Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 12
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 551.
The United Nations should intervene in Syria
For
- Hey, my first debate. The topic, i'd like to introduce today to anyone who will choose to accept it is, Intervene in Syria, Which is current in a civil war. (Free syrian army and the government [President Bashar]) Thank you, and have a great debate. Civil war = War within the…
- Hey, my first debate. The topic, i'd like to introduce today to anyone who will choose to accept it is, Intervene in Syria, Which is current in a civil war. (Free syrian army and the government [President Bashar]) Thank you, and have a great debate. Civil war = War within the…
Against
- Well, my opponent forfeited, so I guess there is no need to elaborate on my arguments. I also strongly urge a con vote. If my opponent wants a rematch please comment and I will send a challenge ensuring that my opponent will not place short argument time frames.
- I accept your challenge. There are many contentions as to why an intervention is not a viable option. 1. Syria is not Libya. Syria has a larger population than Libya. Syria's population is also a sectarian time bomb with Sunni, Shiite (Alawite, Druze), Christians, and others.…
- 552.
Neutrality unless attacked is the best foreign policy
For
- This debate is based on whether neutrality unless attacked is best for a country and whether or not it is moral has nothing to do with this debate. You have no evidence to prove that the United States was attacked in World War II because of its trading and even if it was that…
- You say that neutrality did not work in either World War, but in fact, it worked very well. Let me guide you through a history of neutrality in the United States from its conception to present day. After the revolution, the United States was a weak colonial backwater, nothing…
Against
- First of all, the morality of this decision is very relevant to the debate because what is best for a country is a huge matter of opinion. Is what's best for a country standing up for our views and spreading democracy or is it looking out for ourselves first. I think that…
- You mentioned the revolutionary war. I would just like to point out that we would have not won this war if France had remained neutral and yet you're saying that we should and turn our backs on those who have helped us and those who need our help. By doing so you are…
- 553.
The United Nations is a force for good
For
- Thanks so much to Sitara for accepting! I'll do my best to affirm!I think that there are perhaps three key genres of activity that we can examine to evaluate the UN's impact on the world at large. Those genres are: poverty and development, health, and security. I will proceed…
- PrefaceSitara expressed interest in having a debate, and I suggested this topic to her. She asked me to challenge her, so I am looking forward to an interesting discussion.This debate has a 48 hour response period, with an 8,000 character maximum per round.Full TopicThat, On…
Against
- Thank you for the debate. Let's begin. I will list my reasons for opposing the UN. 1. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. If the wrong person gets in power, human rights abuses will be rampant. You can see this with the Roman Empire which often crucifies criminals or fed them…
- I accept.
- 554.
Fox News coverage is politically biased
For
- I would like to hit on some accusations made by my opponent before I make the essential points of my argument. My opponent has claimed that I glanced over points that he had made, this is one of the portion he refers to: "It is even susceptible to personal or corporate…
- Now i would like to remark on two points my opponent has made, and I quote: "Lest my opponent can prove otherwise with a preponderance of evidence, I would say that it is impossible for Fox to be any worse than any other locally or nationally syndicated news outlet in the…
Against
- I will address my final arguments in the same order that he chose to. First 2 Paragraphs (on his response to my point regarding standard level of media bias): 1. My opponent never proves that Fox viewers are more uninformed than any other demographic of news viewer. He simply…
- I appreciate my opponent's response, and will address some of the key issues brought forth by my opponent using his RD 1 order and tag lines. Point 1: In response to my arguments regarding the standard level of bias in the media, my opponent alleges that I make a false…
- 555.
Economic sanctions should not be used to achieve foreign policy goals
For
- I wish to go affirmative. This is meant to be a L.D. debate. I would like the following format: Affirmative Constructive 1 Negative Constructive 1/ Rebuttal 1 Affirmative Constructive 2 / Rebuttal 1 Negative Constructive 2 / Rebuttal 2 Affirmative Rebuttal 2 Use anything at…
- I know I lost this one...oh for a last argument...the war would be aimed at the governments...we are not that dumb. I know when I get in over my head, and this is a case of that. vote neg.
Against
- It's cool man. Extend everything. Yeah the only problem is that war doesn't actually happen like that. Sanctions are much safer and in any case should always come a step before we go to war.
- Start with the value debate. He says that Morality varies from person to person however just because people disagree on what morality is doesn't mean it doesn't exist as a peice of truth. Philosophy is the attempt to prove what is difinitively moral. For example I think the…
- 556.
The United States should suspend all assistance to Pakistan
For
- All points of my opponent are no longer valid due to the fact of my first point of Pakistan no longer wants or needs our aid also I will report the fact the supply routes were re-routed after 9\11 with a stream line connection of goods. As you can see my opponent no longer has…
- I will begin with the following observationsPakistan has rejected military aid. When the United States decided to cut 800 million in funding in pakistan the leader of the pakistani government stated that he no longer needs United States aid. Taliban recieves weapons from…
Against
- So I guess I made my point...
- Sorry. .. I'm new to this and i though the first round was only for constructive arguments. I thought it unfair to make arguments against my opponent for one more round than he could, so i will make my rebuttals in this round after defending my points. If my opponent had read…
- 557.
Theocracy should govern all nations
For
- I am pro communism*** so no I didn't attack it. I attacked attacks on it.
- I myself am a Nationalist-Socialist, I believe in contribution, effort, sacrifice, longevity, ambition and Prosperity. As such I am profoundly convinced that Theocracy is the ideal form of government. When a corrupt population can vote, we have a corrupt system. When an…
Against
- My opponent seems to have chosen to waive his round, thus I will do the same. The voters shall judge from round two. Vote me because none of my arguments were addressed.
- My opponent never supports his assertions. He never addresses that naturally laws are made prohibiting criminals from voting. In addition, most democratic societies require education, thus allowing the population to know more about the candidates and go research on them. People…
- 558.
A unified world government is not feasible at present
For
- I would disagree... The only way for any country to achive union with another, is by an agreement by both sides leaders... Simple philosopy and politics. But it is not FEASABLE because people will not give up their power once they achieve it, now yes there are some exceptions,…
- You are absolutely right, and i concede the fact that the idea for a singular world government is feasable. But as there is no such thing as a Unified World Government, it is only an idea, thus proving that it exists as it is right now. So this debate can only be about a "real"…
Against
- http://www.youtube.com...
- The entire pro side of this debate relies on the idea that if EVERYONE got on suddenly everyone would let power get to their head. This is a silly assumption.
- 559.
WikiLeaks was wrong to publish leaked documents online
For
- If I understand your position correctly you are arguing that Wikileaks did a good thing correct? Well considering I am arguing against you I must say that what was done was an attack on our national security. After Wikileaks released their cables foreign powers have done less…
- I'm sorry my opponent forfeited the last round but since that is what happened we must extend all my arguments across therefore I win.
Against
- This is open to anyone and everyone. I'm using this as a simple basis for my class debate on the same subject. I'm sorry if I don't use the proper format, this is my first online debate.
- I, myself, am not American. A true Canadian at heart, living in a country that has had very few leaks about political dealings. Why, you may ask? We guard our secrets well. We make sure we trust everyone in our government. After all, it isn't the media's job to guard political…
- 560.
Presidents should be allowed to serve more than two terms
For
- dude whatever
- I agree with the person that committed our debate we keep changing presidents and once you think about it it is not fair to presidents to come in and have to clean all the other presidents mess up and if they re lucky they might have time to do what they wanted to do and then…
Against
- Thank you
- My opponent has ignored all of my arguments, wow. My opponent claims that presidents don't have enough time to finish their job. Links please or that's untrue. Also you misspelled " Ronald Regan" its Ronald Reagan. Anyhow unless he deals with my arguments and proves his own,…
- 561.
The federal government should substantially reduce military weapons production
For
- The united states fed gv. should substantially decrease the production of militaqry warfare not only because it will save money but because it will also get troops out of foreign countries. By reducing military warfare we arent stopping our progress in foreign countries just…
- Spelling check please?
Against
- It is in our best interest and the country's being occupied for the U. S. to not pull out for their protection and ours. These bases may also help us deploy troops to areas hit by disasters and potential war zones in the future. These bases de[ending on location would be closer…
- Other countrys have basess positioned in other countrys so why should we have to pull out when other countrys are still occupying it??
- 562.
The United States should militarily intervene in Syria
For
- P1. There is a possibility that the same situation could happen in Somalia but we wouldn't"t know. It is better to try to help them then to stand by as thousands of people continue to die. To not risk the lives of thousands of lives would be the right term but to say American…
- P1. If there were a couple of innocent bystanders being killed then maybe it would not be worth going to war but this has been a conflict that has led to the death of more than 250,00 people as stated in the last report from the Human Right Council in 2013.…
Against
- P1: If there is a possibility the same situation that happened in Somalia could happen, like you said, then is best not to find out. We should help humanitarianly, but not military. More deaths is not going to solve the problem. Let the country work it on its own. P2: You said"…
- P1: The risk of thousands of American lives is not worth intervention. We could possibly have the same outcome as the situation in Somalia. We wouldn't want to risk a repeat of Somalia. http://www.pbs.org... P2: The deadline is in June. And they are speeding up the process in…
- 563.
Post-9/11 security measures have gone too far
For
- I accept your challenge! I look forward to a very constructive debate with you.
- OMG those poor ducks lolStay tuned for this redo come Friday.
Against
- My opponent forfeited
- Thanks for accepting. Howard Kunreuther once said that when analyzing the benefits of post 9/11 security measures, we cannot look to the question of "are we safer" but rather "How much should we be willing to pay for a small reduction in probabilities that are already extremely…
- 564.
The American militia movement remains relevant in modern society
For
- Well, this has been a disappointment. My arguments remain, I'm going to claim the win in absence of a counter argument.
- Nothing?
Against
- Full ResolutionMilitias are not relevant in todays society. .DefinitionsMilitia: noun 1. a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency. "creating a militia was no answer to the army's manpower problem" Rules1. The first…
- 565.
The president should be elected by Congress
For
- I see where you are coming from.. but I still strongly agree that this plan system would benefit the United States greatly. I mean look at Britain, you rarely hear of political problems because the Prime Minister is selected to be the same political party as the majority party…
- Yes but if we do not trust or like the officials we select, then why do we vote for them, if we don't like them? That is a problem with politicians and not how the government is structured. If people do not like the choices their officials in Congress are making then they…
Against
- I, too, understand why you believe this system would work. You gave an example of Britain where a similar system works very well. Though, there are examples of why this system would not work. Let's look at our county's government again. When Obama-care first was proposed, they…
- I do not deny that the system is plausible, though I am saying that it will not be able to be reached, and even if it is, we are not able to ensure that it would work. For example, let's look at the example of Obama right now. I am not against Obama, but his Presidency is a…
- 566.
The world should adopt a single world government
For
- We humans are our own worst enemy. We have to unite under one flag or parish from our own self destruction. This is the sad truth of the human race."Only two things are infinite, the universe and humanity and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."Albert Einstein…
- "Where does it say so, in the last 50 years the nr of countries has actually risen as larger countries are divided. EU is also deep into massive problems that makes more people wanting to go out and dependable on what happens to Greece, Italy the future of EU might be very…
Against
- Well, as TheMoose forfeited these last rounds I guess I cant do much more. The sources I have used during the debate. . http://www.rome.info... (the fall of rome) . http://www.europeanvoice.com... (support for EU is at an all time low) . http://rt.com... (the problem with open…
- As my opponent forfeited his last round I will continue with what I missed in the last round. "Companions would be strictly regulated to prevent the situation that our government is in now." Yet again, good intentions but how is this going to be implemented? The companies got…
- 567.
Democracy is the most desirable form of government
For
- Oh well...
- KC has asked that this debate go unvoted since he deactivated his account. I would, however, like to continue this debate later if he is amenable.
Against
- No votes. Good luck to bsh in the WODC!
- Responding to my opponent semantics play, democracy has indeed been defined as a "form of government in which supreme power is vested in the people, or exercised by them or by their elected agents under a free and fair electoral system" Note the words electoral system. This…
- 568.
The EU has handled Poland and Hungary poorly
For
- I think that the EU has done a terrible job in regards of trying to force countries like Poland or Hungary into welcoming Migrants.
- The problem with what you just said is, That they do. Hungary voted for not taking any migrants and EU wants to punish them for doing so. This is not democracy. And yes leaving might be a point, But as you said, It is death to leave. Your words. As said, Forcing a county to do…
Against
- They don't have to join if they don't want to, In fact even when they do no one forces them to take immigrants do they? No one even forces them to balance heir bloody budget even though they should, As i said the eu was better when it was just be ne lux germany france tialy and…
- I know a bit about the EU, My family is from the netherlands and i know being in the eu is really benificial to a small nation. In my opinion Charles de Gaulle was correct when he opposed entry of the UK, The common market should have been limited to the benelux italy france…
- 569.
The US trade embargo on Cuba should be lifted
For
- First off, I don't think it's fair to compare Iraq and Cuba. They have similar political structures yes, but besides that, they have virtually nothing in common. The scenario you described in paragraph four about Castro's wealth is invalid. From the time he was paid by the USSR…
- I disagree with your statement that the embargo is hurting Castro. This embargo is keeping him in power. The economic instability has weakened the Cuban people and has made them complacent to the dictatorship. Recent interviews with big Cuban dissidents have shown that even…
Against
- The 100 year old investment-banking firm of Warburg, Dillon Read (on Park Ave. N.Y.) (now UBS Warburg) has offices in 39 foreign countries - including the Bahamas, the tiny Cayman Islands, Hong Kong and the Channel Islands. Makes you wonder why, doesn't it? Non-resident foreign…
- To set the background for my reasoning behind one aspect of the answer in the affirmative would be to use the sanction/embargo policy setup in Iraq during Saddam Hussein's period of rule as a parallel. Pro has been promoting the idea that the USA should rescind their policy of…
- 570.
Every society should aim for a modern democracy
For
- Extend all of my arguments and refutations of his case.
- Ill start with my opponent's case. (REFUTE) His observation 1) "Therefore the affirmative burden is to prove that ALL societies want a democracy. " My opponent completely misconstrues the resolution. The resolution is not that all societies want a democracy, only that a…
Against
- I negate: A modern form of democracy should be the goal of every society For clarity I offer the following definitions: 1. Modern Democracy: representative government; indirect democracy 2. Goal: a result one is attempting to achieve 3. Every: the total amount 4. Society: group…
- 571.
The United States should withdraw from the United Nations
For
- == Conclusion == Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited R2, giving me nothing to respond to. As a final re-cap I'd like to point out that the United Nations has proven to be a corrupt and ineffective organization. The United States is responsible for 1/4 of the funding despite…
- Thanks, Con! == Defense of Contentions == 1. Con admits that the UN is a corrupt organization with little credibility. He says that US withdrawal would further corrupt the group. If we're not funding it, then it doesn't matter to us where other countries choose to spend their…
Against
- Thank you, L, for starting this debate. I hope to provide lots of clash and for it to be fun, interesting, and overall friendly. Just to clarify before I begin, I will go down my opponents case and then set up mine. For a heads-up, the thesis I base my case around is that the…
- 572.
The international community should support French intervention in Mali
For
- France intervention in Mali was justified in a case of dangerous islamist incursions in the north part of the country and the developpement of aqmi in the region. French troops are doing a good job with the support of African troops. But other NATO countries should provide more…
Against
- You forfeited the last round, if you really want to debate start it again.
- Seeing that you forfeited this round again, I do not know if you are taking this seriously.
- 573.
The US would be justified in using military force to stop nuclear proliferation
For
- First off, your arguments about the middle east are invalid since they are the ones that would be acquiring the nuclear weapons. If we were to invade the Middle East to prevent the acquisition, it wouldn't matter because they would be our enemies, not our allies. You also…
- Hegemony is defined as: economic and military dominance. As the world hegemon, it is not only reccomended but neccesary for US to police the world. If you disagree with this point, you disagree with the fact that the US is the world hegemon. At that point I would like to ask…
Against
- Alright friendo this is what I'm saying. The reason why terrorist groups in the Middle East and countries like Iran dislike us and are threatening to destroy us is because of our foreign policy of the last 35 years. If we minded our own business much like the founding fathers…
- Yes, however hegemony has its limits. The USA is now, thanks to their aggressive foreign policy, not only in countries they have a rocky relationship with ( the Middle East) but also allies, like many European nations. I almost received a beating in an Irish Pub in 2004 just…
- 574.
The United States should be divided into independent nations
For
- Opening Argument: The USA is a nation born on the ideals and promises of the Revolutionary era, a time when philosophers and the common man started to question the status quo of monarchic rule. Some fled to the New World, seeking a life on the frontiers, but as these fledgling…
- Hi all! So, I'll be using this first round to just lay the groundwork. My opponent can start the argument in the response, or just accept. As for rules, no trolling, personal insults, or anything like that. Basically, just be polite! Any source is ok That's all!
Against
- Utöka alla argument (Extend all arguments in Swedish)
- Ymestyn yr holl ddadleuon (Extend all arguments in Welsh)
- 575.
The United States should decrease its military spending
For
- Thanks for accepting to be part of this debate. The United States should decrease military spending for the following reasons: 1. The United States doesn't need a stronger military, first of all it already is. Secondly, the United States is part of NATO. If the United States…
Against
- Everyone please ignore this debate
- Ok here goes try number two lol."The United States doesn't need a stronger military, first of all it already is"Yes, it is true that the United States has the worlds strongest military. However, just because you are already that strong does not mean you don't have to maintain…
- 576.
Voting should be compulsory in the UK
For
- Decrease apathy
- Cause more people to become interested in politics
Against
- Compulsory Voting Does not enhance democracy
- Voting does not make sense as a rewardable/punishable action.
- 577.
The electoral college should allocate votes by actual voter numbers
For
- I believe so, our political system seems to be crumbling from the lack of voters that is plaguing our nation. When we look at an average person and the person who votes, usually the person who votes is the one who wants the change the most. The majority of young people have no…
- I'm glad you brought up the Voter ID laws actually. When it comes to the idea of changing the electoral college to the number of voters per state, having these laws can be a huge disadvantage. In history many Southern and more conservative states have always felt they needed to…
Against
- The electoral college should not be changed to registered voter counts over actual population numbers. Congress members are chosen relative to a states population, which in turn determines the number of electoral college votes. All members of a given population from birth to…
- With the DMV closings; using the fact that the population being served is at only 5% of the total of all Alabama DMV transactions is poignant, especially if 75% of the population in these counties is black. Through your reasoning, I believe you are making the point for me that…
- 578.
The presidency's power should be reduced
For
- Oh Please Trump will Be Blamed for WW3 Trump Did Not Even have Any Politcal Experiance Before Hand so Why Would a Rich Buisness Man be a Good President In Fact They Have too Much Power Most Executive Orders Should be Placed Through Congress do i have to remind you if how the…
- i personally think trump will destroy the world with his wall and mean behavior
Against
- I will be arguing that the presidancy's power in America should NOT be reduced in anyway. I will also be arguing that President Trump is an effective president that will do well for the USA. First off. The wall. Donald Trump says he will be creating a wall to keep illeagle…
- Alright to finish this off. The president's powers should not be reduced. Trump has great policies, just unfortunate the main stream media brainwashed the Americans that are swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool. Now to respond to your arguments against myself. "You are…
- 579.
Bashar al-Assad should step down from power
For
- Alright, my opponent has no intrest in debating this. If he did, he would of used R4 to defend his points, instead of posting two articles he didn't write, that didn't relate anything to the debate. All my refutation the past two rounds has been completely dropped by my…
- I. Con's "88% of votes" argumentI believe our dearest Kiim Jung Un was elected by 100% of the votes, and that's with a population of about 25 million. The problem with the "so called" Syrian elections, is that they weren't the sligt bit democratic. That same 75% of the world…
Against
- Lets start off by enjoying this song . () . My opponent started off claiming that the elections in Syria where not democratic and compared them to elections in DPRK . There are big differences between the two and Bashar al-Assad did not win by 100% . 'If you suspect that any…
- My opponent has said 'I want to start by saying, its absolutely absurd that Slavic has given me the BOP. I will let the audience decide if I should truly be held by it. With that said, I am going to ignore much of my opponents OP. Refuting it does not defeat the BOP which I may…
- 580.
National defense should be privatized
For
- Any reader will likely be very skeptical of the idea that the private sector could provide something as large and as important as national defense. How could it be financed? Who would set up its infrastructure? Wouldn't private defense agencies cut corners to increase profit?…
- I start this debate to challenge the almost universally accepted idea that national defense can only be provided by government. I will show that not only could the free-market provide protection from foreign attack, it would be far more efficient and enthusiastic than any…
Against
- The notion that something as important and vital as national security should be provided for by something as fickle and disingenuous as private sector corporations and Insurance companies is throughly absurd. And I intend to prove with my arguments that a private military would…
- I accept.
- 581.
The US Electoral College should be abolished
For
- The electoral college violates the democratic principle that the winner should be the candidate receiving the most votes.
- The electoral college weakens incentives for voting and party building.
Against
- The electoral college forces candidates to win broad coalitions across the country, encouraging national harmony.
- The electoral college prevents a tyranny of the majority.
- 582.
The United States should stop spying on other countries
For
- Sorry i am withdrawing from this debate since i understood my mistakes.
- I think that the Us should stop spying on other countries mainly the European nations.Because the US is spying on other countries they are getting angry and agitated because of this spying,mainly the US and obama had said in berlin that our spying has saved many lives ,i would…
Against
- Thanks
- I understand.
- 583.
Taxpayers should be allowed to dictate how governments spend their money
For
- This was due to my attending a Chinese wedding which lasted, as they do, most of the weekend, thus leaving me no opportunity to post an argument, or at least not a sober one! Anyway, I hope my opponent understands and doesn't consider my forfeit in any way disrespectful. In his…
- Let's say that the Poles, the Danes and the Serbs decide to form a federation and they call their new country, I don't know, The Poledanser Republic. Now, in the spirit of true democracy, the government of this newly formed nation allow all tax-paying Poledansers to decide how…
Against
- Absolutely no problem Brian! Now to start off, "opponent observed that the government would still distribute tax receipts so that >>>>> this will limit the taxpayers control, This is true, and also a good thing. <<<<<" My opponent has conceded his resolution. By default all…
- Arguments extended
- 584.
Foreign aid should be conditional on human rights records
For
- Tying aid to human rights puts pressure on countries to act responsibly
- Jordanian journalists protest a 48% increase in U.S funding after a negative report by human rights' watch on the Jordanian govt
Against
- Government and citizens are often not the same entity.
- 585.
The European Union should expand further
For
- New entrants are unlikely to wreak havoc on the EU's workings just because they have not enacted all...
- Enlargement will undermine the Common Agricultural Policy, but this should be welcomed. The CAP's s...
Against
- Expansion strains EU institution and hampers decision-making, action.
- EU environmental regulations will cost new member states
- 586.
The world should pressure North Korea to change
For
- please further to the real debate...http://www.debate.org......
- ignore this debate.
Against
- The voting period for the other debate is about to begin.
- TO ALL READING THIS: http://www.debate.org... The new debate ^
- 587.
Public appointments should not favor friends and family
For
- Many thanks to Hatstand for the debate. I do concur on the matter of sanity and logic – the whole point of this debate in a way. I hope the audience has had their fun. I had originally planned for more political issues but Con's R1 truly surprised me and left us with the…
- I should say though that there are more serious debates than this to be had. I must confess, I'm bemused that Con suspects I'm not acting in a sane manner in my arguments. Saying that this debate is 'logically pointless' . .. tut tut. My arguments illuminate certain ways in…
Against
- I hope that the manner in which I responded has not kept you from enjoying this debate, as it did not cover the topics you thought it would. I never intended this to turn into a full on battle of the sexes, merely to show the holes in your logic. I did try to respond equally to…
- I would also like to point out that logic and sanity are not the same thing. While I do not believe all of the arguments I used in my last post were sane, I do believe they were all perfectly logical. Also, I apologise if my prose is somewhat lacking. I too have been rather…
- 588.
The EU is on the verge of collapse
For
- Well i can have several valid reasons why i think the EU gonna collapse. 1: It was EU fault that Greece is gonna leave the Eurozone, borrowing money from the EU owing back the bailout plus with interest will probably leave them with no money, so Greece has no choice to leave…
- If Greece leaves the EU is it possible that a "Domino Effect" could start to unravel the fabric of all EU Countries?
Against
- Round 3 Forfeit by Opponent. What else is there left to say.
- Greece is in the sh*ter because they can't control their spending. Don't blame EU because Greece needed to borrow money in the first place just because they cant pay back the interest due to their incompetence. They will likely be kicked out for their own actions not, the EU's.…
- 589.
Missile defense systems are unnecessary
For
- Refutations1) I'm sorry I misread Con's first point, so now I will make a valid refutation against it. You stated the only areas in the United States that have nuclear weapons are Alaska and California, yet this is invalid information.As you can see in this graph [1] it shows…
- My refutations will be accordance to his points, so for his first point my first refutation will be one as well.1) The fact that other nations and territories have missle defenses isn't a valid reason for the U.S to have them. Just becuase slavery wasn't judged as a misdeed…
Against
- 1. The U.S. obvesouly ha nukes we know this, but my friend you yet aain mistook my info I said we have GBI in those states and they aren't effective 2. resovled 3. The Pro is saying the explotion of the nuke is more important isue than a U.S. without power. No electriciy for…
- 1. I never said other countries had GBIs 2. GBI is Ground Base Intecptors. 3. Pro only talks about a nuclear devise not a EMP which would fry the U.S. powe grid... How do we know this well the U.S. in the 1980s did a test. 4. The Pro has dropped this arguement don't let him…
- 590.
The government takes too much responsibility for people's actions
For
- 'Are you saying you would deny someone medical treatment because they have less money than you? ' I would like to point out that I also come from a lower middle class family and I respect the fact that you don't have the security net of a NHS in your country. Some may say we're…
- Definition - I refer to the government of the UK but the argument may be applied to other governments. I believe the government is a system that tends to simply makes certain peoples' hard efforts (money ascertained from taxes etc.) and convert them into a cushioning device…
Against
- giving up everyone should vote for my opponent
- Now to the issues. Second I live in America in the lower middle class with very limited health care. I would give anything to have the comfort of knowing if something happens I can get the medical care I need. You should be grateful that you have that. "I believe the government…
- 591.
Quebec should become a sovereign nation
For
- Again, I am sorry. I didn't use the civil war comments as that was already discussed by my professor. Vote con by all means. I was merely a desperate student, as surely some can relate to being screwed over at the last minute on some project or another and having to rush. I…
- Yeah, again I've got nothing. I'm anti-separatism...
Against
- Sigh...whatever My opponent says in the comments section that he intended to use this round to plagiarize my arguments and use them in a school project. Independent reason to vote con. He then promised me a good debate to make up for it - oh well. He could have at least tried…
- Burden of proof: My opponent, as the instigator and the one who is advocating for change from the status quo, has the burden of proof. Framework: My opponent seems to be arguing that the round should be weighed based on what policy action is most beneficial to the citizens of…
- 592.
People do not need the state to help them live
For
- I remind you that the challenge is to provide one government function necessary that could not be provided without the State in place. In other words, you are still free to add topics to your list but as of now I will only debate protection (police and military) and law-making.…
- Since this is a pretty long subject, I don't want to spend too much time talking about the structure of the debate and I would like to start it right away. As a summary, I begin by posting my first argument and my opponent will answer right away. To define the State, I am…
Against
- I can tell this will be a very good, respectful debate, and I am looking forward to the coming rounds. Protection - Police My opponent points out that private companies should be able to provide significant amounts of protection for citizens, and the study indicates that there…
- So I hereby challenge any opponent to offer me a single function where government is needed. I will accept my opponent's challenge. Protection: A government is meant to first and foremost provide protection for the people. If the government did not provide protection through…
- 593.
Japan has acted as a bully in East Asia
For
- Sorry; it seems that I have forgotten to post something and the timer went out- let's continue the debate. The Con side has not explained anything about what JAPAN has done, either. Please do not expect something out of me if you are not proving it from my point, either.…
- Your statement that "Japan has nevergone to war on Diaoyu Islands or resorted to violence" cannot be more incorrect. When China told Japan that the islands needed to be taken care by the ICJ, Japan denied it and refused to go to court. This means that Japan is favoring…
Against
- "The Con side has not explained anything about what JAPAN has done, either" The burden of proof has lied on the pro side and I have refuted all the claims he has presented. He claimed to say Japan was the "bully" of East Asia but has failed in showing any proof whatsoever.…
- My opponent has forfeited this round.
- 594.
The European Union should be a trade bloc rather than a political union
For
- A European political union is by necessity undemocratic
- A European trade bloc can succeed without a political union
Against
- Political union has numerous non-economic benefits which a trade bloc lacks
- European integration has been immensely beneficial to EU economies
- 595.
Military conscription is unjust
For
- Ill start by defining the topic Military Conscription is known as the draft where the military forces teens and older to join the military. Contention 1 It has been realized by people 30 years ago that this is a bad idea. During the Vietnam war hundreds of people skipped out…
- I concede the round and withdraw from the tournament sorry to have wasted your time in this debate..
Against
- Acknowledged. As well, on the contrary, I would hardly denote this debate to be without purpose. I have learned a lot, myself, from arguing from the given viewpoint I was already supplied. I consider debate to be a progressive search for truth, in the realm of mystery. Thus,…
- Alllrighty then: "This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time." It is seemingly unclear as to how this counteracts my assertions and points of contentions made in my Round 1. I fail to see any rebuttal continuity. Therefore,…
- 596.
The US government is weakening the Constitution
For
- First, I never said amendments were decimating the Constitution. I said interpretations were doing so. The actions by the justice system (and others that I was going to present), are not changes they are the decimating behaviors. Below is Article V as copied and pasted from the…
- Since Con forfeited the last round, I will add just a little. Although I have more about other parts of the Constitution I will stay with Justice here. A person can have personal property confiscated without charges or a trial. This violates both innocent and search an seizure…
Against
- Your arguement is irrelevent considering it is the gov. right to change or as you see it "decimate" the constitution.
- You do realize the government has a right to amend the constitution in any way it sees fit? 1. An answer to that is simply that if they are convicted would you want to risk another crime being committed by that person wouldn't you rather be safe than sorry? Say a person was a…
- 597.
The United States should increase its military budget
For
- Yes the US spends more than our competitors like China. However this is necessary for several reasons. The U.S. maintains military bases across the globe. In order to uphold our presence worldwide these bases need our funding. Some may not like it but it is also undeniable the…
- Bring it o Byaka
Against
- You seem not to understand that your logic applies to every other major country. China has a 215 billion budget. Let"s say they want to decrease it. The Chinese version of you would say, "But we need it for our military bases, etc." We have 800 military bases around the world,…
- Right- the current US military budget is about 597 billion, soon to possibly increase to 651 billion. According to http://www.globalfirepower.com..., the US has 8848 tanks, 41062 AFVs, 13444 aircraft, 1.4 million active personnel with 1.1 million in reserve. We have *12*…
- 598.
All veto powers of individual EU member states should be lifted
For
- Unanimity requirement gives an enormous bargaining leverage to the hands of individual states
- Disposing of unanimity requirement would make it easier advance the long-needed federalization of the European Union
Against
- Qualified majority voting (QMV – an alternative to the unanimity requirement) favors big states and marginalizes the others
- Disposing of the unanimity requirements is essentially only hidden federalization of the European Union
- 599.
Citizens should be responsible for ensuring national security
For
- I think I totally disagree with you. You are actually not 'FORCED' to carry out these responsibilities. It is that when you wish to become a citizen of a country, these are some of the 'terms and conditions' that you should make note of before you apply to become one And if you…
- The issue of state's security concerns all individuals and hence it becomes a joint responsibility of both the state and citizens. While the state keeps its machinery well oiled with periodic reviews and upgrades, the capacity building of the common man remains a matter of…
Against
- I maintain a very simply principle. A principle that almost everyone agrees with. It is called assent. This is a term used in a contract to describe that both members of the party assent to the arguments at hand. Furthermore, without assent, the contract is not a binding nor a…
- I'll have to simply extend my further arguments and rebuttals since they were not addressed.
- 600.
Democracy is the best form of government
For
- Judges please note: This round is exclusively for arguments, no rebuttals should be made in this round. I will in the following paragraphs try to uphold the resolution that though democracy has its flaws, it still is better than all the other forms of government that have been…
- Round 1: Acceptance and opening statement Round 2: ArgumentsRound 3: Rebuttal and closing statement Opening statement: "Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried."~ Winston Churchill
Against
- Since there are only three rounds of debate, I will start with definitions and criteria here... Definitions: Democracy, noun, government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected…
- I will argue that there is exactly one form of Government better than a Democracy. A Republic. A Republic recognizes that all people have certain inalienable rights, that can not be taken by any just government. In a pure Democracy you have the risk of Tyranny by the Majority.…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?