Discussly

Religion Debate Topics — page 34

3,675 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 34 of 74
  1. 1651.

    There is no rational reason to believe in God

    For

    • This is the fifth and final round of this debate. There will be no rebuttals or new arguments. I will now make my conclusion. While science is constantly making discoveries and encouraging us to rethink what we know, I believe that humility is one of the most crucial traits we…
    • Thank you Mhykiel. Godel's Ontological Argument "My opponent opposes accepting the axioms the argument is based on. They attempt to illustrate that accepting the axiom as "true" is irrational because it might not be so." The problem I see concerns axiom 4, which states "If a…

    Against

    • Thank you JayShayWhat can be more humbling than acknowledging a being as great as God?A beleif in God has not stopped science or human advancement. But that is a different debate.The resolution being deiscussed right now is, "There is No Rational Reason to Believe in God". In…
    • Thank you jayShay3R1 Gödel's Ontological Argument: Use of AxiomsPro contends there is no reason to accept the Axioms as true because "there is no possible way to demonstrate its validity". An axiom is an irreducible primary. It doesn't rest upon anything in order to be valid,…
  2. 1652.

    Belief in an afterlife is a self-deception fostered by the Bible

    For

    • you make a fair point and I'm not saying not to believe what they want I like how it hives people hope but is it truly okay to go through life worshiping these gods and sacrificing so much for them. plus there are hundreds of religion in the world how could someone e so nieve…
    • My first point will be that all through history there has been religion and one thing nearly all these regions have in common is the idea of 'a life after death' my personal belif was that it was a way too get young men to join armys too fight it is easier to risk ones life if…

    Against

    • Overall I believe it is perfectly fine for the bible and other forms of religion to help people believe in life after feath as it gives them peace of mind and helps them grieve.
    • It is okay for them to go through life believing as it is what they believe and so they are not na"ve as to them they are right and so that's all that matters to them.
  3. 1653.

    Atheism is not a credible worldview

    For

    • Hi Corneliusok, I see you forfeited the last round and therefore debate presumably. That's a shame.Repeated requests for some argument from you for your position were therefore ignored I presume. That's the atheist's problem see, there are no positive arguments essentially.…
    • Hi Cornelius, I get the distinct impression that you do not wish to continue with the debate, that's a shame. I've heard no arguments for why atheism is credible at all. Totally believe in separation of church and state. Likewise secularism and atheism shouldn't be pushed onto…

    Against

    • "Hi Cornelius, it's good that you had a chance to come back to the argument. When I say that you are a practising atheist (that was a little joke) I did not intend to mean that you do all those anti-God things in your life. But you have to admit, you may not have noticed it I…
    • Pro: " Hey Cornelius, good to meet you. Hope we can have a good debate on this topic. I see your definition of atheism and hope to get you to see that, atheism is not just about your ideas of gods etc. Those are the ones typical of religious gods, so you must have some sort of…
  4. 1654.

    Scripture forbids Christmas trees

    For

    • Lindsay, Jesus may have created the New Covenant, but Old Testament rulings (that weren't disputed within the New Testament itself) still abide. Otherwise, why do Christians still honor the Ten Commandments? Also, idoltry and the worship of other gods are strictly forbidden…
    • Biblical scripture expressly forbids the use of Christmas Trees. So, why is it okay for Christians to directly violate scripture, especially in the name of honoring the birth of Jesus Christ? Here is the specific verse: Jeremiah 10: 1-9 1 Hear ye the word which the Lord…

    Against

    • I had to lose last round because I didn't have internet access. Regardless, I stand by what I said, and feel no need to rebuttle any of your statements based on the fact that Christ hadn't come to Earth when the Old Testament was written. No offense, but it defeats your entire…
    • I will not make this long. I will simply disprove your statement, and probably win this debate in one round. You claim that "Scripture forbids Christmas Trees" and you back your information with an excerpt from Jeremiah. Jeremiah was one of the 5 books of major prophets,…
  5. 1655.

    Religion has a practical role in postmodern society

    For

    • I am more than slightly confused why it was necessary to use the phrase postmodern society if you are just going to give multiple definitions of it and basically apply them all to society now. Why wouldn't you just say "Does organized religion have a place in a society today?"…
    • Accept, good luck to my opponant.

    Against

    • The topic is as it is said. We each get 3 rounds each, with the first round whether you accept this challenge or not, and saying that you have(n't) accepted the challenge. A "practical role" meaning something constructive, such as charitable work, or teaching, or equivalent.…
    • Alright. I shall thank my opponent for accepting the debatee, and swear at debate.org for giving e eighty-something e-mails in a period of two days. I am annoyed now... -_-. Also, i apologise for the formatting, but I was copying and pasting from notes I have from other word…
  6. 1656.

    Islam is the best religion in the world

    For

    • islam is a very good religion you know why because it teaches us respect.think about your religion example:christian they belive in jesus us we believe that jesus is a prophet of god and only there is only one god . its say in the quran: "ALLAH is HE besides Whom there is none…

    Against

    • My opponent has failed to prove Islam is the best religion in the world. There are other religions such as Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, ect... He must prove that Islam is better than all of the others.
    • My opponent says that Islam is the best religion in the world, yet he has failed to prove why. He is arguing against all religions, but by using nothing else but verses from the Qu'ran. His example of Christianity proves nothing at all. I could say the same thing about the…
  7. 1657.

    The Quran contains contradictions and discrepancies

    For

    • My opponent unfortunately had to forfeit the last round.As such I will extend my arguments of contradictions in the Koran to the next round. I believe these contradictions are enough to prove my case and defined in the final round.Back over to my opponent.
    • Thanks to my opponent for the challenge.All I need to do to win this debate is to show that one discrepancy or contradiction exists in the Koran. For that reason my arguments will be short and I hope the readers do not hold that against me in voting. The burden lies on my…

    Against

    • Rules:1. The source must be cited for every quote.2. Images are allowed to post verses from Quran as images (arabic only)3. The pro must post which translation of Quran he/she uses, so con can check it.4. Also, pro must show which translation of hadith he/she uses, so con can…
    • First of all I did not say you should use or you could have used better translation, I just pointed out you are using Pickthall translation, which means the web site you were quoting from also uses Pickthall translation, obviously you were not aware of that. Secondly, I did not…
  8. 1658.

    The Bible contains no contradictions

    For

    • In my final round, I would like to take a brief overview of the debate, and give the best case for the remaining supposed contradictions. My opponent has once again conceded her Second, Third*, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth claims. My opponent has conceded to 13 of her 16 claims…
    • My opponent concedes to the inaccuracy of her First, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh, and Twelfth claims. Supposed Contradiction #4, which is the first instance of God changing His mind, shall now be Supposed Contradiction #1. I shall now answer my opponent's…

    Against

    • Thank you for your response. I can see that my [Genesis 6:6] example could be construed as personification, and so I concede. ---- You misunderstood the key sentence in source #4. It states that "The toxins are highly labile in purified form, maintaining activity for only 2−5…
    • Thank you for the response. Again, you make good points. I will try to be more precise in my meaning pertaining to God's change of mind. For clarity: change one's mind: to change one's opinions or intentions. God saw that mankind was good, but in [Gensis 6] God saw that evil…
  9. 1659.

    Religion is harmful to society

    For

    • Religion is Harmful to SocietyIt promotes irrational thought. Things like Catastrophizing, Minimization, Grandiosity, Personalization, Magical thinking, Leaps in logic, "All or nothing" thinking, Paranoia and Delusional thinking are all promoted by…
    • "i really don't know if i am right in the point i made at round 1 cos i didn't do enough research."So you're lazy and don't want to debate. You want me to do all the work for you, eh?Sorry, if you want to debate, you need to do some research.Thanks anyway.

    Against

    • I accept your challenge. This is my second debate here. I hope it goes better than my first one were the opposition forfeited every round -_-.
    • I don't pretend I am an expert in anthropology. So no I am not sure about my position. Its just an opinion. Every debate is an opportunity to learn and you throw it away. I am not an anthropologist and If I was I would not waste my time debating anthropology in this community.…
  10. 1660.

    All religions are false

    For

    • I have not the time nor the desire to argue semantics with my opponent, as he seems to employ often in his debates. Therefore I concede defeat to avoid a waste of time.
    • Resolved: There is not sufficient evidence to support that a god in any form claimed by any religion exists. If, by chance, a deity of some sort existed, it would certainly not be anything like any organized religion has claimed. Conclusion: All organized religions are wrong.…

    Against

    • I negate, that "All religions are incorrect." PRO has the burden of proof to show that the resolution is true, as it is a statement that he put forth and is attempting to show that it is correct. Even if I lose all my arguments and refutations, as long as my opponent has not…
    • Burden of proof and definitions are the basic setup of any debate.
  11. 1661.

    Religion is no longer needed in modern society

    For

    • I appreciate the fact that my friend has accepted that there is no basic need for religion as such. and i consider it as my plus point as i have been able to convince him. But i am not satisfied yet because clearly he is not ready to believe in what i am saying. I will start…
    • my friend here has explained in a detailed form as to how religion is necessary or how first there is demand and hence the supply. but i want to make one thing very clear that if we say that whatever we do is because of our need then we can never learn from our mistakes. i know…

    Against

    • I think there is a problem with Pros response. Since from the opening around and again the last round Pro spends alot of time arguing that religion can be used for harm or is undesirable or has a net negative effect on humanity and perhaps even humanity would be better without…
    • Has Pro being able to advance his case that their is no need for religion ? Has Pro being able to refute my arguments that support the claim that there is a need for religion ? I don't think Pro has being able to do either I shall now explain in more detail. [Economic] It seems…
  12. 1662.

    Gay people cannot be genuine Christians

    For

    • "I thought we were all sinners? We were born sinners? Like I said before, being homosexual is not always a choice. In order to be religious all you have to do is believe in a organized belief structurer and believe in god(s). Based on the definition of religion at least." "I…
    • Now this round will be all rebuttals. "I would like to point out that, sinners can be repented and granted eternal life, if they believe in Jesus. Will a benevolent god, who understands every action that you take, really send you to hell, based on your sexual orientation?" A…

    Against

    • I do agree with what you said about the study presented in 2000. However, I fail to see how disproving the fact that the amount of "male hormone" in your body, disprove genetics, and the brain that is responsible for sexual orientation. For an example, the amygdalae that is…
    • "So remember this: since God condemns sinfulness, you cannot love God if you practice the sin." I thought we were all sinners? We were born sinners? Like I said before, being homosexual is not always a choice. In order to be religious all you have to do is believe in a…
  13. 1663.

    Homosexuality is a sin

    For

    • Thank you CON for replying and accepting this challenge, It does clearly state in the Bible in 1Corinthians 6:9 "Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual…
    • Rules: No swearing, bad attitudes, ect. Just a friendly debate, have fun:)

    Against

    • I look forward to the debate. I expect PRO and I agree on many issues including my belief that homosexual SEX is condemned in the Bible. I disagree with PRO"s position as the word homosexuality generally refers to more than just the act of homosexual sex. By way of definition…
    • Since pro did not post to round 3, I will simply summarize his and my argument. Definitions Homosexuality - 1. Sexual attraction or desire for the same sex 2. Sexual intercourse or sexual contact with the same sex Sin - Any offense to God or His standard Bible - The 66 books of…
  14. 1664.

    Christianity's scriptures and God contain many flaws

    For

    • I extend all arguments. from the past two rounds
    • My opponent first paragraph showed me something let me quote what my opponent has said in the first paragraph of round 1: "I believe the burden of proof is on my opponent to show that Christianity has flaws, not the other way around. It is he who needs to first point out the…

    Against

    • I believe the burden of proof is on my opponent to show that Christianity has flaws, not the other way around. It is he who needs to first point out the flaws, then let me address them to show that the flaws are not genuine, but only imagined. I would also like to ask how it is…
  15. 1665.

    Belief in God is rationally justifiable

    For

    • - I must confess, English is not my native language, & on top of that I have studied Philosophy in another language, & so it has been a bit of challenge to figure out which corresponds to which between my native language & English. I hope the voters would understand my position…
    • BOF: It should be noted that Con, to deny my resolution, must disprove all of my arguments, for even if only one stands out, the resolution stands out too. Clarification: > Event: caused entity, or existent entity. > Cause: a cause of an entity B is a necessary event A which…

    Against

    • PrefaceNote I didn't directly respond to round 3, as I wasn't sure if they were just additional arguments. For this round I will address both mostly Pro's Round 3. Semantics *Sigh* So Pro is mixing and matching words to suit his needs. Pro never provided the definitions he was…
    • Preface:I flatly disagree with Pro that I need to disprove all of his arguments to defeat the resolution; I only need to show the resolution is unsound. Pro defined God as: "Singular Non-Contingent Essential Existence Uncaused Efficient First Cause"He needs to demonstrate all…
  16. 1666.

    The Bible does not still condemn homosexuality

    For

    • The title is quite self-explanatory. I (pro) challenge Con to a debate on whether or not the Bible still does (or if it ever did) condemn homosexuals.
    • Before I begin, I must thank you for staying. For most people I attempt to create a debate with, they leave the 2nd or 3rd round. There are almost always "dominant" and "submissive" partners. Except with the reference, Professor Mary Tolbert was making, it was primarily for…

    Against

    • Hello, Pro! I'll be contending that Bible always has condemned homosexuals. I eagerly await your first argument.
    • I sadly know of a few Christians who support the death penalty for homosexuals after an uninformed reading of Leviticus, so it was probably wise to include it. I'm also grateful that you cited sources this time, because I was unsure of what to say at some points in Round 2. You…
  17. 1667.

    The Bible supports the concept of astral projection

    For

    • Thank you con; I will now bring up some arguments to support my claim that astral projection can be defended by the Bible.*Note: I will be citing verses from the Douay-Rheims Bible, as it is one of the earliest translations of the Bible.*Background; implausibility of astral…
    • Astral Projection: "the act of separating the astral body (spirit or consciousness) from the physical body and its journey into the universe. "[1] Bible: "The Bible is a collection of 66 books written by about 40 authors, in three different languages, on three different…

    Against

    • I accept, however this is only my second debate on this site.
  18. 1668.

    Religion is primarily a form of escapism

    For

    • Religion is, by definition 'the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power; God(s)'. While in this debate I am not discounting the personal beliefs of others, as everyone is entitled to their beliefs, I am simply saying I believe them to be wrong. Not only this,…
    • Thank you. Arguments will start in round two.

    Against

    • Points carry over.
    • You stated that there is no afterlife. Can you prove that to be true? I can't and I am a Christian, you see neither of us can prove anything. Religion is not for comfort. In fact, here is an example of religion not being all warm and fuzzy. The Muslim religion worships a god…
  19. 1669.

    Christianity is based on sound logic

    For

    • Oh no man. You got me all wrong my point wasn't that God made the Big Bang but instead it was proving the fact that the Bible could have possibly been correct about the creation of earth. Now second if God is real (which I believe) then you have to remember that in the bible it…
    • Christianity is a correct religion and though many try to disprove I believe that I can prove it. First of all you need to understand that it is your job to hear me out. Now first of all in order to prove that Christianity is a good religion we have to first get to the…

    Against

    • The Bible is not much of a credible source because its credibility is compromised by talking animals. Yes I agree, that verse may fall to be correct, but the verses following completely ruin your evidence. The story of Adam and Eve cannot exist because it leaves no room for…
    • My argument will be proving that there is not sufficient evidence of Christianity. You bear the burden of proof. Good luck.
  20. 1670.

    Free will can exist under God

    For

    • Okay, I had just wrote this big long thing, but I lost it all so I will simply write a very condensed version. Most of what you wrote is irrelevant. Look at the debate title: Free will can exist under God Galatians 5:13 You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But…
    • Free will: The ability to make your own choices, in such a way that is not controlled by God or another figure.God is referring to the christion God.I am arguing that free will can exist under the christian god.

    Against

    • Wow. You lost your entire big long thing? There"s a solution to that. Get Google docs. No matter what you type it saves it. You don"t have to do anything. OK onto business" I have looked at the debate title. Free will in ab-so-lu-te-ly no way possible can exist under god. Free…
    • Greetings! I hope that you are doing well and in the very best of spirits. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh here. This is just a mere copy and paste of a previous debate of "Free Will" I once previously posted a month or so ago in which shows that there's absolutely no free will…
  21. 1671.

    The Bible is mostly myth rather than history

    For

    • Hi Con! Thank you for taking your time to debate with me!!! Okay so first of all I gave the dictionary definition of Fable. I even clarified directly I that I mean to say the bible is false. It does in fact convey good morals though. It seems you are right in the fact that I…
    • Fable: 1. A short story, conveying a moral. 2. To tell fictitious tales. Yes I am arguing that the bible is very untrue if anyone needs more clarification. Acceptance, then arguments.

    Against

    • .. so I'm not allowed to introduce one of my topic? Because I believe that's what you did in saying that the bible is a fable. Also, my piece of evidence proves that what the bible says is correct. The charriots were caved in there by the waves. I would love to see any…
    • Now allow me to go on to my arguement: The Bible has historical evidence. In Exodus, Moses (with the help of God) parted the red sea so he and his men could walk across on dry land. The water then caved in and trapped the "bad guys". There is evidence of this miracle. .…
  22. 1672.

    The Bible is necessarily true because it is divinely inspired

    For

    • My opponent has debunked all of my arguments; I respectfully forfeit this debate.
    • God is infinite, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient. 1. Things on earth undergo change, movement. Everything which moves is moved by something else. This cycle continues on into the past. But, it cannot on infinitely because there would be no first mover seeing as there is…

    Against

    • Let's review what's at stake here: Pro contends that because the Christian God exists as described in the Bible, it is feasible that the Christian God could inspire human authors to write perfect truths in the form of the Bible. Con's argument is that Pro's reasoning is…
    • Thank you, THEBOMB, for you insightful arguments. Readers, voters, and Pro himself will remember that in round 2 I agreed that the Christian God is believed to have the maximal attributes listed by Pro, but since the integrity of the scriptures that lay out those attributes is…
  23. 1673.

    Judaism is objectively the most believable religion

    For

    • I will begin my final round with reinstating my argument for the authenticity of Judaism, and demonstrate that your "story" is no comparison. You see the thing is like this the Jews don't just have a text and claim something happened,they say that it happened to them, to the…
    • Thank you Mr. con for taking on this debate and shalom (peace) to you and to the whole world. i must preface my argument by saying that when i say Judaism i mean orthodox Judaism regardless which group in orthodoxy we all accept the authority of the bible and the Talmud, i…

    Against

    • Ok last round in brief and conclusion..Pro - "the anniversy of the exodus from Egypt every year (as an aside to show how great the celebration was when the holy temple stood in Jerusalem, part of the Passover celebration was the commandment to sacrifice a Pascal lamb (with…
    • shalom peace...Pro - "There is not a single orthodox Jew who will tell you that non-Jews don't have a share in the world to come on the contrary it says Clearly in the Talmud that righteous non-jews go to heaven (tractate Sanhedrin 90a and page 105a and more) so salvation for…
  24. 1674.

    The Bible is both illogical and immoral

    For

    • Con makes the claim that I have misunderstood and misinterpreted the bible, but I have to argue that he is the one who has made that error. He made the case that in the case of rape, it becomes the woman's option of whether or not to marry the rapist, but this is simply not…
    • I didn't know I needed to define right and wrong, I figured we all knew the difference, but OK. The standards of morality I will be using is our modern day understanding of right vs wrong. As to the bible verses I used I thought their immorality was apparent. Deuteronomy…

    Against

    • Remember that Pro's contention is that the Bible is both illogical AND immoral. In order to win this debate, he will have had to prove that the Bible is both. However, he has not proven that the Bible is either, especially proven in the fact that he has dropped several…
    • "I didn't know I needed to define right and wrong, I figured we all knew the difference, but OK."The problem is that people ascribe to different standards of morality. While I believe in objective truths, there are also subjective truths. By having you define your stance on…
  25. 1675.

    God exists as a real being

    For

    • U go first God is thee creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.
    • Ok yes yes. Conduct goes to Con. Heres my responses"So he concedes that the universe could have come without god..."NONONO! I did not. I said the set must be caused. It still needs a causer."No evidence given to suggest it's wrong... I hope Pro is still going to debate me. R"No…

    Against

    • Hello internet.Warm welcomes to both Pro and the audience. Anyways, I'll start off as Pro requested. Contention 1: We have no need for one.This argument goes as following:1. In order to prove there is a god, there must be a need for one in order to explain the mechanics of our…
    • When he challenged me, I expected a debate.
  26. 1676.

    God set humanity up for certain failure

    For

    • The Bible is without error, but humans are not. Humans have error, so that is where we need God and The Bible to guide us that is what you seem to be forgetting here. A person can reject all of it, but as long as that person comes back to the path, which is Christ, you can be…
    • The perfect parent does not effect a child will full free will and surrounded by temptation. God set us up for success but with success comes the chance of failure. If failure was not in life, what was the reason for Christs sacrifice up on the cross? There would be no need for…

    Against

    • >>The perfect parent does not effect a child will full free will and surrounded by temptation.<>God set us up for success but with success comes the chance of failure. If failure was not in life, what was the reason for Christs sacrifice up on the cross? <>There would be no…
    • First of all you don't really know if they understood good and evil. You are assuming something not in evidence. However, Man did not need to know good and evil. God would have taught him which is which in time. Since God gave them a choice---obey or disobey. That points to…
  27. 1677.

    The Bible's contradictions about God make its claims fraudulent

    For

    • PART 1 There"s, After all, No possible way that this god is "one". That"s according to the printed text of the bible. That thus proves that the god of the bible, Everything that this god stands for is false, Deceitful, Incorrect and wrong about god making the bible unsound and…
    • Wow. Can you give me one reason why I should even give a rats reareth endeth crapeth as to why I should even debate you when all the goop you fixed with your needle and thread that has 0% of nothing to do with what was stated in RD1 and instead you went on on some meaningless…

    Against

    • Simply put, There is God and there could possibly be many Gods, It all comes down to bias and everyone's beliefs honestly. I'll now go in depth on not only that, But the existence of God for confirmation of what I mentioned before hand. I won't too much focus exclusively on…
    • Pro forfeited the debate. How cute. You talk big sh-t to other people and when I check you, You run. Haha. Funny. Vote for me! :)
  28. 1678.

    The Bible is not a valid source of evidence

    For

    • In this debate I would be arguing that everything in the Bible is not true, and it is not a valid source of evidence. Do not forfeit No name calling No swearing Be respectful Have fun. Good luck.
    • Thank you con. I appreciate you being kind about it. Yes, I admit I have lost. I messed up the title. Ah well. You were a worthy opponent anyway :)

    Against

    • He quit! That's an automatic point in conduct for me.
    • What you guys need to realize is that I am con. My only goal is to disprove a part of the debate title which is: "Everything in the Bible is not true, and it is not a valid source of evidence. " In order for me to do that, all I have to do is prove merely one of the Bible's…
  29. 1679.

    Non-Christians cannot justify the laws of logic

    For

    • My argument is that non-Christians can't account for the laws of logic. They are secretley relying on Christinaity to make sense of these laws. All three rounds can be used for obejctions/rebuttals If you are younger than 18 don't bother.
    • It seems as though you have assumed for the purposes of this argument that the Christian God exists. Okay, let's roll with that. " I start with God's existence. If you don't, you're reduce to using rap lyrics to try and defeat your opponent. Which is pretty hilarious. "Pro…

    Against

    • I accept and await my opponent's opening argument.
    • Thank you, Hezekiah_Ahaz, for this stimulating debate. I wish you the best. You make a good point that my abductive argument accounting for the laws of logic is quite bad. That's actually kind of the point because even though it's so bad, it's still better than your abductive…
  30. 1680.

    Belief in God's existence is rationally justified

    For

    • Con wants me to give him an example of something existing outside of space and time. Thus I will do so. Think of an idea. Or a thought. It is not bound by space or time because it was immaterial. You can't measure an idea by how much it weighs or how long it is. How it exists…
    • 2ndLawofTD: Con "Now CalTech Cosmologist Sean Carrol offers an interesting idea. What if there is no thermodynamic equilibrium?" 1.) This does not answer or prove anything. 2.) But however, there is thermodynamic equilibrium. So that argument does not apply here nor is it…

    Against

    • "Con wants me to give him an example of something existing outside of space and time. Thus I will do so. Think of an idea. Or a thought"I could have predicted this. Ideas are the products of minds and minds are the products of brains. "In philosophy, ideas are usually construed…
    • On god's eternality:Pro has still not made the existence of something outside of space and time coherent.God being immaterial, whatever that means, does not escape this problem. If it's the case that something exists at all, it exists in space and time. To say something exists…
  31. 1681.

    The doctrine of one way to heaven is wrong

    For

    • Alright amigo, let's look at a few incidences where Jesus said someone is saved, Luke 19:8-9: "But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, "Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four…
    • You know amigo, it is doctrines like this that make me wonder why I am a christian, then I say "hey, that isn't in the bible", well, from how you are describing Jesus, he sounds a lot different from the Jesus I read about when I read the New Testament, the Jesus you describe is…

    Against

    • It's amazing what the Bible can say when you don't read it. Luke 19:1-10 He entered Jericho and was passing through. And behold, there was a man named Zacchaeus. He was a chief tax collector and was rich. And he was seeking to see who Jesus was, but on account of the crowd he…
    • I guess there is no real argument to make in this round. It's not "the Jesus I describe". It's the Jesus the Bible describes. All my descriptions of Jesus are quoted directly from the Bible. As a Christian, I believe what the Bible says. What the Bible says is that God loves…
  32. 1682.

    The existence of atheists contradicts the concept of God

    For

    • "My opponent appears to have taken on the position of a literalist, fundamental Christian, in order to support his position, and while interesting, it does not accurately reflect the views of a majority of Christians. To start I will point out his assumptions about God, that I…
    • How interesting, an Atheist takes up this debate. I'm sure this will be an exciting one :) "F: God chooses to allow mankind to govern his own mind without forced influence. (Free Will) G: Benevolence is only obtained through pure freedom, as provided by God. H: Freedom of…

    Against

    • Let us examine the original position as layed out by my opponent. It is important to remain focused on the original intent of his position as the debate progresses, because I believe we are entering ground which my opponent negated in his original statement. Remember: "Make it…
    • My opponent appears to have taken on the position of a literalist, fundamental Christian, in order to support his position, and while interesting, it does not accurately reflect the views of a majority of Christians. To start I will point out his assumptions about God, that I…
  33. 1683.

    Christianity is inconsistent

    For

    • [this space intentionally left blank]
    • This will be my conclusion. In the next round, I will say, "This space intentionally left blank." That way Con and I will have an equal number of posts to make our arguments. ARGUMENT ONE Con appears to think that the precise timing of when Judaism became false is somehow…

    Against

    • ARGUMENT ONE "we can both agree that according to Christianity, the statements about perpetual sacrifices in the Old Testament were true" According to Christianity, the statements about perpetual sacrifices in the OT are false because Christ was the final sacrifice. This is…
    • To begin, yes I did mean to say that Christianity replaced Judaism at Jesus's death. FIRST ARGUMENT I am going to be clear and say that the moment Jesus died was when Judaism became false and Christianity became true. So, the first premise is false because at the instigation of…
  34. 1684.

    The historical Jesus Christ was a doomsday cult leader

    For

    • Crossan's series of 180s to model Christian originsCon disagrees with me that the celibacy is an indication of asceticism, claiming that "most historians attribute the idea of celibacy to the later Christian Church."Con also disagrees with my claim that the theory of his…
    • Too many arguments againI don't hold it against Con for introducing too many arguments into the debate, but I feel sore that I am accused of dropping arguments. I defended myself under the heading in Round 2, "Too many arguments." To explain further, such a debating approach is…

    Against

    • Thanks again, ApostateAbe. == Too many arguments == My opponent only seems to respond to the arguments that I draw his attention to. As such, I'm not going to extend my best arguments until the last round, since it's not my job to tell my opponent which of my arguments he needs…
    • Thanks for the quick reply ApostateAbe. == "Specious" sources == All of my opponents arguments seem to be ad hominems – he attacks my authors rather than what they had to say. The guy who keeps an in-depth, sourced, list of New Testament contradictions is a Geologist? This is…
  35. 1685.

    The existence of unnecessary suffering makes a perfect God impossible

    For

    • I understand. Because of this I ask that this debate be left tied by the voters, but tune in to our extension of this debate.
    • Arguments extended.

    Against

    • Thank You. and I ask the same of the voters to this debate, leave this a tie but stay tuned in!
    • I am so very sorry for the forfiet, a big snow storm caused the power to be out in half of my county for a few days.
  36. 1686.

    It is likely that a god or gods exist

    For

    • Arguments extend. My opponent concedes the debate to me.
    • My opponent graciously concedes the debate to me. Nevertheless, my opponent made a couple brief claims, so I feel compelled to answer them. In response to the Kalam Cosmological Argument, my opponent concedes that the universe had a cause of its existence. My opponent claims…

    Against

    • yyy
    • Xxx
  37. 1687.

    Jesus Christ is not God

    For

    • Thank you very much praying for me ^^ i praying back for you to find the true both of us, and im not an english man and im not claiming to be an excellent speaker/writer, but trust me i know english and i know the bible inside out. (also in hebrew for you). Anyway lets come…
    • Welcome Con, lets beginIn your introduction you said:1. Quran is written nearly 700 years after Jesus death.2.Quran claims Jesus never died and historical accounts claims He did.1 - its doesnt really matter whether its after 700 years or million years, becuase if God (as…

    Against

    • I have used a multitude of Biblical scripture to support the fact that Jesus claimed to be God. Some people like you are so concreted in their ways of viewing Jesus that they can't even gain the humility to learn. I want to also say that I am not doing 'backflips' with my…
    • I pray that your heart will be softened toward Jesus Christ as you do not currently trust Him as your Saviour. I can see that. Also, you need to spell correctly if you are going to use Biblical terms as it suggests you really don't know much about the Bible due to these errors.…
  38. 1688.

    Pauline Christianity is fundamentally flawed

    For

    • Starting with Romans 3, Yes the first few verses are talking about jews, but Romans 3:7 is not talking about jews, it does not say if there lie...it is in the singular, if my, and Paul who was talking is not a jew at this point. Pro is simply trying to whitewash the evident…
    • Romans 3:7 World English Bible For if the truth of God through my lie abounded to his glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? New International Version Someone might argue, "If my falsehood enhances God's truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned…

    Against

    • As I had percieved from the objection raised by Pro, the misunderstanding here is due to a lack of context. For simplicity's sake, I will use ESV and there is nothing peculiar about this version besides the convenience that I possess a printed version of it. In order to defend…
    • I will argue that the two verses you mentioned (Rom 3:7 & II Cor 11:5-10) do not show everything wrong with Pauline Christianity. Since you have not defined that, I will take the liberty to do so and it is just the teachings of the apostle Paul through the Gospels that he has…
  39. 1689.

    Religion is not the best way to achieve human goals

    For

    • "I would say that the first paragraph is fraught with assumptions that work toward your point without consideration of any alternatives" Not at all, look at my last sentence. Regarding my point about conscience. I am not saying that conscience is logical or that its not and I…
    • My argument starts by saying that most of us, even if unaware, define our goal in life to maximize our own well being. Note that when striving to maximize our well being, our conscience is also a factor, thus harming others is usually a bad strategy. Moreover our strategy for…

    Against

    • I would say that the first paragraph is fraught with assumptions that work toward your point without consideration of any alternatives. I would agree for the sake of the integrity of the debate that most of us in some way attempt to maximize our own well-being. However, your…
    • My computer's been restarting randomly, and I don't want to type for long just to end up with my arguments erased, so I can only offer a brief response to each argument. First off, bringing calculus into the equation isn't logical for this particular problem, because while…
  40. 1690.

    There is no proof that the Christian God exists

    For

    • Con has FF'd the 4th round, and as such has not given any responce on the stated points I made in my previous round. As this is my last round it means I can't respond to any replies on the points brought up, So all I will say is I hope Con enjoyed this debate and that people…
    • I thank Con for the third round and will answer his points to how why there has still not been proof of God. Good And Evil Like before, I still stand that evil is not simply the absence of good. Left, Right, Directions and Math are all different things that are used to measure…

    Against

    • I will address every front mentioned and provide stronger logic as it seems you don't yet understand. First do these things exist. Math Evil/neutral/good Time Directions of any kind like right or west The answer is no not at all. None of these things exist and I'll tell you…
    • Thank you for coming back to me now I would like to defend my front on evil is none existent. I know you accept my other ramifications, so where is the difference. Let me phrase it like this all evil has it's own justification and there for is a ideology no a factual existence,…
  41. 1691.

    God is not good

    For

    • It still is nto justifiable becouse he didnt create the people he killed.The only humans he created is Adam and Eve then they started to reproduce and create other humans.So by your logic its not justifiable becouse he dosent own any life or humans becouse he didnt create the…
    • Yes you are right God creates the rules and he creaated a rule that states "You shall not kill" yet he broke his own rule wich makes him bad.

    Against

    • A key part of Christianity and Judaism is that God is good. God's will is divine. I don't see how God not creating the people he killed is relevant at all. Just because some of God's actions do not agree with modern day culture does not make God evil. In fact, because God…
    • The rule only applied to humans. Humans are not supposed to kill other humans. It is okay if God does it.
  42. 1692.

    Governments should ban sponsorship of religious pilgrimages

    For

    • Why should government spend money, hard earned money in sponsoring pilgrimages when we have other problems to solve? Indeed, government should not sponsor it..Nigerian government who has been spending their money should indeed stop because they have other problems to solve
    • I will not cease to say, that personality of my own calibre has been mocked, i have been cornered at a spot by my co-debater for some certain reasons..my co- debater has committed fallacies in cost of this argumet. Let me start by one of the fallacy my co-debater committed.…

    Against

    • The opponent keeps states that my rebuttal has no argument; in that case, I would like to request you to read it over again, and then think; is that really an argument? The opponent has clearly ignored most of my arguments by saying that I have no argument, and I really do…
    • I would like to start with a statement: I have made my stance so clear, but if the opponent feels that he would not want to read the first few sentences of my previous argument, then I shall state it again: Governments should not end the sponsorship of pilgrimage. Now I would…
  43. 1693.

    Gay marriage is morally acceptable even within Christianity

    For

    • As for Paul, the fact that he was a great follower of Jesus does not mean that every opinion he had was the law of God. The fact that one part of the Bible written by a different author than the rest said his writing was directly inspired by God does not prove that it actually…
    • Everything you say here is good and reasonable. There is just one thing that you assume. You are assuming that every single thing in the Bible is God's will. Don't be offended by the following, this is just my point of view. Not everything in the Bible is a fact or a rule. Now,…

    Against

    • We are not debating whether or not the Bible is true; we are debating whether or not gay marriage is morally acceptable within Christianity. As Christians, we base our entire faith off of the Bible. Therefore, the debate is whether the Bible accepts gay marriage, whether it is…
    • You bring up good points. First, as to your point about divorce. I agree with you that it IS a sin, and I believe that the Church as a whole does not treat it as a sin, like they may treat other sins. I would say that this is hypocrisy on the part of many Christians. Now, our…
  44. 1694.

    Matter being eternal rules out the existence of God

    For

    • the absolutes are the proof, infinity can not end, if it ends its destruction, the absolutes determine this, like matter can only transform make an apple nothing.. matter is eternal, therefore time has no beginning as time is matter
    • m8, what no beginning and no end means if it is here, is that it didn't begin, and it wont end, as it can only transform, at no point can it be destroyed(from something to nothing) infinity has a beginning.. eternal means no beginning, and no end matter is not a concept, you…

    Against

    • My opponent continues to assert without a shred of evidence that the universe and matter are eternal. He/she denies the theory of The Big Bang without any sort of reasoning. My opponent also failed to address the point I made in the opening round which is that even if both of…
    • My opponent continues to assert without a shred of evidence that the universe and matter are eternal. He/she denies the theory of The Big Bang without any sort of reasoning. My opponent also failed to address the point I made in the opening round which is that even if both of…
  45. 1695.

    Religion is harmful to human society

    For

    • :)Religion harms human society for a variety of reasons. One of the biggest reasons is that it causes war and acts of terrorism among extremists throughout the world. People of many religions also use some of their beliefs, which are usually unable to be proven or disproven, to…
    • RulesRound 1: Rules and position clarification. Round 2: Opening statements (Limited to outlining facts)Round 3,4: Evidence/Rebuttals. Round 5: Closing statementss (Limited to restating and summarizing evidence from rounds 3 and 4. You can also reiterate your opening statement.…

    Against

    • Extend all arguments.
    • Extend all arguments.
  46. 1696.

    Religious texts like the Bible amount to indoctrination

    For

    • Okay so my job is to prove that the Bible is used to brainwash. You so excellent defined brainwashing for me as, "pressurize (someone) into adopting radically different beliefs by using systematic and often forcible means." So now I have to show and convince you that the bible…
    • 1st round is accceptance, anyone that wants to seriously defend the Bible should accept.

    Against

    • Excellent choice of topic for a debate, I feel I will enjoy this.My opponent has the burden of proof in this debate.My opponent has to prove that the bible is brainwashing people to win this debate.For those interested, brainwashing is defined as: 'pressurize (someone) into…
    • My opponent states thus:'In the beginning of the debate I never specified whether the Bible had to brainwash directly or indirectly.' This is inherently untrue, as when he made the debate he called it: 'The Bible is Brainwash.' This is obviously incredibly broken English, but…
  47. 1697.

    Orthodox and Catholic Christianity are fundamentally different religions

    For

    • I hope my opponent can post his rebuttals in the last round.
    • 1) The Bible is a poorly written document with huge flaws regarding morality and a lot of contradictions[1]Because our moral standards changed in the last 2000 years, apologists started claiming the Bible can't be taken literally. It is now widely believed the Bible is not…

    Against

    • My argument is that Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy are not substantially different enough in fundamental beliefs to be called different religions. First of all, both religions accept the same documents as scripture. Both churches recognize the 66 books of the main biblical…
    • I have decided to debate this topic with you. I do not believe that the fundamental differences between Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy are great enough for one to conclude that they are different religions.
  48. 1698.

    Baptism of the Holy Spirit is an experience not guaranteed by faith in Jesus

    For

    • First Position: The Baptism of the Holy Spirit is a spiritual experience with external evidence not just an internal transformation. Point 1: The two primary expressions for the giving of the Spirit have to do with the way water affects something, pointing to an experiential…

    Against

    • I'll concede. I didn't notice that someone limited the reply to 1,000 characters. I typed a reply, and the first two paragraphs took up 1,000 characters. In fact, if you'll count up, this concession took over 200 by itself.
    • Conceded when I noticed that I was to respond to a 3,000+ character opening statement with a 1,000 character reply. LOL! Shoulda noticed "what was up" before agreeing. Maybe will try it again on a level playing field and see how it goes.
  49. 1699.

    The Bible contains no significant contradictions

    For

    • it's possible that it means "all sins are forgiveable, except for unrepentant sins". there's no reason this is contradictory just because it's self evident. sometimes things need to be said. most people just say we don't now what the unforgiveable sin is. that doesn't mean it's…
    • the only one's i predict you might find, as trivial details, like how many people were at a place, or the color of something. or things that are too vague to mean anything, "our God is a venegful God" "our God is a merciful God". anything else as far as i know, has reasonable…

    Against

    • As I argued in the first round, it is ludicrous to state that blasphemy against the Spirit refers to an unrepentant sin. Blasphemy is to speak against a holy being. I can say, "the Holy Spirit is stupid," and I can mean it. I can then later change my mind and repent. Therefore,…
    • My opponent has forfeited Round 2. I shall let my previous argument stand, and I look forward to reading her rebuttal in round 3.
  50. 1700.

    Religion should be eliminated in the United States

    For

    • My argument has been made.
    • My argument has been made.

    Against

    • So basically ISIS! I mean right?! They are trying to come to the US and make us communists, take our religions and income. The US was taken over by the English in hopes for freedom of religion! So it would be stupid to stop the reason we came to what we now know as the United…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.