Technology Debate Topics — page 8
636 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 351.
Online communication is good for society
For
- I accept your challenge.
- 1) "Instant communication has improved people's access to information. More and more people are getting connected and informed compared to people in the past. In a sense, information is more free than ever. First reading was limited to the educated elite. Then most learned how…
Against
- I repeat myself again. This is my first point. Cyber communication decreases the credibility and productivity of an individual while doing a task. For example, todays society on wifi is not a debateable topic anymore. This makes every company owning wifi. So,the company has the…
- Cyber communication decreases the credibility and productivity of an individual while doing a task. For example, todays society on wifi is not a debateable topic anymore. This makes every company owning wifi. So,the company has the legal rights on checking on their employee…
- 352.
Increased internet exposure has benefited children
For
- I would first like to say thank you to Alex.Fisher for starting such an interesting debate topic! I hope that this will be educational and interesting for all involved. Now, on with the debating! The Internet has indeed transformed education. Before the advent of the Internet,…
Against
- asdf
- Although the internet has helped develop schooling outside the traditional education system, the question is, is it actually good for a child to "have access to more information than any college library"? Of course, the internet has a vast array of relevant information that…
- 353.
Chatbots like Cleverbot show AI will eventually become sentient
For
- Pythagoras said, "Everything is number." - I will make a series of arguments which I will tie together at the end: A. My first point is that the communication of complex ideas is critical for Intelligence. This is the number one thing that sets us, as humans, apart from most…
- Definitions: Cleverbot-a computer program that learns to mimic speech (see cleverbot.com) Artificial Intelligence-A man made machine which can imitate intelligence Sentience-The ability to feel or perceive. (for this debate, Sapience will be assumed to be synonymous) First I…
Against
- == Pro Case == 1a. I agree that the ability to communicate complex ideas is a *necessary* condition for intelligence and sentience, however, Pro has yet to demonstrate that it is a *sufficient* one. The way a computer syntactically processes language is not qualitatively…
- Thanks, Pro. Artificial intelligence is an idea that's been around for decades, yet we've made little tangible progress toward achieving it. I'll begin with evidential arguments against "weak" AI before moving on to a deeper critique of "strong" AI, or the possibility that…
- 354.
Social networks should be banned for children under 16
For
- I agree that a lot of people in the world have difficulties with communication skills without the presence of social networks in their life. So if that people have problems, there is nothing to say about children. They have just been surfing the Web from the cradle. Children…
- Well, thank you for your opinion. Nevertheless, I believe that social networks should be prohibited for children as they result in inability of a child to emotionally and socially connect to the people they meet. He\she dives into the virtual world deeper and deeper and loses…
Against
- Your argument does make sense to a point, but the thing you have to consider is the fact that in some cases, like if people in "real-life" don't have much in common with you, or you are in a place where people aren't worth talking to, these networks are the ONLY things giving…
- As a 15 year old, I have grown up in a world where social networks were not only invented, but improved upon. Through the many different kinds of social networks, whether they be picture sharing, status updaters, or whatever else, I'm able to keep in contact with people that I…
- 355.
People's privacy is threatened by current trends in internet media
For
- Looks like I forfeited most rounds in this debate. Oh well. You can take off a point against me for Conduct! Nevertheless, when voting for Convincing Arguments, I urge you to keep in mind which side gave the better arguments. Let me begin by noting that most of my opponent's…
- Extend.
Against
- Thank you trendem for taking part in the debate. With such a technologically advanced system today our privacy is not threatened by the internet, as we mainly have to agree to terms and conditions and if you accept it it means that you acknowledge the risks and dont mind. My…
- Please elaberate your arguments
- 356.
Social networking websites have a positive impact on the United States
For
- Ok, I will concede the definition of on-balance and go with yours. I agree that it means with all things considered and equally weighed. However, I once again offer up my definition of positive being to be admitting of no doubt or irrefutable fact (American Heritage second…
- My opponent says we must go with his/her definition because he got it from "multiple sources" I quote my source as www.investordwords.com/3410/onbalance.html Therefore we must go with my definition of one balance whihc is the overall effect or net result. The definition of…
Against
- [Final arguments and major voting issues.] 1. The Pro contradicts himself by saying that he uses his def. of on balance, but later refers to mine in the defined resolution. I count this as a concession to my def. 2. The Pro provides a very confusing definition of positive which…
- [I will start by attacking my opponent's case, then moving on to rebuild my case.] The first argument I make on my opponent's case is that "on balance" has already been defined in the round, the definition I present comes from as many sources as possible to provide a clearer…
- 357.
PCs and Macs are basically the same
For
- 1. "That's just plain stupid." That's a matter of opinion. By enabling Windows to run on a Mac, you get the best of both worlds. Also, you don't have to shut down and reboot if you want to use Windows. You can simply run VMware, which requires a simple click. Don't generalize…
- All right. Here we go. I guess I'll just stick through the 1-5 thing so people can follow easier. 1. Considering that Boot Camp allows you to run Windows natively and that Macs and PCs are built with mostly the same parts (Intel processors, HD video cards, etc etc,) your…
Against
- 1. VMWare is essentially an emulator - adding another layer of things to go wrong between the OS and the secondary UI. My point about adding another layer stands - there's simply no way to run both OS's at the same time without turning off the computer unless you build a custom…
- 1. If you buy a Mac and run Windows natively, then that's just plain stupid. Buy a PC instead... Unless you want the pain and hassle of shutting down and restarting into the Mac OS every time you want to use the Mac stuff. No doubt the graphics on Macs are better when buying…
- 358.
Social networks should do more to stop cyberbullying
For
- Cyberbullying has been a big issue, especially on social networks. Many people (including adults, even) can head online, head on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, etc. Boom. They have automatic access to cyberbully. And spite many attempts to stop this cruel phenomenon, it continues.…
Against
- Resolution Negated.
- Extend.
- 359.
People should be allowed to use cell phones in movie theaters
For
- I will be arguing people SHOULD be allowed to have cell phones in public movie theaters. Good luck to the Con side and have fun! I am now ready to hear Con's opening argument.
- I will begin this round with addressing my opponents rebuttal. "However, in Regal Cinemas for example, guests are asked to refrain from using cell phones, but not banned. [1] Employees have no legal ability to remove someone for a ringing cell phone during the movie. I believe…
Against
- This is my first debate on debate. org, please teach me well! :)TOPIC:People should be allowed to have cell phones in public movie theaters. By "have", I mean have a cell phone in their possession that is turned on (i. e. can receive calls and/or texts), during the movie (from…
- ==Con Closing Statement==I will reply to my opponent's points and bring up the important issues in this debate.My opponent says that theater workers have the right to remove a distracting patron and links this to cell phones. However, in Regal Cinemas for example, guests are…
- 360.
Computers have come to dominate our lives
For
- Ah Nico, I hope that you have forfeited because my post helped you break free from computer domination. I imagine you skiing somewhere, cross country, without the aid of even a global positioning system. I hope you're having a glorious adventure.
- Nico1234, I misread this debate. I thought I was con and you were pro. My mistake. Had a rather tough day in the real world. Please ignore my previous post.My arguments start now.Unfortunately, computers really can dominate our lives. Computer addiction is a serious health…
Against
- It is true that clothes and simple necessities are not dominating, however, computers are not dominating because they're tools and us humans use this for research and shopping etc. How can a tool dominate? Although people are addicted, it is there fault for not acting and not…
- Are Computers Dominating us or are people letting themselves be dominated. The problem lies within the individual not the computer.
- 361.
Children under 12 should be allowed smartphones
For
- Adult's supervision may reduce the harm thats bring to children. I've lots of friends under 12 using smartphone, but none of them have health problems. The smartphone can bring lots of convienient and all the harmful can be prevented. To all the children under 12, if you have a…
- using whatsapp can save money and more convenient. Second, using smart phone can also contact others in a more comfier way. I think they won't want to call others in all time. Using the apps in smartphone can save time ,save money and more convienient
Against
- On Windows 8.1, there's an app for Viber, which also allows you to talk and text for free. Secondly, kids under the age of twelve don't need any apps or anything, there's no reason for them to have access to mind numbing games such as subway surfer or angry birds, they would…
- I accept. I think children under 12 should use smartphone , because they can contact with their parent by smart phone by dialling numbers or whatsapp.A smartphone is not required to call, for this, parents can provide their children with a simple flip phone. There have been…
- 362.
Moderators should prevent and sanction personal attacks
For
- -- Re: Rebuttal --R1. Con says that we have no reason to believe that Juggle intends to profit from this site. False. Juggle has referenced its "investment" in DDO. The word investment implies an expected (profitable) return so his point is negated. Then Con says Juggle might…
- -- Re: Rebuttals -- R1. We have every reason to believe that Juggle's intention is profit, and no reason to believe that it's not. Unless my opponent provides us with a better incentive, then for all intents and purposes, rational thinking requires us to presume that generating…
Against
- CounterargumentsR1. We have every reason to believe...harass and antagonize other people.C1. My opponent has not presented any reason to believe that "Juggle's intention is profit [regarding the website Debate-dot-org]." My opponents allegation that their "intention" with…
- RebuttalsR1. We have absolutely no idea what Juggle's intentions are.We did not join this site as shareholders or stakeholders in what we understand to be the conglomerate that owns it. Debate-dot-org is a proprietary Internet location (website), and accordingly, is…
- 363.
PlayStation 4 is better than Xbox One
For
- Xbox one has 720p graphics while the Ps4 has 1080 graphics, which means that Ps4 has smoother and crispier graphics and thus is better for next gen. And yes it is true that it has better multi-tasking, this is a good reason.Now to my points on why the ps4 is better:-1080…
- Pro: ps4 is the better console Con: Xbox is the better console My opponent will start the debate...
Against
- the Xbox or Xbox one to be more specific is a better console than the Ps4. one reason is it has extremely good graphics, and allows you to access internet for more than just your game you are playing.
- hmm
- 364.
Strong commitment to technological progress neglects other societal values
For
- Nothing left to say.
- Not much to work with, with 500 characters a round. Summary: Education is always right up there on the frontier of technology. So in no way does it neglect education. You'd have almost no chance of finding a technolgically advanced job without a college degree or some sort of…
Against
- yes it does. it progress cause a society to neglect other values, such as education and the protection of the environment.
- 365.
Avast is the best free antivirus program
For
- I love Avast its awesome to here the females voice that tells weather you have a infection. I am not that great with computers and technology but I am learning. Anybody else like or dislike Avast? If you hate it tell me what one you use and like.
- Norton isn't free.
Against
- Norton.
- But last night your mother was.
- 366.
Anonymous online accounts should be banned
For
- WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO TACKLE CYBERBULLYING? The opposition has stated that "By putting the power to halt the cyber bully's attacks in the victim's hands" will halt cyber bullying. That is the status quo, however when i pressed my argument it has been greatly misinterpreted.…
- My opponent plays down the danger of cyberbullying and says the current system deals with the serious threats however I want to defend the social outcasts, the people who don't get noticed. Now onto my substantive, I've defended the common people however now I need to protect…
Against
- I have outlined my round, so lets get right to it:Banning anonymous online accounts hurts "everyone". The simple fact of the matter is that we as a person demand a certain degree of privacy when we conduct transactions, whatever they may be. I don't want websites to know who I…
- Remaining anonymous has been a corner stone of this country. Our voting habits, shopping habits, and yes, personal opinion have all been given some degree of privacy. The ability to express oneself without fear of retaliation enables the press to do its job, as well as a…
- 367.
PCs are better than Macs
For
- Through my research, it shows you just typed in "Why mac is better than PC" to Google to get your source. http://www.google.com... No, "some people" saying Mac can run Windows faster does not make it faster. Windows was built for a windows based machine. The components are made…
- Alright. Well The reasons why I think PC is better than MAC. - Cost. Why pay so much for nothing more than a brand name? There's really no other way to phrase that. When you're talking about computers, you don't usually use the saying "you get what you pay for".. You can build…
Against
- MAC has a lot of pluses as well Viruses- People create more viruses for PCs than MACs. Macs can run windows natively and some say it is even faster http://www.makeuseof.com...
- please explain it to me.
- 368.
People under 18 should be banned from the internet
For
- I will commence my rebuttals. I will be doing a sentence-by sentence commentary. Rebuttal to Contention 1: The library is free, and encourages one to develop their searching skills. After their mind becomes dulled by simply being able to search online for anything, they will…
- In most debates a forfeit would mean automatic disqualification, however, I will overlook this and present my arguments. Due to the fact that my opponent used no references, I will assume it is okay for me to do the same. Contention 1: It Exposes Them to Explicit Material No…
Against
- Ok, sorry, I thought I added a rule about forfeiting twice in a row resulting in disqualification, but I must've overlooked. No matter how safe you try to keep a child, they will always see things not meant for young eyes on the internet. Only with a complete ban would it be…
- I would like to aplogize, as over this weekend I have been busy.Argument 1: Educational ValueRather than having to search libraries for information, students can now quickly search on the Internet for information in reports and projects making it more convenient. Books have to…
- 369.
E-books are better than printed books
For
- Thanks ----------------------------- Although you are right, you are missing something's . When you have an E-book you can underline and un underline in case you had a mistake you can even take notes and save them instead on writing on the book permanently, an other great thing…
- E-books v's Printed books I'm doing a debate at my school and I require some practice
Against
- I hope you do well in your schooling :) ----------------------------------------------------------- Printed books are more personal. (If you own the book, because damaging someone else's property is wrong) you can dog ear the book, underline words, hell you could rip the front…
- Well you have a very good point with the underlining and saving. It is also true you can have 40+ books, but what happens when that device gets broken/lost/stolen? It's true a book can be stolen, but I doubt someone would steal that many books. Also, what if you can't plug your…
- 370.
YouTube should be monitored
For
- I like your points. Since this is my first debate, I'll try to return to as many topics as I can. If children hear cursing on the Internet, they will start to experiment themselves. I do admit that my "friends only" plan would be an utter flop, but if absolutely necessary,…
- Well, once you get bad data in your head, it STAYS! I also can not prove anything, but take a look around! Is there a SINGLE misguided teen that has not looked up an inappropriate video on Youtube. And if they keep looking stuff up, they stay led only by videos posted by random…
Against
- "If anything, small children should go on Zuitube, one of the few websites that is kid-friendly and monitored." I agree, but Youtube should not have to deny millions of users good videos because of lack of parental control. "If children hear cursing on the Internet, they will…
- "I also can not prove anything"That's too bad, you need proof especially when you are the Instigator and Pro where you accept the Burden of Proof to prove Youtube somehow negatively influences children."Is there a SINGLE misguided teen that has not looked up an inappropriate…
- 371.
The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act should become law
For
- Inconclusive
- Well, I am impressed that there was a nil effort to refute the claims of invasion to privacy from the bill. :/
Against
- Forfeit, see comments... Sorry too busy this week...
- Simple debate/discussion regarding CISPA, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act.I am against it, I would like to hear why you are for it.3 rounds acceptancearguments/ talking pointsrebuttals/ closing statmentsJust want to know why some people think that this…
- 372.
Security cameras in public places are not an invasion of privacy
For
- If you put everybody under 18 in the US in a prison cell filled with security cameras and guards, that would be worse than a simple security camera. So that's irrelevant. What I'm talking about is a little camera in the corner of a store that keeps people from stealing stuff,…
- Security Cameras stop crimes and can identify dangerous criminals.
Against
- My opponent only brought two arguments to this debate which did not actually support his resolution. He stated that security cameras are not an invasion of privacy because: "Security Cameras stop crimes and can identify dangerous criminals. " These two contentions were not…
- Extend all of my arguments.
- 373.
Governments should have no power to regulate cyberspace
For
- The government of any country should not be able to limit anything being posted, or received from cyberspace, until they pay for the specific domain of the website. A. Regulating what people may see as well as say goes against human rights, and in the Unite States of America…
- Thank you for proving absolutely nothing.
Against
- My goal for this speech is to bring up my point to show you how in the real world, my side is more preferable than Pro's.In this debate it has been set up under the idea that there are two extremes, the first being that governments should have no power regarding content on…
- 374.
Surveillance technology sales to non-democracies should be banned
For
- The right of Western businesses to sell their services abroad can be curtailed when their actions stand counter to the interests of their home governments
- Advanced surveillance technology prevents dissidents from being able to organize and sue for freedom
Against
- The inability to use advanced technologies merely forces non-democracies to utilize more unsavoury methods to achieve their aims
- It is hypocritical for democratic governments to utilize surveillance technology to watch their own people while denying that technology to others
- 375.
Society should celebrate the rise of hacktivism
For
- I geuss I'm gonna have to elaborate on the 'basically the same thing' part. When I said 'they do basically the same thing in the end,' I meant it in that both hackers and hacktivists hack. But, as I hopefully got through in the same reply, they are motivated by different…
- You're coming short of an argument, and I think you're not using the correct term for what it is you're describing. There is a difference between a so called 'hacktivist,' and a normal hacker. You see, you're talking about groups such as Lizard Squad, who are hackers because…
Against
- So i'm against hacktivism while my opponent will defend why we celebrate the rise of hacktivism. I will dicuss why hactivism is not good while my opponent will dicuss the benifits of having hackers in our society. i'm against this because it could cause us more harm in our…
- So they basically do the same thing so it's still risky for us to celebrate hactivism because you will never have the assurance that they will use it for good not bad because at the end of the day we can never control how people decidebecause you never know he's motive change…
- 376.
Hacking can be ethically justified
For
- 5. Hacks to uncover or expose criminal activity, corruption or corporate malpractice
- Hacks as artistic expression.
Against
- Stealing and invading privacy is fundamentally wrong.
- What hacking is doing to the fundamental structure of the Internet...
- 377.
The NSA's bulk data mining should be restricted
For
- Thanks for the acceptance of my debate, and voters thanks for reading.Safety versus Certain PrivaciesI acknowledge that with the NSA doing its data mining, Americans and people abroad lose certain freedoms, privileges, or aspects to their lives, take whatever label you wish.…
- Full Resolution: Let's pretend we know for sure that the NSA's Data Mining is a useful tool in protecting America from attacks, both domestic and foreign. I will argue that the NSA's Data Mining should continue, my opponent should do otherwise.
Against
- Following my opponents instructions I will not have a first speech. I would like to say very nice topic though!
- Before I begin I will just organize my speech so the judges can follow along better. First I will be defending my case from my opponents attacks, second I will attack my opponents case. Lets begin. I'd like you to think of a hammer whose head is so big it'll mash your fingers…
- 378.
Large-scale cyberattacks should be treated as acts of war
For
- Cyber attacks are no different from traditional attacks
- Cyber attacks can do serious damage to the state
Against
- Definition of a large scale cyber attack is extremely vague
- Cyber attacks are often carried out by non-state actors
- 379.
Religious and atheist propaganda should face the same YouTube rules
For
- This isn't an argument about whether or not Atheism propaganda exists on Youtube, or even one about theists bashing atheists or vice versa. It's a matter of whether it should be banned if religious propaganda is banned. Trying to push people that there is a lack of God on…
- It requires critical thinking to believe in God and also to not believe in God. Either way is pushing it. You do agree that Atheism is lack of belief in God, do you not?
Against
- I agree, but I do not see atheists forcing their beliefs (or lack of) on YouTube, nor do I see them bashing others beliefs, and that's where the line was drawn on theists. The forcing. Atheists promote it, but theists force it and bash others on it, and the evidence lies on…
- Yes, atheism is the lack of belief in a god. I have watched many, many videos by or of atheists. None came out and said "stop believing in god". Only them disputing a claim by a theist, or explaining how something about science provides a better answer than "God did it".…
- 380.
The internet should face more government censorship
For
- But i would say,social media cause more harm than good.There are better communication plattform than social media.We can also communicate through skype,e-mail,what's app,line,text message,face time.It's much better than social media also it provide more security and privacy…
- Hi Dilara i invite you to a debate challenge.Here is the topic about internetship.It's not an punishment what i am trying to do.It's a safety.We should have more internet censorship because many crime occur through internet.
Against
- i agree with you that people should be as safe as they can be on the internet, but that doesn't mean ban social media,witch as of now is a great way to interact with people thousands of miles away and keep updated on world events. your much more likely to die in a car accident…
- i agree with you that people should be as safe as they can be on the internet, but that doesn't mean ban social media,witch as of now is a great way to interact with people thousands of miles away and keep updated on world events. your much more likely to die in a car accident…
- 381.
Western companies should be incentivised to build anonymity software for activists
For
- Incentives are the best way to produce effective, affordable software
- Anonymity software helps to guarantee protection for people involved in uprisings
Against
- Aiding of the agents of chaos will allow the government to discredit the uprisings as being instigated and abetted by the West
- Justice demands that those who seek actual political redress be sorted from opportunistic marauders
- 382.
Publishing software designed to access the darknet should be banned
For
- The full resolution is: "This House would ban the publication of software which is specifically designed to enable access to the darknet."Round one is for acceptance. No new arguments may be presented in the final round. Voters need a minimum 2k elo to vote.
- That was fast...
Against
- It makes sense that people should be allowed to freely distribute software which enables access to the darknet.
- 383.
Hacking should be considered a form of terrorism
For
- No matter how good the government computers are, there will always be an off chance of someone break in to their computers. The point of making hacking illegal would be a clear sign of deterrence, hopefully this would prevent people from not stealing government documents.…
- The fact that the government security is hackable, doesn't really give any reason to why we should not consider hacking a form of terrorism. If anything, it shows we need better people protecting our cyber systems. You are right to say that The Freedom of Information Act…
Against
- Hacking IS illegal. So I'm not sure what point you're trying to make exactly. The debate is to consider hacking as terrorism and to penalize it as such. Making things illegal does not stop criminals from doing so. There's no agreeing or disagreeing with a law (in some context).…
- P1) If government computers are hackable it shows flaws within our system. These flaws need to be improved. If we have computer spyware is supposed to prevent these attacks, then why are they still happening. It should not be easy to gain access to such private information. P2)…
- 384.
The United States should adopt internet censorship
For
- "This is a very confusing statement; I do not understand what you are stating. If you are saying that censoring the Internet puts people's rights in jeopardy - yes, it does. "Congress" only has the right to suspend the First Amendment if what it on the Internet is an…
- You sure do like the word if, and you never explain what rights are infringed.You also say "putting other people's rights in jeopardy is an infringement of their rights."Would me saying that we should censor the Internet put people's rights in jeopardy; therefore, infringing…
Against
- "Would me saying that we should censor the Internet put people's rights in jeopardy; therefore, infringing rights?" This is a very confusing statement; I do not understand what you are stating. If you are saying that censoring the Internet puts people's rights in jeopardy -…
- Clear and Present Danger. If a dangerous situation arises, and someone gets hurt, that would be a violation of their rights; therefore, in this case, the right can be suspended if someone's rights are infringed. Fighting words. Nobody has the right to start a fight or commit…
- 385.
Wikipedia should not remove images of Muhammad from his article
For
- I think it's obvious that I'm not talking about the quality of the images. Muslims believe it's disrespectful towards them to show ANY images of Muhammad.
- Perhaps my opponent is trolling, or simply doesn't understand what this debate is about. Is there any point trying to have a serious debate about the disgusting wishes of Islam ?
Against
- Np
- My opponent states the following: "Perhaps my opponent is trolling, or simply doesn't understand what this debate is about." My opponent's argument concerns the treatment of Islam by non-Muslims. I actually agree with him that Islam does not deserve special treatment.However,…
- 386.
The AK-47 is the best rifle ever made
For
- Con has once again forfeited their round of the debate.
- My opponent has forfeited their round.
Against
- I say no its not the best gun.If u play counter strike you would know.lets start debating.All the best to my oponent,let this be a friendly debate
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?