Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 49
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 2401.
A second American civil war is unlikely in our lifetime
For
- reiterate
- so con concedes that we might not have a civil war. pretty weak stance there. also just pointing out some reasons that a civil war could happen doesn't do much in the way of exacting why it actually would. civil wars haven't happened in most of europe. only in places where the…
Against
- Why I highly disagree.Russia is just provoking the US of A.And south Korea is just a ticking grenade.Just consider the following factors: 1st the economy is bad 2nd people are distrusting the higher-ups 3rd we may not have a civil war but we might have a war.
- It seems that my opponent is not getting the logical of this ("his") debate. Your title of the debate said "in our lifetime" meaning, as long we are to live. This debate isn't on weather it is happening right now as you are using "no indicators" but weather it is likely or not…
- 2402.
The United States should go to war with China
For
- ===DEFINITIONS=== United States of America (U. S. A) : . http://en.wikipedia.org... China (PROC): . http://en.wikipedia.org... War: . http://en.wikipedia.org... ===PRO ARGUMENT=== Firstly, such a move by the U. S. A would improve relations with China. Many of War's songs have a…
- It means that someone who holds your allegiance is. Taxes are the mechanism by which the entire nation is at war with Iraq. --> Partially true. The citizens of a state elect representatives to government. The choose these people to represent them in domestic, national and…
Against
- Both the USA and the PROC are terms for NATIONS-- involuntary groupings of people based on whether they live in territory under a given government's jurisdiction. In order for the statement "The USA went here" or "The PROC went here" to make sense, the entire population of the…
- " Furthermore, taxes are the mechanism in which everyone in the United States would take part, paying for the various expenses of such an endeavour as going to War with China." War, the state of affairs, and War, the concert of the band by that name, are completely different…
- 2403.
Barack Obama's economic policies were socialist
For
- Mr. Skeptic, I did spell Barack Obama incorrectly, you spelled "wanna" so now we are even, i'll try to avoid these errors in the future. But seeing as this is not a debate on grammar, I will now procede. Mr. Skeptic, I didn't hear that radio interview with Mr. Obama. What I am…
- I am proposing that our currunt president Barrack Obama is a socialist and is leading America down the wrong path as far as the economy, morals, and lifestyle.
Against
- Also, I wanna clarify with the audience in case they have qualms over the spelling: I'm quite positive that by "Barrack Obama" my opponent means "Barack Obama" so there will be no semantics in this debate. This is evident not only from the single addition of a letter, but also…
- =====Counterarguments===== 1. Socialism - Economy - Barack Obama My opponent accuses me of defining communism instead of socialism and "not respond[ing] to the statement that Mr. Obama said about 'spreading the wealth. '" It seems as if my opponent hasn't read my previous…
- 2404.
This house applauds the GMA administration's efforts to fight terrorism in Mindanao
For
- President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo should continue in fighting terrorism in Mindanao because if the terrorists there will know that there is this someone that who is always willing to fight against them, it will not be easy for them to terrorize the whole country. Besides,…
Against
- Extend... finally!
- Extend
- 2405.
The Republican Party is not right-wing
For
- Republicans have fought incredibly hard against liberals. Only 7 states and D.C. have not implemented any state laws regarding same-sex marriage, whereas 28 states have undertaken laws with the purpose to cut down on same-sex marriage and even ban it altogether." Then why don't…
- You, my friend, have not truly provided an argument. You simply said that my argument is my opinion. Based on the definition of conservative, I have proven that the GOP is not conservative, as it does not even attempt to propose legislation that would conserve America's social,…
Against
- To begin, I'd like to reference a poll that i will be using later in my rebuttal. According to a pew research poll only 30% of republicans are identified as moderate or liberal. That's much less than 50% or above. Using your opinions of conservative values however, you are…
- Republicans have fought incredibly hard against liberals. Only 7 states and D.C. have not implemented any state laws regarding same-sex marriage, whereas 28 states have undertaken laws with the purpose to cut down on same-sex marriage and even ban it altogether. The house…
- 2406.
War is a justified solution to serious conflicts
For
- here are the points which con is asking for - Post War time periods establish a balance of power creating peace through necessity. Tried to bring peace and prosperity in the 1920's, but it didn't work. Wars forces economic growth through a nation's conquests . For the most part…
- i agree with the con but thats the fact i was telling the fact with which everyone satisfies and now i going to tell which everyone do not get - 1) the development of the japan as a developed country after world war 2 http://en.wikipedia.org... - proves my statement
Against
- Obviously I'm going to rebut his points and, because he has the burden of proof as the affirmation, you vote negative by default. First and foremost, PRO plagiarized the entirety of what he has laid out here today from this debate: .…
- "i agree with the con but thats the fact i was telling the fact with which everyone satisfies and now i going to tell which everyone do not get."This statement is not written in coherent English. I haven't the slightest idea of what he's saying because he isn't writting…
- 2407.
The United States should require background checks for all gun sales
For
- Read the beginning of round 2.Vote positive!
- In this round, I will instruct my oppenent to reread my argument, as it is evident, from his rebuttals, that he has not comprehended them.Parte UnoBackground Checks Are, Indeed, Effective.Partito UnoThis argument is based on how the black market is rampant, but the logic of…
Against
- Before I conclude my arguments, I'd like to point out to those judging this debate that the affirmative's conduct is substandard. His refutations resort to false paraphrasing of the negative's arguments and aimless sourcethrowing without proper explanation of the content that…
- I remind both my opponent and those who are judging this debate that all rebuttals and points are directed at the opposing stance, not at the opposition themselves. In this round, I will attack the overarching arguments presented by my opponent before reinforcing the ground…
- 2408.
Firearms should be allowed in schools
For
- You have no argument .
- Not if you have good parents or teachers telling them to use them right. A gun that is openly carried does not promote killing.
Against
- Having guns in schools is pretty much giving kids permission to shoot people. And it affects learning.
- Yes, but most kids don't have good parents.
- 2409.
Gun control is necessary for a stable society
For
- Upon accepting, you will acknowledge the following definitions and terms in the debate. Gun: A weapon incorporating a metal tube from which bullets, shells, or other missiles are propelled by explosive force. Control: (In this instance) to determine the behaviour or supervise…
- I understand that a utopian society is highly improbable to ever exist, however I am being optimistic that we can reach somewhere close to the utopian society, or even to say the least move towards it more than we are currently today. As long as society advances, it should…
Against
- I understand, we all wish to strive to a Utopian society. But in a Utopian society there would be a means of effectively shutting down a crime as soon as the potential danger ensured. It will be hundreds of years before we have some way of doing that without turning the society…
- Yep, it's my first debate so I'm sorry if I say something weird. Also I am not trying to sound heartless, forgive me for sounding so cruel when I talk about homicides or mass shootings it's not intetional. I'm just trying not to bring emotion into my arguments, and keeping…
- 2410.
The United States should pause immigration for several years
For
- Cultures are developed using multiple outlets. For example my culture was developed over time stemming from multi-cultures. It's called the melting-pot and it only works if there is a pause on immigration. America used to understand that up and until around the 1960s when they…
- Starting this one short. We need time to develop culture. Right now our Culture is Kim Kardashian butt and our national debate is tranny bathrooms. America is divided and mass flow of immigration is partly to blame.
Against
- Unfortunately, America doesn't have just one culture does it. It is a Multi-Cultural society. So which particular Culture do you want to develop? Let me take a wild guess and suggest you would like to develop Your culture. So putting your proposition into it's proper context -…
- You've broadened the debate somewhat here so I'll only deal with points about the culture question. Race - You haven't said whether you would like to preserve the racial makeup of your culture so this is just a statement and not an argument against anything you've said. Anybody…
- 2411.
Guns should not be banned
For
- 1. I did respond saying that good guys are to VAST majority of good gun owners who stop crime. 2. I never said that where shootings take place defines gun-free zones. Where did you get this assumption? And you are right, Gun free zones are a fanciful notion. Amanda collins was…
- 1. The good guys are the VAST majority of gun owners who stop 800k to 2 million violent crimes each year. 2. No, Gun free-zones make up 96% of mass-shootings and women get raped in gun-free zones. 3. No, Mass killings can be committed with a SPOON. 4. Back it up with evidence…
Against
- 1) Pro paints a picture of a secure society guarded by honest armed citizen vigilantes. Is this really the U. S. A? 2) So Pro admits that gun free zones is a fanciful idea. A rapist is a rapist, That is a separate issue, Indirectly related to the proposition. 3) I've never…
- 1) Pro did not directly respond to my questioning. Nonetheless all the people responsible for gun deaths are people with guns. 2) I refer you to the response I gave earlier. Similarly, A zone where there are shootings is by definition not a gun free zone. 3) Pro's spoon…
- 2412.
The constitutions of democratic governments ought to include procedures for secession
For
- I have a few stipulations that must be agreed upon before the debate can commence. First, the resolution is an exercise in political philosophy, so the primary focus of the debate should be on philosophy rather than on practical examples. Although real-world instances can be…
Against
- The End.
- Extend my arguments.
- 2413.
Society is too harsh on illegal immigrants
For
- Before I go into my arguments, let me be clear that anyone who is coming to the US for the simple reason of doing crime are not who I am referring to. I am referring to the people who comer here to 'start over', or to get away from poverty. I don't believe you understood me…
- It is my pleasure!In response to the video, they would not have been in a high speed chase if they were accepted and given the job opportunities you and I are. "Next, drug cartels are given an all-access pass to America."I'll just say this. Drug dealing is a quick way to make a…
Against
- Seeing as to how this is the final round, and you brought up new argument, I will begin with rebuttals, then do the same. "Before I go into my arguments, let me be clear that anyone who is coming to the US for the simple reason of doing crime are not who I am referring to. I am…
- 1: You can say that, but that doesn't make it true. If they came here, and payed the money to become a citizen, that would not have happened. "I'll just say this. Drug dealing is a quick way to make a LOT of money. The problem is...it is illegal. For good reason. Let me back…
- 2414.
The United States is not a Christian nation
For
- I will organize my thoughts my numbering them as I read the first argument of Volk23, herein referred to simply as 'Con'. After rebutalling each of his arguments, I will then in turn expound on my own and offer evidence to support my claim in a manner which is clear, concise,…
- I contend that the United States is not and was never intended to be a Christian nation, nor was it founded upon Christian principles.
Against
- Pretty simple. .. .my opponent forfeited his round, so obviously all of my points are extended. The main voters here are clear: they are, 1) The US was founded on principles that are Christian; the idea that we are a nation "Under God" is clear evidence for that. Even if you…
- First, I will defend my case.... 1) I confused the Declaration of Independence with the Pledge; that is my fault (how I did, I don't know). However, my argument still retains, as the concept is not refuted....if we are "under God," we are then under his laws. He does point out…
- 2415.
The United States is a republic, not a democracy
For
- Vote aff.
- No further arguments.
Against
- As the American republic directly (or indirectly, when you take the electoral college into consideration) chooses who is responsible for passing legislature and who is involved in the executive and legislative branch, America is undoubtedly a Republican Democracy. It is the…
- 2416.
Gay service members should be allowed to serve openly
For
- Alright, I will be covering each contention in turn. Contention 1: My opponent does not argue that we are or are not silencing a minority thus I will restate that we are. Furthermore I go on to state that this is of no benefit to our military. In fact I have empirical examples…
- Alright, here goes. Note: I will be using the word "gay" as a catch all for LGBT for the soul purpose that I don't actually distinguish in my own mind or even care. DADT, short for "don't ask don't tell", is a public law put into effect in '93 by the Clinton administration. It…
Against
- I'll address the contentions similarly. I also urge voters to vote on the debate, not on your stance on the issue. Contention 1: Were the survey results directly from members of the military? If not, there could be unreported harassment. Contention 2: "when the military is…
- DISCLAIMER: The word "gay" is not meant to be offensive or used as a crude term for the people of said sexuality, but only for lack of a shorter and more accurate word. 1. If it is silencing a minority, it is only for the benefit of everyone in the military. If there are people…
- 2417.
Gun laws should be stricter rather than banning guns
For
- 1. "First of all, people are not so careless nowadays. They do not drop their guns. They don't leave as much evidence behind. It can be quite difficult to determine exactly where a person was shooting from, find all of the evidence, take it to the labs and go through the whole…
- My opponent states I have yet to respond to her arguments. I. " Guns kill people. How else would people be committing crimes and such? With guns, not only can people kill others, it makes it less dangerous for them [it's not as likely they will get caught, since these are…
Against
- My opponent, THE_OPINIONATOR, did not state any contentions in his first speech and so I forfeit mine.
- "People have been committing crimes without guns using things such as knives and different fighting methods. There are many ways to catch a shooter of a gun such as comparing shell casings, finger prints and firing residue. the shooter of a gun is almost always caught due to…
- 2418.
Gun ownership should be heavily restricted in modern society
For
- Again, criminals kill law-abiding citizens, not guns.
- The criminal is the one who commits the crime. What makes you think crime didn't exist before guns? Criminals used knives and other things. Look at areas where gun control are the most common. Crime is at an all-time high (Chicago, Detroit, Philly). If people have guns, the…
Against
- What is your opinion on guns and NRA in today's society?
- 2419.
Governments should grant amnesty to illegal immigrants
For
- I gave no specific referral to the United States. 'Amnesty' for illegal immigrants refers to all nations, including Middle Eastern nations. Nevertheless, I will try to cover all aspects of your argument. 'The US Code, Title 8, is very specific about what constitutes 'illegal…
- Hi, My debate will be focused on a recent issue, illegal immigrant amnesty. For this debate, I will be affirming. I will be arguing why we should grant illegal immigrants amnesty. The negating will answer why we should not. A few terms- 'THW'- This House would 'Amnesty' -…
Against
- Thank you for your rebuttal. "I gave no specific referral to the United States. 'Amnesty' for illegal immigrants refers to all nations, including Middle Eastern nations. " Since you spoke originally of current conversation, I assumed you were talking about the US. I cannot…
- The US Code, Title 8, is very specific about what constitutes 'illegal alien' and the laws concerning the hiring, aiding, housing, etc. of those who are here illegally. If for no other reason, the term 'illegal' should declare why those who are here without proper documentation…
- 2420.
America should go to war with Iran
For
- No, just Iran, the onyl country on your list that borders both Afgan and Iraq, the countries im trying to say we need to calm down.
- No, just that Iran in a big supplier. So that if we take them ou we take a large chunk out of their suplies and men.
Against
- Libya is the biggest supplier of suicide bombers, so are you saying we need to attack the lage suppliers who happen to be mostly large counries like Iran, Libya, China, and Russia?
- Even if by some mmiricale we did take over Iran, do you honestly tink Iran is the only supplier of arms to the terrorists? In Newsweek they had an article a few months ago on all the different countries suppling arms and men to the terrorists. Iran was one in about 20. Are you…
- 2421.
US drone strikes in Afghanistan under Obama caused civilian deaths
For
- " He begins his argument with a contradiction: He is for the total annihilation of countries that harbor terrorists, yet he is against anything Obama does " What my personal beliefs are or what I would do is irrelevant. What is relevant is what Bush did in regard to snuffing…
- I would like to state first and foremost that I am for the total and complete annihilation of the countries that harbor terrorists. Anything that Obama may do as a leader in the killing of terrorists will be a complete failure. He will kill more civilians than terrorists. He…
Against
- My opponent's entire argument is based on a chip on his shoulder, and a grudge he is holding against what he terms "the Democratic party", and "their" criticism of Bush. Indeed there were many members of the Democratic party who criticized Bush's handling of the war, but there…
- My opponent seems to be making a hodgepodge of judgments and assessments based on pure emotion, and not fact. He begins his argument with a contradiction: He is for the total annihilation of countries that harbor terrorists, yet he is against anything Obama does to bring…
- 2422.
Private gun ownership should be prohibited
For
- My opinions are to substantiated. They are based off of my past experiences with society since the legalization of guns. My refutations have not failed to prove my contentions. My opponent still contends that guns aid a society when I have proven otherwise. Criminals can"t…
- My opponent seems to believe my statements are "absurd" and lacking source, yet he fails to realize the very strength of opinions. Contention 1: Less Guns, Less CrimeMy opponent seems to believe that past occurrences will dictate the future, yet he has failed to adhere to our…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited the last round and did not defend his points so I take it that I have refutted his claims and I have defended my own. My contentions still stand, and I would like to thank those who have read this debate. Vote accordingly.
- My opponent still makes claims without warrants, and has based his case on everything but facts.He states that we have not always had the right to keep and bear arms however, the second amendment was written as part of the Constitution's Bill of Rights in 1791 [1]. Even before,…
- 2423.
Military benefits create an incentive for prolonged war
For
- I'm sorry, I am also against them.. sorry for the confusion.. I Would enjoy someone outlining why the benefits of such benefits would promote peace instead of falseflag deception from an evolutionary standpoint
- So do they?
Against
- oh sorry you asked "So do they?" I thought you wanted to know.
- yes i think so
- 2424.
Universal health care would harm America
For
- I meant that you oughtn't post a third debate. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
- Extend all my points.
Against
- You sent me a message saying that you were "quite done with the topic" so that is why i hadn't posted any arguments.
- .. .. .. .. . Anyway, "This will result in the destruction of the health insurance industry. " These are not my words, they are yours. I didn't say that the healthcare industry would collapse, I said that It would lead America into a deeper recession. Please don't pull things…
- 2425.
Barack Obama has been an exceptional president
For
- Well the way you typed your argument topic it sounded like you were for Obama. I guess we see eye to eye that Obama plain old sucks as a president!
- here are my 50 reasons why he sucks....let me know if you need more i have plenty! 1) When Democrat Nancy Pelosi questioned the patriotism of Americans who honestly and intelligently opposed the tenets of Obama Care by calling them un-American, Obama was silent. 2) When…
Against
- And, once again, vote for me.
- Vote for me.
- 2426.
The words 'under God' should be removed from the US Pledge of Allegiance
For
- To all those voters out there: the previous was Con's argument. Four sentences. The fact is, saying under God or god is certainly not the end of the world. By asking this question, he immediately skips the initial discussion from "should it be allowed to exist in the pledge" to…
- Firstly, "Under God" is in reference to the Christian religion. What else, I ask you, would it be reference to? And if you say it's a metaphor, than you are agreeing that we should change the pledge to "under science" or "under Allah". Why does there even need to be a metaphor…
Against
- You speak as if its the end of world and your life is so over because some words that were add to the pledge by a bunch of people who are probably more than likely dead in the ground. Mankind has been changing and evolving for centuries and two little words 'under God' two…
- How is saying under God or god the end of the world? Once again you haven't proved that those two words are Christian related or indoctrination of people who say them. It's just words that have meaning to whoever is saying the pledge. I await your response.
- 2427.
The United States should militarily intervene against Mexican drug cartels
For
- Thank you for another very well organized and thought out rebuttal. I now will provide my response: Con points out from my last round, "He draws a really good example regarding prohibition, however it is turned to my side. Consider that since alcohol is now legal the black…
- Con has refuted as well as offered counter-plans; however, they will not stop the drug cartel as I will explain: "Counterplan One: Legalize drugs Advantage one: Crime related to the drug trade goes away. This is obvious..if we legalize drugs there will be no drug war to fight.…
Against
- no no
- Thanks Pro. I'll do rebuttal now, mostly clearing up statements made in this round.My Opponent argues that moonshine is still bootlegged. I have a few responses.--> I'll take your word for it, but the impact is obviously much less now than in the past.--> Most moonshiners…
- 2428.
Religion and politics should never be combined
For
- Counter Arguments: Religious Politicans for the Religious I find this argument to be valid under certain circumstances. Firstly, you are right; in a Democratic society, the most popular opinion/person SHOULD win. However, this is not always the right (fair, equal, civil)…
- I'm pretty excited about this topic as well. I find the issue interesting, both sides of it, that is. Good luck. For starters, as I mentioned, "one's religious beliefs or values shouldn't have anything to do with their desicions as a politician." In my opinion, politics and…
Against
- Extend my arguments.
- Religious Politicans for the Religious "I find this argument to be valid under certain circumstances." Then this should be enough for a Con win, seeing as the resolution states that religion and politics should -never- be combined and I have made a case for religion and…
- 2429.
Donald Trump should be the next president
For
- Although you did not get a chance to respond. I have decided to post a few quotes DIRECTLY from Donald Trump. Trump stated, during his 2016 presidential announcement speech, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending the best, they're not sending you, they're sending…
- Thank you for responding to my post. I see where you are coming from and I respect you opinion. I do have a few questions though. You seem to be saying a lot of broad things about Donald Trump, and I was wondering if you would be able to directly confirm these things with some…
Against
- Also, he has been supportive of Katie Hopkins, one of the most despicable people on the planet. I'd rather not have a president who endorses someone who says they're against children beings named after a location after having named their own child "India." He also bragged about…
- Did Donald Trump not call all Mexicans rapists? "They're rapists." That's what he said. Why would this man make a good president? Moreover, he made fun of a disabled person via a pretty insulting impression (which I recall involved making his hands limp, his arms move funny,…
- 2430.
Barack Obama was a better-than-average president
For
- I am giving my opponent a chance to express their round 2 arguments, as stated in the comments.
- ! I am definitely not a debate master like some people on here, but this should be interesting and fun. Now, just for the sake of complete clarity, I will state my purpose and what I will (try to) prove. Saying that Obama sucks is saying that he barely did anything right, and…
Against
- Misty, I am sad that you were unable to provide a response or defense to my argument, but I will pursue to respond, in short (very), to your argument for the sake of validating my own position. In your argument, you brought three issues that you believe Obama has handled quite…
- In an effort to maintain a fair and equal debate, I will forgo this round, and we will (should) move directly into rebuttals in the final round. See comments.
- 2431.
Gun ownership is an absolute right that should not be regulated
For
- No, those sources were not there in round 2, you came up with them now, go see round 2. Also, even if you could prove that Ronald Reagan said that, it is irrelevant, just because Reagan thought something doesn't mean that I have to, or that he is necessarily right. It's like if…
- No, you did not cite any sources, besides, even if you did, your source needs to provide a place and time where Reagan said that. In response to your first argument, you assume that it is the government's job to decide what rights the people should have, and that the government…
Against
- Wow... simply just.. wow. I'll make this easy for you. First, go to round two of my debate. Next, scroll down to the bottom where it says "Sources:". Guess what? My sources for my round 2 are there. Who knew? I would like to advise the voters to not pay attention to my…
- First of all, I would like to state that my opponent is completely ignorant in looking at my sources. I have shown a plethora of sources, yet my opponent somehow believes that I haven't put down any at all. So, seeing that my opponent is completly lazy when it comes to simply…
- 2432.
Church and state should be separated
For
- Well at this point im bewildered, I think you chose the wrong side. But yeah I guess i sorta win by default since you really haven't answered much Whatever
- So yeah i guess he concedes to the point which since thats the case vote neg because of this and the reasons posted above
Against
- sorry i was unaware of time allocated for this event and i cannot make anyfurther point as you have made none to show your favor and it would seem you joined this debate for the sake of it and share no interest if this is not true please prove me wrong!
- As i have commented on earlier threads government especially in the united states is supposedly written by the people for the people and therefore having church and state unified takes away this Right granted by the united states Constitution as the majority maybe Christian but…
- 2433.
Israel will not suffer a nuclear attack within twenty years
For
- I have greatly enjoyed this, my first debate. I thank my opponent for his civility and his heart-felt arguments. He clearly believes in his arguments very strongly, unfortunately this belief seems to run so deep that he will not let details such as evidence or logic get in…
- I am concerned that what began as an interesting and intelligent debate is running the risk of becoming boring and repetitive as my opponent seems to be arguing in circles. Additionally as some of the rounds have been quite lengthy I hope that voters will take the time to read…
Against
- [quote]All of this is conjecture, not backed up by evidence, yet presented by my opponent as fact.[/quote] I have presented a ton of evidence, whether or not you choose to accept it is a different thing. [quote]"If and when Iran does have 3,000 centrifuges operating smoothly,…
- Hi there, I'm back. Thanks for the fast response. Before I respond to your arguments, I will show you another possibility of what is possible. A terrorist attack. There have been about 200 documented cases of a person buying material for a nuclear weapon from the black market.…
- 2434.
War is never worth its costs
For
- Ah, you found a rebuttal song. Very nice. Well, what exactly was it that Tommy achieved by beating up the Gatlin boys? Did he take the rape back magically? Did the boys feel bad about what they did? Did he prove he was a man? No, he accomplished none of these things, all he did…
- Well thank you for that compliment. I must agree with Logical-Master, and I too would have been quite amused if you had found a rebuttal song. But back on subject. On Necessity: While I cannot refute that wars have served a purpose, I have to disagree that that makes them…
Against
- When Tommy took on the Gatlin boys, it is true that he could not undo the rape, nor could he instill guilt in people of such a brutish nature. However, he did show much more than the fact that he has the ability to punch people. He showed that he would no longer allow himself…
- Coward Of The County by Kenny Rogers Everyone considered him the coward of the county. He'd never stood one single time to prove the county wrong. His mama named him Tommy, the folks just called him yellow, But something always told me they were reading Tommy wrong. He was only…
- 2435.
The US remains in a Cold War-like standoff with communist states
For
- I agree, there is definite ambiguity in the topic that I have created; however, that does not mean it can't be defended. The term "communist" does not include Russia anymore as the Soviet Union had already dissolved after the Cold War. So, the last standing communist nations…
- New to debate system but would like to start by saying good luck to the opponent. The US has not dug up the roots of the old Cold War tensions in the 20th century. Countries, like Russia, are becoming stronger off of militaristic goals and ideals. It's time for the US to be on…
Against
- I didn't say that there was ambiguity; it seems fairly clear to me, but I wanted to define my terms first (I'm new.) "the communist nations" definitely includes Vietnam, Laos and Cuba. I think that saying that the US is in a Cold-War like standoff with these nations is clearly…
- First of all, I will quote the title of this debate I have accepted; "The US is still at a Cold War-like Standoff with the Communist nations." Notably, these communist nations include China, North Korea, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. Laos has never really been the focus of any…
- 2436.
Media should publish details of terrorist attacks
For
- extend...............
- extend....
Against
- So I'm doing a debate with my school and the model is that this house would not publish acts of terror, I am a proposing this model and personally I feel that by publishing acts of terror it is causing an unnecessary uproar and panic in society, I also feel like it is shining a…
- 2437.
Religion should play no role in lawmaking
For
- I'm afraid you have not responded to any of my requests to answer which religions law is right or should be introduced and the issues around existing religious claims against such things as homosexuality and slavery. I still do not see how the first 4 items on the 10…
- Firstly thank you for accepting my first debate, however secondly the claim that there would be no morals without religion is outrageous, If you were to base the law on the 10 commandments, while some are morally obvious, and I say obvious because humans have a natural pack…
Against
- Once again my opponent refuses to accept my valid arguments. The first few items in the Ten Commandments are noted in respect to Christianity and its morals, not law per se. As I have aforementioned, morality has paved the way for law, as they constitute the same fundamental…
- Good points, but allow me to continue. You claimed in your aforementioned arguments that the first six items on the Ten Commandments have no direct correlation to morality. But this is a false claim. I'd like to clarify the etymology of morals: Moral: concerned with the…
- 2438.
The Pledge of Allegiance should say 'under government' instead of 'under God'
For
- To be honest, I am not a big fan of pledging allegiance to any political entity, including the United States of America, especially when so many things have changed in America since its founding. The support of abortion on demand, the redefinition of the family and the support…
- We will not change it. I accept the challenge and will prove you wrong.
Against
- I never said we would change it.You need to convince me and others why it is inappropriate to change it to " under government".Since over half of Americans are now dependent on government. There are probably hundreds of bureaucracies that feed the freeloader class.From…
- I think that half the folks should say it this way. Those who have given government control of their lives freely. The rest of us are comfortable leaving it just as it is. Maybe someone would say it even differently?
- 2439.
Peaceful diplomacy is better than war for independent governments
For
- Going back to what I stated in my last argument I still find that an independent government would be beneficial to this nation because we need something and someone that would do what they promise . Next Please. I find that the Independent Party would do just that . Also I am…
- The independent party stands for freedom and peace . I am strongly in favor of peace and freedom. That is just an opinion . Next please Peace and freedom are just two of the things that the independent party stands for . I think that this world should stand up and fight for…
Against
- my dear i can understand which u r like to explian but if we think practically just like me sometimes u need to do self defence which is not at all war.sometimes for the sake of peace and freedom u have to take some crucial actions.
- In this presenrt scenario it is quite difficult to make a govt with peace,coz of some of parties or i can say supported by some countries.in the path of making independent government war is always there which we have to accept and fight.
- 2440.
The word God should be removed from government symbols and pledges
For
- Well you may think "that children now days do not learn who he really is except in the church and Bible" but I might think that children don't really learn who they are unless they pray to a Banana. That is your opinion.It is your right to have your opinion as it is my right to…
- there should not be any mentioning of the word god when it comes to government. this is not one nation under god becaue i do not believe in god yet i am apart of this nation that i was born in. i herd that originally there was never any mentioning of god and that it was placed…
Against
- I here by find that the word god should be placed on the dollar bill and in the schools and the Pledge of Allegience as a tool of learning I think that children now days do not learn who he really is except in the church and Bible. I find that most American people when asked if…
- In conclusion I still fail to see your logic in taking the word god out of everything pertaining to the governnent and the dollar bill. You being Atheist has no bearing to why we have the word god on the dollar bill.If it is just a word why should it offend you if it is on the…
- 2441.
Feminism is fundamentally about gender equality, not misandry
For
- I don't have much to say, as my opponent has forfeited this round, but I would like to correct an error that I made in Round 3. I said, and I quote, "Misogynists say, 'Wow, that man claims to have been raped? That must be false, as that would make him a coward, which only men…
- Even though my opponent has forfeited this round, I would like to make another point about the sexism against women that exists in society. In society, it is considered acceptable for men to show their nipples, but not for women. This is a blatant double standard. Some people…
Against
- Still all rights should be upheld all the time at all times
- Equal rights for all should be upheld over the right of a few.
- 2442.
The United States should avoid wars against ideas and focus on domestic issues
For
- If you decide to vote, then cast all your points to him, for showing his grace and integrity.
- I'm sorry, that due to a family emergency I have not been able to post my argument. I would like to re-open this debate again, specifically to my current opponent. Since it would not be fair to offer a rebuttal in this round, due to Con not being able to rebut, I forfeit this…
Against
- This debate was rather short lived. I don't know about Pro, but personally I care very much about my win percentage and stuff like that. No one vote for either side as this would not be fair and detrimental for the opponent, depending on who you vote for. We will re do this…
- I have spoken to the Instigator and we have agreed to redo this debate. No need to vote.
- 2443.
The war in Afghanistan was a mistake
For
- You are correct. I stand corrected but I will touch on that later. I was confused because it is the DDO custom to do the [_] and then the source. I am sorry for that misunderstanding. Again, I will respond to this at the end. //With regard to my opponents quotes from Afghan…
- //I find it interesting that my opponent chose to base his argument around the impact it has on only the USA, when there are other allies dying over there too. I find this direction of argument a bit selfish, and as such I shall look at the wider picture of Afghanistan…
Against
- I shall repeat those facts as they are still being ignored (sources in Round One): •54% of Afghans say they are more prosperous now than in 2001. •Those without access to electricity form only 33% of the population, which is an improvement on the previous 42%. •In 2000 only 35%…
- My opponents did not seem to even read my sources as he goes on to state (regarding my facts list at the end of Round One) "there is no evidence to suggest this was due to the war". If they looked closely they will see one of the sources was the government of Australia, who is…
- 2444.
War is a continuation of politics by other means
For
- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. " This is the definition of war in which Carl von Clausewitz presented in his book Vom Krieg, "On War". On War is considered the standard text to military doctrine; and is still required reading in almost every military…
- I will take it from my opponent's comment that I am lost in the 'philosophy' of why humans go to war; that my opponent has neither ever seen a war; nor seen a military conduct themselves in battle. As a soldier in the Canadian Forces; I am more than awe of why nations go to…
Against
- I will point out for the acceptance piece of this round that my opponent has not defined and clarified certain key aspects of the debate. I will proceed to do so. My opponent is clearly not restricting his definition to the standard definition of politics. (the art or science…
- I wish to cite for everyone what clearly my opponent stated was my responsibilities. In his first round he stated my burden of proof was: "Con: will attempt to prove that wars have been waged over differing circumstances; and not solely a political agenda. " With my one round…
- 2445.
Middle Eastern terrorists are created by America
For
- These practices are the ones every world power has used throughout history. The Romans suppurted less powerful Germanic tribes to fight unified ones. The French supported Native Americans when fighting the British over North America. Its a common sense practice of dominant…
- So what happens is because the middle eastern countries' armies cannot get too big without america getting alarmed, armies must come together in the form of outlaw terrorist organizations. This way, the countries aren't responsible for the conduct of would-be soldiers. It's…
Against
- To say Middle Eastern terrorists are created by America is like saying that it's a murder victim's fault that they were murdered. That's a very rash conclusion to come to, and insults everything that the United States has fought to protect. How is it exactly that you believe…
- 2446.
One cannot be both a libertarian and a Democrat
For
- Goodbye
- And the saga continues.
Against
- Alright! First debate on the site! So excited. Okay, before I begin: I am not from US, so I cannot actually be a Democrat per se. But I am a avid follower of US politics, and for the sake of this debate, I will argue that it is possible to left of centre on the political…
- 2447.
Democrats are better than Republicans overall
For
- If you are a WOMAN you should vote DEMOCRAT if you are BLACK you should definitely vote DEMOCRAT if you are LGBT you should DEFINITELY vote DEMOCRAT if you are a STUDENT you should DEFINITELY vote DEMOCRAT if you are a SENIOR you should DEFINITELY vote DEMOCRAT, in fact the…
- Republicans a racist, homophobic, sexist, elitist, end of story
Against
- Okay. .. In this speech I'm just going to explain what has happened so far in this debate, as my opponent hasn't refuted my argument nor responded to my refutations. EXPLANATION OF THIS DEBATESo really what this debate comes down to is the "every" in the resolution - as I…
- I am assuming that I can put arguments in round 1 as there are no rules against it, so here we go. OVERVIEW/RESOLUTIONAL ANALYSISThere are a couple things I have noticed in this resolution that I would like to point out and explain. First of all, the wording of the resolution…
- 2448.
The United States should not retreat from the war on terror
For
- Several logical fallacies immediately stand out in my opponent's argument. First, the war on terror is generally accepted as the war on terrorism, not on general fear. A terrorist is one who uses violence and/or threats to intimidate/kill citizens of the attacked nation. Al…
- The war on terror is a much needed defense of American safety and those who advise retreating are advocating a policy that would ensure that our servicemen and women would have died in vain. The Taliban, etc. would simply retake the country, soon reverting it to its former…
Against
- Forfeit please vote for my side thank you
- Ok so i must argue that we should retreat? well then i will seeing how the war on terror has done nothing and leaving will do nothing iraq is over and already has established their government and will no turn back to the enemy. Secondly I would argue that the war on terror as i…
- 2449.
Barack Obama was a better president than George W. Bush
For
- Okay you win obama is worse but they both are treble presidents bush is just better then obama http://youtu.be... http://youtu.be... http://youtu.be... http://youtu.be...
- Before George W. bush i will admit the country was on a very slight slope into recession , but george bush made the slight slope a free fall. When george bush took office in the 90's many thought do to the internet improve the economy. Productivity gains were up 1.5% During…
Against
- Thanks for the debate, my victory is clear.
- George bush was a grateful patriot who made the best decisions he could. Obama is a ungrateful man who believes this nation has failed and needs reform. Which is completely untrue. Man was he grateful to G.W. Bush This shows he well he's handled other countries, that want to…
- 2450.
Illegal immigrants should be deported
For
- I surrender, I changed my mind on the illegal immigrants thing, they help more than hurt, you win by default, and I'm sorry that you typed all of that for nothing.
- https://www.politico.com... you cannot ignore the fact that it makes innocent civilians poorer, and plus, the illeageals should not be pitied, they broke the law! if they wanted to be in America, but instead of waiting, they ran across the border, it also isn't helping that…
Against
- For this debate I shall be dividing up the illegal immigration arguments up into 3 seperate areas, mos tof my opponent's arguments fall under C1, but the rest are refuted in these. Sorry if it makes any rebuttals a bit hard to navigate, but, let us begin. Economic FactorsIn…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?