Economy Debate Topics for Students
1,282 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1.
If music piracy is not stopped, the music industry will end
For
- If nothing stops piracy websites, piracy will grow. Eventually, such a large amount of people will steal music that record companies will give up on trying to sell it. There are no signs of piracy slowing down. And I don't think there's always going to be people who are just…
- Let's assume everyone listened to free music and musicians' only true money-making opportunity was performing. At first, the most popular artists would not suffer because of funding for their shows from the label. However, independent artists would disappear. Hypothetically, if…
Against
- Rebuttals "If nothing stops. .. .. .. (His entire argument which I will not copy because of character limit)" Why will people stop buying music? Yes, pirated music is free, BUT IT I ALSO ILLEGAL! People do not want to do illegal things. Conclusion My opponent does not prove…
- Rebuttals "Let's assume everyone listened to free music and musicians' only true money-making opportunity was performing. At first, the most popular artists would not suffer because of funding for their shows from the label. However, independent artists would disappear. ...…
- 2.
Welfare states are outdated and more efficient alternatives exist
For
- First of all, thank you for accepting this debate and I was actually referring to the UK welfare state but I suppose the debate can be applied to both nations. Now, I agree with some of these points that there aren't many alternatives but I believe as a nation if we were more…
- I believe the Welfare state, the government rule giving benefits to those in need of support through benefit payments and services, is outdated and in need of a replacement. First of all the welfare state is about merit goods i.e. goods that give significant benefits to the…
Against
- Oops, that's what happens when you make unsubstantiated assumptions. I must confess my ignorance on the nuances of the UK welfare system, but I'll do my best to extrapolate my US experience, and I apologize in advance if I miss my target. You say that "as a nation if we were…
- First, thanks to Wj for proposing this very interesting topic. I am making the assumption that the debate is focused on the current US situation, but if that is not the case I will be glad to expand it to other countries in the second round. Somebody -I think it was Churchill?-…
- 3.
The best way to increase wages is to decrease unemployment
For
- I am arguing against price controls for labor and labor unions. Instead, I am arguing that the government should, instead of focusing on raising wages, should focus on decreasing unemployment. My opponent can start in R1 or just accept. That is up to him/her.
- Looks like Con has no arguments *another forfeit*.
Against
- Accepted.I assume the debate will be:R1 AcceptanceR2 State ArgumentR3 Rebutals/ Closing Argument
- 4.
Communism will ultimately outperform capitalism
For
- You want hard facts?I'll give you hard facts."Some 795 million people in the world do not have enough food to lead a healthy active life. That's about one in nine people on earth." -Cited from the World Food Programme (https://www.wfp.org...).As for where these hungry people…
- My contentions are as follows: Capitalism is doomed to fail because of these reasons: 1. Capitalism, at its core, is an exploitative, oppressive system. Under this system, it has led to the wealth and success of nations and the bourgeoisie who control them, which has caused…
Against
- While Capitalism isn't a perfect system (no system truly is), it most certainly isn't oppressive. Every transaction that takes place is a voluntary one. Nobody is forced to do anything by any form of coercion whatsoever. Furthermore, my opponent claims that "hundreds and…
- Opponent: "In this debate, I will argue that the capitalist system is doomed to fail, and that communism will eventually prevail. My opponent will argue that this is not the case." As any debate demands, you need to show your evidence as to why Communism will prevail and why…
- 5.
The federal minimum wage should be raised to at least $15 per hour
For
- Extend All
- Extend all.
Against
- Rules: 1. No forfeits 2. Any citations or sources must be used within the character limit of the debate 3. No new arguments in the final round 4. Maintain a civil and decorous atmosphere 5. No trolling or semantics 6. No K's of the topic 7. My opponent accepts all of the…
- 6.
Southern Europe should stop using the euro
For
- Actually the US did not start as a single country but a confederation of states like the achean league and so forth. Money isn't everything Greece must keep the euro for now until it comes out of its economic pressure from the rebillion. Italy however is a rich country who…
- Ok I would actually seperate the US. And they would all unify into a new nazi germany it's europe come on unification does not go good over there. England and Greece being the only exception.
Against
- You keep giving the same argument. I think this means you have not at all another argument. To make this more clear I would appreciate it if you could list all your arguments.-we started it as a group so we should not break this group up.-it would cost us even more money than…
- I don't think so. I think Europe would become some kind of America. What I mean is, you would not like to separate America right. you all pay with the dollar even dough it sometimes does not go that well.
- 7.
Greece should leave the eurozone
For
- Thank you for joining my debate as it is also my first debate and would like to wish good look to both . I believe Con has made a major error in reading my original argument, it is about being kicked out of the euro zone NOT the EU. I believe that Greece should stay in the EU…
- Greece has already been paid billions of euros already ,causing the whole of europe to go in to turmoil . Spain and portugal are VERY close to Greece's postion and we do Not want the euro to go into crisis ,it is suffering at the moment and we dont want all the euro to go as…
Against
- Ah. Well, thank you for clarifying. And so, I hate to disappoint, but I feel that I haven't enough information on this subject at this time to continue. I withdraw my argument and forfeit the debate.However, I WOULD suggest re-posting this same debate--I'm sure that there will…
- Before I begin, I'd like to say that I am rather excited to take part in this debate--being my first. As well, while I AM an American, I hope to look at this from a different angle.Greece's economy, which as we all know, has caused near social collapse, would most likely fall…
- 8.
Capitalism has been the main liberator from grinding poverty
For
- I congratulate my opponent on a very innovative way of attempting to shift in an ingenious—dare I say, Fabian?—manner from the assertion that is interesting to most people, that capitalism does or does not advance the material interests of the poor in absolute terms, into a…
- As this debate format permits only a certain amount of written words, I will take the unsual step of acknowledging my opponent`s arguments and will not drop them as I would be considered to do by not responding. I make this limited rebuttal to allow him space to make a more…
Against
- I'm afraid Marxism is pertinent here and you must address it: no system can be called a 'liberator from grinding poverty', which produces grinding poverty and a status quo by which a subservient class tend to the needs of their superiors. This is counter-intuitive, which is why…
- No one is denying capitalism as a source of social change and concrete improvement. The socialism of Hegel and Marx was directed against the radical modern capitalism of their time: not capitalism in-itself (which in fact, Hegel defends). It is the extent of capitalism and the…
- 9.
The US should raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour
For
- I'm sorry my argument is stupid >< I didn't have enough time to research it correctly. I'm just going to say that It would help people who are working very hard but struggling to pay the bills.
- Acceptance! ^_^ The minimum wage should be raised to benefit families, immigrants, and middle class people all across america.
Against
- Extend arguments and rebuttals.
- Introduction:First of all, my opponent's argument is not stupid. Don't accept that interpretation as it is unfounded. It may be incorrect, as I shall attempt to demonstrate (as in any other debate), but it is not stupid. Hopefully we can have the chance to debate this topic to…
- 10.
Government intervention in the economy is necessary
For
- (See above.)
- (See above.)
Against
- I have to respectfully forfit from this debate due to computer troubles. I would not be able to fairly have a discussion with you due to my computer troubles. Please forgive me. Thank you for your understanding.
- Welcome to this debate on the economy & economics. The debate is "We need Government Intervention in the economy", in the form of things such as subsidies, bailouts, central banks, deficit spending, wage controls, but overall, just economic planning. I will be argue against…
- 11.
The United States should absorb the world's debt for nothing
For
- "Taking on someone else's debt doesn't eliminate it. Someone is still owed money, so how does that really solve anything in the economic sector? "It gives nations that are far more mindful of their spending then us a clean slate to start fresh now that they know to be careful.…
- The reason why the US should take on the debt of the entire world for nothing in return..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Is because we are already F*CKED Of the 50 trillion in debt the world…
Against
- My numbered points are going to match up with ima's bolded statements from this round. And for all of you wondering what the kryptonite to imabench's trolling is? It's a serious debate. 1. How do we get a clean slate by taking on debt? And how does taking away someone's debt…
- 1. Taking on Debt Doesn't Eliminate DebtTaking on someone else's debt doesn't eliminate it. Someone is still owed money, so how does that really solve anything in the economic sector? The money is still owed and there still isn't anyone paying it. The real danger of debt is not…
- 12.
Government should intervene to lower college costs
For
- I have a puppy, but I prefer my cat most of the time. She enjoys eating. A lot.
- I like cats.
Against
- Yep.
- I like cats, too. Not really a dog person.
- 13.
Hosting the Olympics is a good investment for cities
For
- COUNTERPOINT Any large expenditure in one area will stimulate regeneration. Considering that the cost of hosting the London 2012 Olympics is predicted at £2.375 billion, expected to rise far higher, regeneration is the least that can be expected as a le
- Hosting creates a 'feel-good' factor
Against
- Hosting is very expensive
- Hosting only affects one city
- 14.
Apple is a terrible company
For
- Its over! Apple is a terrible company!
- 1) Labor Sweatshop labor, child Labor and employee abuse. Apple abuses labor that can be classified with each of these descriptors. "'We have to work too hard and I am always tired. It's like being in the army. They make us stand still for hours. If we move we are punished by…
Against
- Acceptance Round! Let's Go!
- 15.
A small group of capitalists controls the economy
For
- The UN is full of them, and if you cannot recognize that then I cannot help you. I won't do the research for you, you will have to do it yourself. This is nothing like proving God, that is impossible. Marxism and capitalism are two ideals that are easy to recognize, you just…
- Prove there are not Marxist capitalists, as that is your claim now. The BOP is your again. There are so many of the rich that are Marxist, that is just a fact, and no matter how many lies you spew to evade the truth, the truth never lies. Are you are Marxist Capitalist denier?
Against
- 'The UN is full of them,' this is an opinion not a fact , it is not an argument as it is not backed up by any evidence. 'and if you cannot recognize that then I cannot help you.' How about not starting a debate when you don't have an argument.' I won't do the research for you,…
- 'Prove there are not Marxist capitalists, as that is your claim now.' That is equivelent to a Christian telling an Atheist to prove God doesn't exist as I have showed in the previous round the BoP is on Pro. he is the one that has to prove they exist , either way they cannot…
- 16.
Capitalism is better than socialism or communism
For
- That's fine. I know the difference between Communism and Socialism. Communism is when all land and property is controlled by the government. Socialism is when all land and property is owned by the community. This sparks a big problem and this is what I will be covering. With…
- So therefore, I will introduce myself. I will be arguing that Capitalism runs circles around Socialism and or Communism. Good luck Opponent! ! !
Against
- I would first challenge the accuracy of the source you are using for your definitions, Socialism simply seeks government control over companies that are so large that they could have disastrous effects on the economy. Something that was shown to the United States in the 2008…
- Canada is a socialist country, as is Sweden. For those that fall in between, I would argue that they all far on the more socialist side of things than capitalist, even the United States. As for us not trusting anyone to be that selfless, that is the largest flaw of Capatalism,…
- 17.
Businesses should charge extra for shopping bags
For
- Pro: Businesses should charge extra for bags.Con: Businesses should not charge extra for bags.At the grocery store, pharmacy, mall, etc. businesses should charge extra for plastic bags. Or any type of bag for that matter. 8,000 character maxcomment for questionscon cannot give…
- There was no debate, so I will extend the argument from round two and conclude by jumping on my soap box...Try to be aware of how much garbage you contribute to our one and only (for now) home. If everyone takes in one less plastic bag a month, there would be close to 84…
Against
- round 1. I will acsept this debate, only because i want to see what you have to say...
- 18.
The United States should promote free trade
For
- This is for the DDO Olympics politics and government bracket. If you have any questions about the debate format below, mention them before you accept the debate. Full ResolutionThe United States Federal Government should promote a policy of free trade. BoP is on…
- That's fine; don't worry about it. It was a good one round debate.
Against
- Thanks for understanding.
- Sorry, I can't finish this. I have a drill comp Friday-Sunday then on Monday-Tuesday I have Model UN at the Ramada Inn. So I'm sorry that I cannot finish this debate.
- 19.
Three percent annual economic growth is unsustainable
For
- I would like to start by pointing out that in his rebuttal Con made several arguments against mine that were fact instead of logic based without citing sources. (Other than a Wikipedia biography-essentially pointless.) 1. Con asserts that globalization has helped the economy,…
- "The burden of proof is on you, because you are proving that economic growth is unsustainable. I must prove that an economy can grow indefinitely (within reason)." So I guess that BoP is on both of us then. As you state- "burden of proof is on you" and "I must prove". 1. a.…
Against
- Rebuttal:To 1aThis is an absurd argument. Of course the world will face wars and terrorism and immigration, and of course these are not good for growth. But despite wars, and terrorism, and immigration, the developed world grew at a relatively consistent pace for the 20th…
- I will provide a rebuttal of this argument."The problem with a constant growth in GDP is that in such a globalized world you can't just expect other countries to let your country grow."Actually, you can. Globalization has actually helped economic growth - look at all of the…
- 20.
Monopolies should be illegal
For
- Apple owns the monopoly for the IPAD...I fail to see how this supports your argument, so I won't refute it. All of this true.Wal-Mart...Wal-Mart does not yet have a monopoly on stores. If it did, there would be no motivation for low prices, because people couldn't shop anywhere…
- Reason 1: Monopolies do not benefit the consumer.If a company has a monopoly on a product, there is a pretty good chance that it is going to charge customers through the nose for it. The company, after all, has complete assurance that nobody can offer the product at a lower…
Against
- Explanation for Apple v Samsung: The courts have interested Apple has having the monopoly on the IPAD via a patent, it clearly states this numerous times within the transcripts: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com... , http://www.slate.com... The reason for this claim…
- Apple v Samsung. Although Apple own the monopoly for the IPAD, it does not own the rights to the cheaper Samsung where the courts found that it was not abusing its monopoly power as Samsung originally asserted. Furthermore, it was found that, although the Samsung product looked…
- 21.
A progressive tax system is fairer than a flat tax
For
- What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I…
- the rich should pay a luxory tax, which pays for all the spending that is done on the poor. why is it fair to make everyone pay it when most people are just able to take care of themselves and not taking such large amounts of resources?imagine if the earth was owned by a…
Against
- Previous stands! Hey dairy sorry I missed your challenge for single payer. Send it again, I would love to debate that topic.
- I am sorry, was this a debate re-enactment of Billy Madison or are we discussing Progressive tax vs. Flat tax in terms of fairness? Progressive Tax: a tax in which the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. Flat Tax: a tax system with a constant marginal rate,…
- 22.
Air fares should reflect the combined weight of passengers and luggage
For
- Next, I would like to challenge my opponent's statistics. He claims that the average American weighs 177lbs / 80kg, and while I broadly agree with this figure (my source actually states 178lbs / 80.5kg), aviation is an international industry and the average global body weight…
- As a result of international sanctions, certain commodities are in very short supply in Iran and last month my friend "Insane" Hussein Avhadmedinnerdad, who is a stallholder in Tehran's Grand Bazaar, asked me to send him a consignment of cornflakes over as they cannot be…
Against
- The average American weighs 177 pounds(1). If we assume that the average hold baggage weighs 20 pounds, then each person brings, on average, 197 pounds with them. Now, the average fuel cost per person is about $65(2). 197 divided by 65 is equal to 33 cents per pound. For the…
- I'm sorry, but I just don't have the time to do this properly. I forfeit.
- 23.
The gender wage gap is a myth
For
- lol why do you care so much. your stupid an
- Thank you very much for continuing this debate. For 1, I apologize. This is around, say, my fifth debate on DDO, and all of them until now have been rather informal. You are probably the first person I have had a debate of this type with. (And I very much appreciate you for…
Against
- While I appreciate your offer to start a new debate with a more refined resolution, I'm perfectly content to continue this one. While I do believe that the semantic arguments entitle me to a win (Vote Con! ), I am more than happy to continue to discuss the substance of your…
- I'm looking forward to our discussion.1. The resolution cannot be proved. We are debating the resolution "The 'Wage Gap' Will Forever Be a Myth. " To prove this statement true, Pro not only must show that the 'Wage Gap' is a myth today, but that it will be a myth forever,…
- 24.
Tipping should be abolished immediately
For
- My opponent claims that "if the absence of tips would raise the price of the food, then logically the tips lower the price of food". This statement does not respond in any way to my explanation in round 2 so I assume that my opponent cannot counter it. I do not deny that a…
- I would like to counter each paragraph separately. "My opponent's arguments are generally that the businesses that hire the people these people don't pay them enough, and that they keep the extra profits. This is extremely flawed. First of all, my opponent acknowledges that the…
Against
- My opponent's explanation in round two was as follows: "I merely said that food prices would go up if employers were to grant a greater share of their profit to their employees. " This means that under the current system, including tips, food prices are lower than they…
- If the absense of tips would raise the price of the food, then logically the tips lower the price of food. You can't get around this. You also can't deny that the tip provides incentive to be good. If the service is poor, the customer has the power to leave no tip at all. I…
- 25.
Wealthy people should be required to donate to the poor
For
- First, I would like to start with some rebuttal. The rich people pay taxes, I will not deny that, but taxes don't exactly go directly to the poor. They are used to build roads, sometimes restaurants, and hospitals, but mainly all goes to the military. Because of this, the poor…
- Rich people should be required to donate to the poor because the poor are in need and rich people have a lot of money. The poor could use the money to get their life back up and running. It is also helpful to the poor and it is a form of generosity because you are helping…
Against
- Rebuttal:" I will not deny that, but taxes don't exactly go directly to the poor. They are used to build roads, sometimes restaurants, and hospitals, but mainly all goes to the military."-There are many public services funded by tax, and I will mention them in my rebuttal."Poor…
- I would like to remind Pro that rich people are already doing this. That's what taxes are for. People pay tax to the government, who provide public services to the people of the nation, which would include poor people. [1][2] Therefore, it is implied that Pro's resolution…
- 26.
India's economic growth will make its citizens prosperous
For
- India can prosper and emerge as a superpower if cordial and amicable relation exist between the hindus and muslim. Indian modern history serves a testimony to this .
Against
- Well...
- Everyone's forfeiting my debates. It should be included as part of a one world government so their isn't clashing between states
- 27.
Direct taxes are a bad way to fund government
For
- I am surprised that con does not realize he is the one with little economic understanding. He has also failed to provided his philosophical debate and instead turned away from the rules of this debate and made it a factual one. I'll keep this short and to the point. For my…
- "Direct taxes are used to counter income inequality" That statement is not only invalid but it is constitutionally wrong. We are a capitalist country founded on principles that protect a persons right to the fruits of their labor. To redistribute wealth is a extremely socialist…
Against
- I would like to address Pro's rather ignoble comments before I close. I accused Pro of little economic understanding because he uses economic terms loosely and confusingly. Further, he claims that no relationship exists between taxation and inflation, and any economic students…
- I am astonished at Pro's lack of economic understanding. I shall begin by rebutting Pro's initial arguments.1. Direct taxes kill incentiveDirect taxes, unless progressive, do not "kill incentive". Incentive to work harder is "killed" when an individual pays more tax as his…
- 28.
Smart cities cause inflation
For
- Let me clarify that I am not a Luddite who is against deploying new technology. I am merely arguing that technology is a useful tool for achieving other objectives and is not a goal in itself. smart cities are ultimately about clustering smart people and not steel-and-chrome…
- No Sources have been mentioned in the second round because it is a result of my original thinking.
Against
- Well, apparently my opponent agrees with me that he has the full burden of proof (since he didn't argue with me). This being the case, I have already won the debate. After all, he plagiarized the first round, fell into a logical fallacy in the second round, and didn't make an…
- Well, apparently my opponent doesn't deny his plagiarism, and wishes to continue the debate. I am happy to oblige him. First things first... Burden of Proof As the instigator and the one making the positive claim, my opponent has the full burden of proof. He has to make a case…
- 29.
Governments should provide food and money to care for the poor
For
- Good afternoon DDO. Today our topic is that the governments should give money/food to the poor. I am Pro and the opponent is Con.Rules1. No forfeiting2. No "kk's"3. No trolling4. BOP is on Pro5. If you are not over the ELO of 2500, you cannot accept.Defintions1. Government: The…
- I totally rebutted everything. I know I didn't rebut the third so I will right now. 3. Even though the government can't help every single one who is in poverty, they have to at least help. The government's job is to takes care of the citizens. They must at least do something.…
Against
- Accepted.
- Pro says "I totally rebutted everything. I know I didn't rebut the third so I will right now" this is completely false. He didn't rebut my: Dependence case and he didn't say anything about my alternatives. Therefore, he didn't rebut any of my points. He left my alternative…
- 30.
A 30-hour work week and higher minimum wage should be adopted
For
- "Pro as not addressed any of the issues that I raised in round 1. Preventing me from gaining a clearer understanding of their own personal agenda. " That's because you didn't mention any real issues. You built some straw man involving "job sharing" and said "are unemployment…
- So my argument is that a 40 hour work week makes life generally difficult for the average person. Sure, We as a society have somewhat adjusted to it, But the stress of work piles up greatly and if a person has kids and works 40 hours a week, Then they have no free time. What…
Against
- This is a typical I am right and you are wrong debate. I get the impression that Pro is actually debating their own personal agenda rather than a greater U. S. Socio-political agenda. In the spirit of debate I addressed all of Pro's issues. Yet Pro still dismisses all of my…
- Ok: So Pro presents a plan. But is it a workable plan, And relative to a capitalist society of nearly 330million people. As yet Pro has not presented any evidential or statistical back up. Also: Pro as not addressed any of the issues that I raised in round 1. Preventing me from…
- 31.
Collective bargaining is needed to give workers a voice
For
- Collective bargaining is needed by people in any job. Within any firm there exist feedback structures that enable workers to communicate with managers and executive decision makers. However, there are some issues which affect workers significantly, but run against the…
- The bargain between normal unions and private enterprise involves all parties being brought to the table and talking about the issues that they might have. However, the public sector represents the benefits of taxpayers, the politicians and the unions. The power that unions…
Against
- Collective bargaining might hurt the democratic process due to its political nature, but the alternative is worse. Without collective bargaining it is incredibly difficult for public sector workers to get across their ideas of what their pay should be to their employers. This…
- Even if collective bargaining leads to a workforce that is better able to communicate their ideas, it also leads to a situation as mentioned within the proposition arguments that results in unions having significantly more power over their wages and the government than in other…
- 32.
Crackdowns on international tax havens are worthwhile
For
- With regard George Soros, he avoids paying tax - which is legal, not evades paying tax - which is illegal. The aim of the international community is not to criminalize fabulously wealthy individuals such as Soros, but, instead, to minimise their opportunities to dodge their…
- World leaders at the recent G20 meeting in London agreed that it is time to close the net on tax evaders by putting the squeeze on international tax havens such as the Cayman Islands and Gibraltar (1). Of course, if the established offshore banks are forced to close their…
Against
- Pro argues that the likes of Soros "have the opportunity to shift money below the authorities radar" while "decent ordinary families are paying shifty tycoons tax bills." Actually, there is no reason why anyone couldn't use a foreign tax haven to speculate in current exchange.…
- Pro did not define a "tax haven." The common sense definition is also the one most often given in references: "A country offering very favorable tax laws for foreign businesses and individuals." http://www.investorwords.com... Seven other definitions provided on the web all are…
- 33.
Food should be distributed equally among all US citizens
For
- I think Food Should be given out equaly
Against
- My opponent has forfeited the two previous rounds and started with just a one sentence premise. I had hopes for a robust discussion. Given these facts I should be judged objectively as the winner. Thank you.
- My opponent has fortified the round. If Pro still wishes to used round 3 to post an response I will invite it. If there is no response I should be judged the winner. Thank you.
- 34.
The Federal Reserve should be abolished
For
- Thanks for accepting imabench. I am taking the stance that the Fed needs to be ended for the sake of preserving economic prosperity and controlling the unbridled greed of the international banksters. My position rests on three main premises: that the Fed is UNCONSTITUTIONAL,…
- I'm no economics expert, I'll say that up front. However, from all that I've read, I don't think it takes one to realize that the Federal Reserve is hurting the US economy, and has done so ever since its creation in 1913. It pains me to see the OWS protesters going on about…
Against
- Ill make this quickThese was the Con's original comments of the Fed and the Great Depression," The Great Depression is almost never blamed on the Fed when taught in schools, but in reality the Fed's artificial manipulation of boom and bust cycle was the cause of the Great…
- http://nesara.org... The Fed was clearly ruled as an independent agency but the Pro failed to mention other facts about the case. Even though it was ruled to not be a government agency, the Fed is "..... a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The…
- 35.
eBay is better than Amazon
For
- Idgaf what the topic is. Alright Basketball or Cricket?
- What is wrong with the world that art not trust each other anymore? What happened to the early days of Adam and Eve where it was all sunshine and happiness? Truth is, Ebay has a far better layout and not utterly confusing as Amazon.
Against
- Unbelievable. You're an imbecile.
- That's just it! People are not honest, therefore to use the more reliable site would give you the trust that you are buying and that you will be receiving just what you paid for. The topic of this debate is not whether the layout is better, we are talking in general terms.
- 36.
Capitalism is superior to other economic systems
For
- Capitalism : " an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market." (1)…
- Sorry for the delay. I will give my opponent the oppertunity to go first in this debate as I will not need that more than one argument to debate this topic.
Against
- Unfortunately, his proposition is based on a false premise and furthermore a system that will likely be limited to our era and technology. The false premise of the supremacy of capitalism is that we live in a world of unlimited resources. We obviously do not. Capitalism has…
- I am not sure what you are comparing it to. If you are comparing it to any other system, and not limiting to me a specific system, I will argue it is not superior and will argue why in the following rounds.
- 37.
Restaurant bills should not include automatic gratuity
For
- When someone goes out to eat at a restaurant usually the person waiting on them is making $2.13 per hour. They rely solely on the customer's tip to servive. If most restaurant's automatically add a 15-20% tip to parties of 8 or more, why not be universal and add it to all…
Against
- It saddens me that my opponent could not continue this elaborate dance with words as dancing alone doesn't produce the kind of feeling which many enjoy. Alas, extend all of my arguments. Bottom line: My opponent has provided you with a good enough reason as to why restaurant…
- It's a shame my opponent was not able to continue this round. Please extend all of my arguments to round 2.
- 38.
The amount of foreign aid given by developed countries should be increased
For
- It"s my first time, so please don"t crush me :P That being said, let"s head onto the definitions. We define foreign aid as wealth that is given from one country to another, and we define developed countries to be countries with a sustainable economy and high human development.…
- If you will still support your argument that wealth is equivalent to weapons and such, then so be it: I will argue within those definitions, then. But I will take note that you still haven't stated any objections to the entailed plan given in Round 3. Side Proposition's plan is…
Against
- I accept.
- This is an important debate. To the voters, when deciding who won this debate, ask yourselves two questions. They are as follows: Is foreign aid beneficial to the interests of developing countries? Is foreign aid beneficial to the interests of developed countries? The answer to…
- 39.
Free market capitalism is a better system than socialism
For
- I feel it would be unfair to double up on my opponent so I will allow him another chance to argue his side, I would however like to continue this debate in a second part if my opponent would accept the challenge.
- To begin with I will argue your opening couple of sentences. You claim that the biggest flaw of free market capitalism is that it causes "Economic disparity and facilities exploitation". I will start with economic disparity which when i searched for the definition directed me…
Against
- First I will argue that Free Market Capitalism is not as fair as Socialism. (On the subject of Free Market Capitalism) The biggest flaw that it has is that it causes Economic Disparity and facilitates exploitation. The main purpose of a Private Sector company or corporation is…
- I accept your challenge,my opening argument will be in the next round.
- 40.
Governments should pay homemakers for unpaid domestic work
For
- In conclusion I would like to present a summary of my points and counter arguments. Housewives should be paid by the government because they experience higher amounts of stress than women who work, Being near children for mothers causes three times as much stress than fathers,…
- I going to start off by saying that I never wrote that women on maternity leave are housewives. I simply said that they should also be paid by the government because it would benefit both them and employers. You also said that they are employed, But this is only a technicality.…
Against
- I apologise, I think you misunderstood part of my last argument. Women on maternity leave, As I mentioned before, Are not housewives, As they don't choose to leave work. Their child is born, And so they get a few weeks off. This isn't usually something that'll happen more than…
- Coincidentally this is also my first debate, So I guess that way we're both newbies. Welcome! As in introduction to my argument I would like to question your definition of "housewives". You state that, When deciding which women should be payed by the government, Women on…
- 41.
Taxes on high earners should be increased
For
- Amid the worst financial cataclysm since the Great Depression, one factor remains constant: discussions in the Beltway are centered around deficit reduction and what can be "slashed" from the budget. They speak of short-term pain in order to prevent long-term pain. But who…
- I ask at this point that we both refrain from using new sources and arguments, except to respond to lingering claims. This debate was intended address taxation, but went on to address the the role of government. You claim that the government is inefficient, but cannot source…
Against
- First of all this debate has gotten off track but to start off I am sorry for little sources. All my info is from the Mises institute rothsbard Friedman and hayek. Thats two noble prize winners to your one. Second your basic argument is that Depressions are bad They can be…
- Ok, the you have said that government needs to stimulate a economy in a ressecion. This is not true. A economic depression is a very healthy process. This is were companies withdraw miscalculated capital and use it for better purposes. That is why there is a depression. This is…
- 42.
The United States should prioritize tax increases over spending cuts
For
- My opponent has forfeited this round. Extend all contentions.
- Sorry, but unless I'm mistaken, round two is supposed to be used for questioning the opponent's case. It seems as though you have no questions for me, but in response to your "general refutations," The point of an online debate is to practice writing speeches. Your refutations…
Against
- That is a very nice arguement but these taxes will not benefit us citizens. (To shorten this because im lazy im going to list facts that will generally refute your case. If theres a specific arguement or impact i will tell you) "The confluence of fiscal policy changes scheduled…
- (this first arguments are going to be short) subpoint a Spending cuts should be prioritized because tax increases would put to much pressure on the poor according to new York times these tax increases on the whole population would make the average American pay 3 and half…
- 43.
Taxing the rich would benefit the economy
For
- Obviously, due to my forfeit and my opponent's two forfeits, the nature of this debate was altered from the format that Con laid out in round 1. We never fully addressed the second position argument, and never had a round solely confined to rebuttal. With that said, we both got…
- Since Both my opponent and I have forfeited, it seems best that I will further argue my first argument in this round, while attempted to refute my opponents as well. Since both my argument and my opponents are somewhat similar (though arguing opposite ends), and we will have no…
Against
- Kudos to my opponent for providing a well thought out debate! Just to clarify to the voters, my opponents "Introduction" which states what he is arguing is suitable and will be the topic of judgment. First Argument: Taxing the rich ($250,000+) reduces job creation and company…
- Finally! Thank you for accepting! In this debate I will show how increasing the wealthy's tax rates will hurt the U.S economy. First argument: Taxing the super rich ($250,000+) reduces job creation and company expansion. It is the wealthy, who primarily create jobs and provide…
- 44.
A just society should ban property taxes
For
- Here we debate whether you should be taxed over land you own. This does not include transactions to buy or sell exct. land. The rounds are as follows. 1 Acceptance 2 Cases 3 Arguments 4 Defending 5 Summarizing
Against
- I claim victory.
- I think that we should have property tax. I am the only one to state an argument, therefore I am winning.
- 45.
The US faces a shortage of high-tech workers and scientists
For
- "There are plenty of qualified people for high tech and science jobs. The problem is that the employers are looking for too specific of skill requirements and are not willing to pay enough or train" Now support your argument please. Give me some proof. You will remain disproven…
- How did they get their degree's in the first place? Simple, my man: old fashioned cheating and cramming of course! Me? Not serious? I am being perfectly serious! You only have to look at my debate about obesity to see that (http://www.debate.org...)
Against
- There are plenty of qualified people for high tech and science jobs. The problem is that the employers are looking for too specific of skill requirements and are not willing to pay enough or train. I rest my case. I really think you are just funning here.
- If they were so 'lazy' how did they manage to get their degrees in the first place? I do not think you are being serious.
- 46.
The United States could become self-sufficient in oil
For
- The debate is only about economic self-sufficiencyThis debate is narrowly focused on whether the U.S. could be self-sufficient on oil for 50 years with oil prices at $100 per barrel. Perhaps global warming will kill us all, but that's not an issue here. Nor is the issue issue…
- Proven and Total ReservesAn oil company having publicly traded stock must disclose how much oil it has remaining in its oil fields. The value of that oil is used by investors to appraise the value of the company. Con correctly quoted the standard for evaluating proven reserves…
Against
- Roy has raised a very interesting and very important topic with this debate. It lies at the heart of our ability as nation to survive. The 20th and 21st centuries are marked by our stewardship of energy.Pro initially framed the debate not in the broad sense of energy…
- In Round 3 Roy makes a case for the as-yet unproven supplies currently in areas off limits for exploration. Again this relies on estimations and obviously there is a limitation on how well one can outline the amout of material in place in those areas and how much of it actually…
- 47.
A small positive inflation rate is good for the economy
For
- The resolution is "A small but positive rate of inflation can be good for an economy."For my first debate on this site as pro, I will be arguing that some inflation can be a good thing. In the debate inflation has the meaning from http://www.merriam-webster.com... #2: a…
- It looks like we're going to get deeper economic algebra than I expected, and I'm excited by the challenge of getting into some math while still trying to make my arguments accessible to the casual reader. As a side note, I use the terms "floating" and "fiat" currency…
Against
- I accept the terms of this debate as well as the definition of inflation.
- I must admit that it will be difficult to follow such a start. However, I will still attempt to present a strong enough case for why inflation, whether small or large, is not beneficial for an economy. Today, in the United States, the main concern is the economy. This current…
- 48.
Raising the minimum wage will help the US economy
For
- Right off the bat we are going to have to agree to disagree about Keynesian economics if you are a believer in Jean- Baptiste Say theory of economics we are just not going to see eye to eye. Yes, the Federal Reserve is thinking about raising interest rates, but according to The…
- Meaning I believe that raising the minimum wage will help the Economy. According to the Keynesian economics if the consumers spirits are low it is the responsibility of the government to start spending money in order for consumers to trust the market again. So in order to…
Against
- I'll first respond to Pro's rebuttals to my R1 arguments: 1) It's the wrong time for stimulus, the economy is heating upPro counters by with text from a blog at the economist. com, which includes the following: "The Fed now believes that the time for those unusual measures is…
- Ah, a nice, relatively short debate.MW = minimum wage There are major issues with bringing Keynes into this debate: First, the economy is heating up to the point that there is talk of the federal reserve raising interest rates very soon. Keynesians advocate stimulus when the…
- 49.
The US federal government should help modernize developing countries
For
- Alright then, if you read the comments below I have been extremely busy. Right now I am taking time out of a vacation with my family and good friend Luke Cumbee (tournament director) to write this speech. The fact that I didn't write a second speech doesn't disqualify me, that…
- Round 5: (Pro) girr_29 (Con) Astrosfan Topic 14: The United States Federal Government should help to modernize third-world countries. I look forward to what should be a very fun round, and I would like to thank the judges before hand for taking their time to read through the…
Against
- so this next round is going to be short because i'm at debate camp right now and i don't have much time, but here we go on the definition debate 1. extend my argument that help requires that the pro must actually act 2. extend my argument that modernization must be a…
- Lets get down to business I will go in the same order as my opponent but I will add a new section laying out my case at the end ========= Definitions ========= Should- I agree with my opponent Help- I would like to redefine as: 1: to give assistance or support to…
- 50.
Internet service costs should be reduced for consumers
For
- I think that Internet bills should be reduced because think about the people who are living without a way to communicate. If there is an emergency, And they need to call 911, How are they going to do so without the Internet! Internet prices should be reduced for those peoples…
- If you think about it, We are paying a lot considering we are also paying for our car, House, Electricity, Water, Heating, AC, Etc. Then we pay more than we would like to, Just to get stalked by the government. Why should we pay so much, To get stalked?
Against
- Internet bills and telephone bills are actually not the same thing. This may come as a surprise.
- Just to get "stalked by the government? " If you don't want to pay your wifi bill just because of a conspiracy theory, Fine by me. However, 1: the government does not provide internet, Other nongovernment services do, And 2: You aren't being forced to pay for a car, Or any of…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?