Discussly

Politics Debate Topics — page 21

3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 21 of 73
  1. 1001.

    A total war between Judeo-Christian and Islamic civilizations will occur this century

    For

    • I will first address my opponent's statement that, because of the U.S.' system of checks and balances, a dictatorial form of government cannot occur. The Roman Republic also had a complex constitution with checks and balances, but when things started going wrong, they gave…
    • Thank you, Skeptic for accepting my open debate. I do not wish to pull my opponent into a semantics trap. I'm sorry for not explicitly saying that religion will cause WW3. I am predicting that it will. My opponent claims that because this is the twenty first century horrendous…

    Against

    • I applaud my opponent for his somewhat original argument, but I'm sorry to say that the mass majority of what he has said are either red herrings, false analogies, or over-exaggerations. I will first plow through his new points, then recap on the other points/issues/argument he…
    • My opponent has seemingly ignored or "done away" with several of my key points. As such, I will first go through his counterarguments, then highlight argument he has failed to respond to. [quote]My opponent claims that because this is the twenty first century horrendous things…
  2. 1002.

    Barack Obama is a good president

    For

    • I can give you more reasons why he is good than you can tell me why he is bad
    • I can give you more reasons why he is good thaN YOU CAN SAY WHY HE IS BAD

    Against

    • Yolo
    • Obama is bad because I said so.
  3. 1003.

    Terrorism often achieves its political goals

    For

    • Good luck. You have disagreed with my definition of goals, and then suggested that we debate with goals meaning 'a desired outcome'. I'd just like to point out that my def. did not dispute this at all, just elaborated upon the words goals. My opponent is stating an obvious, I…
    • Before any argument is put forward, a definition is a necessity in this debate. The word 'goals' is certainly a word that needs explaining. Terrorists, or freedom fighter's goals are not to incite terror, or fear, as many would suggest. In fact, terror is just used as a weapon…

    Against

    • To reiterate my argument in this final round... Pro has attempted to align the definitions of goal and terrorism in such a way that they are not neutral. While attempting to romanticize the tactic of terrorism, he has failed to acknowledge the short comings and failures of the…
    • I am glad that you have chosen to accept the definition of goal as I provided. While your definition did not dispute that a goal is a desired outcome, such a phrase was absent from your definition which rather than defining goal attempted to define the goals of terrorism, or…
  4. 1004.

    Legal immigration is now harming Americans

    For

    • Lets try to stick to the topic. The debate is about a very specific topic, I am only talking about the American middle class, not the rich and not the poor. I am not saying completely stop legal immigration. I'm saying that make it smarter and not allow anyone & everyone to…
    • This debate is not about who can work harder, immigrants or Americans. It is irrelevant. A citizen should always have more opportunities than non-citizens otherwise there is no concept of country. Unlike other countries, most people want to come to America and that makes it…

    Against

    • While you're focusing on the American middle class, you seem to be forgetting that the poor, the middle class and the rich are affected by such actions. Decreasing or eliminating legal immigration will inevitably create more incentive to come to the country illegally, which…
    • In all honesty, this is my first debate on this website so I'm still getting used to the details and how it works. On your point about legal immigrants bringing in more people by chain migration. With any form of migration or immigration this is inevitable. However another…
  5. 1005.

    Israel is not as evil as commonly portrayed

    For

    • I think we have had a misunderstand standing i am pro Israel. I don't want to argue that it was 100% Palestine's fault. I want to argue that Its more Palestinian's fault. You see i agree with what u said and what you said is my opinion as well. Maybe i did not make it clear…
    • Before we start i would like to make it very clear that Israel is not completely in the right because it does sometimes overreact. I am arguing that Israel has not committed a "genocide" on the Palestinian people or that Israel has stole Palestinian land and if you weigh out…

    Against

    • ff Please don't vote - Shabbat Shalom.
    • fair enough, what I said is still contradictory to yours though
  6. 1006.

    The US government should legalize all drugs

    For

    • Our experience is the source of all knowledge.Con's analogies to sex with a minor and cutting aren't relevant or persuasive. Sex with a minor violates the harm principle. Cutting doesn't. Sex with a minor is illegal. Cutting isn't. If anything, we shoud treat drugs like…
    • Con drops my entire case. Extend my argument that drugs are awesome, the harm principle, and my cost/benefit analysis of legalization vs prohibition. Con's argument focuses exclusively on whether drug use is harmful. But the issue in this debate isn't whether drug use is…

    Against

    • What we have learned: An Overview of this debate "Our experience is the source of all knowledge." The above is a quote from pro. The question becomes, what is our experience with legalizing drugs. I demonstrated last round that our experience legalizing harmful substances has…
    • Pro says "Con drops my entire case. Extend my argument that drugs are awesome, the harm principle, and my cost/benefit analysis of legalization vs prohibition." To be clear, I did not drop these arguments, I just followed a typical debate structure only presenting my case in…
  7. 1007.

    Foreign powers should not intervene in Syria's civil war

    For

    • Welcome to this debate between the esteemed YYW and myself, ConservativePolitico.First round is for acceptance only. Four rounds.1 week to vote.8k character limit. Foreign powers will include any sovereign group or nation outside of Syria's border.Intervene will mean any action…
    • Welcome, welcome to my last round of this wonderful debate where I am going to focus on concluding and closing out in a strong fashion. In Ultimate Conclusion...I want to reaffirm that no group has the capacity to judge another state as to whether or not they are adequately…

    Against

    • I'll just use CP's sources again... so yeah. 1. National Sovereignty The mere occurrence of human rights violations in any degree is alone not sufficient to justify actions which, if taken by another state, would be at the expense of another state's sovereignty -but when human…
    • I will rebut this round, and offer my own case in the following round. Is this unconventional? Yes. But why, you may ask, is YYW being unconventional? Because I'm tired and forgot about this until now. I am obviously a terrible person. Without further ado, it's debating time.…
  8. 1008.

    Private corporations should stay neutral on gay rights

    For

    • I like to clarify that all the arguments, I presented, were based on the priorities of the current major problems of society where corporation should spend valuable time and money. This is self explanatory that corporations should be neutral on the gay right, consider it to be…
    • I thank the con to give me the opportunity for participating in the debate and share my views. As I have selected to speak as pro in this debate, following are the views on it: Observation 1: Gay rights might come under the human right but definitely should be least prioritise…

    Against

    • Observation 1: My opponent's concept for human rights is not more practical nor broad because as I've explained, his functioning with human rights is not how human rights functions. Human rights are supposed to be protect across any spectrum. What my opponent is doing is…
    • Extend all arguments across the flow.
  9. 1009.

    Affirmative action policies are justified in the United States

    For

    • Because that we are now on the final rounds I will put up one rule following upon the next round 1)No more new present arguments/evidence->unless your opponents asked for one For now let me reconstruct my opponents refutation towards my argument They have refuted my claim that…
    • I am very honoured to be debating against such an experienced debater! Because I am a beginner, I am very sorry for the lack of knowledge here. However, I would like to start off by also setting an example to our viewers from my previous arguments. Imagine a balance. One…

    Against

    • Just as a reminder; my opponent has the burden of proof to show that the benefits of affirmative action outweigh the harms. If they fail to do so, the win must automatically go to me. My opponent shows that, even though we have a black president, racism and discrimination are…
    • My opponent asked for some clarification regarding my arguments, so I will provide some here.What my first argument basically boils down to is that, in affirmative action, we are not hiring people based on merit or their qualifications; instead we are hiring them simply because…
  10. 1010.

    Iran should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons

    For

    • I would not dare say that the Iranian government is not full of holocaust deniers and irrational leaders. I also would not deny that in probable likelihood, they are denying UN inspectors as they are pursuing certain nuclear activities. But I claim that they have just the same…
    • Thanks for the quick response!Con States: "You've got the United States, China, and other world superpowers with TONS of nuclear weapons. Therefore it is hypocritical for every other country to not let Iran produce nuclear weapons." I argue that very point and in favor of any…

    Against

    • Before I finish up my debate and summary, I just wanted to say it was nice debating with somebody who actually knows what they're talking about. I've debated others, who have come up with the most ridiculous evidence. And I'm glad that you cite your sources and such. I…
    • No problem! Yes, In my previous argument I stated that it is hypocritical for every other country to not let Iran produce nuclear weapons. But I also stated why I believe that they should NOT in the following sentence. My Point:Sure, any nation is capable of using nuclear arms…
  11. 1011.

    The NSA's current surveillance powers are justified

    For

    • As con has refused to post any arguments' i refuse to debate. If the Con wishes to debate this later, he may message me.
    • I pass my opportunity to debate, and shall allow con to post his arguments.

    Against

    • NSA is defined as the National Security Agency of the United States Justified is defined as shown to be right or reasonable. The National Security Agency is headed by Admiral Michael Rogers, and is tasked with global monitoring, collection, and processing of information and…
  12. 1012.

    The United States would win a war against Russia

    For

    • We would absolutely beat them just to be sure my opponent understands we arent talking about a nuclear war usa is just a far superior military
    • Russia's economy is crumbling and has been declining for awhile Russian equipment is outdated Russia int a super power but a regional power Putin is trying to push it back into the Soviet era but cant afford with such a crashing economy I get a feeling the war would be along…

    Against

    • Sadly, the military is not the only factor in a war. A few examples of this would be the current war against terrorism waged by the U.S and their allies, Vietnam or Afghanistan. If we take a look at the recent big wars the United States took a part in, we can clearly see that…
    • Thank you for proposing this debate. Just in order to be clear; I am defending the fact that in a (non-nuclear, as stated above) war, the United States would not be able to "beat" Russia, and not the fact that Russia would beat the United States. Good luck and have fun :)
  13. 1013.

    The US should substantially expand social services for the poor

    For

    • i thought we were having a decent debate till you went and done that and said " i win " . let me tell you what i mean when i say the goverment couldnt care about you unless you are rich . of course the goverment " care " thats why they introuduce these systems for crying out…
    • I would like to point out again my opened is right in what he says that the government do have a moral obligation to protect the people etc etc . I would also like to point a harsh truth about America and several other first world countries , this may come as no surprise but…

    Against

    • My opponent stated that America and other first-world countries don't care about what happens to their citizens. However, if they didn't care why have so many of the [England, France and Canada] implemented systems of universal health care? In addition, why does the US have a…
    • I was actually hoping for a policy debate with stocks issues and the rest... Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase social services for persons living in poverty in the United States My opponent stated, "the united states government simply…
  14. 1014.

    George W. Bush was a better president than Barack Obama

    For

    • Experience is valuable. If you were to take two people, know nothing about them aside from their experience, and choose one to fill a position, you would choose the most experienced. The president is an administrator who must not allow the country to fall apart under his watch.…
    • I maintain that the previous president of the United States was a better president than our current president, a claim for which I alone have the burden of proof. My reasoning for this is simple. Subjective arguments can be repeated ad nauseum but prove nothing. Our country is…

    Against

    • APPROVAL RATINGS My opponent said, "Under [Lincoln's] presidency half the states seceded and his subjects hated him enough to assassinate him. " This is my point exactly. At the time, his "approval ratings" were terrible. But now we recognize that the actions he took to cause…
    • "The only possible way to objectively know which president was better is to base our opinion on the amount of their experience." Here my opponent essentially defines "better" to be exclusively based on seniority. This is a ludicrous standard of measurement because it does not…
  15. 1015.

    Barack Obama's policies promoted socialism

    For

    • All I can tell you is how i feel at this point, I have no factual evidence to back it up You clearly address that point about people using their ideological view on how things should work when trying to make policies, and I guess that's the way I think. Ill claim ignorance, I'm…
    • First i would like to say that I have never done this before, sorry if I'm not up to par. The main topic to be focused on is the taxation of the rich ($250,00 and higher) that Senator Obama has proposed. The "spreading of the wealth" idea he proposed to Joe the plumber is not…

    Against

    • Well. I hadn't heard that Senator Biden said that, but it seems like, in the best case scenaro a gaffe, or in the worst case scenario, the Obama people have lowered the ceiling from $250,000 to $150,000. I guess the only claim I can make is that we haven't seen anything saying…
    • No, you're doing fine. It's just that generally when someone makes a claim, they express the way they got to that conclusion. In any case, you make a reasonable point bringing up Senator Obama's spread the wealth comment and I can't refute that on it's face but we can fall back…
  16. 1016.

    US border control should shoot on sight

    For

    • It is a reliable solution because it will indeed send the message that they are not welcome here. They come here stealing jobs and bringing diseases like cockroaches. Tell me what do you do when cockroaches infest your house? You exterminate them. Once 10 or 20 of them go down…
    • For too long the illegal immigrants have been crossing the border. If we had started it before the issue most likely would have been dropped by now.

    Against

    • Extend all contentions to the next round.
    • I'm not sure if my opponent is serious. He is advocating that we murder people for trying to have a better life. That is their only crime. Let's look at some of his points. " They come here stealing jobs and bringing diseases like cockroaches." If your concern is really the…
  17. 1017.

    Democrats deliberately harmed people during the shutdown to blame Republicans

    For

    • I see in my opponent's response he seems to concede that the democrats will not negotiate on the only pertinent issue, the ACA.
    • The Republicans have offered at least two bills to fully fund the government without repealing, defunding, or delaying the ACA: 1. To fund the government but remove special subsidies for members of congress; and 2. To fund the government but repeal the medical device tax. The…

    Against

    • Pro states that multiple offers have been made by republicans to end the shutdown. 1. To fund the government but remove special subsidies for members of congress I would love for Pro to cite this information because if every republican was on board with this I would be shocked.…
    • How is it that only the democrats are unwilling to compromise? Better yet why should they have to? The republicans introduced this bill with the defunding of ACA as a part of it. Of course this would cause conflict in congress with no possibility of the democrats conceding.…
  18. 1018.

    Governments should ban private gun ownership

    For

    • I personally believe everybody who wants to have a gun and is law abiding and legal should be able to obtain one, all I want is for the background checks to be more secure, I don't think we should ban any guns or weapons, I just want slightly strong background checks just to…
    • All I am saying is that by making background checks more secure, it allows mentally sane and law abiding citizens to be able to purchase weapons, and we can also filter out the criminals from attempting to purchase guns for acts of crime. when you have things like the Black…

    Against

    • I'm sorry, your arguments are a bit confusing to me. Are you for or against the banning of guns? But anyway, if you make guns banned, normal citizens will not be able to purchase them. Criminals, like you stated, will obtain guns from sources such as the black market. Citizens…
    • Your argument is completely true. You stated that enforcing gun control would make it harder for normal citizens to buy a gun. But wouldn't banning guns make it impossible? Yes, criminals would still Illegally obtain guns. But with better gun control, wouldn't it make it harder…
  19. 1019.

    Liberalism and white guilt threaten to destroy society

    For

    • It does have a effect: see: www.biu.ac.il/soc/ec/wp/2009-12.pdf Also, without white guilt, politican support for foreign aid would be minimal, and politicians wasting money in such adventures would be removed quickly from office
    • No it is not a troll debate It is more like making some points across about the fact that white guilt ends up making damage to both european and african nations, by making the african population baloon, which leads to social conflict and immigration to Europe, where even MORE…

    Against

    • Without evidence your arguments don't hold any ground. 1. It has not been proven that white guilt alone causes aid to be sent to foreign nations. Moreover, it is unproven that this causes population booms, and finally it is unproven that this leads to any of the impacts you…
    • As I am negating this resolution, the burden of proof falls to the pro side to prove that Liberalism and White Guilt will actually destroy the world. I will now respond to my opponents arguments. My opponent has offered no evidence of any kind in support of his wild, ignorant…
  20. 1020.

    Donald Trump is not racist

    For

    • Hello, and good luck to my opponent. Donald Trump is not racist. He has never spoken out against any race. His border wall and immigration standards only apply to illegal immigrants. Islam is not a race. Good luck to my opponent.
    • The ban does not have a set time and the ban does not revolve around a time: It will be set up until the screening process can be improved. The ban could last a week or a year. This is not a ban on muslims, this is a ban on muslim immigration while the screening process can be…

    Against

    • I accept and look forward to a good debate with Pro.On December 7, 2015, Donald Trump called for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".[1] That is clearly discrimination against Muslims. Note that his proposal does not just apply to illegal…
    • A non-discriminatory policy would be a ban on immigration of people considered high-risk. But that's not what Trump proposed on December 7th, last year. As Pro stated, Donald's policy was "a ban on Muslim immigration", all Muslim immigration. This policy is discriminatory, and…
  21. 1021.

    The Obama administration's IRS scandal alone justifies impeachment

    For

    • I wish to thank you for your consideration in debating me on this topic. This is the format for the debate:Round 1: Acceptance only.Round 2: Arguments only.Round 3: Rebuttals only.Round 4: Closing Arguments and Rebuttals.————————Good luck,~Corridon. Note: This debate is on both…
    • The reason why the Watergate scandal had such a resonance with history was because nobody thought that their President would be so desperate to win an election that he would bug phones, conversation rooms, and steal documents at Democrat headquarters in Watergate Hotel. It was…

    Against

    • I accept and will argue that the scandals in question only exemplify the inefficiency of government rather then somehow justify the impeachment of Obama
    • Arrrg
  22. 1022.

    War is necessary to end conflicts

    For

    • Since Con Forfeited, All contentions still stand.
    • You still have yet to refute the primary contention that the fear of war keeps peace. Also you are resorting to moralistic fallacies to support the resolution that wars are unnecessary to end conflicts.Moralistic fallacy-A formal fallacy of assuming that what is desirable is…

    Against

    • Humans are rational enough to not go to war. Problems and disagreements can be resolved through political debate and discussion, rather than guns and bombs. Of course wars exist, but war is not a natural state of affairs, and with increased global communication and discussion…
    • Humans are rational Humans are rational enough to not go to war. Problems and disagreements can be resolved through political debate and discussion, rather than guns and bombs. Of course wars exist, but war is not a natural state of affairs, and with increased global…
  23. 1023.

    The United States should end its war on drugs

    For

    • This debate is for all drugs, also you broke a rule, the acceptance rule. My case first: C1: cost of the drug war After 40 years 1 trillion dollars have been spent on the drug war. (1) In 2010 the goverment spent 550$ per second. (2) 2011 it is over 1000$ every second. (3) 48.7…
    • Bop is even in this debate (not much of one at all but still)

    Against

    • I'd like to start out by saying thank you for allowing me to debate this topic with you. It's my first one on here, so I'm going to start off with a bang. You say legalize drugs, but you don't give any specifics. First of all, legalize ALL drugs, or just specific ones? There…
  24. 1024.

    The words 'under God' should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance

    For

    • I apologize. I haven't had the time lately and greatly underestimated my recent workload. I concede to Con.
    • Thank you Sojourner for joining this debate. To begin, I'd like to talk about the history of the Pledge. The Pledge was written by a socialist Baptist minister who was essentially fired for describing Jesus as a socialist. He was a writer for a magazine that sold American…

    Against

    • Since I have some space to fill, I just want to say that I really enjoy DDO. I frequent this site at lunch every day and I really enjoy many of the debaters. I find that this site provides a unique opportunity to more fully understand the positions of those I do not necessarily…
    • I understand. Thanks for the debate.
  25. 1025.

    The Tea Party movement is extremist

    For

    • The Tea Party has instigated claims against President Barack Obama on social and economic issues that aren't based in reality. They also are opposed by most Americans.

    Against

    • No comment.
    • Everywhere that freedom stirs, let tyrants fear. - George W. Bush
  26. 1026.

    The Obama administration covered up the Benghazi attack

    For

    • Ok Not hard to find evidence and for the people in the comments saying the the GOP are using it as a talking point. They're not! And you wanted proof? Explain the emails found! Explain why even though Obama Knew about it being a terrorist attack but he blamed it on the youtube…
    • I Say they did as they still are! People are saying oh investigate 9/11! AND WE DID Now i'm saying to investigate Benghazi!, but that's never going to happen as Obama will get impeached and Hillary Clinton's chance of running for pres will die.

    Against

    • As is expected, Pro is making a positive statement and therefore has the burden of proof to demonstrate to us conclusively that the Obama Administration "covered up Benghazi. " He must provide us with some hard evidence.
    • My opponent has forfeited without fulfilling her BOP.
  27. 1027.

    Politicians should not justify policy positions using religious texts

    For

    • Yeah lol
    • Ah damn it I meant to say shouldn't! Lets just delete this debate

    Against

    • Yeah, I assumed that you are arguing for "shouldn't." So I argued for "should." Regardless, good debate.....
    • You clearly said that you were against the issue? "I believe that the bible or any holy book for that matter should be used to justify a stance on an issue" You clearly stated above that you think holy books should be used and then you said you were against it. Technically, you…
  28. 1028.

    The welfare state should be abolished

    For

    • I argue that the Welfare State should be abolished.There are different definitions of the Welfare State. However, I am just going to be broad about it and define the welfare state as anything the state does beyond the Night Watchman State. The Night Watchman State is defined…
    • First, let me point out, that this is NOTa sources debate. So, whoever has the most or best sources does not get 2 points automatically.Okay, so let me make my points.Argument Against Welfare StateFirst, I am going to make a quick case against the welfare state in general,…

    Against

    • I will be presenting arguments i favor of the "welfare states" as defined by my opponent. My first and only argument in favor of the "welfare state" is that it increases societies standard of living and its economy. I will now present examples and evidence of the welfare states…
    • Pro forfeited
  29. 1029.

    Europe has a moral duty to accept Syrian and Iraqi refugees

    For

    • Round 3: I will summarize each contention raised using bullet-points and then I will follow with an analysis of the arguments, detailing why the arguments are flawed and misinformed. C1 Summary:* Europe is suffering from economic crises.1. Specifically, Greece has been on the…
    • In life, we are guided by our morality because it is a means to an end. That end is a lasting livelihood that is secure, free, exhilarating, and shared. We wish for such an end because our nature demands it. We want to be free. We want to have choice. We want to have goods and…

    Against

    • The Case For - The "Golden" Rule and the Economics behind itWhen it came down to morality, I expected such a thought-provoking argument of the humanitarian argument to come up, but imagine the disappointment instead this comes up, and finding out how poorly this has tried to…
    • And without further ado, I shall begin. Contention 1 - It is worsening Europe's economic situationThe situation faced by Europe is a troubling one, and one of the worst cases comes with it's economic detriments. We are dealing with the biggest wave of refugees since the Second…
  30. 1030.

    Israel's current military actions in Gaza are justified

    For

    • Dear Con, I don't mean to be rude, but your argument strongly seems to imply that you didn't read mine whatsoever. In fact, my previous argument rebukes most points you have made, as I strongly expected what you would have to say. However, I will still attempt to create a…
    • Just to confirm, I will be arguing that Israel is 'right' in its current conflict against Gaza and that its current actions are justifiable. First of all, let's lay down the facts. On June 12, three Israeli teens were kidnapped and later found dead in the West Bank, a fellow…

    Against

    • Ok, so to summarize, my opponent's whole argument boils down to, "Israel has the high ground because they're just defending themselves from Gaza's aggression." Fair enough. Gaza is always the initiator between the two sides, and Israel is just defending themselves. I did indeed…
    • Good argument on the side of the Aff, but now i will rebuke him and prove why Gaza is in the right in the current conflict. In order to explain this, I need to take a trip back in time. The conflict really started back in 1967, when Israelis invaded Palestine, and stayed there…
  31. 1031.

    Barack Obama was a bad president

    For

    • 1. President Obama is responsible for six trillion dollars of debt. 2. He has not helped the economy at all. 3. His presidency has been consumed with scandals such as Fast and Furious, Benghazi, and the IRS targeting groups. 4. He has been unwilling to work with Congress. 5.…
    • I hope my opponent can come up with an actual argument.

    Against

    • I decided to support Barack Obama pretty early in the Democratic primary, around spring of 2007. But unlike so many of his supporters, I never experienced a kind of emotional response to his candidacy. I never felt his election would change everything about American politics or…
    • Me too
  32. 1032.

    Affirmative action discriminates against racial minorities

    For

    • "For"? You mean that it's to minorities' benefit? I'll buy that. But I think it's racist against minorities as well as whites - not only "reverse racism" (I don't care for that term) but traditional racism too (though I don't think whether racism is "reverse" depends at all on…
    • It tells them that they need help, that they are nothing but their races, and that the country feels sorry for them. At least that's how I see it. I recognize that it does have benefits, but this is about whether it's racist. I'll be honest: I just want to reach my three…

    Against

    • Yes it's racist against majorities but racist for minorities.
    • Affirmative action is not racist against minorities, it is racist FOR minorities.
  33. 1033.

    Gun control laws should be strengthened

    For

    • America's obession with guns is too much. It needs to stop. Obivously, nobody learned anything from the Newtown shootings. You won't need to defend yourself if you there weren't guns in the first place.
    • Gun control is the way to go. Too many school shootings, too many deaths, why not just ban guns altogether for a safer America

    Against

    • None of us have forgotten the Newtown massacre (I hope). It was tragic indeed, and it proves the failure of background checks. What needs to be done to avoid future mass murders, is to have stronger background checks, and not banning guns,It isn't fair to those who are…
    • I extend.
  34. 1034.

    Obama did not fulfill his campaign promises well

    For

    • In response to several of my opponents points, particularly his opening, while "technically" a 60/40 majority is needed to break a filibuster, there is a way in the senate where a filibuster can be broken using only a 51/59 majority. This is called the "nuclear option" (.…
    • For this round, I shall address my opponent's points. First of all, regarding the politifact, these figure actually show that 153 have been broken, stalled, or compromised, while 141 have actually been kept. Another 212 are "in the works", which is still not the same as truly…

    Against

    • Thanks Mr. Anon. ==PolitiFacts== My opponent cannot count campaign promises that resulted in a compromise with Repubs as "broken" promises. The entire point of our political system, particularly the new supermajority rules in the Senate, are designed to force compromise.…
    • Thanks for the topic! PolitiFact tracks campaign promises and how many are kept: Obama has KEPT 141 promises, COMPROMISED on 41, BROKEN 42, 212 are IN THE WORKS, and 70 have STALLED. http://www.politifact.com... Due to my opponent severely limiting character space, I can't go…
  35. 1035.

    Barack Obama was a good president

    For

    • Con drops all of my arguments in his closing. Extend my points--Obama may not have been the best President, but he was a "quality" one. Thanks to Con for a nice discourse, and I urge a Pro ballot!
    • I'll rebut Con and then go on to defend my own case. CON's CASE Under Obama's administration, raw unemployment has dropped, as can be seen in my first contention. But, I also think that the economic situation would have been far better had the GOP been more cooperative. The…

    Against

    • In closing, I believe that we agree that Obama is not the best President we have ever had, and we have once again proved that no president can please everyone in his decision-making.
    • My opponent makes some very good points, but I would like to point out many flaws in his thinking. First: I would argue that his handling of the economy is almost a matter of opinion. From my point of view, he is doing anything but stemming the downward spiral of the economy,…
  36. 1036.

    The United States should substantially strengthen immigration regulation

    For

    • P1. The debate is whether The United States government should substantially strengthen regulation of immigration to the United States. The issue is immigration in relation to United States citizenship. We participated in a debate for 3 rounds defending our premises on whether…
    • P1: strengthening the regulation of immigration means strengthening the system which permits and regulates United States citizenship. Unauthorized practice is one aspect which I would like to introduce in terms of regulation. "Notario Fraud" is a serious issue to the regulation…

    Against

    • P1: The topic is The US gov. should substantially strengthen the regulation of immigration to the US. The issue is WHETHER OR NOT the US gov should strengthen the regulation of immigration to the US. The topic I see above doesn't say regulation of immigration in relation to US…
    • P1: The topic says regulation of immigrants TO the U.S, not IN the U.S. That does not mean regulation of United States citizenship. If that were the case, that would be the topic. P2: "notario fraud will prevent an individual who wishes to do so". If notario fraud prevents…
  37. 1037.

    Texas should add under God to its state pledge

    For

    • Well, it's been added. And since there isn't really anything you can do about it (unless you plan to boycott school), would just accepting it be an option for those people? The Texas Pledge is just like the Pledge of Alligiance in how you are pledging alligiance to your state…
    • Allow me to make something clear. When I said something about "you having a problem with it" I wasn't necissarily referring to YOU specifically. It was more of a generaliztion term. I didn't mean for it to sound so personal, I apologize. Now then, on to the argurment. We have…

    Against

    • But this also goes along with "prayer in school". People have the choice to say it, but then afterwards people are accused of not saying it and it starts a debate in class. It also goes along with religion in school. Teachers are considerably not supposed to teach about the…
    • I never said that I had a problem with it I said multiple students had a problem with it. Yes, our school could be taking it into consideration but WITHOUT taking the students beliefs into consideration. The "In God We Trust" on the back of our dollar has been there since…
  38. 1038.

    Governments invent foreign enemies to justify military expansion

    For

    • From Agamemnon taking advantage of the fact that Helen his brother's wife had been kidnapped by Paris the son of Priam, to wage war upon Troy to the Romans deeming themselves superior to other cultures to justify their outrageous imperialism, from the USA using the threat of…
    • I see you made no mention whatsoever of the Romans which I presume means you finally understood how great military power does not equate to actual greatness either that or you didn't read what I said about slavery, gladiators and the war between the senate and those who wanted…

    Against

    • Agamemnon wanted to sack Troy for its wealth anyway but needed a cassus belli, which Paris, ever the goofball, had just provided. The Romans actually had a superior culture and had an empire that set the foundation for you to exercise your free speech, so you have just right…
    • Why do I even bother... You've already proven to me you can only mindlessly spew quotes that agree with you on the surface, so whatever I say you'll just whine about and call me a [insert a zero-effort insult that involves my political leaning and how it doesn't agree with your…
  39. 1039.

    Terrorism does more harm than good

    For

    • 1. Where is your evidence? 2. Some people just bomb a place trying to get attention. 3. Terrorists made be heros in some countries, but will be criminals in other countries. 4. Terrorist attacks can lead to having a war too. 5. People can become terrorists if they are angry…
    • Terrorist are bad because many people can die in one attack. Terrorists also just want to kill people. They want to kill themselves and kill other people. They can wipe out some of the population. In a war, government might send terrorist to bomb a place that is important to a…

    Against

    • "1. Where is your evidence? 2. Some people just bomb a place trying to get attention. 3. Terrorists made be heros in some countries, but will be criminals in other countries. 4. Terrorist attacks can lead to having a war too. 5. People can become terrorists if they are angry…
    • Terrorism is simply an extreme form of political expression. Given that terrorist attacks occur most often in countries which have despotic regimes, or in which no other form of political protest is available, these people use the only means they can of getting their point…
  40. 1040.

    Voting for Trump is irresponsible

    For

    • i showed common sense that my points show irresponsibility. even the congressional budget office says if we dont get our budget in order bad things might occur. as for obamacare, showed how preexisting conditions and medicaid were important to give people healthcare, and all…
    • instead of asking a bunch of irrelevant questions, con should be arguing why it's responsible to vote for trump. i argued why it's irresponsible to vote for trump.... because you're getting an irresponsible person into office.

    Against

    • Again common sense is very subjective. The congressional budget office may say that "if we don't get our budget in order bad things will happen". This I can agree to but when it comes to how the budget problem is solved there is no right way and stating that Trump's reduction…
    • That is faulty correlation. Saying that Trump is irresponsibility is projected onto the voters does not make any logical sense. 3 mere examples of Trumps political views doe not prove him to be irresponsible. You simply state some plausible outcomes of what would happen if he…
  41. 1041.

    The United States should end the War on Drugs

    For

    • It's times like these when I feel like I'm debating myself. I could be conceded and think that he didn't post because he didn't have a response but I would probably be wrong. Sometimes I wonder though. Anyway, there are a few things that I would like to clarify that might have…
    • I noticed that you're an LD person too. So, I'm going to debate as close as possible to LD style for the rest of the round. ---------- I'll begin with observations then move to my opponent's case and finish with my own. Observation: If I prove the resolution to be more true…

    Against

    • I am generally in favor of less restriction on currently illegal narcotics, but your opening statement seems to assert that the US should legalize all or most drugs. This is problematic because drugs with strong addictive properties do have predominately adverse effects and…
  42. 1042.

    The war on terror should be fought domestically

    For

    • [I reserve the right to clarify and substantiate my remarks in rounds 2 through 5: graynet2013, the following are suppositions, premises, and challenges to any opponent] Our troops are fighting a war abroad against a virulent group of fanatics that have been bent on terror for…

    Against

    • M'kay...
    • Too bad I won't officially win this debate because no one seems to vote anymore...
  43. 1043.

    All illegal immigrants should be repatriated

    For

    • Illegal immigration is facilitated by criminal networks
    • States have the sovereign right to control their own borders.

    Against

    • Alternatives are better
    • Repatriation is immoral
  44. 1044.

    Israel is the aggressor in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

    For

    • My opponent shall start with an argument against the topic, and then I shall offer my rebuttal.

    Against

    • wow... another forfeit
    • Great, A forfeit. My previous argument still stands
  45. 1045.

    Illegal immigration harms American safety, finances, education, and culture

    For

    • 1.How do illegal immigrants have a negative effect on the economy, you ask? You note that many of the jobs they take are jobs people don't want. Of course they don't want them, at the wages employers pay illegals. That being said, this is the second-most asserted statement,…
    • The invasion of the United States by illegal aliens, primarily over our southern borders, imperils the country's financial, educational, and medical institutions, our environmental quality, and in fact, the very culture of the United States. For years, the willful…

    Against

    • How do illegal immigrants have a negative effect on the American economy? Many of the jobs they take are the sort that people don't want, such as cleaning public toilets. Although some jobs they take are the sort students take part-time, there are other jobs students can take.…
    • I did not claim that FAIR made up the statistics. I claimed that their biases would cause them to get certain statistics and interpret them in ways that further their cause. I brought up SPLC as an organisation that supports my viewpoint, just as FAIR supports yours. Americans…
  46. 1046.

    Hillary Clinton did not break the law with her email server

    For

    • kj
    • i guess i concede the debate

    Against

    • I guess this concludes the debate
    • Thank you. As I debated previously (http://www.debate.org...), the question has never been whether Hillary Clinton actually broke the law. It's a matter of whether politics is allowed to take precedence over the law; whether certain individuals are above the law. Apparently the…
  47. 1047.

    Barack Obama was one of the worst US presidents

    For

    • I am happy to debate someone.

    Against

    • Why are there 5 round debates again?
    • arrrrrg
  48. 1048.

    Supporting Labour or Conservatives in the UK is foolish

    For

    • Okay, I will wait for the next round.
    • My opponent says: "My opponent seems to think corporations are bad. I will argue the contrary argument in this case. The Labor Party, Liberal Democrat Party, and the Conservative Party should have ties with corporations in order to improve the economy further. How strong of…

    Against

    • Extend all arguments.
    • ARGUMENTS: "Firstly, I don't think that corporations are necessarily bad, it more complicated than that. And secondly I agree that the government should have ties with organisations, though only to better the society."I understand now. "The fact that they avoid tax and have had…
  49. 1049.

    Warring countries should take responsibility for the refugees they create

    For

    • First off, thanks for accepting my first debate. I look forward to seeing the viewpoint of whoever chooses to stand against me. I am very much of the belief that countries who get involved in wars in which the displacement of civilians on a massive scale is inevitable, should…

    Against

    • I guess he gave up.
    • It is ridiculous to expect countries involved in war to take responsibility for the refugees their war has created. This is a nice idealistic thought, and that's it.
  50. 1050.

    The use of biological weapons should be prohibited under all circumstances

    For

    • I'm offended.I mean, I feel like I just held the door for a feminist who refused to walk through but chose to chastise me for my chivalry. Proper etiquette dictates that I provide you the opportunity for first argument. This is the thanks I get for being a nice guy.You stated a…
    • Let me get this straight on what you're arguing. You're against biological weapons because of the negative economic impact on the country they hit. Forget all of the people suffering with horribly painful reactions to biological agents. Forget the mass exodous of refugees from…

    Against

    • The one thing I want to know is what you are arguing. This is a debate so, instead of blabbing on about what I didn't include maybe you should include an argument yourself. And about the one actual point that you did have, the economical damage could kill more people than the…
    • The use of biological weapons is destructive and effects the economy hugely. They prevent normal transaction from occurring and with that happening we would have no meetings or large face to face transaction. It would cost over 5 trillion dollars to create enough medicine to…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.