't know exactly why he forfeited.Thanks.
- 1712.
Communism is an ineffective system and should be abolished
For
- Con has seemingly lied to you to win this argument. He has suggested a false dichotomy, there do not exist only 3 systems. To say this is to ignore the enourmous political spectrum in existance today. We can observe that as the spectrum increasingly controls the economy new…
- Before I start my rebuttal I'm just going to go ahead and ask about why you want the definition of abolished and what problems you have with "abandoned". I find it absolutely unnecessary that you bring up such self-evident statements. My opponent has made a false assumption…
Against
- I would like to point out that it is not a false dichotomy. I never suggested that there are only three systems. I was speaking from a perspective of historical determinism which states that capitalism is preceeded always by feudalism and succeeded always by socialism. This is…
- I did not make a false assumption on your position. Communism and socialism exist as an alternative to capitalism. Those are the only two choices in this period of history. Should we return to feudalism? I would also like to point out that you cite absolutely no references for…
- 1713.
Primary elections should be abolished
For
- Primary elections are democratic and representative enough
- National primaries produce sound bite politics
Against
- Complicated US primaries lead to misleading vote counts
- Rotating regional primaries solve the problems of the current process
- 1714.
Political corruption in the United States will not be abolished soon
For
- Still no response from my opponent.
- Still no response from my opponent.
Against
- Pro you argue against yourself here by stipulating that corruption will not be abolished in this you mention that mass action will need to take place every year people want to become more liberal fro their government we see this all over the world e.g libya,syria Tunisia so…
- 1715.
The United States should be a democracy
For
- I forfeit the final round.
- I forfeit this round
Against
- I forfeit this round
- oh okay well luck in your other debates
- 1716.
Unilateral US military force is justified to stop nuclear proliferation
For
- I would like to first to over my opponents arguments and then my own if necessary. My opponent's first point seemed to just talk about why its a bad idea, but the question is: do we have good reasons to (Justification)? Nuclear proliferation is one of our largest threats to our…
- We are all aware that there is a McDonalds in about every city in the world. Imagine if for every other one, there was a nuclear weapon in the world. According to McDonalds, that would be a lie. There are actually even MORE nuclear weapons than that. I stand in firm affirmation…
Against
- In conclusion, unilateral military force by the United States for the purposes of nuclear non-proliferation are unjust, because it has never been shown to work historically, unilateral actions of the U.S. have been historically against the will of the people, and it is highly…
- "My opponent's first point seemed to just talk about why its a bad idea, but the question is: do we have good reasons to (Justification)? Nuclear proliferation is one of our largest threats to our security today which is in itself a perfectly good reason to use unilateral…
- 1717.
Electing a minority president would benefit the United States
For
- I think I understand what your saying. But in the case of Oprah,what if she endorsed Senator Barack Obama because of what she believes he can do for this country! Should she be harassed just because he happens to be black? I don't think so! I think that voting in a minority…
- I am in favor of a minority becoming president! As long as he/she can get the job done that they are elected to do!
Against
- In theory, you are right. But also in theory, communism is perfect and Hilliary does not have a vagina. moving on... IF they were elected in because they were good IF they were IF! the actuality is, they wouldn't be. There will always be a skewed vote. But lets assume we are in…
- First of all I am not a white supremacist and I agree with you, but I will play the devil's advocate in order to debate... Democracy- latin Demo -people cracy -clause meaning of in accordance to government thus the original definition of democracy was a government ruled by the…
- 1718.
The UN has a responsibility to protect
For
- Countries and governments have an obligation to protect human rights and defend their citizens from harm
- The United Nations has a responsibility to prevent genocide and mass atrocities.
Against
- The UN does not have the necessary funds or expertise.
- The UN would be turned into something that it is not.
- 1719.
Florida should legalize recreational marijuana
For
- "I'll grant you the conduct point for my my opening statement, since I won't need it to kick your @ss."Yes because your 57% win ratio clearly suggests you actually have a clue of what youre doing here and totally arent a complete idiot..... (Sarcasm)1) Legalizing weed…
- 2) California only legalized weed for medical purposes only. . http://www.rollingstone.com...3) If I was talking about legalizing medical weed only, I would have structured the resolution to say ". .. .. .. is for Florida to legalize medical weed". .. . But Im actually talking…
Against
- It didn't help California football teamsOakland raiders: garbageSan Diego chargers: garbageSan Francisco 49ers: overrated and blown out in the Super Bowl (until the mysterious light issue)
- I'll grant you the conduct point for my my opening statement, since I won't need it to kick your @ss. 1. Anyway when you legalize something any reason it will find its way into the wrong hands, just like guns, pornagraphic magazines, and brass knuckles. 2. Legalizing weed…
- 1720.
Representative democracy will turn into an oligarchy
For
- Con has forfeited his 2nd round, I refrain from adding more arguments. I take it that the Pro position is irrefutable. Just in case, I would be very interested if Con has any point against the deplorable resolution that the "representative" version of democracy is on a steady…
- I feel deeply that the resolution is an important insight for everyone who desires true democracy and should be universally known to catalyse a important overhaul of democracy. Here is my case: Those democracies which use the election process instead of demarchic pronciples…
Against
- I will not allow oligarchy. You mention about passing power to the family members right? But sometimes, having this kind of government would lead to political dynasty.
- 1721.
Bashar al-Assad should step down from power
For
- Alright, my opponent has no intrest in debating this. If he did, he would of used R4 to defend his points, instead of posting two articles he didn't write, that didn't relate anything to the debate. All my refutation the past two rounds has been completely dropped by my…
- I. Con's "88% of votes" argumentI believe our dearest Kiim Jung Un was elected by 100% of the votes, and that's with a population of about 25 million. The problem with the "so called" Syrian elections, is that they weren't the sligt bit democratic. That same 75% of the world…
Against
- Lets start off by enjoying this song . () . My opponent started off claiming that the elections in Syria where not democratic and compared them to elections in DPRK . There are big differences between the two and Bashar al-Assad did not win by 100% . 'If you suspect that any…
- My opponent has said 'I want to start by saying, its absolutely absurd that Slavic has given me the BOP. I will let the audience decide if I should truly be held by it. With that said, I am going to ignore much of my opponents OP. Refuting it does not defeat the BOP which I may…
- 1722.
The US federal government should build a border fence
For
- The Need to Control Immigration Immigration across the southern border floods the labor market with low-skilled workers, creating a slack (or loose) labor market. This means business owners now have the ability to choose from a large selection of workers instead of having to…
- #allinforjeb
Against
- DOTWThis is a part of Tej's DEBATE OF THE WEEK efforts, and this will be this week's DEBATE OF THE WEEK! For more details please view the link:(. http://www.debate.org...) The Full resolution is "Resolved: The United States Federal Government should build a border fence along…
- Pass
- 1723.
The United States was justified in invading Afghanistan
For
- I have length crisis. I wrote a 12 thousand characters response but I am only allowed 8 thousand characters. So I need to focus on certain things. I am bringing this debate back to the qeustion. Did the US need to invade Afghanistan. And the answer to that is yes. For what was…
- I. That is not so. Anybody who does any amount of research will understand that warlords city officials and the Taliban have been deeply engrained in Afghani society and culture the first two more so than the ladder. Also your pointing the finger in the wrong Direction. When…
Against
- I. Refutations You claim that city officials, warlords, and the Taliban are all entrenched in Afghanistan, which is my point. This has not changed even after invading Afghanistan, there has been no benefit. You then say I'm pointing the finger in the wrong direction, but…
- It was not necessary for the United States to invade Afghanistan. I. The Taliban regime could have been overthrown without an invasion, and as well, the power of the warlords could have easily been broken. 1. If we are to accept the affirmative in saying that the population was…
- 1724.
Police officers in the UK should routinely carry firearms
For
- Absolutely!
- Protecting communities
Against
- It is hypocritical and will not benefit civilians
- Arming the police will do more harm than good
- 1725.
Affirmative action is good for society
For
- Affirmative action is used to eliminate job discrimination. In the past, only white males were allowed to have jobs. Also, you provided no sources for your argument.
- I accept.
Against
- Look, I have a busy schedule, so I'm going to make this argument short. Between giving minorities bonus points on SATs and required percentage of minorities in a company, with the same thing occurring for women, affirmative action somehow manages to be racist to all races.…
- Round 2: Opening arguments. Round 3: Rebutting your opponent's opening arguments. Round 4: Defending your opening arguments against your opponent's rebuttal of your arguments. BoP is 50/50. Let's have a good, clean, and civilized debate.
- 1726.
The United States should abolish the Electoral College
For
- The Electoral College is fundamentally flawed. There are no aspects of the system that make it better than a direct popular vote. It gives smaller states more power than others, allows Electors to completely ignore the election outcomes of the states they are representing,…
- My opponent argues that the current system sustains the current two-party system effectively. This, I agree, is true. However, who says the two party system is even effective? I'l try to keep this short, as this topic is probably more suitable for a different debate, but I…
Against
- Indeed, according to Article II section I the constitution, the framers of the constitution upheld that the president would be selected based on the electoral process. First and for most, the electoral college in my perspective, is a suitable solution in regards to electing the…
- 1727.
The EU is on the verge of collapse
For
- Well i can have several valid reasons why i think the EU gonna collapse. 1: It was EU fault that Greece is gonna leave the Eurozone, borrowing money from the EU owing back the bailout plus with interest will probably leave them with no money, so Greece has no choice to leave…
- If Greece leaves the EU is it possible that a "Domino Effect" could start to unravel the fabric of all EU Countries?
Against
- Round 3 Forfeit by Opponent. What else is there left to say.
- Greece is in the sh*ter because they can't control their spending. Don't blame EU because Greece needed to borrow money in the first place just because they cant pay back the interest due to their incompetence. They will likely be kicked out for their own actions not, the EU's.…
- 1728.
The United States ought to end its provision of arms to foreign insurgents
For
- I'm sorry Tej, but I need to concede. I'm sorry that I couldn't follow through with the debate, but I took up a position to teach and I've been way too involved in it. You did a great job, though.
- Harm Caused by Insurgents In Afghanistan, over two-thirds of civilian casualties were a result of insurgents, and this is a 28% increase from 2009. [1] One of the reasons that there is such a large increase could be due to Russia supplying weapons to Taliban insurgents. [2]…
Against
- Good luck on your teaching position. Thanks for the gracious concession.
- Thanks for the debate, and for not forfeiting.
- 1729.
New voting requirements should be repealed
For
- That actually makes a lot of sense. I've seen plenty of random vote bombing where people just appear out of the blue and vote on a topic. Why not just make a time restraint or something else?
- On this site. I cite myself as an example. Now I have to complete 3 debates to even vote on these debates. This is ridiculous. I can provide my cellphone number. I assure you I am a great voter. I read debates. I vote nonbiasely. I have taken the side of a debater I have…
Against
- Obviously the precaution was put into practice to prevent idiots from making uneducated decisions and to keep people from creating multiple accounts and just voting for themselves. While the three debate requirement may be irritating and inconvenient, it is for the betterment…
- .. but only if you have participated in three or more debates. :)
- 1730.
Governments should provide welfare benefits
For
- welfare strives to promote the basic well-being of individuals in need. These efforts usually strive to improve the financial situation of people in need but may also strive to improve their employment chances and many other aspects of their lives. welfare helps people who…
- I will let my opponent go 1st
Against
- Pro responds by telling us what welfare aims to do; however, she fails to mention that welfare doesn't work. If it did, then welfare programs would be decreasing after helping people, instead of increasing by fostering more incentives for non-production and the creation of a…
- Hey - Welcome to DDO! Good luck :) -- -- -- Ill begin by assuming that this debate is focused around the United States. As such, it's fair to say that we live in a capitalistic society. When we do something that works, we are rewarded with money and subsequently continue doing…
- 1731.
Same-sex marriage should be legalized
For
- Arguments are made that GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered) people should not be aloud to raise children. First of all, this argument is null and void. Statistics have shown that children raised in GLBT families are just as well off and possibly better off then…
Against
- Unfortunately my opponent has failed to post again. I would like to point out that I have refuted his points and provided my own reasons for banning SSM. Yes the goverment can deny rights to citizens. You do not see the goverment providing benefits to same sex couples who are…
- Seeing as my opponent was a little tardy I will an argument this round to let him catch up. Merry Christmas!
- 1732.
The EU should adopt a common foreign policy
For
- The creation of the post of a High Representative marked an important change in the EU.
- The EU has already been unifying on multiple fronts, this is just a step in the same direction.
Against
- There have been tests on the EU's ability to create a common foreign policy that it has failed.
- The post of a High Representative is merely a shadow of what it should have been, and its failure shows the EU's inability to consolidate foreign policy.
- 1733.
Democracy is no longer the best form of government
For
- It is not encouraging that my opponent likes to spend half of his second round attacking my motives, rather than my warrants. I will assure that you that my arguments shifted in order to address the things that you were saying, as they should in every good debate. If you offer…
- I would first like to address your complaints on my title. I should have been more specific; what I meant to say was that democracy is no longer the best form of government in my mind. For the first 99% of my life it was my belief that democracy was what was right, as I just…
Against
- Rebuttals. Your claim: "It is not at all impossible to have a single person who will never lose integrity in the face of power. I believe it is much more likely to find a person with such a character than it is to vote in thousands of people and to expect all of them to hold…
- I will let you know aKaQ that your (not so subtle) attempt to change the topic of this debate have not gone unnoticed. The topic is "Democracy is no longer the best form of government" and no matter how much you need this to change for the sake of your argument, it will not!…
- 1734.
Ronald Reagan should have been convicted of treason and impeached
For
- Second round is construction only. No new arguments may be brought up in the final round. This includes new rebuttals/responses. You may only use this round to summarize, clarify, and/or restate what you have already said. This debate is in reference to Ronald Reagan, 40th…
- As this is the final round, any points that my opponent has dropped cannot be rebutted, except by cross examination with previous points. Dropped Points-Rawhide did sell arms to iran-Rawhide did give direct orders to do so-When the terrorists discovered they could trade US…
Against
- It has been a fun time :D I will summarize my view. No one who was charged was charged with treason. Hezbollah a terrorist group took hostages. Rawhide's administration sold arms to the Iran Government not Hezbollah. We were not at war with Iran and they were not enemies of the…
- "The problem at hand though is that Rawhide was providing aid to terrorists who were taking American hostages. These were combatants who were enemies of the state" The combatants that took american hostages were not Iranian soldiers. They were terrorist (Hezbollah). We did not…
- 1735.
Abolishing nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal
For
- The nuclear genie is out of the bottle, and there is no way to go back. Nuclear technology exists, and there is no way to un-invent it (Robinson, 2001). Much as the ideal of global disarmament is fine, the reality is that it is impossible: it takes only one rogue state to…
- The nuclear genie is out of the bottle, and there is no way to go back. Nuclear technology exists, and there is no way to un-invent it (Robinson, 2001). Much as the ideal of global disarmament is fine, the reality is that it is impossible: it takes only one rogue state to…
Against
- In 1996, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. The treaty, which calls for an end to all nuclear testing, includes provisions for extensive and independent mechanisms for the monitoring of nuclear activities. Such…
- In 1996, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. The treaty, which calls for an end to all nuclear testing, includes provisions for extensive and independent mechanisms for the monitoring of nuclear activities. Such…
- 1736.
The United States should intervene in Ukraine
For
- Thank you. For future use, I will clarify my case. I believe that supporting the Ukrainian army in mainland Ukraine will benefit not only them, but to the local nations nearby. Now, I have to prove that it is conceivable that Russia would back off or not to make such bold…
- Thank you. I will now outline my case. POINT ONE: Russian actions mirror Germany's actions before WW2. We all know about the events that taken played around Germany before WW2, right? The tactic of Appeasement, of course, didn't work out. So, I ask you this; would it be…
Against
- As outlined in round 1, "The Military intervention we are talking about must be significant enough to conceivably halt Russian intervention." In order to determine the consequences of the military intervention, and therefore understand if we should affirm or negate the topic we…
- For the record, this is for the DDO Olympics: Super Combined Round 2.
- 1737.
Congress should have term limits
For
- I would like to point out to my opponent that the title of the debate is "Term limits for Congress". This refers to our current congress, not one in your proposed system. To rebut my opponent's statements on my 2nd attack: This is exactly what I mean. If you know you have no…
- I would like to begin by asking that my opponent focus their attack on the subject matter, not a voting system. While on the matter, however, I would like to point out that I found some potential issues I found with their system. If you would like to discuss them, please…
Against
- I am also thanking my opponent for making this a good debate.
- Debate is about term limits in general. Resolution does not say term limits within current voting system. Since term limits are highly dependent on and are part of election system, we do not require new debate. I am arguing that having term limits and not having term limits…
- 1738.
Economic sanctions should not be used to achieve foreign policy goals
For
- I am so so so sorry. I had a travel tournament this weekend and I completely forgot about this. Please give me the loss here.
- The affirmative's advocacy is that the United States Federal Government ought not use economic sanctions against Iran to achieve its foreign policy objectives. Parametricizing is legitimate because 1) The consequence that results from the use of sanctions varies from scenario…
Against
- Um... Maybe we can finish this next round?
- PROGRESSIVE!!!! YES! -- I negate I value Morality. Morality is implicit in the resolution since it is the only way to evaluate the topic, as it is a question of moral obligation. Morality is the framework for decision making of an individual as well as society. The logical…
- 1739.
The FCC should substantially increase investment in broadband access
For
- We as the american people have a moral obligation to help and defend those whom are in the dark, if we are to neglect these people the ability to gain information and pull them from this hell in which they have no means to learn and are simply discriminated against, how are we…
- Broadband is decreasing now, claimed to help the economy bla bla bla, (Vikki S. Katz, Matthew D. Matsaganis, and Sandra J. ball-Rokeach, Ph.D., University of Southern California, ETHNIC MEDIA AS PARTNERS FOR INCREASING BROADBAND ADOPTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION, Published 2012.…
Against
- First off, I'd like to point a couple reason why your specific plan would fail. 1. It seems to me that you're main argument for reasons as to why minorities are not voiced and racism is growing is simply b/c of ACCESS to broadband networks. Your specific plan only outlines to…
- Even if the gestures do count, you as the audience have to take into account my opponent's original plan of action and that it is through a government agency. Substantially increasing investment in the National Broadcast Plan won't be perceived as an attempt by the government…
- 1740.
Think tanks should disclose all their funding sources
For
- The status quo promotes non-transparency
- Think tanks' power of objectivity is the best form of marketing for biased views
Against
- Overregulating think tanks sets a dangerous precedent
- Private investors have a right to privacy
- 1741.
Democracy is the most desirable form of government
For
- Oh well...
- KC has asked that this debate go unvoted since he deactivated his account. I would, however, like to continue this debate later if he is amenable.
Against
- No votes. Good luck to bsh in the WODC!
- Responding to my opponent semantics play, democracy has indeed been defined as a "form of government in which supreme power is vested in the people, or exercised by them or by their elected agents under a free and fair electoral system" Note the words electoral system. This…
- 1742.
Voting should not be used to establish federal laws
For
- Indeed, apparently this debate has come down to the realm of technicalities. "My opponents definition of voting is so one-dimensional." First of all, regardless of how unconventional my Round 1 definition may seem, my arguments are based off of it. I am sure that, in an…
- Nonetheless, my argument still stands. In my opponent's Round 2, he states that voting will still be used, regardless of the better form of law establishment I have proposed. However, he has failed to refute the claims I have made regarding such a new form of law establishment,…
Against
- Ok, I'll take my opponents definition of voting, however I still win on topicality. Even with my opponents definition, which uses the word preference, it still comes out in my favor. Why? Because, once the government has come up with said mutual agreement, after the debate, all…
- Ok, so the basis winning basis is topicality and technicalities. I will prove the major point that you cannot vote pro because his way is still voting. "Voting - casting one's preference for a particular measure or resolution." My Response: My opponents definition of voting is…
- 1743.
The British monarchy should be abolished
For
- Good afternoon fellow Forum Members! As my username reveals, I am a 20 year old Danish student, carrying out a college project, about The British Monarchy. My aim of the Project is to analyze the branding of the Royal Family and finally assessable the Royal family"s chances…
Against
- hduhidui
- lalla
- 1744.
Right-wing politics is better for society than left-wing politics
For
- I disagree, People are different and there are always exceptions however depending on the subject some groups seem to be better than others and in return worse at other things. e i, Black people and physical sports. https://en.wikipedia.org.... One of my favorite thing about…
- I'm starting this round short. The Right has more individual freedom. Smarter people. http://ijr.com... Better looking https://www.washingtonpost.com... And much more
Against
- The "nanny state" you describe provides aid to millions of people who desperately need it: students, seniors, the mentally and physically handicapped, veterans, etc. Sometimes, people find themselves trapped in unfortunate situations; in such cases, governmental aid is…
- Having "better looking" or more scientifically literate people than the other side does not make one side "better" than the other. (Moreover, being more scientifically literate than someone else doe not make one "smarter".) The political side that is superior to the other is…
- 1745.
The communist experiment has failed
For
- this has been rather depressing
- are generally giving up or have you just forgotten?
Against
- The USSR and China were dictatorships and as such are not true to the ideals of a great workers paradise. If done correctly, I would wager, a communist nation could be not only a success but a utopia.
- 1746.
The Air Force should be disbanded
For
- ........The "I" word. I hate when people jsut throw that around. It means "not knowing" in some references but it can also be translated into our English word of "ignore". Good for you for having a meal with this "Colonel Otero". Yes the Special Forces are made up of most…
- I think that the United States Air Force is unnecessary. In the post 9/11 days counterterrorism missions are more effectively done on ground then on air. Sure you have piolts that can take down buildings and such as that, but that kind of operation would be better handled by…
Against
- While I admire that your argument is based off of funding, I think your criticism of the Air Force come from ignorance as to what the tens of billions of dollars pays for. To start with, I had dinner with a Colonel Otero in the fall of 2006. Colonel Otero, a member of the Air…
- I usually use it in the terms of not knowing, or uneducated. I typically don't ignore much. Air support is applied by all branches, in one way or another. In many cases this is done so that the operation can be coordinated by one branch, one division, one battalion, et cetera.…
- 1747.
Military rule is better than civilian rule
For
- In the civilian rule,opposition and criticism are tolerated.In the military these are not tolerated because in the bible,people in authority are not to be criticized because God placed them there.People in the civilian government tend to misuse the rigths With these points of…
- There have been many system of government.Military and Civilian government have existed.In this debate, I will tell you that military government is better than civilian government. One reason I say this is because in the military,discipline is observed than in the civilian…
Against
- Ok, look at how long the nation of Israel went before It's kings became corrupt, there are very few men that can lead a country without doing thing for themselves. I have pasted a URL below. It will take you to a website that says whether that king of Israel/Judah did evil or…
- I do agree on the fact that Military governments would get things done faster, but in the Military there is the chain of command, If one of the higher ranking officials where to become he would be able to order people around, and low ranking people that don't have clearance…
- 1748.
The US federal government should pay reparations to African Americans
For
- Maybe I wrote it for real life debate? ...Anyways, con disrupted the flow of debate and didn't meet their round 3 burden nor their round 4 (and I passed these because of con). This is essentially a forfeit - giving up on the debate. Copy/pasting is allowed in debate so I don't…
- Um, okay?It seems my opponent forfeited.
Against
- I am not the one forfeiting. I am pointing out the fact that you copy-pasted you argument and therefore your argument has no validity. I wrote my debate and you haven't.
- Considering my opponent has parts of his argument that say "we" the judges can conclude he/she has copy pasted this from either online or otherwise.
- 1749.
Corruption is necessary for some societies to function
For
- My opponent has dismantled my argument, and due to lack of resources, I am unable to to provide a counter point.
- Corruption in the world must always be needed in the world. People will argue that corruption, whether it's in government or any other section, must be stopped. Corruption does hurt the General population as people do seek to gain money and power for there own gain like former…
Against
- (:
- I will, however, proceed to disseminate and rebut some of my opponent's more self-defeating statements. "Corruption does hurt the General population as people do seek to gain money and power for there own gain like former Administrator of General Services Martha N. Johnson. Yet…
- 1750.
The Second Amendment should be strongly protected
For
- First of all regulate does not mean "to make regular" it means "regularly." so, do your homework before you before you state the facts buddy.
- look people the Second is being violated. People should have the right to bear arms. if you are attacked a gun would protect you. The criminals that use guns would ignore the law anyway. so take a side with me and say Yes to guns.
Against
- I'm not sure the judges here will take kindly to ad hominem and it is not necessary. To regulate means to make regular or "put into good order" (1) We also see in precedent with the Commerce Clause where regulation means "to make regular" commerce among the several states. (2)…
- "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." -Second Amendment of the US Constitution. Regulation means "To make regular" and Merriam-Webster defines militia as: a part of the…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?