Economy Debate Topics for Students — page 3
1,282 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 101.
Poverty can and should be eradicated
For
- I believe we can {and afford} to ensure the income of every adult is over the poverty line {be it through welfare payments or something else}. I believe we can also ensure that everyone has access to adequate amounts of what is commonly viewed as the necessities of life. Food,…
- Hello, I respectfully disagree that I focused on reducing it instead of eradication. I made the specific point that the fact we have reduced it puts us in a better position to be able to eradicate the remaining poverty. There is a relatively small number left to help (in some…
Against
- - Thanks Pro for instigating the debate, & I accept his challenge. Resolution: - Poverty: the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions [1]. - Eradicate: to do away with as completely as if by pulling up by the roots [2]. BOP:…
- Rebuttals:the fact we have reduced it puts us in a better position to be able to eradicate the remaining poverty. There is a relatively small number left to help (in some countries) making it more manageable- Pro's proposition here is invalid, for:1. It's a straw man fallacy!…
- 102.
Europe should create a European Monetary Fund
For
- European Monetary Fund creates global AND regional system
- The EMF could enhance transparency of public finances
Against
- EMF would not be big enough to save entire EU countries
- Investing EMF assets abroad could cause consternation
- 103.
Economic development of developing countries matters more than environmental protection
For
- haha nice darryn. Check out that comment! loving it lol. I have your xbox 360 hard drive so u betta be nice to me. Therefore it is actually me who has won, THUS, I>U.
- Go for It Darryn! I will let you present your case first.
Against
- fcuk why do u have my drive ?? lol bring it 2mrw
- You like boys. Therefore I win . You= Fail. Me > you
- 104.
Tax rates should be raised on the wealthy
For
- Thanks for the debate! so in a nutshell, while I'm a fan of the capitalist system and market economics, government intervention is required occasionally to correct market failure- that is, where the market outcome is not the socially optimal one. Taxation is a case in point:…
- Hi all, just signed up! apologies in advance for the mistakes in form I'm bound to make. Definitions: The Rich: top 10% income bracket and above Tax rates: marginal effective tax, which includes capital gains, etc rates http://en.wikipedia.org... The argument: I intend to argue…
Against
- I kind of understand. Poor people are getting poorer and rich people are getting richer. It is not good for society if poor people get poorer so we should take more money from rich people on the sole basis that they make more money. Why is it up to the rich to support the poor?…
- I await my opponent's opening arguments. Good luck!
- 105.
Trickle-down economics is a failed system
For
- R1: Income tax reductions increase economic growth, Income tax increases reduce economic growthCon claims that income tax reductions increase economic growth, while income tax increases reduce economic growth. This is true -- but this is not what trickle-down does. Trickle-down…
- I will be arguing in this debate that trickle down economics (also known as supply-side or reaganomics) is a failed economic system and only results in the stagnation of wages for the working class, an intense growth in income inequality, and severe economic recessions among…
Against
- I win.
- Rubio 2016
- 106.
Governments should adopt laissez-faire economic policies
For
- hey azjar, don't worry about being late or whatever. i'm just glad you aren't like the other people that accept a debate then never present an argument. so thanks for responding. -welfare first of all let me remind the readers of this debate that welfare is the extortion of…
- ok i'm not exactly sure what to say if someone doesn't respond to my opening argument so as soon as you bring up any opposition to what i said in round 1, i will counter it.
Against
- As for welfare, I do not agree with the current system either. But you must admit that welfare indeed helped save many people from total destitution during and after the Great Depression. Is the system now to my liking? No. But reforms are needed, not a "system" of charity that…
- Hello mv, sorry about the long wait. Been a bit too busy to really put my heart into the debate for the past week but now I've got time to put into it. For starters, I'm going to disagree that laissez faire SHOULD exist. It clearly does not in my opinion either, but I only need…
- 107.
New technologies will make Africa's youth entrepreneurs
For
- Technology will lead job growth for youths.
- Changing education systems and democracy.
Against
- Technology remains insecure and a security risk.
- The technological revolution has been hyped.
- 108.
Institute a mandatory retirement age
For
- Dismantling gerontocracies
- Maintaining access to pension and healthcare plans
Against
- Maintain the diversity of the labour market
- Professional roles and professional knowledge
- 109.
Essential services should be socialized and private services regulated
For
- I will begin by offering 3 main premises for my argument. 1. Most essential services that all human beings are entitled to as members of society should be socialized. Socialized, meaning owned and operated by the community as a whole, whether that means through the Government,…
- I will offer rebuttals and a closing statement. My opponent claims that nations with universal healthcare are not nearly as wealthy as the United States, and that the 2nd most richest nation on Earth (People's Republic of China) has only half the GDP of the US. For starters,…
Against
- The assertion that the PRC had 1/2 the nominal GDP is correct. Pro wishes to use a different measuring scale which is perfectly acceptable but the fact still remains that this is the next wealthiest nation and provides a scale of where other nations with universal healthcare…
- Contrary to pro's assertion, nations with universal healthcare are not nearly as wealthy as the US whose free market system has made it possible. The 2nd wealthiest nation is the PRC whose GDP is only half of the US. Also, average amounts/person are inaccurate because they…
- 110.
The federal government should raise the minimum wage
For
- Ignore the double forfeit round Once again, I apologize for forfeiting last round but DDO was down to fix the forfeit glitch so there was nothing I could do. My opponent, on the other hand, has not left his speech anywhere. So let me just go over the main reasons I'm winning…
- I affirm and value morality. This implies util as the value criterion, i. e. having the best results possible is the most moral action. Sinnot Armstrong (. http://sites.duke.edu...): Of course, there are many other versions of deontology. (. .. ) deontological theories unable…
Against
- Your personal opinion has nothing to do with this debate " Resolved: The US government ought to raise the minimum wage." Deals with what the politicians want to raise the minimum wage to not what you want it as. The government will not raise it to $10 they will raise it above…
- I stand by my view that the US government should not meddle in the payroll of businesses. In history the only thing government has shown it is good at is destroying perfectly good systems. Contention 1 is expansion of economy (http://www.forbes.com...) Let us take for a moment…
- 111.
Fiscal conservatism and private enterprise are the best path out of recession
For
- There isn't a single economic model anywhere that shows that government "investing" yields long term economic growth. Fairness is not an American value. Reducing taxes and cutting government spending will increase the overall wealth of America which is not finite, but in only…
- Ok, I wrote that so I will rewrite it here: The first step to fix this country is to immediately slash federal government spending. Although this will send a shock through the entire economic system, it is a necessary shock. When the system is artificially propped up, there…
Against
- Suprised about how much I've changed my views since I started this debate. Regardless of that,Vote Contra
- My arguments are extended.
- 112.
Not all property is capital
For
- The question of what is and what is not capital is one very much so pertinent to American society, especially considering our country's conformity to capitalist principles. This system of buying and selling is an integral part of our society without which we would be unable to…
- Interesting topic. I'm looking forward to seeing where this debate leads. Thanks to my opponent for instigation, and I wholeheartedly look forward to this round.
Against
- = Framework = Burden of proof Contrary to what my opponent has claimed, I do not hold the burden of proof. The resolution is "not all property is capital", meaning pro is making the claim. Criteria for capital As stated before, capital is anything that can be considered a form…
- According to the IRS "Almost everything you own and use for personal purposes, pleasure or investment is a capital asset", and "Capital assets include a home, household furnishings and stocks and bonds held in a personal account." (1) Land is capital, a house is capital, a car…
- 113.
A legal limit on weekly work hours should be enforced
For
- Point recognized, but, if you don't have stress from all the work, you will be less pressured to work under the table. As you said, the government won't be furious because they can just place larger fines on working under the table. Think about it, would you rather stay safe…
- I agree that there should be a legally mandated ceiling on weekly working hours. Having a cap on weekly working hours could potentially reduce stress, create more family time, add more jobs, eliminate a few abusive cases and less chances of error. If a single person is working…
Against
- Less stress will not solve the problem at hand. People may be more stressed because they are working illegally and just Because you are less stressed has nothing to do with working under the table. If you are working under the table it is because you need the money.
- Although you may have less stress and more family time, there will be a new problem at hand. Peple will start illegally working to get the income they require. The goverment will be furious and they can't put a law in place to stop them because there is already a law that says…
- 114.
All countries should adopt a single global currency
For
- Great constructive Subutai! I stand affirmed, that 'All countries should use the same currency'. Unlike my opponent I will not focus on any specific established currency. The resolution does nothing to indicate the adoption of an already established currency, so under the…
- Sorry for the wait Subutai, and thanks for issuing this challenge! I've got to say I really appreciate the round structure you're laid out for this debate to operate under, and I look forward to the forthcoming clash.
Against
- I know my opponent has a busy schedle since he is currently at a debate tournament himself. I respect his inability to post and ask the many readers of this debate to stay tuned to a round 2 of this debate. At the consent of DoctorDeku, I will get this debate deleted and we…
- Thanks DoctorDeku. He mentioned that he will not be focusing on a specific currency. I'd just like to reiterate that my arguments are not bound to the Euro. It is just an example because it is the only modern example we have of a universal currency. I. A Universal Currency…
- 115.
A flat tax system is worse than progressive taxation
For
- Well that's good then.
- I don't believe people living in an apartment should be taxed more than people living in a house. Convince me otherwise.
Against
- Indeed. The flat tax is not bad, since it taxes people proportionately.
- Never fear. If the people living in the apartment are earning, for example, $30,000 per year and the people living in the house are earning $50,000 per year, then a flat tax (10% for example) would only take $3,000 of the apartment people and $5,000 of the house people. The…
- 116.
The food industry misleads consumers
For
- The food industry more often than not advertises food as natural and healthy. Instead they cruelly stuff animals in small cages and feed them formula. The animals tend to die of disease and over-growth in such houses. Pigs are by far one of the worse treated animals, they are…
- In the food industry, GMO(genetically modified organism) is the norm. There are GMO chickens and corn, cows and pigs, but what you don't know is that these GMO operations can lead to gruesome outcomes. The chicken is overgrown to a bone crushing point, it is kept hidden in…
Against
- I accept. BoP is on you.
- 117.
Government should pick winners and losers in the economy
For
- I would like to argue that governments should pick winners and losers. The very fact that there is a government is what picks winners and losers. Government by definition picks winners and losers. Governments pick who gets what business grants and who doesn't. Who gets taxed…
- "Everyone has to pay tax so I'm not sure what you mean." When the government decides to tax who and at what rate its picking winners and losers. Who will win at keeping the most of their money and who will lose at keeping most of their money. "The real role of a government is…
Against
- Everyone has to pay tax so I'm not sure what you mean. If the government declares war, that means that nobody wins, because by your statement, it means that both parties get to choose who wins or lose, so both parties could be winners. The real role of a government is supposed…
- I accept.
- 118.
The federal minimum wage should be raised to $15 an hour
For
- You are a flip flopper, but even those win a lot. You are devious.
Against
- Win!
- Win!
- 119.
Governments should abolish welfare programs
For
- This round calls for conclusions. I have shared the voters with reasons why Welfare should be abolished, and how we should replace it. Con fails to negate my argument. For the most Part, Con agrees with most of the points I was making. Con fails to prove to us that the system…
- I'm really unsure where to begin in this round because Con stated his argument in R1. So I will begin by refuting his argument now, then by defending my argument. Con states "Getting Rid of welfare would help very few, but it would harm many. Who would you be trying to help by…
Against
- Con fails to prove to us that the system doesn't get taken advantage of. Instead, he agreed that it does get taken advantage of and that "The poor steal from the rich". Con simply agrees that the system gets taken advantage of.You take my quotes out of context, in this…
- some good points, I have really enjoyed this back and forth.Pro says:It's not new news that machines build most things that we make. They put together toys, cars etc. We don't need employees for this since machines already do this for us. A person should go to college to get a…
- 120.
NAFTA has benefited all parties involved
For
- NAFTA has improved democracy in Mexico.
- The US has benefitted from NAFTA through lower prices and increased trade
Against
- NAFTA has interfered with Canadian laws concerning environmental protection.
- NAFTA has reduced workers' bargaining power.
- 121.
Government spending on festivals is wasteful
For
- If I don"t have enough money, I would earn more money correct? One way of doing that is spending the money you have to earn even more. Sure spending money on fixing roads is a good idea. What if you don"t have enough though? Let"s say a road costs $10,000 to fix, but you only…
- "One example if middle class family are having shortage of money what will they first prefer to do with that little money will they invest in birthday marriage or will they invest on food health education." Birthdays and marriage do not bring in money. Festivals on the other…
Against
- By organising festival can we earn money I don't think so let me ask you some questions? If you saw some place where the road are in very bad and dangerous for travellers to travel if you saw that road is very important for some people and it could be damaged very soon what…
- Thanks for accepting my debate One example if middle class family are having shortage of money what will they first prefer to do with that little money will they invest in birthday marriage or will they invest on food health education. Govt officer minister they just think of…
- 122.
Welfare should be completely transformed
For
- Welfare should not be a lifestyle. It should be a way to support you or your family for a TEMPORARY period of time until you can find a job. The way welfare is today, people are able to survive off of it without getting a job. They may not be living a lavish lifestyle, but…
- So they're richer than 20% of people in the world. Does that mean everyone else is dead? They are definitely struggling but they are clearly living. And to your point on it's not a living wage, I don't think you read that second article. A druggy woman (on welfare), a druggy…
Against
- Well, um, since Pro forfeited that round, I'd just like to take this opportunity to say that welfare works mostly as it should, poor people are not all thieves, and VOTE FOR ME. Thank you.
- There are people who will abuse any system, but my point is that anecdotes do not prove anything. I agree that those people were losers; but nothing in the article talks about them receiving welfare, or, if they did, spending it on drugs. Who knows how they were surviving, but…
- 123.
Free trade benefits the United States
For
- Why?
- people shouldn't forfeit
Against
- That's not how I see trade at all. Considering that you're for free trade and for a system that we've had in place before do you not see the flaws of it? Do you not see the billions of dollars we pwe to China? Do you not sed their devaluation of their currency? As a supreme…
- I accept the argument. I will be arguing that free trade while in SOME cases in beneficial, in most it's not. Have a great debate.
- 124.
College tuition is too expensive
For
- The cost of college is becoming a big problem in the U.S. But that is not the fault of the universities. If the economy and other main factors where not in such a hole, there would be no reason to raise tuition. However, there are many options for students out there to find…
- Your statement saying that everyone should receive an equal opportunity to a adequate education is very true. However I believe the government and states are doing there best for what they got. Loans and other programs to get student to high end schools would just the nation in…
Against
- Tamar Lewin published an article "Burdens of College Loans on Graduates Grows" in the New York Times. It reflects on some of the statistics based from 2008 students taking out loans to pay for their education. The facts show that people that have to pay more money for school…
- The cost of college is becoming an issue all across America. With the current state of the economy, the percent of unemployed workers and the cost of college can seem like a far fetched goal. Many people who may not receive a scholarship or enough government funding may not be…
- 125.
Employers should be banned from using credit scores in hiring
For
- The information that is used to create a credit score is derived from five main areas: types of credit in use (10%), new credit (10%), Length of credit history (15%), amounts owed (30%), and payment history (35%). Credit agencies do not use factors such as gender, race,…
- Con said, "Just because not every…minority is responsible for the statistical situation of their group does not mean that they are not responsible for their own credit score, indeed, it is for precisely the same reasons that absolve them from responsibility for their group,…
Against
- " Credit scoring used in hiring practices creates what is called an adverse affect, and it's against the law." Whether something actually is against the law has no bearing on whether it "Should be" prohibited, i.e. against the law. " "It shall be an unlawful employment practice…
- " First off, the resolution is intended for government intervention under EEOC laws to include credit scoring for non-bone fide reasons. This negates anything related to military or security sensitive jobs, and that is a bone fide reason for discriminating against someone under…
- 126.
A person's wealth should not be taken by government upon death
For
- I hate throwing around trite phrases like straw man in a debate; however, my opponent is clearly twisting my words around in an attempt to make himself look better. For example, he first exclaims that I am indicating a dead person has more rights (regarding dispersement of…
- My opponent's assumption that I presume all taxation to be bad is false. For one, I am a democrat. Two, I noted in my argument that I clearly supported paying taxes (I suggested a deceased individual should be required to pay income taxes the following 4/15 after their death).…
Against
- "I hate throwing around trite phrases like straw man in a debate; however, my opponent is clearly twisting my words around in an attempt to make himself look better. For example, he first exclaims that I am indicating a dead person has more rights (regarding dispersement of…
- "However Con was noting that my wording was illogical -- I disagree -- but I do feel the need to clarify. When I stated, "I believe that an individual has the right to do as they please with their own money" I was referring to after their death. I continued to say, "I can…
- 127.
The United States should increase taxes
For
- jjjjj
- con doesn't say what he would cut to make the deficit gone or pay the debt. he just says it's possible. okay, but at what expense? cutting social security and medicare? con says it wouldn't be a problem if the government was small enough. does that include social security and…
Against
- The government hardly even thinks about the national debt. When Isis first emerged in the Iraq region we gave them 25 million dollars no questions asked. It's irresponsible things like that that make the government irresponsible when it comes to managing the budget. We wouldn't…
- The government needs to get their crap together when it comes to managing a budget, and raising taxes should be the last option.
- 128.
Reaganomics caused significant modern economic problems
For
- I accept my opponents concession.
- "And then, in 2008 when the Recession hit, the Democrats were in charge again. "The democrats were freshly elected yes, but whose policies were in effect? Tax cuts for the rich from G. W. Bush. In fact, the recession actually struck before the dems were actually in office. This…
Against
- I have very little actual understanding of economics, yet I challenged you to this debate. It was foolish of me, and I don't know why the heck I did it. I clearly cannot defeat Pro in this debate. Therefore I concede defeat to my opponent.
- You used a lot of fancy charts that I didn't understand, so I'll simply base my debate off what you said. Before I begin, I find it amusing that Democrats always name Reaganomics after Ronald Reagan, but they refuse to name "Obamacare" after Barack Obama. Anyhow, this has…
- 129.
Unchecked growth of the national debt will bankrupt the nation
For
- My opponent asks " how long does this deficit have to go on before it actually starts to hit the economy. " He then goes on to quote sources that say it already has impacted the economy where he cites " A study by the World Bank found that if the debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 77…
- In round 2 I will; Define terms Terms Federal revenue is the total federal income. Federal outlay is the total dollars spent in a year. It is defined as the total mandatory spending plus the total discretionary spending plus debt service. Deficit is the amount of money borrowed…
Against
- Okay, so you think the When the part is irrelevant. But in fact, you are wrong on saying this. Why? Because the When part is very important on this subject. It like you are saying, the nation will go broke soon in a year to 5 years. But in fact, you don't have proof of When or…
- Okay round 2 you decided to go by key terms. Which is fine it just not what i really wanted to hear. Why because when your title says "The growth of the national debt, if not stopped, will bankrupt the nation". I want to know why, when and how it going to bankrupt up the…
- 130.
The Federal Reserve caused the Great Depression
For
- Please read the "To My Opponent" section of my argument before you read my argument and start on your rebuttals. Yes. The Burden of proof does rely on me. I must prove that the Federal Reserve did not cause the Great Depression. I. Bank Failures I.i Investments "Still, the…
- I agree with my opponent for dropping the presupposed stances, and from now on, there will be no required stances. I. How Did the Federal Reserve Cause the Great Depression In 1913, the Democrats wanted a more centralized banking system, and they did just that with the Federal…
Against
- The burden of proof in the round is to prove that the Federal Reserve is the cause of the Great Depression. If I can prove it wasn't the cause, or it had another cause, the burden of proof cannot be upheld and the round is negated. Thus, my constructive speech will be focused…
- I agree to all terms listed above, with the exception of the lowered restrictions which my opponent agreed to. The floor is yours :)
- 131.
Capitalism should be regulated by a government authority
For
- 1) Capitalism obeys the definition of a game: "a form of play or sport, esp a COMPETITIVE one played according to rules and decided by skill, strength, or luck." Even the "play or sport" section of the definition is attributable; the institutions based on gambling are so…
- Let's see if Ragnar is up on his game. 1,000 char maximum, 1st round for intros.
Against
- Accepted. In the spirit of vague terms:"Intro."
- Capitalism is defined by not having "Active" rules to encourage anything in economics. It simply forbids the initiation of force. Competition may result, but only for the same reasons you identify it as existing under socialism or communism. If by capitalism you don't mean…
- 132.
The US should adopt a national 10% retail flat tax
For
- I ran out of time on my last argument but I will just give my argument It is true that a 10% would be a lot less than what the federal government usually get, but this could finally lead to cuts the government and the budget saving money. With this flat tax it would be a lot…
- The debate is about if the United States should change their tax system to a national retail flat tax of 10% on all retail items. I will be the pro side while con will defend the tax system already in place.
Against
- I had a feeling your argument would have gone the route it did, but the resolution is on the tax itself, not the state/cost of the federal budget. The fact is, in 2010, a 10% tax would barely cover Social Security payments ($701 billion), so how could the government afford any…
- Since it looks like a default victory, I will merely state that a 10% flat tax would have only raised around $820 billion (very likely less) in 2010, which represented 23.7% of 2010 federal spending [1]. The current system generated over 2.5x more, at about 62.6% of 2010…
- 133.
Sweatshop production of goods is acceptable
For
- In the United States of America $5.85 is the National Minimum wage. Tipped wages can legally be as low as $2.13 an hour[1]. In Costa Rica the wages for working in a sweatshop is equivalent to $2.38 an hour[2]. Now taking that into consideration, Costa Rica's national GDP per…
- In a country on the brink of a huge economic downfall (USA), we are in a great need for affordable goods. The products that we rely on everyday are coming from countries that are terribly poor. Employment rates in these countries and quality of most working conditions are low.…
Against
- Since Daysuit forfeited I don't have anything new to say, but I stand by the fact that sweatshops are still immoral. Paying workers is different from paying them well, or in many cases even fairly. People working in sweatshops live in conditions that would be unacceptable to…
- "Tipped wages can legally be as low as $2.13 an hour[1]. In Costa Rica the wages for working in a sweatshop is equivalent to $2.38 an hour[2]." Tipped is the key word there. Waiters in a restaurant can make around 50 dollars or over in the course of a day. And being a waiter…
- 134.
The minimum wage should be abolished
For
- Rebuttals:Increases the standard of living for the poorest and most vulnerable class in society:"Clearly, the min. wage would vastly improve the situation for these parents, in turn dealing with the poverty to some extent. This is the fundamental reason to employ a min. wage:…
- Hello, Chelsea. I saw your argument for minimum wage. I would like to debate this issue with you. As a supporter for the abolition of minimum wage, I think we could have a good conversation on the topic. I will give you the first word this round, if you choose to accept.
Against
- My original arguments are paraphrased in italics to give context Your video + Unemployment (as you tied them together): Your video makes the "key observation" that minimum wage increase is a problem. However, a minimum wage increase is NOT part of the resolution. You see,…
- I thank Valladarex for the opportunity to debate a highly contentious topic. While it unusual to go first in a debate where I technically don't have the burden of proof, I will have a chance to refute Pro's argument in the next round. I will provide some arguments as to why…
- 135.
The United States does not need the Federal Reserve
For
- You haven't established anything- but let's assume it were true, Mike Maloney is a very experienced economist who predicted the 2008 crisis 1 month befre it happened, and he said we don't need a Federal Reserve. You see where ths can go? Throughout this debate you have provided…
- Andrew Jackson did not destroy the economy, the bankers contracted the money supply after he ended their privately owned central bank. It's like Brexit, the Brittish people demanded their nation back, so the banksters withdrew all their investments and created a very short…
Against
- I am sorry, but I cannot agree with anything you say. Also, YOU have the burden of proof, which you failed to prove anything and had no arguments, except "one person said so." Here is a quote of the role the federal reserve has: "The Federal Reserve System is the central bank…
- Let me go over my credentials in this topic: I used to be the CEO of Stock Predictions, an online financial consulting firm. I also was their lead economist. I could predict the market better than anyone else at the company, thusly leading to my big promotion. I passed the ACTs…
- 136.
The federal government should raise the minimum wage to $15
For
- Alright! Rebuttal time! I see you have some contentions which I will address in turn. First you claim minimum wages cannot be fairly proportioned to accommodate the city dwellers and the smaller townspeople. Actually that is not true. Fuel, groceries restaurants and rent, taxes…
- Thanks for accepting. There are many reasons that the minimum wage should be raised to 15 dollars. 1. Raising the minimum wage will benefit the economy. http://www.cnbc.com... By raising the minimum wage to $15 dollars an hour the economy will raise with it. "The U.S. economy…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited... extend arguments. :)
- Rebuttals:I'll provide some rebuttals for my opponent's initial speech, per the rules. I'll respond to his attacks on my case in the following round. 1. Benefit EconomyI have a few responses here.> Economic impact is quite demonstrable in its effects, and they are quite…
- 137.
China faces serious economic problems
For
- Bleh. Vote Con. I'll quote some Minxin Pei here."With the United States apparently in terminal decline as the world's sole superpower, the fashionable question to ask is which country will be the new superpower? The near-unanimous answer, it seems, is China. Poised to overtake…
- My opponent has cancelled his account on DDO, unfortunately, and in doing so concedes this debate to me. Please vote Pro. Thank you. Ugh. Nowadays it is hard to get a good debate, or even one that lasts to the end
Against
- Next time you write argumentation I would highly suggest you do not create a wall of text that is more then two and a half pages long. Anyway on to business. Some of the first points you have addressed in your argument is that China (PRC) is dealing with numerous challenges…
- I accept.
- 138.
Walmart is good for America
For
- "My rebuttal is that there is limited space in other stores and if you are an american who needs a job you have to go to Wal-Mart who then can afford to pay low wages because that person has no where else to go and he needs this job. So they actually have to seek employment…
- As this argument is about how good Wal-Mart is for America, I would like to focus on America as a whole. While you may be correct in stating that Wal-Mart offers low wages and poor benefits, this is an issue with employment. Remember that Wal-Mart is not obligated to provide…
Against
- Thank you for joining this debate, I will rebutt my opponents points and move on to mine My opponent stated that "While you may be correct in stating that Wal-Mart offers low wages and poor benefits, this is an issue with employment. Remember that Wal-Mart is not obligated to…
- Thank you for joining this debate, I will first state a couple of my points, Wal-Mart does more harm than good by paying lower wages, decreased health care benefits and squeezing competitors out of the market. With the "squeezing" part, Playing the same old game when Wal-Mart…
- 139.
We should substantially subsidize the extraplanetary industry
For
- I want to begin by thanking Stephen_Hawkins for the debate and I would like to first address some administrative issues and then move on to my introduction and topical analysis for the resolution itself. Pursuant to PRO"s stipulation, I will present an affirmative case in the…
Against
- Rules:1) Definitions:Subsidised is defined by the Oxford English dictionary as "A sum of money granted by the government to assist an industry so that the price of a service may remain low and competitive". To make this clear, my opponent will affirm the partial aid by the…
- Unfortunately, my opponent forfeited his last round. As such, if he comes back, he is free to use his final round (instead of leaving it blank) to make both side equal. With the customary deduction of conduct from my opponent, I shall say "extent all arguments" and await a…
- 140.
More free-market capitalism will worsen the US economy
For
- con argues taxing the rich more doesn't help the lower class. it does, because they dont have to pay the taxes to support the programs being run. and, some of the programs directly benefit them such as food stamps etc. con argues taxing the rich more will just cause them to…
- my opening argument will be mostly borrowed from a recent article: US Set to Become the Newest Third World Country http://iacknowledge.net... "The United States, the home of Capitalism, is about to demonstrate its ultimate failure, as the cannibalistic economic system consumes…
Against
- It seems I am actually able to debate but it seems I do not need to. I carry on previous statements and ask people to vote, no matter who they choose.
- To start, I apologize for I will be unable to debate the final round but do not concede. I simply carry this and the round before it to the last. Now to the debate at hand: "Con argues taxing the rich more doesn't help the lower class. it does, because they dont have to pay the…
- 141.
Sarbanes-Oxley and similar legislation should be repealed
For
- >Are you saying that there should be no law against falsifying financial statements? Advertisements employ the art of persuasion, where rhetoric and innuendo are appropriate. Financial statements should be factually accurate by law because altering them with incorrect…
- Thank you, DarrowDobaksa, for taking up this debate. I do, however, disagree with your disagreement on several of my points. :) >It merely says, if you're going to do business in this country, you're going to do it honestly and fairly... or else. Why must those statements be…
Against
- Thank you. Your points are marked as >>. >>Why must those statements be honest by law? Is it because they are economically potent? Then pretty much every advertisement would be banned. Are you saying that there should be no law against falsifying financial statements?…
- Thank you for the opportunity. However, I disagree with your argument on several points. Your first claim is that corporate failures are not a social cost. This proposition assumes that SOX was designed to prevent corporate failures, but such is not the case. Corporations can…
- 142.
Bitcoin should be accepted as a method of payment
For
- okay, I can see how bitcoin should not be a way to pay but that whole statement saying something like "Penny's being $100" would it even be called a penny then but I don't see economy coming to that not at all. (also IT wont happen)
- I don't have anything to say I just want to know what you say
Against
- It was theoretical, money is worth more and less over time that's why exchange rates change, please try to argue and not just ask a question, if you want to just post it in the polls.
- Bitcoin should not be a way to pay, the price is always fluctuating so it would not be a stable currency. But technically speaking you can exchange bitcoin for money so it is already a way to pay. Currency is supposed to be stable if one day the penny became worth a hundred…
- 143.
There is no such thing as a free lunch
For
- For clarification purposes, my first argument clearly states "Nothing that any person has ever done for another person was completely without a price / reward of some sort." Even if you ate wild berries for lunch, it still costs the earth the berries grew out of nutrients.
- You may not have had to pay for your lunch, but that doesn't mean it was free. Someone had to pay for the food. Their reward, if nothing else, was the personal / spiritual fulfillment on the behalf of that person / those people.
Against
- Okay, but lets say a friend takes wild berry's and gives them to you for lunch. Sometimes he/she may not ask for something in return.Sometimes he/she may ask for something in return.So it can or cannot be a free lunch also, yes if you take wild berry's from the plants does mean…
- Well it depends. On this topic do you mean "There is no free lunch for myself" or do you mean" There is no free lunch overall". There is a thing called a free lunch for myself, but there is no free lunch overall, because someone has to pay for it in one way or another. Well…
- 144.
The United States should raise its minimum wage
For
- I would first like to refute my opponents arguments, and then strengthen my own case. My opponent stated in his first contention that the unemployment rates will increase. He stated that we are hurting the future of America if we raise the minimum wage, which I have already…
- I am in strong affirmation of the resolution, which states that the national minimum wage should be increased. I will now give my contentions. Contention 1: A $15/hour minimum wage won't result in major job losses because it would put money in the pockets of millions of…
Against
- I stand in firm negation of the resolution that states,"Resolved: Minimum wages in the United States should be raised to ensure the welfare of its people."I do not believe that we will have any arguments over the terms used in the resolution since all of them are well known…
- I accept this challenge and negate the resolution which is in favor of raising the federal minimum wage.
- 145.
Corporations need more government regulation
For
- There was no challenge to my second-round submission and therefore I suggest that nothing contained within it is challenged. I will now move to the well documented fact that mining and other companies that are based in Western Democracies behave in ways that plainly…
- My position is a simple and logical one it is based on the following: 1.Many businesses actually list in their mission statement that their primary objective is shareholder returns or building shareholder value. There is no reason to doubt that they are being honest when they…
Against
- I only have one side to make. Most people would argue that Corporations own large parts of Government. The US Government, States Governments, and even Governments overseas. Why? Because only government can legally create a monopoly, control prices, hinder competition, and…
- I gladly accept this debate on Corporations need more government regulation. It's a great topic in which I am very intrigued. I look forward to my opponents reasons for increased government regulation; and I also look forward to expressing my reasons against more regulation.…
- 146.
Churches should not be taxed
For
- Assuming that it's true that Being a Church implies that classified as serving the General Welfare & classified as serving the General Welfare implies that Ought not be Taxed, then it's true that Being a Church implies that Ought not be Taxed. Being a Church implies that…
Against
- Perhaps my opponent has merely forgotten to reply. I will check the comments section should he place his rebuttal there.
- I had to put this into Google Translate. You are saying that assuming churches serve the general welfare of the population, and the IRS lists churches as serving the welfare of the population, then they should not be taxed. This is based on assumptions which I will now tackle.…
- 147.
Libertarian economics is inherently immoral
For
- Welfare can never be morally justified a) Personal ownership, private property, and negative rights My opponent is correct when he observes we do not live in a vacuum: we actually live in a society based on the mutual co-operation of the members of that society. Under the…
- Libertarians believe that "all persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor" and income tax should, therefore, be abolished. Of course, this will leave an enormous black hole in the public finances but the Libertarians have a solution for this: slash public spending.…
Against
- Pro still has not provided any justification for his view of positive rights other than a few remarks about democracy and the impracticality of absolute property rights. Most of his objections I already covered in the first round under 1B. I'll briefly address the issues with…
- Thanks Brian, I look forward to a fun and rigorous challenge. Note that Pro has not explicitly attacked the moral underpinnings of libertarians. Rather, he has made an emotional appeal to the unwed teenage mothers, implying that he has in mind some positive account of rights.…
- 148.
Pure capitalism would be the most beneficial system for the world
For
- My constructive case is going to be kept very brief (and disappointingly low-quality) because it's 4am and I'm not going to have time again within the next 18 hours to write this (to hell with 24 hr time limits). Capitalism is the "most beneficial system for the world" because…
- I accept.
Against
- Good luck to my opponent and I hope we have a good debate. Now let's get started.I will be arguing that a system of true capitalism would be a very bad thing for this world. Contention 1: Capitalism is unsustainableCapitalism is growth based. "It has to run to stand" "It has to…
- Round 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Arguments, Pro is not allowed to rebut argumentsRound 3: Rebuttals of oponnents arguments, pro is not allowed to defend his argumentsRound 4: Defense of your arguments. Rules1.1. Don't troll.2. Keep your arguments on topic, while K's are allowed if…
- 149.
Labor unions harm the economy
For
- extend all arguments
- "Taxes will raise prices of merchandise, but not dramatically, because other competing businesses would try to stay at a low price." Yes taxes will raise prices of merchandise a lot over time. Hope you like math. you spend 350$ a week, under a non taxation sales tax zone. Under…
Against
- Wow. It takes much skill to copy and paste. No offense, but your refutations makes no sense (except the one that I broke one of the rules. Didn't see that). Taxes will raise prices of merchandise, but not dramatically, becuase other competing buisnesses would try to stay at a…
- To be truthful, this is a silly arguement, because it is so obvious, but I will be nevertheless happy to have this debate, no matter how easy. Labor unions absolutely do not hurt the economy. Labor unions are essential! Teachers, policemen, workers, farmers, all of them are…
- 150.
Cutting taxes would stimulate the economy
For
- I would like to remind myself and the Contender that you can not bring up any new points for Round Three. It is only for rebuttals and conclusions. Thank you.…
- With tax cuts, business owners would either expand their businesses or lower the prices. An overwhelming majority of businesses will take advantage of tax cuts for the sake of profit, either it be expanding themselves or lowering the prices. If they expand, it requires more…
Against
- The thing is about your sauce is its biased. Do you even know what Cato institute is? Its a libertarian website associated with right wing groups. Basically your augment is you repeating the same stuff, mostly cherry picked facts with a biased source. But then again isn't that…
- "With tax cuts, business owners would either expand their business or lower the prices." Yeah in theory but they don't. In an ideal world maybe big business would give us a break. But people are greedy and immoral. The money wouldn't go to expanding business to give people jobs…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?