Discussly

Religion Debate Topics — page 43

3,675 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 43 of 74
  1. 2101.

    The Bible should not be used as moral guidance

    For

    • Touch�. Morals are in modern society understood to be a concept held by people on whether certain actions are good or bad, by the way they affect society. Therefore, if the actions I have pointed out above can be shown to negatively affect people or society, I can prove that…
    • a) For the following debate, the New King James Version is to be used. b) No holds barred, nothing off limits. c) Please look to this flowchart to see how a religious debate, or any debate, should operate: http://blog.case.edu... It is of my opinion that the Judeo-Christian…

    Against

    • It is a shame my opponent was unable to post a response in the last round. I suppose all that is left is to do is for me to extend my refutation.
    • ===Opponent's definition of morality===My opponent has done a very good job of showing that many of the actions prescribed in the Bible do go against his own definition of what is moral and what is not. However, my opponent has completely failed to actually defend this…
  2. 2102.

    God predestines who will be saved

    For

    • Alright, again, another well thought out response. I will attempt to respond to it all. The first definition of Calvinism that you gave, you gave by saying, "You have no choice, if you're gong to be saved you can't resist and if you're going to hell there is no hope, you have…
    • Okay, thank you for your well thought out response. Your concerns with Calvinism I believe come from a good heart, but, as your probably assumed, I think they are wrong. You said a lot in your response. However, as I was reading it, I seen two major themes in your response: 1.…

    Against

    • Hi again! Unfortunately I've been busy and I apologize for my lag time in responding. This may be my last chance for response before time runs out so in case this is it for me I'm going to go a little different direction I hope you don't mind. Calvinism, Arminianism, Molinism,…
    • Thanks for your response. I want to make the point again that I hope you don't take anything I say as a personal attack or even an attack against Calvinism. Also that I'm not a "Molinist" I just personally find it to be a better fit. I think for the most part you and I believe…
  3. 2103.

    Men should be God's best friend

    For

    • I was raised as a Latter Day Saint, more commonly called Mormons. People of that faith believe that life is a test of faith and devotion. When a person takes a leap of faith, such as paying a tithe to church, they show their willingness to do as God wills. The validity of faith…
    • Thank you for debating this topic. While we as mere mortals cannot know the intentions of an unseen or misunderstood master, we have little option but to put our trust in such a being if he or she exists. Your analogy of a dog and its master is quite correct, if I had a dog…

    Against

    • A dog can see, smell and interact in real time with his master but man cannot do that with a god (assuming such things as deities exist). Furthermore, there are so many gods to choose from and which god you end up worshiping much depends on where and when (in terms of human…
    • A dog is a man's best friend. That's true, and not surprising if you think about it. After all, you provide him with food, shelter and entertainment in the form of toys and walkies - you even stroke him! In short, you give him everything he needs to make his life happy and…
  4. 2104.

    A Christian God exists

    For

    • The facts of this debate are simple: Pro did not offer an argument, only a link. I did offer an argument and fully supported every premise. My opponent says he refuted my argument, when in fact, he didn't offer any rebuttal whatsoever. Given the facts, I think the voters are…
    • My opponent does not seem interested in actual debate. He hopes he can win by pasting website links in lieu of any exposition on his part. I, on the other hand, laid out my argument in full. Sure, it's based on the Kalam Cosmological Argument, but it's my words. So, my opponent…

    Against

    • My opponent still fails to produce arguments directly showing that a God exists, and even if my arguments are based off of someone else's, just like his, he still fails to refute them. I believe I have won this debate due to the original failure of refuting any of my original…
    • Although I do appreciate PROS arguments, I agreed to debate KRfournier, Not KalamPRO does not prove God, he simply states facts of the universe without proving God had a part in it.Con also has failed to rebuttal against any of my arguments, he claims he should not have to…
  5. 2105.

    Religious belief benefits society more than atheism

    For

    • Plain and simple, yet again! Society can do wonders if it didn't have the religious community holding US back! Christians still don't want stem cell research to go through! Who would you rather live; a few day old embryo or a 30 year old man or woman who is dying who could…
    • Atheism doesn't require belief. I could say I do but I really wouldn't mean it unless there was truth behind it. If one says to me that he or she is telling the truth and there is EVIDENCE that he is; I'd then believe him or her. If it is a belief that requires me to have faith…

    Against

    • My opponent's closing statement is that because Christians are opposed to embryonic stem cell research that this proves the entirety of Theism to be inferior to atheism as a fundamental system on which society can rely. History has disproved him with the USSR and Communist…
    • Pro contradicts himself by stating that he would believe someone based on supposed evidence despite having just said that his viewpoint requires no belief.Pro states that there is no physical evidence for God, yet this is irrelevant to whether a society thrives better with…
  6. 2106.

    The Bible is not the word of God

    For

    • People who desire power corrupted the teachings of christianity only slightly... enough for them to gain power. the idea of christianity is good in theory but just like communism can be easily corrupted. my argument is that the cannon did not exist during the apocolistic age…
    • Ok, i do feel that the original writings may have been well intentioned but, we do not have the originals. what was there to stop the creators of the cannon, not the writings themselves, to change the wording, one example is the way women are treated in the bible. evidence…

    Against

    • The bible doesn't teach that women that they are subservient to men. The Bible says that women should be loyal to men (if they are married). The Bible never states that "wifes being subservient to there husbands". And the Bible never can be corrupted. The people that teach the…
    • But the bible tells so many magnificent things, then how could an power hungry leader write that kind of stuff? The bible always have ways to teach you and way for you to do good. The Holy Spirit is 1. the spirit of God. 2. the presence of God as part of a person's religious…
  7. 2107.

    Atheism can contribute to atrocities

    For

    • Thanks to my opponent for his response. "your examples of atheism ( with Stalin and Mao) is precisely why I said "InquireTruth, you seem to be confused about what atheism is" My examples are to express that atheism CAN be a causal factor in atrocity. That is all. "First of all…
    • Thank you for you response Mastajake. But let me remind you that whether or not religion shares responsibility in atrocity is a subject for another debate. The question is whether atheism can contribute to atrocity. 1. "They didn't do things in the name of atheism per say a…

    Against

    • First of all sorry, you are right that was armature of me to debate with a contra statement that is completely opposite of the premise you presented. I amend you on that, as well as I would like to thank you for providing me with your sources it is greatly appreciated. Now to…
    • Rebuttal to your (#1) statement - Stalin and Mao clearly evil people but their mal intent on religion was never because they were atheist. They didn't do things in the name of atheism per say a religious extremist would. it was the hate for religious domination in society that…
  8. 2108.

    The Bible shows that Jesus was not God

    For

    • I will conclude this debate with reviewing my initial arguments and how the CON responded. Argument 1. Jesus is not the same as God according to John 14:28. A) It is a simple concept, Jesus is not greater than the father who is God. The Con merely inquired in how I knew the…
    • 1. I am not the Christian, you are. I was a preacher and a teacher for more than a decade. From my understanding the only way to understand scripture is through logic. However through a long process of study, I came to the conclusion that the Bible is not the word of God. You…

    Against

    • Quickly I will address each of these issues. 1. Your understanding is incorrect. The Bible cannot be understood using logic alone. It does not even prove the existence of God. Is is the word of God, His special revelation to His people.2. According to the Bible, it was not…
    • I would like to note some things I have noticed from my opponent before rebuttal. Note 1. Everything my opponent as argued for has hopped back and forth between logic and scripture. Much of scripture is counter intuitive while simultaneously believable. Defining the God in…
  9. 2109.

    Society would be better off without religion

    For

    • I apologize, but I won't be able to continue this debate...I have a lot going on right now.

    Against

    • I "forfeit" this round as well
    • I will be taking the stance that the world would not be any better without religion.
  10. 2110.

    Christian salvation requires specific, clearly defined beliefs

    For

    • so you are basically adding a number 4 then? the resurrection. as for atonement, see christus victor and penal substitution. most christians dont say you have to believe one or the other. what's your magical sollution? you missed the point about the 'believe in your heart and…
    • so here it is then the final decree for all of mankind in a debate post con? what if you believe 1 2 and 3, except you had reason to doubt the resurretion of Jesus? that that mean you're condemned? and you mention in a point after your list, being cleansed by atonement. is this…

    Against

    • Most Christians don't say that because they know you must believe in atonement and resurrection or otherwise, how will you receive forgiveness and let God into your life? My four points are simply paraphrases of what the Bible teaches with verses such as the ones you quoted,…
    • If you don't believe in the resurrection, that is the equivalent of rejecting his victory over death and sin, thus demonstrating you never really believed in the first place. Atonement is required for your sin to be purged, what examples are there for different views on…
  11. 2111.

    The God of the Old Testament is evil

    For

    • First off, I would like to say that I agreed that the burden of proof must fall on me. I did not agree to any of my opponent's definitions. Since I have showed no fewer than twenty different examples of times in which God has committed notable atrocities, and my opponent has…
    • 1) The notion of "Evil" is somewhat subjective, although there are certain actions that are almost universally considered evil; genocide, for example. The subjectivity lies in those things which are not universally agreed upon, such as homosexuality. While some believe…

    Against

    • Actually, all you did was point out 20 instances where you have a different moral preference than God. So what? You have not demonstrated that God is objectively evil. You lose.
    • Well, since "evil" is subjective, you cannot argue God or anyone or anything is objectively evil. You just have your arbitrary preference. Given this, who cares what you think? You have not carried your burden. Sorry. You lose. BTW, when I asked you about how you find evil in a…
  12. 2112.

    Prayer and religious practice should be allowed in public schools

    For

    • Accept if you want. 1st Round: Intro and Opening Statements 2nd and 3rd: Debate Phase 4th: Closing Statements
    • I'll end my stance with this. Religion is not something people should force upon. They can't and won't be able to due to our rights to practice any form of religion or view or philosophy. If a person wants to say prayer, they can. One wants to say silent time, they can. It's…

    Against

    • Sorry, I had computer problems and accept my forfeit with dignity intact. So, also my final stance ends with this. Like you said, it is not something to enforce (sorry to copy). If we were to allow it, the people who runs the majority will make sure that only theirs is passed.…
    • You are in fact correct when you are saying that it is guaranteed by the Federal Constitution of the United States. But in the part that "Congress shall not endorse" is the part that public schools are run by the federal government, therefore abide by the Federal Constitution…
  13. 2113.

    Religious beliefs have no place in a modern society

    For

    • I'm going to start this debate by informing everyone who disagrees with me, you are wrong. My opinions and beliefs are more important than yours, and if you challenge me, you're wrong and borderline unethical as a human being. I don't have to prove why to you. I only need to…
    • Religious beliefs are based on faith and superstitions. The sooner that people would stop believing in these nonsensical fairy-tales for adults, the better and more advanced we would be ethically and scientifically as a society. I'll be arguing the position that religious…

    Against

    • Shame.Extend my arguments.
    • I. IntroductionResolution: Religious beliefs have no place in a modern society.In order for Pro to uphold the Burden of Proof he must show that religious beliefs have NO place in a modern society. Therefore in order to negate the resolution I must show that religious beliefs do…
  14. 2114.

    Jesus is not God

    For

    • Thanks con ,your all argument going under the doctrine of trinity. In respone to Fathe is greater than I , you gave example that an officer is greater than an enlisted person in a rank but both are humanbeing, this example make no sense because it indicate jesus and God same…
    • Thanks con, In this matter we should approach from a scriptual point of view -is the oneness of God -God is constantly ,repeatedly and emphatically stated to be one never three not philosophical pont of view. The word trinity never appeared in the bible.It was Athanasius…

    Against

    • Pro's contradiction and self-refutationThroughout this debate, Pro and I have been basing our arguments on the Bible as if the Bible were the authoritative word of God. In the first round, I said that I took Pro to be arguing from this point of view, and in his reply, he said,…
    • In the last round, I showed that all of Pro's arguments against the deity of Jesus begged the question against the doctrine of the Trinity by assuming God is only one person. So in this round, he attempted to shore up his arguments by arguing that the Trinity is false and that…
  15. 2115.

    Gods do not exist

    For

    • My Rebuttals: 1) In response to the first paragraph of Con"s argument: the god of the gaps means not that God is non existent, because part of a deity's attributes is its ability to be omnipotent and omnipresent, but the god of the gaps means that God is not necessary for…
    • I thank Balacafa for accepting my challenge and I'd like to start my argument by inserting the disclaimer that I don't think that there is no way to fully disprove the existence of a god/gods. Likewise, there is no way to prove the existence of god. Major Point #1…

    Against

    • God is necessary for explaining the gap. God gives man the capacity for science. Much of life may seem uncertain, but look at what we can count on day after day: gravity remains consistent, a hot cup of coffee left on a counter will get cold, the earth rotates in the same 24…
    • While the God of the gap issue is a diminishing one in how we present it we need to replace it with an understanding that there is no gap. God is all around and directly and indirectly steers our world view. Science can actually prove the existence of God. We"re at the right…
  16. 2116.

    Students should not be allowed to bring holy books to public schools

    For

    • To start, I would like to state that I am an openly nonreligious person and I don't mean to offend anyone by this debate. Anyways. .. . My contentions: 1. ) As you stated in your previous post, students should learn about different cultures from around the world. I couldn't…
    • A thank anyone who accepts my open challenge. My stance on the subject is that public schools are one of the only places these days where students of all ages can get away from the prejudiced world outside. If students are allowed to bring holy books into school stating their…

    Against

    • 1. " Students should also be able to learn the basic concepts of different religions WITHOUT bringing holy documents in." this would be very hard to do considering that the text in the bible or any other books contain the history and beliefs of a religion. In order to learn…
    • Students should be able to bring holy books in school to be able to learn about differemt religion and culture. I will post my argument in the next round so that both my opponent and I can have the same amount of argument rounds.
  17. 2117.

    Practicing organized religion hinders human intellectual development

    For

    • The idea was to rebut against Con's arguments. Nevertheless... Organised religions promote the belief in one book, and that one book as the sole truth that has revelation about this character named 'God' and/or other deities. You are not a follower of that particular religion…
    • My argument is that practising an organised religion leads to a suppression/hinderance of human intellect. An easy definition of 'organised religion' : a set of formal rules and procedures derived from an ancient scripture (Bible, Qur'an, Veda's, Guru Granth Sahib, Torah etc.).…

    Against

    • I accept. Please state your arguments as to why practicing an organized religion is hindering human intellect.
    • God could ave definitely existed:In the beginning, there was nothing but the black hole singularity according to the big bang theory. This is as far back as we know. All of the matter/energy in the universe was stored inside the singularity. Some choose to argue that time was…
  18. 2118.

    Openly gay people should be fully accepted in the Catholic Church

    For

    • Catholic means universal, we are all sinners (Homosexual 'sex' is a sin according to the Catholic Church), and the Catholic Church cannot deny people from entry when it proclaims that it is one of the only ways to heaven. This is a few of my points, please no ad hominem attacks.
    • I am getting the feeling that in general we may agree with each other. It seems that you interpreted the 'should' in should homosexuals be aloud into the Catholic Church more as a could. However, I meant 'should' as in it would not be logical or theological sound for the…

    Against

    • To start off, I'm an Orthodox Jew. We don't instantly turn down homosexuals (we try and help them change), but the reason why I think the Catholic Church should be able to turn down Homosexuals is because IT'S A PRIVATE RELIGION. They are allowed to believe what they want.…
    • You're right when you say I agree with you in some ways, but it's a little twisted so I'm going to clear that up. I think the Catholic Church SHOULD be allowed to turn down Homosexuals, but I'm not exactly happy they do that. But the problem is we can make them go against their…
  19. 2119.

    Homosexuality and bisexuality are forbidden by the Bible

    For

    • but on the the actual debate: you are splitting hairs. By the dicionary deffinition a homaosexual is a person who ingages in or practces sexual relations with someone of the same sex. So just because you find someone attractive doesn't mean that you are homo or bisexual if they…
    • I can and will prove that homosexuality is mentioned and said to be wrong/bad in more than one book of the bible. Anyone who wants to debate me start how ever you want. I am open to all coments

    Against

    • I am not splitting hairs. Homosexuals are attracted to individuals of the same gender. There are more than a few who are Christian and choose not to act on those feelings specifically because the condemnation is upon the actions and not upon the feeling. Further, a good many…
    • The Bible is against homosexual sex not homosexuality. There are about six different parts sections of the Bible which specifically condemn homosexual sex. This is not a condemnation of homosexuality as being homosexual only has a slight causal relationship to having homosexual…
  20. 2120.

    Religious symbols should be banned in public buildings

    For

    • Western societies are secularly focused
    • Many symbols are seen as a symbol of oppression on women.

    Against

    • It is their culture and religion.
    • If you ban one thing, you have to ban lots of things.
  21. 2121.

    Christianity has had a positive effect on humankind overall

    For

    • . . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contention 1: The Bible upholds human dignity and has supported the sanctity of life…
    • Again, thanks to my opponent for the debate . . . I definitely have my work cut out for me with the defence of my contentions. . . but here goes. . . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contention 1: The Bible…

    Against

    • ====================================================== Contention 1: The Bible upholds human dignity and has supported the sanctity of life ====================================================== {*My opponent has failed to explain any greater honor than being made in the image…
    • ====================================================== Contention 1: The Bible upholds human dignity and has supported the sanctity of life ====================================================== {*This Law firstly, is in the Old Testament, which means that it no longer applies…
  22. 2122.

    Jehovah's Witnesses should be classified as a cult

    For

    • I would like to add this argument to my case: 1) All religions are technically cults 2) Jehovah's Witnesses are a religion 3) Because all religions are techincally cults Jehovah's Witnesses are therefore technically a cult. "Based on A Christianity is not a cult."- Sorry Con,…
    • Premise: Cults require members to make drastic changes in their lives (History Channel: Cults, Dangerous Devotion) and Jehovah's Witnesses are required to quit smoking, celebrating holidays, date and marry only other Witnesses, ect. (What Does the Bible Really Teach?) In…

    Against

    • On your last comment, I just want to make a quick disclaimer. I was shooting for comical arrogance so your not really supposed to take that comment seriously, just you know… laugh and have fun. Anyway back to the debate, there are 2 Major Reasons you lose this debate. Reason…
    • Second thing I would like to do is ask that my opponent to take a look at the popularity rating this debate has gotten already. Numerous debate members of this site viewed this debate and did not like its set up at all so they voted it down in popularity. This is because of the…
  23. 2123.

    There is a logical argument for God's existence

    For

    • First, let me address inaccuracies on Con's part: Well, guess what else is "at" the beginning of the universe? You guessed it: the universe is at the beginning of the universe. According to the Standard Model of Cosmology, there was no universe. There was no space, no time, no…
    • "unreliable creationist websites" The numbers come from Roger Penrose' calculations. Your demeaning opinions on these websites doesn't change the source material. There are plenty of books and articles about his lifelong body of work and accomplishments in the theoretical…

    Against

    • Clearly, Pro wants me to address the source material. I will now do so. Let's take a look at the original publication in which Penrose comes up with the number Pro relies on: 10^10^123 [1]. Pro defined this number as "the probability of a Universe that can support life."…
    • Saying "God is simpler," [read as "God is more complex", see Comments] assumes all knowledge to be able to weigh God vs spontaneous or random creation. No, it does not make that assumption at all. My claim that the explanation invoking God is more complex is based on the fact…
  24. 2124.

    Homosexuality is compatible with Christian doctrine

    For

    • On the Cause of EvilThere has been no misapprehension in my part. Droughts and soil depletion, as reasons for why crops fail, has nothing to do with biological evolution! Biological evolution cannot explain earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic erruptions, hurricanes, etc. Biological…
    • On the Original sin The doctrine of the original sin does not in any way contradict reality. Every good things comes from God but every bad things is from the inevitable consequence of the original sin. "Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of…

    Against

    • Misinformation & Scientific Corrections:Droughts and soil depletion, as reasons for why crops fail, has nothing to do with biological evolution! Biological evolution cannot explain earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic erruptions, hurricanes, etc. Biological evolution cannot address…
    • Original Sin and the Problem of Evil:Why do the piously-religious give credit to God for all the good and wonderful occurrences in their life and the world, yet blame ALL the bad things on Humanity and Sin?! In other words, butterflies, rainbows, flowers, happiness, love,…
  25. 2125.

    The Qur'an promotes violence against non-believers

    For

    • These arguments have been nearly impossible to refute so I will try my best. First off, my opponent mentions that terrorism is a result of a bad mental state. However, in non-islamic countries you also have people in bad mental states and I don't think I have ever heard of a…
    • Thank you for the interesting explanations. My opponent and I have both agreed that I will wait until next round to post any other points in order to give him more space to refute the remainder of the existing arguments.

    Against

    • I want to start by thanking my opponent for being exceptionally kind and letting me present full rebuttals to her arguments. I hope that they will be of good quality! -- Content -- Rebuttal Section: o Increase in Disease? o Verses Preaching Hatred Toward Jews? o Middle…
    • Thank you for the quick response. -- Content -- Rebuttals: • 1. Previous Round o 5:12-13 o 5:14 o 5:64 o 8:12 o 8:15-16 o 9:5 o 98:6 • 2. Current Round[*] o Increase in Disease? o Verses Preaching Hatred Toward Jews? o Middle Easterners View Jews 'Unfavourably' o Wars in the…
  26. 2126.

    God endorsed the death penalty in the Old Testament

    For

    • god did warrant the death penalty as punishment for many crimes. I only gave a few example, which was all necessary to prove the resolution.
    • God says multiple times not to commit murder, but also he says multiple times which crimes should result in death. God would not contradict himself if He is all-knowing, so He must not consider the death penalty to be murder. Tinkerbell uses the quote from Leviticus 24:15, "Say…

    Against

    • An example that I have is: You shall not commit murder. -Deuteronomy 5:17 NIV In Leviticus 24:15 it says " Say to the Israelites:"If anyone curses his God, he will be held responsible." You stated that they blasphemed God's names, they did not commit a crime the basically just…
  27. 2127.

    The Bible is an accurate source of scientific knowledge and information

    For

    • John, You, sir, are the embodiment of the new atheist. You belong, good John, to those who have such fundamental flaws in their thought, most probably fuelled by a desire to look different, in turn fuelled by many insecurities, that you are actually undermining your own school…
    • John, This is my first debate on this forum, I am not sure how this works to be entirely honest with you, so, if you would humour any mistake that I make concerning the format of this discussion. I would like to primarily take issue with your technique of argumentation. Not…

    Against

    • Note: This is a rebuttal of my opponent's points. You probably want to follow along with his second round of arguments to understand what I'm saying. Thanks. My opponent starts with a bang ... or something like that. "You, sir, are the embodiment of the new atheist." I think…
    • To start, I'd like to cite my source for some of my second argument. This was (partially) a quote from the Skeptic's Annotated Bible, a set of bible footnotes based off of the commonly used King James Bible. I've done this debate before against Bible2000, but he was unable to…
  28. 2128.

    Scientology meets the conventional definition of a religion

    For

    • R1: Acceptance R2: Argument R3: Rebuttal R4: Closing statement(limited new argument allowed) I will be taking the position that Scientology under modern definitions fits the criteria of a religion. This is NOT about whether or not you believe that Scientology is good or bad, or…
    • Thank you to Con for their reply. In this debate, I have shown based on common definitions that Scientology qualifies as a religion. Con argues that the Church of Scientology is a "criminal cult" but provides no definition for that term. Con at no point provided evidence of…

    Against

    • I think that Scientology is in no way a proper religion. This round is just introduction, and as such I will provide a counter-interpretation with definitions so that the debate is more focused. My definition of a Religion- a personal set or institutionalized system of…
    • Let's go over main points. First off, the pro tries to shove my entire argument under the rug by says that I did not provide a definition of criminal cult. A criminal cult is obvious, just use the definition my opponent brought up of a cult, and add the words "broke the law. "…
  29. 2129.

    Religion is a reliable source of guidance

    For

    • sure
    • religion cant exist without anyone being in a religion am i holding a rock in my hand as i type this?

    Against

    • My opponent seems to agree with me. I take this as some form of concession. If it is not, then my opponent still has a round to explain otherwise.Until then, extend my arguments.
    • Thank you, vi_spex.I do not think that my opponent's responses are relevant to this debate. Ultimately, the voters will be left to decide whether my judgement is correct.Extend the rest of my arguments.
  30. 2130.

    God should play no role in American public life

    For

    • "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." -John Adams -If that's not true than why is it the people trying to change things so much in the Constitution are trying to make it more for an…
    • This Country was founded on God, by Religious people. God needs to stay in our Constitution, on our Money, in our schools, and in our lives.

    Against

    • "I do not reject your Christ, I love your Christ. It is just that so many of you Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Ghandi This will seem like a mildly unorthodox way of attacking your point but I will do so anyways. ""Our Constitution was made only for a moral and…
    • Sure, I'll argue this one. First and foremost I need something to argue against but I guess I will make a couple of points on what you have said so far. "This Country was founded on God" >>How so, I would argue that it was founded on principle of breaking away from Britain? "By…
  31. 2131.

    God is a human invention

    For

    • Proof that god was made up-Control over humans by fear of hell.Controling by fear is tactic that has been used and is used by many dictators and it works.Churches getting free money in the bible it says that people should give percent of their salary to church.If you just used…
    • God what is god or who is god even in the bible is not explained what actualy is god.And there is no proof that he exists.Dont tell me to look arround and see that life couldnt have just came out of no where.I would say that god is made up becouse we dont understand verry good…

    Against

    • Actually, this idea of hell was instituted with Christianity, in Judaism we don't really believe in hell, nowhere in the Tanakh are there warnings of hell or orders to give Christian Church's money. Since Judaism existed before Christianity, and is the first religion to profess…
    • My opponent may be able to claim that G-d does not exist based on no eidence, but not propose a way that the idea of G-d came into existance without proof, my oppponent therefore must prove that humans made up G-d.
  32. 2132.

    The world would be better off without organized religion

    For

    • I would like to thank con for taking the time to define the debate and I wish to state that I completely agree with his definition. I don't wish to make this debate about the legitimacy of religion and the ideas it preaches as it does not much bother me wether someone believes…
    • I will be arguing that Religion is a force for evil and that the world would be in a far better condition without it.

    Against

    • In conclusion, Pro has not met his burden of proof.
    • I leave it to the voters.
  33. 2133.

    Religious bloodshed is righteous if God exists

    For

    • Re: 'Argument on the Condonement of Righteousness' (Con):While it's quite true that I cannot know God's will directly, we can deduce conclusions from observation and the definitions we're using. I said, "God could want those beliefs to exist as they are to achieve a particular…
    • Re: 'Argument on the Condonement of Righteousness' (Con): I agree with all premises presented, but hold contention with the validity of the conclusions. The conclusions of my opponent's argument rely on the assumption that if religious beliefs are in line with God has intended…

    Against

    • Condonement of Righteousness I honestly don't understand the logic that my opponent presents here. I am fully aware that God is omnipotent and omniscient. How does omniscience and omnipotence mean that everything that God does is in accordance with his will? This links back to…
    • Thanks Chaosism! Condonement Of Righteousness My opponent states that God could want those beliefs to exist as they are to achieve a particular end. The key word here is could. My opponent must speak on the behalf of ALL God's that coincide with this definition. Many Gods that…
  34. 2134.

    The Bible is the best book ever written

    For

    • Fine with me.
    • Well?

    Against

    • It is true because I like other books more than the bible. That simple. And if it really is the 'best book', Which no book really is, It is completely relevant to bring other people into this argument.
    • that is an insanely subjective statement. It might be true for you, But it is certainly not for most people.
  35. 2135.

    Jesus was actually the son of God

    For

    • con just gives some off the cuff reasons he thinks God wouldn't have a son. there could be plenty of off the cuff reasons for him to have a son though, such as to be mroe like us, etc. but the main point is the witness of the early church, not just hte bible, but including the…
    • sadf

    Against

    • It's k. Just come back if u can
    • Oh, God. Im very very very sorry for leaving this debate for so long. I had an important family emergency which could not wait. Sorry. Anyways, Thank you for your argument. Firstly , I would like to point out a serious issue. This is the issue of blind faith, which is very…
  36. 2136.

    There should be no religion

    For

    • Argument: 1.Religion starts many wars and violence throughout our nation. 2. Most religions are manly based around the MALE. 3. People are commonly judged by their religion. I am looking forward to your rebuttals so i can rebut them as well.
    • Thanks for joining and good luck!

    Against

    • I accept. This one should be fun.
    • Thanks to my opponent for the argument. 1. It doesn't matter in relation to my argument whether anyone believes in God for Him to objectively exist. If He exists, His existence is objective truth. The abolition of religion would mean, if God existed, that we would be moving…
  37. 2137.

    The Bible contains irreconcilable contradictions

    For

    • First of all, I am not but an atheist. I am for science. I can say that it is impossible that the first humans (Adam and Eve in the bible) were actually civilized. Nor it is possible that there is unlimited energy in one being. If there was the great flood or not, floods are…
    • Let's finish this up and get to the voting. This has been quite an interesting debate if nothing else.First, to my opponent, I meant not the punctuation remark as an insult. I simply struggled to read and understand what you were saying in some of your points because of a lack…

    Against

    • Nothing?? At least someone in the comments try and find one, I actually can't believe the atheist's are this silent maybe the bible really is the infallible inerrant inspired word of the Living God.
    • Anything else?????
  38. 2138.

    Jesus was not a white man

    For

    • All arguments extended again I guess.
    • Not entirely sure what to do now. My first debate. All arguments extended?

    Against

    • In the bible it says nothing about Jesus being white. It also says nothing about how god was created or if he has been since the beginning of time. Also if Adam and eve were forbidden from Eden then where is Eden.
  39. 2139.

    Unnecessary suffering is evidence against God's existence

    For

    • [The Debate] I as Pro will seek to provide argument to support the proposition that God (as defined) does not exist is more likely true than false with a focus on suffering. Definitions God - An omniscient, omnipotent, loving, morally perfect*, supernatural, personal being. *…
    • I thank ssadi for their reply.God exists vs God does not exist & occams razorRecall the following two options that are compatible with the data referred to in the previous round...H1) God exists, yet choose not to stop those things from happening.H2) No God exists, as such no…

    Against

    • I accept. BoP is on Pro. I as Con will seek to refute Pro's "arguments to support the proposition that God doesn't exist is more likely true than false with a focus on suffering".
    • I am terribly sorry for FF! I almost finished preparing my arguments, but, unfortunately, due to an unexpected personal issue I was unable to submit them! I wish it didn't happen, but such things may happen sometimes! I really apologize for it. . * - important! I will…
  40. 2140.

    Without God, life has no ultimate purpose or meaning

    For

    • MeaningMeaning In Life Can Only Have Value If It Is Limited:Just because each moment becomes less noticable, that doesn't by no means reduce the collective worth of all of our "moments", so to speak. If there is no God, it doesn't matter whatsoever if you lived a good life or a…
    • No kritiks,No ad hominemI am not saying that people cannot have a subjective illusion of purpose without God. Nor am I saying that atheists are necessarily bad or boring people. What I am defending is that if God does not exist, life has no ultimate objective meaning, value, or…

    Against

    • Meaning In Life Can Only Have Value If It Is Limited: What makes life valuable is that we have an idea of that which is precious. A world where things can only be discovered once, where life may end at any time, these make life valuable. In a world of immortality, nothing would…
    • Essentially, you argue that because everything that lives will die, and if there is not an afterlife, that would require all actions be completely meaningless. I will offer two separate arguments that prove that wrong:Meaning In Life Can Only Have Value If It Is Limited:Life is…
  41. 2141.

    The Bible condones the slavery practiced in the American South

    For

    • how do i forefit
    • crap i didn't realise you were against i thought i was against

    Against

    • You would have to wait until the time runs out. However, you could also just put something random or post and empty round to make it go faster.
    • Voters, we are going to be forfeiting from here on out, please tie this debate since my opponent didn't mean to accept his position.
  42. 2142.

    Christian upbringing constitutes brainwashing

    For

    • Hello, I am Pleco In this debate, I shall bare the burden of proof to show you how Christianity uses brainwashing techniques, and why it is wrong. In the first round, we shall introduce each other and explain what our position is briefly, like I have done above. Then, we shall…
    • It is immoral because it forces the person to turn away from certain political and scientific views. Congregations usually show a bias in politics and motivate others to join that cause. Children in a religious family are usually forced to turn away from scientific facts, which…

    Against

    • 1. you assume that the promise of salvation is false and that god's existence is outrageous. But thats a different debate for a different time whether or not it is. They believe these things sincerly there not saying these things so they can get some gain out of it they have no…
    • Hello, I am Pleco In this debate, I shall bare the burden of proof to show you how Christianity uses brainwashing techniques, and why it is wrong. i would like to also point out youve done nothing so far to prove what christians are doing is wrong brainwashing as you call it…
  43. 2143.

    It is possible that God exists

    For

    • before I start I will say something, since I was not able to change the resolution in time my opponent now must argue that in no possiblity in no way does god exist. He has to prove that all proof leads to the denial of god, which he has not done. "Physicists think that even…
    • Thank you for accepting :) Rebutals: My opponents big bang theory: It is pretty universal that the big bang happened, but how it happened is a mystery. The theory is that the universe had no matter before it started, another theory was it was only hydrogen and helium, so answer…

    Against

    • There was matter and there was antimatter. When they met, they annihilated each other and created light. Somehow, it seems that there was a tiny fraction more matter than antimatter, so when nature took its course, the universe was left with some matter, no antimatter, and a…
    • According to the big bang theory, the universe began by expanding from an infinitesimal volume with extremely high density and temperature. The universe was initially significantly smaller than even a pore on your skin. With the big bang, the fabric of space itself began…
  44. 2144.

    The Christian God grants humanity freedom of choice

    For

    • "II. The Existence of God My opponent's objection is a metaphor, which is also invalid. He does not present an affirmative case claiming that God exists; he only attempts to negate mine. The truth is that there is no answer to the question that leaves God omnipotent. Either he…
    • One can easily conclude here that libertarian free will cannot exist. Therefore, the resolution is negated. " _ I would like to see any real articles or anything from Dr. Ye before I conclude this, but Dr. Ye theory can be wrongful for these reasons. : * Not all determination…

    Against

    • My opponent made no attempt to meet burden of proof. The resolution is further negated because, as I have shown: =Free will does not exist. =God cannot exist. =If God were to exist and be omnibenevolent, it wouldn't be the Christian God. Thank you. My Devil's Advocacy is…
    • Unfortunately, my opponent has forfeited a round. Extend my arguments.
  45. 2145.

    Organized religion is good for society

    For

    • Organized religion is beneficial to society. Religion is beneficial to society because it 1. Provides emotional comfort to people who seek answers to troubling and un-answerable questions. 2. Provides a community through which people can enjoy themselves, meet others, and…

    Against

    • Since my opponent has refused to make his arguments I will keep this brief. Thought history religion has been the cause of most conflict, people during the holocaust where singled out and murdered on a incomprehensibly large scale purely because there religion was considered…
    • Would like to give my opponent a chance to publish his argument.
  46. 2146.

    Jesus's teachings do not condemn homosexuality

    For

    • Why do christians say that homosexual marriage is wrong if jesus never mentioned a word about it? I'll let my opponent state his/her argument then I will attempt to counter it in the next round.
    • Sorry about the other post. This website was glitching up on me. the sexual immoral are the heterosexuals, see how they are separate from the homosexuals. So you need to clarify your definition of fornication. Is it two unmarried heterosexuals having sex? Or is it two unmarried…

    Against

    • Although I am a Christian, I am not going to allow my personal views on homosexuality reflect on my argument. Rather, I will simply use biblical evidence to support a thesis. While Jesus Christ himself may not have spoken out against homosexuality, the Bible does maintain a…
    • As someone new to debate.org, I can already tell it has severe issues with glitching. Therefore, I apologize for my unfair and false accusation. I digress. To clear up what you have asked me to, fornication is simply sexual intercourse of any kind (whether sodomy or not) before…
  47. 2147.

    Mathematics can prove the existence of God

    For

    • CON 1)That's not mathematical proof. You simply created a 3D model and labelled it with numbers randomly. There is no evidence for any of this stuff that you are asserting, such as how you "reverse engineered" a false Jerusalem that doesn't exist. RESP: First, the numbers are…
    • Metrology is defined by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) as "the science of measurement, embracing both experimental and theoretical determinations at any level of uncertainty in any field of science and technology." Under the authority of the Metric…

    Against

    • "You still refuse to read the proof which enables the creation of the "3D model", thus your statement is simply opinion."I have drawn that conclusion based on the evidence that you have given me in this debate."I have provided you with the page numbers, the link to the sources,…
    • "Man cannot be judge of God's existence or in-existence with their own inaccurate measuring tools and their destructive standards, policy, laws, etc..."I agree, we cannot know 100% either way of God's existence, due to the God Hypothesis being unfalsifiable. However, lack of…
  48. 2148.

    Christianity does more harm than good

    For

    • Christianity is silly make believe nonsense and following its teachings is pointless and harmful in general.

    Against

    • Thank you for reading.
    • Please carry my arguments.
  49. 2149.

    Christians should support the death penalty

    For

    • First allow me to point out that you completely looked over four of my NEW TESTAMENT scriptures. Since you have ignored them, they still stand as plausable arguments in my favor. These scriptures are: Rom. 13:3-4--- "For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for…
    • It is in fact an interesting topic, and I have not yet debated it. This should be fun, no matter what the turn out. Now to the real issue. .. The death Penalty. It was supported in the Old Testament, thats for sure. Gen. 9:6--- "Whoever sheds man's blood, By man his blood shall…

    Against

    • To respond to your New Testament quotes: (Please note that I cannot comment on every passage only because we are using different versions of the Bible, and I never said that the King James version was "better", I only said I was using it so there are some big differences in…
    • Thank You Renzzy, and good luck. The Old Testament surely does make a strong case for the death penalty, but it also makes a strong case for other things. Eating habits and diets were very strict in those days, along with animal sacrifice, clothing style, ect. Most everything…
  50. 2150.

    It is reasonable to have faith in religion

    For

    • I'd like to now ask about atheists and their lack of faith in religion. The fact they are so anti-religion shows something is not right. Religion is a man-made creation about spirituality. Since it is man-made it has value. To attack religion for its misuse by the people is…
    • I already wrote everything in my original post.

    Against

    • "Reason" is independant of faith. Medicine is, utterly, researchable. You just didn't feel like doing that much learning. State the facts that show that reincarnation is real
    • If you have the biggest pile of faith that you can, possibly make, you, still, have a pile of nothing. Please, state what is trustworthy about religion

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.