Politics Debate Topics — page 39
3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1901.
Class struggle remains as important today as ever
For
- With thanks to my opponent's continued interest in this debate, I should like to respond as follows: I did, in fact, take my opponent's point about the oil companies' profits being modest compared to the tax, but the point I was making was that the people should benefit from…
- With thanks to my opponent for taking this debate, I would like to respond as follows: With regard to the oil companies' profits, 8% is actually quite a good return, and, indeed, represents a lot of money. For example the London-based oil company Shell reported profits of…
Against
- "...the people should benefit from the tax revenues AND the profits." Why should they benefit from the profits? The benefit they ALREADY get from the profits is that the company they are buying the product or service from is staying in business and continuing to provide that…
- "With regard to the oil companies' profits, 8% is actually quite a good return..." You missed my point entirely. Although 8% is a good return (Which they EARNED! They work hard to keep the world economy from slowing down to a trickle, not to mention keeping the standard of…
- 1902.
Cluster bombs should be banned worldwide
For
- Over-armament with cluster bombs is threat to peace
- Rejection of cluster bomb ban damages US image
Against
- A cluster bomb ban would jeopardize joint peacekeeping operations.
- A cluster bomb ban will undermine military alliances
- 1903.
Right-leaning politics are better than left-leaning
For
- Yes every person has as much a likely chance to die because we have no control over that. Like you said only God does, but I would like to say that if God is killing lefties at a younger age like your argument suggests wouldn't that mean that he favors the other. Indeed this is…
- .. Righties are better than lefties for but another reason too. So you know how it has been proved that women live longer than men. .. Well righties have been proved to live longer than lefties. I ask how you think this is not a better thing. To live longer due to you using…
Against
- Um, okay. This was fun! :)
- Uh, okay. I agree with what you said. But in my opinion, I don't have a favorite hand, but it's kind of rude to just go up to a lefty( If you are right handed) and say" Oh I'm better than you because I was born this way" or " Ha ha oh your a lefty." or something like that. And…
- 1904.
Texas should be allowed to secede and become independent
For
- With many thanks to my opponent for his eloquent and comprehensive rebuttal, I should like to apologise in advance for the brevity of my reply - I only have a very short window of time before the deadline is up, and it thought it better to write something, no matter how brief,…
- Texas is the only state that was an independent nation before joining the Union and today Texans are still very independent people and extremely proud of their heritage. [1] These days, many Texans feel that their interests are not being properly represented at a federal level…
Against
- Recap In the previous round I refuted the relevance of Pros argument and made two contentions of my own. In this round Pro did not acknowledge my rebuttals or my contentions, and continued what I have already shown to be an irrelevant argument. I extend my previous argument…
- Due to strict character limits my arguments will be brief. US: the United States of America Resolution The resolution states that Texas must be allowed to become an independent sovereign nation if it so chooses. By the word "must" I interpret this to indicate that the US has no…
- 1905.
Communism could work in theory
For
- To say communism or communist leaders cannot form a stable economy is false. Yes the government may be eventually run by bureaucrats, regardless the fundamental idea behind communism is that people are given exactly what they need. In some countries like that of Cuba there are…
- To begin I would like to make it crystal clear what communism is. Communism: a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state. This means that there is no social…
Against
- extend
- Ok, let me get this strait, If human nature was not a problem, communist would coexist happily with a nations capitalists, whilst also robbing them of money they earned by gunpoint. That is essentially what communism is. As to a bureaucrat based economy, has this ever worked in…
- 1906.
Direct democracy is fairer than representative democracy
For
- 1. You say that most people are uneducated in politics. The solution to this is that the goverment gives the people the information they need about politics so that the uneducated masses can get educated.2.In countries such as Australia and the United States,people can't vote…
- Direct Democracy can be good for a lot of things. For example...1.The people get to write and vote on laws,rather than a republic where represententives make the laws. This means,in a direct democracy,anybody can12s have a chance to vote and create a law and hold daily national…
Against
- The good things you mention are in reality the flaws of a direct democracy. 1. You have anyone making laws for a nation that everyone in that nation has to follow. This is just not a good idea as most people are uneducated on politics, and what works best. 2. Ill Admit that it…
- This is the definition of direct democracy I am using, "Direct democracy (also known as pure democracy) is a form of democracy in which people decide (e.g. vote on, form consensus on) policy initiatives directly." My argument is that direct democracy is inferior, and not…
- 1907.
The US government should substantially increase investment in Africa
For
- I'm not going to spend time arguing the conduct statements, as I think my point was rather well made. Anyways, this debate is about Africa, and not him. I will also throw out the refutation rule as a courtesy, as I also refuted after my opponent in R1. I have also decided to…
- Note to my opponent, I have only made one argument for why we should end suffering, and it did not involve raising any budgets.I will also remind him that I was expecting a more thorough argument, not relied on 90% by quotations, but let me begin none the less. I have…
Against
- Two things to bring up:First, my opponent went and extended the debate whereas the rules clearly state that we both had to talk about this and agree to it before saying that we would use round 4 for more arguments. He never did talk about it with me, nor did he ever "reserve…
- I don't even know what to say. Jifpop just doesn't even respond to anything I say other than saying I'm using philosophy other than stats and then attacks my conduct. I guess just extend out my case as unresponded to. He doesn't respond to any of my responses to his case…
- 1908.
The Affordable Care Act has done more good than harm
For
- As stated. Looking through the depths of the inter webs, you find the majority of its dwellers are in major opposition against American National Healthcare, which I then ask them and myself, why? If accepted, please prepare to provide links to all information. Remember, Logic…
- I will begin by addressing your refutations on my statements. "*Reply: As I listed on #4 above, even if lower insurance premiums was the "entire objective" (I have completely destroyed that claim) That goal was also a huge failure because costs are going way up after Obamacare…
Against
- I am against the ACA (Obamacare) for the specific reason that what we were promised is not what we received. Everything from Obama's lie of the year : http://www.politifact.com... To the stated goal of the ACA to get all the uninsured into healthcare plans and to stop using…
- Wow, a lot of personal attacks on me calling me lazy and such but you dodged every single point and question I asked. I ask if you believe we should ignore every promise made by Obama and the democrats to pass the ACA and you dodge. I ask you to go number by number and reply to…
- 1909.
The United States should be concerned about China's leadership changes
For
- I beg to differ that by changing the leaders, it is merely changing the face of the party, and not the party itself. The Politburo that is being sworn in would ultimately change the direction of the party and where it is headed. With the changing in leaders, the Chinese…
- China has recently had a change in leadership within the China Communist Party, from Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao to Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang. As a new generation of leaders in China rises, should China be a cause of worry for the America as they are now completely unable to be…
Against
- You do realise that you have assumed that since there was an alteration in the relations of Vietnam, China and USA during the time of the rising to power of Xi Jinping that he is thus conspiring against USA...I am seeing you taking a seemingly obvious coincidence and turning it…
- If you actually read the news http://www.bbc.co.uk...You would realise that in actuality the party, policies and entirity of China's relations to USA remain identical to what they were before, it's merely changing the face of the party, not the party itself.
- 1910.
Welfare programs in the United States should be abolished
For
- Unfortunately my opponent has decided to forfeit the round... Extend arguments.
- Welfare is wrong for a multitude of reasons:MonetarilyThe money put into welfare is a ridiculous amount. This year (2011) the government spent 700 billion dollars on welfare (just unemployment "benefits"). Add government health care, Medicare and Medicaid and you get a whopping…
Against
- I accept.
- 1911.
Voting in elections is always better than abstaining
For
- VOTING ISSUES My opponent concedes that not-voting has ZERO advantages while VOTING has at least some advantages. Therefore, on balance, you must vote PRO.In this debate I don't need to prove that voting is "the best thing you can do" nor that our electoral system is perfect. I…
- Cheers! WE AGREE THAT IT IS BETTER TO VOTE MOST OF THE TIME I am glad that my opponent agrees that it's better to vote most of the time. However, he posits three claims in negation of my resolution. I will refute each of his claims with the following contentions. [1] IT's…
Against
- Con Voting Is Always Better Than Not Voting. My opponent states that he doesn't need to prove that: " voting is "the best thing you can do" nor that our electoral system is perfect. I only need to prove that voting is BETTER than not-voting." That's really not correct he must…
- Voting is widely thought to be one of the most important things a person can do. But the reasons people give for why they vote and why everyone else should too are flawed, unconvincing, and sometimes even dangerous. The case for voting relies on factual errors,…
- 1912.
Arab Spring revolutions can create stable democracies
For
- Islamic parties have led governments before
- There are preexisting institutions in Arab countries.
Against
- Rentier economies lead to dictatorships.
- The west only supports democracies that fit with its world view.
- 1913.
The US military should reinstate Don't Ask, Don't Tell
For
- What we agree onYou have done an excellent job in your response. There are many things that we agree upon, so let me start there. As I stated in my original argument "Let me first acknowledge that homosexuals Americans, like all Americans, are patriotic and love their country…
- Let me first acknowledge that homosexuals Americans, like all Americans, are patriotic and love their country , however, the long held Military principle that homosexuality is fundamentally incompatible with Military service remains correct. Below you will find statistics and…
Against
- First off, it should be noted that the idea of homosexuals serving in the military is not a new one. Often, the strongest, most cohesive military forces in the world would readily accept gays into their ranks, believing that the stronger morale bond between men that gays had…
- I will be arguing that homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the military.
- 1914.
Military service should be compulsory for all citizens
For
- Military service gives youth great responsibilities
- Mandatory military service will cure many of society's ills
Against
- Conscripts never as good as professional soldiers
- Only young pay price of involuntary military service.
- 1915.
Countries should build physical barriers on their borders
For
- Illegal immigration is unfair to legal immigrants.
- "Good fences make good neighbors"
Against
- Illegal immigrants will simply go around a 700 mile fence
- Greater border efforts actually incentivizes more organized crime:
- 1916.
The United States is the greatest country in the world
For
- United States of America- Superior Military Japan is a great economic giant but it is not the greatest military power. Every transaction is done in dollars and not in yet because Yen is weak in the international market. US is also a Military Superpower. The US Army has the most…
- One Nation under God- United States of America Like Augustine once said, "There is a God sized void in every man's heart that only God can fill." A world without United States is the most dangerous thing that could happen to this world. Only a Super power could fill that void…
Against
- Ok look, we all know the US is one of 5 Economic Superpowers in the world, but let's look at crime: Safety is important in determining a countries level of Reasonable Arrogance. So naturally Crime is looked in to. And boy, let me tell you, this will be FUN! Because the USA…
- Once again your wrong. Japan is the closes to the US in terms of Economic Power. According to the UN, Japan has a Positive influnce in every nation on earth except 2: North Korea and China. The US has a positive influnce on less nations then Japan. In reality, the world could…
- 1917.
A stateless anarchist society would be preferable
For
- I"ll begin by addressing my opponent"s second contention first, because I believe its defense is foundational to any foundation for the first. I believe that our original need for a government was part of the evolutionary process. Although theories regarding social evolution…
- The premise referred to above is that "such a[n anarchist] state could exist functionally and would be ideal". I will make my first round brief. Although I'm sure some contention will arise as to whether such a state could exist functionally, I'll spend my time here explaining…
Against
- == Rebuttals == Pro seems to be using two, incompatible ideas. They define Anarchy as the "absence of government" while simultaneously admitting that a governing force is necessary to preserve basic order and justice. Pro says that FORMAL government is unnecessary in an "eye…
- Pro's position consists of two central claims: 1. An Anarchist state could functionally exist 2. An Anarchist state is ideal (i.e., the best way for a society to operate) Pro's job is to show compelling, logical evidence for both of these claims. If they cannot, or if they can…
- 1918.
The US should extend the Mexico border fence along the Gulf coast to Florida
For
- I will be arguing that the US should Jettison the state of Florida out of the union and then subsequently build a border wall along the US-Florida border to stop the influx of crazy that illegally pours into the United States from Florida First round acceptance only. 4000…
- 1) Lebron James"We mere mortals of course, being humble subjects to the goddess Nike and King James's Bible, are "Witnesses" to one of the greatest circle-jerks in American history, and it"s about time we all hop aboard the bandwagon express to Miami so that we might all…
Against
- Everlasting? Please..... The trio will come to an end when some racist mexican stalks and shoots one of them and then claim it was self defense, everyone knows that. Heresy much? You ask most Americans right now who the President is, and most will say it's LeBron. Everyone who…
- I don"t about you sir, but I for one plan on retiring on a Florida beach resort, next to one of those fancy PGA golf courses that have aligators of course. But here are my arguments for why we all ought to live in Florida and why the government ought to build a wall around the…
- 1919.
US presidents should serve two non-consecutive terms
For
- The advantage you speak of in the returning president to most likely be elected again is correct. The question is if this is the correct event to happen. Many people when they go into the voting poll and vote on which president they want to be elected are bias to the person…
- Presidents campaign for becoming Presidents. then get elected. But while elected are they worrying about how to run the country or are they worrying about getting elected elected again. Terms that are split apart can get rid of this distraction to the President. When they get…
Against
- Considering I provided rebuttal last round and in this debate burdon of proof rest with Pro since the proposed changed is what he is advocating, I find I have nothing to do this round.So for those reading this debate, your probably someone who gets into politics enough to find…
- Low information voters tend to pick the same incumbent president so the incumbent Advantage is Bad: Is it really? Just because the people swayed to stay the course are not the upmost informed voters there is out there. If the better choice really hinges on there knowing better…
- 1920.
The Council on Foreign Relations has too much influence over US foreign policy
For
- Now Bee, listen, there's organization which is always appreciated… and then there's this spreading out thing that you do which makes something that should be 1 page into 3. Lol, I implore you to see that there is a difference. =P Do Founders Really Matter: My opponent has…
- --Background/Points:-- Definition of Marxism: The political and economic philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under…
Against
- RE:sponse mode. ======== RE: Marxism ======== Frankly, it matters not what the founder believed in. The truth is that policy recommendations from the CFR do not reflect a Marxist approach to politics. When the founder died, whatever he wanted to do through the organization died…
- First I'll respond to my opponent's opening arguments, then I'll make my own case if necessary. ======== Background / Points: ======== My opponent explains the origins of the organization. Few actual points here, though there is an unspoken point about the Marxist views of the…
- 1921.
Countries should adopt proportional representation
For
- Coalition government is a good thing.
- PR produces fairer results
Against
- PR creates an unfair balance of power.
- Extremist parties will rise under PR.
- 1922.
A world government would be desirable
For
- A world government would enhance the probability of mitigating global environmental problems
- Economic globalization suggests the need for political globalization
Against
- A world government would be ineffective in practice
- There is no feasible transition path to a world government model
- 1923.
American political leaders serve themselves rather than the public
For
- Incorrect.
- If the big dogs aren't blowing the money, then why are there artificial private islands being made, that are even mobile mind you, and houses worth over millions of dollars. Tell me that's necessary. While the people down here are working every day to put food on the plate.…
Against
- If the big dogs aren't blowing the money, then why are there artificial private islands being made, that are even mobile mind you, and houses worth over millions of dollars. Those two are completely unrelated to each other. Just because dogs aren't blowing money (for they'll…
- I believe they are because no one can deny the direction this country is heading, Well, that depends where you think this country is heading. I can deny that this country is heading towards a zombie apocalypse but I could say that I don't deny that this country is heading for…
- 1924.
The UN should repeal all economic sanctions on Iran
For
- I'll put it plain and simple: con forfeited. This is an auto-win for me, even after my concession. I hope that the voters can see past my original blunder to what has happened.
- I feel that I cannot argue my case. I cannot argue that UN should repeal all economic sanctions on Iran. This was my mistake; I saw my opponents first argument, and thought it was an argument, not merely the title of the debate posted again. In my defense, this debate was not…
Against
- UN should repeal all economic sanctions on Iran
- 1925.
New Zealand should become a republic
For
- As I stated in my my last argument I stated "the prime minister holds the power at any time to dismiss the governor-general at any time" in your example for 1975 that the prime minister was dismissed by the governor-general it was only because the prime minister hadn't picked…
- "Is New Zealand to continue to have an appointed Governor-General... or should we move to an elected president? This will not happen because of any lack of affection or love for our Queen in London, but because the tide of history is moving in one direction." - former Prime…
Against
- As he didn't have a lot to say, I don't have a lot to say in response. This debate can be put down to three main issues: 1. Are we in a constitutional crisis? I maintain that the governor-general is as explicit a safeguard as you could want, within the bounds of parliamentary…
- First, I'd like to welcome my opponent to this debate. It's good to see more New Zealanders on DDO. What I've heard from the affirmative team is really a very elaborate and intellectual elaboration on only two arguments. The first is that the queen does nothing for New Zealand.…
- 1926.
Communism can never work
For
- I feel that I came into the debate with a flase view of communism and sabaren has made it correcrt. I also agree with his point of view now I fully understand communism and resign from this debate.
- Communism is a good idea but it can never work because if everyone gets paid the same amount then there is no incentive for people to work hard. Also if the state owns everything then people can never feel safe as they could lose everything. Also with communism leaders who…
Against
- extend
- Thank you for the polite response. And don't worry that you didn't fully understand communism most don't really know. I hope you learned something from this debate. Have a good one.
- 1927.
Flag desecration should be legal
For
- Thank you for your quick and thoughtful response! "What gives it precedence over the Flag code?" The first amendment is in the constitution, and the flag code is not. "Oppression: unjust or cruel exercise of authority or power" Here's a tip for debating. When someone provides a…
- Thank you for responding! "This amendment is the whole problem, it does let us say what we want to say without the government preventing us, but the problem here is that people take advantage of this amendment and do whatever they want to because the government can't stop us…
Against
- "Here's a tip for debating. When someone provides a definition which may not entirely be to your favor, always check the dictionary. Did you look at 1B? "Something that oppresses especially in being an unjust or excessive exercise of power. " I feel like it is excessively using…
- This debate has gotten interesting, this is going to be hard to counter you. "I must say, though, that if it contradicts the constitution, the constitution wins. In other words, if I say that flag desecration is protected by the first amendment, and you say it is illegal…
- 1928.
Foreign aid should be conditional on human rights records
For
- Tying aid to human rights puts pressure on countries to act responsibly
- Jordanian journalists protest a 48% increase in U.S funding after a negative report by human rights' watch on the Jordanian govt
Against
- Government and citizens are often not the same entity.
- 1929.
The United States is the greatest nation
For
- I'm sorry you couldn't finish the debate.
- America is the Greatest Nation. The greatest of all the nations. Yes. And what can such a statement mean? There are three ways to interpret it: as a slogan, An opinion or an assessment. I will address these in turn. 1. As a slogan. Florida is the sunshine state. Denmark is the…
Against
- I personally identify as a very patriotic America, I love this country to the point where I would be willing to lay down my life for it but I can not allow my patriotism to blind me from what I see as the truth that America is no longer the greatest nation. The land once known…
- I do not really see your argument, I think your making a joke?
- 1930.
Economic sanctions should not be used to achieve foreign policy goals
For
- I'm not sure that I understood my opponent's arguments in their entirety due to grammar and spelling, but I will address them to the best of my abilities in this final round. I point out first and most importantly that my opponent has failed to provide any evidence or sources…
- My opponent has conceded all of my points and offered no evidence to the contrary. He has not shown that economic sanctions are moral or in any way uphold societal welfare. He even states that sanctions are intrinsically unsuccessful and are in fact a form of economic war…
Against
- The argument is sanctions shouldn't be used to achieve foreign policy objectives, not if there morale which is all you're argument is saying and which was you're rebuttal 1. Economic sanctions are better than war, there more effective, few if any have to die and it doesn't…
- I do not believe that sanctions are made to be successful, and i also agree that they target innocent civilians but that would be the point, crippling the economy of a country and having its people unhappy with the way that there leader is handling it, yes smuggling does become…
- 1931.
The US should send ground troops to fight ISIS in Syria
For
- Ok well hit me what do you disagree with then. I mean that is how we controlled Al Queda after 9/11.
- Last time we had a big threat we needed ground forces. This time we need ground forces. There is absolutely no way we can take out a force as great as Isis by just air strikes.
Against
- I accept your challenge
- No I don't support ground troops I was just explaining that just because you send ground troops doesn't mean you stop drone strikes. Drone Strikes actually increase I believe we should just back out of the middle east and let the middle east deal with ISIS Even drone strikes in…
- 1932.
Voting should be mandatory in the United States
For
- My opponent has forfeited again.
- My opponent forfeits.
Against
- Compulsory voting basically mean everyone is required to vote. If you read the first sentence I wrote, you would clearly see that compulsory voting violates (force) the rights of people, period. Those who say "yes" what will happen if someone doesn't vote; jail time, fine, or…
- 1933.
Argentina benefits more from a US alliance than a Brazilian one
For
- I must forfeit this round. Joepbr may extend the BOP waiting time at my consent.
- Welcome Friends of DDO! I'll be challenging political science student, Joepbr, all the way from Brazil. The topic we will be arguing, is that Argentina's MNNA alliance with the US, is more beneficial then a hypothetical alliance with Brazil. My opponent will argue that…
Against
- Unfortunately, Jifpop's account is still closed, so I ask the voters to ignore this debate.
- I was going to extend the BoP waiting time as requested by my opponent, but unfortunately, he was banned, and therefore probably won't be coming back in the last round. This is a shame, not only because this debate will be wasted, but especially because Jifpop09 seemed to be…
- 1934.
Members should be able to see how colleagues voted
For
- Thank you for your support (in come things). It's natural to be nervous on your first debate. It's not natural to do so well as you did though. But most of all you made your argument clear TO ME, instead of trying to destroy my argument and my character like most do. (check out…
- Based on a debate I had before on patriotism where stevster (my contender) had some disturbing mindless arguments, I believe debate.org should allow us to see who voted for who. One of those reasons is that I am currently losing 2-4 and I'm curious to know what 4 idiots voted…
Against
- Hello, sorry I couldn't respond earlier, I was busier today. You said in your rebuttal that, "Personally, I wouldn't harass these people that voted for stevster but to a certain extent I WOULD demean them." (1) Fair enough. Even if we assumed that you would only demean them…
- Hello Blond_guy. I am not too good at debating, but I would love to take up your offer to debate this topic. I'm a bit nervous about the entire thing, but I'll give it a try. It is true that in this site, debate.org, that some people have a tendency to vote for whatever side…
- 1935.
Anarchism has fundamental flaws as a political system
For
- renuttal #1, nomun khishjargle told me that i shouldnt be meanm to people so i cant debate u sir LOL im smarter than u im taking honors algebra 1 and ur taking regular algebra LOL ur stupid go to stupid store
- i really like incest my sister is so hot id rape her
Against
- Well, actually, if you care to look at schoology (which I bet you haven't) on my schoology page, it CLEARLY states that I am in HONORS PRECALCULUS AND TRIGONOMETY WITH MR LAPILLE idiot! so, namiu chishigjarkal is an IFDIOTft!!! she is a fat urbasn fweahale and she fateres idiot…
- Actually, according to law 46 of aerodynamical equivalence, your sister has been proven to be not hot, thereby invalidating any claims you have of your sister being hot. (Newton 46) To quote, "Dom sister not hot and is factual". (Newfart 46) Therefore, any attraction you might…
- 1936.
Global anarchy is unsustainable
For
- I concede, you are superior. I am sorry to have wasted your time. I'd also like to tell you that I read your debate on the chicken coming before the egg and it is absolutely amazing!
- I would like to start off by complementing you, Spiral, you are such an amazing debater; I am quite impressed. The bar has been raised for me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I myself would like to give the definition of Anarchy,…
Against
- It was definately a great topic, I had fun. Thanks for your time :) Maybe consider rewording your premise and running again, there is much breadth within the idealism of anarchism, much like socialism. As a concept, positive anarchism is really just a theory, there are no real…
- "I myself would like to give the definition..." Definition 2 is a negative form of anarchism. Under such a system, it is most probably self fuelling and self sustainable, thus neatly meeting the requirements for your first definition and supporting my own position (anarchism is…
- 1937.
Political party manifestos should be legally binding
For
- My opponent's main objection seems to be that I didn't go into enough detail, so in this round I will expand on what I've already said. KroneckerDelta will then get the last word if he has any new objections. This argument is in the context of a parliamentary system, although…
- My proposed system for ensuring politicians keep their promises is as follows. Party manifestos would be written not as loose promises, but instead as legal documents. Parties would agree to carry out certain actions by a set date, if elected. For example, the UK Independence…
Against
- Con does not believe that Pro properly framed the resolution such that it should only be applied to a parliamentary system as opposed to, for instance, a presidential system like the United States. Even if this is only applied to parliamentary systems, Con feels that Pro has…
- In round 1, Con asked for three specific things: Clear explanation of enforcement mechanism. Arguments for why said enforcement mechanism would be effective. Arguments for why this would be beneficial to a democracy. Con believes that Pro has not sufficiently explained their…
- 1938.
Serving in the military does more harm than good
For
- I thank Con for his argument. Here I will provide my defence and conclude.DEFENSEC1: Risk of Injury My opponent says that only 6,000 people have died in the war on terror in 9 years. I'd like to point out that the war of terror is one of many conflicts that the United States…
- I will use this round for rebuttals as agreed in the initial round. C1: Economic benefitsA. Up-front money does not justify long hoursMy opponent says that the median salary is around $50,000 and tax exempt. However, military members are considered to be on duty at all times…
Against
- I thank F-16 for this fun and informative debate. I really want to talk about some of his round 4 points, but as per format, I'll only defend my case from his round 3 argument.C1: Economic advantageA: Up-front moneyPro's claims military crew work "long hours". Since he hasn't…
- Thanks to F-16 for continuing this very informative debate. I hope my opponent has learned just as much as I have form this round.As per format, I will only refute my opponent's case in this round.C1: Risk of injuryDespite stereotypes, the military is relatively risk-free. Pro…
- 1939.
Progressives have a significant history of intolerance
For
- R1: The Progressive Founding FathersI use the term founding fathers in a way to signify they were the most prominent leaders of the Progressives.Teddy Roosevelt Teddy Roosevelt indeed did endorse the book (1). My opponent ask me to give more examples of the intolerance of Teddy…
- Let me start with thank you to magicr for accepting this debateC1: The Progressive Founding FathersAs we all know the progressive founding fathers are Teddy Roosevelt and later Woodrow Wilson. These people practically shaped and created the progressive movement and these people…
Against
- Progressive Founding FathersThese men were leaders in the progressive movement, but they were not the only leaders of the progressive movement.TRPro claims that TR did endorse the book, yet his link does not work, so it cannot be concluded that he did so from the evidence…
- To begin, we must determine what makes someone a progressive. It should be noted that just because someone was a politician during the progressive era (1990s-1920s [1]) does not make them a progressive. A progressive can be determined by looking at a person's beliefs and…
- 1940.
The United States should not attack Iran
For
- This is a 5 round debate. only serious candidates willing to go all the way should accept. thanks. Debate breakdown: 1. Acceptance; brief intro 2. Pro' s opening arguments/ Con's rebuttal 3. Pro's rebuttal/ Con's 2nd rebuttal. 4. Pro's 2nd rebuttal /con's 3rd rebuttal. 5.…
- Conclusion: A recent Poll as of Mar 14, 2012 clearly states that 41 percent of the population supports a U.S. attack on Iran while 53 percent is opposed to such an attack. voice from the regionHezbollah Deputy Chief Sheikh Naim Qassem has stated that if Israel were to attack…
Against
- I accept.
- ~~Correction heres my Final Conclusion~~ My points still stand. Iran has promised to blow us and Israel of the map. This should not be treated lightly since we have clearly seen in the past hat denying a threat could lead to horrible evens such as the attack on Pearl Harbor and…
- 1941.
Government should have no role in marriage
For
- I agree with the general definition that you provided as it would make discussing the concept much simpler. - From many of the arguements that con has provided, it can be concluded that the main benefits of recognizing a marriage by government, would be to protect a child's…
- Sorry about the long response, my internet provider screwed me up.I thank my opponent for his response.- "Marriage=The state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law...`` Marriage is…
Against
- I'm very sorry for the delay, a bunch of things keep getting thrown my way ie:debate team, english project, work, catching up to skip pre-calculus and go straight to calculus and etc. I'm truly sorry for the wait, but here's my rebuttal :). -"The benefits point" Nonetheless the…
- Anyways, let me begin. First, I must agree, the definition i provided was a very limiting one, yet it was meant to serve as a basis. Observing the various spans of the definition can provide a better definition. Marriage=The state of being united to a person/people of the…
- 1942.
Military intervention to stop atrocities can be legal without UN approval
For
- Disarming illegal weapons
- Current International law on the use of force no longer matters
Against
- There is no point in defending some norms at the costs of breaching others
- Military action is only legal with UN Security Council approval
- 1943.
The Dalai Lama should be allowed to return to Tibet
For
- ok, there is no point in arguing aganst you because you obviously are to stupid to understand my aguments and its hard to argue agaist someone who does not speak english so every one or anyone who is following this debate know this: i am not giving up, but i dont see the point…
- Ok, I give you the fact that China may have control over Tibet, but i doubt that the Dalai Lama will "undermine the government" this is just stupid. I am buddhist myself, so i know that the Dalai Lama will do anything that the Chienese Government will not like except not be…
Against
- I understand my opponent's arguments perfectly well, and I refuted them all along with providing my own arguments against the resolution. I also think it's rather clear that I speak English fluently. I didn't avoid anything my opponent said. By not responding at all to what I…
- "Ok, I give you the fact that China may have control over Tibet, but i doubt that the Dalai Lama will "undermine the government" this is just stupid. I am buddhist myself, so i know that the Dalai Lama will do anything that the Chienese Government will not like except not be…
- 1944.
Drones should be used for military assault missions
For
- I'll make fun of you No sources necessary, however you may bring up a source to prove the oppositions point incorrect All other conflicts will be cleared up in the comment section.
Against
- 7 points to con please!
- We can do a 1-rounder I guess if MattHarrison comes back.
- 1945.
Civil disobedience in the modern United States is morally justified
For
- Truthfully, I've just spent the past thirteen hours at work and I'll be back at work bright and early for another grueling twelve hours. I apologize to my opponent and to anyone who may have been following the debate, but I will not be submitting my closing arguments.
- Rebuttal 1 - Stifling Debate A) I do not consider my opponent's accusation of hearsay to be a personal attack, but rather a mischaracterization given that I am making informed arguments "based on sound reasoning or information and/or having information especially as a result of…
Against
- I spent a great deal of time this last weekend thinking about this debate, and how to respond. Here it goes. Pro concludes "Conclusion: A mischaracterization that is stifling our debate over Civil Disobedience and hypocritical given that you don't abide by the same standard…
- Rebuttal 1: "Informed?" In round two, I mentioned that much of my opponents statements were "hearsay" being defined as "unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one"s direct knowledge." My opponent seems to have taken this statement as…
- 1946.
Teachers should be allowed to carry firearms at school
For
- I believe that teachers should have the right to bear arms.If you need clarification please comment.1st round is acceptanceNext 3 rounds will determine the winnerLet's make this debate fun and serious!Cheers! :)
- "When was the last time you heard on the news of a school shooting with a taser? Exactly, it's irrelevant."Tasers are not heard of in the news because they aren't allowed yet. That is what I am debating. I gave a logical scenario in my previous argument: "[...] Imagine the…
Against
- ""When was the last time you heard on the news of a school shooting with a taser? Exactly, it's irrelevant." Tasers are not heard of in the news because they aren't allowed yet. That is what I am debating. I gave a logical scenario in my previous argument:" Guns aren't allowed…
- "I'm not proposing that we arm teachers all the time. I'm simply saying that teachers should have access to some sort of weapon for self defence and the defence of students. I said this in the beginning: " The right to bear arms implies that you actually bear the arms. Assuming…
- 1947.
Healthcare reform should be banned
For
- Definitions: Healthcare reform: Affordable Healthcare Act, also known as ObamaCare Banned: in this sense I assume repealing. //abbreviations\ OC: ObamaCare HC: healthcare --Rebuttals-- My opponents main claim is OC helps the uninsured. Although this is true, one must ask of it…
- I win
Against
- The affordable healthcare act should not be banned due to the healthcare it will provide for the uninsured. Tax payers are contributing already to those on poverty insurance carriers & this will only lead to creating a more preventative healthcare future.
- 1948.
Nuclear weapons should be abolished worldwide
For
- A world without nuclear weapons would be nice, but sadly the whole world will never get rid of nuclear weapons because we all have different views.
- I am aganst nuclear warfare. but if the U.S gets rid of the weapons countries like north korea will see this as a weakness and attack.
Against
- I think we came to an agreement that nuclear weapons are not necessary and a world without them would be much brighter. Sadly as you have said it's unlikely that we'll ever get rid of them, but that should not stop us from trying.Thank you for the debate and thanks to everyone…
- Thanks for replying again.The point I'm making is that if we wouldn't have nuclear weapons at all and I mean not U.S. only, I mean globally, there wouldn't be a threat of getting bombed.Let's try to take a look from the other perspective : U.S. has unfriendly policies against…
- 1949.
Proportional representation should replace plurality voting systems
For
- I think my opponent's response comes down to a simple statement: "Well what would be the alternative? "In regards to this, I wish to state the alternative: STV. In STV, constituencies become multi-seat constituencies. If I create a scenario:Conservative votes: 30,000Lib Dem :…
- I shall address my opponent's rebuttals whilst reinforcing my own arguments:My opponent gives an example of how PR can only be applied to a Congressional or Parliamentary system, and not a Presidential election. This could have been a very good, strong argument, if it weren't…
Against
- "I think my opponent's response comes down to a simple statement: "Well what would be the alternative? ""Damn, I must have messed something up I was aiming for "Plurality systems equate to one man=one vote""In Plurality systems, the conservatives would get 1 seat, and therefore…
- Geography in Politics"However, the real problem is that they (The Liberal Dems) come second in a lot of constituencies"Ok but it shows that Geography is still the issue because almost throughout the country there are more people supporting another party then them. "This means…
- 1950.
The United States should build a full border fence with Mexico
For
- The US-Mexican border fence is a practical way to help stop illegal immigration and the problems it causes. The border fence has:- Reduced illegal immigration rates - Helped defend the economy of the United States- Reduced the influx of drugs and crime across the border-…
- To counter my opponents' points:a) "Although in several cases it would be easy enough to just move species out of the area, the fence still gets in the way of migration routes that have been in use for hundreds and hundreds of years. Moving the animals would only further…
Against
- To counter my opponent's arguments1) "While environmental concerns are certainly serious and warrant consideration, we need to balance competing interests here. Only a handful of species that would be threatened by this project, and the endangered species in question can be…
- To challenge my opponents points:1) "Here's an example: In the early 1990s, the amount of people crossing the border in the San Diego region illegally every year was estimated at 600,000. After the construction of a fence and increased border patrols, that number dropped to…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?