Politics Debate Topics for Students — page 17
2,667 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 801.
The United States should fix domestic problems before helping other countries
For
- I, Pro, will be arguing that the US needs to step out of the global spotlight and focus on its own people before giving aid to other countries. Con will be arguing that the US's support on the global stage is necessary and by pulling out troops and ceasing financial aid will be…
Against
- Extend
- Extend
- 802.
Flag burning during protests is wrong
For
- You have my sincere apologies aaltobartok. I did not intend my title of the debate topic to be offensive in any way, next time I will be sure to use the topic to title the debate instead of my voiced opinion. Now to the matter at hand, "No disrespect should be shown to the flag…
- I cannot see how someone could tolerate the burning of a United States flag during a protest. I think it should be treason. yes, we have freedom to gather and protest. Yes, we have freedom of speech. Yes, we have the freedom to do whatever the heck else we want, but this is…
Against
- It's etiquette against the Constitution. The Constitution wins. That etiquette was created for proper respect of the flag by those wishing to respect it, and for those wishing to respect it. Forcing citizens to respect symbols of government forces them to respect the government…
- Please vote on this debate on the debating, not on your point of view on the topic. The United States Constitution clearly states the following: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the…
- 803.
Atomic bombs should never be used in war
For
- you claimed that the tens of thousands of lives where OK because there were chemical factories in japan the majority of the people in those cities had no part in the war what so ever. you also said that i thought we got pleasure out of cruelty, i only meant the 3rd definition.…
- atomic bombs are awful sadistic weapons of mass destruction that have no place in this great world that has been given to us. they do gruesome things and prevent any innocent civilians from escaping total annihilation.
Against
- Seeing as my opponent has forfeited his chance to argue back, I'll simply restate my points for this round.
- I will begin my argument by addressing the specific language you have used in the outlining of this challenge and rebutting it as overly emotional and entirely lacking in sufficient analysis to be considered an appropriate proposal for a debate. Secondly, I will back up my…
- 804.
NATO membership should be extended to Georgia and Ukraine
For
- Expansion is in the interests of NATO
- There is a strong precedent for expansion
Against
- NATO is divided on how to deal with Georgia
- The West needs to deal with Russia
- 805.
Elected officials should earn only minimum wage
For
- It's fine. This'll just be a shorter argument. I'll hit each of your contentions. 1.) There will always be people who want to be in office. Teaching jobs don't pay well, but there are still kids that want to be teachers. If anything, this will help us get a better pool of only…
- First, I extend the idea that people who say that minimum wage is enopugh to live off of should live off of it. Now I'll address onne of the problems commonly associated with raising minimum wage and show why it doesn't apply: inflation. The problem is that when we raise wages,…
Against
- I'll hit each of your contentions as well. 1.) Teaching jobs pay better than minimum wage. Sure there are gunna be a few people who will take the job, but those most qualified are going to find better paying jobs. No one wants to go to college for at least 4 years to get payed…
- First, I'd like to apologize for bailing on you the last round. I was visiting my fianc� for a week and didn't have time. Poor judgment in thinking I could make time for debate.org…lol Now, on to your points. I can definitely understand where you're coming from and the idea…
- 806.
The Council on Foreign Relations has too much influence over US foreign policy
For
- Now Bee, listen, there's organization which is always appreciated… and then there's this spreading out thing that you do which makes something that should be 1 page into 3. Lol, I implore you to see that there is a difference. =P Do Founders Really Matter: My opponent has…
- --Background/Points:-- Definition of Marxism: The political and economic philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under…
Against
- RE:sponse mode. ======== RE: Marxism ======== Frankly, it matters not what the founder believed in. The truth is that policy recommendations from the CFR do not reflect a Marxist approach to politics. When the founder died, whatever he wanted to do through the organization died…
- First I'll respond to my opponent's opening arguments, then I'll make my own case if necessary. ======== Background / Points: ======== My opponent explains the origins of the organization. Few actual points here, though there is an unspoken point about the Marxist views of the…
- 807.
Naturalized immigrants should be allowed to become US president
For
- Here we go.... If your like most Americans, you probably have heard the requirements of being president. They are; Must be at least 35 years of age, must have lived in this country for at least 18 years, and you must be a natural born citizen. When our founding fathers created…
- If someone will help, I have to do this same debate tomarrow in class and I need some practice!
Against
- Actually, George Washington was born in Virginia Colony, one of the original 13 colonies. (1) By that statement alone, he is not an immigrant. Also, none of the founding fathers could have been immigrants because at the time there was no America, only the American colonies. The…
- I will be rebutting his arguments with the belief that immigrants should not be allowed to become president.
- 808.
Organized political lobbying is a just check on US government
For
- Hello guys, I am radicalguy44 and I will prove in this debate that jury nullification actually is a good and just check on government. I would like for this to be an LD debate, where value and criterias are used, and burdens are also upheld. To my opponent, good luck my friend!…
- Sorry for forfeiting, I haven't had much time. I'll start by attacking 1) "The argument that he makes here is that jury nullification isn't fair, makes mistakes very often, and isn't a check on government. It seems as if Pro has switched his position, and is now attacking jury…
Against
- *Preface* I'm sorry if it seems like I'm being a bit lazy with this last Round; but, for whatever reason, it seems that my motivation to put all of my effort into this debate has mysteriously left me. Now, considering that Pro hasn't exactly followed the flow of the arguments,…
- Extend from Round 2.
- 809.
Democracy can succeed in large, diverse populations
For
- Hi every one i believe that democracy in INDIA is magic ,it looks like this fellow is mad ,but its true in my point of view.Because we have seen countries with no diversity are getting bifurcated ,but INDIA being a country with different religions and different languages ,still…
Against
- vin
- EXTEND
- 810.
Civil disobedience is appropriate in the fight for justice
For
- I will let my oppenent choose his/her arguments first. I would like to see why they think that CD is not appropriate.
Against
- Blah Blah Taking Up space man this stinks i wish the guy would respond to something blah blah almost there, there
- 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum 100 word minimum
- 811.
Fox News is an unreliable news source
For
- Tell me how are FOX news viewers supposed to interpret a debate that fox showed of Obama, only they used an Obama impersonator to substitute for Obama? http://elections.americablog.com... How are viewers supposed to interpret Fox news editing a discussion with John Stewart?…
- --I will mean political propaganda --by spreads I mean broadcasts it --By Fox news I mean its shows. There have been over 5 research studies that show that the simple act of watching fox news makes one more misinformed and ignorant. I will post each one.…
Against
- Good points. Again I must reinstate that fact that it is what the people who watch the shows see in the reoprting that determines the reliability of a news source. News is bound for altercations, as it is simply what it appears to be, new. If all news was accurate there would…
- There have been over 5 research studies that show that the simple act of watching fox news makes one more misinformed and ignorant. I will post each one. Here is the problem with your post. One cannot assume that it is FOX that is causing these statistics to exist in its…
- 812.
The US Constitution should be amended to let naturalized citizens run for president
For
- Brenavia builds his argumentation against allowing naturalized citizens of the United States to become eligible to run for the office of President on the assumption that loyalty to one country is driven by the place of birth. I believe this is a fallacious and discriminatory…
- Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as President of the United States: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall…
Against
- First off, you're claiming that I am making a discriminatory assumption. Not only is this flase, but I believe your position is biased. If you truly believe that naturalized citizens should be able to run for President, fine, but dont call me discriminatory. Secondly, when poll…
- I see where your coming from. This sounds like a good idea, to let all citizens of America have the ability to become President, but there are reason why the President cannot be a naturalized citizen. Contention 1: Loyalty The Natural Opinion Research Center of the University…
- 813.
Drone warfare is an effective way to achieve military goals
For
- Before we start I would like to define Drone warfare as: a pilot less air or ground vehicle equipped for military purposes being for either offensive, defensive or recon uses. Assuming that this definition is acceptable I would like my opponent whom ever that ends up being to…
- Im very sorry, but somthing has come up and i wont be able to do this debate.
Against
- Pro never responded to my query in the comments section, so I ask him to do so in his R2. Essentially, we can keep the resolution as-is, or adjust it to the pros and cons of Drone Warfare in general, and not just about whether they complete military goals. This is a better…
- Derp.
- 814.
Legislatures should use direct representation
For
- Well, ..., 1Alyssa appears to have conceded the argument as best as I can tell. At the very least, 1Alyssa has not contested My rebuttal. So, ..., yeah.
- [As noted in the 'comments' section, I apologize if the formatting of My previous argument appears odd; it did not look this way when I typed it up.]1Alyssa, having forfeited the previous round, I take it You are conceding the points I raise.
Against
- I acknowledge my opponent"s knowledge in the subject matter. Point 1: I acknowledge my opponent"s point. Point 2: Regarding my opponent"s rebuttal to point 2, I believe he may have missed my original intention. According to the definitions he drew for direct representation,…
- While direct representation may seem like an ideal form of democracy, it has its fundamental flaws. 1. It will involve more procedures and slow down the entire decision-making progress. The Congress is already inefficient as it is, further procedure that will involve careful…
- 815.
Failed states pose a greater threat to the United States than stable nations
For
- __________ Observations __________ You stated: "I would like to begin by attack(ing) my opponent's case and then rebuilding mine. In the first two rounds my opponent has said many things that prove that stable nations are greater threat to the United States than failed nations.…
- Thank you and Sorry for the Late Post, Life stuff. I'll add an Observations topic and rename Negations to Contentions. -Observations- Just Noticed Your definition of Threat is wrong, See mine: An act of coercion wherein a negative consequence is proposed to elicit response. All…
Against
- I would like to begin by attack my opponent's case and then rebuilding mine. In the first two rounds my opponent has said many things that prove that stable nations are greater threat to the United States than failed nations. Here they are: 1. " Iran as a government dares not…
- Here is a list of the top ten failed nations: 1. Somalia 2. Zimbabwe 3. Sudan 4. Chad 5. DRC 6. Iraq 7. Afghanistan 8. Central African Republic 9. Guinea 10. Pakistan First I would like to begin by rebuilding my own case and then attacking my opponents case. Contention 1: My…
- 816.
France should withdraw from Mali
For
- My opponent can accept or go first.
- I apologize to my opponent for not being able to participate in this debate, and there was a lot of stuff going on that prevented me from doing so. I would like to speak to my opponent about tieing this debate, and challenging him to a rematch later. Does that sound good Gotleib?
Against
- I accept
- Surely, anyone who is on this debate count it as a tie.
- 817.
The Electoral College misrepresents the will of voters
For
- The electoral college is not representative of America that was the point of this debate :L
- I would like to refer my opponent to the 2000 general election. Even though the democrat (and possible communist) Al Gore received more vote than his opponent the Republican (and devout christian) George W. Bush he lost the election because because George W. Bush had won more…
Against
- My opponent's final statement was this: "The electoral college is not representative of America that was the point of this debate" Yes, I agree. This was my opponent's point of the debate. However, he has failed to uphold that resolution. He has provided no evidence showing…
- My opponent is attempting to argue something completely absurd. The resolution clearly states that we are discussing the following issue: "The Electoral College is Misrepresentative" I am arguing on the CON side, the electoral college is *not* misrepresentative of the current…
- 818.
The US should deploy ground forces to fight ISIS
For
- Okay, ground force includes all troops, vehicles and weapons on the ground, such as infantry, tanks, humvees, miniguns, turrets, artillery etc. ISIS' base can only be pierced through ground force as the other two methods of attack are air and the navy. A complete air raid can't…
- As in the instructions for this debate, I will now waive this round. Good debate!
Against
- Thank you for accepting quickly, here is my case. Framework We need to view this debate through the effectiveness of whether putting in a ground force down to fight ISIS will be viable or not. If the con can prove that the plan is not viable or effective, then the judge should…
- Rules1. No forfeiture2. No kritiks3. Comment before accepting the debate4. No ad-hominem attacksRound StructureR1: Constructive for proR2: RebuttalR3: Rebuttal, pro final focusR4: Final Focus, pro waives
- 819.
The United States should unilaterally disarm its nuclear arsenal
For
- Hello, and thank you for posting your arguments. I'll take this time to reconstruct my own points when necessary and deconstruct your arguments in preparation for the rebuttal rounds.To all who vote on this debate, let me remind you that I set forth very specific and…
- Looking forward to a fantastic first experience for the both of us. I see that many of you have already made up your minds in the comment section, but please refrain from deciding the winner before the debate occurs and judge solely on the outcome of this debate and the clash…
Against
- To begin my constructive argument... 1. "Nuclear Deterrence" As a Superpower, it is important to have better weapons than all other nations on Earth (hence the 682 billion dollar budget). Nuclear weapons are the most powerful weapons mankind has created or fielded in history.…
- Hello! This too is my first debate, and might I say, this is an excellent topic for a debate. I accept!
- 820.
The UK should remain in the Customs Union
For
- I'm glad to hear that you have come to the conclusion that we cannot judge what people actually want over the customs union. My original point was that there is diversity of opinion and that there is no mandate to take us out. That doesn't mean that there is a mandate to stay…
- Thanks for your response. To clarify my stance:I think it was an error in your typing but you said that: "You believe that since the referendum was simply on whether or not Britain should leave the customs union". Just to clarify, I said that the referendum was only about…
Against
- I would like to start my rebuttal by thanking you for that opening correct; the line should have read "You believe that since the referendum was simply on whether or not Britain should leave the EU". That out of the way, the reason I posted why I thought it was more likely for…
- I will start off by summarising your main points, to make sure that I am not debating a straw man. Feel free to correct me on any or all points. You believe that since the referendum was simply on whether or not Britain should leave the customs union, it is therefore incorrect…
- 821.
Unilateral US military force is justified to stop nuclear proliferation
For
- I would like to first to over my opponents arguments and then my own if necessary. My opponent's first point seemed to just talk about why its a bad idea, but the question is: do we have good reasons to (Justification)? Nuclear proliferation is one of our largest threats to our…
- We are all aware that there is a McDonalds in about every city in the world. Imagine if for every other one, there was a nuclear weapon in the world. According to McDonalds, that would be a lie. There are actually even MORE nuclear weapons than that. I stand in firm affirmation…
Against
- In conclusion, unilateral military force by the United States for the purposes of nuclear non-proliferation are unjust, because it has never been shown to work historically, unilateral actions of the U.S. have been historically against the will of the people, and it is highly…
- "My opponent's first point seemed to just talk about why its a bad idea, but the question is: do we have good reasons to (Justification)? Nuclear proliferation is one of our largest threats to our security today which is in itself a perfectly good reason to use unilateral…
- 822.
Canada is not a true democracy
For
- You are wanting to debate if Canada is a dictatorship; but the debate is that Canada is not a Democracy, by the legal definition, which requires free sovereign people. You have not posted any document that States when the people became free from colonial rule; or when the…
- What did the free sovereign people do in 1949 as reported in hansard to become a democracy. Did you vote in a referendum in 1942 to adopt a constitution as created by the people of Canada or was it just a government bill. Their is nothing in hansard record showing the people of…
Against
- Ladies and gentleman, my opponent has absolutely failed to prove that Canada is not a democracy. He criticizes me for using the word 'dictatorship', yet he was the first to use it. His argument rests solely on technicalities and conspiracy theories (I sincerely doubt Canada is…
- The answer to this is simple, clear-cut and factual; Canada was a dominion; a subsidy of the British Empire, before 1949 for all practical purposes. While Canada had a fairly large clout in terms of its own fate, England still had the final say. After 1949, Canada was given…
- 823.
The United States is a nation in decline
For
- Yeah, well I think the arguments (or lack thereof) speak for themselves. I urge you to consider that my contentions have been untouched, and therefore deserve the votes. I do appreciate the honesty though, Thoreau.
- Alright. .. Well, I guess that's it then. I have to post at least 100 characters though, so I'll just keep talking for a bit.
Against
- It's true that I haven't made any arguments, but take my assurances, this was all due to a lack of time. I certainly wouldn't hold it against anyone if I lost, but I really do feel that this debate was a simple judgement error on my part, which shouldn't cause a match loss…
- That is that, indeed. Once again, I apologize for the waste of time. 100 characters... Vote Con! Just kidding. You probably shouldn't vote at all. (Yes, I still don't want the match loss on my record...)
- 824.
Citizens should have the right to bear arms
For
- I am a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment and right to bare arms. I believe that citizens should be armed ( who have a clean background and is a certified user). Many people who are murdered or raped and anything else (victims) are not armed. They have no defense for themselves…
- The right to bare arms is restricted as I said. We should only have people who have a clean record and only a certain type of gun. If you are a hunter you may have a shotgun and/or a handgun. Besides I am a hunter and I would be very displeased if they banned guns. So here what…
Against
- --How would people be able to defend themselves against terrorist groups if their weapons were kept in a safe place? Carrying around your weapon everywhere you go is not a good idea, for reasons I have already stated. --If you are a hunter, go to a hunting club. It's really not…
- Let me see if I understand your rationale: - We should have guns because it makes us feel safer. - People would not harm other people if they knew that they had weapons. School shootings are incredibly rare, and giving teachers guns is really not the answer. Putting a trained…
- 825.
America should continue to participate in the military coalition against ISIS
For
- In conclusion, ISIS has gained incredible notoriety in the media and for good reasons such as robbing, killing and pillaging. They are a growing terrorist cell, and are causing widespread terror. Isis is the greatest threat to world security since the beginning of the 21st…
- I as side affirmative firmly believe that this resolution will and must stand. I has already explained in great detail the extremist group that is the Islamic State, and the need for military action. I will be talking mainly about why America should participate in this military…
Against
- Sorry it"s taken me so long to get back to you, with the inclement weather weather in my area, my soccer schedule and whatnot. Any who, I"d never abandoned a decent debate regardless. To answer your questions - How could we ensure the protection of humanitarian aid: The answer…
- Ah yes, good morning to you as well, I"d imagine you"ve probably done some research on my profile to figure out who exactly I am by now which I wouldn"t blame you. I"m fairly new to Debate.org but not to debate, I Debate in the National Forensics League as a US Student. I"m…
- 826.
Healthcare reform should be banned
For
- Definitions: Healthcare reform: Affordable Healthcare Act, also known as ObamaCare Banned: in this sense I assume repealing. //abbreviations\ OC: ObamaCare HC: healthcare --Rebuttals-- My opponents main claim is OC helps the uninsured. Although this is true, one must ask of it…
- I win
Against
- The affordable healthcare act should not be banned due to the healthcare it will provide for the uninsured. Tax payers are contributing already to those on poverty insurance carriers & this will only lead to creating a more preventative healthcare future.
- 827.
Voting should be mandatory in the United States
For
- My opponent has forfeited again.
- My opponent forfeits.
Against
- Compulsory voting basically mean everyone is required to vote. If you read the first sentence I wrote, you would clearly see that compulsory voting violates (force) the rights of people, period. Those who say "yes" what will happen if someone doesn't vote; jail time, fine, or…
- 828.
Nations should adopt a binding world peace plan
For
- It is the only reasonable thing I can think of. This is just the first step, there are many more. I don't see how any other plan has any merit.
- World peace is not possible, but if it is, the only way to do it is to kill off everyone who is different, physically, racially, mentally, etc. Then have the government raise the kids so they are all raised the same.
Against
- You need to think harder. In a sense we already are. Public schools and mass media are run by the government and that's what we grow up listening to.
- So essentially, you believe what the Nazis believed?
- 829.
English should be the official US language
For
- Are you suggesting that a nation should change it's language because there are immigrants who want to use their own language instead of the country's language they immigrated to? Keep in mind there is a reason they immigrated in the first place. It might not be such a great…
- 1. The Aboriginals may speak another language but that is their constitutional right written down for them in English. 2. Immigration occurs all over the world that does not mean a nation should change their native language. 3. Many Muslims complain that English translations of…
Against
- constitusion = official language? what logic is it? If most of the people agree the topic, then why the Americans don't let English be the official language until now?
- Immigration occurs all over the world that does not mean a nation should change their native language. America's immigration are MUCH more than the other country. There are more than 300 language speak in America. English are not the most widely distributed language in the…
- 830.
The United States should build a border wall with Mexico
For
- A border wall between US and Mexico could produce great results for the United States. I had to hurry up so my arguments might have been typed a little too quick but here are the main points: 1. Influx of illegal immigrants travelling on land from Mexico and Central America…
- My arguments will be listed as so -counter past argument -keeping people in -not fearing illegal immigrants -drug gangs and legalizing the drugs -mexico is the enemy? -my argument -jobs -security -better more effective checkpoints -Improved economy Building a wall between the…
Against
- r2 Rebuttals1. We could stop illegal immigrants better with more boots on the ground [1]We need more border patrols. That is the more effective answer. 2. Drug smuggling would increase.Inherently building a huge wall between the USA and Mexico would make drugs more forbidden,…
- A border wall between the USA and Mexico terrifies me. [0] Walls work in two ways.A. To keep people out.B. To keep people in. I feel if we put up a large wall between the USA and Mexico, that the USA will be officially a police state. I don't fear the immigrants getting in, but…
- 831.
The United States should set a more constructive example for future superpowers
For
- It's good to see that we agree that the U.S. is the first modern superpower. Thank you for acceding to my point. Actually, you seem to be very confused as to whether there have been superpowers or not. I quote: "The same goes for superpowers. You say that there have never been…
- Thank you for accepting my challenge. Good luck! I did indeed assume that the U.S. is setting an example. It is folly to believe otherwise. I did NOT assume that other nations will "copy" our actions. Even so, our actions DO set precedent for how other nations will interact. I…
Against
- I do agree that the U.S. is the superpower of today. To say otherwise is absurd. But what I'm saying is that we are different from other superpowers. You still have failed to show me how our superpower status is similar to another's superpower status. What did we get from the…
- You say that we as the U.S. took whole pages from Greece and Rome and England. Yes we did. But we aren't talking about how countries are formed. And how a government is set up. What we are talking about is superpowers. The difference between the American superpower and every…
- 832.
The mainstream media has a liberal bias
For
- In the previous rounds of the debate, academic studies showed that mainstream media news sources had a heavy liberal bias, with the UCLA study showing 18 or 20 to be left of center. Con argues that the conventional definition of "news source" used by UCLA should be broadened to…
- In 1995, I published a short paper in the academic journal 'Science.' In that study, I reviewed how borehole temperature recorded a warming of about one degree Celsius in North America over the last 100 to 150 years. The week the article appeared, I was contacted by a reporter…
Against
- With regards to your example from David Deming's testimony, there is no question that NPR has some noticeable leftist leanings, as do many news sources. You can find many examples of left wing bias if you look at certain sources. However, I have a problem with you dismissing…
- Thank you for agreeing to debate me on this topic. I agree that it is easy to see bias in the media every day. News outlets try to seem objective, yet biases always appear. However, these biases are running in both directions. For every example you find of a supposed liberal…
- 833.
The US government could be responsible for disasters
For
- The United States government is the the ultimate possibility for chaos, disaster, and destruction upon the United States, and possibly the world. I will paste out the conspiracy theories in which it is POSSIBLE (which the con does not understand yet) to happen; and does make…
- "The US military is in place to protect ALL people in the United States, as well as all people who live in nations that are closely allied with the United States as well." I'd first like to point out that the U.S. military include ALL units of the military force, including…
Against
- "Basically, I defend that The United States government is trying to achieve a highly undesirable living condition for its citizens and empower themselves. "^ This is what Pro said he would argue in favor for in the very first round. Pro's attempt to change the resolution in the…
- ^ Surprisingly the forfeited round has been Pro's best performance yet.
- 834.
The United States is in decline
For
- According to the World Bank, U.S. GDP accounted for 31.8 percent of all global economic activity in 2001. That number dropped to 21.6 percent in 2011. That is not just a decline " that is a freefall. I'd also like to point out that America once had the greatest manufacturing…
- The United States is clearly in an advanced state of decline. Many people around the world (and even inside America) rejoice at this, but not me. I mourn for the country that I was born in and that I still love. Would anybody like to have a debate?
Against
- Actually recently we've had increases in our GDP. http://www.bea.gov... Also manufacturing is hardly an indication of where we're headed. America has never been defined by riches anyway. As long as our culture remains strong, we'll remain strong.
- I accept. Present your arguement.
- 835.
The United States fails to provide liberty and justice for all
For
- Yes, I fully acknowledge there is heavy discrimination everywhere in the united states. It is terrible, but not many are being killed over it. Or raped over it. Or having their genitals mutilated over it. Or being forced to do terrible things. Sexual slavery, violence all…
- After reading my opponents argument I am overall left confused at what was said to me except for the last sentence. Since that is the only point that seems to make any sense and is relevant in my eyes, I am going to merely confront that one point head on. "So whether you like…
Against
- the most important law ever made by the us government was the separation of church and state, second the british independence because those people's government system haven't move on from 17th-century which gave birth to countless british atheist(at least they have more atheist…
- how do you know when the separation of church and state is still being respected!? isn't the us government is favoring the religion christianity a bit too much which cause some anti-christ organizations or other non-christian americans to retaliate, so there is definitely a…
- 836.
The world should have one global government
For
- Take a look at the European Union. They are basically taking over the world because they will be soon coming out of Europe, as they make other countries join them. They have changed the currency for many countries in Europe, they make many, many laws & they have been having…
- Basically what you're saying is wrong. A OWG would only have to be based in one place, it wouldn't need to be based in several other locations. & it most certainly wouldn't defeat the object. It would be a good, stable idea, which would most certainly take years and years to…
Against
- Perhaps a one world currency isn't such a bad idea but there would be no need for a one world army seeing as we aren't going to be invaded by Mars or something. Plus what about power addicts? Thinking about world war two for example. If there had been your idea of a one world…
- It would defeat the idea of a OWG if there were departments for each country. Because when you think about it the departments may not have the TITLE "government" but they match the definiton dont they? "the group of people with the authority to govern a country or state; a…
- 837.
The US should get militarily involved against ISIS
For
- If you are interested in debating, accept challenge in round 1
- Your Huffington Post quote, shows no reason of how President Obama ignored Congress, and how he never consulted them on what America was going to do. In the contrary of your statement of Huffington Post, PBS Newshour states and I quote, "Thus far, there has been little clamor…
Against
- I believe this side-argument is too side tracked that you should read the post for yourself: http://www.huffingtonpost.com... In summarization, I have to say that my opponent has presented very little argument on why the U.S. should not go to war with ISIS. They have not…
- Oh, really? Then why does the Huffington Post write, "Two progressive senators declared Friday that President Barack Obama lacks authority for his growing war on the Islamic State, and are demanding that he immediately present Congress with a plan and a request seeking that…
- 838.
All US troops should be brought home
For
- Thanks to the contender for responding. Now, let's go over your three main reasons for staying in war with Iraq and Afghanistan. 1) The United States is fighting for freedom which is a good reason to fight. On the contrary, the United States is indeed not fighting for freedom,…
- For many reasons, I do not support our current wars and want the troops home!!! I'm willing to argue with anyone who would like to.
Against
- I would first like to point out my confusion to my opponent and to the voters. While refuting all three of my arguments, my opponent stated that she would go into further detail in the next round. However, there is no next round so... When refuting my first point, she claimed…
- For many reasons I disagree with my opponent that we should bring our troops home. However I will only list three. 1) The United States is fighting for freedom which is a good reason to fight. 2) Even more lives will be lost if we withdraw our troops at the moment. The…
- 839.
Puerto Rico should become an independent nation
For
- I will be brief with my responses as I can tell from your argument that you are not adamant and may just be misinformed. "1. The US has a tremendous amount of economic investment in Puerto Rico that directly benefits the people. " -Please give examples, and how independence…
- For over one hundred years now Puerto Rico has been in political limbo. It is time Americans recognize the mutual benefit of allowing Puerto Rico to become an independent nation. Statehood advocates argue that we will be entitled to more help (dependence) as a state... Status…
Against
- I certainly agree with you that Puerto Rico should not continue in its current shameful "territory" system which is only taxation without representation. I will argue that Puerto Rico's best economic interests are to achieve statehood and not to become independent. 1. The US…
- I concede. Arguing "devil's advocate" is too hard when it makes no sense at all. Let's just keep forfeiting until it goes into voting.
- 840.
Australia should adopt a new national flag
For
- I would like to acknowledge their elders past, present and future. The flag of Australia is what represents Australia on an international level. It is not our politicians, but our flag that embodies the Australian system and way of life on the international stage. It is…
- The topic of this debate is: 'That Australia should adopt a new National Flag' I will debate the Affirmative, and the opponent the Negative. The opponent will be preferably an Australian citizen, or someone with experience in the Australian political landscape.
Against
- To begin, I think I should start off with a little bit of history of Australia. Before European explorers came and settled in Australia, there were the many hundreds of indigenous tribes. The indigenous peoples of Australia had initially come to Australia between 40,000 to…
- I am an Australian citizen, and have substantial knowledge about Australian politics, hopefully I can bring some new things to consider. I am assuming basic rules like no ad hominem attacks, no logical fallacies, cite your sources etc. are in place.
- 841.
The Netherlands should strengthen freedom of speech
For
- What do you think of freedom of speech in the Netherlands? Firstly we will give our opinion and then you can react to this and send in your own opinion or idea about this topic. We think that freedom of speech in the Netherlands should be limited a little bit more, we think…
Against
- I win
- extend
- 842.
The veto power should be abolished
For
- but my point is that this five nations are abusing of the power they were given because they are using it to protect or attack countries according to their interests and not because is what"s best for the world. This was supposed to be a "democratic system" but this is nothing…
- A principal reason for this has been the refusal of one or another of the Five Permanent Members to set aside their own interests. Additionally, the veto is often is "used in order to protect countries with which (permanent members) have close cultural, economic and/or…
Against
- Yes I was just making my arguments and stating my stance. I will first rebut Pro's point. Pro stated that the permanent five nations have been abusing the power they were given to protect or attack countries according to their interest. I believe that this statement is flawed.…
- As Con, I am debating that veto power should not be abolished. Veto power refers to a privilege held by the five permanent members in the United Nations Security Council that allows them to prevent any substantiated resolutions from being adopted. The 5 permanent members are…
- 843.
Elections are bought, not won
For
- I accept the interpretation of the resolution, and hold that DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS ARE MORE BOUGHT THAN WON MAKING THEM A COMMODITY Contention 1. Political Campaigns=Advertising Campaigns A) ELECTIONS ARE TV SHOWS i. most citizens do not care entirely ii. most voters know a…
Against
- Given that NPDAgeek has forfeited his response, all of my arguments still stand.
- Seeing that NPDAgeek has forfeited round 3, all of my round 2 arguments still stand! Failing to respond to arguments means he concedes them, and thus these arguments should be accepted as TRUE in the debate. Since NPDAgeek agrees that: 1. Elections are a Form of Democratic…
- 844.
The United States should ban armed drones
For
- ok
- hi i will be doing this some time soon bye
Against
- Very well, we have agreed to do another debate. Messege me when you are ready.
- My opponent has forfeited. I give him the option to build his case during THIS round and rebuttal and conclusions will go together in the next round. Either that or he loses the debate.
- 845.
The United States is not the greatest country in the world
For
- Canada. Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, Greenland, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, part of Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the UK, and Uruguay have had gay marriage a whole lot longer than the USA.…
- America is not the greatest country in the world. A lot of people say that America is the greatest country in the world because we have freedom. Well we aren't the only country in the world with freedom. Canada has freedom. Japan has freedom. The UK, France, Italy, Spain,…
Against
- Rebuttals 1. Pro copy pasted when i made my own arguements. Even though my arguements are weaker he is cheating. Also he didn't write his sources. 2. What is freedom? Please explain Dedicated to safe traffic laws Many countries have not have safe traffic laws when America has…
- America is the best country in the world because it has equal laws for everyone and also gay marriage.
- 846.
All governments should be forced to become fully transparent
For
- I would also like to point out to all you Americanos that 'this house' is merely a way of introducing a resolution, similar to 'be it resolved. ' I would define 'this house' as the United Nations, 'all governments' as U. N member states and 'force' as to strongly encourage in a…
- My opponent has no understood my arguments. He continues to attack the candlesticks without considering the entire home, let alone the dining room or anything else. The fact of the matter is that there will be sacrifices; we must choose between a new, better way of life and the…
Against
- 1. The resolution demands revocation of inherent human right to privacy. Medical records and performance reviews of government employees would be revealed. 2. Gag orders in the criminal cases would be overridden, resulting in prejudicial publicity and needless harm to the…
- Pro claims, "My opponent has no understood my arguments. He continues to attack the candlesticks without considering the entire home, let alone the dining room or anything else." I believe that I understand Pro's arguments better than Pro. Pro has put forth what he claims to be…
- 847.
The US should use military force to stop nuclear proliferation
For
- First, nations should only take actions that are in their best interest for three reasons. 1. the ultimate purpose of a nation is to protect its citizenry from outside threats or else the citizens wouldn't give up some of their freedoms to be a part of it. If a nation poses a…
- Let's launch right in. On diplomacy, my opponent says that Iran proves that we can use diplomacy and that military did not back it up. But Iran would never have followed our efforts at diplomacy if not for our military prowess. We need to be able to use our military force to…
Against
- I'd just like to point out right now that I could have ended this debate in the very beginning. Really, I only had to prove that the US COULD NOT possibly use military option, meaning to prove it's not feasible. But, for the sake of fairness and debate, I'd like to defend what…
- I'll go right to my opponent's attack: The pro is suggesting that military action can be used to prevent the assembly of a weapon before it takes place. However, both of the pro's examples could be done through diplomacy. There also isn't any evidence provided that military…
- 848.
Scotland should become independent
For
- Scotland can VERY easily rejoin the EU. They would not lose money, because they have oil. The oil would make them rich. And what about powerful allies? The only tie they'd lose is that with England. And what if?
- (1) What makes you think that Scotland would suffer? (2) This is NOT about fame. Do you genuinely think that Alex Salmond wants to be an A-list celebrity? Even David Cameron and Alistair Darling have admitted that Scotland could succeed on its own as an independent country. You…
Against
- The votes already been made and they were voted to not be independent.
- Scotland would loose support systems such as the NHS and would not be part of the EU. They would be isolated and loose money. I'M not saying he wants to be a A list celebrity but he did want power and that's why he quit as he failed. Well they'd loose money from the oil being…
- 849.
America should not act as the world's police
For
- I'd like to point out why I'm for the U. S being the worlds police, Because the UN is too weak to do so. I like to think of the U. S as Mandalore from Star Wars. The U. S is powerful and can defeat anyone in a ground war. Guerrilla war not so much. U. S involvement in affairs…
Against
- Da svydanya
- Anything
- 850.
Government should restrict same-sex marriage
For
- Rebuttal I: Constitutional Right.Con does not understand the premise of not being in the Constitution. Being a Right in the Constitution means it can NOT be restricted, with exception of course. Not being a right means it can be restricted.The Government does protect the rights…
- Outline:To prove the Resolution false, I will first prove that Gay Marriage isn't a protected right in Argument I, then move to show why the Government acknowledges Marriage in the first place in Argument II, showing that acknowledging Gay Marriage is outside the Governments…
Against
- Exactly, same gender marriage is NOT a Constitutional right, so government doesn't have the power to restrict it. Giving government this power will go against the whole purpose of government! You talk about how being denied marriage is not unconstitutional, but it is.…
- Suppose you are a boy and you just happened to fall in love with another boy. After a couple years of dating, you want to get married. Then you go to the state authority to get your marriage license...only you can't. The government is not allowing same gender marriage. First of…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?