Economy Debate Topics — page 25
1,397 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1201.
The minimum wage should be $10 an hour and adjust for inflation
For
- Rules: 1. No statistics without a reference. My argument is that The minimum wage should be decent enough so that people doing easy jobs can still make a decent living and that the ones making millions of dollars in bonuses don't need it.
Against
- This, my friends, has been a full forfeit. Extend all arguments.
- Unfortunately, my opponent has forfeited this round.Extend all arguments.
- 1202.
Tax rates should be progressive
For
- A well-implemented progressive taxation scheme serve to promote economic growth
- Those able to pay more should pay more into the tax system
Against
- The ability to orchestrate a progressive taxation regime gives undue and dangerous power to the state
- Progressive taxes place an unfair and disproportionate burden on the wealthy
- 1203.
Cities should block Chick-fil-A franchises from opening on city perimeters
For
- Extend all arguments across the flow.
- In this debate, I affirm the resolution and stand on the PRO. Thesis: The freedom of speech can be limited (philosophically) in circumstances where its exercise causes harm to society or inhibits democracy. Because Chick-Fil-A's stance on gay rights issues brings an obstruction…
Against
- Can you give one good reason?
- Since you did not respond I will not take advantage of round 5. I will merely restate my most important point: In refusing to allow free speech or the opening of stores you set yourself up as an enemy of freedom. And since your lack of response could be misconstrued as an…
- 1204.
Minimum wage laws should be abolished
For
- Definitions "A minimum wage is the lowest hourly, daily, or monthly wage that employers may legally pay to employees or workers. Equivalently, it is the lowest wage at which workers may sell their labor." http://en.wikipedia.org... The "having an economic effect" caveat in the…
- My opponent has forfeited, so all my previous arguments stand unrefuted. The data are overwhelming that minimum wage laws cause unemployment, especially among teenagers. If Con's argument were correct, that increased costs would be absorbed out of employer profits, the laws…
Against
- I agree to your definition, but reserve the right to challenge any should I choose to do so. I will start by refuting my opponents contentions then move onto my own. "1. Consider an example that is a paradigm for the arguments against a minimum wage. Fast food restaurants…
- i think people should get payed what they deserve. if you are not working then you need to get payed what you deserve.
- 1205.
Customers should not feel obligated to tip servers
For
- Realizing that defeat is inevitable, the once mighty Yraelz flees in terror like a scared kitten! A real shame as I don't get to use my field spell card!Thanks for the debate!Vote PRO!Logical Master
- REBUTTING CON's CASE!!!Turapu kado hatsudo!!!Not so fast! I reveal my face down card, Unjustifiable Assumption! At the cost of 1882 characters, I can destroy any argument from my opponent that is premised upon an unjustifiable assumption! Here, both of my opponents arguments,…
Against
- Aloha to my opponent and those voters who will eventually vote for me. Although I typically maintain a cordial demeanor in my debates I would ask to be excused in advance for this one. On such a heated topic I can only justify my opponent's stance as the ravings of a class 7…
- It's time to d-d-d-d-duel!!!
- 1206.
Free trade should be valued above protectionism
For
- Im going to start with attacking my opponets case then preceed in defending my own. my opponet has failed in this round to relate any part of this debate to the criterion, majority rule, this is because the negative viewpoint is based on a minority of people. these people being…
- my opponet has accepted my value and criterion and has made note of the fact that i have the burden to prove free trade is good and that he dosent have to prove protectionism is good only that free trade is bad, therefore whomever proves that quality of life and majority rule…
Against
- http://www.youtube.com...
- http://www.youtube.com...
- 1207.
Individuals should be able to opt out of Social Security
For
- Because my opponent did not submit an argument, I continue to advocate which I stated in the previous round. In closing, I am not against the idea of Social Security. I think that it was a necessary program in the era of the Great Depression and World War 2 to help lift America…
- My opponent did not submit an argument last round so therefore I shall start. Social Security is a "Ponzi" scheme [1]. The money that gets automatically deducted from people's paychecks each month does not go into a savings fund somewhere, it goes into the pockets of a current…
Against
- Hello, I am OpticalLegend and accept this challenge as the Con side. This is an important debate and I hope to clear some misconceptions and fallacies which manifest themselves on the Pro side of this debate. Thank you.
- 1208.
Beer in the UK is too expensive
For
- Hi, thanks for accepting. This is my first debate (on this website I mean!), so go easy! Cider is my most favourite drink in the world. A Pint of Thatchers Gold in my local on a warm day is just above the birth of my child in terms of highlights. However... Beer in the UK in my…
- When I talk about beer, i'm referring to lager, cider, bitter, dark beer, and generally ale in all it's existences. I think given how fundamental it is to our culture in the UK, making the price of it prohibitive is wrong, and is possibly doing more harm than good.
Against
- Good luck Bostacle, and thanks for making the debate!
- Extend.
- 1209.
Capitalism is inherently flawed and overall detrimental
For
- There are many reasons as to why capitalism is flawed and not something to be praised: 1. Alienation of the means of production and the commodity from the worker Capitalism cannot exist without the means of production (i.e. the factories where one works, the tools and machines…
- Capitalism is a system doomed to crises. Accept if you're willing for an argument with a strong Marxist who does actually know economics.
Against
- Thanks to PRO for kicking this off.I however would claim that PRO has failed in terms of addressing the topic at hand. The issue is whether Capitalism is inherently flawed and overall detrimental. PRO has only tried to address the former and has not touched upon the latter at…
- Good luck!
- 1210.
Municipalities should set their own minimum wages
For
- Currently, in my country at least, the level of minimum wage is determined by provincial legislatures, and I belive it is similiar in the United States as well. Yet does this really make sense? Provinces, states, and nations can be very large entities, and no one can really…
Against
- Everyone, please vote me because I have right to win with this debate. First, Farooq only show us his own writings. But, He does not any response related to my opposition. It is his abstention. I waited his response, and even I demanded his reply. But He didn't anything. So,…
- Farooq, please reply against my writings in the round 1. If you do not, you have lose this debate. And, brian_eggleston. Anyway, You won the debate. I think my mistake is more serious than yours in the debate. Still, I have less talent than many other debaters in this site. I…
- 1211.
The United States should abolish the capital gains tax
For
- The government get's money a lot of other ways then just capital gains taxes. your showing a same part. The capital gains tax harms economic performance. It turns out that there are many reasons why the capital gains tax harms economic performance. Clemens, Lammam and Lo…
- Only certain types of businesses can TAKE advantage of this tax. That being said, Not all businesses can take advantage of this beneficial 20% rate. C corporations, for example, are not able to leverage capital gains , unlike an S corporation or LLC, the income does not flow…
Against
- look ok if the gov does not get money we would not have an army
- if the gov would not get any money there will be an anarchy
- 1212.
Too-big-to-fail policies harm long-term economic growth
For
- One final chance for opposition.
- If we look into the longer term economic horizon we see that the subsidisation of an economic entity to necessitate its survival will lead to the peril of that entity. We can look at the disaster of GM, which we are still bailing out because of the governments failure to let…
Against
- Concession.
- Concession.
- 1213.
Foreign direct investment benefits developing economies
For
- FDI is useful for our country in every sense for it will not only bring new infrastructure to our land but will also provide competitive environment. The wastage of agricultural produce can be hindered or atleast reduced. It will enable the farmers get better price for their…
Against
- I see my views go unopposed.
- Same as above.
- 1214.
Monopolies should be illegal
For
- Apple owns the monopoly for the IPAD...I fail to see how this supports your argument, so I won't refute it. All of this true.Wal-Mart...Wal-Mart does not yet have a monopoly on stores. If it did, there would be no motivation for low prices, because people couldn't shop anywhere…
- Reason 1: Monopolies do not benefit the consumer.If a company has a monopoly on a product, there is a pretty good chance that it is going to charge customers through the nose for it. The company, after all, has complete assurance that nobody can offer the product at a lower…
Against
- Explanation for Apple v Samsung: The courts have interested Apple has having the monopoly on the IPAD via a patent, it clearly states this numerous times within the transcripts: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com... , http://www.slate.com... The reason for this claim…
- Apple v Samsung. Although Apple own the monopoly for the IPAD, it does not own the rights to the cheaper Samsung where the courts found that it was not abusing its monopoly power as Samsung originally asserted. Furthermore, it was found that, although the Samsung product looked…
- 1215.
The Federal Reserve is harming the American economy
For
- Sources : THE CONSTITUTION OF OUR COUNTRY" By Frank A. Rexford -- 1924 I believe the federal reserve system is destroying America, and has been since it's birth. "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American…
Against
- PRO has forfeited every round and refused to respond to my arguments.Therefore, you vote CON. Thank you.
- This is disappointing, but I'll refrain from posting arguments in this round, and allow my adversary the chance to post in the next round.
- 1216.
Capitalism is in decline and will eventually fail
For
- Thank you Domr for accepting the challenge. Within the last century, capitalism has transformed most of the world into an industrial economy and has indeed successfully increased our production and technological innovation. Though, capitalism, in the traditional sense, is now…
- Pro will argue that capitalism is dying. Con will argue that capitalism is not dying. Capitalism Definition (Investopedia)A system of economics based on the private ownership of capital and production inputs, and on the production of goods and services for profit. The…
Against
- First, I would like to point out my opponent has not used any sources to show data regarding the fall of jobs, the increase in solar panel usage and its benefits, and breakdowns of the next decade of the "Fall of capitalism".Now to quickly respond to any jobs lost over the…
- I accept. As Con, I will be refuting my opponents argument of "Capitalism is Dying". Good luck.
- 1217.
Some corporations are too big to fail
For
- I've been trying to decide whether to be mean and post a full round or to just be nice and post nothing. I've decided to post what I had already typed up PRIOR to darkkermit's forfeit, since it's not my fault he couldn't post his argument. Here we are: I'll begin with a very…
- Thanks for an interesting topic darkkermit. It is one I (claim to) know a great deal about. The Glass-Steagall Act, passed during the Great Depression, prevented the merger of commercial banks, investment banks, and insurance companies. There were good reasons for doing so, as…
Against
- Many thanks to my opponent, bluesteel. The role of profits:Profits are a signal that demonstrate that a good or service is demanded by society. For example, people buy food, clothing, and such because these goods and services are desirable. Profits = Revenue - Expenses. If…
- Wow I did not have access to the internet, and didn't realize how little time I had left once I went to the local library. There's still 3 rounds available for debating, so do you mind skipping this round? Sorry about that. :p.
- 1218.
The United States should significantly reduce government spending
For
- i would cut head start. section 8 housing. cut or significantly trim meals on wheels. significnatly cut depatment of education. i coudl go on and on with what should be reduced if you admit efficiencies can be found, that usually means spending can be reduced. otherwise they…
- con argues instead of cutting spending, he basically says we should increase taxes. he didnt use that jargon, cause it's poison. i would agree tax increases is a good thing, but would posit it needs to be a balanced approach. there are surely places where spending could be…
Against
- I have waited for you to post another comment so I could include it in this post and then move back to defending my own arguments, and agreeing with or contradicting some of your arguments. I have waited two days but it seems you have given up on this debate. - Department of…
- - Cutting specific programs Could you name a few of those programs that shouldn't exist? While it is clear that basically all government programs could run better, I haven't really found any that are useless like Pro states. The fact that they could run better does however not…
- 1219.
Technology is harming the global economy
For
- The "affordability index" that I was referring to is simply stating the fact that wages have not kept up with inflation over the last 30 years. And, the reasons are as I've previously laid out.http://www.washingtontimes.com...Or, as CNN reported in 2006. "Employee pay lowest…
- It seems obvious that my opponent has taken an economics course, possible a couple of them. I say this because his arguments are fairly sound, THEORETICALLY. Kind of like tax cuts for the rich will stimulate the economy, and tax-cuts for business will encourage investments.…
Against
- My opponent does not mention any of the explanation that I have given him in round 3 and instead goes on trying to show the validity of his claims by posting a news article, a link that does not work and a news video. My opponent has been unable to formulate a clear argument…
- I realize that the topic of this debate calls for broader discussion on several fronts, including politics, however, economics is a social science and as such is bound to several rules that do not change no matter what your personal political beliefs are. I will analyze my…
- 1220.
Video game prices should be lowered from $60
For
- "Games are too expensive and the industry would benefit from lower price points" -Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim director Todd Howard. But I do think industry-wide we would benefit from more games out at $19 or $29. I would try more games. Because I'm not going to try a game for $60.…
Against
- That's all, folks.
- Well, this is a shame.
- 1221.
The US federal government should raise the minimum wage
For
- It's ok. Hopefully we can debate in the future on minimum wage.
- Extended
Against
- Forgive me, I shouldn't have created this debate.
- I will assume that we are arguing whether America should raise the minimum wage or not, to make our debate more specific to a situation. The main argument in favor of raising the minimum wage is adding more money to the pockets of those with low wages. However, I will be…
- 1222.
Microsoft resembles Walmart in its business practices
For
- Microsoft has grown to be a monopoly for a long time and it is starting to get pedestrian, pretty much like Walmart, except for is is not cheap.
- In many ways it is, it is the dominant OS on PC's at at work place. It is more bug ridden than the alternatives but still has the largest market share at a higher price. What do you call that? It is lacking creativity and sees whatever makes money out there and try to copy it,…
Against
- My opponent forfeited the last round. As such my rebuttals stand.Enjoy voting.
- Thanks to my opponent.My opponent has stated that Microsoft is the dominant OS in the work place. He has also said that it bug ridden and has the biggest share at high price. However, this debate is about whether Microsoft is a monopoly, not about its security or the fact that…
- 1223.
Technological advancement will significantly harm the job market
For
- A horse walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Why the long face?" The horse says, "A machine stole my job." Of course, the horse didn't suspect that owning a car would become the norm. There wasn't the infrastructure or the money per household to support machines taking…
- This is a debate in the second round of the official May tournament. TUF and I are going to be debating the topic that is written out in the topic portion above. Structure is pretty standard. In TUF's first debating round, he will be allowed to provide rebuttals. Otherwise…
Against
- When it comes to change, people are naturally a little weary. Such has been the case with most major social dynamics concerning the economy and the Job market. Anything that people feel like will result in the loss of jobs, people will automatically become a bit skeptical. The…
- I very much look forward to debating Jonbonbon, and I have no doubt this will be an excellent debate. This should prove to be a spectacular tournament, win or lose, I am glad for the oppertunity to debate you! :)
- 1224.
Tax increases should be prioritized over spending cuts
For
- Now we must look into the many Miss-conceptions of my opponents caseIn his first contention, he talks about about how "Tax's will harm America in the long run", however, this is a total false hood. He stated that "it will cut the deficit by $500 Billion", but if we look to Paul…
- May we have fun, and may it serve a greater purpose in the up coming weeks, as it is the current high school PF resolution. Now let us begin! "Although it is not usually popular with the American public, the concept of raising taxes does offer certain benefits. In some cases,…
Against
- Thank you for your rebuttal, and now I will go on to my own. Let us first look at proposition's side of the argument. First contention: Prioritizing Tax increase benefits the economy in more ways then people think. Sub-point A)More revenue and a balanced budget. Looking back at…
- Resolved: The United States should prioritize tax increases over spending cuts. The opposition side strongly negate this resolution. My contentions for negating this resolution are: prioritization of tax increases will harm us in the long term, we can afford to cut government…
- 1225.
The US penny should be removed from circulation
For
- If we take away the penny (and the nickel), we will be back at 1947. This was shortly after the Great Depression ended, and if we don't have smaller coins (the lack of small coins prevented us from getting out of this terrible event), a whole new Great Depression could appear.…
- Many economic breakdowns have resulted in the collapse of countries. My opponent clearly said we could get over it however may I argue that the Soviet Union, one of the two superpowers in the world at that time, experienced an economic collapse. This crisis was one of the key…
Against
- Let me make this clear. I said an economic breakdown HERE, meaning the U.S. The US is much more capable of recovering from a breakdown than the Soviet Union. Back on topic, my closing argument is that the penny is outdated. The time has come for it to be removed, naturally or…
- The removal of the penny will cause an economic breakdown, sure. But so have many other things- and we got over it. The penny is soon going to be obselete, along with most other coins and even bills. Technology is growing by the minute. Credit cards are a more efficient way of…
- 1226.
Workers should be paid more than managers
For
- but workers should be motivated to work harder by giving them higher wages otherwise they would all leave and the manager will become unemployed.
- Managers are given all the credit even though its the workers doing the real work while managers just sit back being bossy. who do you think deserves more wages?
Against
- "but workers should be motivated to work harder by giving them higher wages otherwise they would all leave and the manager will become unemployed." That not true. People are given lower pay so they can be motivated to work harder so they can reach the top. If workers are paid…
- I think managers should be paid more because they were just normal workers too and worked there way up to that position.
- 1227.
Governments should switch from capitalism to socialism due to technology
For
- Rebuttals and Conclusions only this round please. No new arguments. Before I start my argument, I will give the definition of "contribution" and "quality/quantity of work", which are used interchangeably in my argument. Ex. If Bob bakes 100 tasty bread while Joe bakes 100…
- Thank you for a great argument. *I am sorry for not clearly defining the word "socialism" since I have a right wing view on capitalism. It was supposed to be "wealth redistribution" or any government similar to Norway and Sweden's. However, you can ignore the post and I will…
Against
- Notice how this motion is phrased'Governments should switch from capitalism to socialism due to technological advances'Pro is representing the side changing the status quo. He has to convince you governments should switch from capitalism TO SOCIALISM. You should not vote for…
- First, I will give the definition of Communism Communism: A political and economic ideology based on communal ownership (while private property is abolished) and the absence of class. (http://www.investopedia.com...) 1. In your argument, you have defined socialism as 'a…
- 1228.
Greater capitalism and free markets will harm the economy
For
- reiterate
- con argues we are not truly a capitalistic country. we are a lot more than by far most other developed countries, are we not? and con doesn't explain how it would be *better* if we were more capitalistic. ive established that our country's inequality is one of the worst in the…
Against
- I think your argument begins with:if we let things go as they will, the rich will only get richer. instead of the 1% owning say 30% of everything, it will become more and more of everything,. that will stifle economic stimulus, cause wealth will be immobilized in the hands of…
- 1229.
Governments should redistribute wealth
For
- If I confused individual and corporate tax rates under FDR, then I apologize. However, for purposes of this debate, the difference is quite inconsequential, as the issue at hand is whether, as a moral matter, wealth ought to be redistributed; and whether, furthermore, as a…
- Focusing first on your claim that the redistribution of wealth (or, more generally, resources) would somehow inherently destroy all incentive to work on the part of those from whom resources were taken, this is just patently untrue. It is a well-known historical fact of…
Against
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ R1: Excessive Taxation has Disadvantages "It is a well-known historical fact of economics that, even when corporations are taxed at supposedly exorbitant rates (e. g. ,…
- Vote Contra.
- 1230.
Companies should offer alternative interview methods to candidates
For
- Unsuitable for employable people with Asperger's Syndrome and similar conditions.
- Doesn't always suit the job.
Against
- Misses the point of an interview.
- A significant number of studies reveal that the first impression is in fact the last impression
- 1231.
The minimum wage should be raised
For
- The con side has forfeited the 2nd round so I will keep this short to keep it fair. The point of the minimum wage, as put by FDR, is to make sure someone can have a decent level of living. The current minimum wage is a poverty wage and needs to be raised. I do not want 15…
- I accept the challenge and will debate that we should raise the minimum wage. The resolution or the con speaker did not define or say how far reaching this raise was or how much it will be, so I will debate that this will be a increase on the existing federal minimum wage. I…
Against
- The purpose of the minimum wage is to help those disenfranchised workers who earn far less than what most Americans would consider acceptable. However, raising the minimum wage will only hurt those same marginalized workers. This is because you force those disenfranchised…
- "My opponent claims that if we raise the minimum wage, that it would make such a difference that it would make employers not want to hire any laborers." My argument against the minimum wage is primarily an argument on economic principle, not an actual dollar amount - I am not…
- 1232.
Raising the federal minimum wage would not be economically beneficial
For
- Resolved: Raising the federal minimum wage would not be economically beneficial Shared burden of proof.
Against
- ForfeitUnfortunately Pro has forfeited every round of this debate. This merits a loss of conduct points, but I will leave that at the discretion of the voters. At this point, I will offer my own case which will go unrefuted. Resolved: Raising the Federal Minimum Wage would be…
- This is unfortunate. I was hoping for a debate on this subject. At this point, I will give my opponent a chance to respond and will provide my own case in the next round.
- 1233.
Oil has been more a curse than a blessing for the Middle East
For
- The oil in the middle east has caused them to be engaged in many wars over the scarce resource e.g Iran and Iraq
Against
- I will give my opponent the beginning of the next round to make a case, otherwise I will proceed with my argument.
- I accept your challenge. I contend that most strife in the Middle East is caused by issues other than oil. Ancient and modern rivalries revolving around tribe and religion are the main driving force of Middle East conflicts.
- 1234.
Bitcoin is a scam
For
- Yeah, that"s right you better forfeit, you are yet to provide a real argument, if you are willing to do so make a new debate about this and cite it o your net argument, unless you forfeit again.
- So? Anyone ca use speed, there is no official company named "speed", and speed is not issued by any central authority, anyone can make and sell it! You just ned ingredients
Against
- I really can't see why you would really care about whether Bitcoin is a scam or not. Bitcoin is an open source because anyone can use it. It is open to the general public and nobody "owns it." This really isn't something worth debating over.
- Bitcoin is not a scam because: 1. Scams require hidden aspects. Bitcoin is a 100% pure and open source. 2. The only people calling this a scam are the ones who don't know anything about it. Is it risky to invest your money into? Yes. Does that make it a scam? No. 3. With…
- 1235.
Americans are blind to garment working conditions as long as clothes are cheap
For
- Agreed. Consumers are all hypocrites. We pretend to care about human rights when it's convenient but not when it matters. I suggest you watch Jon Oliver's Last Week Tonight segment (free on youtube). A lot of research goes into each segment along with tongue and cheek comedy,…
- Only 2% of clothes manufactured are made in America because the USA has the most burdensome and expensive labor costs in the world. Several USA brands have their manufacturing hubs in Asia and various other non-regulated regions allowing for 'cheap' labor costs and therefore…
Against
- I would like to make a few comments on the above statement. 1st of all, America is a continent, not a country. Second of all, Jon Oliver is a comedian, I doubt he has a lot of knowledge of economics, sociology or any related topics. Also note that his 'review' is comedy based.…
- As Con has proven and Pro has agreed, 'Americans' do not care about working conditions for the workers of any industry, whether the products are expensive or cheap. I would like to thank Pro for the opportunity to debate, and hope we can debate again, in a better setting next…
- 1236.
Taxes on the top 1 percent of income earners should be raised
For
- Extending once again. Unfortunately CON failed to provide any arguments and is not permitted to offer any now because I won't be able to respond.
- I am quite disappointed that Con has forfeited. Per the agreed-upon rules, a forfeit merits a loss. However, I will leave that at the discretion of the voters, and would invite my opponent to present his arguments in the next round. At this point, I obviously have nothing to…
Against
- I accept and will be negating the claim that taxes on the top 1 percent of income earners should be increased.
- 1237.
Vast economic inequality harms the US economy
For
- "The incredible fact" is calculated by the sources mentioned underneath. Source: U.S. Census Bureau; Minnesota Population Center/IPUMS Explanation and analysis: http://www.nytimes.com... For the sake of fairness (and partly due to my exam tomorrow of which I must bone up), let…
- Thanks for challenging this notion and for participating in this debate, 16kadams. (1) Income inequality may or may not be increasing. As inequality has increased, the wealth of the poor has also increased. Between 2000 - 2010, inequality has actually decreased. Let us be clear…
Against
- I will reiterate my last round summary: (1) Inequality may or may not be increasing(1a) Measurments of inequality are flawed(1b) Measurments exagerate income inequaliy(2) Economic disparity can be good under certian situations(2a) The 'good' economic disparity is what exists in…
- R1) Inequality growth Technically, if you look at long term rates, the rate is unchanged. It increased throughout the 70s, fell, and then has increased to levels to those at about the 1920s [1. http://www.jstor.org...]. And, again, this begs the question as to whether or not…
- 1238.
Unions should be easier to form through card check
For
- Currently serious debaters avoid online debating, and for good reason. Plagiarism such as http://www.debate.org... , plagiarized from http://www.fiu.edu... and http://www.debate.org... , plagiarized from http://www.finitesite.com... is not being addressed. Multiple accounts:…
- UAW. http://www.npr.org... Yes that's a pretty good job. Health care for life even after you retire. Here's an even better one. Must be a better union: http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com... It's worth a thousand of those UAW jobs. I would much prefer that union where you get your…
Against
- Alright then opponent. I post my arguments with these 3 contentions: 1) Card check system is flawed 2) Binding arbitration is flawed 3) This bill will ultimately hurt American business 1) Card Checking Now lets talk about card checking. Under EFCA as long as unions have…
- I negate the following resolved. Although my opponent may post their arguments next round, i ask that they dont so we can have an even debate.
- 1239.
Capitalism is more humanitarian than communism
For
- It's unfortunate that's he's limited the scope of our discussion by waiting until so late to bring them up, but better late than never. He's also touched on corporate power and monopolies again, but it's merely a rehash of his previous points and my earlier criticisms remain…
- == Analysis == I think it's become clear at this point that my opponent is not interested in rationally discussing ideas; he is a secular evangelist substituting Karl Marx for Jesus and trying to use this debate as a platform for his proselytizing efforts. Although Con spent…
Against
- In this round I'll deal with some of pro's basic arguments. Firstly, if for argument's sake I agree that property ownership is necessary for "self-ownership" or personal autonomy, well then, under communism everyone would produce and own everything interdependently, and, if…
- Firstly, The debate is about the humanitarianism of capitalism vs. that of communism, therefore the true nature of capitalism is highly relevant and critiquing it is not at all a waste of space. As for "contractarianism", the "social contract" that libertarians, et al dream of…
- 1240.
Capitalism encourages personal freedom
For
- That's a wrap.
- Moving things to their conclusion
Against
- Concludin'...
- That's perfectly fine, and I hope your work week is productive.
- 1241.
Corporate tax cuts would boost job growth
For
- So you'really suggesting to raisee taxes on the people and have 0% for corporations? What if companies don't pay people more? What's their incentive to do so? What if they just keep the profits?
- So I took a decent amount of time to try and create a plan to incentivise companies to hire more people. I call it golden key economics. Please tell me if this would work, or if not, how could it be improved? National corporate tax rate: 30% Tax rate decreased by 1% for every…
Against
- Corporations don't just keep the money, it has to go somewhere, and is paid to their shareholders, we can just tax them. That way the corporation will have an incentive to reinvest this money rather than paying it to shareholders as to raise the price of its stocks.
- Here's a better idea: Corporate tax rate: 0%, that way buisnesses will have more money to invest in creating more jobs. Instead tax those who receive checks from that corporation, derived from those profits.
- 1242.
Minimum wage laws harm the economy
For
- 1) You're completely nonresponsive to my argument that minimum wage laws to not actually provide a check on discriminatory wages. Just because women must make at least the minimum wage does not guarantee that they will be making the same as men. If you're looking for the…
- 1) I agree with your point that there should be a check on discrimination between the pay of men and women, but minimum wage laws are not the way to go about it. Not only do the harms of economy decline outweigh any possible benefits, but minimum wage laws don't even solve this…
Against
- Firstly I would like to congratulate you lol. That is the strongest argument you've had. Now to assess your arguments… 1) What I was trying to imply with vague wording on the connection between minimum wage laws and discrimination is actually fairly simple. Discrimination will…
- 1) As a woman and not yet an adult I would at least like to have the comfort of a minimum wage. This comfort allows me to have the knowledge that I will get at least as much as an adult male with the same work experience as I. Without the minimum wage the 1920's will be…
- 1243.
American companies should pay offshore workers US wages
For
- We have the power to help those countries rise up. We don't have to jump to 15.00 an hour warehouse jobs for china and mexico. But we could raise the payment which would make us even more competitive for laborers in other countries. Regardless of if said country excepts it or…
- Of course right now they are allowed to pay anything they'd like but we are significantly more powerful than Mexico and many larger companies could afford to pay more. Yes American wages, as in the range of wages. If they pay more in mex ico, it could prompt mexican companies…
Against
- You obviously have no idea of what you're discussing.Who cares about peoples' emotions?How could companies exist if they didn't pay fair wages to their workers?How could you try to force employers to pay their employees supposedly fair wages?If you did try, what would…
- In the United States, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, which translates to approximately $1160 per month (assuming 40 hour days on all weekdays). In addition to the wages offered to employees, businesses are mandated to contribute money to workers' Social Security and…
- 1244.
Entirely unregulated capitalism does not work
For
- communism:"a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs."Since the economic reform of china in 1978, it has not been even…
- The 2008 study ends up being irrelevant. This is because for businesses to do well, they want to minimize costs and maximize profits. So when businesses themselves do well it doesn't mean it is good for the market or people working there. We don't want the businesses to do too…
Against
- First, while it's true that China has made a shift towards capitalism in recent years, there are still high levels of government regulation with the state being held in higher regard than enterprise. China's economic philosophy is in no way comparable to the philosophy of the…
- Yes, businesses will maximize cost, but not at the expense of the people who work there, because if the people who work there are injured, seeking other employment, or unionizing, the business will begin to lose money. in the modern era it is unprofitable to antagonize or…
- 1245.
Governments should adopt family-friendly employment policies
For
- It does not disrupt business. Many business's are well-aware ahead of time when their employee is expected to give birth. Many employees request the time off as soon as they have a confirmed due date from their doctors. [1] Also, baby bumps can start to show as soon as 12 weeks…
- I extend, once more, the opportunity for my opponent to present their argument as instigator of this debate. Should my opponent forfeit the last round, I will present my case in order to fulfill my duty of upholding my position with an argument. I now return the floor to my…
Against
- The motion to be debated is" So called family friendly policies, such as maternity leave, paternity leave and parental leave should be severely restricted, or even abolished. In practice they disrupt business , increase the cost of production and put the UK at a competitive…
- 1246.
The United States should adopt a national sales tax
For
- I already mentioned how the states would make money. The poor would get richer if they didn't have an income tax on them in the first place. And no, businesses would not have to face financial hardships, if this were the only tax in place. We need to take steps in implementing…
- First of all, if we eliminated every other tax, and implemented this at a rate of 17% TOTAL (Don't worry, the states' cash cow would be toll roads based on converted carpool or left shoulder lanes on highways and interstates), the economy would shoot up LIKE A ROCKET. People…
Against
- - I already mentioned how the states would make money. The poor would get richer if they didn't have an income tax on them in the first place. + THE POOR ($5000 -) DONT PAY INCOME TAXES!!! - And no, businesses would not have to face financial hardships, if this were the only…
- Opponent- First of all, if we eliminated every other tax, and implemented this at a rate of 17% TOTAL (Don't worry, the states' cash cow would be toll roads based on converted carpool or left shoulder lanes on highways and interstates), the economy would shoot up LIKE A ROCKET.…
- 1247.
The gender wage gap is a serious problem
For
- Okay! the gender pay gap (also known as gender wage gap, male"female income difference, gender gap in earnings, gender earnings gap, gender income difference) is the difference between male and female earnings expressed as a percentage of male earnings, according to the OECD.…
- I do believe gender wage gap is an issue of concern.
Against
- Definitions: "Gender wage gap": a difference in the pay between men and women "Concern": a societal or economic issue serious enough to warrant government action These terms may be negotiated. Statistics are expected, and poor use of statistics should result in less votes.
- Anyone want a rematch?
- 1248.
Existing highways should not be privatized
For
- I wonder where he's been for so long, by the way. Many of you will remember Badger's early days on this site when his avatar was a charming photo of him on the lash down the pub, grinning menacingly and swinging a pool cue about in an aggressive manner. Oh, yes, the good old…
- You know what it"s like: you are cruising along in your trusty Rolls-Royce when your chauffeur announces that there is a traffic jam ahead and, as a consequence, your arrival at the Cafe de Posh for your luncheon appointment with your tax accountant is likely to be somewhat…
Against
- Lol, that was hilarious. I love remembering stuff that other people remember, too. Anyway, I concede.
- I would have you all now, for your own enjoyment of course, take a moment to appreciate the so well rounded, bespectacled cranium, adorned with a mandible that would've done Samson tenfold as many murders as that donkey's did, to be seen in his avatar. And if you lose yourself…
- 1249.
Welfare should be replaced with a negative income tax
For
- Compromise "The compromise Valladarex calls for is not really a compromise between our two positions…I'd still be holding my nose, because the income tax system is VERY malleable to political pressure" I did not mean to call for a compromise between our positions, but for a…
- Conflict of interest: Government as Charitable Organization "The biggest problem with government doing the job of long-term charity to its citizens, especially in a system with elected officials, is that it becomes a conflict of interest. Our representatives seek to get…
Against
- Thanks for putting forward the NIT in debate, Valladarex. It's an interesting idea I've not heard of before.There seems to be a few very important misunderstandings about my position.I am not anti-taxation. I have said that it is reasonable to pay taxes so the government can…
- FeasabilityThe compromise Valladrex calls for is not really a compromise between our two positions, but rather a compromise between supporters of the current bloated system and my position of eliminating the system. If the compromise is between Valladrex's and my position, it…
- 1250.
Housewives should be paid for their work
For
- Paying housewives for their work is an important form of economic empowerment.
- Housewives are entitled to pay
Against
- Paying housewives reduces social mobility
- Paying housewives is financially impractical.
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?