Discussly

Religion Debate Topics for Students — page 14

2,660 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

StudentsDebatePage 14 of 54
  1. 651.

    Nature cannot come from God but the supernatural can only come from nature

    For

    • there has to be a nature to be exceeded for there to be any supernature
    • thats the thing im gettting at. you are not an atheist, there are no atheists as far as i know belief is theism, science is a belief system i can at best believe what others tell me there is no such thing as accepting you dont know and disbelieving.. they necessarily and…

    Against

    • I am *neither* saying I don't know, *nor* saying I know that there isn't a God. Thus, it's like no belief in God, though it is, ultimately, a belief in the system.
    • This is implying that I *believe* in the non-existence of God. In fact, I don't. I just don't believe or have faith, as I'm an agnostic atheist. Once more, thanks to Pro for graceful concession.
  2. 652.

    Christian universalism is contrary to the Bible

    For

    • (A) Clarifying My PositionI am writing this argument to a particular audience of Christian adherents who resort to the theological (mostly soteriological) position of Christian Universalism, and will be defending my own view of what's known as "Christian Exclusivism". In…

    Against

    • Again, unfortunately, Pro has forfeit. Extend my arguments. I'll close the debate with a nice quote from another personal favorite Christian universalist : "As long as there is any hate in us we are not ready for heaven, not as long as we're shutting the golden doors on anyone…
    • Unfortunately, my opponent has forfeit. Extend my arguments. Here's a quote from one my favorite Christian universalists: "I believe that justice and mercy are simply one and the same thing. [I believe] such is the mercy of God that he will hold his children in the consuming…
  3. 653.

    Jesus fulfills the Sabbath commandment

    For

    • First I would like for you to go to this link, so you would have a better understanding about this. http://www.gotquestions.org... As you can see Jesus is the Sabbath.

    Against

    • PRO failed to have a response to my arguments.
    • Still awaiting PRO's response...
  4. 654.

    The Christian God likely exists

    For

    • Nicely sums up the POE, though flawed.
    • Unfortunately my opponent has conceded the debate in the comments section. I might have responded in part, but I probably won't have time tommorow because of homework and need to finish up some things tonight that are now more important.

    Against

    • I know nothing about morality XD.
    • ~His case!P1: Morality and naturalism Yes, it can be explained by just that. Morals are made by human social behaviors and actually even other social animals. [1] Some claim the morality comes from the natural world itself. [2] Morality is a social construct that comes from…
  5. 655.

    Jesus was most likely Jewish and of African descent

    For

    • I agree with the definitions you proposed.So, let us start with Jesus' race.JESUS WAS BLACK(?): Now, according to the Bible and other sources, Jesus spent a good part of his childhood in Egypt. But in Egypt, it would appear that he did not stand out from the others, or I…
    • Good morning, This is a debate regarding Jesus' skin color and religion. I shall be taking the position of Pro, and my opponent that of Con.

    Against

    • I understand that it is the position of Pro that:Jesus was "black" by which he most likely means of sub-Saharan African ancestral descent. That is, he was anthropologically similar to the normal racial types found in Central, South and Eastern sections of Africa. Jesus was…
    • Despite the anticlimactic conclusion, I hope that readers will still render judgement on our performance by voting. Thank you to any who followed this debate.
  6. 656.

    People should live as if God does not exist

    For

    • Ahh I thought so
    • Your first point seems to be heading towards the Anthropic principle which suggests that the universe is perfectly fine tuned for us and if an electron was even 0.001 larger than a proton life on earth would be very different if existent at all. Well you saying there is plenty…

    Against

    • You argue that there is no evidence that God exists. However, one could state that all things denote there is a God. From the start of the universe to the way that every living being is specifically and perfectly coded, there is plenty of evidence of a divine creator. You also…
  7. 657.

    Belief that sacraments convey grace is reasonable

    For

    • Capitalization for emphasis only. DROP, DROP, DROP Simply saying something "is not enough" is not a valid rebuttal. If it were, instead of this debate being Cons longest debate it could be his shortest. We both could simply say: " What you offered is not enough.", and be done.…
    • Thank you Con for your timely response. Having said that, I do have a few concerns about some of them. As always, I capitalize only for emphasis. MORE DROPPED ARGUMENTS Last round, I offered scriptural and historical evidence to support the claim that the sacrament of the…

    Against

    • Simply saying something "is not enough" is not a valid rebuttal. If itwere, instead of this debate being Cons longest debate it could be hisshortest. We both could simply say: " What you offered is notenough.", and be done. If you're going to say my evidence is "not good…
    • This is the longest debate I have ever had. I will be impressed if anyone actually reads the whole thing and understands all the arguments. If you have, please comment and I will personally congratulate you. We are debating whether all seven sacraments convey grace. Providing…
  8. 658.

    Attending church is not necessary for a strong relationship with God

    For

    • As you can tell my opponent has nothing to say, until she posts her argument I have nothing further to say. I felt like I made a valid point.
    • I am a non denominational Christian. It's where we aren't tied down to one specific theory. We believe certain things that some other religions do as well. We are open-minded to different beliefs. My great uncle goes to a catholic church and wanted his daughter (my cousin) to…

    Against

    • I don't know what denomination you are, but I'm a roman catholic. In our religion, we believe that in order to get close to God, we must eat his body and drink his blood. (It's not cannibalism) When we celebrate the mass, we not only listen to the word of the LORD and learn…
  9. 659.

    It is impossible for God to exist

    For

    • Extremely sorry for not replying I'm on holiday and the wifi here isn't great but I'm here. Since we know that we don't have all the knowledge in the universe, suppose if we had 5% of that knowledge in the universe wouldn't if the 95% of the knowledge we don't know contradicts…
    • I want to know from any athiest or agnostics about whether it is impossible for God to exist.

    Against

    • Extend again.
    • Well goodness gracious. Extend.
  10. 660.

    Believing in God is both positive and negative

    For

    • and what if they didnt find adam and eve
    • your lack of arguments does make not for a debate

    Against

    • whell there are so much theres sintest did not find boons of adim or eve there for that qustons the exston of the gardin of edan
    • well i dont thick that it is negative to beleve in god but there are a bunch off qustis like if since found dinos why did thay not fine adim or eve
  11. 661.

    Depictions of Jesus as white are historically inaccurate

    For

    • You're getting pretty deep on me here. Deeper than I intended. I will not debate against the valid points you made "But he is also portrayed as black and Asian, if you're going to church in Senegal or Korea. ". That's not the point of the debate. This was more so for Christians…
    • First, I was kind of hoping for a racist reply as this is the behavior and thinking I want to shine a light on. It's inherintely against the ideals of Christianity and for those who see him as white and belittle other races, I was hoping to show a different point of view. I…

    Against

    • I share my opponent's distaste for silly assumptions and backwards thinking, and we have a shared dislike of egocentric thinking and a lack of education and curiosity. It may be obvious that I took this argument to serve as a devil's advocate. This is a question that many may…
    • Jesus is often shown to be white in the context of a White European society, which is the source of much of American culture. But he is also portrayed as black and Asian, if you're going to church in Senegal or Korea. This, as I have stated previously, may be just as valid as…
  12. 662.

    Atheism should not be considered a religion

    For

    • I follow your reasoning and thought. and I recieved my def. from dictionary.com accatually I lied, sorry I miss the point: 'Atheists don't need to PROVE that God does NOT exist. It's irrational and impossible.' what? for anything to be there must be a creator, every religion…
    • Faith: belief that is not based on proof. key word Belief, atheist do not believe in any thing, and thus have no faith. also to believe not to believe is an oxymoron that is an IDEA not a BELIEF. religion is based upon A belief system more so than an idea. example Christianity…

    Against

    • "'Atheists don't need to PROVE that God does NOT exist. It's irrational and impossible.' what? for anything to be there must be a creator, every religion believes that in some point, that is the general FAITH of all religions." That's not true. Christians don't believe that God…
    • "Faith: belief that is not based on proof." I request the source of this definition. If you cannot provide a reasonable source, your argument is void. It seems as if though you are only using this definition because it matches yours. The definition I provided was the entry in…
  13. 663.

    Catholicism is the foundation of Christianity

    For

    • I have to admit, the way you explained your tree is better than mine, let me rephrase my tree analogy. The Apostles gave a list of teachings, besides from the Bible. The Catholic Church is the only Christian denomination that holds on to ALL the traditions and teachings. And,…
    • Catholicism did not create Christianity, Catholicism was Christianity. There was not any other Christian Religion except for the Catholic Church. Of course this is a relative statement because Catholicism was split into the east and west. Non-Catholic Churches never came about…

    Against

    • Yes I do agree Catholicism is Christianity, just a very different form compared to others. And as for tradition, should we go back a few ages like the Amish, because it's more traditional?
    • To your tree analogy, I like to think of the life of Jesus is the base, and Catholicism was the first branch. The others branched off of this main branch. If there wasn't Jesus there would be no Catholicism. Therefore Jesus is the base of Christianity not catholicism
  14. 664.

    The Christian God cannot logically exist

    For

    • "My opponent has posted no opening arguments, but given his choice of word definitions and the number of times I have encountered this debate before, I feel I have a good chance at guessing the arguments he will likely be making. " I apologize. I should have clarified that the…
    • I will take the pro position that the Christian god, who is all powerful, all knowing, and all caring cannot logically exist. Con will take the position that the Christian god can logically exist. Definitions: Omniscient: having complete or unlimited knowledge, awareness, or…

    Against

    • "We can be sure according to the laws of logic. It is positively fallacious to just elevate god above the laws of logic without actually positing an argument." I believe my supporting argument immediately followed the statement in question. I said: "To support this as a…
    • Hello, socialpinko & all those reading. I will be your devil's advocate for today. While I'm not personally invested in my position, I hope to give you more than the usual "because the bible says so"-type responses. - My opponent has posted no opening arguments, but given his…
  15. 665.

    Religion receives too much respect in society

    For

    • I am arguing that religion is given more respect than it deserves. It is considered rude to inquire their reasoning when it comes to their religion, however, it is not rude when inquiring about someone's political views. Both of these topics are based on belief and opinion, yet…
    • My opponent's points:Religion taken as a whole & What is religion? I agree with these points. Religion is a very broad term that includes Secular Buddhism to Extremist Islam. Buddhism being considered more of a "philosophy" than a "religion" and Extremist Islam killing others…

    Against

    • My opponent essentially agrees with most of my case. It's evident that when religion is taken as a whole, it is one of the most disrepected ideologies on planet Earth. I argue that religion is not given too much respect, and that's a good thing.Religion taken as a whole & What…
    • Religion Taken as a WholeBorrowing an example from Sam Harris: Religion, when taken as a unit, is about as useful a term as sports. There are sports like Thai Boxing and Badminton, which have little in common apart from breathing. The point being that taking such a broad range…
  16. 666.

    Religion has been a tragic mistake in human history

    For

    • I understand. I extend my arguments then.
    • RULES: NO SOURCES! I want this to completely come from you based on your own philosophical views There will be profanity There were be no trolling No attacking eachother Enjoy the debate and Thank eachother for the debate in the last round Religion Is a Tragic Misstep in Human…

    Against

    • I'm really sorry about this - I am literally within the first ten minutes of having joined this site, and obviously did not pay enough attention to what I was signing up for. On this topic especially, I am far too strongly on the 'for' side to even begin to compose an argument.…
  17. 667.

    The existence of a god is logically impossible

    For

    • fact is also math, knowledge.. i dont know that the earth has a molten core, i didnt do the math god is factually impossible without facts different debate, but matter is eternal, no beginning and no end, only now
    • so you have personal memory of a god

    Against

    • You keep using the word fact, but what is the meaning of it? This: Fact a thing done: as a obsolete : feat b : crime c archaic : action 2 archaic : performance, doing 3 : the quality of being actual : actuality 4 a : something that has actual existence b : an actual occurrence…
    • A personal memory of God is not needed. Let me ask you, do you believe that the Earth has a molten core? Do YOU have a personal memory of it? No one does. The question you must ask yourself is how can nothing come from something? The 'Big Bang' is believed in, but where is the…
  18. 668.

    Religious tolerance is a worthy cause

    For

    • Let's get started. 1. Islam's endorsement of inappropriate behaviour. My opponent says that Sha'aria is what governs Iran. It is true that there is a religious government in power in Iran and that this government engages in acts that many of us find objectionable. It is also…
    • He has forfeited his round because I missed mine (due to out-of-town work commitments). He did not have to do that. Now, to the issues. 1. "Hasty generalisation" is simply the name of a logical fallacy that basis itself on drawing a full conclusion based on a small sample of…

    Against

    • Pro made an excellent response, and I am happy we have made it to the final round! 1.Ah, I was unaware that was the official title of a logical fallacy. 2.Actually, there are two definitions for 'doctrine' – one is a specific principle, and the other is a broader, encompassing…
    • My opponent was on a business trip and and unable to post a response, so I will pass this round to give him the chance to post his response in the next round.
  19. 669.

    Religion is harmful to society

    For

    • Religion is Harmful to SocietyIt promotes irrational thought. Things like Catastrophizing, Minimization, Grandiosity, Personalization, Magical thinking, Leaps in logic, "All or nothing" thinking, Paranoia and Delusional thinking are all promoted by…
    • "i really don't know if i am right in the point i made at round 1 cos i didn't do enough research."So you're lazy and don't want to debate. You want me to do all the work for you, eh?Sorry, if you want to debate, you need to do some research.Thanks anyway.

    Against

    • I accept your challenge. This is my second debate here. I hope it goes better than my first one were the opposition forfeited every round -_-.
    • I don't pretend I am an expert in anthropology. So no I am not sure about my position. Its just an opinion. Every debate is an opportunity to learn and you throw it away. I am not an anthropologist and If I was I would not waste my time debating anthropology in this community.…
  20. 670.

    A god would not require faith from believers

    For

    • Oh absolutely not. The entire bible is about god and his frail fragile ego. So that right there SCREAMS to the proof that the number one thing preached in the bible is faith. If god were genuine in any way, he couldn't care less about his ego and love would be the number one…
    • "Imagine a world where everyone knew that the God of the Bible existed." Who would want to? After all this god character in which there's absolutely no proof whatsoever that he even exists is based solely on evil, anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, evil, jealousy in all of…

    Against

    • Okay, so, you claim that "The entire bible is about god and his frail fragile ego." You then say this screams proof that the number one thing preached in the Bible is faith. That is a self-justifying statement and thus a logical fallacy. You throw around the word proof without…
    • To begin with, faith is not the number one thing preached in the Bible. The number one thing, if there is even a focus, is arguably love. My opponent claims it is faith though, but does not explain how. All I gotta say on this matter is James 2:17, "Faith without works is…
  21. 671.

    The New Testament account of Jesus is a fabrication

    For

    • They are following my rules for this debate. I must first say that my opponent must have misunderstood something within my last post. I have made no assertion that a man named Jesus, who represents the framework for Christianity never existed. I am only concerned with the…
    • I will first cite the contrast between Jesus and the Egyptian God Horus. There were many interpretations of Horus, most of which were conceived up to 3,000 years before Jesus was alleged to be born. I will have to omit certain details of the interpretation I will be focusing…

    Against

    • He focuses his objection on the assertion that there are parallels between the account of Jesus as told in the Gospels, and the myth of Horus. This is otherwise known as the 'Pagan copy-cat' movement, which states that the story of Jesus is a copy of earlier pagan religions. It…
    • Hi! I look forward to debating this interesting topic with you. I will allow you to make your points and I will respond to them. God Bless
  22. 672.

    The Judeo-Christian God does not exist

    For

    • Thanks! Good luck to you as well! Instead of posting three long, lengthy arguments, I'll just post three small ones that I feel are fairly solid evidence for God's non-existence. 1.No reliable evidence supporting God. Simple enough, the only real evidence supporting God is the…
    • I'm going to try this one more time...hopefully I won't have any trolls or forfeiters. By Pro, I am arguing that God probably doesn't exist. For the purposes of this debate, God shall refer to the Judeo-Christian deity. God - (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions)…

    Against

    • . http://upload.wikimedia.org...
    • Arguments extended
  23. 673.

    Humans cannot prove God's existence

    For

    • First of all, the Bible is most likely fiction. You are correct that I can't prove 100% for sure that it's fiction, but evidence suggests it is. It has many stories, such as turning water to wine, and other stories like that which are scientifically impossible. There are also…
    • First of all I would like to apologize to Con for my slow reply, as I have been busy as of late. As stated previously, I believe that humans cannot prove the existence of a God or deity. I fail to see how Con has in fact given evidence to prove that a God or deity can be…

    Against

    • Please note that many people have this bad habit of thinking that everything has to be proven to be true, but that isn't true. Just because something isn't proven doesn't mean it doesn't exist. For example, someone heard God speaking. That person told another person that God…
    • As Con had said, humans cannot prove the existence of a God or deity. And why not? Pro, you have said that the Bible is fictional, right? Where is the proof? How is the Bible fictional? Yes, people have proof to the existence of God, but many people just don't bother believing…
  24. 674.

    Unbaptized infants should not be condemned to hell

    For

    • con engages in jibber jabber that is hard to take seriously. hopefully the voters recognize this.
    • it's hard to understand con's points. they metaphically go to hell, or they dont do metaphor so they are in hell? regardless, the point is that the catholic church doesn't teach any of this metaphorically, and you without question go to hell if you aren't baptized.

    Against

    • ...and he plagiarized the dictionary.
    • The first evidence I produce in refuting the opening argument is the etymology of 'Teach': "docent, docible, docile - Docent comes from Latin docere, "to teach"; docible is "capable of learning" and docile first meant "teachable." One may agree that the Church officially…
  25. 675.

    Jesus of Nazareth was a real historical figure

    For

    • Making a show of myself? I think not. I'm not here asking for proof of Jesus's evidence. If you think you're an intelligent being created by the universe, or you just evolved from a tiny fish. I'll just let you think like that, afterall, it's all up to Judgement.
    • Apparently, no. But can prove he's real simply by grabbing a knife and slitting your neck, that's how you prove it.

    Against

    • I still think you are not getting the point of the conversation. Our debate is prove Jesus exists. If you was to slit my jugular, I could not tell science if Jesus is in fact real or not because I'll be dead. Now in order to win this debate, you must prove Jesus is real. So far…
    • Can you prove this with scientific evidence such as DNA?
  26. 676.

    The Christian God cannot be proven

    For

    • Well then. Um I guess vote for whoever.
    • Unfortunately I need to forfeit. I don't have a reliable internet connection at the moment and don't want to give sub-par responses. While I definitely have a response to my opponent's arguments I don't have the means to respond at the present time.

    Against

    • My apologies for missing round 3. I have been traveling and the time got away from me. To close the debate, please consider the following questions. 1) Did pro fulfill his burden of proof? The answer is a resounding no. Pro's entire argument rests on the fact that logical…
    • I would like to begin by thanking my opponent for his thoughtful opening argument, and to apologize for what he sees as a breach of conduct. I certainly did not intend any sort of analysis as to what it means to not bear burden of proof, I was simply stating the facts of what…
  27. 677.

    Jesus cannot be God

    For

    • In Christianity, There are ten commandments. The first one, which is undeniably one of the most important, says that, You shall have no Gods before me. It sounds simple, since my religion (Islam) also believes in the following of one god. As it is mentioned in many other Islam…

    Against

    • Extend
    • Forfeit
  28. 678.

    It is reasonable not to believe in God

    For

    • We all have rights to are beliefs and I don't judge beliefs it's better not to be like soe, Christians who tell us things for not belong in God .
    • Reading that made me so happy man I was going to use the same reason that u just said and to see others who understand how I feel as an atheist at my age of 14 I'm. Happy to see I'm not alone

    Against

    • I know, right?! That's why we should legalize Gay Marrige, Euthenasia, and abortion. The only people who don't support its legalization are deeply religious people. So it's simple: don't make it hard for everyone else and just let us legalize it and if it's against your beliefs…
    • Same here, actually. I'm glad I'm not the only atheist teenager (13, btw) who's willing to express their views on religion.
  29. 679.

    The Catholic Church does more harm than good

    For

    • I would like to answer my opponents questions before I get started. When I say the Catholic Church I mean to entail the priests, nuns, ideology, and everything that makes the Catholic Church the Catholic Church. TO better clarify the premise, I could restate it as, "The…
    • I will be arguing for why the Catholic Church is a source of great evil and horror (a bad thing).

    Against

    • Ok, I'm just going to touch on a few things here, mainly having to do with how other religions also must be considered evil if the Catholic Church is evil. I would like to clarify that I do not believe any religion is inherently evil, just that if the Catholic Church is evil…
    • Firstly, the Children's Crusade was made of the children's own accord, not with the approval of the Church. The Church sent priests to bless them, to give them courage and grace of God, but they were not "suited up and taken to the middle east." Stephen (the leader of the…
  30. 680.

    Dating a non-Christian is not sinful

    For

    • "It's your interpretation of his supposed word, therefore you are talking for this supposed god - stop back talking your god, sir! It's a very inadequate way of proving your holy endeavor! Do you want to treat your god like a cloud, sir? Do you want your cloud to be a puffy…
    • you failed to respond to these verses, nevertheless i will refute your claims: "For people that believe in this so called god, you don't seem to care how much you butcher his supposed writing with your premature interpretation that you purposely butcher to support your own…

    Against

    • 666. You're back-talking god by putting your sinful dick in his mouth. You just vomit out assertions with no proof to your claims. That's the only thing you have in common with god - you **** it up, instead of fixing it because you cannot accept that you're a **** up. Why do…
    • It's your interpretation of his supposed word, therefore you are talking for this supposed god - stop back talking your god, sir! It's a very inadequate way of proving your holy endeavor! Do you want to treat your god like a cloud, sir? Do you want your cloud to be a puffy…
  31. 681.

    Belief in the Christian God is logical

    For

    • "Apparently I disagree with such a statement. I feel that belief in the Christian god is rather illogical at best. I ask that my opponent present points on why they feel it is logical. I would also ask that voters vote not on the position they agree with but who did the better…
    • It seems I have overestimated my opponent. I did not respond directly to each and every single one of my opponent's points because it was unnecessary. Each and every single one of my opponent's points assumed that I was arguing that the conclusion for the existence of the…

    Against

    • Obviously this wasn't quite where I expected this debate to go.... however instead of arguing against my opponents perception of the word logical I am going to argue the idea that he has presented. I would ask that voters vote on who did the better debating. Thank you. I will…
    • Apparently I disagree with such a statement. I feel that belief in the Christian god is rather illogical at best. I ask that my opponent present points on why they feel it is logical. I would also ask that voters vote not on the position they agree with but who did the better…
  32. 682.

    Islam is the best religion in the world

    For

    • islam is a very good religion you know why because it teaches us respect.think about your religion example:christian they belive in jesus us we believe that jesus is a prophet of god and only there is only one god . its say in the quran: "ALLAH is HE besides Whom there is none…

    Against

    • My opponent has failed to prove Islam is the best religion in the world. There are other religions such as Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, ect... He must prove that Islam is better than all of the others.
    • My opponent says that Islam is the best religion in the world, yet he has failed to prove why. He is arguing against all religions, but by using nothing else but verses from the Qu'ran. His example of Christianity proves nothing at all. I could say the same thing about the…
  33. 683.

    Jesus of Nazareth is alive

    For

    • In your opinion, do the Christian scriptures teach that Jesus is physically alive? (1 Corinthians 15 is a good place to start).
    • Thanks for taking up the challenge! Are you a Muslim? I don't know many Muslims. There aren't very many in regional Australia. Well yes, Jesus has no continued physical existence on the earth. However, to infer that the throne room of God has no physical aspects is ...…

    Against

    • I am an Atheist. Your claims heavily implied a belief that Jesus is alive in the same sense that every biological being is. I'm not arguing for or against the existence of any god(s), just that there is no reason to believe, under any belief system, that this is a true claim.
    • I assert that there are three possible scenarios: 1- The Muslims are right and Jesus was only a prophet that was swept away to heaven and appeared to die to those on earth. In this scenario, Jesus no longer has a physical existence in the realm of humanity and can't be…
  34. 684.

    There are no arguments for God that cannot be refuted

    For

    • #1&2 we ca ignore. 3: //If logic is a convention of man, then it is not absolute// The problem with what my opponent just said is that if there is even ONE man made logical construct that is absolute, his claim falls entirely. //for these notions directly oppose each other…
    • I also would like to say that this argument is new to me yet I enjoy the challenge of it. I will take each point one by one and then draw conclusions regarding them. //1:This is a logical argument. // Well you haven't made the argument yet sooooooooooo. But what ever. //2:Pro…

    Against

    • Thanks to petersaysstuff for instigating the debate. I also want to thank him for making it three rounds for the benefit of our readers.Defense of Argument 1. This is a logical argument. Pro is tasked to refute an argument, so I gave him a logical one. 2. Pro must use logical…
    • I appreciate my opponent's rapid responses, which I hope to address to their fullest herein.Defense of Argument In the event it is not obvious, my point-by-point argument is cumulative. That is, each point is not meant to stand in isolation from the others. Rather, each point…
  35. 685.

    The faith required for Christian salvation is unclear

    For

    • con makes an issue out of me not stating a type of christianity. i don't need to as we are examining the formulas people give for their own worth. i argue what i see, you argue what you see. i also point out, con hasn't shown why believing he is the Son of God, or that he died…
    • so here we have if folks? the official list of things that must be believed, through milleniums of fighting and wars by christians..... it has been officially listed on debate.org during the month of June, 2014? notice the sarcasm. so you are asserting that someone would not be…

    Against

    • I would like to state for the conclusion of this debate, that I think Pro has completely misconstrued what he is asking in his own question. The question proposed was: "The threshold of faith required for Christians to be saved is unclear" What this means is that the onus was…
    • Again, we have the problem that you have not addressed which is crucial to the argument: to which branch of Christianity are you referring? Since you have not specified, I am going to continue to assume you mean the original and uncorrupted version of Christianity. I will give…
  36. 686.

    Accepting evolution requires as much faith as believing in God

    For

    • 99% Species Extinction/VestigialityFirst, intelligent design does not necessarily mean perfect design. Maybe the design was perfect at the start, but the creature evolved over time (I do support the validity of natural selection, I only oppose evolution when it comes to genetic…
    • Alright, based on the comments, it looks like I have an uphill battle here.First of all, I would like to point out that what I am arguing for in this debate is intelligent design - no specific religion.I also would like to say that I do not disagree with evolution being stated…

    Against

    • "First, intelligent design does not necessarily mean perfect design. Maybe the design was perfect at the start, but the creature evolved over time."Right, but typically a 0.1% success rate is not deemed intelligent. You would not call a student who gets 0.1% of answers right in…
    • "I am arguing for in this debate is intelligent design."Rebutting this:What is intelligent about the fact that most estimates say 99.9% of all species that have ever existed on this planet are now extinct? (http://www.pbs.org...) This is just one site supporting the 99%…
  37. 687.

    Taking intelligibility's preconditions for granted fits only the Bible

    For

    • You have explained the the biblical world view make the preconditions able to be taken for granted, but you merely shifted the burden to taking God for granted, and evolution still provides another explaniation as to WHY we take the preconditions for granted regardless of if we…
    • What reason to you have to take the bible or God for granted? Con:"perhaps the evolutionist would say, "We know that the laws of logic exist because we use them." Well if they know that the laws of logic exist, they would have a reason to take them for granted. Which they do…

    Against

    • Ok, my opponents largest and most frequently asked question is 'What reason do you have to take the Bible or God for granted?'. I am going to make this as clear as daylight for my opponent. The Bible, the Word of God, is the only source that gives us reason to take the…
    • I won't waste time, but thank you for accepting this discussion. Although it won't, I feel, get a lot of response, not many people will vote in other words. Memory is not a reliable source for knowledge: How can it be? As my opponent pointed out we can have false memories at…
  38. 688.

    Gods and religion arose to explain the unknown

    For

    • Life is its own purpose, there is no need for any other reason for life. It"s like asking why the sky exists, or what is the purpose of electromagnetism. Assuming there is a God, how does that give life purpose if He will not explain what His purpose is? As to the question "who…
    • With regard to the finding of Noah"s Ark, it is not true: http://www.snopes.com... Accepting that "God" had to come first because the Bible says so simply leads to a circular argument: How do you know the Bible is true " because it is the inspired word of God " How do you know…

    Against

    • actualy the quistion is what is purpose of life?why we should live if we should die?the question is only in religion, and scientist just base on factnow i ask you how about the miracle happend, life baby from 5th floor fall down but isn't die? and how about this…
    • Introductionthanks for the pro that make this debateand because my religion is Christian so i just purpose base on Christianactually, this is also my first debate so please be fun.. :DArgument : People are not created Gods, religion, and the supernaturalbecause we know that…
  39. 689.

    At least one god exists

    For

    • I'm going to list a few reasons why a rational person ought to believe in God. 1) The Cosmological Argument I. Everything with a beginning has a cause II. The universe has a beginning III. Therefore, The universe has a cause. 2) The Teleological Argument Had the conditions of…

    Against

    • On the resurrection of Jesus Christ, It seems that the proponent made bold claims without backing them up with evidence. To make a valid case against the resurrection of Jesus, I will cite the historian Richard Carrier (https://infidels.…
    • The cosmological argument does not prove theism at all. The only thing it proves is that the universe has a prime cause. It doesn"t suggest, Let alone prove, That the cause was a being, And it doesn"t suggest that this cause was a being that is eternal, Omnipotent, Omniscient,…
  40. 690.

    Religious upbringing unduly shapes people's beliefs

    For

    • So the uneducated W0LV3NBANE can't use the Internet. You need to remove the capital letters and spaces from my link because debate. Org is a broken pile of trash. Oh, And Matt Dillahunty butt kicks any droppings from the laughable Christian sites you spew out. Yah. Still…
    • If you cannot defend your arse of a god (or gods) in 500 characters then tough. You have no hope of winning just like every idiot who has come before you. I outwitted you as you walked into my cunning trap of cunning. Ha. I also win on sources - https://www. Youtube. Com/watch?…

    Against

    • Please refrain from bringing up the sizes of penises in a Formal debate. You make a claim with no source with Matt I have come to the conclusion that you refuse to have a proper debate I will refrain in the future from debating with people who bring up the sizes of penises in…
    • Your source doesn't work. I haven't needed to give a argument because I am Con. All I need to do is Disprove your points. Regardless, Since I can't fit anything into this, Here are some sources https://www. Premierchristianity.…
  41. 691.

    Sola scriptura is not a coherent doctrine

    For

    • YOU SAY: "Christianity claims that putting your faith into Jesus to simply mediate salvation on your behalf after dying on the cross so that it may be so, is all that you need to have Salvation. No added book would ever change that in any circumstance, unless it refutes the…
    • When I am talking about Sola Scriptura I am talking about the belief that the Bible alone contains all of the truths of Christianity and there is nothing additional to it that we need to know in terms of faith or salvation. God's revelation is entirely in the Bible. Basically,…

    Against

    • To your first response, we know this because Christians, ever since the creation of the Bible, considered what you're considering now. Scholars always look into other writings but again they are either useless in the sense of S.S. (for one to find salvation; even the apocrypha…
    • I apologize but it seems as though the word Salvation is becoming completely over complicated to no longer hold its definition. Salvation is the saving of the soul from sin and its consequences. Christianity claims that putting your faith into Jesus to simply mediate salvation…
  42. 692.

    Intelligent people are less likely to be religious

    For

    • Your right there were many intelligent people from our past that contributed to our accumulated knowledge, Many if not all (going back far enough) were religious. However an intelligent person of that time would know of the consequences of disagreeing with the existing state of…
    • Research has shown that people with higher intelligence are less likely to be religious. Conversely religion appeals more to the less intelligent. Why the negative correlation between religiosity and intelligence? This debate will be only 3 rounds, As the religious tend to…

    Against

    • (null)
    • I'll begin by addressing a number of points you brought up: 1) "The rise of highly intellectual thinkers was not because of their religion, But in spite of it. " I would disagree with this statement and the example you gave of Christianity leading to the Dark Ages in Europe.…
  43. 693.

    Many religions restrict free thought

    For

    • As I did not include one about Islam, here you go. Islam is a very strict religion and you can tell, by having women wear certain clothing, forbidding certain activities, and making them perform certain daily tasks a day. This is making people essentially cattle, having them do…
    • I believe that several religions restrict people from being able to think their own thoughts. Specifically Christianity and Islam's laws are very restrictive and do not allow people to express themselves. A basic law is in the ten commandments, it restricts people from looking…

    Against

    • Thank you for reading.
    • Thank you for that response.1) IslamI need my opponent to be more specific. The fact that Muslim women generally wear the same thing does not justify the position. And the examples provided otherwise are extremely fague. Everyone has daily tasks they're required to complete,…
  44. 694.

    It is reasonable to believe God does not exist

    For

    • I belive that a higher power exists. But I'm not sure that it was "God" who created the earth. I believe that we evolved from apes. Unless someone can show actual proof other that "we found this and it seems like this from the Bible." Because I don't believe in the Bible or…
    • I believe that a higher power exists. I belive that we evolved from apes. (I belive in science and the theory of evolution.) I think that more proof has to be given to make the theory of "God" true. We need hard facts. Hard proof that something exists and that we didn't just…

    Against

    • There are countless arguments for God's existence, but being a transcendent being it is very hard to find 100% proof of his existence. these argument include, but are not limited to: the anthropic principle (that the universe allows human life as we know it to exist), fine…
    • That's alright :)
  45. 695.

    America should return to Christianity as its founding principle

    For

    • I believe that America should go back to Christianity. Students are learning about evolution, the big bang, and other lies. Rarely do you ever learn about Christianity in Public School. The democrats are trying to change the Pledge of Allegiance, because of the "one nation…

    Against

    • vote me!
    • Extend all arguments
  46. 696.

    The Bible lacks historical credibility

    For

    • Your points did nothing to prove the story. Your not even Proving you god exists so that doesn't make your point any better. Near death experiences are a reaction of the brain not a supernatural event. The United States Air Force triggered near death experiences with a…
    • Your point with Noah's ark doesn't improve credibility of the bible. You need to prove your god exists in order for that claim to work but god isn't somthing you can prove it's an unfalsifiable hypothesis that and no evidence for the Christian god and the link you provided…

    Against

    • My points on Noah's Ark are meant to prove that Noah's Ark did happen, therefore making the bible credible and that my god exists. It is true that having only two of every animal may cause deformations due to inbreeding. However, not all animal newborns that are created through…
    • Under the laws of science that we live in, a flood the size of Noah's ark is very unlikely, that is true. However, we must remember that GOD created the flood. God does not work under the laws of science, because he is a god. That is also how the universe was made. God has…
  47. 697.

    Jesus rose from the dead

    For

    • When weighing the arguments pro and contra, I must conclude that contra has failed to refute my arguments, whereas he has not brought up any arguments against the thesis that Jesus is risen from the dead.
    • If that's all you have to say, I can conclude my arguments are convincing.

    Against

    • jesus rose from my balls
    • smelly noob
  48. 698.

    The Bible contains no contradictions

    For

    • Father of Joseph: My opponent does not refute my point. As BibleTruth.org says, "On comparing the two genealogies, it will be found that Matthew, writing more immediately for Jews, deemed it enough to show that the Saviour was sprung from Abraham and David; whereas Luke,…
    • Father of Joseph: As AnswersinGenesis says: "Luke is being very precise. Jesus was thought to be the son of Joseph, who was of Heli. Notice that Luke never said that Joseph was the son of Heli in the Greek. This reduces the alleged contradiction to nothing and shows that Luke"s…

    Against

    • No argument.
    • Father of Joseph: It clearly says, "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli." Notice the use of the word "son". Unless pro can show that his unlikely theory is true, his objection here means…
  49. 699.

    The bodily resurrection of Jesus historically occurred

    For

    • I accept your challenge.
    • I apologize to my opponent; I had misunderstood the rules from round 1. I had thought I was able to rebut all arguments they had posted. Because of this misunderstanding, I will forfeit this round.Before I conclude, I do want to make some clarifications against what my opponent…

    Against

    • As Kollo did not follow the rules set up in round 1 or the grace period I gave in the comments, this must be counted as a forfeit. Disappointing.
    • Read all instructions for pre-acceptance requirements. Last opponent did not and garnered an automatic forfeit. This debate is over whether Jesus, a Judean individual in the first century, rose from the dead historically as recorded in the canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark,…
  50. 700.

    Intelligent design does not support Christianity

    For

    • I assert that intelligent design does not support Christianity. The intelligent designer is definitely not the God of the Bible by any means. Intelligent Design instead supports deism and pantheism only (and other variations of these). Why Intelligent Design does not support…
    • ========= Age of Earth & Genesis ========= My opponent asserts that the earth is not 6,000 years old under a Biblical perspective because genealogical age calculations may have been inaccurate. He says that names or entire lineages were left out. That may be true, but it still…

    Against

    • ============== Age of the Earth ============== No, my assertion was not that the calculations were incorrect, but that calculations in general are impossible – insofar as their function does not permit their calculation. Moreover, a literal 6 day creation is absolutely…
    • ============= Introduction: ============= I am glad to hear that my opponent was fully informed when instigating this debate. This, however, in no way changes the fact that he has a wholly inaccurate understanding of both Genesis and Christian hermeneutics. ============= Age of…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.