Religion Debate Topics for Students — page 26
2,660 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1251.
God's wrath is a response to human defiance
For
- As I said, you are defying God and He proves His wrath by your death.I don't have to prove anything, God proves Himself. All you are doing is causing God's wrath to build againt you for defying Him. He loves you and He does not want to pour out His wrath on you, but you are…
- The proof is your own death. If you won't believe God's wrath is in response to your evil, your eternal death is sure and you will never know anything other than God's wrath......even though you deny it now. God loves you.I hope you find this to be more than intersting.Your…
Against
- The debate is already over because PRO has not fulfilled his burden of proof and has dropped my two main contentions. Extend them. I will now respond to each of his arguments. PRO states, "As I said, you are defying God and He proves His wrath by your death."I never said that I…
- As I said in my opening piece, and as Pro has not disputed, he must be able to prove God in order to prove that God's wrath will come upon atheists and agnostics. If God doesn't exist or possibly does not exist, his wrath also doesn't exist or possibly does not exist. If that…
- 1252.
Islam is the most successful religion in history
For
- By defination, Islam is "Total submission" in this case to the creator of all things "GOD". It is the most successful way of life mankind will ever know. It is the only way proposed by the architect of our existance. It is a fact that in the world, there is no law which…
Against
- xx
- xx
- 1253.
God's love is for Israel alone, not all humanity
For
- Secondly, I'd like the reader to know that CON contradicted many statements he made; the biggest contradiction was what he posted in R4 and he stated, "Pro is assuming something that I didn't make. God didn't change in the New Testament. He didn't all of a sudden decide: "Hey!…
- "I also wasn't happy with Pro's use of the N word referring to black people, even though Pro used it subtly and may be without poor intentions;" Actually the "N" word is in the Bible, so if it's in the Bible, it should be a problem with me using it. All nigger means is dark or…
Against
- But I am exhausted and I feel that this debate has gone longer that it should. I'll try (if I can) to keep my arguments short for the sake of the reader (and my sanity). Debate Objection It appears that Pro didn't like my objection to him using the N word, and Pro's use of too…
- Debate Objection I find it inexcusable that Pro continues to use the N words to refer to African Americans. While the KJV Bible uses these words, Pro should note that the KJV Bible was written in the 17th century, and at that time these words were the terms used to refer to…
- 1254.
The Bible is a reliable historical source
For
- Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Love, humans have love, we…
- A lot these prophecies are still to come just assuming they are from the Old Testament doesn't mean it hasn't happened yet. Also a few others have been result from the failing of the Jewish people not going forward with God's plan. It cannot happen if the correct people…
Against
- So you basically say they are not happened yet. What if they never happen? Have you considered the other side of the coin? These assumptions can be made by a 12 year old school kid anyways. "One day this river will dry!". "One day we will all go back to earth we came from" Pro,…
- Sir if i am blinded, you are in a coma. since you stated some sources from bible that appears to be truely happened according to history, let me tell you there are thousands of predictions where bible fails. I cant write them all down because of 10k characters max yet I want…
- 1255.
The Bible contains many logical contradictions
For
- First off I apologize if I was unclear and I will try to do a better job of being understandable. Now for your first point if man was perfect how can he make mistakes? That is a complete logical fallacy, it says they were "good" not perfect, and even if it did no perfect person…
- I will site parts in the bible that show blatant logical fallacies. God created imperfect man then blamed them for being imperfect even though he made them that way plus also makes evil and sin yet hates when we do them. " Colossians 1:16 For by him were all things created,…
Against
- Sometimes the Bible doesn't clarify things. It leaves the reader to decipher it himself. When God created evil, he didn't want us to use it. That is correct. But God lets us choose what we want to do. If there wasn't evil, what point would good be? We'd be forced beings. And, I…
- I accept. To start. Man wasn't always imperfect. You are incorrect there. If man were imperfect, God would not have called him "good," as he said in Genesis. Your next argument. You are correct in saying that God created evil. According to the Bible, God created everything.…
- 1256.
God can be proven to determine objective morality
For
- Thank you for thoughts and views. I am at a good disadvantage with your compared information and abilities to debate. I do not have a rebuttal. Maybe someone else can provide a better argument. Thank you much for the experience. Maybe we can debate another day.
- I will also assume for this that god does so exist. And so, what you are saying is that, If I could prove that god does (MMR), then that would essentially prove it to be true. But as many would say "He works in mysterious ways" as through punishment and reward for your moral…
Against
- Thank you, comasense, for debating. It has been a pleasure, and I hope to debate again some time. As a formality, I will note that Pro has conceded the debate. Thank you again, comasense, and thank you to anyone following this debate ~BastiatForever
- As we move into the rebuttal stage, I'd just like to establish a few agreed-upon points between both Pro and con - For the purpose of this debate, God exists - God's morality must be determined by MMR. Now on to rebuttals of my opponents arguments- Rebuttal 1 "God Works in…
- 1257.
The Bible is sexist
For
- And now, my final argument! Don't worry, your last round was good, but you did put more detail and effort into this one, which I am grateful for. This round, I'm going to give a rebuttal, then a conclusion, which is a quick summary of how the debate went from my perspective,…
- Thank you for your counter-argument, Con. I've read it, and you have said nothing offensive or rude, so don't worry about that. Your response to my Genesis argument was very thoughtful, but there are some flaws in your logic. You say that this isn't sexist because God gave an…
Against
- Thank you so much for this debate- it was wonderful to be doing this with you, and I'm sad to see it finished. I'm hoping we can do more debates together afterward. I've never seen what you've done in terms of a conclusion, but I'd like to thank you for your honest points and…
- Hello again! Thank you so much for your thoughtful response and insights. I'll do my best to respond to them now. I'm sorry if my answer last time was a little rushed- I was running short on time and didn't elaborate on a lot of my points, leading to some confusion. I hope this…
- 1258.
Religion remains relevant in the modern world
For
- Yes, religion was built off of explaining the occurrences of natural events. Everyone knows that part of it, but it was also built off of a faith of an afterlife and heaven. Morals were based off religion, not humans. This is true in the US Amendments and any other law or rule.…
- All though religion, especially Christianity, has been thrown under the bus quite a lot lately, religion is still evident and still relevant, although people have drifted from it. Morals come from religion and religious beliefs and America was built off of Christianity.…
Against
- Morals come from what humans think is right and wrong about the world around them. Religion is what humans try to use to enforce their morals. They try to use the images of "God" and "Heaven" to invoke their morals. But what ends up happening in some cases is they force the…
- Is religion still relevant in the modern day (21st Century)? I am looking for any reasonable (non extremist) religious person. Of any religion. Christians, Jews, Muslims, anyone. Debate Me! I believe that a lot of the things said in most religious teachings are irrelevant in…
- 1259.
The Latter-day Saints church is not racist
For
- I will be arguing that Latter-day saints aren't racist.
- Thank you for a good debate con! ---Rebuttals--- "PRO begins by saying that my sources bash Mormonism" As CON stated I said that the sources bash Mormonism. I was referring to BOTH of the sources CON left at the bottom. I was hoping that CON would infer that both meant two. I…
Against
- It's a well-known fact that the Church of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) have racist tendencies that stretch back to the religion's founder, Joseph Smith. Native Americans and Africans, for instance, are viewed in the Book of Mormon as "Lamanites." "And he had caused the cursing…
- I genuinely hope it will be both informative and interesting for the reader. PRO begins his final retort by claiming that he wasn't calling in to question my quotes, but my sources. I sourced the websites because THAT is where I received the quotes. Since he doesn't have a…
- 1260.
There is strong evidence for God's existence
For
- Just to be perfectly clear, I am NOT arguing that I have 100% proof that God exists. It should be clear to everybody that there is just no 100% proof either way. It would be naive and arrogant to say otherwise. I will be arguing that I have evidence (or grounds for belief) of…
- This is a new theory I have recently discovered and am excited to put it to the test. I am confident by reviewing his debate record that he can come up with a good opposing argument, and provide me with some helpful, positive feedback. Opening Arguments My argument will be…
Against
- My opponent forfeited...
- My opponent forfeited...
- 1261.
Christianity is a form of therapy for learned helplessness
For
- I'll be damned. I did misspell it. :) Essentially learned helplessness is a mental state where a person has been conditioned to believe that they can't change their situation. Suppose that a baby elephant was tied to a stake which it couldn't pull out of the ground. During it's…
- In this debate I'm going to argue that Christianity, as describe in the synoptic Gospels is more of a therapy for learned helplessness than a religion. Or at least that's the point of be religion.
Against
- Learned Helplessness vs Christianity I will accept Pro's example of Learned Helplessness with the tethered elephant. It will be interesting to see how Pro can demonstrate that this scenario can be paralleled with the crux of Christianity - (that is to say where Christianity has…
- Spur of the moment decision to debate this, mostly out of curiosity as to what Pro's line of argument is going to be! I would just like to stake a claim to winning the vote for spelling and grammar from the outset, seeing as the instigator has misspelled the word "helplessness"…
- 1262.
The Bible contains internal contradictions
For
- How about these? How orderly were things created? #1: Step-by-step. The only discrepancy is that there is no Sun or Moon or stars on the first three "days." #2: God fixes things up as he goes. The first man is lonely, and is not satisfied with animals. God finally creates a…
- Since many "prophets" who wrote in the Bible, there are also many contradictions. For example, Which first--beasts or man? GEN 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and…
Against
- It seems my opponent has droped every last one of his round 1 arguments, so I guess they are refuted to his satisfaction? Vote Con. How orderly were things created? Very orderly in the pre-Adamic era, not so orderly with Adam and Eve - two separate events, hence, no…
- Which first--beasts or man? GEN 1:25-26 is discussing the pre-adamic race before God created Adam and Eve; this explains where Cain got his wife, whom he was afraid would kill him when made a fugitive in the earth, the rise of a city in just two generations after Adam, and how…
- 1263.
Christians do not truly follow Christ or the Bible
For
- https://www.google.com...Or we could ask did God change His Sabbath day? Exo_20:8, Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Exo_20:10, But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy…
- Jer_4:22, For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge. Sottish means STUPID! How can a stupid religion called Christianty allegally based on the…
Against
- So did you just change the question?
- Wait what?
- 1264.
Belief in God, Jesus, and the Bible is nonsensical
For
- God: Specifically the Christian God. Jesus: Christ's Prophet. Bible: Christ's Holy book. Nonsense: Wrong, not true, making no sense. Pro will argue that a majority of God, Jesus and the Bible are nonsensical. Con will argue that a majority of God, Jesus and the Bible are true.…
- 'The Big Bang's description is similar to 4 verses of the Bible! Woah! The Bible is true, God made the universe!' How ridiculous is that. In Jedd's book, he says that talking snakes are real, eating apples are bad and him, as the Flying Spaghetti Monster's prophet, went without…
Against
- Pro's definition of nonsense: Wrong, not true, making no sense. Argument 1) "God is nonsensical" Kalam Argument Whatever begins to exist has a cause; The universe began to exist; Therefore: The universe has a cause. From the conclusion of the initial syllogism, he appends a…
- There are certain arguments proposed to make evolution happen. Transposition Broad-scale evolution holds that a single-cell organism can eventually develop into a human through natural processes. Unique genetic features called transposons have been introduced as knock-down…
- 1265.
The Christian God exists
For
- Closing Points: Grace be to you, through Jesus. Bless God for He knows every star, and knows every planet, and names them Bless God for the chance to be being and the astonishing odds. Bless God for your temple for you have equal partner. Bless God for the nature and atonement…
- The main issue is this and I will keep it short because Con forfeited the last round. There is little proof for that my God exists like all other religions except one small difference. My God sent his only son down to Earth. A Jewish peasant that was here and gone like a…
Against
- Well pro has offered nothing that affirms the resolution so I shall just make some brief points.There being a universe: Noll Hpothesis"A type of hypothesis used in statistics that proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations. The null…
- I accept and decline to give arguments first.
- 1266.
Scripture forbids Christmas trees
For
- Lindsay, Jesus may have created the New Covenant, but Old Testament rulings (that weren't disputed within the New Testament itself) still abide. Otherwise, why do Christians still honor the Ten Commandments? Also, idoltry and the worship of other gods are strictly forbidden…
- Biblical scripture expressly forbids the use of Christmas Trees. So, why is it okay for Christians to directly violate scripture, especially in the name of honoring the birth of Jesus Christ? Here is the specific verse: Jeremiah 10: 1-9 1 Hear ye the word which the Lord…
Against
- I had to lose last round because I didn't have internet access. Regardless, I stand by what I said, and feel no need to rebuttle any of your statements based on the fact that Christ hadn't come to Earth when the Old Testament was written. No offense, but it defeats your entire…
- I will not make this long. I will simply disprove your statement, and probably win this debate in one round. You claim that "Scripture forbids Christmas Trees" and you back your information with an excerpt from Jeremiah. Jeremiah was one of the 5 books of major prophets,…
- 1267.
The Quran is the word of God
For
- Literary Challenge In the following verses Allah has challenged the whole of mankind to try and produce a single chapter like the Qur"an. This challenge, which has remained unmet, captivated the minds of the Arabs at the time of revelat-ion. "If you are in doubt of what We…
- I will be arguing that the Quran can only be desrcibed as the word of God, and there is no naturilistic explanation for it.
Against
- Extend refutations.
- Extend refutation.
- 1268.
God and science are mutually exclusive
For
- >> "Not true, exhibit A being Bjorn Lomborg and his "Skeptical Environmentalist"- put on trial by the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, and then found to not be in the wrong in any way by the Danish Government's Investigation." Ah - a singular example. I'm sure there…
- >> ""Oh, we were wrong before, that's how [insert phenomena here] works!". By the same argument, I could argue that when will science finally get their act together?" There's a difference between attributing a phenomenon to God and to Science. The difference is that science has…
Against
- "scientists don't put people on trial because they disagree with data -" Not true, exhibit A being Bjorn Lomborg and his "Skeptical Environmentalist"- put on trial by the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, and then found to not be in the wrong in any way by the Danish…
- Your argument is very good and very well thought out, and I thank you for that. However, I will argue that you are making a few basic false assumptions that lead your argument astray. ""Oh... we were wrong before - THAT's how god works!" How many times must this happen?" And…
- 1269.
Religion has a detrimental effect on the modern world
For
- My opponent and I have agreed to postpone this debate for another day. Please do not vote.
- Ladies and gentlemen, today I seek to show that religion has a detrimental effect to the modern world, that it has an overall negative impact, and the world would be better off with it disappearing today. I will argue that "detrimental" refers jut to a negative overall effect.…
Against
- Thanks for reading.
- My opponent and I have agreed to postpone this debate to be on another day. Please do not vote.
- 1270.
God exists and humans are without excuse for denying Him
For
- All of them. There is no other religion/worldview that can give an account for truth. They all have inconsistencies. Christianity is the only religion that can account for epistemology (how we know anything), ethics (right and wrong), and metaphysics (creation).
- The Christian God is the one and true God. Hopefully this debate will show how nobody can say anything to try and disprove God and will lead the unbeliever into repentance.
Against
- Please list ten of them and say what is wrong with each of them
- I am a, 100%, non-believer. Please list the other gods who are not true gods
- 1271.
Using the crucifix in Christianity is idolatry
For
- No round
- I didn't really expect my opponent's arguments to take the turns they have, and I applaud him for that. A really looking back at the debate, me and Crypto agree on a lot. We agree that having graven images isn't idolatry, even when they're in temples or worship ceremonies. We…
Against
- Introduction Wylted has essentially strawmanned my argument, overgeneralizing it and finding "contradictions" where there are none. The issue is complex, but not as much as Wylted makes it out to be. This debate does not come down to whether or not God changed his mind in terms…
- Introduction My opponent has conceded that not all graven images are idols which he implied via definition of "idol" and the use of the Scripture he presented in round 1. He also conceded that the use of the Crucifux is not idolatry in that the Crucifux itself is not…
- 1272.
The Bible contains fatal flaws
For
- (taken from The Secular Web)DT 6:5, MT 22:37, MK 12:30, LK 10:27 Love God. DT 6:13, PS 33:8, 34:9, 111:10, 115:13, 128:1, 147:11, PR 8:13, 16:6, 19:23, 22:4, IS 8:13, LK 12:5, 1PE 2:17 Fear God. 1JN 4:18 There is no fear in love.PR 30:5 Every word of God proves true. 1KI 22:23,…
- DO NOT EVER TRY TO CONVERT ME INTO YOUR EVIL HATEFUL RELIGION YOU F--CKIN PRICK. I Have read your bible. You have not. That is so obvious. You have been groomed, brainwashed and indoctrinated by those that wish to gain from you your well being because it makes them feel better…
Against
- To restate the rules: I need to show the the bible is not contradictory to itself. The instigators main qualms are: 1. PR 30:5 & 1KI 22:23, 2CH 18:22, JE 4:10, EZ 14:9 2TH 2:11-12;Suggesting God has lied 2. JE 8:8; Suggesting scribes have falsified the word of God 3. EZ 20:25;…
- For something to be called immoral, it must be contrary to some moral code. So what is this moral code that you are accusing God of breaking? If it"s just your own personal opinion on how people should act, it"s tantamount to you saying, "I don"t like what God did in the Old…
- 1273.
Jesus is not uniquely the Son of God; all people are
For
- You're absolutely right my quote was from John, and I apologize for that haphazard mistake. Regarding your quote, an assumption is made in the interpretation of Psalm 82 - that the "gods" that David is referring to "magistrates" among humans - even though that distinction is…
- I predicted you would use John, because that's the only place where Jesus being the only "Son" (ignore the capital "S", as the Aramaic language doesn't use capital letters). To refute your simple quote, I will use another, of a Gospel that was written much closer to the time of…
Against
- I agree with everything you have just said. You have proved that all humans who have received the breath of life from God are called "sons of God" [emphasis on the lower-case 's']. Another verse that complements this is Matthew 5:9, which states, "Blessed are the peacemakers,…
- Your quote is also from John...? Let"s start with a look at Psalm 82, the psalm that Jesus quotes in John 10:34. The Hebrew word translated "gods" in Psalm 82:6 is Elohim. It usually refers to the one true God, but it does have other uses. Psalm 82:1 says, "God presides in the…
- 1274.
Belief in the existence of God is justified
For
- Since my opponent forfeited my last round stands as is. Also I would like to make it clear my opponent if he returns must have a good solid base for the existence of logic before he moves on.
- Thanks to my opponent for taking this debate, When I refer to logic I refer to the general laws of logic such as noncontradiction( something can't be both sides of a dichotomy), law of identity(something is what it is, and is not what it is not), the law of excluded middle(a…
Against
- But not to waste time I would like to move quickly onto my arguments. What is this debate to be about? Well in the premise you stipulated not only the burdens you beloved me to have to carry but also that the existence of god should be "justified by good reasoning. " You then…
- 1275.
Christianity offers freedom of choice and free will to all
For
- Thanks to my opponent for the quick response. It is clear at this point that my opponent and I are talking at cross purposes about free will - which is hardly my fault, since he has not provided a definition for free will or even indicated what he means by it. He repeatedly…
- Thanks to my opponent for instigating this debate. First, allow me to have a gander at the resolution. It states 'Christianity Offers Freedom of Choice and Freewill to all'. In other words, on the Christian worldview, freedom of choice and free will are part of the package. Now…
Against
- 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. John 3:18* 1. Free will: Christianity does NOT offer free will. You are forced to choose either slavery to a…
- Okay... lets say, you were found guilty of... uh... lets say disobeying a law of some kind. Nothing really bad, violent or gruesome but you were found guilty. Now the penalty, for breaking that law, is that you will be tortured and then if you survive, be put to death. Suppose,…
- 1276.
Belief in the Bible is incompatible with modern morality
For
- Take my last argument as my closing statement.
- "First, how many commandments do you want?! Does the Bible have to lay out everything that you must and must not do? If so, the book would be 1000s of pages longer." No just wondering about priorities. "Joshua 6: You"re saying that because a tribe attacked a city its genocide?…
Against
- I'm sorry about the accidental forfeit... In fairness to you will not make any new arguments. Instead, I will just repeat my previous ones. 1. Mosaic law: Most of the verses provided were mosaic law. Those laws were meant for people before Christ. To further clarify you can…
- King James version: "You shall not covet your neighbors house; you shall not covet your neighbors wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbors." In my case I talked about some of the ten commandments and…
- 1277.
Religion is hindering societal progress
For
- I'm using far more logic than you, in actual fact. I'm pro-choice, not pro-abortion, but that is irrelevant to the to debate. I don't kill babies nor do I condone it, but a baby is different to a foetus. As a semi-sodomite myself (bisexual), I hope you know that your blatant…
- "Hey, moron" Backatcha, buddy. "I am not interested in what you think is progress" Fair enough, but I gave a definition and stated that I was saying religion holds society back from acheiving equality "I want an objective standard" The standard is a fair society where everyone…
Against
- Not only are you irrational and narcissistic, but now we see deluded and a sexual pervert. But you ran from the Q as I knew you would. You are unable to tell me why it is ok for you to harm a child but not me a sodkmite. Of course you cannot, for your position is hedonistic,…
- You are irrationally begging the question. Who are you to define harm for me? And why cannot I define sodomites as non-persons and kill them like you think it is fine to do the same to babies?
- 1278.
Evolution proves God exists
For
- I regret that we are out of time so I will not be able to offer and rejoinders to the next excellent set of ideas offered in rebuttal, but look forwards to reading them. Argument 1: Creation Con states: First of all, I disagree with my opponent when he says that God is…
- Below I will focus on misconceptions which Con has presented. Definitions God:God is defined to be the one that creates the universe. Con reinterprets this to mean only "created", or historically initiated the universe because "the creation of the universe is already done, it…
Against
- IntroductionFirst of all, I disagree with my opponent when he says that God is (typically) defined as the one who creates the universe. This is blatantly false. An example of this is the commonly used conclusion of the Kalam Cosmological Argument, being that the universe has a…
- IntroductionI thank UnknownOne for instigating this debate, as Con I will argue that it is not the case that evolution proves that God exist. Since the focus of this debate is evolution, I will only deal with the arguments presented by my opponent. To me it seems that the BoP…
- 1279.
The Bible has not been corrupted over time
For
- Okay, here's a list of definitions for corruption 1. dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery. "the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places" synonyms:dishonesty, unscrupulousness, double-dealing, fraud, fraudulence,…
- I just wanted a definition we could go by so we wouldn't have to go through semantics
Against
- Someone wrote: "I just wanted a definition we could go by so we wouldn't have to go through semantics" All of the words in my posts are real English words with specific and standard definitions: If you truly do not know the definition of any of the words in my posts, then you…
- Differences between various translations does not change the fact that mankind still has full access to the original scripture, exactly as God first revealed it. Also, you failed to provide as much as a single specific example of any supposed "corruption," so you lost. Thanks…
- 1280.
ISIS is anti-Islamic
For
- I extend arguments further.
- I extend all arguments.
Against
- A perceived corruption has precipitated schism and an attempted reformation. https://en.wikipedia.org...(Iraq)
- In the event of the defeat of ISIS we will know that they transgreesed the will of Allah. http://quran.com...
- 1281.
Heaven would contain many atheists
For
- Well this is productive. My argument didn't change and I went first so who plagiarized who? You made no argument for the con side of the claim. At best you tried to make them neutral, Which didn't do anything at all. You used ridiculous wording and even if I took every word…
- A reasonable God would not expect anything from anyone who didn't know their existence. If they judged at all, They would judge based off what they did in the world, Not how much "respect" they gave him. Your first argument is rejected.
Against
- Pro is clearly too preoccupied commenting on men's penis's to consider my argument properly. Nonetheless: 1) "Heaven would be filled with atheists". 2) Presupposing "God exists" 3) Presupposing "Heaven exists" I suggested that a God would respect those that respected his…
- Pro has in effect plagiarised my argument. Pro also misrepresented and misquoted. Pro should take more time and be more thorough. I clearly referred to "respect of creation".
- 1282.
Religion is a force for good in the world
For
- Religion motivates people to give to charity. do have any ideas other than the classic argument of no proof, it does not exist, or war argument. If so, it would really help!
Against
- Opponent's account has been closed, great.
- What I'm going to do is go through and construct a case of whether religion is a force for good in the world or not. I plan on stating what makes religion a threat in a general sense, the aspects of religion which make it the tool for division and fighting that it is, and…
- 1283.
Pentecostalism is the only true way to be saved
For
- As talked about with my opponent, I will be passing this round. Change of structure. :)
- It should have been stated in the beginning of the debate, that in order for Con to win, he must show us that in the Bible, it says you don't have to be filled with the Holy Spirit (speaking in tongues) to get into heaves, thus far, he has not done so. . Rebuttal #1 Exodus…
Against
- The Problem with interpretation My opponent dismisses my example as irrelevant, without fully understanding it's impact. Obviously modern day writing is extremely different then the much older text in the bible. The entire point is about how we as humans see things the way we…
- Just a quick setup fix, all the structure is correct with just the Pro and Con being reversed. My apologies on my mistake, it was copy/pasted from another debate in which I was Pro rather than Con. Framework Framework for this debate will be setting up specific burdens. Con"s…
- 1284.
The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is God
For
- I will, again, be using ESV unless stated otherwise. Rebuttals: Con's arguments can be summed up in three categories: (1)Jesus' humanness, because Jesus is weak and displays human limitations, how can he be God? (2)Jesus' title "son of man", because this title says Jesus is a…
- Hello everyone! I would like to thank Con for accepting the debate and would like to jump in it reminding you that I will be showing evidence that proves that according to the bible Jesus Christ is God. I will be using the ESV translation unless stated otherwise. My approach…
Against
- Pro's civility is commendable. He classified my points into broad categories, a ruse simply employed for the benefit of undermining my arguments, because of that I have chosen not to offer a rebuttal as i feel the scripture is clear on the issues and as such i shall let the…
- King James Bible Mark 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only..... Jesus states that not only is he subsurvient to his father,but he is not all knowing and as such he lacks the basic quality that only God can posses,full…
- 1285.
Christianity can be proven superior to other religions
For
- To make my final case, I shall point out scriptural truths that are contained in any other book to legitimize my continual and ever standing position that "God is a provable being, and that 5 religions are all wrong or 1 is right." Provable is not just tangible evidence of…
- Sad that Con did not respond. But I will carry on with the Point that ALL Religions are Wrong or ONE is right! There is the bumper sticker that says "COEXIST" and it is made up of various spiritual signs. It is with the belief that all ways lead to heaven and the concept is…
Against
- I am going to make this post short. The proposition of this debate is "Can Prove the Existence of God and the Validity of the Christian Faith over other Religious Systems" Pro has failed to logically prove the existence of the christian God. Pro has asserted false claims as…
- Sorry life sometimes happens. I guess I should do best to reply to the last 2 post by Pro. It is clear I am doing more than casting doubt. For example Pro asserted agreements on morality were more than similar conclusions that they were somehow indicative of a god. In contrast…
- 1286.
Christians must obey the teachings of Jesus
For
- I like the way u think. Yeah next we need to know whether the eye witnesses were accurately recorded. The debate is whether or not we need to obey Jesus, right? That's another long topic. If u want u can text me at 506 391 5973 and continue this discussion or start another…
- If Jesus died and rose again we know where death takes us. Interestingly secular and Christian historians generally agree that Jesus walked this earth and that many his followers had to die gruesome deaths because they were so sure that they walked and talked with him after he…
Against
- Reading back on it all, I do see that we have gone a bit off topic and that the topic "We must obey Jesus" is one that is worth exploring a lot further. I will not be able to do any more debating today, but I am interested in continuing this in a second topic.
- But do we know where death takes us? I could be wrong, but I don't think that Jesus ever shared with us where he went during his death or even what his death was like. All that we know is that he died and that he became alive again and that in itself is not proof that we…
- 1287.
The moral argument proves that God exists
For
- What this debate is about This debate is about whether or not the Moral Argument is sound and valid proof for God.Sound: In mathematical logic, a logical system has the soundness property if and only if its inference rules prove only formulas that are valid with respect to its…
- Extend my arguments. It is clear that izbo10 does not want to have a rational argument. G-d is defined as a transient being; nothing more. We are agnostic as to who that transcendent being is. All what the moral argument does is justify the belief in a transcendent being. If we…
Against
- The intellectual dishonesty runs deep with this one. Two huge pieces of intellectual dishonesty, trying to use the mathematical definition of sound rather then philosophical. Here is the philosophical definition. Sound= A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both…
- My opponent is clearly showing a bias towards god, that he will not grant to objective moral fairies. You can't start a discussion with someone who doesn't believe in what you are arguing for, and assume your position carries anymore weight then another alternative position.…
- 1288.
God is a human invention
For
- Hello and welcome,This is my first debate that I have set up on this site so I have much to learn. My history with religion was simple enough. I was raised a Southern Baptist and after High school I joined the military. After serving in the military I went to college and…
- Since I have limited space I will mainly respond to the arguments presented. The Jewish tradition of passing down information as a tradition is equivalent of many other religions that have passed stories down from parents to children. The fact that it was passed down with care…
Against
- Thank you for initiating the Debate. The 3000 character will be a challenge indeed. Awaiting your arguments.
- Rebuttal: Whether you believe the records about Christ or not is immaterial. It exists. Cosmological arguments necessitate that the "laws of nature" had to be suspended to explain how the universe began (a benzene molecule spinning without gravity? something out of nothing?).…
- 1289.
There is no good reason to believe in gods
For
- If you typed that argument on an iPad, YOU might be a god! Well done. Arguments refuted" Kalam P2 is an unsupported and unsupportable assertion. "Began to exist" is not defined in the context of the universe. There is no time at which the universe did not exist, so it can be…
- God claims have existed for all of recorded human history, yet no evidence has ever been presented that supports a god's existence. The various philosophical arguments are all based on bad premises. The monotheistic religions are based on translations of copies of copies of…
Against
- I would like to apologize in advance for the format. I'm using an iPod and haven't gotten used to it yet. So without further ado: Kalam Cosmological Argument P1) Everything that Begins to exist has a cause. P2) The Universe began to exist. C1) Therefore, the Universe has a…
- KCA You claim that P2 is unsupported, yet I supported it with the BVG Theorem. It's your burden to argue that an infinite universe exists. Plus, Hilbert's Hotel Paradox shows that an actual infinite is contradictory. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to be arguing that God…
- 1290.
A monotheistic, at least deistic God probably exists
For
- Okay, so very few Physicists would agree in the belief of a computer simulated universe. Also If the aliens were the "God" than they are supernatural because they transcend OUR naturality. Also, Advanced Technology would distinguishable from Magic because technology is…
- Let us start with the Cosmological argument: P1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause. P2. The Universe began to exist. P3/C. Therefore the Universe has a cause Is the first premise true? Well, let's take a look. Believing that something can pop into existence without a cause…
Against
- Let me begin with some definitions and ground rules. I will use Richard Dawkins God hypothesis to fully clarify what we are arguing about. p.52 paragraph 1 Richard Dawkins the God Delusion. "There exists a superhuman, supernatural intelligence who deliberately designed and…
- Round five conclusionOutlineI. IntroII. BodyIII. ConclusionIV. SourcesI. IntroFirst, I am going to keep this brief out of fairness. My opponent will not get a chance to respond since this is the second half of the last round. I want to thank my opponent for creating this debate…
- 1291.
Supernatural phenomena should be the main method of evangelization
For
- After reading this round, you will be given the opportunity to vote on the debate. As you know, the following will be your voting card: Pro Tied Con Who did you agree with before the debate? Who did you agree with after the debate? Who had better conduct? Who had better…
- First I would like to address one issue in the 3rd round rebuttal:"If my opponent wishes to challenge my assertion that the Holy Spirit falling on a person indicates conversion" Well, let's look at this:First of all there are five recorded accounts in the New Testament of the…
Against
- I will respond to each of my opponent's points and then offer a closing statement. I would like to make one point about the Seven Sons of Sceva. My opponent drew a comparison between the Secen Sons of Sceva and Non-Signs churches. He implied that just as the Secen Sons of Sceva…
- I don't think my opponent has presented anything in this round that gives pause to any of my arguments, so I shall be brief. "The problem of the Gospel without the Supernatural, is a problem of credibility. My opponent pointed out that creation is all the proof one needs to…
- 1292.
The Biblical God loves and cares for all humanity
For
- There is absolutely no reason whatsoever why I should accept your pathetic debate with all of the spelling errors in it. This is not kindergarten. If this was in college, ALL professors, No exceptions, None would easily give you an F on every single paper that you were to hand…
- The rules are simple enough: Prove that the god according to the bible loves and cares for/ about the ENTIRE human race - not just part of it. . . Which means this god is a superior ego god complex (in which the bible is entirely about and nothing else) who loves to sandwich in…
Against
- I argue god cares about the whole world and not just a small group for 3 reasons. Tough love, Collective consciousness and free will 1. In order to love the entire word he must genuinely want the health of the world in good shape for its eternity. Which means not every group…
- Here on this site you have no authority to dictate how grading is based, Plus there is no grading only public voting based on whatever the voter decides I accepted the debate becuase the question asked is debatable. I dont believe in god but i can debate for or against his…
- 1293.
Private religious schools should be shut down
For
- 1. My opponent states that children having no say in things is normal. He compares religion too sports. MY issue is that religion is a BIT different than sports. Have a child play football at a young age doesn't make him play football until the day he dies. Theology and sports…
- My contentions: 1. The children have no say. Usually, children are placed in these private schools at a relatively young age. Parents get them started VERY quickly They are force fed these beliefs, and they have basically no say in it. Being exposed too all this at such a young…
Against
- Thanks for the great debate, pattjk. I guess it's time to wrap up. Refutations "MY issue is that religion is a BIT different than sports. Have a child play football at a young age doesn't make him play football until the day he dies. Theology and sports are very different…
- Thanks for the response! Refutations "The children have no say." Well, children don't have says in many of the things in their young lives. A bunch of things that go on in a kid's life is because of a parent's choice. For example, a kid may just be doing a sport because his/her…
- 1294.
God would not become incarnate in human form
For
- Round 1 - Opening Arguments Only (No rebuttals) Round 2 - Rebuttals Only Round 3 - Counter-Rebuttals Round 4 - Counter-Rebuttals Round 5 - Closing Arguments and Closing Statements (One round can be FF if there is not enough time but try your best to avoid it) Hebrew Bible…
- The high priest said to him, "I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God." "You have said so," Jesus replied. "But I say to all of you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming…
Against
- Well If i remember correctly, He put his spirit into jesus in the old testament. And jesus is just a piece of god, so what is saying he wouldnt do it again.
- Since this is the last round i want to say thx for a good debate on my first one, And I cant remember which book or verse but it says, that you must be baptized in the name of the father, the son, and the holyghost notice it says name not names.
- 1295.
The Bible is the word of God
For
- Con: "Your Genesis quote: ...God said that Isaac's children would be his and Ishmael's children would not. Has NOTHING to do with this debate. You must be posting in the wrong debate. This debate is about God's word, is it infallible?" Nope. This is a 2 fronted argument. In the…
- In the book of Genesis, Ishmael was rejected by God. God said that Isaac's children would be his and Ishmael's children would not. https://www.biblegateway.com... (Genesis 16:11-12) 11"The angel of the Lord also said to her: "You are now pregnant """"and you will give birth to…
Against
- Your Genesis quote: ...God said that Isaac's children would be his and Ishmael's children would not. Has NOTHING to do with this debate. You must be posting in the wrong debate. This debate is about God's word, is it infallible?
- The question on the table is - "is the Bible without error/infallible? The problem with quoting 2 Timothy 3:16 as evidence, is a problem within itself. For, you see, there are manuscript discrepancies with that verse. To base all concept of all scripture being God-breathed on…
- 1296.
Jesus's sacrifice was necessary for human salvation
For
- If one had curiosity enough to investigate the writings of most religious writers concerning this subject, They would find that not only would Chrisianity not exist, But most hospitals and other benevolent institutions would not either. All peoples would be living under a much…
- We have the writings of Jesus' enemies attesting to the fact of His existence. . . . The Jewish leaders. We have His burial cloth that is causing the skeptics to fall away more and more every year where are being proven wrong. Do not sign on to DEBATE me again till you have…
Against
- First off naturally, You'd have to prove that god even exists in which you cannot. Secondly you'd have to prove that christ has ever existed in which you cannot. Third suppose that christ had existed, He's clearly not the messiah to begin with of this so-called god. Btw, There…
- "We. . . " Whoa there straddle horse. Who is this "we"? Um no, It you, Just you that "have the writings of Jesus' enemies attesting to the fact of His existence" which was how many years after his death was this? So please try harder from something in which you clearly know…
- 1297.
The Christian God is worthy of worship
For
- Interesting argument from my opponent. I believe that I will debate from the bottom up. As far as semantics go, If we were to ask the followers of God if it was good that he saved them from the world ending flood, they would likely say yes. The destruction of the wicked may…
- I would like to start by stating that we are debating upon the pretense that the bible is true. Great: adjective: remarkable in degree, magnitude, or effectiveness. * There are 2.1 billion Christians in the world and there are 14 million Jews. * That number alone ascribes the…
Against
- let us take a look at how my opponent defines great. Great: adjective: remarkable in degree, magnitude, or effectiveness. *So we must first establish what great means to counter this argument. Hitler could have been thought of as great, the same could be said for Allah, or…
- So the topic at hand is "is a Christian God great", and by no means do I think it is. This argument will more than likely turn into does the good out way the evil. As my opponent will surely point out there are acts of charity because of religion, in fact mass acts of charity.…
- 1298.
The Christian God exists
For
- Goodbey and Goodnight
- Okay yes but if you put gears and all the components to make a watch into a bag then trust and shaked to bag around then opened it what is the chance that a clock would appear fully entacted functional and how long and how amy shakes would it take to get a watch out of the bag.…
Against
- Its completely fine, however, there is the fact of probability. If you shake the bag, there is lets say a 1/10000000 of a chance that everything aligns into one specific pattern. But with that argument said, the earth has been in existence for BILLIONS of years. And humans have…
- I hope you do settle this topic for yourself and find how "God" cannot be real. Also, relating to your anecdote, I would have to say that a pocketwatch and nature are two completely different things. One (stopwatch) has a definitive history which can be proven, while nature…
- 1299.
Jesus Christ is fully divine
For
- I am thankful for my opponent's sharp intellect and thorough responses. With two whole rounds to go, this is a lot of dialog to take in, so I will write this round with an extra measure of sensitivity to the reader. I will begin by analyzing the state of my argument in light of…
- Now that I have painted the deity of Christ in broad strokes, it is time to get down to details. As I indicated in my opening round, I used a small subset of scriptures supporting Christ's divinity. Now I will break it down more granularly in the hopes of making the clearest…
Against
- My aim in this round is to show that the verses he uses as "explicit" evidence are not explicit when considered in context, and that the conclusions he draws with them ignore fundamental principles of good exegesis (and even some common sense). And since Pro said the truth of…
- Pro is incorrect in his characterization of the "raw data" that my verses provide; it is not so much that they mention Jesus as distinct from God as it is the fact that they say that he HAS a God (this is a very important distinction); if Jesus was simply "distinct" from God,…
- 1300.
Jesus was not divine
For
- Thank you for a good debate—I wish we could have more rounds! Well, these are my closing arguments My opponent asks the question why I should argue the idea of there being a minor fallacy in the Bible? Because if I can show the Bible is fallible, I have destroyed the very heart…
- I find it quite amusing that he did not respond to a single argument I made. There is biblical evidence to show Jesus was god. However, for any of that to hold water, you need to prove the Bible is the Word of God and is infallible. Once you do that, you win. However, it is…
Against
- His efforts and obvious commitment toward his beliefs are impressing and I wish more youth would fight for and show more interest toward what they believe in. Here are my closing statements/arguments. No believer can truly be a Christian unless they have faith. (Hebrews 11:1)-…
- My opponent's argument that Jesus is not the Son Of God(by the term Trinity thenceforth being a part of God) is supported by scriptures from the Holy Bible. How is it then that he should argue the idea of there being even partial or minor fallacy in the Holy Bible? It's kind of…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?