Discussly

Science Debate Topics — page 22

1,338 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 22 of 27
  1. 1051.

    Creationism and intelligent design advocates are necessarily liars

    For

    • You don't know what a theist believes, do you? Okay, from now on, I will use "Creationist" as opposed to the word "Theist", although they have the exact definition by your word. I just found "theist" faster to type. I believe the word CREATIONIST is mentioned in the title of…
    • "Nowhere can you find that belief in every word of the Bible is necessary for being a theist. "Ah, but what about CREATIONISTS? What words are necessary in their religious views in order for them to prefer the idea of a creator over naturalistic influences? You keep tapdancing…

    Against

    • I would like to point out that my opponent has 1) ignored my main points in regards to fighting his stance, and 2) taken my quotes completely and utterly out of context, either by choice or ignorance. I will address these further on.Creationism at it's core is a belief in a…
    • "First of all, we don't have a series of Hindu creationists and other mythological religions (Greek, Viking, etc) pounding on the doors of our educational institutions and insisting on "equal time" for creation-science."This paragraph doesn't refute any of my points, nor does…
  2. 1052.

    Sexuality is not a choice

    For

    • I believe that sexuality is not a choice, but I'll let my opponent have the first statement.
    • "You've informed me it's determined at birth, but you also say it takes one a while to began to realize who they are." This is silly statement. One does not normally realise their sexuality immediately. It's set in stone at birth, but it may take a while to figure it out. Thank…

    Against

    • Please Note: I'm NOT attempting to offend anyone, nor am I against those who are other than heterosexual. I wish the best of luck to me and my opponent. Sexuality in my honest opinion isn't wired into one's brain at a very young age, nor do I believe one is automatically…
    • My statement is silly? Bravo. Give it up. Sexuality is a choice. One feels a certain way in their life at one point then all of a sudden "figures" themselves out. You went from having a sexual orientation to being "asexual" whatever that means which is a change by choice. One…
  3. 1053.

    Human extinction is not possible after nuclear war

    For

    • Let's get this party started then. 1) Definitions Possible: "that may or can be, exist, happen, be done, be used, etc."[1] Human race: "all of the living human inhabitants of the earth"[2] Extinct: "no longer in existence; that has ended or died out"[3] After: "later in time…
    • Clarification: Pro: must say why it is NOT possible for the human race to become extinct after a nuclear war Con: must say why it is possible for the human race to become extinct after a nuclear war Good luck to my opponent.

    Against

    • Yes.
    • No. Your first argument is silly. You calculate how many Tsar Bombas would need to be detonated in order to cover the Earth. You are using the total surface area of the Earth, which includes oceans, lakes, rivers, and other bodies of water in which human life does not exist.…
  4. 1054.

    Evolution is not an accurate account of life's origins

    For

    • I'd like to say evolution isn't true because its based on religion and not on science. Weve never seen a monkey become a guy...
    • Wtf? YOU said that we are monkeys!?!?!? WHICH IS IT!?!?!?

    Against

    • Extend
    • Humans are a type of ape. All modern day apes have a common ancestor. Simple as that.
  5. 1055.

    Genetics explains differences in average intelligence between racial groups

    For

    • I will now counter my opponent's points. 1st: This is an irrelevant point in my view. Con needs to explain why this would be relevant for this to be a point. , 2nd: No evidence to support claims. I don't believe that this is true. .. .. But, if am wrong, I need evidence to…
    • I argue that: 1.) IQ Measures a Substantially Heritable trait in the United States 2.) Different Populations that Are Typically Called Races Have Different Average IQs 3.) There is a Signigicant Genetic Component to the Different Average IQs betwen Races in the United States…

    Against

    • Well, for 1, there is evidence for both sides, making it nearly impossible to bring up a point without it having a counter-point. The example I gave was points used for non-heredity, however it can be pointed out that just as many are challenged, making it moot. Because of…
    • Hello, and thank you for creating this topic of discussion, and now let us commence. 1st: Well...this is an highly disputed topic for something with so little evidence, but it has been shown multiple times that a mentally challenged (retarded) parent or parents have had…
  6. 1056.

    Accepting evolution is incompatible with religious belief

    For

    • I very pleased that you went though some time to explain it. I'm very sorry about this incident. Perhaps you could have explained how each round would work out. I was just parsing my oppoment's rebuttal. I could have asked you to clarify your reasoning and condense your theory,…
    • I would like to congratulate my opponent for being very specific on what evolution is. If he would had posted this earlier it would have given be an A+ on a science research assignment. My opponent seems to know much about evolution and athieism. First I would like to attack my…

    Against

    • Originally Offered to "Nobody", he failed to accept. Despite common claims that evolution is simply preaching atheism, this is not the case. Evolution is a well established and evidenced theory which explains the progression, form, organization, and distribution of all the life…
    • You sir, are quite dishonest. Evolution can't be a part of atheism because atheism has no parts. I went to a lot of trouble to explain evolution and exactly how and why it works and the obvious facts that it doesn't share any relationship with atheism which simply exists as a…
  7. 1057.

    Human embryos should be used for stem cell research

    For

    • Onto the next round. Id like to hear what my opponent has to say.
    • During the time an abortion can be performed its not a baby. Just because you think its wrong doesnt mean it is wrong. Osama bin laden though blowing up the World Trade Center was right. just because he thought it was right doesnt mean that it was. If anything it was a horrible…

    Against

    • First of all it will become a baby and abortion is still wrong i think.
    • So you are saying that we should kill human beings just to learn about cells. I don't think so. Killing an innocent human is wrong and of course ill play by your rules.
  8. 1058.

    Thermite is a reasonable explanation for carbon nanotubes in WTC dust

    For

    • While Thermite is a reasonable explanation for the presence fo carbon nanotubes in the wtc dust it could be possible due to other causes and was never claimed by the truth movement as proof of thermite. Unreacted nanothermite was discovered with sol gel matrix which could…
    • Thermite is a reasonable explanation for the presence fo carbon nanotubes in the wtc dust.

    Against

    • Back to the debate, my opponent asserts that carbon nanotubes (CNTs) found in the world trade center (WTC) debris is reasonable evidence for the use of thermite. Or to put it in another way that the twin towers were brought down using controlled explosions using thermite. My…
    • Thanks Truther :)
  9. 1059.

    Homosexual behavior in animals is natural

    For

    • There are there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that are actually gay. For example. Male dolphins often break away from the females to engage in all-male orgies, apparently for fun. There are plenty of females around, yet they still engage in this, as do other sea…

    Against

    • Pro never cited his sources for his claims, so they are most likely false, and even if they were true, the burden of proof is on him to prove these claims, not me. So seeing as though his burden of proof has not been fulfilled, his argument is actually not an argument as it has…
    • Let's overview this debate shall we?
  10. 1060.

    On balance, noetic science can be accurately used to prove the existence of God

    For

    • Pass.I would still like to hear comments about the debate and there be votes, but just be sure that they are tied.
    • I would like to send out a note to my opponent that the debate is not about whether or not God exists or not, but is about whether or not Noetic science can be used to prove his existance. With this being the case my opponent's last round was unTopical and since there was a…

    Against

    • Vote neutral!
    • Tie. Do not vote
  11. 1061.

    Evolution is more rational than creationism

    For

    • Thanks to my opponent for a relevant and on topic debate. So many of these creationism/evolution debates wander all over the place and I am extremely pleased we did what we set out to do.In your opening statement in round three you set out the argument against evolution as not…
    • I thank my opponent for an interesting argument for the existence of a god, however this argument is flawed. In this round I will show my opponent why the quantum argument for the existence of God is flawed.The Young's double slit experiment is a very important experiment,…

    Against

    • Hi Pro Pro's Contention My opponent's objection is that the collapse of the wave-function "does not mean the wave part of the duality disappears it still has to be present otherwise all our molecules loose intrinsic properties." And I absolutely agree with this. However, I do…
    • Hi Pro! I think that first, I will state that I am not going to deny the evidence that Pro presented for evolution. Rather, I will deny the reasoning used - reasoning which I believe to be self-refuting, illogical, and ultimately unreasonable. In that way, Creationism will…
  12. 1062.

    Measured intelligence differences exist between human racial groups

    For

    • Despite that fact that my opponent has apparently forfeited round 2, I will continue to argue for my side of this debate. I established in the first round that there was a difference between brain size among the human races, now I will establish that brain size correlates with…
    • Out of curiosity, why do you consider my side immoral? Of course a whale has a bigger brain than a human, but you have based your argument on a flawed logic. For you cannot compare the 2 brains, anatomically speaking the human brain is the most complex brain of all animals, it…

    Against

    • I apologize for forfeiting my last round, unfortunately I have been rather busy and probably should never have taken this debate on in the first place. Besides, I don't really know what I'm talking about. For now, I concede the debate, everyone should vote for my opponent -…
    • I will not even check your statistics, I will accept at face value your claim that black people have smaller brains – because very simply brain size has little to do with intelligence. The largest brain in the animal kingdom belongs to the sperm whale, at an average of about…
  13. 1063.

    Intelligent design is a product of religion, not science

    For

    • Just because at a given point in time, a particular view was not unreasonable does not make that view scientific nor a product of science. It was not unreasonable to assume, say 4-500 years ago, that the earth was the center of the solar system. Like you say, it certainly looks…
    • Wow, I was expecting lines of copy-pasted creationist propaganda. How refreshing to see someone actually taking on the debate. Thank you. Now, correct me if I am mistaken but it seems to me that at the core of your argument is the contention that initially, the concept of…

    Against

    • The reason the idea of Intelligent Design was scientific is because it was a reasonable conclusion when the real answer was unknown. I don't know what caused the expansion of the universe but claiming it was goblins is unneeded and moreover completely worthless and doesn't give…
    • Intelligent design was for a large number of years the respected and the overwhelmingly accepted theory as to the origins of life. Even prior to Paley there were overwhelmingly compelling arguments as to why life should be seen as the product of an intelligence. This view…
  14. 1064.

    The God hypothesis is a scientifically supported theory

    For

    • OMNI-PRESENT, ETERNAL, AND IMMATERIAL The Law of Cause and Effect states that for every effect there must be a cause for it. In addition, The Law of Biogenesis, attributed to Louis Pasteur, states that life (life as we know it) arises from pre-existing life, not from nonliving…
    • ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS let me explain the data based on the results. With a simple thought, this personal absolute mind must have freely created and manifested itself in reality with the intention of having a relationship with its human creation. This would explain why we…

    Against

    • I accept. Will I be posting rebuttals in round 2 or just arguments for why the god hypothesis is not a supported scientific theory?
  15. 1065.

    Creation has more evidence for it than evolution does

    For

    • unsupported? do you know about the ICR at all?they back what they say. contact them. okay, I guess you want more links about the Dino's. http://www.lightningshock.com... this one is more explanatory than Prof :) http://sunandshield.blogspot.com... http://www.infobarrel.com...…
    • I need to give a little info about the beginning of the argument. on the last debate I was shoot down so to speak by saying that Dino's existed. everyone said, "so what". so this is so what. evolution puts Dino's at the bottom of the geological column, in the Jurassic age. if…

    Against

    • Yes, the ICR is a creationist website that is based upon A-priori belief in god. Instead of basing their "theories" on evidence they base the evidence upon their previously held beliefs, and anything to the contrary is ignored or dropped. Why should I contact them? You do…
    • I would like to point out that this was supposed to be a debate between me and pro, not a debate between me and unsupported Creationist websites. My problem with your claim that "Dino's" currently exist is not that it is irrelevant but that it is completely unsupported and is…
  16. 1066.

    Should babies be engineered in the womb for cosmetic reasons

    For

    • On the if you can fix it why wouldn't you) I think that if the deformity is not going to create a major impact on the persons life why waste the money on fixing it. This argument comes back to the decision of the parents. If the parents decide that they want spend the money to…
    • money can't buy you happiness. (But I'd still like to try) You say that pleasure is linked to money, so would you say that money is what gives people value. I could take it a step further and say that this link would diminish the value of poor people. On the physical problems,…

    Against

    • I never said that money gives you your value I only said that it gives you pleasure. your value is still intrinsic so the value of the poor is still the same as the rich the poor just may not get the same pleasures as the rich. (On the if you can fix it why wouldn't you) I…
    • i don't agree that people who are better looking have a better live. The thing that can give you pleasure assuming having a good life is having pleasure is money. The way you make money is by getting a job and there has been research done that said looks don't give you high…
  17. 1067.

    There is scientific evidence supporting creationism

    For

    • Thanks for the response. I'll use more of Dr. Humphreys' article in this response. 1. Galaxies wind themselves up too fast Evolutionists call this "the winding-up dilemma," which they have known about for over fifty years. They have devised many theories to try to explain it,…
    • If you've ever been on a jury or visited a courtroom, you've seen that evidence is always presented by someone testifying. Someone must testify as to what it is, where it came from, and their judgment as to what it signifies. The same is true of evidence in science, too: it is…

    Against

    • 1) So, in essence you just gave up for this point. You have no refutation to offer, you have no objection, you just say that it fails because you say so and that's that. Hint: That's not how debating works mate. Also, "evolutionist" is a silly term; and it doesn't even make…
    • To keep matters as brief as I possibly can, I'll just focus on the meat of your comment. 1) This is a creationist claim which is often brought up. Spiral arms can develop whenever and this is vindicated by computer simulations. Source: (. https://books.google.com.au...). 2) We…
  18. 1068.

    Intelligent design is the best explanation for life's origin

    For

    • I want to extend my sincere appreciation to Orangatang for accepting my invitation to join me in exploring this fundamentally important question. It is my prayer that this exchange will bear fruit toward an understanding of what is really true for all who participate in and…
    • this is a shared burden of proof debate. I will be arguing in favor of the proposition. Taking the position that intelligent agency is not the best explanation for the origin of life in this universe, con's burden of proof will be to offer a better explanation.

    Against

    • I appreciate joepalcsak for his remarks towards embracing the truth rather than protecting a worldview. However, it seems we have a very different methodology for discovering these truths. I will support my case below with rigorous scientific studies based on solid evidence (as…
    • I Accept!
  19. 1069.

    Believing in evolution does not require atheism

    For

    • Thank you for this debate opportunity. It was great.
    • "God's establishment of this process and unwillingness to intercede in it amounts to God developing a pre-conceived plan..." However, these evolutionist creationists don't think that God just let evolution happen. They claim that God actually created the mutations in DNA. God…

    Against

    • Yeah, what he said. XD
    • Well, searches for evolutionist creationism haven't yielded much information. Those few sites I have been able to view seem to operate under the deist concept of a pre-organized world. http://www.ualberta.ca... http://en.wikipedia.org... The first site admits that evolutionary…
  20. 1070.

    The Earth is about 6,000 years old

    For

    • I'm glad to hear back from you and thank you for taking the time to debate the topic with me. This is a topic that normally causes people to get upset and start chastising their opponent. I assure you I'm not one of those people. I want people to know that God's word stands…
    • I believe the Bible is 100% accurate and that it tells us through lineages that the earth is around 6,000 years old. Science backs the Bible up 100% of the time and when there seems to be a contradiction between the two there is a misinterpretation of the facts. I stand by my…

    Against

    • My apologies for making you wait so long for my opening response. I hurriedly snatched up this topic before I had the time to properly write back. For your theory, I only ask that you provide evidence to your claims, as I seem to have nothing to work with as of right now. :)…
    • Well, hopefully you just forgot to check back in time, like I did with my last debate. It is as if you have robbed from me the last chapter of a good book. With that being said, voters: there is no reason whatsoever to vote PRO in this debate. While I have brought forth two…
  21. 1071.

    Evolution is incompatible with the existence of God

    For

    • Good day Debate.org community. I will start by providing the definitions of evolution and God before I initially start the debate with my contender. Evolution: the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the…

    Against

    • Um... OK.I will be arguing the Humans may have not been evolved. Some cases I can provide for this are: - Artifacts that prove human intelligence dating before Humans supposedly evolved.- Human Foot Prints in the same soil timeline as Dinosaurs!- And some flaws in…
    • Hello! Alright so I am Con to this topic, however, I will not be trying to disprove God, however, I am Con to Evolution being the "only way to go". I actually believe that when it comes to God he shouldn't be locked down by man-made theories and broken scientific laws. I am not…
  22. 1072.

    Science disproves the core claims of religion

    For

    • Ahhhh another "Evidentialist". Definitely a step forward for Christianity, instead of basing their opinions completely on faith they are wangling evidence to try and support Christianity. Firstly I will start by asking you about how you would interpret this quote from the…
    • I would like to start by recommending that you stop referring to yourself as a Christian. For the definition of Christianity is this "Christianity is a monotheistic and Abrahamic religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ as presented in canonical gospels and…

    Against

    • It seems that my opponent has forfeited the last round after being challenged to actually debate rather than, to quote him, "wangling evidence" to support his claims. He has produced absolutely no evidence to support his claim and has not even attempted to counter my rebuttals.…
    • I'd like to begin by pointing out that this is a debate. As you'll recall from my first statement I said that the previous round was for arguments for your point of view. Your complete ignorance of this fact and the inability to produce any arguments to support your side just…
  23. 1073.

    Genetic enhancement of human embryos should be permitted

    For

    • Think of it this way. Human enhancement is technically already being used by simple every day drugs that either help people sleep more, keep them more energized, et ceterra. You say that this would make athletes have great ability without any hard work, yet, that is the gene…
    • That is a simple religious stand point. You claim that mutations can still occur because of the saying, "Let nature take it's course," even though it is not phrases that affect science, but it is science and reality that created phrases. Either way, it is true that there can be…

    Against

    • Yes even if it helps improve life for those designer babies and that not everyone could afford it, but the majority of the people will most likely have this option done. Also if the human lifespan was increased the Earth's population would increase tremulously to where there…
    • Human enhancement is an attempt to temporarily or permanently overcome the current limitations of the human body. This is bad because it limits the amount of genetic diversity by improving athletes ability without out any hard work and will start off a steroid's arms race…
  24. 1074.

    Homosexuality is psychological rather than biological

    For

    • Again, thanks for your contribution. In the interests of clarity and ease, both for myself and the readers, perhaps when you make an affirmative claim you might wish to quote what you feel is the key portion from a website or study, rather than merely several links to various.…
    • Thank you for your opening gambit. You said; "An evolutionary basis or incentive for homosexuality to exist is not necessary for it to be (at least partly) biological in nature." While that may be technically true, it does not prove or show that homosexuality is biological or…

    Against

    • "While that may be technically true, it does not prove or show that homosexuality is biological or genetically driven."Purpose of the quoted statement wasn't an attempt to definitely prove that homosexuality has a genetic basis - merely that the lack of an apparent evolutionary…
    • "There is no firm biological basis to homosexuality"Incorrect (1 - 4)."I do not believe there is any evolutionary basis to homosexuality in mankind,"An evolutionary basis or incentive for homosexuality to exist is not necessary for it to be (at least partly) biological in…
  25. 1075.

    Genetics influence whether someone is religious

    For

    • Peaches
    • Pickles

    Against

    • Oh no you don't - celery.
    • (ajr18 and LuckyLemon have agreed to keep this a 3-Round debate)
  26. 1076.

    Humans should be created using intelligent design principles

    For

    • Let's see if the sociopath psychopath Con who has no genuine friends or loved one which are all in itself phenomenally SCREAMING red flags, can hang out WITHOUT inventing excuses and or flat out lying during this debate? He also has a 15% appalling rating on The Big Issues…
    • Taken from - https://rationalwiki.org...* Not designing the human body the way he wants it by having all human males born circumcised like Shem.* Physical birth defects.* Making our adrenal glands too big.* Aging, which is quite literally caused by a biological error in cells.*…

    Against

    • I thank the instigator for posting this debate. I look forward to a civilized, enlightened discussion and a lively debate. I will demonstrate that the imperfections with which mankind is afflicted is not evidence of a lack of intelligent design by the Creator. Also, I will…
    • Pro in Round #3, argues that Con: "...has a 0% clue as to what the topic is about and thus cannot respond properly, gets a 15% rating on his profile on The Biggest issues,..." Con had hoped that Pro had more in his arsenal than this, as it was he who instigated this debate…
  27. 1077.

    The God hypothesis is a valid scientific theory

    For

    • Alternative Hypothesis When I said that the personal absolute mind created other human minds I was talking about the law of biogenisis and possibly the theory of information. It makes no difference because the mere fact that this being created life in the first place is…
    • ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS Nevertheless, let me explain the data based on the results. With a simple thought, this personal absolute mind must have freely created and manifested itself in reality with the intention of having a relationship with its human creation. This would…

    Against

    • Here we are in the final round. I hesitate to say too much as my opponent will not have the chance to refute my arguments. Regardless, at this point in the debate, the real objective is to be using the standards set up at the beginning of the debate to judge the resolution. At…
    • Before I begin my arguments for this round, I would like to point out an overall trend that I see in my opponent's arguments. He has made a number of unwarranted jumps in logic. Throughout this round I will point out examples of this. Alternative HypothesisFirst, I do not…
  28. 1078.

    Homosexuality is not a natural orientation

    For

    • I specifically used the 2nd definition and not the 1st one because this debate isn't about about whether homosexuality has been created by man or by nature, it is about whether if, it was meant to be created and exists for natural reasons or is an anomaly occuring in…
    • The law of gender governs all creation. This law states that in order for something to exist it must have unity with male and female[1]. This is the law of gender and it governs all creation. The primary purpose of gender is reproduction. In order for something to exist and…

    Against

    • Judges note: I believe the sources used by opponent SHOULD BE CHECKED as they are not credible. His concept of law of gender is an opinion and not backed by science or facts, the page was so substandard it has been removed from wikipedia and the site where he has picked this…
    • More than 1,500 animal species engage in homosexual acts. "We"re talking about everything from mammals to crabs. The actual number is of course much higher. Among few animals homosexual behavior is rare, some having sex with the same gender only a part of their life, in the…
  29. 1079.

    Human enhancement such as designer babies should be permitted

    For

    • Human enhancement projects help thousands, if not millions of people to live better. A really good example could include burned victims. Burned victims are pointed at by little children and are embarrassed every time they leave the house. Imagine how that would feel, to be…
    • Human enhancement refers to any attempt to temporally or permanently overcome the current limitations of the human body through natural or artificial. People have a chose of whether or not they want to do that with their bodies. Basically, if the want to change how they look or…

    Against

    • yes, human enhancement is capable of treating disease. Is it always affective? According to ASRM, only 24% of the time is this successful;. we are here to gather the facts, not your opinion. yes it is their body, yes they should have the right to choose. But no woman should…
    • Hitler never made the mother uncomfortable, because blue eyed toe heads often survived and unidnetical family did not. I understand that enhancments can improve lives, but at the cost of what? Designer babies are often created(regent) as matches for sick family members. As seen…
  30. 1080.

    Sexual orientation is shaped more by nurture than nature

    For

    • Pro, So you are saying homosexuality is socially constructed. I disagree with you, my friend. If you research the developments in genetics, neuroscience, and cognitive psychology, this confirms that sexuality is indeed mostly a matter of nature. According to Stephen Jay Gould…
    • Since when being gay is a luxury and a choice? some of us were born gay. I am a believer that being is human nature. Me and my friends identify as gay don't find any type of luxury in being gay. I don't think anyone in this world find any type of luxury in themselves.

    Against

    • You've reiterated the fact that you were born gay, however you have no evidence to back up this claim. Due to the fact that there is no evidence to support this claim. The idea of blindly nurturing nature without proof that it really is nature is a dangerous move in the long…
    • You see the idea that homosexuality is product of nature is a little silly. If we look at history we see that it's more a product of luxury and choice. Anytime an empire or country has grown so successful that it no longer has to depend on mom and dad having children to go work…
  31. 1081.

    Genetic engineering should be widely used

    For

    • Genetic engineering should be used because it prevent disabilities. Approximately four million children are born each year with a serious genetic disorder. That is six percent of children born each year. This could all be prevented though through gene engineering, no parents…

    Against

    • In my first argument I exausted most of my knowledge of genetic engineering so I will just say that I would much rather live in a world that people with genetic diseases were helped to have a better quality of life instead of being changed so parts of them would never exist but…
    • Genetic engineering is wrong because Ithink means artificialy changing geans in organisms. Most Christians, like me belive that we were put on earth to maintain the planet. I do not think that gm is playing god although that could be an argument against it. However I do belive…
  32. 1082.

    Christianity and evolution are fundamentally incompatible

    For

    • First of all, prove the bible has changed Second, if you don't believe in the big bang then you must believe in a creator therefore you can not believe in complete evolution. The miracles that I have witnessed are many that to you may not be but that's because you don't look at…
    • Yes actually I have seen some miracles that the only explanation is God and to you they may not be but you have to look at stuff different ways and the bible talks about Jesus performing miracles on Earth and Jesus is God. Now The bible has not changed they have just made…

    Against

    • You want proof it changed? This should explain it http://www.nola.com... 2. I don't have to believe in the big bang or a creator to believe in evolution. I believe there was a different beginning. What logic is that? Einstein didn't believe in the big bang…
    • Bible hasn't changed? It has changed! Also I don't believe in the big bang. Also what miracles have you witnessed? A child being born? And Natural selection is a big part of evolution. Are you hearing this, my opponent agrees with natural selection!
  33. 1083.

    Genetic differences explain differences between racial groups

    For

    • Would Adolf Hitler be considered a black man in the USA's country because of the one drop rule? Obama is considered black in America / across the world
    • http://atlantablackstar.com... Look up Rashida Jones and Melissa Gorga. Goodbye I won the debate.

    Against

    • If you're implying that Hitler would have been considered black had he lived in the U.S, then no. There are simply too many aesthetic differences. If say, in a parallel universe, Hitler lived in the U.S during the same time that he invaded Czechoslovakia, he would still have…
  34. 1084.

    Homosexuality is primarily determined by genetics

    For

    • An examination of family pedigrees revealed that gay men had more homosexual male relatives through maternal than through paternal lineages, suggesting a linkage to the X chromosome. Dean Hamer24 found such an association at region Xq28. If male sexual orientation was…
    • My opponents arguements consisted of two points:Where does the gay gene come from?conversion therapy is an option.rebuttal of the first point:Although research for a gay gene has been in mainly small animals (worms, fruit flies, etc.)I understand that studies with animals not…

    Against

    • My opponent has not made any separate points, therefore, no rebuttals from me. My conclusion: APA states: "There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has…
    • Let's begin. Before I start my main points, think about this: Where did that gene come from? It sure wasn't your parents, they're obviously not homosexual, they had you, didn't they? Well maybe it was your grandparents? Most traits and DNA make-up skip a generation, right? But,…
  35. 1085.

    Race is a biological concept rather than a social one

    For

    • Thank you Danielle, for participating. I do not agree that the differences in races are minor and do not have a major impact whatsoever. At this point, the whole debate depends on our definition of 'minor'. How do you explain the difference in IQ levels and test scores averages…
    • 1st round will just a brief summary of my opponent and I's view on said topic. Sources, expansions will be brought in round 2 and rebuttals will be commence in round 3. Recently, in the past 30 years or so, we Americans have had an uncanny obsession with equalizing everything,…

    Against

    • Thanks, Pro. I'd like to commend you on a decent first round. My first debate was on annoying TV commercials, so even though you are wrong in this debate, I'm impressed by your first submission. I'll begin by repeating how biologists distinguish race. Race is a methodological…
    • I'd also like to state that Pro is factually incorrect. That is not a matter of opinion; it's a scientific truth. My opponent writes, "To this day, there is a stark difference between the races of America, and we intentionally block it out and deny it on the basis of 'racism is…
  36. 1086.

    Accepting evolution requires rejecting religious belief

    For

    • The theory of evolution does not say anything about the exsistance of God; you are correct. However, it detracts from the idea that God created each individual creature. I would also like to say that the fossil records do not support the theroy of evolution. There might be many…
    • While I will agree Atheism has been around far longer than the theory of evolution I will not agree that they don't go hand in hand. The theory of evolution basically states that there is no God, and the followers of Atheism do not believe in God. So let me ask you two…

    Against

    • It is certainly true that providing a mechanism for how live arose on this planet does very directly allow one to consider the possibility that life arose on this planet via that mechanism. However, it doesn't seem to be even remotely relevant to the question. One need not…
    • The theory of evolution has nothing to say about the existence of God. Atheists existed before Darwin's theory of evolution, not because of it. Atheism includes no belief at all, it simply consists of not believing in God. In a very real sense, babies are atheists. They don't…
  37. 1087.

    The God hypothesis should be considered a scientific theory

    For

    • 1. "Obviously, I disagree, and I am fairly certain that many readers will, as well." I finally am to see what CON is actually trying to do. He thinks he can win the debate by technicality rather than in spirit by dealing with my arguments directly (mainly because he can't…
    • What CON is babbling about (regarding gods and godesses from different religions) is nonsense and completely off topic. He is in a sense just attacking a strawmen. I acknowledge that the reason why someone is fundamentally an atheist or christian is based on the religious…

    Against

    • I want to offer many thanks to my partner for having instigated this challenge, and for his final presentation. I also want to acknowledge any readers who might have followed the debate to this point. FalsifiabilityIn studying the previous argument, and preparing for my own…
    • I welcome the latest installment of this debate by my partner. To say the least I was curious as to what form it might have taken. I feel, this round, that I can best continue my challenge of his premise by offering a few rebuttals. "What CON is babbling about (regarding gods…
  38. 1088.

    Intellectual differences exist between racial groups

    For

    • I hope we can finish in an intellectual manner. I am glad that you accept my definition of a Jew. I will start my argument with the fact that the Jewish people, while only consisting of 0.5% of the population of the world are responsible for 25% of nobel prizes, 25% of turing…
    • Due to the fact I am making a very controversial and politically incorrect argument, I want to first state that my argument is primarily based on the fact I have done research on both sides of the story and I feel that the evidence is overwhelmingly one sided. I hope that…

    Against

    • This is an interesting and controversial topic and while many others might be prone to approach this subject emotionally, I fully agree with the opponent's proposition that this topic should be combatted in a logical, reasonable manner. I would like to acknowledge that the…
    • It is so unfortunate that these last few rounds have gone undebated. This was such an interesting topic and it seemed that neither me nor my opponent had time to truly combat the issues at hand. Regardless, I believe my point stands. There is no true scientific way to connect…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.