Discussly

Religion Debate Topics — page 21

3,675 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 21 of 74
  1. 1001.

    Does the Christian God exist

    For

    • The thing I cant understand is why you push the blame to god? Yes you can quesiton him why for this case why the child was taken away from the parent but dont you see that this was the work of the anti christ? And for your point on medicine,yes I agree our scientific and…
    • I"d like to draw your attention to 3 miracles:the miracle of lanciano,the staircase of saint joseph and the incorruptable bodies of certain saints. The miracle of lanciano is a eucharistic miracle, purported to have occured in the eighth century in lanciano itally. In a…

    Against

    • Yes, i think if you were to ask any parent that lost a child, they would question the existence of God with more scrutiny after you mention those, ummmm, miracles? You are relying far too much on faith to drive your points emotionally. Just remind me, how did god create Eve?…
    • Walk through a Pediatric Oncology ward, there is your answer. If you are still not convinced then I suggest you looking into a scientific practice called genetics.
  2. 1002.

    America should return to Christianity as its founding principle

    For

    • I believe that America should go back to Christianity. Students are learning about evolution, the big bang, and other lies. Rarely do you ever learn about Christianity in Public School. The democrats are trying to change the Pledge of Allegiance, because of the "one nation…

    Against

    • vote me!
    • Extend all arguments
  3. 1003.

    Jesus is the Jewish Messiah

    For

    • I will argue for how Jesus is the Jewish Messiah within the Scriptures and other Jewish writings. We will conduct a series of debates on the deity of Jesus Christ. I will first note some vital details on the sources i will use before i begin. The Septuagint is a translation of…
    • First off, most of these verses are not prophecies concering Christ. Some are and Jesus fulfilled them all, below is a list.Taking on the sins of others: no one can take on the sins of others: Deuteronomy 24:16, Exodus 32:30-35, Ezekiel 18:1-4, 20-24; 26-27 Deuteronmy 24:16 has…

    Against

    • Again, I'd like re-extend my offer to debate this topic with my opponent or anyone else.I'd also like to mention that I've accepted to take on another debate with Pro on the topic: "The Septuagint is more accurate and closer than the Masoretic text to the originals"It can be…
    • Looks like Pro has F.F. If he or anyone else would like to debate this (or similar) topic, just send me a challenge.VOTE CON!Apendix and random stuff:More on "Omnis Traductor Traditor" - and the problems with translations:Earlier I mentioned the concept of "Omnis Traductor…
  4. 1004.

    The Christian God is more likely than not to exist

    For

    • Con states that God is the greatest, but the greatest is subjective. The philosopher Immanuel Kant in his work "Critique of Pure Reason" states that existence is not dependent on attributes (1). Furthermore, the Scriptures state that God is infinite not because of attributes,…
    • This debate will not precisely focus on providing evidence for God's existence, but establishing the philosophical groundwork for why God is likely to exist. I won't be using the Ontological, Cosmological, moral, or Intelligent design arguments. I'm going to be intellectually…

    Against

    • Objections: None Arguments from Substance-Mode RelationThis argument is mainly based upon substance-mode relationships. A substance here is not a scientific substance, but a philosophical one; one which requires one and only one substance to conceive. Modes are matter that…
    • Okay, so I've been talking to people on DDo, and they have, apparently, provided me a list of "good" judges, who hopefully, would vote from a rational perspective, without any prejudices, on such a controversial issue.With this said, let us move onto the debate present at hand…
  5. 1005.

    Jesus did not change the Sabbath to Sunday

    For

    • My opponent has made a incorrect statement. "Jesus and Moses expressed the Sabbath Day was the seventh day, Sunday" First of all,the seventh day in the Jewish calender was today's Saturday.And as I said before the sabbath was made on the seventh-day. Now that doesn't conclude…
    • Well what's your argument?i presume you have nothing to debate about

    Against

    • "Jesus and Moses expressed the Sabbath Day was the seventh day, Sunday"First of all,the seventh day in the Jewish calender was today's Saturday. And as I said before the sabbath was made on the seventh-day. Now that doesn't conclude that Sabbath is a Jewish day. Because before…
    • Seeing as we are using the Bible as our source here, I will commence my argument. First, I will attack my opponent's arguments.Jesus didn't change the sabbath in the bible.He actually worshiped on that say.Yes, Jesus did worship on that day. The Ten Commandments…
  6. 1006.

    God created the Earth

    For

    • But all things have to be created.And yes they are life to refute your 1st argument. And I was told by an evolutionist that life can only come from life. So who created the atmosphere? Where did it come from? Nowhere? Great statement. So now tell me where the atmosphere came…
    • The proof that backs evolution is horrible. The very beginning is flawed. For example, the theory of evolution, states that life can only come from life. Yet, where did it all start? The con must explain why evolution's beginning is valid. May the best man win.

    Against

    • Obviously not. "I was told by an evolutionist that life can only come from life"Don't believe everything you hear. If I say "bats are potatoes", does that make it true? "So who created the atmosphere? "Nobody created the atmosphere. The atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen,…
    • I'm happy to have the opportunity to debate this. "The theory of evolution, states that life can only come from life."I would like to see Pro's proof that the theory of evolution states that only life can come from life. Obviously life started somewhere. I will now explain the…
  7. 1007.

    Atheists have no justification for preaching atheism

    For

    • On the point of definition, "exhortation" is "the act or process of exhorting," http://www.thefreedictionary.com... -- exactly as I used the word. Con may be thinking of "extortion" rather than "exhortation." I needed a word meaning "a vigorous advocacy made without giving…
    • I did indeed make the statement, in Forum, and I'm pleased to have Con challenge me on it. In the Forums, people seem to often forget that this is a debate site. I agree with Con's definition of atheism. I am an atheist, and have defended the atheist position in a number of…

    Against

    • I accept my opponent' definitions (though let me remind readers that to exhort is not exhortation, ie a criminal offense, but exhortation) and thank him for the debate. Here's to a good one. First, some foundations. In my opponent's original quote, he says that theists think…
    • "RoyLatham: Atheism, The one thing more obnoxious than a religious person preaching is an atheist preaching. The religious people have an excuse; they think they are saving souls. Atheists have no excuse." I would like to challenge RoyLatham on the statement that atheists have…
  8. 1008.

    Religion has been a tragic mistake in human history

    For

    • I understand. I extend my arguments then.
    • RULES: NO SOURCES! I want this to completely come from you based on your own philosophical views There will be profanity There were be no trolling No attacking eachother Enjoy the debate and Thank eachother for the debate in the last round Religion Is a Tragic Misstep in Human…

    Against

    • I'm really sorry about this - I am literally within the first ten minutes of having joined this site, and obviously did not pay enough attention to what I was signing up for. On this topic especially, I am far too strongly on the 'for' side to even begin to compose an argument.…
  9. 1009.

    Jesus is not God

    For

    • This is my first argument and like the most.. because i have never seen someone comes and gives me simple clear plain answer - is jesus said (hebrow/greek) " I AM GOD/ I AM GOD ALMIGHTY/AM GOD AND THERE IS NO GOD BESIDE ME etc... Jesus in his entire ministry NEVER uttered this…
    • Quran 25:63 When the ignorant people behave insolently towards them, they say, "Peace to you". PEACE TO YOU! :D

    Against

    • My reply was way more than 10,000 characters, so I have to shorten it way down, which means I have to delete half of what I was replying to of yours. I will mainly be replying to most of your points but i don't have enough characters left to bracket your comments and reply…
    • http://www.youtube.com... http://www.islamweb.net... Frogs are holy in Islam, their croak gives glory to Allah Revelation 16;13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false…
  10. 1010.

    Christian teaching should condemn same-sex relationships

    For

    • Aww shucks...<3 Naw man, I'm just a guy simply offering what I know and the rest is up to us to dialogue on. But I appreciate the comment, bro :D What I mean by "Heaven and Hell in major world religions" is the references the Holy Scriptures of God make to represent the end…
    • Hello hello to my dear friend Danmurphy789! I would be more than happy to take this debate. Just a heads up, I will be arguing my position using a logical/common sensical/scientific approach as well as Biblical references to support my stance. Personally, I have objections to…

    Against

    • Okay this is like my first debate, I go to a Christian School and we take apologetics next year and I'm just trying to get a head start on everyone else, but I can't win this XD. You're an awesome debater dude! but I forfeit, but I want to ask what do you mean by when heaven…
    • Tell me what you think. Should LGBT people be condemned for what they can't help? Or how they feel? If you believe they should be condemned to hell, tell me why
  11. 1011.

    Radical Christian evangelists are harmful to America

    For

    • Well my Friend I wold like to say that your first 2 paragraphs look to what we are debating about today weather or not they are bad for America now I am saying something SHOULD be done, but not imparitive you have to see everyone will agree with me and vote me up cause i show…
    • 1. As for your First point I some what agree with you that a group speaking there mind is no bad. Now what you need to do sir is resarch Fred Phelps, he was the ran that was amongst the first to start protest against soldiers as well as against gay people. Now this is how it is…

    Against

    • What debate are you watching? You've only won the "I can't spell" debate. You have consistently failed to prove how these people are bad for America and why protesting and the like are BAD FOR A COUNTRY OF FREE IDEAS!!! You can say "I've proven they're bad for America" as many…
    • The people are not important in this debate. Period. This is a debate over whether or not we are allowed to silence opinions and ideas we don't like. Sorry "my good sir" that's not how this country works. Everyone, regardless of race, creed, religion, or any other…
  12. 1012.

    Christians are increasingly under attack in Western societies

    For

    • I would like to extend my thanks to Ruac for his response. It seems I have given the impression that I am opposed to Christianity, which I am not. In my experience, Christians are usually gentle, benign people that are kind to animals and give generously to charity. However,…
    • Thank you for your compliment, ruac, and I would like to reciprocate by stating that I admire your willingness to express your views with such honesty and conviction. Here's a true story: I remember one time in the pub an old German chap I know, who is always complaining about…

    Against

    • God does not hate anybody. He will, however, punish those who are gay. People are not born gay. It isn't natural. Do you see homosexual dogs? Cats? No. Homosexuality is sick and wrong and therefore should be abolished. _________________________________ You also go on to say…
    • First of all, I would like to thank my opponent for responding ______________________________________________________ Now, you said that Christian parents who teach their children that God created the world should be criticized, and not listen to scientists who tell them…
  13. 1013.

    Belief in God and evolution can coexist

    For

    • Yea
    • Sadly I don't know how to officially forfeit lol.

    Against

    • Ok. Umm, I guess that's chill.
  14. 1014.

    Religion is a positive force in society

    For

    • Thank you - this has been an enjoyable debate. Disclaimer: In round 3 I claimed that Con dropped all of my advantages, 1-7. This was misleading since Con still had opportunity to respond to them in round 3 and 4, my apologies. I will defend my advantages, and refute the sparse…
    • I thank Con for presenting his case. I shall extend my rd 2 advantages, and counter his case. I look forward to his response. ALL ADVANTAGES OF RELIGION CONCEDED I thank CON for conceding all of my advantages. Con makes no attempt to refute or rebut a single one of them. Please…

    Against

    • Your claims: 1. Charity Giving to ANY religious organizations is considered charity (even church). The current statistic of 65% (religious) and 56% (non-religious) people donating must be reconsidered now that we know 73% of all religious donations feed their own congregations.…
    • Thanks! I hope you're doing well. I'll get right to it. Religion has no doubt done good things in the world; I suggest, however, that the shadow of religion will always reach farther than it's deeds. Casualties of religion: 1. Division in the name of religion. Religion divides…
  15. 1015.

    Baptism is when a believer becomes a Christian

    For

    • You said: 1st I want to make one comment I don't want to get into the Greek because I am not as good at it. My response: Andy Jesus said in John 17 twice Father I do not pray for these alone, but for all those who would believe in me through their word, that they may be one as…
    • Round 3 Sword master Response: Andy again thanks for your participation in this debate from the bottom of my heart I feel honored to have this debate. Now I would like to take what you said peace by peace and give it the honor due it. You said 1."Would you agree that a saving…

    Against

    • "My response: Andy Jesus said in John 17 twice Father I do not pray for these alone, but for all those who would believe in me through their word, that they may be one as I am in you and you are in me, that they may be one in us that the world may believe that you sent me.…
    • 1st I want to make one comment I don't want to get into the greek because I am not as good at it. ? 1 In Acts 2:37 Were these people saved at this point? No. ? 2 Did they have saving faith in verse 37? Kind of. ? 3 And in verse 47 were these people saved at this point? Yes. ? 4…
  16. 1016.

    The apostolic doctrine is the only true Christian doctrine

    For

    • Ephesians 4:4-6 There is one body, and one spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. One body Proverbs 6:16-19….He that soweth discord among…
    • First round is preety much for acceptance/introducing your religion/ clarification however you are welcome to state your case early.Clarification on what i am proposing. I am proposing that the apostolic doctrine is the one true faith. I am mainly looking to debate a catholic…

    Against

    • Finish.
    • Due to update related errors, I couldn't post my argument last round. My schedule is now heating up, so maybe it was for the best. I concede this debate.
  17. 1017.

    Belief in evolution is compatible with Christianity

    For

    • To be a Christian and believe in evolution is completely logical. The theory of evolution does not deny that God created the Earth. As I mentioned earlier, the theory that all of life"s common ancestor was bacteria is a more recent theory that was not Darwin"s theory of…
    • This debate will be limited to evolution as an explanation of the diversity of animals. Evolution as an explanation for the beginning of life on Earth is a different debate that being honest, I have very little knowledge on. This debate was spurred after I saw someone say that…

    Against

    • You say "Evolution as an explanation of the diversity of animals" Merriam-Webster Diversity: the quality or state of being composed of many different elements or types Merriam-Webster Synonyms, Types: type, kind, sort, nature, description, character mean a number of individuals…
    • To be Christian and believe in evolution is to ignore what the Holy Spirit recorded in the scriptures, as well as external evidence that can be observed in nature. In being a Christian is to know there is only one and true living God (Jeremiah 10.10 & 1 John 5.20), to believe…
  18. 1018.

    It is logical to believe God exists

    For

    • Let me begin by stating my religious beliefs. I do not follow any specific religion but am I devout believer in God. God is an abstract force and cannot be proved by any means of text. The Bible, Koran, etc. are all man written texts with stories that are either myths or…

    Against

    • Whoooo
    • Would anyone want to debate this with me? ...
  19. 1019.

    Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible

    For

    • QuestionsBefore I start my argument I will answer some of the questions that my adversary asked:"Will Wikipedia be considered a legitimate source?"Sure, you can use Wikipedia, but not wikis, i.e. "WikiIslam"."Will I be required to use "pbuh" after the names of any major…
    • Hello, in this debate I will argue that Prophet Muhammad was indeed mentioned in the Bible, the BoP will be on me, but my adversary has to refute my argument.

    Against

    • Thank you Valtin, for posting this debate. I gladly accept your offer. I accept your conditions. For this debate I am going to use various online resources, the Bible, the Qu'ran, and any Hadiths (only sahih) if necessary. Also, a few questions that I would like for you to…
    • For the last round I will summarize my arguments and refute any new claims by Pro. Deuteronomy 18:18 The Gospels affirm that Christ is indeed the Prophet AND the Messiah. The OT never states that the Messiah and the Prophet are two distinct figures. Matthew 21:11 - "The crowds…
  20. 1020.

    Atheists are kinder than Christians

    For

    • "An Atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An atheist believes that deed must be done instead of prayer said. An atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanished, war eliminated."…

    Against

    • So basically, my opponent could come up with absolutly NO rebutal towards my arguments. This could have been a good debate perhaps, if it were a debate at all. Thanks for reading!
    • Obviously my opponent couldn't think of any rebuttal to my argument, and there is nothing further for me to address at this time.
  21. 1021.

    Christians should say the Pledge of Allegiance

    For

    • Can you explain to me why Christians have petioned the Government to make kids say the Pledge of Alliegance as shown by George H W Bush and others?
    • The Bible commands Christians to be good citizens of the country in which they live. He has set civil governments over all people. In Romans 13:1, the apostle Paul stated that every Christian should "be subject unto the higher powers." However, we understand that our foremost…

    Against

    • Pro says that "we pledge allegiance to our flag (or to the nation it represents) only to the extent that the civil government does not require us to disobey God"s laws, either deliberately or inadvertently (Acts 5:29)." This, however, is not true allegiance. Pledging your…
    • Firstly: whether or not this debate is entitled 'Christians should not say the pledge' or 'Christians should say the pledge' does not, in fact, change the scope of the debate. I would still be arguing against Christians saying the pledge and 1970vu would still be arguing…
  22. 1022.

    God exists only as a myth

    For

    • We could go round, and round over specific cases, but the issue that underpins all the pro-God arguments is the claim that natural does not include all of the existence. As, for instance, natural could only include the physical universe, or physical universe + some non-physical…
    • Here is a summary of points that my opponent made: 1. To have true justice, God and after life are required to exist 2. That "God can bring His will about, and if required, make everyone else to bow to His will" 3. Transcending nature does not limit God to enter nature (for…

    Against

    • Rebuttal: We have a subjective view of what natural is. Someone like God has an objective view of what is natural. You have your definition of certain terms and I have mine. As stated before, the general accepted view is that God is supernatural in that He has abilities that…
    • Rebuttals: In point #3, the conclusion doesn't follow from the premise. Premise: God surpasses nature in that He has supernatural attributes Premise: Supernatural attributes allows God to enter into nature. It is SUPER after all. Conclusion: God can transcend and partake of…
  23. 1023.

    Religion is not a major cause of war

    For

    • To define the debate, this is all about debating if religion is the real reason for war or not. Non religious people would blame religion from the violence recorded in history like Crusaders and Islamic wars. As a Pro, I will give proofs that religion is not the cause of war.…
    • Round 5 finished. My points are just two: Statistics and Religion vs Power: Power are more priority for wars, forefronting religion.

    Against

    • Religions is the result, is the cause and the very nature of war. xoxo
    • To begin a war is to have faith you will win. This is religion.
  24. 1024.

    Jesus never said anything about homosexuality or transgender identity

    For

    • Verse references can be found at the bottom of this reply You said, "...I should have the right, playing by [H]is [God's] rules in reverse have every right to murder you." No you do not: we are not bound by the Old Testament Law. Even if we were, it would be a rightly deserved…
    • You are wrong in the sense that I do not believe in anything in regards to the Old Testament. As I have mentioned multiple times, the events described in the Old Testament did transpire. The law of the Old Testament is what we are no longer bound by. The flood and Noah's ark…

    Against

    • "You are wrong in the sense that I do not believe in anything in regards to the Old Testament." Oh no, I am absolutely 100% correct in stating that because you as a supposed christian, in which there is no such a thing (you did not even pay any attention to the video posted,…
    • Since you believe in nothing in regards to the OT, watch this... http://www.youtube.com... - Atheist Debates: But that's the Old Testament! Oh ab-so-lu-te-ly "God commands us to hate homosexuals" You proved absolutely nothing in your previous response because you are a truly…
  25. 1025.

    Religion is a problem for society

    For

    • the problem within religious ignorance is that people who are religious quite often aren't able or haven't read the bible. the priest is the one who reads it for them. this allows them to have a lot of power over them. and as a rebuttal to your point, it wasn't so much the rich…
    • While I do agree that it won't instantly make people smarter, religion tends to make people ignorant. To support this I will quote a few bible verses that would show religious ignorance. Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace,…

    Against

    • 1. Your first point was a big issue in history, but it just extends my example. The nobles and the clergy worked together. The clergy let the uneducated peasants believe that the king has the divine law. Today it is not really an issue, as the church doesn't have control over…
    • These verses you quoted support my view more than yours. Ignorant or lazy people will read both quotes and think "Well, Jesus supported violence and god wants that slaves obey their masters.". People who question this will try to find a deeper meaning. The "fire" Jesus wanted…
  26. 1026.

    The Abrahamic God cannot be proven not to exist

    For

    • Thre is no way to prove that the Abrahamic God such as the one referenced in Christian, Judaic, and Islamic religions does not exist.
    • So what you're saying is because the book that humans wrote about a "God" contradicts itself in some places, that the argument is flawed and thus incorrect. I believe this is the fallacy fallacy. As this is my final round i would like to thank my opponent for accepting this…

    Against

    • I do not believe that this is the fallacy fallacy, as portrayals can be misleading and wrong if they have contradictions in them. As this is also my final round, I would like to thank my opponent for providing a fair argument. Although it may not look like it in my arguments, I…
    • No. I am saying that the Abrahamic God, as portrayed, is false due to my argument. I would like to emphasize the words "as portrayed." According to your original argument you specifically said those words. There is a way to prove the existence of the portrayal false, as I have…
  27. 1027.

    No one deserves to go to Hell

    For

    • My argument will center around the following syllogism: P1: Hell is only justified if we have the free will to choose good from bad. P2: We do not have the free will to choose good from bad. C: Hell is unjustified. P1: Hell is only justified with free will The common…
    • The full resolution is as it reads, no one deserves to go to hell,..not even Hitler. Burden of Proof:Pro is to affirming, using Logic and Reasoning, that no one deserves to go to hell. Con is to prove, using Logic and Reasoning, that people can deserve to go to hell. This means…

    Against

    • The proposition I will be refuting is this: "No one is deserving of going to Hell". I not only agree to my opponent's first four statements (and of course the last two), but feel they will only serve to solidly construct a convincing argument for me. As the first round is for…
    • Thank you, 000ike, for your response. I have agreed with my opponent on every point he's made up until the third and final round, where he contradicts his previous statements at nearly every syllable. There are a few points I could go into detail about. For instance, he claims…
  28. 1028.

    The Bible does not make being gay wrong

    For

    • Well if what I posted as abominations according to the bible ex. "Unclean things (Lev. 7:21). Leviticus 11:7 And the pig, because it parts the hoof and is cloven-footed but does not chew the cud, is unclean to you." How is it considered "prioritise" when they clearly neglect,…
    • Now the most common reason and explanation Catholics use for why being Gay isn't okay is the famous verse of Leviticus which states, Lev. 18:22 "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination." (NASB) "You shall not lie with a male as with a…

    Against

    • Well then your argument is irrelevant because we are talking about the bible and it's references to homosexuality not how different people interpret and follow the bible. Also: "Here is another argument for your "Christian" viewpoint argument. Do Christians need to obey the Old…
    • Christians don't neglect to follow certain verses, they simply prioritise them in a way which is easier to follow. It's also against Christianity to force someone to do or change something. In his entire life Jesus never forced anyone to do or change anything and a true…
  29. 1029.

    Scientific evidence supports the existence of the Abrahamic God

    For

    • Con fails to show how the actual Hebrew means 24-hour days. "Evening and morning" is understood by Semitic speakers as figurative (1). "The opponent states that I cannot proclaim that he exists, or trees exist, or that this website exists via science. Albeit I cannot proclaim…
    • I am in no way saying that an error was committed, but that yom can refer to a vague period of time. My opponent's error is that he argues that Genesis doesn't mention a periods of indefinite periods of time when i gave a source to support that the time length of a day in…

    Against

    • In this round, I will present rebuttals, conclude and present voting issues.5R1RC: The Concept of Scientific Evidence: The opponent is literally arguing not against the resolution, but against scientific evidence. The motion of this debate asks, and the opponent has not…
    • He says that he is no way saying that a mistake was made, thus accepting the Geneva Bible in which it solely meant 24-hour days. He then contradicts himself by saying that he is arguing that the word "yom" in this case is being argued as a certain period of years. Firstly, this…
  30. 1030.

    The God of Christianity exists

    For

    • 1. How Old is Christianity? While Christianity is different from Judaism due to the New Testament, the Old Testament is still apart of it. It is the same God, and religion, the Old testament is apart of Christianity, so to say Christianity didn't exist then is false.…
    • While I have many oppositions to the statement "there are no arguments to date that sufficiently imply that a belief in God is rational and there are many reasons to doubt that the God of Christianity exists". While this is false and there are many rational theories out there,…

    Against

    • "You state that there were many religions before Christianity. However this is not actually true." Finnish Paganism, Canaanite Religion, Atenism, Minoan Religion, Mithraism, Manichaeism, Tengriism, Ashurism, Vedism, Olmec. Just to name a few. "Christianity is a religion that is…
    • There have been no arguments to date that sufficiently imply that a belief in God is rational and there are many reasons to doubt that the God of Christianity exists. It is the case that the claim of 1 religion, more than 1 religion, or no religion is true. It can't be the case…
  31. 1031.

    A God truly exists

    For

    • Forfeit AAHHHHHHH
    • I concede. . . . . . I can't write things anymore. Honestly, I need to train with Tholht.

    Against

    • Fini.
    • No shame in it. To be clear, If I saw or was provided for evidence for your God the only way my tune would change would be to try to convince people that we still must somehow fight against him anyway. No one deserves eternal damnation. We as a society have to learn how to…
  32. 1032.

    Gay Christians are not true followers of God

    For

    • First I want to start out with the defiotion of the Bible: The sacred writening of what tells us how to live our lives as a follower of God and how to enter the Kingdom of God. http://dictionary.reference.com... Easily said, In the Bible its says that if you kill someone its…
    • I am a strong beliver that gay "Christians" are not true true followers of God. If you are agianst my views I highly suggest that you join in the debate.Rules:Please try not to forfeit Be Nice over others viewsFirst round if for accpetioncorrect grammar and spellingEnjoy! :)

    Against

    • I am happy to debate this with my opponent, but I will remind him, that when he asks for correct s&g, that he utilizes it himself. I myself am religious, and I believe that little reliable evidence exists for why homosexuals can't follow god. Besides the two quotes that my…
    • Alright, I'm down for another session of crushing bettabreeder. JK!
  33. 1033.

    The book of Genesis should not be read literally

    For

    • I am not going to debate anymore because as I said, I meant literal.
    • No, but it was nice hearing from you. However, most people define 'literal' as in taking something word for word instead of from a literary perspective. For example, the phrase 'open your eyes' can be taken literally and from a literary perspective. Literal: Raising the…

    Against

    • ConceptEagle, I think that I understand now and that you and I are on the "same page," if I might speak non-literally. Since we are able to move on in the debate, let's do so. Certain Christians can be quite literal in understanding the days of Genesis in the 24-hour fashion,…
    • Well, it had sounded as though you were intending literal to mean taking the days of Genesis 1 in the 24-hour sense of the term. Thus, I offered some arguments in favor of that view. Did you want to respond to any of those arguments? Thanks, TS
  34. 1034.

    A world without religion is better than a world with religion

    For

    • If you are suggesting that a person's relationship with God (whether you believe there is a God or not is irrelevant in this argument as the subject is "the world with or without religion, which is better..") is better than one where a person has no relationship with God then…
    • Your thesis contains the word "better" please define that word. As it is right now, I have no way of defining what you mean by "better". The statement "A world without religion is better than a world with religion" is declarative. Why do you say a world without religion is…

    Against

    • Pardon? I'm not exactly sure I just understood what you said. What I'm asking you to debate with me about is : a world without religion better than one with religion. Its pretty simple.
    • Is a world without religion better than a world with religion? Do we need religion? Debate with me why you think atheism is best.
  35. 1035.

    God probably does not exist

    For

    • I have repeatedly stated that it is impossible to prove God's existence or non-existence. We can only determine which is more likely. The available evidence gives two options: 1. God exists. 2. God does not exist. As God's existence is an unnecessary assumption to explain the…
    • Be concise and stick to the point. Got it. Carl Sagan once said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." If I tell you that Santa Claus exists, I have to prove it. If you explore the entire Arctic and find no trace of a toy factory, you must assume I was wrong.…

    Against

    • Thankyou for presenting your case. You claim that God's existence in unnecessary to explain the evidence so you can use O.R. . . . I am really confused by what you are trying to do here. "In science, Occam's razor is used as a heuristic (general guiding rule or an observation)…
    • I have been waiting for pro to present his position supporting "Based on the available evidence, God probably doesn't exist."Please present your position.I will respond to your position in round 4.Remember, as PRO you need to present a position, that I (CON) try to refute.So…
  36. 1036.

    Sola scriptura is not a coherent doctrine

    For

    • YOU SAY: "Christianity claims that putting your faith into Jesus to simply mediate salvation on your behalf after dying on the cross so that it may be so, is all that you need to have Salvation. No added book would ever change that in any circumstance, unless it refutes the…
    • When I am talking about Sola Scriptura I am talking about the belief that the Bible alone contains all of the truths of Christianity and there is nothing additional to it that we need to know in terms of faith or salvation. God's revelation is entirely in the Bible. Basically,…

    Against

    • To your first response, we know this because Christians, ever since the creation of the Bible, considered what you're considering now. Scholars always look into other writings but again they are either useless in the sense of S.S. (for one to find salvation; even the apocrypha…
    • I apologize but it seems as though the word Salvation is becoming completely over complicated to no longer hold its definition. Salvation is the saving of the soul from sin and its consequences. Christianity claims that putting your faith into Jesus to simply mediate salvation…
  37. 1037.

    Federal drug bans conflict with Catholic teaching

    For

    • My opponent seems to have forfeited. I'm disappointed; nevertheless, I will build on my defense of the resolution.According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "Excessive intervention by the state can threaten personal freedom and initiative." (1) I contend that a federal…
    • Thank you for accepting. :D The federal government, according to the Church, should not encroach on a person's freedom, which includes that of using drugs: "[M]en should act on their own judgment, enjoying and making use of a responsible freedom, not driven by coercion but…

    Against

    • I accept :)
  38. 1038.

    There is more evidence that God does not exist than that he does

    For

    • Thanks very much for your well written and well thought out opening argument. But I do question one thing - you mentioned "There is great design in the universe". I assume that by "great" you mean large and complex, and not that the design itself is good or perfect? Because it…
    • Quite simple, really. Although there is no definitive evidence to disprove the existence of God, there is enough to assume that it is unlikely. On the flipside, there is not even the smallest amount of tangible evidence that God does exist.

    Against

    • And of course, welcome to debate. org :) Pro argues that there is no evidence for the existence of God. I disagree. I think its simply just he who will not accept any. I will today only give one argument for the existence of God, which is the teleological argument. The…
    • Pro argues that a infinite number of universes exist, and that there was no "first" universe. As I said, this is absurd. There have to exist a uncaused being which caused the absolute first universe of which all the other universes came from, because if the cause of the…
  39. 1039.

    The Bible does not condone recreational drinking of alcohol

    For

    • i do not have to debate that the bible forbids the consumption of alcohol. just that it's not clear enough that it's okay to drink when the water is sanitary. those verses do not say drinking is a good thing, all we can deduce was that it was permissible.
    • your verses in support of drinking do not say it's okay to drink if the water is sanitary. it merely say it can make one's heart merry and to drink it with gladdness. i never said the bible doesn;t allow for drinking alcohol. it forbids drunkenness, but it doesn't mean it…

    Against

    • My opponent claims that the verses I proposed as evidence are invalid, because they do not say it is okay to drink alcohol if the water is sanitary enough to drink. The verses also do not address if it is okay to drink whenever you have died your hair red and are in the middle…
    • My opponent claims that since wine was ONLY drunk because the water was oftentimes unsanitary, then every other passage in the bible referring to drinking is irrelevant. Notice I emphasized ONLY in a sarcastic fashion. While this was a reason people in biblical times drank…
  40. 1040.

    A fundamental misunderstanding of church-state separation exists

    For

    • "You can't point to Jefferson as the origniator of the establishment clause here. " I most certainly can! Let me know if you tire of being wrong. It was THOMAS JEFFERSON who drafted and co-authored a bill for religious freedom which he began in 1777, and was completed in 1779…
    • "First of all, I'd like to point out that it is really entirely irrelevant as to what Jefferson thought the First Amendment meant, at least in the appeal to authority that you're trying to give, because James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights (http://www.jmu.edu......). Your…

    Against

    • First of all, you're citing Wikipedia as your source. Please use real sources. Second, even if you accept the source, it's for the VIRGINIA Bill of Rights. Not the U. S. Bill of Rights. These are tow different documents, and they can have completely different meanings,…
    • Well, I found the Jefferson stuff very interesting. I especially liked the date. 1802. Do you know what year James Madison completeld the Bill of Rights? 1789. It was ratified in 1791. More than a decade before that letter. You can't point to Jefferson as the origniator of the…
  41. 1041.

    Christian doctrine does not hinder scientific discovery

    For

    • As I've been surfing around Debate.org, I've come to realize that a popular notion is pervasive among the atheistic community on this site. Many atheists believe that Christianity hinders scientific discovery. Granted, this notion has become popular thanks to our education in…

    Against

    • Extend my ArgumentsPro has not presented any rebuttals, my arguments stand.
    • Extend my arguments.
  42. 1042.

    The God of the Bible does not exist

    For

    • Le boo. I know ever so scary. My opponent is jumping out of his seat because after all, It__Is__Me knows nothing beyond his shallow perch of a squabbling airhead hockey table on fire. That being well said and known by both parties, Let it also be known that since my opponent…
    • Naturally my dogmatic opponent It__Is__Me, But who is that really? Neatly avoided everything that was put forward to him in RD2. So therefore, Why should this debate continue when his bible was proven to be fake and fraudulent in which case is the ---ONLY--- outlet that he has…

    Against

    • Backwardseden's ad-hominem attacksI was disappointed to see that Backwardseden starts his closing statement with nearly 350 words of name-calling and ad-hominem attacks. Whilst it's easy to see why this should cost him points for conduct (calling your opponent a 'dildo' is…
    • Let's start by making one thing very clear; sticking to the rules that your opponent laid out in their opening statement cannot be dismissed as a "miserable excuse". If backwardseden doesn't like the way I neatly avoided some of his arguments then maybe he should have put some…
  43. 1043.

    Christianity is the true religion

    For

    • Ah, well what I would like to say is to go against the fact that you stated the fact that the light made God. Then again you said that sunlight created the light and was also made by the sun and the fact that God is fake. For that reason yo us said god was not real. Yes you…
    • Well, don't get me wrong but I also like science alot. Though what I'm asking you is that, do you have any proof that well God didn't exist. I', asking you then what had started Earth and all those cool space things. And those things are still remained as a mystery and even…

    Against

    • First of all did i ever say that i think that Buddha was real? no. I think that heir values are great but i don't believe in it it's self. You are right when you said that i can not prove the big bang but the reason why i believe it is that it is a guess based upon the facts…
    • Like i said religion is a speculation, it can not be proved wrong. i ask you to give any type of valid proof that it exists. jesus is no more a true prophet then Abram, they are figure heads yes but like so many other people that claimed to be divine (alexander the great,…
  44. 1044.

    Evolution is compatible with Christianity

    For

    • Let's have a look at the two accounts of Genesis. Genesis 1:19-27 (King James Version): 19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. 20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in…
    • You bring up some great questions. You wrote: "Well, here is a quote from the Bible. 'the Lord God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. Genesis 2:7.' WELL, HERE IT SAYS GOD MADE THE…

    Against

    • Thank you for putting so much time and effort into this debate. You have been very respectful, and you have clear and logical thinking. I apologise that my arguments are quite short. Yes, some parts of the Bible are literal. You argued that the part about the creation of Adam…
    • I have to admit your point about taking the Bible literally is correct. Some parts of the Bible are metaphors and are not to be taken scientifically. However, I would like to point out that, as the Bible says, humans were made to govern the Earth, and are very special. Would…
  45. 1045.

    The Bible contains factual inaccuracies

    For

    • I have set up this debate in response to an exchange between Strider97 and I on an opinion thread [1]. I will be PRO; Strider97 will be CON. I want to make it very clear that I own 100% of the burden of proof; CON need only refute my arguments. Below is the actual claim being…
    • I thank CON for his third round arguments. Before getting to the arguments proper, I would like to thank CON for accepting this debate; I have thoroughly enjoyed it, and I hope CON has as well. The Six Main Arguments 1) Joseph's Father Regarding CON's point that Jechonias was…

    Against

    • I have thoroughly enjoyed this debate round, just as much as I hope the PRO has. I would like to thank the PRO for his decency in this debate round as well as for inviting me. So far in this debate the only thing I have discovered is that the KJV is not translated as well as I…
    • Also, I would beg the forgiveness of the PRO, as I have responded late in this round. (I"ve been very busy) Secondly, truth regardless of how it translates into language is truth none the less. If we are going to continue we must agree on this point. 1) Mathew 1, "This is the…
  46. 1046.

    Religious faith justifies social inequality

    For

    • Here"s how I run things" if there is the slightest hint of you inventing excuses from something in which you clearly know nothing about, especially when its the subject in which you claim to professing you have knowledge upon, namely this one, and you really don"t, and yet you…
    • Taken from http://churchandstate.org.uk... Justification for inequality A simple and honest study of our world"s theocracies (and countries such as America where those issues are being debated) reveals how our holy texts are used to discriminate against women, LGBTs, and…

    Against

    • The reason I have decided to debate with you on this is due to the language used in it. You are using a lot of "our", "we" "us" when you fail to realize only a small amount of people discriminate based off of their holy books. The first issue I would like to address is this:…
    • "It is so painfully obvious that you made up things as you went along. I do not take to kindly to that. Not ever. Bye." Made up things as I went along? I am Catholic, with all due respect, I know more about my religion than you do. Anywho, I ask that you provide a valid…
  47. 1047.

    Jesus could not be the messiah because of his two conflicting genealogies

    For

    • As my opponent agreed that both genealogies could not be used in round 3. The fact that the 2 lines could not be trace back to David on the father's line is enough. Look at Ezra 2 The following came up from the towns of Tel Melah, Tel Harsha, Kerub, Addon and Immer, but they…
    • I would like to add an explanation that would make more sense. As you probably know, the Jewish People only hold the Hebrew Bible (Old testament) as true. They are still waiting for the messiah, but reject Jesus as the messiah. They reason why they refuse Jesus is because he…

    Against

    • "As my opponent agreed that both genealogies could not be used in round 3. The fact that the 2 lines could not be trace back to David on the father's line is enough." No it is not. Your arguing that the faulty genealogies in Mathew and Luke prove that he wasn't the messiah.…
    • "I would like to add an explanation that would make more sense. As you probably know, the Jewish People only hold the Hebrew Bible (Old testament) as true. They are still waiting for the messiah, but reject Jesus as the messiah. They reason why they refuse Jesus is because he…
  48. 1048.

    Rock music should be allowed inside churches

    For

    • Rock music is not a bad thing to have in Church, it helps bring youth and more 'worldly people' in, and away from satan. It is a new time, and a new generation, and most people are no longer willing to simply sit and listen to all the consequences of religion, but more about…

    Against

    • Hello Torm. I have little to say, only that im looking forward to your reply. I understand people can be bussy and unable to make it on time. I hope to hear from you soon.
    • Hello. Welcome Torm and thankyou. I am greatfull that another christian accepted my topic. This allows us to speak peacafully about the bible and church without mockers interfeering. Worldly people are attracted to there own. You who are rich so will you gather many of the…
  49. 1049.

    The Islamic God exists

    For

    • OUTLINE:- 1. THE RELIGION OF ISLAM 2. THE MESSAGE OF ISLAM 3.LINK 4. CONCLUSION THE RELIGION OF ISLAM The first thing that one should know and clearly understand about Islam is what the word "Islam" itself means. The religion of Islam is not named after a person as in the case…
    • In mathematics there is a theory known as "Theory of Probability". If you have two options, out of which one is right, and one is wrong, the chances that you will chose the right one is half, i.e. one out of the two will be correct. You have 50% chances of being correct.…

    Against

    • Round 3 OutlineI. IntroII. Other religionsIII. Incorrect predictionsIV. Jaded statistics on opponent's partV. SummaryVI. LinksI. I must admit, my opponent took a creative route to make her argument. Using probability to show that many of the predictions within the Islamic…
    • OutlineI. Definition of GodII. Evolutionary psychology and superstitionIII. DragonsIV. Occam's razorV. SummaryVI. SourcesI. Definition of GodDefinition of God via dictionary "1. Goda. A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe,…
  50. 1050.

    Christianity has done more harm than good

    For

    • Apparently since Christianity can be used as evil everything must be evil. I'm not going to waste time attempting to respond to this. Also, My oppenent has failed to show how Christianity has helped mankind in any way, shape or form. Bottom line is that when a fictional book…
    • He argued that, "many biblical verses will not have relevance in this debate because of differences in interpretation. " This makes no sense, though. Because Bible verses can and have been interpreted in different ways people have and still do use these interpretations to…

    Against

    • Yet, it is true that one does not need Christianity or any religion to commit horrible crimes, but this has nothing to do with the debate. However, this has everything to do with the debate. Under my opponent's logic, anything can be regarded as a force of evil. For example,…
    • I also would apologize to my opponent, as I thought this debate would have less tangible points with facts to support it, instead of making points from the facts. I believe there was a misunderstanding with the "respond quickly", I was hoping that more points would be brought…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.