Philosophy Debate Topics for Students — page 25

For

• Sure no problem. Why not debate it though?
• extend

For

• I agree that we need internal brotherhood before universal but what does that have anything to do with patriotism? Definition for patriotism:Web definitions: love of country and willingness to sacrifice for it; That has nothing to do with loving for each other. Only our…
• I will be arguing Pro for Universal Brotherhood. Yet, I don't believe World Peace is possible, I still wish it was and think it is important. Argument: Patriotism CAN lead to thinking one's country is supreme which leads to conflict. One could argue that Hitler and the Nazi…

For

• This time the whole argument has been lifted from here (http://intjforum.com...) and yet still hasn't responded to my case. In fact, it doesn't even affirm anything.
• My opponent's entire argument is plagiarised. It is sourced here:. http://psycnet.apa.org...The paper he is sourcing is "SelfKnowledge of Personality: Do People Know Themselves? " also viewable here: . http://www.simine.com...Also, none of that is relevant to my case, and is…

For

• Opponent's concession:I'd like to point out that my opponent basically conceded that socialism isn't immoral. They said it right here in their second to last sentence in round 2:"Socialism in itself is not immoral, but modern day applied socialism, mandated without consent, is…
• I can within the next 3 hours or so, so if you respond within that time and give me sufficient time to respond, then I can tonight. Otherwise, I'll respond tomorrow probably 18-20 hours from now.

For

• Whether or not they believe their life is pointless is moot. The debate topic is that in the large scale, the average person is forgotten in the lesser part of a century. Therefore in the end, the average Joes life is pointless. I think my life has a point but the best source…
• I will first like to apologize for not posting. I lost track of time. "[E]veryone has the ability to make it big no matter where they are from." This is technically true however this is an extreamely rare case. But even if this happens, those people do not end up in the…

For

• I forfeit this debate. I think I picked an unfair topic. It seems impossible to refute.
• Good point, however, that does not refute the confirmation bias.

For

• (1) Faith and Reason are Irreconcilable Faculties of Acceptance Faith, properly defined and understood is the acceptance of something for which there is no evidence. To have faith, then, is to believe and accept in the absence of evidence. To know, is to believe and accept on…
• RESOLVED: FAITH AND REASON ARE IRRECONCILABLE.Background:It has been almost ten months since I have engaged in a debate, but this a topic that I am invested enough in to discuss at length with anyone who is up for the challenge.My interest in this topic began out of this forum…

For

• If reality is an illusion, then it isn't real, again by common usage. Using dictionary.com, I looked up illusion: 2.the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension. 3.an instance of being deceived. In fact, I've shown that the very things my opponent calls real are…
• My opponent invokes the sense of touch, and cognitive ability as evidence of reality, but they are neither. Consider that humans will likely one day have the ability to stimulate nerves in such a way that it fools the brain into thinking a computer generated object is real.…

For

• I choose to forfeit this debate, as I do not plan on using DEBATE.ORG. I have found a better online debate community.
• Thanks in advance to the person who accepts this debate. This was a recent UIL topic that I enjoyed debating and wanted to try it out as my first debate on this site. Ld Structure please (including CX) William Baxter, the Professor of Law at Stanford University, stated that…

For

• yes you win, its that easy
• sure

For

• yup
• = Road Map = 4. Road Map - duh 5. Framework - I will extend my framework, and show it preempts Con arguments. 6. Rebuttal - I will respond to Con's refutations in a line-by-line rebuttal 7. Highlights - I will highlight the important issues which may have been lost in the…

For

• A. Any moral philosophy tries to grasp what is and what should be in terms of reality. J. S. Mill and his philosophy however are based on a major flaw with what is. He bases the ideal of Utility on happiness which means that individuals are classifying an act as good or bad.…

For

• "a shirt IS the color it is. It is a FACT that light of only certain wavelengths will reflect from the fabric in the shirt." It is true that only certain wavelengths will reflect from a fabric in a shirt. But the jump from this objective reality to the perception in the brain…
• There are several things wrong with your argument You say that happiness has some objectivity because there is objectivity to pain and pleasure. But this statement is wrong. Take the example of a masochist. They enjoy pain during sex. They enjoy pain, therefore pain is…

For

• This argument is about whether or not this statement is true: "Most truths in reality are not Black and White. Rather, most truth is somewhere in the middle of two extremes." When talking about 'black and white' and 'extremes' it refers to two very polar viewpoints on a topics…

For

• The debate boils down to this . I say you canot prove reality to exist outside of our minds so all the experiments are based on faith that the world exists outside of our minds. I say science is based on the faith that our observations are true. My opponent says the world is…
• My opponents argument goes like this : Quote: If we assume reality isn"t real then what"s the point of having physical bodies? If you belief that reality is not real, walk in front of a fast moving car, or jump from a 100 story building (matrix jump it). You will not do either…

For

• General criticismsContradictaries: In his response, Con, at various times, holds 3 distinct positions:(i) God cannot act to prevent gratuitous evil (denial of P1)(ii) God acts to prevent gratuitous evil and we know His means (theodicy)(iii) God's actions are completely beyond…
• IntroductionIn this round, I'll be defending the argument I laid out in R1. Defending P1Put simply, P1 states that if God exists, gratuitous evils do not.This seems necessarily true. God, as defined, would have both the means and the motive to prevent this kind of evil, if He…

For

• Debates are unreliable sources of truth because the contenders contradict each others statements, no matter how smart ones argument is the other guy will probably contradict that with another smart sounding argument. Isn't all the debates out there enough proof. Sure there are…
• 'The statement above is clearly false because by saying: My opponent is arguing. .. He has proven my point: In debates, what occurs is that one contender states his/her argument while the other states his/hers witch contradicts the statement of the first debater. The first…

For

• lol: give me conduct, but don't vote on anything else. I think that's fair. >:DBut on a serious note, vote CON. Good luck later on in teh tourney.
• I am going to concede, partly because I am questioning the whole motion itself whenever I read it, but mostly due to personal lack of time. Too many debates, school starting, and other commitments are causing too many problems. Vote TUF.

For

• Con puts forward a good argument that shows why possibility should be accepted in the definition of Equal Opportunity (EO). However this debate is not about which word should be used in the definition the words individually, but rather what the phrase refers to.Take for…
• Accept.

For

• You may do whatever you want, but if you look in the comments you will see why.
• Forfeiture.

For

• I will start by debunking my opponent's claims. My Opponent: "Yes. What you don't understand is that when new discoveries are made the person is usually allowed to name them right there. If you want to define something which is blue as red go ahead. But you are wrong." My…
• I will first start by undermining my opponent's arguments, then I will get to defending my own. My Opponent: "So how can I win against you at all if I can't even prove anything existence? " You should of thought about that before you accepted this debate, that's not my problem.…

For

• Clarifications/rebuttals: "This is a fair statement, although morality is defined as "principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior." [1]. Just so we can be clear to a definitive, objective definition." This is a perfectly valid…
• My opponent has offered several good points and examples, all of which add nuance to the discussion and require a somewhat deeper analysis than my earlier points. They lead excellently into my next points by introducing another essential factor of decision making, specifically…

For

• The statement that you believe to know with absolution is that 'it's impossible to know anything with absolution', or that you can't know anything without doubt. You also stated that not knowing if we're right or wrong doesn't dictate if we're right or wrong. But the argument…
• You have provided little evidence for your original statement. You assumed that either something else could be proved through, witch would obviously mean you win, or nothing can be proved through, making the original statement true. But since you haven't provided evidence for…

For

• The Mere-Addition Paradox P1 - According to Utilitarianism, a society with more total pleasure is preferable to a society with less total pleasure. Ex. A society with 100 hedons is preferable to a society with 99 hedons. For an explanation of how hedons are calculated under…
• Full resolution: That the consequentialist theory of ethics known as Utilitarianism is false in all of its forms.Definitions:Consequentialism: Any normative theory which states that the ethical course of conduct is necessarily the one which produces the best…

For

• (Since Mangani has declined to accept this challenge 3 times, even while boldly and falsely proclaiming that my YECS argument's major premise is not true, and I am currently advised that he is not accpeting challenges at this time, I am opening up the challenge to anyone who…
• I recently affirmed the proposition offered here again for your consideration. Some seemed to be lulled into believing that posted, incomplete effort by TSH rebutted my simple truth claim regarding the fundamental, true principle accepted amongst critical thinking authorities…

For

• Some situations where surrender works where futile struggle does not.
• Accepting defeat for a greater victory.

For

• ok, let me be specific, dictionary.com says faith is belief that is not based on proof i gave an example of how something that is belived to belive without any evidence is actually using evidence. now, i will admit that you win this debate if you can give me one example of a…
• ok, when i say faith, i mean beliving something, anything without evidence many religious people say that you have to have faith to belive in god so they claim to belive in god without evidence. this isnt true because they do have what they belive is evidence, wether it be a…

For

• You say that it is one thing for a ship to go 15 knots, while it could go 20, and for a ship to go 10 knots because it cannot go 15. If God knows that the ship will go 15 knots, and because he is not fallible, is it truly possible for the ship to go 20 in that same trip? If it…
• I abstain from saying God because it is impossible for him to be omniscient and omnipotent. If x being is omniscient, then it knows the future. If it knows the future and, (let's assume x being is not fallible) is never wrong, then it knows y event will happen. For example, if…

For

• "First lets decide what do you want the soul to be. Do you want it to be the processor, the hardware or the software? I am really confused. This debate can be immaterial as you cannot take this site out of this computer screen, but will it mean it has a soul?" I'm saying the…
• The Immaterial Soul Well yes I'll agree with you that the immaterials might be stored in our brains. But this doesn't mean that they aren't immaterials because they're stored somewhere. Numbers are abstracts that physically don't actually exist. Like the shapes "1, 2, and 3"…

For

• stand4something has not only committed completely unwarranted ad hominem, but has clearly missed the point of this debate. I ask him to concede and to apologize for his outlandish behavior. The winner of this debate is clear. I shall say no more.
• This is my opponent's first debate on this website, so I understand if he is confused. However, that does not distract from the fact that my opponent has not addressed my resolution. He believes that my position is that "One debater always has a greater burden of proof than…

For

• Opening Argument:As stated in the introduction, my premise is that:1) Anarchism is (and will be in this debate) defined as: opposition to authority and hierarchy.2) Capitalism is centered around hierarchy.3) Meaning, anarchism is inherently anti-capitalist.4) Thus,…
• Because of full forfeit from my previous opponent, I have decided to make a second attempt at this debate. I have made it impossible to accept, so if you're interested then leave a comment saying such. Introduction:This debate will be centered around the idea that…

For

• Altruism: the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others.In order for an action to be truly altruistic the action must be committed with the intention to help someone else without considering the benefits for one self. If an action…
• I must try to be brief. There really is no proof for anything so all of my statements are therefore just assumptions based on logic. But they are assumptions backed up by a lot of evidence. Some of them will be bold. Criticize if you wish.Your question P.S.2: There is nothing…

For

• When dinosaurs existed the world was doing perfectly fine and after dinosaurs existed the world was doing perfectly fine but then humans the mighty humans /people had to come and ruin the world us vampires wolves and witches created. So the world you peoples created will never…
• People just take up space in the world and they are causing global warming. People also have really negative vibes causing the world to spin slower than before.People make work hard and so that's why I think they are unnecessary!

For

• Absolute truth exist.

For

• Any further points to make, Shyamjaxsnipe?
• Okay so if I'm understanding you correctly, I think you're basing it on the presupposition that fate exists - then you go into what exactly fate is, In this case involving previous/future timelines and how these things relate to karma. I'm a little confused as to what your…

For

• From my original two contentions, I think this debate has come down to three key areas of clash. The first two are the issues I identified last round - the reciprocity and consent of social contracts. The third is whether individuals have recourse. What has NOT been an issue of…
• I must admit I'm a bit spooked by the notion that he's anticipating what I'm about to write. I wonder if his crystal ball has any accuracy. .. I said I would argue two points, which together hold that people agree to the mutual forfeiture of rights. The reciprocity and…

For

• http://en.wikipedia.org...The terms of good and evil which I will use in order to avoid confusion are:Evil-Profoundly immoralGood-To be desired or approved of. In other words to be morally right.Moral- Principles concerning between right and wrongSource of definitions:…
• Round 1) AcceptanceRound 2) Main ArguementRound 3) Each Side Gives RebuttalsRound 4) Answer to Rebuttals, Final Arguement

For

• Ok to summarize my debate:Reality is no more important than Fantasy. I state this due to the following reasons. Firstly, Fantasy gives us purpose. Con stated that without Fantasy we would still have the purpose of surviving. However I argue that is neither a purpose, nor is it…
• You state that without Fantasy we would still have the instinctual desire to survive. Tell me, what makes this desire to survive? What makes us have this instinct? Where does it come from? Freud argued it came from our desire of Pleasure vs Pain and our desire to Reproduce so…

For

• Fear is an element that each of us face in different ways, and at many intervals during the course of our lives. We may suffer fear of physical confrontations, emotional clashes, personal and professional setbacks, declining physical or mental capacities. When undertaking an…
• In general, people who are successful are those who have learn to take risk. In the business world, those who earn more money are those who have learned how to take greater risk. The concept of overcoming fear is based on the fact that people should learn how to get out of…

For

• Summary of dropped arguments. Con seems to have dropped his points arguing from both his point regarding determinism's relationship to the initial conditions of existence as well as the point regarding whether or not knowledge of something about to happen is compatible with…
• First, I'd like to point out that Con has not really attempted to refute my argument. He has not challenged either the validity of the argument or the soundness of the premises. Con simply states that he doesn't think there's any reason for them to be incompatible. That's what…

For

• In my last round I will give a rebuttal to my opponent's case and simultaneously further my own arguments. Rebuttal Law of Nature (A2) My opponent seems to argue we cannot have moral disagreement, unless morality is objective. Here my opponent offers no justification whatsoever…
• Extending all arguments.My opponent has violated the rules of conduct, to which he agreed to by accepting this debate. The opening arguments are to be made in Round 2, as was stated in Round 1. It's a shame my opponent has not complied with the arrangement of this debate, as I…

For

• I suppose that my opponent decided that he was not actually apposed to my position. Well I will write this so as not to forfeit.
• I believe you may be mistaken as to exactly what I'm proposing. My argument is against empirical knowledge, not knowledge generally. You know that you are a perceiver and that as such you perceive images of something that resembles an outside world. Also logic presumably you…

For

• Before I proceed to present anymore evidence specifically for my case, i will have to show, as DrySponge said, that power is the greater over liberty.Ask yourself this, since when has liberty been taken, before power has supported it? The answer is it never has been. Power and…
• The republic was weak and corrupt in ancient Rome. Though I do not in the slightest agree with Hitlers idea of what makes a superior being, the truth is that the Weimar Republic was weak as well. Whether or not you agree or disagree with either of these men and their ideologies…

For

• I have to admit I had never thought from your angle before and I hope I don't end up contradicting myself. I think I can persuade the readers to my view but if not then perhaps you will have persuaded me. So lets get started. SUMMARRY OF CON'S ARGUMENT: He's stating that…
• This is a philosophical debate. My argument is that if nobody in the world was ever sad, angry, annoyed, etc. there could be no happiness. As far as I see it you can't have positive without these negative emotions. If you were permamently happy then you wouldn't be happy. You…

For

• Morally Troubling Outcomes
• Impossible to apply to non-humans

For

• Thank you so much, rougeagent21. One quick point before I get started, my user name is Lolagirl57; hence I am a girl and a "her". You referred to me as a "him". Sorry, but I felt a need to tell you that. Anyways, let me address some of the points you made about my points-…
• The Greek writer Sophocles wrote "The end excuses any evil." In other words, the end justifies the means, and this is what I will be arguing. In this case, the end is the final result and the means are what you use or do to get to the final result. In simpler terms, this means…

For

• Thank you for the opening arguments. I begin with another definition of supernatural. Supernatural - unable to be explained by science or the laws of nature : of, relating to, or seeming to come from magic, a god, etc. [1] Here are the rules of scientific method: "Ask a…
• Good luck.

For

• My opponent doesn't realize he must post a case that supports his point of view(namely God doesn't exist). Proving God is unnecessary doesn't prove he doesn't exist, but even so I refuted those arguments as I will continue to do in this round. Russell's TeapotMy opponent brings…
• My opponent has yet to post a case, refuting my arguments do not fulfill the BOP that he was given in the rules and confirmed in PM. While my opponents refutations are obviously false, it doesn't matter because my opponent has failed to justify his position. He must either…

For

• Okay, we can look to definitions in this debate as well as what actually come of it. For that reason, here are my official definitions: Deontological ethics: In deontological ethics an action is considered morally good because of some characteristic of the action itself, not…
• 2nd round is a constructive case. 3rd round will be our only rebuttal. 4th round will be final statements and voters. No new ideas allowed since there will be no time to respond. Also, consequentialism is defined as looking to the ends of an action to determine its moral worth…

For

• Hello. I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this argument, I hope to show that the two largest idealogies in episteomology are flawed and that a new way of looking at knowledge is needed. First, I will show the flaw's with Empiricism and to a lesser extent the whole…
• This is a debate regarding Rationalism and Empiricism, two directly conflicting ways of gaining knowledge and of looking at the world. I will be arguing that though each of these theories have obvious pros to them, there are enough cons that we can confidently say that…