Discussly

Politics Debate Topics — page 15

3,631 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 15 of 73
  1. 701.

    Europe should become a federal state

    For

    • A federal Europe will protect the cultural diversity of its member states
    • A federal Europe will ensure that large, multinational businesses remain accountable for their actions

    Against

    • Moves toward federalism will endanger the stability of the EU
    • Subsidiarity will deal with regional identities' problem
  2. 702.

    The spread of nuclear weapons may be beneficial

    For

    • Deterrence
    • both sides will avoid threatening vital interests

    Against

    • Proliferation risks
    • Pre-emptive Nuclear war
  3. 703.

    The US government should cut military spending

    For

    • Yes, we do need to make a point. But we have a different threat at hand. They are a new threat, one that we haven't seen before. Our military is equipped to fight organized militaries. They are not organized, so we do bombings which are ineffective. On top of that, if we do…
    • Claiming that we will all die is a huge exaggeration. In 2015 we had a military budget of 598.5 million dollars. China, the second biggest military is 5x smaller. Saudi Arabia is about 10x smaller. Regarding nuclear power, we have thousands more than China. I assure you with…

    Against

    • Launching 2,000 nuclear weapons would destroy the planet- we can only fight these maniacs with conventional weaponry- tanks, guns, carpet bombing, etc. These guys have made it abundantly clear that they want war, so wew need to make it abundanbtly clear to them that we are…
    • The US should not cut military spending because we are at war with the Muslims. Infact we need to tripple military spending because if we don't, we are ALL gonna die.
  4. 704.

    Individual privacy should be valued above national security

    For

    • I Forfeit this round, I'll post my agruments the next round
    • The Terms for this debate round be the LD debate round. 1. 1AC 2.C/X 3. 1NC 4.C/X 5. 1AR 6. 1NR 7. 1NC 8. voting period. No using Wikipedia as a credible source. Do you accept these terms? Aff: Fundamental Rights Why should we live in a nation that values protection above our…

    Against

    • Fundamental Rights Contention 1: National security should not be over-valued. Yes, NOTHING should be OVER-VALUED, including privacy. To over-value privacy means that the government cannot access private records even of persons who are suspected (with good evidence making such…
    • National Security should be valued above individual privacy because: 1) You can't have any measure of individual privacy if you're dead, so government must take whatever measures are necessary to obtain the information necessary to protect us from terrorism both from at home…
  5. 705.

    People should be able to cross borders freely

    For

    • Well of course we shouldn't just up and eliminate it it should be gradual the same with welfare like let there be restrictions on it like first at the most 2 years than 1 then 6 months and so on. Just because they have been paying for it all their life dosen't make it right.…
    • I don't see how there would be a need to teach Americans spanish. If anything there would be a higher need to teach english to immigrants. Did Americans have to learn Italian,Polish,Czech and every other launage when they mass immigrated here? No its natural process. My…

    Against

    • First of all, your philosophy on welfare is twisted, it is not a "I suffered so should you policy", although it would be with your plan, but rather, a "I suffered, and don't want to put you through the same misery." Also, I don't see how Social Security can be "wrong", it is a…
    • So, what you are saying is that you would like to abolish the Social Security that people have been paying into for years, and that the government should have no control over education, or health care, or Medicaid, or Medicare that people have been relying on and paying for all…
  6. 706.

    The United States should increase its involvement against ISIS

    For

    • Of course in the long term it would make sense that it only works with political solutions. However, Iraq seemingly has little to no resistance against ISIS. The people who are doing this do not care or have any reason to listen to us. A political solution to this problem is…
    • I agree that it would be inevitable that we would have civilian casualties. But, that is hardly an argument when you consider the alternative. ISIS is a violent extremist group that is tearing through the middle east with little consideration for human life. Those who are of…

    Against

    • In an effort to remain fair, I have attempted to limit this round to rebuttals only. You write that the inevitability of civilian casualties is hardly an argument when the alternative is considered. The alternative being that ISIS continues its 'rampage' in Iraq? The civilian…
    • In the interest of fairness, I have placed no rebuttals to your round 2 argument, and unless you disagree, I believe we should limit round 3 to rebuttals only. I agree that the US should make humanitarian efforts in Iraq in order to help those displaced by ISIS. However,…
  7. 707.

    The two-party system should be abolished

    For

    • First of all, my opponent seems to think that I support more than two parties. This is not the case. I agree that more parties would lead to less efficiency. It stands to reason, however, that if more parties make it less efficient then no parties would be more efficient. As to…
    • First off let me apologize to my opponent for the short debate. I haven't been on this site for a while and I forgot that the acceptance counted as a round. With that out of the way, my opponent challenged me to come up with a replacement for the two party system. I think it…

    Against

    • My opponents alternative is to have no political parties at all. But, the problem is, the framers absolutely hated political parties. They despised them. The constitutions intent was to set up a government, not set up political parties. But, they formed anyway because Alexander…
    • My opponent still has not provided another system that will replace the two party political system, a more democratic system does not mean there are more than two major political parties. Furthermore, what is a "regular democracy?" C1. The United States has had a two party…
  8. 708.

    Candidates for political office should publish full financial histories online

    For

    • Financial dealings can indicate candidates' willingness to circumvent the system/play by the rules
    • This information offers valuable texture to the financial proposals candidates offer as potential policy

    Against

    • Fixating on candidates' financial records fuels the fire of class war
    • The focus of elections should be on policy, not personal issues like financial records
  9. 709.

    America has a duty and right to preserve itself

    For

    • ( A ) Con replied,' "Don't go self-righteous, making falsified claims. it's not supporting your character, and it's counter productive to your debate. One must remember in a debate also, they are not obligated to continue, IF honestly they are aware they have no grounds to do…
    • lookingattheissues2 response, to GoOrDin The Swiss philosopher, Emmerich de vatel opined, " Self defense is a natural right.Every nation, as well as every man, has, therefore, a right to prevent other nations from obstructing her preservation, her perfection, and happyness that…

    Against

    • The Government is not the USA. The USA is the people. The People have no Duty to preserve the boundaries or legal dispositions that are placed over and around them. The People have no right, to put others less than equal to them, because they are external to those borders,…
    • "You obviously believe by what you posted that America is the only country where crooked and unscrupulous public officials reside and that its citizens are the worst scourges of all societies and believe that if it weren't for America, and its people it would be a perfect…
  10. 710.

    A third party based on surveys will succeed

    For

    • I won't even try to argue with that!
    • I am introducing a hypothetical new third party called the "Survey Party". The outline of the party can be found here: http://thenewthirdparty.blogspot.com... The gist of the party is that each issue is surveyed and the results of the survey form the platform of the party. The…

    Against

    • My opponent has provided no reason to believe in his position, nor posted an argument. In light of the fact that I am defending the status quo, and have only the burden of rejoiner, my opponent is conversely arguing for reform, and arguing for change, and created the debate, it…
    • I'll wait for my opponent to actually make an argument, and therefore fulfil his burden of proof, before continuing in the debate.
  11. 711.

    Security should take priority over liberty

    For

    • con argues it is never harmful to have too much liberty. that is just wrong. if we can wiretap Bob and prevent a terrorist attack, it is harmful to not wire tap him in the name of giving more liberty to the population. con argues it is bette to be dead than have no liberty.…
    • security is greater than liberty it is common, and frankly par for the course, for people to quote many great founders, that say that he who wishes for security over liberty, deserves neither liberty or security. here i am mostly referring to things like the NSA spying on…

    Against

    • 3R1NRC: On "Bob"Liberty is a human right; it is so important that the violation of it would mean the violation of all means of living. The opponent's example, hypothetical to say the least, of this "Bob" character and how wiretapping him would result in the prevention of a…
    • xtend
  12. 712.

    Australia should change its national flag

    For

    • In conclusion, my hypothesis is that Australia is its own independent nation, but yet the flag still bears the flag of Great Britain. Australia and New Zealand are the only two nations that have gained independence, and kept the motherland flag as part of their own. To…
    • Because MURICA!

    Against

    • In conclusion, the two important points that I have covered in this debate is that Australian flag is already known internationally as it used in all important events that Australia participating and it is not cheap to change the current Australian flag because we were tied to…
    • Dear opponent, why should we change our current flag to the USA one? We were a colony of England, but we were never American. My first point is that the Australian"s flag is already recognised internationally. The officials had used the current flag during important events such…
  13. 713.

    The United States should abolish birthright citizenship

    For

    • My opponent has not attacked any of my arguments nor defended any of his own.
    • Seeing as how my opponent has forfeit round 2, I will just be reinforcing my rebuttals.Again, in my opponent's first contention he cites a flawed study. I have shown that the illegal immigration rate is currently dropping fast, and that fewer children will be born to illegal…

    Against

    • Hey thanks for accepting! And sorry about the typo... let us begin! Today I will present the three primary reasons that abolishing birthright citizenship would be disadvantageous to the United States. -Repealing birthright citizenship will increase the number of illegal…
    • Your case must be based on fact and any facts asserted must be supported with evidence from a source. My opponent, CON, will argue that the net benefits of birthright citizenship do not outweigh the costs and thus the US should abolish it. I will argue that the net benefits of…
  14. 714.

    The current government should be completely replaced

    For

    • Obama has been in office, increasing from $5,749,916,000,000 at the end of January 2009 to $11,825,322,000,000 at the end of January 2014, according to the U.S. Treasury's latest. from http://cnsnews.com... A Border Patrol official who was removed from his position in June is…
    • I will do pro our government needs to be replaced my opponent will do con our government is perfect. Our government was mad at china for hacking us when Edward Snowden released top secret documents that shows our government was wiretapping other world leaders phones which is…

    Against

    • Ayyyyyy we done here boys.
    • Almost done...
  15. 715.

    The US should shift military spending to education and NASA

    For

    • "It is not hard to make a rocket at all." Unless you work at NASA, I don't think you would understand the mechanics that go into making the rockets engines and thousands of intricate parts. They don't just slap fins and metal together. The process of building a rocket can take…
    • You're right, US education isn't the best. You want to abandon the education of children just because the system is 'broken'? A nation with that way of thinking wouldn't last long. By putting money into education, we can improve it. It's really that simple. By spending money to…

    Against

    • If it's hard for nasa to make a rocket then there's a problem there. Shouldn't they be smarter and should be easier for the people in nasa? Why should we give more money to people who can't make a rocket? All you have been doing is agreeing with me. Also you say the U.S. spends…
    • Money doesn't solve everything. The problem with the education system starts with congress. If you want to fix the education system then either elect the right congressmen for the job to fix the education system or run for a position. Money won't be the solution. In many places…
  16. 716.

    America should continue to participate in the military coalition against ISIS

    For

    • In conclusion, ISIS has gained incredible notoriety in the media and for good reasons such as robbing, killing and pillaging. They are a growing terrorist cell, and are causing widespread terror. Isis is the greatest threat to world security since the beginning of the 21st…
    • I as side affirmative firmly believe that this resolution will and must stand. I has already explained in great detail the extremist group that is the Islamic State, and the need for military action. I will be talking mainly about why America should participate in this military…

    Against

    • Sorry it"s taken me so long to get back to you, with the inclement weather weather in my area, my soccer schedule and whatnot. Any who, I"d never abandoned a decent debate regardless. To answer your questions - How could we ensure the protection of humanitarian aid: The answer…
    • Ah yes, good morning to you as well, I"d imagine you"ve probably done some research on my profile to figure out who exactly I am by now which I wouldn"t blame you. I"m fairly new to Debate.org but not to debate, I Debate in the National Forensics League as a US Student. I"m…
  17. 717.

    The United States should launch a preemptive attack on North Korea

    For

    • you mention that china has troops around korea. that's only because they dont want their people in china and because korea is unstable. china has not mentioned a word about wanted to militarily defend korea, and no one ever talks about it. this is all a novel idea brought up by…
    • con says to be weary of china and russia. they are self interested and would not be interested in a war. they haven't expressed that they would be if we attacked, and it doesn't make sense that they would. theyd much rather let us fight it out and try to deal with any…

    Against

    • "The Sino-North Korean Mutual Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty is a treaty signed on July 11, 1961 between North Korea and the People's Republic of China." this is a treaty with the north korea and china. Do you know why it's important? It because china would protect them…
    • First of all China does have a huge role in this North Korea and US crisis. China does not want the US in Korea period. You need to understand the history of Korea and china, and the President does not seem like he is understanding what China position is. Why you think China…
  18. 718.

    Gerrymandering should remain legal in the United States

    For

    • In the case for the 2010 republican blow out, this was a reactionary measurement republicans took as a result of Obama"s victory and his terrible health care agenda. The republicans planned these state representative victories and redistricting for years unlike the democrats…
    • I don"t believe political gerrymandering limits democracy in any way and it is justifiably constitutional.

    Against

    • My opponent brings up how 2010 was a republican blowout, this is true, but I would argue the reason they have maintained control of the house is because of gerrymandering. As pointed out in the previous round, there are at least 13 seats they gained or are maintaining from…
    • First, my opponent suggested that anybody could use gerrymandering to their advantage, however this is not the case. Whoever is in power at the time is the party that benefits from gerrymandering(as it's the party in power that sets up the districts), and when redistricting…
  19. 719.

    South Ossetia has a right to self-determination

    For

    • The 1993 Vienna Declaration, which reaffirmed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter (and so sets the standard in current international law), unequivocally gives all peoples the right to self-determination: "All people have the right to self-determination.…
    • "South Ossetians, too, have the right to self-determination". Daily Telegraph. 11 Aug. 2008

    Against

    • Self-determination is not an absolute right. Not every territory and region in the world that seeks independence has the right to it. This is due in no small part to the fact that such a system would be unworkable. Certain criteria must be met for a territory and people to…
  20. 720.

    The UK was right to vote to leave the European Union

    For

    • This debate is Round 2 of Tejretics's Summer Tournament. I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate and wish him good luck going forward.RulesNo Kritiks.No Trolling.No Google Docs, all arguments must be presented in text in the debate.All sources shall be…
    • My opponent is very vague here talking about. The UK has been the only nation that's even voted on leaving the EU let alone actually left. My opponent then has moved into talking about the potential loss of economic clout in the market place. The EU allows nations that leave…

    Against

    • United we stand....I wonder how leaving the European Union would be a correct decision. Remember all those countries that split and realised painfully that somehow the whole was bigger than sum of the parts?UK could lose being the preeminent leader in the financial markets.…
    • I accept. I am looking forward for a good debate.
  21. 721.

    America is the most ethical superpower in history

    For

    • Honestly, I don"t even care about winning, I just wanted to have a good debate. I hope everyone votes for you just so you stop crying like a little girl. It"s actually quite difficult to find a superpower with an ethical record, but some are less bad. Britain is often regarded…
    • Well Con, The list of superpowers throughout history is quite long, so it would be ridiculous to compare America to every single one of them. I was hoping you'd make a suggestion since your Con. Anyways, since you"re just trying to win on technicalities and haven"t made any…

    Against

    • Honestly, if you wanted to have a good debate, you should have written a good resolution. I hope everyone votes for me just so you'll learn your lesson, write a better topic, and you can have a legitimate debate next time. I would also like to Pro has violated the character…
    • Well Pro, You're written a resolution chock-full of loopholes that anyone can win this debate with technicalities. You should have stated the topic wisely. Ever - at any time[1] Exist - to have actual being; be[2] In other words, you must prove how America is more ethical than…
  22. 722.

    Politics does more harm than good

    For

    • This is the start of a 3 round argument. Your objective is to try to convince me on how politics (different from government), is completely arbitrary and of no use to us. There are really no rules accept to avoid stupidity, thanks. ----------- My Argument: Politics is…
    • My final response is short and to the point. I don't care for voting, and "sides". What I care about is what the officials do when they get elected. The majority go corrupt, sell out to private businesses. Politics is easily corruptible, but yet we still participate? We put all…

    Against

    • Fine, I'll bite.There are much more forms of democracy that work better. Like representative democracy. You have more than two parties which you vote on, and then 150 seats are divided by all those parties based on how many votes they have. The government does help people. It…
    • Closing argument incoming. I don't live in America but in Holland. I don't want to sound holier than thou but corruption here is really low. The main problem here is not corporations towering over the government, but tax money being too high and thus discouring entrepeneurship.…
  23. 723.

    Communism and fascism are fundamentally opposed

    For

    • Extend?
    • http://www.youtube.com...Remember, patriotism is a great gift!

    Against

    • The resolution states that they are almost complete opposites.If I can prove that the are either absolute opposites (hence not 'almost') or not opposites but just different then I can win this debate.I accept.
  24. 724.

    The United Nations has done more good than harm

    For

    • Since I have nothing to go against, I must colclude, saying that although I think it is, the UN is not a waste of time. My refrences were from wikipedia, but checked on other websites. Good luck iObject, and God Bless.
    • I know that the rules of engagement are dumb, but they are also helpful. Imagine what the military would be like without them. The Vietnam War was a different story, sometimes you would have to destroy a village to help your team. After the war, it was found out that 700,000…

    Against

    • The League of Nations was a waste of time too. plus I didn't mean to say it was a complete waste of time. The U.N. is important in making some decisions but other than that, it is a WASTE of time. The Super Power countries of China and Russia just veto anything the U.S. is for,…
    • To begin, i will say that the United Nations is a almost completely useless. This organization is full of representatives to countries that are not there for the better of their people and the world, but more to shoot down the suggestions of countries that are their enemies.…
  25. 725.

    There should be no minimum voting age

    For

    • So let me see if I have this straight. You want me to source my argument? Here is the National Youth Rights Association (NYRA) website: http://www.youthrights.org...
    • I don't want to sound like a retard, but what did you just say up there?

    Against

    • Extend my position.
    • I await my opponent's affirmation, definitions, and supporting information for her affirmation. Affirmation - an affirmation is a statement you are trying to debate for. Usually done in the "I affirm that _Topic___of___debate" format. In this case your affirmation would be I…
  26. 726.

    The EPA should be abolished

    For

    • "European nations and the United States used insecticides to rid themselves of disease and then pulled up the ladder, denying Africans, Asians and Latin Americans the benefits of those same insecticides," explain Dr. Donald Roberts and Richard Tren in their 2010 expos", The…
    • I will give my sources and reasoning now. The EPA has done nothing but put strict regulations on things they deem bad for the environment, but actually have little proof for it. For example, their ban on DDT has caused the death of many in Africa because of malaria. DDT was…

    Against

    • I'd like to begin this round by asking my opponent to clarify his sources. Pro has made multiple claims in round 3, and then left a group of sources at the bottom. I'm not going to waste my time going through each source to determine which argument each source supports. I…
    • Pro claims that the EPA banned DDT for selfish reasons. Pro also claims that the US ban of DDT has caused the deaths of many people throughout the world. As can be found on the EPA's on website "It is up to individual countries to decide whether or not to use DDT".…
  27. 727.

    The Electoral College is outdated

    For

    • Well, I believe that if I say anything else in this debate I will begin being tempted to debate myself. I would have enjoyed more interaction on this subject. I guess I will have to keep looking around.
    • I will continue making general statements in the meantime until I hear a response. Outdated means "having passed its time of use or usefulness" according to the Webster's Dictionary. If we consider the long history and current use of the E.C. we can clearly see that by…

    Against

    • Just because it represents our country, doesn't mean it's not outdated. If we have freedom of who we elect, then how come some people in a building decide who we elect? Yes our votes can influence the E.C., but they make the real choice. When will we really be able to elect our…
    • The electoral college is outdated because one very stupid attribute of the electoral college is the fact that people don't actually elect their leader. They send hundreds of thousands of votes to the E.C., but even if somebody won by 500,000 votes, the other could still win.
  28. 728.

    Limits on press and speech freedom hinder Rwanda's progress

    For

    • International concern
    • Authoritarian leadership

    Against

    • Setting Rwanda's priorities
    • There is accountability without a free press
  29. 729.

    The UN should prioritize global poverty reduction over all other issues

    For

    • Due to matt's forfeit of this 3 round debate i see no reason to cover old ground, merely state that due to the fact he has presented no counterarguments to anything within my case, as the old debate adage goes, "Silence breeds agreement", he therefore agree's with my entire…
    • Before I delve into the mechanics of this debate round I would like to make the following observation: Xlilmattx's information page (. http://www.debate.org...) states that he has "Post Doctoral" education, makes more than $150, 000 a year, is 23 years old, and work in the…

    Against

    • Resolved: When in conflict the UN should priotize global poverty over environmental protection. I will make the following definitions clear. Poverty is defined by the World Bank as a state of living in which capable of adults live on less than 2.50 US dollars per day.…
  30. 730.

    Virginia should ban smoking in restaurants

    For

    • My opponent brought out some of my mistakes and hopefully I can use what he said to improve my argument. Yes, Bill Hicks did say that about smoking, but after smelling that person, would they not want to go to that restaurant again from fear of having that smell while they eat.…
    • I would like to begin my arguement with a theory. A family is very concious about their health. When they go to a restaurant, there are ussually two sides, smoking and non-smoking. they would obviously choose the non-smoking side. what if the only thing separating these to…

    Against

    • Public smoking is still an extremely controversial issue in America today, and hopefully we have offered some new perspectives on this particular point of contention to the readers of the debate. I want to reconstruct my argument around a single statement from my opponent's…
    • In my first argument for the negative, I will make the argument that no change is needed in the status quo, that no government regulation is required regarding smoking in restaurants. Instead, as I will show, restaurants as profit-seeking entities will continue to naturally…
  31. 731.

    Missile defence systems do more harm than good

    For

    • DUH!!!!!! you forgot one thing if you have that missiles you won't afraid of the other bomb and if they make something that you think it's wrong you will taunt them and war will start and it will make global warming too because ICBM has a............ something that it kills you…
    • why because every thing will end at war right? for example do you think if you make bomb your enemy will make dynamite then you make C4 so your opponent will make nuclear and you will make hydrogen bomb and it will end at war

    Against

    • "if you have that missiles you won't afraid of the other bomb" Are you suggesting that the United States would not take the threat of WMDs seriously? As a reminder, the U.S. already does have missles and other WMDs, however, that doesn't mean that we would take other countries…
    • "National Missile Defense (NMD) as a generic term is a military strategy and associated systems to shield an entire country against incoming Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). The missiles could be intercepted by other missiles, or possibly by lasers. They could be…
  32. 732.

    The international community should support French intervention in Mali

    For

    • France intervention in Mali was justified in a case of dangerous islamist incursions in the north part of the country and the developpement of aqmi in the region. French troops are doing a good job with the support of African troops. But other NATO countries should provide more…

    Against

    • You forfeited the last round, if you really want to debate start it again.
    • Seeing that you forfeited this round again, I do not know if you are taking this seriously.
  33. 733.

    Humanitarian crimes are a bad justification for attacking ISIS

    For

    • aaaand, he forfeits....
    • Framework Let's talk about what this round will be as my opponent seems to have seriously missed what the point of the match is. If you refer back to the very first paragraph I make it clear that I instigate this debate in order to improve my PFD ability, that being the case I…

    Against

    • Before we dive in, let's cover a few definitions: Attacking: To attack in any way, including, but not limited to, military attack, political, verbal, etc. ISIS: the Islamic State of greater Iraq and Syria; the terrorist regime. Humanitarian crimes: any crimes that violate the…
  34. 734.

    Anarcho-capitalism is an impossible political system

    For

    • Prior argument, I may have been online but I wasn't home. Oh dear, what shall I ever do...well here it is: Anarchism: a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and…
    • Anarchy is the absolute absence of hierarchy in society. This means that a state structure is impossible, this means that an undemocratic/hierarchical military is impossible, this means that capitalism can't exist. My reasoning why anarchy will not/can not exist in a capitalist…

    Against

    • Thanks hailtothethief. ==Definitions== My opponent's definition from Merriam-Webster's dictionary I agree with, stating that "Anarchism [is] a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on…
    • According to cliff, my opponent was online. I assume he saw my awesome refutations and decided to concede. I still thank him for the great debate. Sincerely yours, bluesteel
  35. 735.

    The NHS should be privatised

    For

    • First of all I haven't helped you at all. I have not pointed out that privatisation of the NHS will lead to greed; I have pointed out it will ensure the continuity of the vital health care services our country needs as it can not carry on the way it is with the population…
    • Yes there are bound to be problems with privatising the NHS but there are problems with the NHS as it is. The NHS was not designed to care for a 21st century Britain where they have to cater for people living, people getting fatter and fatter or people with terminal illnesses…

    Against

    • If we Privatise the NHS, greedy people will want money. No money is earned operating the NHS unless austerity is literally quadrupled, and well, that's way too bigger burden. By having the NHS state-owned then no private company needs to be persuaded to loose money, and no one…
    • Thanks for helping me! The NHS can be improved by making it more aimed to the people, privatisation is really going to lead to greed. There is no more I can say.
  36. 736.

    Voters should have the power to recall elected officials

    For

    • "I am Aristotle, and I approve of Recall Elections!" Indeed, a recall election as described above is not a new political and democratic tool, it has been around since Aristotle's Constitution of Athens in which he notes the story of the laws of Solon.…
    • "A recall election is a form of direct democracy in which citizens are able to cut short the term of an elected representative through a public vote. Particular mechanisms vary, but usually involve a petition signed by members of the public. If a sufficient proportion of the…

    Against

    • Pro believes that a recall of election is a form of direct democracy, however we in the United States do not have a direct democracy system. Also we have the power to vote the president out of office every four years, representatives every two years, and senators every six…
    • I accept and look forward to this debate
  37. 737.

    The UN should have a standing military force

    For

    • Alright Emily here are the reasons why UN should have a standing army:1. It's not effective as it is "The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945 after the Second World War by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security,…
    • UN: United Nations, the famous peace-keeping force of the worldMilitary force: an army of soldier under the UN's command that can be deployed whenever necessaryHonored to be debating an unbeaten. :DRound one acceptance only.

    Against

    • Thanks 9spaceking. I'll now begin with presenting my own case. The UN is not a NationThe first argument against the UN having a "standing" army is based on the fact that throughout history--and this is lasting into the present day--only countries and nations are really eligible…
    • Challenge accepted. Thanks to 9spaceking for sending this debate--likewise it's a pleasure to debate with an experienced member such as yourself. As Con: I will be arguing that the UN should *not* have a standing military force.
  38. 738.

    Entertainers should not take part in party-political campaigns

    For

    • Personality politics is harmful to the democratic process
    • This is an unjust use of unelected power

    Against

    • Celebrity involvement can highlight minority interests
    • Celebrity involvement can act as a 'gateway' to get more people engaged in politics
  39. 739.

    Left and right are meaningless concepts in politics

    For

    • My opponant does not know the meaning of the word Libertarian. Libertarians are neither left nor right. Libertarians have a little bit of both. Libertarians are progay like the liberals, and progun like the conservatives for example. Like I always say, liberal and conservative…
    • Let me state why I believe that liberal versus conservative are false paradigms. As a minarchist Libertarian, I see good and bad on both sides. I agree with liberals on not policing the world, on contraception, on women having rights, but I disagree with liberals on…

    Against

    • Highest respect for opponent. Please take as token of genuine interest, not urge to antagonize, Thank you, user-name.
    • Wings have absolutely nothing to do with gun rights now homosexuality.The wing, as I explain in round 1, purely refers to the way in which the government goes about enforcing its laws. You identified yourself as a Minarchist Libertarian; this is a right-wing Libertarian if you…
  40. 740.

    American global hegemony is harmful to the world

    For

    • Benign hegemons still cause counterbalancing Christopher layne 2002 "offshore balancing revisited" other states will draw the opposite conclusion: that the united states is too powerful and that its hegemony must be resisted. Even if the us foreign and defense policies remain…
    • Well first: the entire purpose of multipolarity is multiple world powers. US hegemony cannot coexist without backlash or counterbalancing from other countries. In other words, a benign US hegemony does not work, other countries inevitably get angered. There is a ton of evidence…

    Against

    • Im not sure what world you live in where hegemony and pulling together other powerful nations to accomplish a single cause are seperate entities, but in this world, multilateralism has been a part of almost every major hegemon's plans in recent history. Im not sure how it…
    • - Youre assuming the US is going to aggrivate backlash. A good hegemon and any hegemon are two different things. The US has sustained its placment as a hegemon and used that to get the UN and its related bodies to promote US interest. - Countries will see the US as an enemy no…
  41. 741.

    Representative democracy is better than direct democracy

    For

    • It's a lot less work.
    • The complexity of many political issues would make some of them difficult for the average voter to understand.

    Against

    • One-Party System
    • Rule for the people or of the people?
  42. 742.

    Governments that instill more fear face greater risk of civil disorder

    For

    • I am happy I meet a very strong opponent on my first debate here (I scanned through your records), but I do have compelling arguments for my resolution. Well, part of. My opponent has failed to address my proper claim that not only authoritarian governments utilize fear as a…
    • Firstly, I would like to attack the claim that only authoritarian states use fear as a tool. Not one government since written history did not use fear as a tool to control its people. There are many ways of using fear. One of the most common ways is through polices, military,…

    Against

    • Thanks Coltrane. My opponent concedes that fear leads to less civil disorder when comparing autocracies to each other. Thus, I've proven that the resolution fails to hold true at least 50% of the time. Even if my opponent DID prove that it holds true the other 50% of the time,…
    • Thanks Coltrain. I decided to cite an online source, rather than Collier (which is from a book), so my opponent could access it. C1) U-shaped relationship between regime type and political violence/unrest According to Thomas David Mason in the book Caught in the Crossfire,…
  43. 743.

    The UK voting age should be lowered to 16

    For

    • In my opinion it depends what school a teacher is at- if they are at a ordinary secondary school then, I agree, most teachers would be left wing party supporters. But if the teacher is at a private school then, due to a more upper class view on life, they would most likely be a…
    • But without school teachers a pupil cannot gain information about the left wing parties, what is good/bad about them etc. Or if they were going to vote other than left wing they would gain knowledge of the left wings bad points. I do not agree with your statement that if…

    Against

    • I agree on the OAPs being problem in regard to questions of pension budgets and that is something that concerns me, however to the question of 16 year olds and voting; school really is a propaganda factory for left wing parties, I remember one of my teachers at school running…
    • 18 gives youngsters more time to gain experience of the world outside of school which is important. School is biased towards Socialist/left wing policies and the effect of this on your rationality at age 16 is important. When people enter the working world they became more…
  44. 744.

    Democracy is not the best form of government

    For

    • Im disappointed to see that Con forfeited the last round. Well if Con wishes to use the last round to do both his rebuttal and closing statement, he can feel free to. For my closing argument, I will reiterate my position. Democracy is not the best form of government. Allowing…
    • I did not make a common error. Not allowing "everyone- to vote violates what a democracy stands for. For example, let me clarify the last three definition of aristocracy from dictionary.com: 3. government by those considered to be the best or most able people in the state 4. a…

    Against

    • Terribly sorry about the forfeit, you know how it is. Busy and whatnot. Alas, my business pervades this particular point in the Universal Time line, so I'm afraid I shan't be making any more cases. Yes, this means you probably will win. Kudos to you.
    • In your assessment of democracy, you made a common error that most everyone also makes: just because not everyone can vote does not mean that a given society is not a democracy. For example, in Athens, the system of government was in fact a democracy. True, women and slaves…
  45. 745.

    Presidents should not be involved in restorative therapy policy

    For

    • Of course the President may use his "bully pulpit" to speak about his views on reparative therapy. It is, of course, ironic that he would use the "bully" pulpit in a matter where bullying people is so often the cause of pain, sadness, self-harm and even suicide. As for what he…
    • Your response questions the wisdom of, and denies the efficacy of, reparative therapy. In other words, you dispute the validity of reparative therapy. This debate addresses more than political choices that Obama may make. As a constitutional officer, he is sworn to defend the…

    Against

    • Your original statement "restorative therapy is no place for the president to be involved". I do not have to defend whether it is constitutionally allowed for the president to ban any form of therapy, because that is not what he is doing. I am making the point that it is…
    • President Obama chose to support this cause due to an online movement which was sparked by the suicide of a young transgender girl. The girl was placed in conversion therapy after beginning her transition from male to female. Her suicide note inspired many people to show their…
  46. 746.

    Eritrea should cede all its territory to Ethiopia

    For

    • https://docs.google.com...
    • If I can open one persons eyes to the evil. It will be all worth it. We can't pretend Africa's not there forever. It's time to reunify Ethiopia. https://docs.google.com...

    Against

    • I have come to two realizations.1) The pro is in fact an Ethiopian nationalist, who is merely projecting his irridentialist desires of territorial revanchism for Ethiopia. Was a video of the Ethiopian national anthem really neccessary? This debate was never meant to be about…
    • Point 1: Historical ties of dominationPro has conceded that historical ties can not determine which nations have or have not a right to self-determination.The only historical ties that linked Eritrea and Ethiopia were of domination. It is no surprise that Eritreans, even…
  47. 747.

    The NAACP helps African Americans more than it hinders them

    For

    • Thank you for your kind words, Con. I wish you all the best, and hope we'll have the opportunity to debate again soon. As for this debate, I did meet my burden of proof by demonstrating that the NAACP has (even if it was in the past) played an important and helpful role for…
    • Thank you, Con. I'll take a moment to acknowledge what I consider to be your sincere desire to bridge the racial divide, and alleviate fear, suffering, and isolation for people of all races – a desire which both I and the NAACP share, irrespective of whether we all agree upon…

    Against

    • I will make this round quick. I first want to again tell the Pro that I brought up that race must not be used as a factor in deciding items or choices because it will teach children that race does not change your life, for better or worse. That is why I brought up that point.…
    • We ought to take the default position that, as they claim to, the NAACP is concerned with fighting for social justice for all Americans" says my opposition. Yes the NAACP tells us that, however when looking at crimes that are black on white, like the beatings at Church and…
  48. 748.

    The Chagos Islands should be returned to Mauritius

    For

    • Uti Possidetis
    • Self determination

    Against

    • Marine protection
    • National interests
  49. 749.

    Global cooperation is the best path to world peace

    For

    • 1. Every country would eventually elect a new leader. Thus, we get new problems. Therefore, if we destroy every country and its inhabitants, there would be no problems. 2.This is not counterproductive. To have peace, there must be war. 1. Color blindness actually just hides the…
    • 1. Everything you are about to read is satirical but will work in creating world peace 2. I do not believe world peace is even possible, but if it is, this is how it is done. 3. Down to business 1. In order for world peace, we must destroy every other country in the world so…

    Against

    • 1. Useless. Countries don't cause war, their leaders and opposing beliefs do. We can keep countries, just remove other factors that start wars. Onto domestic issues... 1. Instead, create an infection that will be spread by air which will render ever race color blind. 2. I find…
    • New Proposal: 1. Create a class based system such as first, second, thirds, fourth 2. Have the govt develop and raise the children to be perfect for their jobs through genetic engineering. The fourth class people can be the laborers. They can be made to be very short and very…
  50. 750.

    The United States should purchase Greenland

    For

    • Greenlandic independence is sought by most of Greenland's population. For the purpose of the debate, we will assume that Greenland can be bought. Which is not totally unrealistic, given the people wanted us to in 1946. My opponent will begin in R1.
    • I accept my opponents concession

    Against

    • You win, ChrisWolff
    • I forfeit

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.