Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 14
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 651.
A revolution in America is not possible
For
- Ugh. Next time, don't take the topic so literally, bro. Now I have to repost the argument. And my argument has to be 100 characters long so I'm just going to type about nothing so I can fulfill the limit.
- What your talking about is just semantics, which doesn't change my argument at all. I just didn't word it clearly. Please don't tell me that is your whole argument.
Against
- ugh, next time make your arguments clearer bro. I can only go off of what is written so that's what I used. And anyways, I think it's quite unfair to use an impossibly vague opener like the one you used. You barely tell me what you think and give me no reason why. If you want…
- Yeah, that's my argument. Since you didn't really explain what you were advocating I assumed you were advocating the "topic of debate" -- seems reasonable to me. Look, at best you can advocate that a revolution in the US in its current state is unlikely, but we have no way of…
- 652.
States should have no right to peacefully secede from the United States
For
- Since this is the 5th round, con and I cannot introduce any new points to the debate. So, I will use this round to summarize and explain why I have won this debate. Part One1. It was the burden of con to prove that "A" state had "SOME" right to secession whether it is a legal…
- "Let's look back to my turn on his 3rd contention. This is cleanly extended in round 2 as Provision 1 subpoint 1 ii: " My opponent states himself 'the Constitution and Declaration of Independence do allude to the peoples right to form a revolution and create a new government,…
Against
- I apologize sincerely for the forfeited round. Things came up in my personal life and I simply could not find a sufficient amount of time to log onto debate.org for anything more than a quick post. However, I will show you that I win this round even without a round 4 speech.My…
- "Given that you have accepted that my framework is under the moral right to secede, I do also accept that if you can prove a legal right to secede, then the debate is yours."Let's look back to my turn on his 3rd contention. This is cleanly extended in round 2 as Provision 1…
- 653.
Government is necessary for a functioning society
For
- the first gun made in 1640 but there is evidence of slavery over 11000 years ago in the Neolithic revolution. so you wouldn't have a gun because the power house slave owners would have you working their fields picking cotton whipping you across the back every time you thought…
- ever sense 1783 there has been a government that gives you rights such as the second amendment that allows you to bear arms. without the government that second amendment goes away and you no longer have your gun or any bullets to put in it.
Against
- https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com... look at this website and this is us with the government http://www.cincinnatichildrens.org... and this website will show you us without government
- 1783 my butt crack , in 1640 the first gun was made and no one could take it away , we were our own authority and without the government it isn't against the law to have the gun, and if someone wants to try go ahead if you want some lead in you. plus you don't need the…
- 654.
Federally held corporations are the best method for administering social programs
For
- Efficiency is the key, you are entirely right. As I said in the second round "Acting in an independent capacity, such as the Federal Reserve, the company would execute it's charter." This would solve your problem of having any decisions bounced between congressional committees…
- I sympathize with your points on administration and finance. However the I would disagree with you to say you get the best of both worlds and ditch the problems. First of all I am sorry if in my first statement I did not make clear that the corporation in question would be 100%…
Against
- I sympathize with your points on administration and finance. However the I would disagree with you to say you get the best of both worlds and ditch the problems. First of all I am sorry if in my first statement I did not make clear that the corporation in question would be 100%…
- Federally held corporations clearly are NOT the solution when it comes to administering social programmes. In reality, the United States would be far better off utilising either of the alternatives, as opposing as they may seem. The first way is to simply have the government…
- 655.
Fox News is fair and balanced
For
- Many in the media have been enchanted with Barack Obama; Lee Cowan of NBC News actually admitted that "it's almost hard to remain objective." Meanwhile, MSNBC's Chris Matthews claimed that Hillary Clinton won her Senate seat only because "her husband messed around." The Factor…
- Fox News has been getting a lot of bad press, saying it is not telling the truth or is to far to the right, now I am going to give examples of how it is fair and balanced. according to a statistic, Fox News is about 50-50 with positives and negatives with politcal candidates.…
Against
- Sure, other media sources are biased. Thats not relevant to the topic though. Your stats only prove that FOX bashes Obama and Hillary equally. That doesn't say anything to the fact of comparing republicans to democrats or conservatives to liberals. FOX continually posts…
- Let me start by saying that I am a HUGE fan of FOXNEWS. I watch it for hours. That being said, there is no way they are fair and balanced. I would like to see this study if you have a link to it. Nearly every pundant on FOXNEWS has a conservative bias. Additionally, every…
- 656.
The EU should restrict mass immigration
For
- I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so…
- I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so…
Against
- Well how are you nice to meet you and yes maybe we are into different levels of stupidness but you are definitely below me. How can you say that mass immigration is not bad for the eu. I don't know if you stay in your home below a desk whating for a mom to bring you your…
- Mass immigration is bad for the eu it damages -economy -security -culture (youst intro argument)
- 657.
South Korea should possess nuclear weapons
For
- First, there is a right to self defense, especially in the situation when South Korea is receiving severe imminent threat. The Korean war has still not ended. Although the last fight had occurred 60 years ago, there was no treaty or declaration confirming the end of the war,…
- I would like to define this motion and state the status quo in the first round. First, I would like to define possess as in developing and owning something (in this case, nuclear weapons) for one's own country. Nuclear weapons are powerful weapons that derive their force from…
Against
- I will be arguing against South Korea possessing nuclear weapons.
- US Military ExpenditureYour first argument declares that the US may not be there to protect South Korea because we may not have similar interests. To advocate for that idea, you state that America is incapable of 'doing our job' because we have gone through an economic…
- 658.
Weak governments should be overthrown
For
- Thank you for your replies, now lets jump straight into rebuttals. "Weak Government is better than no government at all." This is not true in the slightest. While a weak government clings to the reigns of power like a disease they will use old tactics to improve themselves, if…
- First for the start of the debate I will more thoroughly define weak governments, essentially I am arguing that governments that are weak in any way, (through economic weakness, corruption, war etc. ) should be overthrown. Keep in mind however that things like plague, which…
Against
- One thing that really stood out from your response was this: "Every leader who is not a tyrant and is voted in has a certain number of years as their term. In the U.S. every four years we deprive an official government of their power. I cannot comprehend why you think of this…
- Yes it is true that Weak Governments affect the people they are ruling over. But a Weak Government is better than no government at all. We cannot overthrow a government that is too weak mainly because it is not politically moral, what good could possibly come out of forcibly…
- 659.
American drone strikes in the Middle East have done more harm than good
For
- On my opponent"s contention: His chart is directly contradicted by Pakistan"s own foreign ministry, which claims at least 400 civilian deaths (1). The accuracy of information from Long War Journal is questionable because it contradicts the reports of more widely-recognized news…
- CRITERION: This round should be evaluated on net benefits, which is implicit in the resolution. If I can prove that the total harm that has been caused by drone strikes exceeds the good things that happened because of them, I will win the round. If I cannot, Con will win.…
Against
- Arguments Drone strikes effectively fight terrorism without killing many civilians. The graph below shows the number of drone strikes in Pakistan since 2004: [1] The next graph shows the number of Taliban/Al-Qaeda deaths caused by the strikes compared to civilian deaths: [1]…
- I accept.
- 660.
Anarcho-capitalism would eventually evolve into socialism or communism
For
- Con may begin their argument in round 1 if they so wish, but if they do, they must waive round 4 and say something like "I'm waiving this round as agreed upon" since I am not using round 1 for debate. This is to keep the amount of rounds used for debate even. Otherwise, begin…
- As I stated, this round will be used for conclusion and reasons why you won. We can restate arguments here but no new arguments.To restate what I have stated:1) Business owners will not have people protecting their private property rights under an anarchist society, which can…
Against
- Pro offers an interesting point concerning the so called creation of jobs. However his point ignores the idea that (i) money is totally irrelevant, (ii) wealth concentrates, (iii) new "jobs" are irrelevant for our debate and (iv) technology assures both wealth and security for…
- I agree with the following parts so they are taken out of the debate: Some people will accumulate more. There will be private armies. Some people will have almost nothing/will live in terrible conditions. What pro fails to consider is that wealth will need lees people to…
- 661.
Russia poses a threat to US interests
For
- Through empirical analysis and hard evidence, I will show you several interests of the United States of which Russia has become a threat to, proving an affirmation of the resolution. The following interests are named as such by President Bush on the official White House…
- Russia being a threat is a very current topic. I dont make the resolutions, i just debate them, and if we agree that Russia is a proliferation threat, i win this one too. Dont tell me how to debate PF, ive broken at emory and gone to nats, stick to the topic, pal. i said if…
Against
- • US Interest #1: "Countering global proliferation of arms", Well I do not argree with this for two reasons, one , here is a quote from our own government."We need to take account of what is working in our relationship with Russia but also to be very clear about where we…
- "Russia being a threat is a very current topic. I dont make the resolutions, i just debate them, and if we agree that Russia is a proliferation threat, i win this one too.", Yes, but they have always been a threat,so it shopuld be dropped,because it refers to after the soviet…
- 662.
Twentieth-century US interventionism has done more harm than good
For
- Sorry but between school and college applications I just have not had time to look at this debate. I will probably revive it in the future.
- I defer this round so my opponent has a chance to voice his opening statement and outline his arguments
Against
- Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited this debate.
- My opponent has forfeited two rounds of this debate. I have presented a case, Con has not presented a case nor offered a rebuttal to my case.
- 663.
Politicians' personal faith should not shape their votes
For
- For practical purposes, let us have this debate simply regard the U.S. Sorry for not clarifying. As for religion, I am fairly sure that we both know what we are talking about regarding definitions, so there is little need to go further in depth at the time. "A policy that is…
- Greetings, I thank you for participating in my debate, and I hope this turns out to be an enthralling discussion. Before you proceed with the debate, I would like to note how I used the word "should" in my title and opening argument of the debate. The word "should" refers to…
Against
- I apologize beforehand for the curtness of this rebuttal. I have my last midterm tomorrow and the debate runs out before I truly get some extended free time. This debate has come down to two main things in my mind. One is based on deductive reasoning. The other is based on…
- Before I do my official rebuttal I would like to clear a few things. First, is this debate only about the U.S? It wasn't clear in the opening speech but I will argue from this frame of mind. Also for definitions, religion is religion. I am not going to define it as that would…
- 664.
Thatcherism is a force for good
For
- Firstly, my argument is not that the "milk snatching" was irrelevant to Thatcher"s legacy; it was the best way to save money without having to reduce the quality of education by reducing numbers of teachers, etc. Poor children were entitled to subsidised milk, and even those…
- To begin, Margaret Thatcher stopped free school milk for children when she was Minister for Education, before she was Prime Minister and even before she was leader of the opposition. She did so because it was better to stop wasting money on milk no one drank anyway (even my…
Against
- Defense: Overall view of ThatcherismPro began to criticize my point on the milk snatcher by claiming that she hold a ministerial position. So? Point being is whether it acts a force for good or acts a detriment to society. I have proved in each instances in the debate that She…
- Pro did not specify any rules, So I'll just go ahead with arguments. Let the fun begin. I'll have something light and easyOverall view of ThatcherismThatcher's major shift from comprehensive to market values within the system have caused immeasurable harm. Riots arise along…
- 665.
Quebec should not secede from Canada
For
- I hate the fact that Quebec wants to leave Canada and become a new country, first it would separate Canada into two parts, if Quebec started a war it will create havoc every ware and every map of Canada would need to change.
Against
- Since my opponent has forfeited 2 rounds and not given any form of rebuttal or extended argument, I urge a PRO vote.
- Since my opponent has not responded, I extend my argument and await his response.
- 666.
China should become a federal republic
For
- I will conclude in round 4, as per rules, but first I want to address a couple concerns and likely confusions my opponent may be having. My issue with my opponent's proposal is not that he is proposing Federalism. I have nothing against Federalism and I find it to be an…
- "My opponent and me have agreed on a few things in the comments. - China will follow the US and Korean Three Branch system.(House,Executive,Senate)"I have already given in to 2 handicaps for my opponent's convenience, so I shall not be granting a third. I will retract my…
Against
- Although throughout our exchange I have disagreed with him, I have nonetheless learned much about his proposed system of government, the benefits, and of course, the drawbacks. *** My conclusion is quite simplistic as my opponent is the one to carry the burden of proof for the…
- I would like to clarify with my opponent about the McGovernment issue before we begin: My issue with my opponent's proposal is not that he is proposing Federalism. I have nothing against Federalism and I find it to be an excellent system of government. My problem is with the…
- 667.
Political parties should be abolished
For
- I would like to begin by stating that when ever there is a devision in a unified body, corrupting, greed, and progress will halt. This is a situation which has happened, and is bound to happen again. The list includes but is not limited to: The USSR The Union v. The Confederacy…
- I am affirmative on the issue.
Against
- I agree that "political parties are run by large companies or business men who wish to make a profit" in America today. But I assert that it does not intrinsically have to be this way. The status quo can always be changed. I will also continue to assert that abstinence is NOT…
- It might be "more beneficial for political parties to just abolish themselves" or it might not be. It could go either way depending on the populous. Also, I have to strongly disagree that "abstinence is agreement". If so, then the abstinence of sexual consent during a sexual…
- 668.
The United States should make English and Spanish official languages
For
- Please use more than personal opinion in your arguments. Do not use Wikipedia for a source, but instead, go to the bottom of the Wikipedia page, find the source, and cite the original website that the information was on. If you cannot find the source, then the Wikipedia…
- I must make one thing clear for you. Official language does not mean only language. People would still be able to live and work here if they speak Chinese only. Also, you misunderstood what I said about Xhosa. Few Americans speak it, and without an official language, the…
Against
- My opponent says that the official language does not mean only language and that people would still be able to live here if they speak Chinese only. This is actually false. "Official language" means that the government will only conduct business in that language, which deprives…
- Let us be clear about one thing: America is not a European nation. The reason that there is no official language is that the government is not promoting any one culture over another and is not favoring any one group over another. Not all citizens speak English or Spanish; some…
- 669.
The National Endowment for the Arts should be abolished
For
- As my opponent has forfeited another round, I will write my conclusion. On balance, the NEA should be abolished on the following grounds. First, they are taking government money, no matter how little or much, from things such as education, military, e.t.c. Second, all the…
- The NEA is taking government funds from more important projects, and bringing it to local artists. Which in my opinion they should have to earn the money themselves. The NEA as an organization to promote local artists and projects should be a privately funded organization. I…
Against
- Affirmative: The National Endowment for the Arts should not be abolished.
- 670.
The European Union should have an army
For
- First 1 - If Eu had one army all the 27 member states would have to make one decision about the war ,they all have to support it or not . So Eu would not be divided on the subject of war and their foreign policy would be the same .So Eu would be more united and exercise more…
- First of all i am sorry for not posting debate resolution and for my English grammar mistakes . 1 - Eu is not united on my causes about the war . Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain,…
Against
- "1 - If Eu had one army all the 27 member states would have to make one decision about the war ,they all have to support it or not . So Eu would not be divided on the subject of war and their foreign policy would be the same ." -I think you horribly miscalculate and…
- There is no need to apologize. You are Lithuanian and write better English than many of the native English-speakers on this site. It is good for any debater to be wary of using "should" too casually, so just consider that friendly advice. I am assuming that you did mean "Eu is…
- 671.
Iran should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons
For
- Apology is accepted and I also appreciate your civility as we discuss this very important topic. You're terminology is a way of sounding more intelligent, but no really making good points. MY REBUTTAL: First of all I want to ask you to not change the topic please. It is a…
- Thank you very much and I hope you can join my side when its over lol. Please, no need to apologize for these minor errors; its more important to get a well rounded idea backed with facts, rather than using fancy words sounding smart. (I dont call your ideas "folderol" which…
Against
- Starting Reactionary Remarks - Sorry for my use of the term 'folderol' I meant it only as a light antagonism, and not a subversion of your argument's credibility. (being English the House of Commons style of debating is my natural projection which I understand gets…
- First off I'd like to apologise for two spelling faults of my own those being appealing instead of appalling and mantra instead of maxim (however the latter still makes syntactic sense somewhat) now swiftly moving on. To begin with I actually assent with your point on Israel's…
- 672.
Monarchy is not objectively a bad system of government
For
- Though the idea of a monarchy takes away the power of both the monarch and the citizens choice, and they very well might not want the power, I disagree with "There will be people with powers that they may not be suited to handle", in the case of a monarch every moment before…
- By objectively bad I mean inherently unethical. Government system the system by which a state or community is controlled. I'm arguing for the idea of an absolute monarchy (I have been having bad memory problems, so I couldn't remember the word or how to look it up at the time),…
Against
- I think you raise some good points but the main problem with a monarchy is that people have no choice in the matter. Another way to look at a ruling monarchy is to call it a dictatorship. When you do that then all the flaws of a monarchy comes out: Sadam Hussein torturing and…
- The problem with a monarchy is that it unfairly places a single family in charge of something. There will be people with powers that they may not be suited to handle or even want to handle. The world is too complex to place into the hands of a single person and it is too risky…
- 673.
The US should redirect half its military budget to space exploration
For
- I'm not saying we should be unarmed of military weapons, I'm saying for the US, we should cut the budget of building new weapons. Our allies will still have weapons, and since we already have a great military power, we can ask allies to help countries in need. I understand that…
- We could convince other allies to help, and in return pay with money or other ways. Its all about diplomacy. We could share military powers with a trusted country such as Canada. If we join forces with other allies, it'll reduce the chances of nuclear war. And being peaceful…
Against
- The United States is still the largest power, with all others falling g far behind,if we slashed our military budget by 50 percent, it would grant them the opportunity to catch-up. This will eventually happen either way, why speed it up. New weapons like nanoweapons will change…
- The more counties agree to the no aggression/peace pact, the more whoever secretly builds nuclear weapons, or a large army will, stand to gain. You cannot have an entire earth of peacefully nations because the massive benefit from attacking your now unarmed neighbors will be…
- 674.
ISIS should be destroyed
For
- ISIL- The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant- to be around thirty to fifty thousand people. The wikipedia entry regarding the Military of ISIL makes a great summary of all of the information we have regarding the presence and operational forces of ISIL. Military of ISIL…
- ISIL- The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant- to be around thirty to fifty thousand people. The wikipedia entry regarding the Military of ISIL makes a great summary of all of the information we have regarding the presence and operational forces of ISIL. Military of ISIL…
Against
- They Are People, They dont need to Die…
- White Power
- 675.
Democracy is preferable to monarchy as a system of government
For
- Thanks Con.First, I must point out that my opponent is under the misguided assumption that I advocate authoritarianism from a King; while in fact the opposite is true. One of my fundamental points of contention is that Princely rulers are, on balance, less oppressive and…
- Thank you FourTrouble, for your acceptance! This will be pretty straight-foward, I'm presenting my case. C1: Foreign Relations A. WarWar in the modern sense is perhaps the most economically destructive of all Human activities, because it forces nations to use resources for the…
Against
- Extend my arguments, please. My opponent and I will continue to argue in the next round.
- Pro has misunderstood/misrepresented my position. Before addressing Pro's case, I'm going to provide another argument for my case, then I will systematically negate Pro's claims/arguments. Argument 2: This is a debate about which system of government is "inherently superior,"…
- 676.
Democracy is not the best form of government
For
- Im disappointed to see that Con forfeited the last round. Well if Con wishes to use the last round to do both his rebuttal and closing statement, he can feel free to. For my closing argument, I will reiterate my position. Democracy is not the best form of government. Allowing…
- I did not make a common error. Not allowing "everyone- to vote violates what a democracy stands for. For example, let me clarify the last three definition of aristocracy from dictionary.com: 3. government by those considered to be the best or most able people in the state 4. a…
Against
- Terribly sorry about the forfeit, you know how it is. Busy and whatnot. Alas, my business pervades this particular point in the Universal Time line, so I'm afraid I shan't be making any more cases. Yes, this means you probably will win. Kudos to you.
- In your assessment of democracy, you made a common error that most everyone also makes: just because not everyone can vote does not mean that a given society is not a democracy. For example, in Athens, the system of government was in fact a democracy. True, women and slaves…
- 677.
Gerrymandering should remain legal in the United States
For
- In the case for the 2010 republican blow out, this was a reactionary measurement republicans took as a result of Obama"s victory and his terrible health care agenda. The republicans planned these state representative victories and redistricting for years unlike the democrats…
- I don"t believe political gerrymandering limits democracy in any way and it is justifiably constitutional.
Against
- My opponent brings up how 2010 was a republican blowout, this is true, but I would argue the reason they have maintained control of the house is because of gerrymandering. As pointed out in the previous round, there are at least 13 seats they gained or are maintaining from…
- First, my opponent suggested that anybody could use gerrymandering to their advantage, however this is not the case. Whoever is in power at the time is the party that benefits from gerrymandering(as it's the party in power that sets up the districts), and when redistricting…
- 678.
George W. Bush was a good president
For
- George Bush was one of america greatest leaders in American History he did many things 1. He passes massive tax relief for the american people because they needed and that setted off huge job growth for many years he greatly stimulated the economy 2. He freed Iraq took out a…
- Let me just address the economy first for the first seven years of his presidentiay unemployment was low in may of 2007 unemployment was 4.4 percent and when he came into to office the econmy was in recession he got us out of it and he left the defcit at 455 billion obama has…
Against
- Please extend arguments and refutations yet again. It is unfortunate that my opponent was unable to rebut my points. As such I urge a Con vote.
- Extend arguments and refutations. Did you know George Bush appointed the first African-America woman to a senior role in the Executive cabinet in American history? *The more you know*
- 679.
America is better than every other country
For
- I disagree. The older the better as the person is more informed and the chance of an unplanned pregnancy goes way down. Please put forth a real argument, please. P.S. That's messed up! >:(
- Rules: To disprove my claim give me a country that you believe is better than America. (Don't do Norway as I've already shredded that country from being better) No arguments like: It's an opinion.
Against
- Literally every country that has age of consent below 18. What good is the country if I can't have sex with a beautiful 14 year-old girl? Well, maybe I wouldn't go that old. I prefer 4 year-olds. But a lot of countries have ages of consent below 18 and that's why they are…
- I can't give you a country better than U.S.A. if you set your goal on freedom. I guess U.S.A. does have freedom constitutionally guaranteed unlike most other countries (I guess). And I don't know how to measure levels of freedom. So let's just say U.S.A. is the greatest because…
- 680.
The United States has the world's greatest military
For
- My opponent can refer to his experience and complain about a supposed ad hominem attack (interesting that you can't even spell it correct and yet claim to know it when you see it), but unless he actually knows what the fallacy is he's simply embarrassing himself. Here's a…
- My opponent's round is similar to his previous rounds in the sense that he consistently argues from a jaded perspective - he's constantly and conveniently ignoring obvious contentions, making bold claims with no evidence, or distorting historical facts. To begin, he responds to…
Against
- "An ad hominem only applies if an insult is used IN PLACE of an argument TO FURTHER a claim. " Yes, which is what you've been doing at the start of every round, offering these little one-sided commentaries to what I presume are the people who will judge the debate and in doing…
- At times, it can be frustrating dealing with my opponent's apparent ignorance of my argument, logic, and crucial issues pertaining to this debate. A recurring flaw is his attempts to scrutinize on a single unit/equipment/etc. And then make generalizing claims from this - an…
- 681.
Anarchy is preferable to totalitarianism
For
- I hope everything turns out alright Lannan.
- Dropped Arguments My opponent dropped quite a few arguments. He conceded the following: - That personal autonomy allows human beings to be distinct, moral, and valuable individuals. - That totalitarian states put flawed humans in positions of immense power. - That totalitarian…
Against
- Pass.
- I withdraw due to personal matters.
- 682.
Iowa's role in presidential primaries should be reduced
For
- If we had a more controlled political campaign in our country, it would not take $100 million + to be a President. Iowa is not diverse, and also very "inwartd thinking" according to sqharawa below in the comments section. Thats not a represnetation of the majority of this…
- I live in the most populous state in the union, and my vote is much less important then some small town farm boy in Iowa. Thats not fair. We should have a national primary, to allow my voice to be just as important in picking my nominee as someone in a diner when its 10 degrees…
Against
- Thats why there are states in this country. Because a person in New York can never represent me in South Florida. We can't look to a state to represent the entire country we will never find that. Instead we need to focus on the logistics of the campaign, what will give more…
- Ironically today is the day of the Iowa Caucus. GO MIKE HUCKABEE!!! SUPPORT THE HUCKABOOM www.mikehuckabee.com
- 683.
Military recruiting in schools should be prohibited
For
- The Armed Forces are less than honest
- US military recruitment in schools has a very sinister side.
Against
- The Armed Forces need recruits
- The Armed Forces are a legitimate career option
- 684.
The United Kingdom should remain a member of the EU
For
- The United Kingdom should remain a member state of the European Union. There is no reasoned argument that suggests it is a good idea for Britain to secede from the Union. All statements must be well qualified and backed up with citations where possible.
- Ladies and Gentlemen, at least those of you still reading, my opponents argument has descended into nothing more than a racist rant attacking Islam culture. While I do not condemn my opponent taking a stance on such a topic I believe that they have greatly diverged from the…
Against
- Pro: "Ladies and Gentlemen, at least those of you still reading, my opponents argument has descended into nothing more than a racist rant attacking Islam culture." My entire family was raised in Islam. 1)Islam is not a race. http://youtu.be... http://youtu.be... And if we…
- The UK needs to get away from the EU before it is too late and their entire culture is erased from planet Earth... Pro: "The EU is a place to solve problems and develop a community of nations, not discriminate or isolate out of fear or hatred." Ayaan Hirsi Ali, ex Muslim- "In…
- 685.
Essential state services should not be privatized
For
- Thanks to Con for diligently posting his arguments. I'll move on to my rebuttals right away. Rebuttal) 1. About his first rebuttal) I'll start from the back. First, about the government. I think Con may have misunderstood me. Let me try and explain things a bit more clearly. No…
- Thanks to my opponent for responding to my challenge so enthusiastically. Now I'm going to move on to my rebuttals. Rebuttal) 1. About that 'invisible hand'- My opponent has agreed that these corporations are more interested in profit. So, to repeat, because they want more…
Against
- To answer my opponent's question, robo-squirrels were, and may still be on development as part of the US's spy program. Yes, I know. Now, on to the matter at hand: Competition My opponent can be assured that I fully understood his point, and responded to it in my previous…
- 1. I was under the impression I had responded to this in my previous round, but perhaps I ought to elaborate. My opponent claims that a business's drive for profit will inspire it to reduce quality and "cut corners", endangering lives and providing weak service. However, the…
- 686.
Corruption is necessary for some societies to function
For
- My opponent has dismantled my argument, and due to lack of resources, I am unable to to provide a counter point.
- Corruption in the world must always be needed in the world. People will argue that corruption, whether it's in government or any other section, must be stopped. Corruption does hurt the General population as people do seek to gain money and power for there own gain like former…
Against
- (:
- I will, however, proceed to disseminate and rebut some of my opponent's more self-defeating statements. "Corruption does hurt the General population as people do seek to gain money and power for there own gain like former Administrator of General Services Martha N. Johnson. Yet…
- 687.
Electing a minority president would benefit the United States
For
- I think I understand what your saying. But in the case of Oprah,what if she endorsed Senator Barack Obama because of what she believes he can do for this country! Should she be harassed just because he happens to be black? I don't think so! I think that voting in a minority…
- I am in favor of a minority becoming president! As long as he/she can get the job done that they are elected to do!
Against
- In theory, you are right. But also in theory, communism is perfect and Hilliary does not have a vagina. moving on... IF they were elected in because they were good IF they were IF! the actuality is, they wouldn't be. There will always be a skewed vote. But lets assume we are in…
- First of all I am not a white supremacist and I agree with you, but I will play the devil's advocate in order to debate... Democracy- latin Demo -people cracy -clause meaning of in accordance to government thus the original definition of democracy was a government ruled by the…
- 688.
Governments should increase mass transportation infrastructure
For
- it will create more jobs
Against
- My opponent has forfeited this debate.
- Extend all of my arguments as true, since Round 2 was forfeited. Thank you.
- 689.
The US should prioritize domestic problems over foreign aid
For
- You want proof?http://www.globalissues.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.globalresearch.ca... World Trade Center not bombed?! If an airplane crashes into your house would you consider it a bombing? No wait, it's obviously a shooting...…
- I understand where you are getting at. 1% of our budget is not a lot. And over time the amount we spend is an investment.But here is where the argument starts:How much more will we need to spend? As I have stated, we spent 6 trillion US dollars to fight the War on Terror. You…
Against
- It's too late for proof. You waited till the last round to post links, so the arguments remain invalid. Also, wikipedia is not a valid link. Also, the majority of your arguments are not mentioned in these articles. "World Trade Center not bombed?! If an airplane crashes into…
- You have stated a lot of things, however none of them have been cited, so none of them are valid. Also, in the entire first section, you talk about human lives. Human lives are not a feasible currency, and therefor this entire section is invalid. "The World Trade Center was…
- 690.
Socialism is a bad economic system
For
- Please present argument in 3 point style, no Rebuttles until second round and 3rd round for closing statements. ----------------- 1. It promotes collectivism. Collectivism is when the government wants to sacrifice the rights of the individual for the better of the whole.…
- Alright, good debate,
Against
- Thanks for the debate, Pro. I'll present my opening arguments this round. Note that I do not have to show that socialism is an especially good political/economic system; I just have to show that it is not a fundamentally horrible system, as Pro claims. == CON CASE == 1.…
- I concede the debate. You win.
- 691.
Japan should not have expanded its Self-Defense Forces' powers
For
- My opponent have forfeited this round. However, I believe that this have the potential to be a very intuitive debate. If you wish, you could leave arguments in the comments section. I will try to respond.
- Abortion is not the topic of debate here. I of course wish we could still have a respectful and engaging debate. So, the first problem is domestic. Japan have survived for 70 years without a military that is allowed to fight overseas. In fact, the SDF is unconstitutional to…
Against
- Are you a retard, this is a step away from unneeded abortion.
- 692.
The US Congress should be shut down
For
- There is a lot of talk about taking back America...but no ACTION!!! You noticed in history, Americans took action against the British. So, how do we take it back??...you revolt. Oh, you dont want to die for freedom/change/take back...sooner or later, you or your children will…
Against
- Just to update the readers, my opponent has commented on my profile page that he does not intend to continue the debate.
- I'm not certain if I see a structure to my opponent's opening statement and challenge. I will accept the challenge on the assumption that he/she is arguing FOR the shutdown of government by means of refusal to pay taxes. With the recent debates on legislation on Capitol Hill…
- 693.
The United States should abolish political parties
For
- The United States should get rid of the Democrat, Republican, and all other political parties and have a bracket style elections.
Against
- As Pro has once again forfeited, I can only conclude that Pro has no arguments to offer. As the burden of proof lies with the Pro to uphold the resolution and substantiate his claim, and as Pro has neglected to both argue why the status quo party system is bad, and explain what…
- Due to a failure of the Pro side to offer any argumentation, all points flow to the Con side. I sincerely hope you intend to offer argumentation. I await your response.
- 694.
The United States is a faltering nation
For
- 1. On this point you basically argued we had global competitors in four groups: China, Russia, India, and Terrorists. Well, as for the first three, I agree they COULD fill the role we need, but the problem isn't that we lack candidates; the problem is that we lack a centric…
- Well, I'd be more than happy to get further in depth after my opponent brings up his points, but here are mine: The United States is on the decline. This is because of several reasons, not all of which are necessary for a downfall, but just contribute. 1. Lack of serious global…
Against
- That's alright, I've been away from the house lately, so I have not been able to check this. I look forward to your response.
- 1. The United States does have serious global competitors. We have China, which is growing at an incredibly fast pace economically and militarily. We have India, which is growing also. We have Russia, which is on the rebound and is also turning into a competitor. I agree that…
- 695.
Turkey should be accepted into the EU
For
- Precedent (Romania and Bulgaria)
- Turkey is a large country in European terms.
Against
- Fear of a Backlash Due to Turkey's Political and Religious Influences
- Free Labour Market - Turkish and Kurdish Migrants Would Flood to EU States with Better Living Standards
- 696.
Australia should pursue a much larger population
For
- *sigh*... One of these debates.... I hate this sh*t...
- So, Big Australia, as defined by the amazing Wikipedia, is "Big Australia is a term used by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to describe an increase in the population of Australia from 22 million in 2010 to 36 million in 2050 along with the policies needed to react to it. "…
Against
- Big Australia is the increase in the popuation of Australia due to the high numbers of immigrants coming in every day. I think that Big Australia is not a good idea, I will wait for Con to make the first argument.
- 697.
Civil society should have a greater role in African politics
For
- The involvement of CSOs promotes good governance practices
- Civil society's involvement in political life is necessary to strengthen democratic accountability
Against
- An excessively active civil society would increase political instability and paralyse African states
- The promotion of civil society is yet another form of the Western imperialism
- 698.
Participatory democracy is preferable to representative democracy
For
- Participatory forms of Democracy Can Restore Trust in Politics
- Representative Democracy Enables Rule by Elites
Against
- Referenda Produce Snap Decisions
- Representative Democracy Lets People Get On with their Lives
- 699.
The UK would have more influence outside the EU
For
- UK will be disentangled from EU affairs
- Britain will have greater ability to respond quickly
Against
- Leaving the EU will mean the UK will have less regional influence
- Power is shifting to the East
- 700.
Economic sanctions should not be used to achieve foreign policy goals
For
- Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this debate. I will quickly go over my points: 1) Sanctions are immoral because they violate human rights. I measure this by using Kant's Categorical Imperative. Basically the people are being used like tools in order to…
- I still stand in firm affirmation of the Resolution: economic sanctions ought not be used to achieve foreign policy objectives. I will first go through my opponent's case then with remaining time (characters) I will strengthen my own. My opponent's definition has no source and…
Against
- !! thanks in advance! !! !
- thanks to my opponent for answering cross ex! "Can an Economic Sanction be used for more than just issues involving a nation causing harm upon another? Explain." okat, i am assuming that they could be used to influence other things and i appologize, i know that this is your…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?