Discussly

Politics Debate Topics — page 33

3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 33 of 73
  1. 1601.

    Gun control laws are ineffective at reducing gun violence

    For

    • Please excuse my absence, I have been busy doing more important things than debating strangers over the internet I said there was no use of nuclear weaponry because it is not used to defend one's property or self, it is used to destroy an area of interest, I would be killing…
    • And so you see, this is where my opponent likes to put words in my mouth, I never said anything about nuclear weapons, firearms are about precision, accuracy, and about hitting a specific target, a nuclear weapon is used to demolish a large mass of a population, no one ever…

    Against

    • No arguments to refute. Continue onto the next round
    • My opponent has made clear that he is in favor of the government eliminating the use of weaponry that can be used to demolish a large mass of a population. He has used several criterion for restricting weaponry: 1. Imprecise 2. Able to demolish more than one person at a time 3.…
  2. 1602.

    Nazism is not a far-left ideology

    For

    • My opponent dropped all of my arguments. Please extend them.
    • FrameworkThere are two reasons to accept my burdens analysis.The first is a textual link to the resolution. If Nazism proves to be at any point on the spectrum besides far-left, then it is not far-left and the resolution is true. It does not matter is Nazism is moderate,…

    Against

    • I would just like to justify your victory of this argument. You stated that you win by proving Naziism is far-right, and I win by proving it is far-left. However, you stated that even if I prove it is left, as long as it is not far-left I lose. I think this is unfair that even…
  3. 1603.

    Government should be allowed to spy on its citizens

    For

    • I agree that ron paul might of argue that the war on Drugs isn't worth it. But is that the problem no the problem is that the us is falling down if you hear on the news you will hear the percent of dollar changes and that might be nothing to you right now but that will change a…
    • too bad the us will lose is money value in fact the dollar dropped to 90 % and were already seeing changes like smaller portion sizes long time ago hamburgers and cheeseburgers were big and now when you look look at them you will see smaller sizes and untasty buns but im not…

    Against

    • Ron Paul is still old. He likes to spy on children. Common knowledge, my friend.
    • Ron Paul would argue that the war on Drugs isn't worth it. I'd rather not have Pot-headed hippies for US President.
  4. 1604.

    A leftist anarchist society could function effectively

    For

    • What the Spaniards practiced in the Spanish revolution was "Anarcho-Communism" which is a leftist Anarchist society.To be more specific, some of them practied "Anarcho-Syndicalism" etc, which all falls under the realm of leftist Anarchy.They had no Government, and they had no…
    • I extend my arguments

    Against

    • I didn't think about this: " Production was even higher than ever since so many people were helping. People also had more of an initiative to work since there were no oppressive tyrannical bosses over their heads. Everybody was fed, everybody had a home, nobody was oppressed,…
    • Anarchism only works as a rightist society.
  5. 1605.

    North Korean border controls should be less strict

    For

    • Ok,now during my research it explains that in South Korea..when people cross the border line illegally A punishment is given but most of these punishments are very violent and cruel. For example if parents or parent are caught trying to get across the punishment is that the…
    • Ok this needs to be fair ok no lies and you have to put resources to support your argument

    Against

    • Since my opponent has forfeited, I will not put forth any new information. Perhaps you should've made the debate topic more specific?
    • I agree that the punishments should be less strict, though that isn't what the debate is asking. At least with a strict border these harsh punishments will happen less often because it is harder to get out in the first place. There's not really anything we can do to change the…
  6. 1606.

    Barack Obama's views contradict libertarian principles

    For

    • As my opponent has already conceded my proposition, I extend all arguments. Please remember that since my opponent affirms that obama does in fact have views contradictory to libertarianism, I won the debate, as his duty was to argue CON- that obama does not have views…
    • My oponent affirmed my proposition by stating "Of course, Barack Obama has views that differ from Libertarianism" I will continue to argue why Libertarians should not support a socialist like Obama, however, him having a single issue contradictory to Libertarianism is enough to…

    Against

    • To define Libertarianism, Libertarianism is a broad spectrum of political philosophies, each sharing the common overall priority of maximum limitation of government combined with optimum possible individual liberty. Its goals, though often varied in detail, prioritize freedom…
  7. 1607.

    The current US government is not racist

    For

    • Racism exists, yes, but it is frowned upon by the GOVERNMENT.
    • Explain.

    Against

    • Not precisely. There are many governments populated by racists. David Duke, a popular Democratic senator, was a Klansman. White Nationalist politicians are making a rise. Plus, I wouldn't be surprised if some minorities got their way into political success if they screamed…
    • Laws need to be enforced. Since humans are the only people enforcing the law, racism can slip through particularly in historically racist areas.
  8. 1608.

    Immigration benefits host countries overall

    For

    • Americans and the American government choose to limit immigration to the United States strictly out of greed and racism. Individuals in other countries face horrible conditions and only enter the United States with the wish to help their families. The extreme courage and…
    • There should be no such thing as illegal immigration and those individuals already in the country that are labeled as illegal immigrants should be granted amnesty. Immigrants fuel the economy, whether or not they have entered the country legally. By entering the country,…

    Against

    • America should work to control its borders and halt the flow of illegal immigrants into this country. America should have no problem with those granted entrance to live in the nature, but there should be no room for illegals. There are more than ten million illegal immigrants…
    • You point out that prison numbers fluxuate and are not accurate and shouldn't be used to describe illegal immigrants as a whole. However, you are forgetting the point that illegal immigrants are concentrated in certain areas. They tend to settle near the border or in large…
  9. 1609.

    The Lebanon bombing is an impetus for a Western-planned Sunni-Shia war

    For

    • Thats okay.Might as well finish what I had typed on word.... The report also made mention of extensive US funding behind Hariri's faction, led then by Fouad Siniora, augmenting the creation of this militant force: "The United States has also given clandestine support to the…
    • Alright...A recent bombing in Beirut, Lebanon left high ranking security chief Brigadier General Wissam al-Hassan dead. Al-Hassan is described as "anti-Syrian." Before Al-Hassan's death was announced, and literally as bodies were still being pulled from the wreckage caused by…

    Against

    • Ahh, I'm am so sorry I had to FF. In the future let's debate something fun!
    • I have to forfet sorry.
  10. 1610.

    Same-sex marriage should be legal in all US states

    For

    • ff
    • ff

    Against

    • I would like to first state that I, in no way, dislike homosexuals. My feelings for them aren't for or against them as I truly see them as equal. I just have set beliefs about the institution of marriage and would enjoy a nice debate with another individual. I will be arguing…
  11. 1611.

    The words under God should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance

    For

    • "if God wanted it out he would of not made the pledge with it in there" First of all, you are switching your points every round. Please stay with the same one(s). Anyway, this is very, very subjective. How do you know what God wants? As an example, take drug dealers. Does God…
    • Sorry, but your belief in God has absolutely no relevance to this issue. Also, I note that you have dropped all of your "contentions" in favor of only one. Again you say that there is no reason the government should take it out, but I feel that I have sufficiently demonstrated…

    Against

    • They still should not take one nation under God out of the pledge of allegiance because if God wanted it out he would of not made the pledge with it in there.
    • I still think that they shouldn't take under God in the pledge of allegiance I guess the main reason is that I really believe in god and there is no reason that they should take it out and just because my argument is only two sentences... it still proves my point.
  12. 1612.

    Palestinian civilians are treated unfairly

    For

    • I guess that's all...
    • I'd like to debate this with you, but i can't really do that until you clarify your position.

    Against

    • What are your views on the war? ( Israel occupying gaza, killing innocent civilians)
  13. 1613.

    The United States should end aid to Middle Eastern governments other than Israel

    For

    • I think that you are right and that it is immoral to stand by and let this happen when we can help. At this time I think that it would be wise to pull aid out of these countries because though the render aid law was passed the people in the Middle East don't have many laws…
    • You are right even though it took a tremendous amount of time we did find Osama Bin Laden and guess where? In Pakistan where they harbored the terrorist for all that time. And yes I do believe that we should help ourselves before we help these other countries because it is…

    Against

    • Now For my Final word. Almost everyday thousands are dying in the middle east. These deaths is one of the greatest amounts of deaths that this worlds has seen since world war 2. Yes not everyone is living a charming life, but we are not living on dirt like the families in the…
    • In 1901 the "failure to render aid law" was passed. This was to make sure that when someone is in an accident, they need to stop and help that person in need. If we value the support for others, as shown in this law, we must value the support of other countries too. Yes that…
  14. 1614.

    Citizens should be allowed to own guns

    For

    • Citizens should be allowed to own guns. I am for the right to own firearms. The con of this debate must prove why we should not own firearms.
    • I also realize that you are pro firearms. I will use logic to reason with you. First I would like to point out the fact the guns can protect Innocent people for being killed as we see in this case here. . http://www.wsbtv.com... Also I would like to point out the fact that guns…

    Against

    • "I will use logic to reason with you. First I would like to point out the fact the guns can protect Innocent people for being killed as we see in this case here. http://www.wsbtv.com...; The V-tech Massacre ended up killing 32 people, wounding many others. The shooter legally…
    • "Citizens should be allowed to own guns. I am for the right to own firearms. The con of this debate must prove why we should not own firearms. " The instigator has the burden of proof. You are making the claim that "Citizens should be allowed to own guns. " Using this logic, I…
  15. 1615.

    Religion should have no place in US government

    For

    • Again, con has used the false equivalancy between religion and morality to enforce his belief that religion should be present in our national government. There is no direct proof that those who are religious have better social and moral development, in fact, as can be seen in…
    • My counterpart has made a false equivalency between morality and religiosity. To say that religion is the only thing stopping people from killing each other is absurd. In fact, countries that are more religious in general have more problems with morality than those who are non…

    Against

    • "The most hypocritical thing about con's argument was his/her statement that "respect for others freedom should be a priority." How is this possible if religion controls our government?" it's possible because even religous people can recognize the right to let others be. you…
    • pro says you can't use religion as evidence. for the most part, i agree. but that does n't mean you can't use your religion to inform your morality and thus the law. also, to be sure, you could use religion as evidence.... insofar as you can 'prove' a religion, it has that much…
  16. 1616.

    Current American political discourse undermines meaningful democratic deliberation

    For

    • "if you don't vote for my opponent your a douche" DON'T he advocated my victory.
    • I urge the voters/spectators to vote for a tie all the way down or not vote at all, seeing as this was only a chat that has turned into a think tank; unless you wanna vote for me ;) which you have sufficient reason to because last round I clearly stated that if he did not post…

    Against

    • AND my third keyvoter is GAME..there yea go argue that.....if you dont vote for my opponet then your a douche
    • If you want to conversate about it I would love to do that..add me on facebook its easier to chat on there... here's my link http://www.facebook.com...
  17. 1617.

    Barack Obama's presidency was a failure

    For

    • I clearly won
    • it would appear my opponent has forfeited this round so I win this one no new facts are needed exept Obama has don his best to help this country

    Against

    • Hmm.... Where do I start? Not only has our president drastically lowered our economy (opposite of what he's promised) he's also fought to change the constitution in that he can drop a drone or multiple drones on us whenever he wants to and for whatever reason he sees fit. Also,…
    • I posit that Mr. Obama's presidency has heeded little to no actual success. Think about this one and use actual evidence to support your theory.
  18. 1618.

    Guns are not the problem

    For

    • Yes, I'm focusing on homicides in my discussions, and I'm using several official unbiased sources to pull the numbers from while you are using sites which have an agenda against guns and are twisting the data or just lie on the data to fit their narrative. This is my point,…
    • The answer to your question is yes they do have an impact on deaths per year. A positive one. There are less deaths, and violent crime because we have guns. (as shown by the CDC, FBI, and England) Now let me respond with a question back to you. Do vehicles have an impact on the…

    Against

    • Your sources must be horrible because only 15,450 people die from ladders in the US and more than 30,000 die from guns. If you want an example to prove my point, Australia banned guns completely and what ended up happening is homicide rates went down by 59%, suicides went down…
    • You keep using one example from a couple of sources. One example does not prove your whole point. There are many other cases where people do die from guns. If you are denying that guns can actually kill people, there is a problem. Which do you think is more likely, a man…
  19. 1619.

    Even if the world could abolish nuclear weapons, it shouldn't

    For

    • I'll leave con conclude this debate.
    • My opponent has forfeited the last round because of internet issues. Any voters please ignore the forfeit, do not let it impact your vote.

    Against

    • Pro has argued several potential alternate use cases for existing nuclear weapon technology that I will group and rebut as; 1) Non-lethal (less lethal) offensive weapon (EMP)2) Defensive (missile shield)3) Offensive "smart" weaponry4) Meteor planetary protection 1) EMP.The…
    • I accept.
  20. 1620.

    The NSA's surveillance programs are effective enough to justify their use

    For

    • Again, you have left these statements without a link. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were actually reading a real CNN article/video. The following article is from October 7th, over three months after the article I provided last round. I can't find the exact CNN…
    • Thanks for the opportunity to debate this topic. And sorry for the late response; life happens.First of all, I'd like to see a source on your "0 attacks" statement. That just seems too negative to be true, but I'll be the first to admit it if you have a legitimate source.…

    Against

    • General Keith Alexander has been asked how many times the NSA has stopped terrorists attacks. Each time he has been asked the number has changed. According to CNN General Keith Alexander has said it started at 54 attacks in the world. Then only 13 in the united states. Now it…
    • The NSA has a budget of about 10billion dollars. Which has been used to stop 0 attacks. We are wasting money on them
  21. 1621.

    Hardworking undocumented immigrants should be granted citizenship

    For

    • I believe it is the right thing to do Their the hardest working people in america they work long difficult hours doing jobs no one else wants to for very low pay give them citizenship and let them help rebuild america This country was built on immigration For this debate their…
    • They are criminals, just the same as one who would work hard to rob a bank, or steal jewelery. So I conclude with this, why in any scope of the word; by any definition is it ever right to reward those who break the law? this is what you stated, and this is why I used Rosa Park…

    Against

    • This is an interesting resolution; one which I'm sure many Americans have though about at one time or another. When we begin to look at illegal immigration we can see and weight several things; and at the finish we realize this. It is by no means right to give something to…
    • Again, my opponent avoids the topic and does not cover the topic at hand. My opponent has instead focused the entirety of this debate on semantics arguments. and off topic, pathos observations based on African-American slaves. First of I will again clarify this- The controversy…
  22. 1622.

    An atheist president would be acceptable to the public

    For

    • Ah, I apologize for not being specific. I am arguing for someone like an agnostic atheist or someone like Hemant Mehta, who has a blog here: http://www.patheos.com...; I agree, it is certainly a waste of time to argue whether a militant atheist (or a militant anything for that…
    • I extend my arguments, I hope con will be back.

    Against

    • Your website about 'pantheos' doesn't exist. Error 404. .. so yeah! ! Here's my rebuttals. 1A. The Bible My opponent: "I live under the assumption that the Bible was written by man and not inspired by a higher deity. " Off the top of my head, here's a verse claiming that the…
    • So you're not a militant atheist, I see. If a militant atheist was president many things would go wrong for our country, don't you think? Religions would be cast out, etc., (but I don't see how we'd even get as far as electing a militant atheist). Are you arguing that an…
  23. 1623.

    George W. Bush was a good president

    For

    • You declared yourself the winner of the debate in the second round, I was merely pointing out that neither you nor I get to decide the winner. In your future debates, I suggest you try and remove your emotions from your arguments, and cite more factual sources. You've listed a…
    • Slow down there policydebategod…we still have 2 more rounds. When I built Debate.org, I decided not to run it like a dictatorship, but rather by the will of the community. They are the ones who get to decide the winner with their votes, not you or me. Furthermore, I'm not sure…

    Against

    • George Bush has destroyed our nation. 1. He implimented No Child Left Behind, overcrowding our good schools and still leaving our bad schools to be bad. 2. He created the Iraq War for the purpose of finding weapons of mass destruction, stopping terrorism, and promoting…
    • - nobody said that you or i would decide the debate. - "He…created the Patriot Act, making our constitution invalid," "He failed to do ONE good thing for America." These statements do nothing more than give away your clear hatred for a man you don't even know. + My job as a…
  24. 1624.

    Gun ownership is an absolute right that should not be regulated

    For

    • No, those sources were not there in round 2, you came up with them now, go see round 2. Also, even if you could prove that Ronald Reagan said that, it is irrelevant, just because Reagan thought something doesn't mean that I have to, or that he is necessarily right. It's like if…
    • No, you did not cite any sources, besides, even if you did, your source needs to provide a place and time where Reagan said that. In response to your first argument, you assume that it is the government's job to decide what rights the people should have, and that the government…

    Against

    • Wow... simply just.. wow. I'll make this easy for you. First, go to round two of my debate. Next, scroll down to the bottom where it says "Sources:". Guess what? My sources for my round 2 are there. Who knew? I would like to advise the voters to not pay attention to my…
    • First of all, I would like to state that my opponent is completely ignorant in looking at my sources. I have shown a plethora of sources, yet my opponent somehow believes that I haven't put down any at all. So, seeing that my opponent is completly lazy when it comes to simply…
  25. 1625.

    The Democratic Party reflects Christian values more than the Republican Party

    For

    • "If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, then either we've got to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that he commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and that we just don't want…
    • My opponent's quotes will be in bold. I. Help the sick & feed the poorIt is important to note that Jesus Christ never sent someone sick or someone homeless away on the principle of self-reliance. Instead, that's exactly what the Republican party's intentions are. The difference…

    Against

    • My opponent's statement, "The Bible claims that those whose dependent on the taking of money from others should be made more self reliant, which what the Republican party attempted to do through their reforms to welfare," is not only irrelevant in this discussion, it's…
    • I'm going to go through my opponent's prior arguments systematically, and then offer up a few affirmative arguments of my own. I. Help the Sick and Feed the Poor What is important to understand about conservative ideology is that it doesn't just hold that social welfare…
  26. 1626.

    Progressive support for Islam benefits the far right

    For

    • After Con's second comment and objection in the comments section, I changed the title & first argument. He by his own choice then accepted the debate. Con has chosen to do as he did in our last debate, & rather than debate a position he can not defend, he goes to semantics to…
    • ----- Con:Not some progressives, not most progressives, "Progressives" which must mean "ALL" progressives. ----- Not actually. Seeing tha Con wants semantics rather than to try & defend an indefensable position of the left in general, let's play semantics. Technically, I didn't…

    Against

    • Some progressives support the positions that some Muslims hold that some might say are right wing. That's a silly and trivial point- it is conceded but as a topic of debate it is worthless. If the pro is actually interested in debates, learning to frame topics in a realistic…
    • Before the debate I asked the pro to clarify her terms, as the title was too broad to decide whether a defence was possible, or whether it was even a position I agreed with. She refused to do so, simply giving a childish " debate me and fund out." I have now found out, and she…
  27. 1627.

    The United States should go to war with Iran

    For

    • Well, this is my third time I debated this, and it is the third times my oppentent has forfeited. " I strongly disagree with you and no one has been able to argue coherently against you, which is disappointing." This is the best because you say you won't forfeit, but you don't…
    • Hello Thank you for the challenge and please no forfeiting. IN your argument, you just say that Iran has no need for war, because their economy relies on foreign oil. That doesn't mean anything. President Ahmadinejad isn't looking for war. He has said "death to Israel."…

    Against

    • The MSNBC article and Christian Science Monitor article talk about how Iran has been rounding up and investigating Al Qaeda members in Iran; the Telegraph link takes you to the website's main page; and all the Time article says is that the Iranian government allowed Al Qaeda…
    • I've seen your previous arguments and must say I strongly disagree with you and no one has been able to argue coherently against you, which is disappointing. Therefore, I have decided to challenge you to this debate. One of the oldest problems in United States foreign policy is…
  28. 1628.

    Border walls are an effective way to control immigration

    For

    • The korean demilitarization zone is a lot different than illegal immigration. You are also forgetting that MANY more people are stopped than crossed. The illegal border crossings in Israel fell over 94%. " Just about anyone can be welcomed into America's borders. " Criminals,…
    • Im going to keep this nice and short Its an issue- Illegal border crossings are set to be all-time high for 2019 as well as aliens going in and taking jobs and killing good Americans, Families going to the border is also a problem but 800 million dollars are going to…

    Against

    • I will keep it short as well. The North and South Korean border, Knowm has the demilitarized zone, Is arguably the most defended borer crossing yet people defect and illegally cross the border by the thousands. Armmed guards and millions of square miles of land mines beat a…
    • As Con I will show that there is no reasonable reason, Or point to a wall along the Southern Border of the United States. Good luck to Pro
  29. 1629.

    Teachers should be allowed to carry concealed guns at school

    For

    • You don't need to find the key to the cabinet if it is a key code lock like i said. You should have read that sentence more carefully. You also state you have a few reasons but say 1 reason. Pulling off a taser may be faster but many people train themselves to not be affected…
    • Teachers will have the guns locked up i don't think the kids will be able to steal the gun and use it. ESPECIALLY when the gun is not loaded when it is locked up. The can be anywhere else like the teachers coat, or there bags or there locked drawers. They cant take a gun if…

    Against

    • 2. If there is a police officer then there is no reason to have tasers or guns. 3. If you have two tasers you can use them every 2 seconds. 4. if there is a police officer bad people are less likely to attempt to do something bad. 5. My school has one police officer and there…
    • There is still no reason to use guns instead of tasers or a police officer even if a student cannot reach the gun. I have a few reasons as to why. 1. Pulling a taser off of a belt is way easier and faster than trying to find the key that unlocks the cabinet and loading the gun…
  30. 1630.

    A democratic world government should rule all nations

    For

    • Can you give me a counter argument against this one What would you think of a planet which there is no nation that can declare war on another. Where the riches of the world is shared with each other. It could be like the USA where all nations are states and they elect a…
    • What would you think of a planet wich there is no nation that can declare war on antoher. Were the riches of the world is shared with each other. It could be like the USA were all nations are states and they elect a president.

    Against

    • Greetings! I will be happy to accept the Con side of this debate (though I'd be happier if debate.
    • Why, thank you. I have to admit, that's quite an unexpected end to a debate, lol, but, it certainly did serve to make the debate even more unique than it already was! A pleasure debating you, sir. :)
  31. 1631.

    Protesting should be limited for certain causes

    For

    • Yes some old rules do still apply such as no murder and thievery but some laws are out dated such as right to bare arms so I think that the U.S. should change some of it's laws, also several reported cases show that people DO protest in residential areas as well as they do make…
    • Well we should be able to change the constitution because in is out dated but that was off topic, still back to the topic i was talking about, would you like it if a bunch of people were protesting right in front of your house at midnight, or would you like a bunch of…

    Against

    • "but some laws are out dated such as right to bare arms so I think that the U.S. should change some of it's laws". People should be allowed to bear arms, legs and tumies. People also should be allowed to bear firearms. This is not a gun debate. If you want to debate guns, then…
    • "Well we should be able to change the constitution because it is out dated" Just because a law is old does not mean it has to change. The 10 commandments had the commandment, "Thou shall not steal". This is an old law. Should it be replaced? No. Laws should not be judged on the…
  32. 1632.

    Long-term military interventions are usually futile

    For

    • To clarify what I said was "The cost in lives of the war exceeds the number of people killed on 9/11". See I said people. The use of "people" is generic and includes all lives both civilian, military, firemen, and police. When I later said, "To justify that high number of…
    • Sorry about the mishap. I know it's frustrating. Ok, so my opponent concedes that the war is not stopping - Attempts of Islamic terror on our homeland- jihadis from crossing our borders- "home grown" terrorism- the ever present threat of Islamic terror inside the USHe concedes…

    Against

    • Was a good run. Had some trouble do to character limitations so I hope I was able to get my point across effectively. We shall see. "We have as I pointed out, got more soldiers killed in this war than on 9/11 and add on top of that the extreme financial strain""I would ask that…
    • All right good round Pro. Going to keep me on my toes here I see.Pro states that I concede these points that the war has not stopped - "home grown" terrorism"- "the ever present threat of Islamic terror inside the US" Not really. What Pro doesn't place here is that there is a…
  33. 1633.

    Media should publish details of terrorist attacks

    For

    • extend...............
    • extend....

    Against

    • So I'm doing a debate with my school and the model is that this house would not publish acts of terror, I am a proposing this model and personally I feel that by publishing acts of terror it is causing an unnecessary uproar and panic in society, I also feel like it is shining a…
  34. 1634.

    The Affordable Care Act should be repealed

    For

    • I wish to apologize to my opponent, but due to school and other activities, I have not had the time I initially thought I had to complete this debate. I would like to do a video debate with you on this topic if you wish, though for now I must concede.
    • Fixing Healthcare the Right Way My opponent made a few good points in this debate and I do agree that healthcare needs to be reformed; however, I believe ObamaCare is NOT the correct way to do so. In this round, I will proceed to give my way on reforming the healthcare system.…

    Against

    • Life happens man! Thank you again, and audience please give me the win (arguments extended)
    • Drops:My opponent advocated for a free-market system of healthcare, but dropped my point that it does not cover everyone, and because of medical ethics differing from free-market philosophy, the free-market cannot be used here. Effectively negating all of his points. I shall…
  35. 1635.

    Same-sex marriage should be illegal in the United States

    For

    • I want everyone to see how my opponent hasn't rebuttled and twists my words. My opponent just said "the fact is that according to him, procreation is the definition of natural." I said "First off procreation does not make something natural" My opponent twisted my words and just…
    • My opponent stated "B. Many marriages are unnatural, yet still legal. Using my opponent's criteria marriages between the elderly, the infertile, and those that just don't have to have children are all unnatural." First off procreation does not make something natural. Man and…

    Against

    • Contention I: Naturality My opponent totally goes backward on his one sentence srgument from round one. He said, "Gay couples cannot reproduce together so this in a way is defiant to nature." He doesn't respond at all to my arguments and basically just goes on preaching for a…
    • Thanks to my opponent for the response. I'll be going over his three points and adding a few of my own. The definition presented is totally correct. Keep in mind that it is about the state legally recognizing the union and not any religious organization. This will come up…
  36. 1636.

    Republicans are inconsistent in defending individual liberties

    For

    • "Do you realize how unethical drugs and prostitution is?" Yes I do. I also think adultery is unethical. I think swingers are a bizarre bunch too. I'll admit I don't enjoy seeing two gay people kiss in public (not because I consider it unethical, but because I'm not used to it).…
    • Good point. And thankfully there are a growing number of Republicans who are becoming more libertarian in their tolerance of alternative lifestyles. But I believe the majority of Republicans are still social conservatives. The enormous backlash among republicans toward John…

    Against

    • Quote: "I believe you are correct in citing that many crimes are committed by people on drugs. But I am pretty sure the majority of drug users are not a threat to their fellow citizens-- especially when they partake in the privacy of their own homes." In the privacy of their…
    • Quote: "If someone on my block is snorting cocaine while waiting for a prostitute to arrive at his home, he is not violating any of my individual rights. If he comes over to my place and murders me, he has crossed the line into behavior that violates my right to live." Do you…
  37. 1637.

    There should be a Christian nation

    For

    • Continued.
    • On to the next round.

    Against

    • Firstly I would like to complement my opponent for crafting an interesting and pleasant argument. Now onto my opponents mistakes in his opening remarks. Point 1. The fact of the matter is that Bin Laden's official written decoration of war against America and the West does not…
    • I accept this debate, and will be arguing against the proposal that 'there should be a christian state'. I wish my opponent good luck, and look forward to an interesting and enjoyable debate. I would firstly like to point out several flaws in my opponents opening remarks. 1)…
  38. 1638.

    Pan-Islamism would be harmful if implemented

    For

    • RebuttalYour first assumption is that you can use history to justify modern claims, which is certainly not the case. As technology, social structures, economic theories, and overall human life progresses, so does governemntal structure. A theocracy is clearly not a working and…
    • I will abstain this round since you have not posted an argument the round before.

    Against

    • I will use this round to finish off my rebuttals alongside my conclusive arguments. R1: " It is inarguable that Muslim nations, representing either a Muslim majority population or a Islamic theocratic government rank high on the corruption index and the human rights violation…
    • To make up for my previous absences, I'll merge my rebuttals alongside my opening arguments. Argument /Rebuttal: Historical Caliphates In order for one to answer whether or not a theocratic government could work in application. It would be best to see previous examples of…
  39. 1639.

    Morality should not be a deciding factor in American politics

    For

    • Round 1 will be for opening statements only. Morality - conformity to the rules of right conduct. Should - implying a binding obligation. Clarifications: Question of the resolution: Should morality play a deciding role in influencing political considerations and decisions?…
    • One last thing; since this round is the last, remember that my opponent may not bring up any new arguments/evidence that have not been previously mentioned; thus, if she brings up some new argument or evidence out of the blue, it may be extremely valid, but you cannot vote on…

    Against

    • I apologize for missing the third round; I am in the process of moving and was not able to get online and post my argument in time... Back to the debate! Pro opens by claiming, "We change our views from time to time, making moral consistency in the US quite impossible."…
    • Re: Morality is Inconsistent and Unnecessary Pro notes that before the war, Christians used the Bible to justify the practice of slavery, and after the war used quotes from the Bible to condemn slavery. He argues that this proves an inconsistency in morality. However, here Pro…
  40. 1640.

    The US is justified in taking military action against Iran

    For

    • Initially, I would like to point out the obvious flaws of my opponents case. Duplicity is completely irrelevant to this debate. As cruel as it may be, the US government has no obligation to the Egyptian or Uzebekistani people. The social contract obligates that the US…
    • Whether or not the United States would be justified in pursuing military options against Iran is a contentious debate. To determine justification in this case, two questions must be considered. Does the United States need to engage in any form of action? Are military options…

    Against

    • My opponents brings up many good points but has obvious flaws in his case. His first contention is clearly negated by my first two contentions. I would redictate these points but it would be pointless due to the following information. Continuing on, his case is structured so…
    • Recently, the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran reported if President Bush were to lead a military assault on Iran it would be an impeachable offense. Clearly, the US would not be justified in pursuing military options against Iran. My partner and I urge a con ballot based…
  41. 1641.

    Governments should grant amnesty to illegal immigrants

    For

    • I gave no specific referral to the United States. 'Amnesty' for illegal immigrants refers to all nations, including Middle Eastern nations. Nevertheless, I will try to cover all aspects of your argument. 'The US Code, Title 8, is very specific about what constitutes 'illegal…
    • Hi, My debate will be focused on a recent issue, illegal immigrant amnesty. For this debate, I will be affirming. I will be arguing why we should grant illegal immigrants amnesty. The negating will answer why we should not. A few terms- 'THW'- This House would 'Amnesty' -…

    Against

    • Thank you for your rebuttal. "I gave no specific referral to the United States. 'Amnesty' for illegal immigrants refers to all nations, including Middle Eastern nations. " Since you spoke originally of current conversation, I assumed you were talking about the US. I cannot…
    • The US Code, Title 8, is very specific about what constitutes 'illegal alien' and the laws concerning the hiring, aiding, housing, etc. of those who are here illegally. If for no other reason, the term 'illegal' should declare why those who are here without proper documentation…
  42. 1642.

    The United States should ban all immigration

    For

    • I can no longer put off debating you so I'm going to make this worth the wait. Have you noticed that literally everyone you linked is of a Hispanic descent? Also, your first link doesn't work but enough about that. Let's discuss why your points are rubbish. 1. 1st off, the…
    • 1. I'm not saying that all illegal immigrants don't pay tax, I'm saying that they have a lifestyle that is criminal by our standards. For example, Central Americans (Mexico,El Salvador,Guatemala and Honduras especially) are responsible for 74% of all illegal immigrants in the…

    Against

    • 1) http://www.politifact.com... Valdez stated that "The undocumenteds are no more likely to commit crimes than our native-born citizens.", then later in the article, they state that Nation Research has shown that illegal immigrants commit less crime than the native population.…
    • 1) I agree, I could have picked a better site then CNN, however immigration.procon.org verified this fact and included that all illegal immigrants pay some tax of some sort that is automatically deducted from their pay by their employers, from the store in the form of sales…
  43. 1643.

    Ending all explicit government is the only way to permanently end war

    For

    • Other than extinction, we cannot avoid war so long as we allow governments to continue to exist. Government is the only institution thats needs and is capable of waging war. The people never war. Rioting is the closest thing to war people directly engage in, with lynch mobs and…
    • "No, America is a powerful nation, yet we attack other nations and pick sides and help fight almost immediately, physically." I( don't see what this has to do with anything but I'll answer it anyway. We haven't been to war since WW2, during which we annihilated nazi germany as…

    Against

    • "People left to their own devices will not systematically exterminate an enemy." I do not believe this is true. People, if left to their own devices, would do whatever they wanted. A state of violent anarchy would come into play. If we leave people alone to believe what they…
    • War is not annihilation. It can be. But we are in a War now, and even though it looks like we are out to get our enemies, we have more resourceful things in mind. "In the absence of a need for central infrastructure no government can exist." Okay, then let me put it this way.…
  44. 1644.

    Children should be raised by the state rather than parents

    For

    • Rebuttals1. Early Childhood Development My opponent mentions orphanages and institutional care being given to the children but that is not necessarily how such a system would work. Children raised by the state just means that they are being raised by an entity that is part of…
    • 1. Cultural UnityOne of the biggest benefits of having the state raise children would be the creation of a unitary culture. All children would be raised in a homogeneous cultural identity. One of the biggest sources of strife and conflict in modern society arises from differing…

    Against

    • The concept of the state raising children is an interesting one, but ultimately a fundamentally flawed one for the following reasons: Early Childhood development The first years of a child's life is paramount in their long term development. The close, intimate and frequent…
    • This sounds like a Con job. .. I mean a job for Con. .. .. ..
  45. 1645.

    Opposing capitalism is necessary to be an anarchist

    For

    • Really sorry about the forfeit. Rebuttals Premise 2 "A pizza oven is capital. The pizza ingredients are not. While ingredients are inputs, they do not count as capital because they are not durable. The person who owns the pizza oven is, then, a "capitalist". " Capital is…
    • 1. One must oppose forcefulness to be an anarchist. 2. Capitalism and freedom are incompatible 3.Capitalism necessitates the use of force. C. One needs to oppose Capitalism to be an anarchist. Premise 1 The "Forcefulness" that anarchist oppose is not limited to the state…

    Against

    • Well, it is unfortunate that my opponent was unable to provide rebuttals.Extend all arguments.
    • Thank you for submitting your Opening Statements, MaesterAemon. These are some intriguing arguments. I did have to take some time determining the best route to take, in regards to my rebuttals. P1: "One must oppose forcefulness to be an anarchist." I will grant this, as P1 for…
  46. 1646.

    Pakistan would win another all-out war with India

    For

    • Thank you, Con.REBUTTALS:Both my opponents claims are only for Pakistan and India ALONE. He is forgetting the key to winning the war: China's support. I will have to prove that China would get involved, and I plan to do so. What my opponent does not understand is that China has…
    • Thanks for accepting, Con!KASHMIR CONFLICTLets take a look at the Kashmir region, where India and Pakistan have had conflicts in for the past 60 years. Now, why would they be fighting over this land? Mainly because India claims it, but over 60% of the population is Muslim [1].…

    Against

    • Yay... I guess.WarDebator, don't close your account... :(
    • Argument I: Pakistan v IndiaPro's case is redherring. My stats were not for Pakistan and India alone. I blatantly gave stats for US v China as well. That being said, purposefully misrepresenting my case is fallacious. And Pro is right, China has aided Pakistan before... With…
  47. 1647.

    Pakistan is a terror hub and a threat to the whole world

    For

    • Yes Pakistan is Terror Hub for all Terrorist around the world. ISI help terrorists to spread terror .

    Against

    • Behold, thy period of voting is upon us my Lords.
    • Due to Pro forfeiting this round, I forward my arguments from last round in case the Pro returns and wants to continue the debate.
  48. 1648.

    George W. Bush's wars were a mistake

    For

    • jorge is bad because of giving the arabs guns and ammunition and plus he was the one who then said that theyve got weapons and attcked them so that they could get the oil from the country to become even more rich driving the arabs poor./then jorge bush also bombed the 2…

    Against

    • Well I don't mean to be rude, but my oppenent has still failed to offer and real evidence for his totally absurd point of view
    • Again, my opponent has proved that his argument was totally unsubstantiated. 100 words 100 words 100 words
  49. 1649.

    Democracy has failed as a system of government

    For

    • Defense of R2:Specifications:I referred to a specific type of monarchy (hereditary and based on private property) that historically existed and thus cannot be considered unrealistic. This was specifically permitted in the rules. The Wikipedia page was for supplemental…
    • On the Definition of Democracy:Con's definition of democracy is invalid because he fiats in the assumption that people will actually control the government. This is equivalent to me stipulating that the monarch will be a nice person. His definition describes monarchy just as…

    Against

    • A Defense of Round 2:Definition of Democracy: Pro asserts that my definition of democracy is invalid because it assumes people will "actually" control the government. This is a cynical contention. A democracy is a government where the citizenry control the acts of governance.…
    • Specifications of the Monarchical System Pro's definition of monarchy has very little to do with his given source. Nowhere in the Wikipedia article (which is not the most credulous source, since he can edit it) is there mention of "private property", which is integral to the…
  50. 1650.

    The West should militarily intervene in Syria

    For

    • I think that the UN has let to much people die at the hands of the murderous President Bashar al Assad. It is now time to throw China and Russia a side and to intervene with a No-Fly Zone. In any case the war that President Assad has created will reverberate the Middle East and…

    Against

    • Daw thats sad. Im willing to try again sometime with a larger time limit
    • Daw thats sad. Im willing to try again sometime with a larger time limit

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.