Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 23
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1101.
Japan should remove Article 9 from its constitution
For
- Apologies for the previous forfeit. I will try and merge my rebuttals and my conclusive arguments in this round.R1:" Sovereigns Self-limit. Pro defines "sovereignty" as "the authority of a state to govern itself or another state." Using this definition, any limitation on a…
- Premise: War as a Sovereign Right Sovereignty is defined by Oxford as "the authority of a state to govern itself or another state. " (Source: . http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...) This means that by nature, a government has various rights and powers to allow it to maintain…
Against
- Thanks, Uther!OVERVIEWMy overview is dropped. Pro still has failed to clearly show which links correspond to which claims, which makes it hard to verify his assertions.ARGUMENTSPRMS. War = Sovereign Right1. Rights Can be Waived. This point is dropped by Pro; please extend it.…
- Extend.
- 1102.
Ireland should join the United Kingdom
For
- I'll answer it with one answer. The central government of the U.K. is in London. I, an imperialist? No. That's your perspective just yours. That's why people think England controls everything. The central government can only be in location and they chose it to be in London.…
- The reason why you believe Ireland is ruled by England is that the central government is in England. Anglophobia will never be accepted in Ireland. Are you Anglophobic? Anglophobia is a tactic Irish nationalists use to convince the Irish that Britons are bad. Well, not quite.…
Against
- I am not anti-England, I am anti-Imperialist. You, my friend, are an Imperialist. Ireland doesn't want to be want to be controlled, or ruled, or owned. Ireland wants to be Ireland. Every act the Irish took against the English was in response to English aggression. You still do…
- Genes do not matter at all. The English do not have to be different genes to be the enemies of Ireland. Someone's genes do not determine what actions they will make. That is everyone's choice. Throughout history, England has oppressed Ireland. Freedom is good, and even if many…
- 1103.
The two-party system should be abolished
For
- First of all, my opponent seems to think that I support more than two parties. This is not the case. I agree that more parties would lead to less efficiency. It stands to reason, however, that if more parties make it less efficient then no parties would be more efficient. As to…
- First off let me apologize to my opponent for the short debate. I haven't been on this site for a while and I forgot that the acceptance counted as a round. With that out of the way, my opponent challenged me to come up with a replacement for the two party system. I think it…
Against
- My opponents alternative is to have no political parties at all. But, the problem is, the framers absolutely hated political parties. They despised them. The constitutions intent was to set up a government, not set up political parties. But, they formed anyway because Alexander…
- My opponent still has not provided another system that will replace the two party political system, a more democratic system does not mean there are more than two major political parties. Furthermore, what is a "regular democracy?" C1. The United States has had a two party…
- 1104.
Liberals are no less able than conservatives
For
- The fear of a terrorist attack from Muslim refugees is somewhat irrationally placed, only 20 out of 3.25 million refugees in general have attempted terrorism, with only three deaths (The deaths are from Cuban refugees). Very very few terrorists are refugees, in fact a terrorist…
- Though this argument is because of a misspelling, I will argue on my misspelling. Though many liberals exhibit cognitive dissonance, so do many republicans though not always to the extent. Liberals have a heart they just don't always think to back it up with their head, for…
Against
- "Even terrorists are still people and therefore capable of both change and morality."False. Terrorists can be given chances? Are they not threats to society? Utterly ridiculous. See this is why I see Liberals as less intelligent that conservatives,So are child molesters to be…
- "Muslim Refugees. Refugees are people that are fleeing almost certain death Muslim or not, if we show them kindness even the few unknown extremes are able to change"The problem is the refugees and Islam. The liberals must seem to want the refugees, yet they are not aware of the…
- 1105.
The United States is not the greatest country in the world
For
- Hello, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to this debate. I will be presenting the rules and requirements of the debate rounds. Round 1: Con may introduce and start with his constructive arguments. Round 2: Pro starts with its rebuttals/Con starts with rebuttals. Round 3: Pro writes…
Against
- v
- Victory
- 1106.
Censorship is unnecessary in modern society
For
- I would like to state that while I may have used Wikipedia for my arguement, it is, however, a verifiable source. If you disagree, please see: -Lundqvist, J.. "More pictures of Iranian Censorship". Retrieved on August 2007-01-21. -Bradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. Del Rey Books.…
- First off, I would like to say. .. MAN that was a lot of arguement on the moral side. Does censorship apply strongly to your own personal morals? I came across this interesting article on the internet while reading my daily Church Times. .. I would like to note a large quote…
Against
- Might I also add that Wikipedia can be edited by ANYONE who enters the site. While your opening argument (and mine) were credible, Wikipedia as a whole is not a very credible source, considering it can be edited.…
- And credits to Wikipedia for my opponents ENTIRE opening argument: <http://en.wikipedia.org...; Anyways, moving on =) =========================== Morals is a broad term. For this reason, I will define 'morals' as told by <http://www.dictionary.com...; Morals 1.of, pertaining…
- 1107.
The US should fix its southern border
For
- You need to look at the sources of the fox. News article. If you can read it you will notice it got information from sources that are not bias. So look if you just look at the statistics you will see that they point to problems and we need to fix them. Fox News is bias to the…
- The statistics that l laid out in round 3 totally negate your point that a majority of the immigrants aren't criminals. The statistics are startling and that shows that we need to either fix ICE or let no one in until we are sure they are no threat. Look this will help fight…
Against
- Fox News is known for lying so I wouldn't trust them 95 percent of statsitcs are made up did you know that? I just made up that statsistic as well!
- Fox news is, brace yourself, a biased source. My sources weren't biased except for Mythopedia which is a liberal organization that is focused on the truth instead of conservative lies. Sorry but you still haven't proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that we should fix our southern…
- 1108.
Right-leaning politics are better than left-leaning
For
- Yes every person has as much a likely chance to die because we have no control over that. Like you said only God does, but I would like to say that if God is killing lefties at a younger age like your argument suggests wouldn't that mean that he favors the other. Indeed this is…
- .. Righties are better than lefties for but another reason too. So you know how it has been proved that women live longer than men. .. Well righties have been proved to live longer than lefties. I ask how you think this is not a better thing. To live longer due to you using…
Against
- Um, okay. This was fun! :)
- Uh, okay. I agree with what you said. But in my opinion, I don't have a favorite hand, but it's kind of rude to just go up to a lefty( If you are right handed) and say" Oh I'm better than you because I was born this way" or " Ha ha oh your a lefty." or something like that. And…
- 1109.
The United States should increase its involvement against ISIS
For
- Of course in the long term it would make sense that it only works with political solutions. However, Iraq seemingly has little to no resistance against ISIS. The people who are doing this do not care or have any reason to listen to us. A political solution to this problem is…
- I agree that it would be inevitable that we would have civilian casualties. But, that is hardly an argument when you consider the alternative. ISIS is a violent extremist group that is tearing through the middle east with little consideration for human life. Those who are of…
Against
- In an effort to remain fair, I have attempted to limit this round to rebuttals only. You write that the inevitability of civilian casualties is hardly an argument when the alternative is considered. The alternative being that ISIS continues its 'rampage' in Iraq? The civilian…
- In the interest of fairness, I have placed no rebuttals to your round 2 argument, and unless you disagree, I believe we should limit round 3 to rebuttals only. I agree that the US should make humanitarian efforts in Iraq in order to help those displaced by ISIS. However,…
- 1110.
Civil disobedience in the modern United States is morally justified
For
- Truthfully, I've just spent the past thirteen hours at work and I'll be back at work bright and early for another grueling twelve hours. I apologize to my opponent and to anyone who may have been following the debate, but I will not be submitting my closing arguments.
- Rebuttal 1 - Stifling Debate A) I do not consider my opponent's accusation of hearsay to be a personal attack, but rather a mischaracterization given that I am making informed arguments "based on sound reasoning or information and/or having information especially as a result of…
Against
- I spent a great deal of time this last weekend thinking about this debate, and how to respond. Here it goes. Pro concludes "Conclusion: A mischaracterization that is stifling our debate over Civil Disobedience and hypocritical given that you don't abide by the same standard…
- Rebuttal 1: "Informed?" In round two, I mentioned that much of my opponents statements were "hearsay" being defined as "unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one"s direct knowledge." My opponent seems to have taken this statement as…
- 1111.
Socialism would solve America's major problems
For
- I have accepted your argument. Now, I want to clarify my position on this debate: I am NOT advocating a complete Socialist revisioning of America: You won't see concepts such as advertising and private ownership of land disappear off the face of the Earth. I am of the opinion…
- "We can't support people laying around and do nothing"I make an argument for Universal Health Care and you resort to making judgements of people you've never met in your life. I see how it is, though I'm not really surprised."we have to think of practicality, not taking…
Against
- No stealing from the rich to elevate the poor isn't the answer, it is a complete mockery of freedom and takes away from those more fortunate and gives money to the poor in exchange for taking the country over.
- The words " it turns out when you call people racist, sexist, bigoted when they are in your own political party they feel rejected like they don't belong because they feel shitty, people will vote in direct opposition to what they once called their own party" was not directed…
- 1112.
The voting age should be lowered below 18
For
- 1. My parents don't vote, even after I showed them why they should vote. So technicality I am not represented plus parents have to munch control over another person's life. I study social studies daily (I want to be a social studies teacher), so if you are saying that I can't…
- That is a biased and ageism view point. We want to be engaged and change the world for the better. Teens can think differently than their parents. All teens think differently than their parents, (I do it all the time). We all are created equal! Is it fair that we don't have a…
Against
- 1. Parents have the correct amount of control on their kids lives, parents have to raise their children so they decide on what is best for them. 2. Okay? You study social studies, big deal so do a lot of other people, but just because you study it does not give you the…
- OKAY 1. first off, ageism only really applies to older people and seniors, and no where in my first speech act was I ageist, if anything you are being ageist by generalizing teens 2. Even if you think differently from your parents "all the time", your political views are…
- 1113.
Anarcho-capitalism is the only effective route to a stateless society
For
- Round 1: Statement of claim and acceptance only Round 2: Argument Round 3: Rebuttal Round 4: Conclusions Claim: The only way to effectively organize and distribute goods and services in absence of the state is to have as capitalist society. True capitalism actually requires…
Against
- Extension
- Extension
- 1114.
Progress cannot belong to one political spectrum
For
- OK, as you said in your argument, "Liberal means all men are created equal and Conservative means all men are not created equal." I think you're wrong about that, and I'll prove it real quick: The Pro-Life is not about misogyny, as much as the Left may claim this is the case.…
- Okay, so to oversimplify your argument, the basic idea is that progress can be defined as what is beneficial, better than what was used in the past. But then again, what is beneficial? Is progress by your definition of the word is always a good thing, what is progress? A…
Against
- Ok, as you said in your argument, "Liberal means all men are created equal and Conservative means all men are not created equal." Nope. That's wrong. I said that Left-Wing means all men are created equal, Right-Wing means all men are not created equal. My opponent is conflating…
- Okay, so to oversimplify your argument, the basic idea is that progress can be defined as what is beneficial, better than what was used in the past. A little too oversimplified. Two essential components to the political definition of progress are that the means of advancement…
- 1115.
The United States should split into multiple countries
For
- Vote for me!
- He or she must have given up because of my superior debating skills. Not really, but I do hate it when they forfeit. At the very least post a short response. Maybe they will respond for the next round.
Against
- I just decided to quit because your views are not realistic and it is hard to debate with someone like that.
- OK just no 1. USA:united states of america. we are all united together not separated into groups 2. there can not be peace between these people if they all move into where the political views of any party is. They will have war because you can separate people with different…
- 1116.
Monarchy is a good form of government
For
- My opponent seems to be a bit confused on a number of my arguments. So I would like to clarify: what I was trying to say is that monarchy does not automatically equal totalitarianism. One cannot argue that a monarchy is oppressive because not all of them are. Equally, one…
- Having shown that the ethical issues about monarchy are not so straight forward and are not all bad news, I would like to elaborate on the benefits brought by a monarchy. Matthew Feeney, a British-American writer, once pointed out that, compared to other European nations;…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited this round but since this round was essentially meant to be skipped I'll use this round to thank him for a wonderful debate.
- So now that we have reached the ultimate round of this debate, I will sum up everything in my case and tie up loose ends, if there are any. PRO's failure to meet the BOP: As the person making the claim PRO had the entirety of the Burden of proof to uphold the resolution…
- 1117.
The US should adopt progressive initiatives
For
- Initiatives, were a concept created by Sun Yat Sen, my hero, and later advocated for by the Bull Moose Party. An initiative, is a reform designed to coincide with representative democracy. The citizen, will essentially, have the abillity to enact votes based on majority…
Against
- Thanks!
- Extend my arguments; hopefully Pro can respond next round.
- 1118.
Allowing the world's strongest superpowers to control global affairs will strengthen the world
For
- It is true that African slavery played an important role in the advancement of most European countries and the USA. To a larger extent,however, it was the innovation of the Europeans that won the day. For example, the Europeans designed new and better forms of infrastructure…
- With all the economic failures that are dogging the world ( especially in Africa), it would prove fruitful to allow the world's strongest superpowers eg. USA and Britain to control the world's resources. Observing how effectively these countries have used their own resources,…
Against
- European InnovationAs I think I already explained last round the reason Europeans were able to innovate was because they had the time to do so because they had agricultural superiority over the rest of the world [1] [2]. European HistoryRemember it wasn't just African slavery…
- The reason why countries like the US and UK are superpowers has very little to do with their effective management of resources and much more to do with the agricultural superiority of Europe [1]. This allowed for the Europeans to invest more time in warfare and also gave…
- 1119.
Scandals can be useful in politics and academia
For
- Scandal: A scandal can be broadly defined as an accusation or accusations that receive wide exposure. Generally there is a negative effect on the credibility of the person or organisation involved. Society is scandalised when it is made aware of blatant breaches of moral norms…
Against
- My opponent has fail to supply any evidence with how scandals can be benifical to really anyone. All he has done is copy and pasted a definition of Scandal. I rest my case, and believe my aguement logical and reasonable.
- My argument still stands.
- 1120.
Democracy is not the most effective system for a successful society
For
- "My opponent has refused to counter any of my points and has also admitted that they are all true, without seeking to modify anything." As a matter of fact, I have not refused to counter anything, I have modified the argument, and yes, I have admitted they are all true, they…
- Let me start out by saying that I am very pleased with the response my debate has received. All of my opponents arguments are true. In response to my opponents points. Every ideology and every society oppresses minorities, for the most part and helps to justify immoral acts.…
Against
- "Why can't you accept the argument of at least SOMEWHAT absolute morality?" That's absurd. Somewhat absolute morality completely contradicts the "absolute" part. Do you even know what you're saying? "Killing is wrong, stealing is wrong and the like. Always with exceptions of…
- My opponent has refused to counter any of my points and has also admitted that they are all true, without seeking to modify anything. "1. I define a successful society in terms of the morality of it's people. This is depicted by the societies policies and acts. This, of course…
- 1121.
The United States is justified in using private military firms abroad
For
- Thanks for the debate! If you come back to DDO sometime and want to try again, contact me and we can have a rematch.
- Extend my arguments.
Against
- As a brief road map I will answer the points brought up by my opponent and then proceed to bring up my own arguments. As far as I can tell my opponent's first and third arguments are the same and the focus solely on reducing costs to the United States. My opponents second…
- Utilitarianism defined by Plato is the greatest good for the greatest amount of people for the greatest amount of time. Justify -To prove or show to be right, or reasonable Objective - Something toward which effort is directed: an aim, goal, or end of action Abroad -Beyond the…
- 1122.
The NSA should not spy on people
For
- First off, a little factoid I would like to bring to light is that this isn't the NSA's first attempt on gathering intelligence on its own citizens. Americans were told that the original warrant-less wiretapping program authorized by President George W. Bush had been successful…
- Keith Alexander already acknowledged that the NSA collects "business records" of all phone calls and other electronic communications made in the U.S. but is prevented from investigating that mound of data unless it has "reasonable" justification involving communications with…
Against
- It is the job of the NSA to dig into the deep web and find crimes. They are finding evidence to backup suspicion. What you are talking about was authorized by the president at the time. Our current president isn't going to mess up like that because he learned from Bush's…
- The NSA only looks at your information if they have probable cause, or reason to believe that your up to something. The fourth amendment also states if you have a warrent and the door isn't opened within a minute, you can knock it down. This way they don't have time to hide…
- 1123.
Hegemonic soft power and hard power are immoral
For
- Hege is bad, mmmkay?
- Theo, my appologies if I was a bit too hard-core in the debate, I'm used to folks being able to b. s. the topic with me easily. If you want, message me to talk about hege in general. I guess this is still up for voting.
Against
- I negate, The practice of hegemonic soft-power and hard-power are immoral. This will be my first debate as well. And as per my opponent's introduction, we are in agreement that the discussion will center around western players and their foreign policies and philosophies with…
- 1124.
Northern Ireland should leave the United Kingdom
For
- Overhead you are really a good debater. I am no match with you. I give up. You have made brilliant arguments.
- Nothern ireland rightfully belongs to ireland. When ireland was given independence by UK, the english govt. Kept nothern ireland with themselves. Even if majority of the people dont want to leave UK, still i believe that prence of irish people in N.I. who want unification makes…
Against
- Awww shucks, thanks for the compliment.*Blushes and holds hankerchief in front of face like 19th century southern belle*
- PRO FF, extending argument.
- 1125.
North Korea and South Korea should be unified
For
- You've made an excellent opening point about the Koreas becoming vastly different nations with contrasting world-views and unparalleled economic structures since the divisive changes of the 1940s and 1950s. There is no doubting this. Koreans north of the 38th parallel as well…
- Several days ago, I watched a movie named "Spy". Before I watched it I expected it to be a very cruel and horrifying movie, but it was completely opposite from what I had expected. The main characters in the movie are spies from North Korea, but in fact they are just normal…
Against
- Firstly I am very surprised that pro thought other people from other countries and cultures are not like us. Obviously there are many other people just like pro and/or like me. We are all of the same species, but this does not by any means imply this improbable reunification is…
- Hello, I am debating for my first time here and I too like talking about politics. To start this debate I would like to give a very brief and short history on Korea and then I will argue why I believe North Korea and South Korea should not be unified. (1)Korea was its own…
- 1126.
English should be made the official language of the United States
For
- I strongly disagree with this bill for the following three reasons. One, it goes against what America stands for. Two, it is predicted that in 2050 the U.S will be the largest spanish speaking country. And three, it would force immigrants to learn a new language and cost them…
Against
- extendaroo
- extend?
- 1127.
Military conscription is just
For
- Resolved: Military conscription is just Overview: As Justice has been defined as "righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness" it is clear that my burden in this debate is to demonstrate the morality of conscription. I will therefore, give a brief explanation of how…
- Spring Tournament R1: Kasmic vs. Lannan13 Resolved: Military conscription is justBurden of proof on me (pro) to affirm. Definition of Terms:Military: "of or relating to soldiers." (1)Conscription: "compulsory enrollment of persons for military or naval service; draft." (2)…
Against
- All points extended.
- My opponent doesn't actually make an argument. Instead he simply resorts to an Appeal to Authroity Logical fallacy by simply quoting one source and since he's creditable source he assumes that it's true and makes no other points. Please disregard his argument do to this logical…
- 1128.
Libertarian policies are better than liberal policies
For
- Libertarian policies promote freedom and the constitution while liberal policies promote government dependency and socialism.
Against
- No person is better than another in general. If this were true, it would justify slavery, which is clearly wrong. Also, they're fairly similar, only libertarians come off as a bit more selfish. Please post an argument! http://politics.stackexchange.com...
- I extend for now, but please post an argument!
- 1129.
The United States should send troops to Syria
For
- I was comparing the losses to the saved lives in each of those operations, and to the dozens of thousands of Syrian civilians killed in their current civil war because of lack of intervention, and to the millions without homes in need of humanitarian aid. So yes, I used the…
- Operation Provide Promise was a humanitarian effort that provided medical support to hundreds of people and tons of food / medical supplies to needy people in Bosnia [1]. Operation Silver Anvil evacuated 400 people from danger [2]. Only 23 U. S. troops were killed in Operation…
Against
- dont risk American troops! we can do this with drones and planes. I would rather a drone get shot down than a soldier die at battle when we didnt even need him their. Keep Americans safe,while helping the syrian rebels.
- Yes the syrian army is much more organized and it does have a central location, AKA capital. Which means it would be very easy to cripple the regime with airstrikes and no need for ground troops. We can do this job without sending troops and risking our troops lives. Save…
- 1130.
The United States should arm the Kurds
For
- Con argues that the fact that the US's intention in Syria is to topple Assad, in the hopes of countering Russian influence in the region has a material impact. But it doesn't matter what the US's intent or purpose in the region is, because this doesn't have an impact in the…
- Con starts off with rebuttals, arguing that the greater American *interest* is in toppling Assad, rather than defeating ISIL, in the end goal of countering Russian influence in the region. But the only actual material rebuttals Con provides is that the Kurds are not militarily…
Against
- Counter Arguments and RebuttalsPro continuously states that Assad has no relevancy in this argument. That statement is nearly ridiculous, when Assad and the Kurds have been long time rivals, and are currently fighting each other and ISIS. My statement of the US intent to topple…
- Rebuttals and Counter ArgumentsMy opponent begins his argument stating that there was no material rebuttal on the basis of American interests in Syria. I did label a source in the previous round highlighting that the United States entered Syria with the intention of toppling…
- 1131.
Japan should be allowed to maintain a military and control Okinawa
For
- Since the end of WWII Japan has not had a military and has been occupied by the U.S. and much has changed. Japan is no longer a dangerous empire but a peaceful nation. Although former Axis countries, Germany and Italy, have been able to keep their right to a military, Japan has…
Against
- In this round I continue to presenting one rebuttal for Pro`s arguments. Rebuttal: Make the area a safer to possible invaders. If Japan were to re-militarize, I believe it would not make the area a safer place to possible invaders. China and North Korea have nuclear weapons.…
- I want to present a number of rebuttals for Pro`s arguments made in Round 1. 1. Increase U.S. -Japan relations I believe that the remilitarization of Japan does not contribute to increasing U.S. - Japan relations. As you already know, the relationship between the two countries…
- 1132.
The United States should build a border wall
For
- the border is great, It has alot of great uses such as keeping out the illeagls and cos the government moneyt.
- I beleve that a border wall is needed to keep out the drug dealers and all of the bad people, I don't care about the good illegals, Like the ones who will get a job and try to get citizenship. But not the ones who sit around collecting tax payer money
Against
- I'm not surprised.
- Notwithstanding the fact that Pro's 21 word eulogy contains 6 grammatical errors. I think that it's fair to say that Pro has not exactly put their heart and soul into round 2. "The border is Great. " Is the border great? Or is the proposed border wall going to be great? How…
- 1133.
The federal government should pay reparations to African Americans
For
- By laws of debate and common sense, I claim victory.
- Sorry if my position was unclear.I am on the PRO side, supporting the fact that the USFG "ought to" give reparations back to African Americans.My opponent is on the CON side. He gave you arguments regarding "can we" but this debate is about "ought to".My stance is that we ought…
Against
- I'm afraid that there may have been a misunderstanding? I am Con, and I'm advocating that The government out NOT to pay reparations. My opponent simply attacked my definition of ought, but actually helped me??He states that it's not feasible to give reparations, which is…
- I hope we have a great experince =) In this round, I will be presenting my arguments. ==========================================================================Definitions:Ought - Used to indicate a desirable or expected state [Oxford Dictionary] Reparations - The making of…
- 1134.
The United States is a true democracy
For
- I confidently restate that the U.S. is in fact a republic. I also maintain that our republic is a form of democracy. West says "Just because something is a form of something does not mean it is equivalent to that thing." The resolution states "The USA is a Democracy." The…
- " This definition does not come from the link he sourced, or any dictionary known to me. Here is dictionary. com's definition of a democracy. "government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by…
Against
- 1. Pro says he does not know where I got my definition of democracy from, so I will post the source. "The chief characteristic and distinguishing feature of a Democracy is: Rule by Omnipotent Majority. In a Democracy, The Individual, and any group of Individuals composing any…
- The USA was never meant to be a democracy but a republic. A democracy is rule by omnipotent majority, and a republic is meant to limit the power of the majority to protect minority rights [A]. Even though the USA is supposed to be a democratic republic, a recent Princeton study…
- 1135.
Targeted killing is a morally permissible foreign policy tool
For
- I affirm: Targeted Killing is a morally permissible foreign policy tool Targeted Killing: the premeditated, preemptive, and deliberate killing of an individual or individuals known to represent a clear and present threat to the safety and security of a state. (Hunter). Ob. 1:…
- I accept. Good luck!
Against
- History teaches us that when the rule of law is replaced by the rule of might, civilization regresses and the social costs increase far beyond the temporary impressions of security. When governments forego legality and legitimacy, they enhance the legitimacy of the claims of…
- Round 2 is cases. Since the word limit is the same, this will be a little different than normal LD structure. No rebuttals in round 2. round 3 is rebuttals. round 4 is further rebuttals/defense. round 5 is summary/voter issues. cross examination is permitted in the comments…
- 1136.
Education is the best way to counter the New World Order
For
- The impending NWO is not a debatable in its existence. It is obvious that it is happening, so please do not make this an argument debating on whether this is a false "conspiracy". I believe that the best way to hault this conspiracy is through educating the American public of…
Against
- But, it was not meant to be.
- extend.
- 1137.
The United States is better described as a republic than a democracy
For
- you argue america was/is a democracy, I argue we are a politidty/republic like the old rome. Democracy: government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free…
- My opponent argues that America was/is a democracy. I will provide definitions next round. If you do you have automaticity FF'd the debate. No word play with the title. My definitions will be fair. Good luck :)
Against
- I'm going to start out here with a major framing issue for the round (This will be the major premise I stress continuously as how you should frame your ballot) that the concept of a republic (in the pure Roman sense as my opponent likes to defend) and a Democracy (say we go…
- I guess I'll bite. I'm just intrigued to see what you mean by fair definitions. Oh I do hope they come backed with peer reviewed research and historical papers.
- 1138.
The United States is justified in using private military firms abroad to pursue its military objectives
For
- In using private military firms abroad, the United States would open itself up both diplomatically and economically. On the diplomatic stand point, we can see that the United States would keep consistent positive relations with other nations in order to keep these privatized…
Against
- since my opponent did not post his argument, i am unable to counter his argument. thank you for the debate and i urge you to vote for me.
- I negate the resolution "Resolved: The United States is justified in using private military firms abroad to pursue its military objectives." For clarity in the round, I offer these definitions: PMF: a private business organization, which markets military training and expertise,…
- 1139.
The US president should meet directly with Cuba's leader
For
- I see you've insisted on turning this debate into a history lesson. Either way, I have brought up points as to why the next President of the US SHOULD meet with the next President of Cuba. It was supposed to be your position that he shouldn't, but you never presented any…
- Blond Guy, I apologize I don't have time to post a well thought out argument, but I will try a quick response to some points. I am in the process of moving, but the next round I should have more time. "I gave you a reason why Obama shouldn't go. Because it would be a waste of…
Against
- "Are you saying Castro would completely ignore the possibility of ending the embargo?" No, I'm saying Castro doesn't care about the embargo because it is not hurting him as much as it is hurting the people. It's actually helping him now because he can tell Cubans once again…
- "That's not a reason, that's an opinion." Almost all reasons are opinions "Have you ever visited Cuba?" Yes, I have. "You never know until you have a diplomatic experience, which I doubt any 14 year old has (not attacking your age, just that you have not had that experience)."…
- 1140.
Refugees should be barred until the ISIS threat ends
For
- Forgive me for not posting an argument but i have been very busy with work.now my argument is this if you recall a certain incident took place in the media recently that involved a refugee from syria that along with a accomplice attacked a pacted building of american citzens…
- this will be a serious debate facts must be double checked with links to them in the description of their argument All Spammer like arguments comments will be reported along with the person who posted it let the debate begin.
Against
- Happy holidays to you. Thanks for making your debate statement rather than dropping the topic all together. I look forward to a good two rounds.The heading for this debate is "We should not help anyone seeking refuge into this country until the Isis situation is taken care of"…
- I will not waste my time writing and formulating of an argument for a person who initiates a debate than forfeits. All done here.
- 1141.
America has too many laws and excessive government authority
For
- Thanks for joining this debate. "berserk authority" i was tired when i wrote that title.Anyway,Do you think that you are free? Most Americans would still probably answer "yes" to that question, but is that really the case? In the film Edge of Darkness, Mel Gibson stated that…
- In fact, 40,000 new laws (. http://www.msnbc.msn.com...) just went into effect in January. Every single new law restricts your freedom just a little bit more.
Against
- Extend all arguments. It appears my opponent has deactivated his account.
- What I said in R1 is clearly incorrect as I have misinterpreted what my opponent says, and this debate clearly needs some definitions. I had misunderstood what my opponent meant by "laws", I thought my opponent meant common laws such as murder, theft, etc. not laws from…
- 1142.
History should not be the only judge of communism
For
- I must to say I do like this debate. Now then as to liberation, I will outline exactly how this works, why it didn't in China and Russia (not Albania as I am not familiar with its history) and finally how we can achieve it. Firstly, the way we organize the control of the…
- Alright. So this is how it's gonna be then. Well you want this debate, I guess we'll have it. Ahem. From the bondage and inequality that is capitalism arose communism. Within it was the hope of liberation and equality for all humankind, and the destruction of the system which…
Against
- Yeh, Lenninist, we did have a tense and sensible debate.Elections? What elections? The last time I checked, Mao kept talking about his "democratic dictatorship" [1], Lenin said that "Democracy is a bourgeisie phenomenom" [2], and Marx, simply, left no manuscripts on democracy.…
- RebuttalsLiberation under communism? Are you joking? Are you seriously joking? The only liberation under communism that anyone could feel is the liberation from their individual liberty; the liberation of the working class can only be followed by complete oppression, unneeded…
- 1143.
South Ossetia has a right to self-determination
For
- The 1993 Vienna Declaration, which reaffirmed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter (and so sets the standard in current international law), unequivocally gives all peoples the right to self-determination: "All people have the right to self-determination.…
- "South Ossetians, too, have the right to self-determination". Daily Telegraph. 11 Aug. 2008
Against
- Self-determination is not an absolute right. Not every territory and region in the world that seeks independence has the right to it. This is due in no small part to the fact that such a system would be unworkable. Certain criteria must be met for a territory and people to…
- 1144.
The US government should cut funding for anti-poverty programs
For
- Hi, this is my first "debate"; I'm not going to present a formal case, but will simply list a few points. -Programs that give food to the homeless are good, but they spend money that could be used on other, more useful things -From a utilitarian perspective, it does not do…
- Please don't judge me as I am doing this for the sake of debate/fun and may have personal viewpoints differing from the ones I put down :) "The US does owe 17.2 billion dollars but..." *17.2 trillion* My opponent criticizes my way of justifying my arguments with utilitarianism…
Against
- Darn, forfeit!
- I make it a habit not to take others' views personally :) And I appreciate that my opponent hasn't forfeited either I shall respond to attempt to my opponent's attempts to justify his utilitarian values and, in this case, reconcile them with the standard ones that I had thought…
- 1145.
America's two-party system should be replaced by multiparty politics
For
- i am sorry for the lack of debate. i thought i had a solid argument, but i didn't. btwn that and graduation, i am terribly sorry
- i dnt have anything. i forfeit
Against
- Continue all arguments. There really needs to be a way to end a debate when one's opponent forfeits.
- Continue all arguments.
- 1146.
The United States should build a border fence with Mexico
For
- There are about 1,450,000 and 800,0 0 on reserve that shouldn't be hard Even isreal has soldiers monitoring all it borders and the whole country with an army of 50,000
- Trump does not only wish to build a wall he wishes to put soldiers there to these soldiers will watch on cameras to see what is happening
Against
- Israel is also getting bombed like every day, not really the same thing, and thats national reserve which would require moving them there and then housing them and turning the border into a warzone. No one wants that
- The border is 2000 miles long, it is impossible to monitor the entire border and have guards on the ground to react to people crossing it. And the US soldiers cannot be deployed inside the United States in times of peace, you might mean national guardsmen.
- 1147.
Women should be allowed in combat roles in the US military
For
- I will rest on my given arguments. Thank you for the debate.
- As we all know, there is no longer a designated frontline that protects a soldier from being in combat. The days of a battle front in a war are over. When a service man or woman is checking vehicles in Afghanistan, and the vehicle explodes due to a car bomb, that soldier is…
Against
- Unfortunately, I realize that I mistakenly pressed the "W" as opposed to the "S" when I was posting this debate, so I do apologize. I agree, in today's progressive society, it is not a question of if we will ever allow females to operate in MOS's that have the capability and…
- Let's talk about it.
- 1148.
Anarchy is unsustainable
For
- Passing.
- I won by debate rules.
Against
- bam dats what ye get anarchy eeessss so fackin awesum me bulls be spldin in tackos cross de stars!
- ya dont kow nutin bout me contre lad ya know en iruland we got anarchy up ur fat azes buy sheetin foockin ttacos out ur bums inta yur wee face. that anarchy and how is det a know good? dont ya las lie tit when beeg old swesty pop be slashin in ya face? i te;; ya yu dont know…
- 1149.
The United Nations does more harm than good
For
- Well, I haven't got the time to make another argument, sorry, I'm busy trying to catch up with school after being sick so much in the past month. I just don't have the time to do the research and write the argument. Sorry. Sincerely, Kat.
- Uhm... I have nothing to rebut so I guess I'll just say: The UN failed to protect the Tutsi's even with prior knowledge of the impending massacre.
Against
- Sorry about not posting...i was getting ready for a lincoln douglass tournement... not my best type of debate... so here it goes: First point) "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war", but since the establishment of the UN there have been many wars. Why? They…
- Resolved: That the United Nations is a bad organization (I got hit pretty hard in one of my other debates for not defining P.E.T.A., so now I define any word that needs defining) Definitions: United Nations-political organization established 1945; headquarters in New York City…
- 1150.
Welfare is good for America
For
- This debate is quickly becoming pointless. Did you give up or forget about the debate?
- Your argument, please?
Against
- Welfare is a ridiculous socialist way to solve poverty. It gives people no reason to work. Long term, welfare makes communities worse. Private charity should help the truly helpless, the rest should help themselves. Our society is economically backwards, it rewards failure and…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?