Politics Debate Topics — page 50
3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 2451.
The Republican Party is not right-wing
For
- Republicans have fought incredibly hard against liberals. Only 7 states and D.C. have not implemented any state laws regarding same-sex marriage, whereas 28 states have undertaken laws with the purpose to cut down on same-sex marriage and even ban it altogether." Then why don't…
- You, my friend, have not truly provided an argument. You simply said that my argument is my opinion. Based on the definition of conservative, I have proven that the GOP is not conservative, as it does not even attempt to propose legislation that would conserve America's social,…
Against
- To begin, I'd like to reference a poll that i will be using later in my rebuttal. According to a pew research poll only 30% of republicans are identified as moderate or liberal. That's much less than 50% or above. Using your opinions of conservative values however, you are…
- Republicans have fought incredibly hard against liberals. Only 7 states and D.C. have not implemented any state laws regarding same-sex marriage, whereas 28 states have undertaken laws with the purpose to cut down on same-sex marriage and even ban it altogether. The house…
- 2452.
The United States should have stricter gun control
For
- As is with my previous round, I remain adamant that her latter two arguments are unnecessary for this debate. Since I have been bent on proving one rather simple premise, this round need not be long. Let me go back again: we both agree that preserving the human life and the…
- As I've done with the previous rounds, I am determined to focus this debate on gun rights to a specific contention: whether the application of stricter gun controls will lead to a positive consequence in the balance of armed, innocent citizens and criminals with weapons.…
Against
- My final round for this debate will be short and sweet, as I feel that the readers will have already have my previous arguments in mind; there is no need for me to be redundant. My main point in my final round is that my opponent has not met any of my challenges, and the…
- I've noticed that his arguments are all based on the conjecture that somehow stricter gun control laws will, in its projected duty, doubly lower crime rates without harming the self-defense abilities and liberty of citizens. I will show that his guesswork is exactly that: a…
- 2453.
President Obama was not a socialist
For
- This is my fourth time doing this debate. I have never had someone make it to the end.In anycase, Socialists dont call President Obama a socialist. President Obama does not Identify as one, and Political science experts find such a lable on the President to be a misnomer.…
- Extended
Against
- I accept and agree to the definitions and terms here and what we had previously discussed in the comment area. I look forward to a vigorous and lively discussion of the issue.
- Obama was not only endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America. He attended their meetings and even spoke at their events. Obama was deeply connected to this organization and continues to associate with others who are as well. I can not find a video of Obama saying the…
- 2454.
Barack Obama was a good president for the economy
For
- President Obama was/is a good president economically for the United states of AmericaDefinitonsObama-Current President of the USBurden of Proof is on me. Con must refute my pointsRulesFF results in automatic lossRound 1 acceptance onlyNo Kritiks the resolution is not biased in…
- I've already made my arguement Extend
Against
- Ok...... Since you said "Round 1 acceptance only" Am not going to state my argument until round 2, Ok??? Please forgive me if am wrong.
- Crap.....I forgot to post....Sorry
- 2455.
One cannot be both a libertarian and a Democrat
For
- Goodbye
- And the saga continues.
Against
- Alright! First debate on the site! So excited. Okay, before I begin: I am not from US, so I cannot actually be a Democrat per se. But I am a avid follower of US politics, and for the sake of this debate, I will argue that it is possible to left of centre on the political…
- 2456.
Free speech should be restricted to combat right-wing populism
For
- What side opposition has failed to prove in this debate is that the harms caused by right-wing populists are not great enough for us to enact a policy to protect people from these individuals/parties. A "correlation not causation" argument is all side opposition gives to three…
- It is problematic for side opposition to deny the racist vitriol that is not only endemic when we look at actual examples of right wing populists on the ground " the Front National in France, Trump in the US, Duterte in the Philippines, the list goes on"but is the cause of hate…
Against
- In response to Pro critiquing my explanation of the correlation between populism and hate crimes I will once again say the same thing: "In your first argument you outline how populism maintains its heterogeneous following by having unspecific policies and by blaming minority…
- First of all I would like to apologize for any mistakes I might make during this debate since this is my first debate on this website (I signed up a couple of hours ago). Feel free to let me know should I make any rookie mistakes. I will start my counter-argument by stating…
- 2457.
The rise of China is safe and peaceful
For
- Hello again, Firstly, I just want to mention that I am starting to lose track on what your main point of the argument is at, I do not want us and the audience to be caught up in semantics of the issue but I appreciate you showing me the two articles and other people's…
- I also feel very grateful, for this most exciting and thought provoking debate, it is always great to share ideas and understand other people's perspectives. If I were to debate my own position, I would say the biggest fear from China in the next current decade or two for…
Against
- The Rise of China is Safe and Peaceful (Is it???)It is late in the day for me to be asking the same question.safe = 'not likely to cause or lead to harm or injury; not involving danger or risk.'Is selling military hardware to Pakistan 'safe'.This happened today in North…
- There is no 'fast track' towards definitive conclusions regarding this topic.We need to immerse ourselves with both historical and more recent material. Here are just two simple examples.https://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.ft.com...I could only agree with the motion if you…
- 2458.
The Black Lives Matter movement is misguided
For
- "First off... It's common knowledge blacks are mistreated by police, and the court system." • Can you verify that this is true? I'm pretty sure this is a lie in itself. You can't keep bringing up these things and not prove them to be true.https://www.youtube.com...... Eric…
- Wow! My first opponent! Now to continue! "The cause itself is pure, it's a group of people black, or white raising awareness of how blacks are mistreated by police which is obvious, mistreated by the court system"How are Blacks mistreated by cops? Then again, it isn't race that…
Against
- My opponent presented a poorly third round. Yes, what I said is true. I provided evidence. Yes, Eric garner did die. (video of him dying) notice the cop in the greenish shirt. Yes, over 100 people are killed every year by cops (Didn't say black people specifically, but they do…
- My opponent opens his argument and rebuttals by these statements he made and I do quote "How are Blacks mistreated by cops? Then again, it isn't race that is the factor in how the cops treat Black people,it is how they respond to requests by the officer. " Then he goes on to…
- 2459.
Imprisoned Pussy Riot members should be considered political prisoners
For
- The focus of their song was one of political dissent rather than religion
- History of the Orthodox Church and the Russian state
Against
- If it was a purely political statement, then why stage it in a church?
- Intention
- 2460.
Separation of church and state should be absolute
For
- This is something that makes me really mad about this site. So many people love to start debates but refuse to finish them.
- Your arguments are about as confusing as the logic of the Westboro Baptist Church, but I'm confident I can handle them. First, a little history lesson. The founding fathers shaped the constitution of this nation on the philosophy of John Locke, a famous English philosopher.…
Against
- sorry about the dropped round. i don't always get on the computer daily. and it's the end of the trimester at school, i had three finals given today. i apologize. i further apologize, i hope to god that my argument wasn't THAT confusing. sorry. basically where i disagreed with…
- well, to a point i agree with you. in fact i'm not exactly sure where i stand on this issue, but i am debating a point of view i've advocated in speeches before. Good luck to you, alexrich, i hope this is a fun debate. Basically, the idea i am advocating is that Church and…
- 2461.
The United States alliance would win a total war against Russia
For
- Combined land area of Russia and her allies is 30,461,000 square km. Please note that I actually rounded up. Combined NATO land area is 26,837,355.93 square km. I didn't round up and I still would need to add the allies from the Rio pact which I don't feel like doing cause my…
- In most cases in terms of population and numbers on the ground the United States and her allies rival and or surpasses Russian and her allies numbers. Total Population: 1,669,449,961 Available Manpower: 781,078,501 Fit for Service: 632,293,219 Reaching Military Age Annually:…
Against
- Sources can easily be provided if need be. Russia and her allies would win in the event of a total war against the U.S. and her allies based on three main points. A.) Population Russia and, one of her main allies, China have a significantly larger population size than the…
- 2462.
The US should give unlimited visas
For
- I do have a problem with making an argument, when I feel my opponent will just forfeit next round. We'll follow the mutual forfeit rule devised awhile a go. If my opponent responds, you should tie the debate. If he doesn't, give me the point.Thanks, but it looks like this…
- Well, it turns out that I wont actually be able to post this round, do to my schedule, so I might as well inform my opponent. Good luck, and may we have a good debate.
Against
- I'm extremely sorry for the delay. I was a bit busy with my work. Firstly I would like to thank my opponent for posting this debate. It can be said that US has been founded on immigration since its birth.The very first people to live in US were immigrants from England if I'm…
- I accept this argument.
- 2463.
The United States should eliminate its welfare system
For
- Oh well, Happy New Years!
- I will offer the following argument with the expectation Con will come back to this debate-> Welfare helps people who can't afford to take care of themselves. By doing away with it completely we would be harming millions of people who would have nothing else to fall back on.…
Against
- I will be arguing that the United States of America should NOT totally eradicate the welfare system. Thank you for your acceptance. Good luck!
- 2464.
Same-sex marriage should not be legal, but civil unions should be
For
- straight couple can adopt. they are the only ones who should be able to adopt. gay parents is not natural. plus striaghts can in principle have kids even if they are impotent. they are inherentlu capable. gays are not. love isn't the only unit for a copule, kids and family is…
- straight mairrage even with infertile couples has the inherent possiblity to have kids. with gays, it is inherently impossible. if adoptions occur, it should include a man and a woman parents, as that reflects nature. also, man and woman are by nature couples designed to be…
Against
- Even though love is not the only reason for marriage, gays still have the option to adopt and start a family. Saying it is not natural is like saying that handicapped people are not natural and should be exempt from marriage and children If separate but equal is meant for…
- Straight couples with infertility have no way to have kids, unless through artificial insemination. This would be the same as the mothers wife being a step-dad to the child. I will state again that a marriage is not solely to have kids the main purpose is to create a bond of…
- 2465.
Believers in liberty should oppose a Palestinian state
For
- "This is a debate topic much older than either of us... I don't want to get personal but intuition tells me that you are asking a question in the that debate...This is a very very old contradiction in modern terms there are views that stretch the gambit from the Extreme…
- Thank you Ms. whatever your name is for taking up the debate, and i really enjoyed your style of presentation. With that being said let us discuss the issue. I was indeed cryptic in my argument why i think that the basis of liberty is the belief that all men are created equal,…
Against
- Unfortunately, Bias sourcing makes a solid refuting of your claims some what hard. You have chosen not to refute the historical evidence I have presented at the end the the last round but still labeled it as "propaganda" even though it is sourced to openly known and reasonably…
- This is a debate topic much older than either of us. What your getting at is a deep and fundamental contradiction in terms. I don't want to get personal but intuition tells me that you are asking a question in the that debate. There seemed to be conflicting thoughts about the…
- 2466.
Barack Obama was a bad president
For
- he has made a mess of things
Against
- Once again, my opponent has completely forfeited the debate. This is getting really annoying. Nonetheless,
- It seems my opponent has forfeited. I sincerely ask my opponent to not forfeit the next round and thus the whole debate, because lately alot of my other debaters have completely forfeited, and it is getting irritated.Nonetheless, I only have to show one way that Obama is good,…
- 2467.
A qualified Muslim candidate should be elected president
For
- I conceade on the grounds that i cant prove their is a obligation for a voter to vote for a muslim. I should have made the title clearer. I will make a debate titled would you vote for a muslim presidentail canidate if they where qualified and you agreed with their policies. I…
- I would have no problem voting for a muslim presidential canidate if i agreed with them. I will let my opponent start.
Against
- Concession -> Default CON -> I win.
- Well, I suppose that I don't even have to actually argue this topic then; PRO has openly conceded the debate to me; in the future, let this be a lesson that you have to be very specific with the way you word a topic. This is especially true for the topic that you're trying to…
- 2468.
The raid that killed Osama bin Laden was reckless
For
- Many thanks to XimenBao for his response.First of all let me point out that I had provided definition of terms in the introductory round. Those definitions are part of the debate. The voters should not permit Con to rely on an alternative definition for rebuttal - as that would…
- Definitions:The mission to kill Osama : Refers to the American raid in Pakistan which killed Osama bin Laden.Prima Facie: on its first appearance, or at first sightReckless act: Action characterized by or proceeding from carelessness Syntactic arguments are not allowed.==…
Against
- First, the definition debate. I did not offer an alternative definition. I pointed out that Pro chose to define a reckless act as a careless act, gave the definition of careless, and argued out that an act with over seven months of planning cannot be said to lack forethought or…
- I give two arguments. First, Pro's definition of a reckless act is an act proceeding from carelessness. Carelessness is in turn defined as "Marked by or resulting from lack of forethought or thoroughness" (1). The operation to capture or kill Osama was planned since August 2010…
- 2469.
Israel should continue to exist as a sovereign state
For
- I'm supposing you are forfeiting because you failed to attcack my contentions and instead made one general broad assault on the resolution. With a lack of contentions I'm not sure what you plan to do here.
- Israel is a legitimate country that should remain a country for these contentions: 1) Israel is a home land for the Jews, a safe place for Jews so they no Longer have to fear oppression from enemy groups like they have in the past by the Nazis, the egyptians and the Romans. If…
Against
- Your debate says should Israel be a country. It is. You are trying to debate that it should remain a country. That's the same thing as arguing that America should stay a country.
- State your case.
- 2470.
The US should remove 'In God We Trust' from currency
For
- " 1970 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled: "It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and currency 'In God We Trust' has nothing whatsoever to do with the establishment of religion. Its use is of patriotic or ceremonial…
- Thank You CON! 1. We should not lie on our currency, or imply that people are second class citizens on our currency2. If there is a lie, or some sort of indication that someone else is a second class citizen, we should take it off.3. There is a statement on our currency that is…
Against
- I was not avoiding the definition of second-class citizen. If you see in my previous argument I stated that I would be adding onto your definition of a second-class citizen; simply elaborating, not disregarding.Second-Class Citizen: A person who is not accorded a fair share of…
- Point One 1. We should not lie on our currency, or imply that people are second class citizens on our currencyIn 1970 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled: "It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and currency 'In God We…
- 2471.
Mosques near Ground Zero should be allowed to be built
For
- My opponent has forfeited a round. I encourage him to make a final argument in the last round. I also thank him for joining this debate.
- However, I would also like to remind my opponent of the terms of debate. org that prohibit cursing and profanity[1]. ---------- My opponent has agreed with my argument that the builders of the Islamic community center have the right to build it. While morally it is an arguable…
Against
- First of all I would like to say good luck :) ------------------------------------------------- My opponent has stated it is not a mosque and they are right it is a and I quote "A Islamic community center and prayer room planned near Ground Zero" and yes it is true they have a…
- 2472.
A new world order would benefit the well-being of humanity
For
- I made arguments. The opponent did not address these. Extend these arguments and vote for me. Thanks.
- Extend.
Against
- whats wrong with democracy??? it works fine, one world government is horrible isn't that why we broke away from England in the first place, to escape a monarch and chance of tyranny why would we back step all the way and further past that?
- 2473.
The government should be able to restrict protest if it weakens the military
For
- Well this debate has been boiled down to whether the resolution will increase military power so I will get right to it. More pro-war 1.First the example that my opponent give it flawed for 2 reasons, 1 because what to say that is what they will use as propaganda, what to say…
- On the first point to clarify what was said, I was saying that you dropped the value criterion from my first speech "So I affirm this topic with the values of utilitarianism though the criterion of protection" and then was showing how my newest contention linked to my value.…
Against
- My opponent first claims that the now ineffective types of propaganda would no longer be used. Instead, we would just have the same few types of propaganda, but more often than before. The big problem here is that people would notice this big of a change. Because we are so used…
- I didn't "drop" my opponent's value criterion. I don't know what kind of backwards world my opponent is living in, but there's nothing to rebut in "So I affirm this topic with the values of utilitarianism though the criterion of protection." You make your case through your…
- 2474.
The US should abandon the War on Terror
For
- This will be a team debate.Teams:Pro: ColeTrain, famousdebaterCon: fire_wings, everlastingmoment Rules:No trollingNo kritiksNo semanticsNo forfeitsMaintain a civil and decorous atmosphereCitations or foot/endnotes may be provided in the commentsNo new arguments in the final…
- :)Ineffectiveness Our opponents make a pronged attack here by initially attacking our news articles referencing broad-scale and worldwide terrorism. They claim that, because we haven't adequately funded Boko Haram, it is not a sufficient example. However, the War on Terror…
Against
- Thank you for the lengthy response, we will address our defense and combine rebuttals to solidify our stance and prove all our contentions and debunk theirs.Rebuttal & Defense - Ineffectiveness/EffectivenessOur opponents have completely misunderstood, at no point did we ever…
- Rebuttal one - Ineffectiveness Our opponents have naturally brought forward the case of it's ineffectiveness, but seeing the case that they have put forward makes me already question exactly how 'strongly' they researched into finding their evidence in relation to the War on…
- 2475.
Libertarianism is a better political philosophy than conservatism
For
- meow
- i
Against
- I accept this round as per condition of acceptance. Second round I will post opening arguments.
- As a radical conservative who is fundamentally opposed to libertarianism, I am really excited about the opportunity to defend my vision of conservatism. Whatever the outcome, I sincerely hope this debate helps clarify what conservatism is, and in doing so, helps illuminate the…
- 2476.
The United States government should limit freedom of speech
For
- ----My case---- Hatefull speech has to be banned to protect and promote democratic equality and human rights. ----My opponents case--- my opponent argues that the direct amendment of the freedom of speech is also an oppresion to the other persons rights however; he failed to…
- Thank you for accepting and sorry for the inconvenience. many countries have deliberately prohibited the use of "hateful speeches" under intensive laws to ensure the safety of its citizens. we have to take in consideration that the united states should limit the freedom of…
Against
- O Observation As I read my opponents speech I realized that this is about hate speech, anyhow as asked I won't address his speech in this round. O Definitions Hate Speech: speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.…
- Greetings, I suppose we will have to do two things in round three since there is no such thing as round four in this debate. Incidentally, Merry Christmas !!! I can't await, M
- 2477.
Donald Trump is not a racist
For
- Let me first point out that the actual definition of race is not as my opponent claims it is: {1}"a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock""an actually or potentially inter breeding group within a species""a category of humankind that shares certain…
- Racism has always been defined as discriminating against people on account of their race, and despite what the U.N. says, Islam is still not a race, Muslims are still a religious group not a racial group, and Donald Trump is still not discriminating against Muslims. If the…
Against
- First, I would like to point out that at the start of Round 2, I mentioned that my links did not paste properly in Round 1, and offered new links. Using the links from round 2, you will see that they refer to specific documentation showing that the UN has accepted…
- There are several issues with my opponents reasoning that I would like to point out.1) Pro states that "Racism has always been defined as discriminating against people on account of their race ... despite what the U.N. says" There are two issues with this statement:i) Pro…
- 2478.
Donald Trump was a better president than Barack Obama
For
- Since Donald Trump was elected in 2016, I think that he has proven to be better than the former president Barrack Obama. I will be posting four reasons in this round and the next as to not bombard you. I will not post any new arguments in the closing round as I wouldn't want…
- Hey fellow debaters. I am searching for an opponent to take the Con side that Donald Trump is better than Barrack ObamaThis debate will consist of 4 rounds. Round 1 will be Acceptance/greeting. You can also put here anything you want to clarify such as from which standpoint you…
Against
- Sad
- Oh no. Don't give up!
- 2479.
Republicans are not 'racist' as commonly alleged
For
- Many thanks to CON for challenging me in a debate. I wish him the absolute best of luck. This debate, as I stated above will be about debunking the stereotypes of the Republican party being the party of racists. ArgumentsLet's take a look back at history shall we? The…
- Hello everyone, I would like to debate politics about how the Republican party is not racist. I believe if anything, they're horribly stereotyped because most of the party consists of white Americans. First round is for acceptance. Thank you very much.
Against
- Even Republicans think Republicans are RacistOne need not go to the democratic side of politics to confirm that the Republican Party is racist. Plenty of confirmation can be found by asking prominent Republicans. They should know, after all.Here is Colin Powell's Chief of…
- Obviously, it would be a mistake to stereotype every member of the Republican Party as racist. As Bill Maher once quipped, "You don't have to be a racist to be a Republican, but if you are a racist, you are probably going to vote Republican. " I don't suppose that Republican…
- 2480.
Extreme gun control is a bad idea
For
- Due to my opponents absence. We can conclude that he has either quit, or could not come up with a rebuttal to prove me wrong. Until he is able to prove an argument, we can assume he can offer no alternative.
- I will start from the standpoint that gun regulation can be a good thing, when it is limited. As i stated above, small regulation can be a good thing. Such as better back ground checks or maybe even initiating a mental health mandate into the mix Since your response was simple,…
Against
- Listen, if we don't have extreme gun control, MORE PEOPLE WILL DIE! Listen. If you don't have gun regulation controls, people whow own guns might kill someone, like Zimmerman, thus causing another death.
- 2481.
The federal government should defund Planned Parenthood
For
- Contention 1: Kant's Categorical ImperiativesP1.The Government should only act to enforce the imperatives of Perfect Duties.P2. Abortion does not meet the standard of a Perfect Duty.C1: Thus, the Government should not act to enforce abortion through the funding of planned…
- I accept. Get ready for Round 2!
Against
- Thanks for accepting, I'm sure we're going to have a great debate. Contention 1: Planned Parenthood is a key contributor to biomedical research PP is a uniqe and difficult to replace contributer to medical researchers. They donate a large supply of stem cells which is hard to…
- Round 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Contentions, no rebuttalsRound 3: More contentions, no rebuttalsRound 4: Rebuttals. No defense of arguments allowedRound 5: Defense of argumentsRules1. Please keep the discussion of the morality of abortion out of this debate, for it is an entire…
- 2482.
The United States should pay reparations to descendants of slavery
For
- Before I conclude this debate, My opponent hasn't made any logical sense what-so-ever. Case In Point: He said that "the reason for racial disparity in the US is because we haven't perfected a proper solution. " That statement alone destroys his entire rambling argument. . . You…
- The very first thing my opponent said is "reparations will not solve any problems. " Did you not say that? If not, Then scroll back up a few notches to refresh your memory. That ridiculous statement alone is illogical sir. Your next misstep claimed that I created a false…
Against
- So I guess you never had any intentions of actually bringing proofs to the debate. Makes me wonder what's in that suitcase of yours. You called my question rhetorical and then refused to answer it for the second time. It's cool I know the answer and so do you. That's why you…
- You said: "That ridiculous statement alone is illogical sir. " You can't just claim it's illogical, You have to explain why it's illogical or it stands. You obviously don't know what a false dichotomy is. I said "racial disparity can't be bought away. " Then you said: "So, Why…
- 2483.
America is a Christian nation that should be governed by the Bible
For
- Well, that concludes this debate.
- My opponent has argued that "Majority Rules" has never been set into action in the history of our nation.However, this is untrue. He has stated that minority parties can overrule the majority parties' legislations, but the only way to override a bill or legislation is with a…
Against
- I apologise to my opponent, but I am forced to forfiet this debate. Final exams are coming up, and I no longer have tje time to debate.
- 1."In America's democracy where majority rules, why does this not apply to religion?"Here my opponent asserts that in our American democracy, the majority rules. Since the majority rules and said majority is Christian, then America should rule according to the Bible.There are…
- 2484.
Undocumented immigrants should be granted amnesty
For
- Although immigrants do not pay all the taxes that American citizens pay, they still propose many benefits to the United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been proven that immigrants have improved on the federal dept in the country. The article "Expanding…
- Believe it or not, a the majority of illegal immigrants do pay taxes according to Nick Gillespie and company"s text "Immigration Now, Immigration Tomorrow, Immigration Forever". Many argue that illegal immigrants do not pay taxes, but in reality, they pay the majority of taxes…
Against
- It is unfair that immigrants get to stay in the United States because their children were born here. Although their children are technically citizens, illegal immigrants should not be able to stay in the Nation and send their kids to public school paid for by the taxes of…
- Immigrants are not paying the income tax that all American citizens pay from their salaries. According to Jim DeMint, "An exhaustive study by the Heritage Foundation has found that after amnesty, current unlawful immigrants would receive $9.4 trillion in government benefits and…
- 2485.
The Republican Party will define America's future
For
- A few corrections I would like to make: "Low taxations allows for more job growth, because that way the businesses are stripped by the government of their money." I meant to say "because that way the businesses aren't stripped by the government of their money." So I…
- Thank you. Yes they are the future. Small government allows for businesses to trade and do their business without someone interferring in them. Low taxations allows for more job growth, because that way the businesses are stripped by the government of their money. The Democrats…
Against
- A few corrections I would like to make: "Low taxations allows for more job growth, because that way the businesses are stripped by the government of their money." I meant to say "because that way the businesses aren't stripped by the government of their money." So I…
- Small government only produces deficits in a first world nation and small government cannot provide for societal needs of its many citizens. You can not have a small government in a highly technological, industrialized nation. Low taxation only brings about huge deficits as we…
- 2486.
Wealthy countries should relax immigration laws
For
- Ladies and gentlemen, tonight I would like to talk about whether or not governments in rich countries should relax the laws controlling immigration. Before going into my arguments I would like to define key terms of the motion. Firstly, I define 'rich countries' as developed…
Against
- Waste of my time.
- Opponent forfeited round, extend all arguments from previous speech.
- 2487.
Donald Trump's policies have been racist
For
- My argument extends.
- My argument extends.
Against
- Donald Trump is a candidate for the Republican party who is often called a racist by many Democrats as a form of argument why he should not be president. Donald Trump is no racist and may be the least racist candidate. Donald Trump has been endorsed and has many minority people…
- 2488.
Donald Trump is sensationalised by media outside the United States
For
- The negative seems to be highly against the views and opinions of Donald Trump. However, I believe that these views and opinons are those of a sensationalised presidential candidate. How is it possible for a racist, stereotypical person to run for the highly exclusive role as…
- One point stands out within the case of the negative... he seems poised to win. Elections take place across America to decide which president would be the best for the country. Is the negative stating that all Americans are stupid for voting for an insane and racist leader. Is…
Against
- Trump has repeatedly made derogatory comments towards Mexicans such as how they are all "rapists and murderers". How is there any other way that that could be taken other than racism. Then there is his views on Muslims which are based on the generalisation that all Muslims are…
- Donald Trump doesn't need to be sensationalised, his policies are just so crazy that the rest of the world cannot comprehend why so many Americans have been voting for them. From the point of the view of the rest of the world, for the last 8 years, America has been run by a…
- 2489.
Government should give preferential treatment based on race or gender
For
- Well basically you've agreed with my points in the last round. I have nothing to say except for that affirmative action is applicable to create equallity sometimes.
- Affirmative action is applacible in some cases. For instance, often a black man may go to jail just for his race. This has happened many times in many cases. The court system can't say, we won't give him a fair trial because if we do, we'll have to give a fair one to the white…
Against
- This topic is all about preferential treatment of people based on race or gender, otherwise known as affirmative action. Affirmative action is wrong because: 1) It is the very thing it intends to destroy. It boosts the status of minorities above the majority so they can feel…
- Affirmative action is applicable in some cases. -I do agree with you on this point. For instance, often a black man may go to jail just for his race. This has happened many times in many cases. -I know. But there is a difference in affirmative action and treating people as…
- 2490.
India plays a crucial role in sustaining democracy in South Asia
For
- The condition of Southern Asia is chaotic because the disturbed Government in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Also nations like Pakistan are quite famous as the promoter and supporter of terrorism and has faced many Military Coup. Only India has the stable government in whole south…
Against
- Thank you.
- Thank you.
- 2491.
Liberalism seeks to absolve people of personal responsibility
For
- I only saw a very short and seemingly ignorant opening and figured it was just stupid liberal bashing. I by no means meant to be rude. No matter: MY REPLY: No worries. No offense taken. ------------------------------------------ Welfare I assume you realize that all the money…
- Let me address each of the individual points first, then I'll summarize: ----------------------------------------- YOU: Increased welfare benefits: -So were holding children and people unable to work, responsible for their own being if we dont have increased welfare? Welfare,…
Against
- Welfare: First off, you assume that every penny that the government uses would automatically go to welfare sytle chrity were there to be no welfare tax. Beyond that, many charitable ocntributions go to places like church or city projects. The closest thing to a substantial…
- I only saw a very short and seemingly ignorant opening and figured it was just stupid liberal bashing. I by no means meant to be rude. No matter: We are removing our responsibility to give to charity, support our parents, friends and fellow human beings who need it and placing…
- 2492.
Israel's military campaign in Gaza is justified
For
- All right I will respect your win here but I will not give up when I have done your requested reshearch I will make a come back, but you might what to check your spelling more carefully. "Needless to say, the situation is not as black and white as you seem to thing." This is a…
- O.k. I admit that I should not quote the bible in this debate, but put the U.S. in Israel's shoes... would you sit down and do nothing after being bombed non-stop for to years. any reasonable person would say no. It is only common sense to fight back. All I am saying is that…
Against
- Now you're being childish. A tiny typing error (I know full well how to spell "think") doesn't change the fact that you don't know what you're talking about. It is unfortunate that this experience has not taught you to save the formation of your opinions until you know the facts.
- This is laughable. Your speculation as to what the U. S. would do in Israel's place is entirely irrelevant. Furthermore, "common sense" is is not proof of anything. There is NO SUCH THING. It is simply a phrase thrown around by ignorant people, twisted into whatever suits them.…
- 2493.
Barack Obama was a failed president
For
- In order to uphold the resolution, I must show that Obama is a failure. According to a CNN article [1] Obama's Foreign policy is dismal. With not punishing Syrian's use for chemical weapons, to Egypt's self-destruct being not only failed to stop by the president, but they…
- I thank Con for a wonderful debate!
Against
- Obama doesn't have real control over the economy or budget. The power lies with the Senate and Congress
- He may have failed to put a stop to the NSA spying, but he didn't organize or start it.[1] SO, if you have a gun, and someone else is murdered in front of, but you don't get involved, is it murder on your fault? It's a crime, yes, but it it full fledged murder? No. Can you be…
- 2494.
Background checks on gun sales should be required
For
- Background checks are a way that the government keeps guns out of known criminals' hands and people with mental health issues, without infringing upon the rights of normal citizens. By screening people who want to buy a gun, many criminals are prevented from buying guns. Many…
- I feel like doing a very short, fast, debate. Note that there is a very small character limit, I want this to be short and sweet. 1st round is acceptance ONLY. Cartoon/political poster/ picture is necessary to be attached with each argument. Polite conduct expected at all…
Against
- Accepted.
- .
- 2495.
Multiculturalism is a burden on a nation
For
- I do need to comment, I am not an American. I am talking in the context of European countries. I am a fan of diversity. However, when another culture is becoming the majority of another country, that is where I draw the line. Now, you can put this in context of tourism and…
- I am in a country which is currently at risk from another culture taking over. I believe in diversity, and I am fine with other races being present. However, when a country is getting overrun with another culture that is not "it's own", that's where I draw the line.
Against
- I apologize. I had made the assumption that you lived in America as that seems to be a big issue because of our president. Alright. England. Got it. I now better understand where you are coming from. If you could give me sources to prove your point that would be great (I'm not…
- There's the American stereotype, of course, but there's no solid American culture. It's a multi-cultural country where the Salad Bowl theory is the more popular ideology (as it should be). Because America has a plethora of a variety of different races and cultures, the Melting…
- 2496.
Abortion should be banned in the United States
For
- give me 3 reason why we should keep it?
- hell yeah it should be banned its murder simple!!!
Against
- Extend all arguments.
- Extend all arguments.
- 2497.
Governments should use video games to counter ISIS recruitment
For
- The information may be a little off because it was in 2011 and I treating Isis like gangs because there similar excluding mass killings which Isis does. "Opportunity to make money, thrill seeking, protection from bullies, desire for prestige, and a chance to belong are the main…
- Clubs, activities and sport are available in a lots of places but not in small rural areas. Have you ever had that feeling that you don't want to live but just skip a couple years. Its happened to me and sometimes you what to spice up your life which can be good some people…
Against
- Overall, just because two things are similar or have the same qualities doesn't mean they are the same, or should be treated the same. Although not completely different, gangs and Isis have no clear link - and any evidence found to link them together has unfortunately never…
- Only 14 percent of teens are in gangs and the average age for a gang member is 17 to 18 years old, so whilst keeping them entertained/ not bored may help and prevent gangs; will sport and video games really work on youth of that age ? Opportunity to make money, thrill seeking,…
- 2498.
The military appearance of rifles makes them more dangerous
For
- Through this argument, I would like to indicate how an aggressive design in rifles may affect the psychological mentality and behavior in criminals. Let's look at the psychological effects that the rifle appearance may trigger on shooters: 1- Confidence: it will empower and…
- The position I will be defending is that not only technical and mechanical features of rifles merit consideration for their classification, but also their appearances. Hunting rifles are excluded from the debate. Debating this topic will help people decide what guns should fall…
Against
- As the resolution states, this debate is about how the appearance of rifles is their most dangerous aspect. Has the appearance of a rifle ever killed someone? No. Has the ammunition of a rifle being shot out of it ever killed someone? Yes. Has the rifle used as a blunt object…
- I accept. Begin your argument.
- 2499.
Individuals should not have the right to own firearms
For
- Firstly I would like to respond directly to some of Con's claims and statistics, which I believe are misleading, to put it kindly. To begin with, I have to immediately counter Con's claim that the 31 states that allow concealed carry on firearms have a 24% lower violent crime…
- Opening Arguments against private ownership of firearmsI would like to open with a few statistics and examples. The USA has a higher proportion of gun-involved homicides carried out than almost all countries where private gun ownership is illegal. It is only beaten by…
Against
- And now to respond to my opponents 3rd round. >> "To begin with, I have to immediately counter Con's claim that the 31 states that allow concealed carry on firearms have a 24% lower violent crime rate etc. There are actually 48 states which have laws which allow the concealed…
- For clarification, I am missing a source from my round 2 argument which supports several claims [1]. Anyhow, to refute my opponents argument from round 2.>> "The USA has a higher proportion of gun-involved homicides carried out than almost all countries where private gun…
- 2500.
'Under God' should remain in the Pledge of Allegiance
For
- Con tries to equate "Nature's God" with "Laws of Nature", "science", and "God", but that's wrong. "Nature's God" refers to the God who created nature, or "The God of Nature". Indeed, that is what Jefferson, who was a Deist, meant by the phrase!Here is a quote by Jefferson to…
- Our nation is not based on solely secular principles. It's based primarily on the principle of God-given rights. (1) You claim America was founded mostly by deists, not Christians. I don't know why you mentioned that. I never argued either way. It doesn't change the fact that…
Against
- Jefferson doesn't refer in the Declaration of Independence to "our" God- he refers to "Nature's God." To understand his intent you must be intellectually honest. Jefferson rejected religion every chance he got, as did many of the Founding Fathers. When a deist speaks of God, he…
- My opponent did me the favor of proving my point in Round 2 by trying to reiterate his false claim in his Round 2 argument. There is a huge difference between Jefferson's reference to "Nature's God," which is a Deist sentiment, and the suggestion that referencing God is…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?