Discussly

Law Debate Topics — page 28

2,217 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 28 of 45
  1. 1351.

    Capital punishment should be legal in all U.S. states

    For

    • Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, should be legal in all states. Currently, it is only legal in 32 states. Sometimes, the ultimate crime deserves the ultimate punishment. An eye for an eye. Crimes such as, premeditated murder, murder of children, rape of…
    • Forfeit.

    Against

    • Pro has burden of proof, so I just have to rebut his points. I can raise three objections to his case. 1. He never warrants the claim that the "ultimate crime deserves the ultimate punishment". Justice does not necessarily have to be focused on retribution; it can also be…
    • My opponent has conceded the debate in comments.
  2. 1352.

    All drugs should be legalized, taxed, and regulated

    For

    • First of all, I'd like more explanation on how the prison system won't exist without drug cartels, because I'm unclear on how. But, obviously drug cartels will exist but their power in both numbers and fear will decrease immensely due to the opening of markets nationwide (not…
    • Thank you for accepting. I will start with the first topic you mentioned you'd like covered: criminal organizations. By this, I can only believe you mean drug cartels. Yes, the drug cartel is a problem costing citizen's lives. One effect of legalizing drugs and regulating them…

    Against

    • Hello Zeke Forgive me but one no longer wishes to discuss this debate, for I'm not really interested in the legal aspects of drugs at the moment, I'm just invested in the socio-psychological aspects. Once again apologies, i hope you can accept a tie/void, and perhaps we could…
    • Hello I will know provide my statement. This round will solely be based on my opinion so I am authentic in my approach, the next round I'll introduce data if necessary. I will be approaching this from a psychological standpoint. I'll tackle this head on before discussing…
  3. 1353.

    Everyone has a right to keep and bear arms

    For

    • If you actually read the U.S Constitution you would know that the right to bear arms means carrying a firearm. Killing a bear has nothing to do with this unless you hunt, and in that case people do have the right to hunt. I do understand that if a specific species is at risk,…
    • We all have the right to bear arms, isn't that what the U.S Constitution states? So why is it all of a sudden horrible to own a gun. People argue guns kill people, but last time I checked the gun was not going off by itself, they had a hand attached to it and someone pulling…

    Against

    • No, we actually don't have the right to bear arms without a license. Killing a Bear, and taking its arm is considered poaching in America, and in most states can result in serious jail time. When this amendment was passed there were no poaching laws so this was acceptable. Now…
    • But we still don't have the right to bear arms? I would appreciate it if you weren't such a poaching advocate. Ok the NRA leader (Charles Heston) believes all these guns problems are because we have a more mixed ethnicity in the United States. Let me go over the reason you…
  4. 1354.

    India should legalize brothels and amend anti-prostitution laws

    For

    • Honourable Judges and my most worthy opponent, pls goto http://debateorg-round4.blogspot.in... the remaining part of Round 4 of the debate which I couldn't complete due to a sudden prior appointment.I'm extending my argumentsWHAT??? Is that ALL you had to say?Honourable Judges,…
    • This is kinda sad. My opponent does not understand the importance of citations... Huh... How is this guy a debater, again? Citations maybe important, but only for those where it is really required and there are reasons for the same. I have won all my past 4 debates. Do you know…

    Against

    • I'm extending my arguments because:1. I didn't have time to reply.2. Your cases don't have any evidence backing you up. My opponent has no evidence backing him. This debate was won before it was started. He has dropped several arguments. He uses his "reasoning" to try to debunk…
    • I'm extending my arguments
  5. 1355.

    Drug use should be fully legalized in the United States

    For

    • I argue that drug use in the US should be fully legalized, legalizing all forms of drugs, not simply marijuana. I have the burden of proof to convince voters that fully legalizing all drugs makes logical sense.
    • It is not the government's job to control what people are doing to their bodies. Additionally, there is no evidence to back up my opponent's claim that the deathrate will skyrocket upon legalization. In fact, the evidence points to the contrary, as I demonstrated in Round 2. I…

    Against

    • I accept.
    • As you can see, my opponent has forfieted a round as well. Drug legalization is a stupid idea to be honest, because it will a big danger to humans, and will also cause a large death rate due to people using drugs in the wrong way.
  6. 1356.

    It should be legal to fire employees for being gay

    For

    • Again, if you want, we can continue the debate in the comments.
    • This debate has been re-instated because my previous opponent forfeited 3 rounds. Please do not accept this debate if you're going to forfeit more than one round. Also, no semantics. Now for my disclaimer: Before anyone gets mad at me, I do think that it is morally wrong to…

    Against

    • Oh well
    • I accept. That is all I have to say.
  7. 1357.

    Gun bans will never reduce violence

    For

    • I think my opponent will be hard pressed to show a gun ban that ever worked in any sense of the word, be it in reducing gun ownership or in reducing gun violence. Firstly, I will prove how gun bans do not reduce gun ownership. It is well documented in Australia, many owners of…
    • I will show that banning guns never works. I need an opponent who supports some form of gun ban.

    Against

    • vote for me due to conduct and forfiet
    • My opponent provides some example about Australia and how the gun ban impacted them. I think this example was very interesting but it was only one example and it was Australia out of all countries. Gun bans aren't primarly made to reduce gun ownership. It is primarily made to…
  8. 1358.

    Same-sex marriage should be protected by federal law

    For

    • I. I am gay. I was made a certain way and never had a choice. It was important for me to use many sources and ALL ARE SCIENTIFICALLY BASED. I know how easy it is to find a non-scientific biased site, but all of my sources are scientific. II. Homosexuality is natural. It is not…
    • I. Equal Protection Clause In the Supreme Court Case, Loving vs. Virginia, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that two people could marry each other even if they were different races. It overturned interracial marriage bans. This proves that you cannot stop two individuals…

    Against

    • "In the Supreme Court Case, Loving vs. Virginia, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that two people could marry each other even if they were different races." This case sets a precedent which allows people of different races to marry one another. Homosexuality is not a race,…
    • Please explain how the fourteenth amendment protects homosexual behavior. No homosexual's rights are being infringed. They have the right to get married (to someone of the opposite sex) and have kids just like anyone else. Heterosexual men don't have the right to marry each…
  9. 1359.

    Private firearm possession is necessary for the people

    For

    • or "What is the meaning of the Second Amendment? ", but rather "If the Constitution never existed to protect private firearm ownership, would there still be a logical reason for or against gun control? " * To defend my point: from a logical point of view, gun control does not…

    Against

    • Hopefully I will get the chance to debate my opponent properly on this topic when he gets back. In the meantime, thanks for reading, feel free to vote if you want. And check out my other debates if you have time. Thankyou.
    • As readers will be able to see from the comments pages, my worthy opponent has been forced to forfeit the debate he instigated. I don't know what the protocol is in these situations. Would it be unfair of me to continue arguing my position? For now I reaffirm the arguments I…
  10. 1360.

    Laws should prohibit racial discrimination

    For

    • I get that emotional harm isn't enough of a valid argument as to why there should be such a law. Laws against bullying are actually existent in 43 of the 50 states, although fairly different things, the law was created to do nothing more than prevent self and emotional harm. I…
    • I'd like to open up by pointing out that I'm not against racism. I am starting this debate to get the hang of the topic so soon I can make one for the position I fully stand behind. With that being said you (con) also do not have to be a racist to debate back. I'd also like to…

    Against

    • Let me start off by noting the gross injustice my opponent is trying to commit in his second paragraph: change the resolution. He notes that the law would " serve to defend the entire population not just the minority" and yet, before his actual argument in the first section…
    • I would like to start off by thanking my opponent for setting up this debate. I might note, that is the Pro side and the instigator, the BoP lies within my opponent to prove why this law should be passed. I would, however, like to note a few things right off the bat,…
  11. 1361.

    Private ownership of a gun in the US should be illegal

    For

    • Why do people forfeit?
    • Forfeit - points to me.

    Against

    • I do not see the problem with private gun ownership, if the guns are registered and under a license. But to get your guns it should be like the Australian System where you have to give reason for wanting guns. And you have to attend gun safety courses, and attend Gun clubs on a…
  12. 1362.

    The death penalty deters crime and saves lives

    For

    • Sorry for making it end early. But I decided to thank you ahead of time. Since she didn't visaby refute I will just add on to my aruments first: firstly lets start with deterence: A 2003 study he co-authored, and a 2006 study that re-examined the data, found that each execution…
    • "Lets get something straight first I believe that one innocent life lost is one too may."Sure I understand your feelings, but you need to be realistic. I have done basic math prong that more people are saved. If one execution saves 3-18 lives, and the very very low chance of…

    Against

    • As I am the last speaker I will make this last round a summation focusing on two main points of clash: deterrence and saving lives as the motion of the debate would suggest. In the first round Pro made the case that it deters crime because humans fear nothing more than death. I…
    • Since my opponent thinks the debate is finished I will make this short. In the first few rounds I have shown why this is not going to work as a deterrence therefore I will strengthen my case for why this is not going to save lives. Say the police eventually manage to catch and…
  13. 1363.

    The federal government should stop attacking the medical marijuana industry

    For

    • 1. That land belongs to the States in which where they are doing it is legal. So stop wasting our tax dollars on gigantic stacks of paperwork just because you have nothing better to do but dedicate yourself to making this economy fail even more.They do it for a reason and it…
    • I argee to your terms?

    Against

    • 2. When I say not addicting, I mean not addicting to the majority. Those select few who become addicted have the potential to become addicted to anything because that's embedded in their personalities. As for a source here's one I just found in a…
    • Well, alright then.
  14. 1364.

    Prisoners should be allowed to publish full details of their crimes

    For

    • Fummy, you must argue. This is getting out of hand. I am alright with it if you unexpectedly could not log in or got no Wi-Fi. I feel that is fine with me.
    • "Do you honestly think that anyone wants their children to be reading 'And I ripped his intestines out, drank his blood, cut his throat an watched the blood drip all over my dinner, which I ate. The blood was so nice.'?" Do you honestly think that the books that they make are…

    Against

    • I greatly apologize for the forfeit. I was away unexpectedly and had no Internet. You have not talked about the disgusting and bloody detail. Do you honestly think that anyone wants their children to be reading 'And I ripped his intestines out, drank his blood, cut his throat…
    • OK. This debate is plain and simple. 1st round is for acceptance. No trolls, no idiots, no forfeits.
  15. 1365.

    The death penalty should be abolished

    For

    • I will have to concede; I recently got accepted to one of the biggest jobs I can ever think of joining. I know this is very disrespectful to my opponent on my part, and I am very sorry for that. Get angry at me all you want, but it won't change.However, this has been a great…
    • I will jump straight to the debate.C1) A single death sentence is very expensive"The study estimates that the average cost to Maryland taxpayers for reaching a single death sentence is $3 million - $1.9 million more than the cost of a non-death penalty case. (This includes…

    Against

    • I myself will be arguing that the death penalty should not be abolished and should be continued, First round is for acceptance.
    • I don't understand?
  16. 1366.

    Marijuana should not be classified as a drug

    For

    • Marijuanna is simply a plant because it grows in the ground.

    Against

    • And. .. .
    • I extend my arguments...
  17. 1367.

    The death penalty is a just punishment for convicted murderers

    For

    • "Is that a joke? I believe I have actually pointed out NINE reasons as to why killing shouldn't warrant the same action. They are listed next to numbers 1 - 9 in this debate (in case you missed that)." My Response: your nine points don't explain why the criminals ought to…
    • Contention 1 My opponent says that I'm only being opinionated when I said my attack. However, I can say the same about her. My opponent never warrants why killing shouldn't warrant the same action. She then restates the finger analogy. My argument was that killing violates all…

    Against

    • * Pro: Your 9 points explain that the application is a faulty system. The system doesn't make the punishment inherently unjust. REBUTTAL: My points did touch upon the issue of justice. For instance - hypocrisy. We agree that taking the life of another human being (when you are…
    • 1. HYPOCRISY "My opponent never warrants why killing shouldn't warrant the same action." Is that a joke? I believe I have actually pointed out NINE reasons as to why killing shouldn't warrant the same action. They are listed next to numbers 1 - 9 in this debate (in case you…
  18. 1368.

    A gun ban would effectively reduce crime rates

    For

    • Thank you for your statement. I will now proceed to present my argument within the allowance of the rules.1. Murder and Homicide rates as a result of firearms will be reduced.Majority of firearms will be confiscated or banned from civilians, which may spark an outrage and an…
    • I will accept your offer to debate on the occurring subject and do my best to respond appropriately.

    Against

    • Rebuttal1. Murder and Homicide rates as a result of firearms will be reduced.Firearm-related deaths in Brazil decreased dramatically in response to its passing of gun reformatory laws. However, as time past, it has risen. In fact, according to a report on violence in Brazil,…
    • I look forward to a clean and friendly debate!Presentations1) A gun ban will only empower criminalsCivilians will be asked to dispose of their firearms, if any, maybe by handing them over to law enforcement. However, as you may have guessed, criminals will refuse, thus…
  19. 1369.

    Convicted rapists should be castrated

    For

    • Complete Forfeit by ConVote Pro
    • Extend all points.

    Against

    • Damn. I forgot about this. I guess you win :(
    • I take up the offer.
  20. 1370.

    The United States should abolish capital punishment

    For

    • Thank you to CentristX for choosing to debate against me for this topic, and I hope also that we do have a good debate here today. I will be accepting the Con's definition for capital punishment. Contention 1: Capital Punishment is Unjust In a perfectly just legal system, there…
    • Round 1: Acceptance Round 2: Opening Arguments Round 3: Rebuttals Round 4: Closing Arguments Time to Argue: 24 hours Argument Max: 10,000 characters Voting Period: 3 days In this debate, I as the PRO debater will be defending the resolution Resolved: In the United States,…

    Against

    • I accept JohnnyDoe's challenge and will argue as the Con of this debate.To clarify, I will be arguing against the Pro's resolution,that In the United States, capital punishment should not be outlawed, but rather, continued.For more clarification, the definition of Capital…
    • The Pro has forfeited Round 4. I have given my rebuttals for his introductory arguments and found that they also cover the rebuttals the Pro gave in Round 3, therefore I have nothing to counter-argue against this round.
  21. 1371.

    The death penalty is necessary

    For

    • The death penalty is necessary to keep crime in check. It also is the ideal punishment for someone who has murdered several people or murdered even one person in a cruel and unusual way. You might say that two wrongs don't make a right, but the death penalty would not count as…

    Against

    • Have you been punished by death?
    • :D
  22. 1372.

    The death penalty is reasonable upon admission of guilt

    For

    • I will first go over my opponents case which will also address mine id doing so. Good luck paramore102 :) First I will address my opponents copied "quote". MY OPPONENT: "Some people say that penalty is legalized murder because it is like "an eye for an eye". The difference…
    • I'm going to be standing on the affirmative side of this resolution. This means I support the death penalty for ONLY those who have admitted guilt. Unless their is like video taped evidence of the crime and the person wont admit, I don't think its right to kill prisoners who…

    Against

    • Some people say that penalty is legalized murder because it is like "an eye for an eye". The difference between punishment and the crime is that one is legalized and the other is not! People are more brutalized by what they see on T. V. daily. People are not brutalized by…
    • I am sorry for my bad quoting and source use. :[ "excessive bail shall not be required nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. " This is according to the eighth amendment "nor cruel or unusual punishment inflicted. " The sad thing is that we…
  23. 1373.

    Marriage should not be considered a civil right

    For

    • My arguments show that marriage is not a civil right based upon the ideas that my opponent sought to challenge in her second post, my second post consisted of counterpoints to her post, not counterpoints to the idea that marriage is a civil right because to ignore her points in…
    • My opponent's argument is convincing, she clearly posesses charisma, however her entire argument hinges on the idea that humanity has always been so squeamish about sex as it is today, oral sex and sticking it in her pooper weren't invented in the last thirty years, and specfic…

    Against

    • My opponent's argument does little to show that marriage is not, in fact, a civil right. His argument consisted of this: 1. The "current" social climate (presumably current refers only to modern, Westernized cultures) is more prudish than it used to be. 2. We should judge who…
    • I will be arguing that, with an anthropological perspective on marriage, marriage is a civil right. I thank my opponent for accepting this debate and for bringing his unique perspective to it (and a perspective I might agree with, once I hear more). On to my argument. The…
  24. 1374.

    Same-sex marriage should be legal

    For

    • Why is there so much discussion over the Bible? Its completely irrelevant. You want you church not to marry two gay people, go right ahead, but don't drag laws and the legality of marriage into the matter. The Bible also condones a lot of stuff we consider illegal and damns…
    • Under the 14th Amendment: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or…

    Against

    • No, gay marriage is wrong because the bible says so. I support gay marriage, but i'm just playing devils advocate.
    • marriage is defined as the bonding between man and woman, not man and man or woman and woman, another term of bonding can be created, with all the same benefits and drawbacks can be created. (i still support gay marriage though)
  25. 1375.

    Morality should be enforced by law

    For

    • Why morality should be legislated: Morality is belief in right and wrong, what SHOULD BE allowed or tolerated and what should not be, what is a liberty and what is not, as well as what is justice. This follows from the definition. If you believe something is "wrong" enough, you…
    • Thanks, Con. All I mean by "morality should be legislated" is that beliefs about what is right and wrong should be legislated. Why beliefs? Because, in the end, every other system of morality is, at best, the system that a certain group of people think accurately represent…

    Against

    • It's the last round, so I would like to address pro's case quickly and then summarize my case. I will be quoting and analyzing the flaws of some of pro's points. Pro-"If you believe something is "wrong" enough, you will want all practice of it outlawed." This is false. How…
    • Pro makes an interesting response to my argument. However, he makes some claims that I need to address. "All I mean by "morality should be legislated" is that beliefs about what is right and wrong should be legislated." This statement by pro clarifies nothing. Recall that pro…
  26. 1376.

    Age of consent laws should be uniform across the United States

    For

    • "According to the CDC report you referenced, Age of consent policies have yet to be determined as a factor in preventing or reducing teenage pregnancies:. . . Evidence suggests these declines are due to more teens abstaining from sexual activity. . . "It says right there that…
    • Opening Arguments As my opponent said, The age of consent governs the legal age one must be at in order to legally agree to have sex with another individual. Consent: give permission for something to happen. The point of the age of consent is outlined in the following…

    Against

    • Rejoinder #1 "It says right there that it is due to more abstinence. However, I will concede that it doesn't cite age of consent laws as the reason for that. " Then we can render your reference to teenage pregnancy as irrelevant since it does not inform the effect of which you…
    • Rebuttal "Obviously, Intercourse goes beyond simple pleasure. It can cause pregnancy, Which has multiple effects itself. For example, Consider this: 'In 2017, A total of 194, 377 babies were born to women aged 15"19 years. . . Only about 50% of teen mothers receive a high…
  27. 1377.

    The federal government should legalize marijuana

    For

    • I believe that marijuana should be legalized in the United States for 3 main reasons. 1. There is no reliable evidence of marijuana having negative effects on the body. 2. People have the right to "harm" themselves. 3. People will do it anyway. First off, I would like to say…

    Against

    • So...vote for me?
    • My opponent has failed to respond back. Remember to vote for me and give me my first win on Debate.org! Hopefully the readers will get a response from my opponent on the third round!
  28. 1378.

    The right to bear arms should be constitutionally protected

    For

    • Its obvious that you have not done your research. In 2008 and 2010 the supreme court issue two 2nd amendment decisions. In district of Columbia's vs Heller,554 U.S. 570 (2008) . The court ruled that the second amendment protects the individuals rite to posse's a firearm…
    • I will try to make this short and sweet. 1. 2nd amendment rites: We have the rite to own and carry guns (with a permit) and the 2nd amendment gives us that rite. If you were to take that rite away from the people what else would we let them take? 2. Safety and protection: in…

    Against

    • 1. The Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." You have just looked at the second piece of that, "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms…
    • I will debate you on all of the points you have listed. Please remember that as Pro, the burden of proof falls on you.
  29. 1379.

    Heroin should be made legal

    For

    • My opponent has argued that the only reason that I wish for Heroin to be legal is that I must be a user. First and foremost, even if I was a Heroin user, this is within itself not a valid point, as advocating for legislative change that benefits oneself is neither immoral nor…
    • Heroin, also known as diacetylmorphine , should be made legal and subject to standards of purity similar to most commercial food products and pharmaceuticals. In debates of legalizing drugs such as marijuana, both advocates and opponents refer to Heroin as the "hardest of…

    Against

    • That Would Never Happen It Kills People All The Time !!! the only reason you would be for the legalization of herion is if you do it!
    • heroin is bad it killed my father and many other people it makes an addiction that is not able to become overcame its so bad dont ever do heroin
  30. 1380.

    The death penalty is morally impermissible

    For

    • The likelihood of someone escaping federal prison is minuscule. The difference between life in prison and death cannot be justified solely based on this barely existent chance. The risk is so small that it cannot alone justify the death sentence, considering that there are so…
    • "By giving the criminal the death penalty, we deter future criminals, reducing the crime rate."According to studies, the death penalty is, at best, no more of a deterrent than a sentence of life in prison. [1] The opponent bears the burden of proving that it is, indeed, an…

    Against

    • Sweet. It doesn't matter if the risk of someone escaping from prison is minuscule, this is just one of many scenarios where that person would cause further harm. You say that this is outweighed by grieving families and chances for wrongful conviction, but your wrongful…
    • Alright cool addressing your life time penalty You cite an article about how death penalty is no more of a deterrent than a sentence of life in prison, however there is an existential risk here. No matter how minute it is, under a util framework we must reduce these risks.…
  31. 1381.

    American society has no moral authority to punish murder

    For

    • Virtually all of my contentions in this debate will rely upon the assumption that one has no right to punish another for a behavior which he or she also engages in. To do so would be hypocritical. Therefore, assuming that the above is true, to win this debate I must prove that…
    • Burden of proof is on Pro. In this usage, "society" refers to the Government of the United States. I am NOT talking about lynching here. Rules: No profanity, no sexually explicit language or material, no violent threats, no name calling, and no forfeiting without stating in…

    Against

    • Thank you for an interesting topic. For my constructive, I will focus on the philosophical grounding of the American government and demonstrate how, through the signing of the social contract as manifested through the Constitution, the government of the United States is…
    • I would like to begin with several observations before getting into the meat of this debate. You could buy every single one of Pro's arguments and still vote Con. Pro has failed to do two key things that must be accomplished before Pro can even think about meeting the BOP: 1)…
  32. 1382.

    Bullies should face jail time if their victims die by suicide

    For

    • First off I would like to state that the bully knows that teasing could damage someone, because of bullying campaigns. They would have to be stupid not to know that teasing could hurt someone, mentally. And the children who commit suicide might not have mental issues, I have…
    • I will be posting my arguement, and argueing con's. Ok, so the bullies go to school, and hear about suicide everyday. They have bullying campains all over the world, so you cannot argue that the bully had no knowledge of the consequences of his bullying. The bully knows that…

    Against

    • Ok to start of I would just like to address the point that bullies are not incredibly stupid. These are people who's main source of entertainment is annoying other people. Does that sound like someone intelligent to you? I have met clever bullies but they are very few and far…
    • Ok I will begin by replying to the pro's argument before going on to make another of my own. First to respond to the pro's argument it is no certain thing that bullies even know the effect of what they are doing. Yes if they are physically attacking this child they will…
  33. 1383.

    Governments should block websites that deny the Holocaust

    For

    • The freedom of Holocaust deniers to use to the internet legitimizes their organization and message in eyes of consumers
    • Governments should not allow forums for hate speech to flourish

    Against

    • Everyone has a right to freedom of expression
    • The organizers will go underground
  34. 1384.

    Gun control laws should be repealed and victimless crimes decriminalized

    For

    • I: "Prohibition effect" >>> each suceeding generation will conform more and more +++ This is a foolish, unproven assumption. I have given multiple examples of how prohibition fails. The Harrison Act passed in 1914 to lower and eventually stop drug use. The War on Drugs started…
    • I. Gun Control >>> Take note: Since my opponenet's resolution asserts two things with an AND [or a typo thereof], all I must do to negate it is negate ONE of these assertions. +++ :( That's just really not nice. II. Prostitution +++ My opponent presumes that prohibiting…

    Against

    • I'm experimenting. First, let me point out that I have a right to make new arguments in response only to new arguments my opponenent brought up last round, otherwise I must stick to my previous points. However, my opponent conceded a strange thing last round. "Banning video…
    • I must admit, the argument from my opponent was far more formidable than I was expecting. CON I: "Prohibition effect" Let's talk for a bit about the prohibition effect. This is the effect where illegalizing something increases its usage, and makes it more dangerous. Let's think…
  35. 1385.

    Legalizing same-sex marriage is bad public policy

    For

    • THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE I actually would agree with CON here in some sense. Marriage has never been a static institution that has stayed exactly the same throughout history. There has been many elements to it that have change and some of those aspects have already been mentioned…
    • THE PURPOSE OF CIVIL MARRIAGE The purpose of Civil marriage is to regulate the biological driven phenomena known as procreation that happens either by choice or by accident [1]. The traditional view of marriage is based on the "natural teleology of the body" where only a man…

    Against

    • In this round, I will refute my opponent's case in Rd. 2 by (1) exploring the curious divergence between Kenballer's sources and his arguments and (2) reestablishing the reasons why legalizing gay marriage is overall NOT a bad public policy.Some Issues That Must be Addressed:…
    • I will begin by making my case. In the following round, I will refute the case of my opponent. 1) Good and Bad Public Policy This is a debate about public policy, which may be defined as "the principle of law that holds no citizen can lawfully do that which has a tendency to be…
  36. 1386.

    Gay marriage should be legally allowed

    For

    • "Marriage" as a word may or may not come from religious origins, but in its current state, as recognized by the state, it is purely a legal contract. Any religion can still choose what groups qualify for marriage, but this debate is solely on whether GOVERNMENT should make such…
    • According to Merriam-Webster online: Marriage: 1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like…

    Against

    • I suppose you are right, and I apologize for my misinformation. The only reason that I had cited it, was because I can recall a few years back when this debate began to make headlines, that the only definition referred to traditional unions. It does greatly disturb me however,…
    • My arguement is not to prove that gays SHOULD NOT be allowed to live together, or function as a family unit. Instead, I beleive that there should be a different word for a "gay" marriage. The DEFINITION of the word marriage, REGARDLESS of WHERE YOU LOOK IT UP at, is "the social…
  37. 1387.

    The death penalty should be abolished

    For

    • I'm not okay with two things;1-In my opinion every person has a right to demand a second chance. No one can be perfect. And, as we, we should learn how to live with other people's mistakes.So if we don't give a chance to murderers who had been punished with death penalties, we…
    • Con is believing that some cases, the death penalty is justified. Firstly, I want to argue about this state and I'm truly against this opinion, however I honestly give my all respects to my opponent. The Turkish government have a prisoner named "Abdullah Ocalan"(1). He was/is…

    Against

    • To your first rebuttal- I agree with you general sentiment, but I am of the opinion that there are some mistakes too grave to forgive. I do not think money is more important than everyone's life, however I see money spent on keeping a murderer in prison for 10 years until he…
    • To your first argument: I can't really tell what point it is you are trying to make, but if an individual has committed acts so heinous that the population of an entire country cannot be impartial towards him, then the death penalty should be a pretty easy decision to arrive…
  38. 1388.

    Prostitution should be legalized

    For

    • First of all thank you for this debate. I disagree when you say that the legalizing of prostitution would raise the HIV/AIDS rate because if some people have this illness it is because the environment in which they work it is not safe, and the only thing we can do about this to…
    • Prostitution will never die, we all have to deal with this. Prostitution existed also during the Roman empire. I do not think this job will end, so why we do not try to do something good for that? the only thing we can do about prostitution is try to "make it better", I mean:…

    Against

    • Second, You don't get HIV from an environment. "HIV is a virus that infects people by getting inside their blood cells. To avoid getting HIV, you must prevent the blood, semen, vaginal fluids, or breast milk of someone who is infected from entering your body through your mouth,…
    • What you're saying is that if we legalize prostitution then the rate of homicide would drop? That makes little sense. Yes, I agree prostitution has been around for, well forever, but that doesn't mean we should legalize it. The legalizing of prostitution would raise the…
  39. 1389.

    The federal government should legalize medical marijuana

    For

    • AS AGREED UPON, MY OPPONENT AND I HAVE DECIDED TO KEEP THIS DEBATE AT A TIE DUE TO LACK OF TIME ON CONS SIDE. Feed back would be appreciated though. Just please, don't vote :)
    • I ask the voters not to hold ff against my opponent. This round calls for rebuttals, so that is what I will do now. Rebuttal #1 "Ease of Access" First, my opponent argues "Ease of Access". He basically argues that by legalizing Medical Marijuana, people will be able to have…

    Against

    • Unfortunately I'm out of time and will be gone Friday-Sunday, so I'm going to have to forfeit this round. I deeply appologize.
    • Contention 1: Ease of AccessIt is truely easy to acquire Medical Marijuana in America. For the number one example I'll give you our Bluest State in California as an example. Journalist Adam Brown reviewed California's law and revealed that in California and several other…
  40. 1390.

    Capital punishment should be outlawed

    For

    • Alas, my opponent could not be enticed to return even for baby mouse lemurs. Kindly vote accordingly.I leave you with something a little different. Nudibranchs! http://www.scubadiving.com...; />
    • Apparently kittens weren't cute enough to entice my opponent to return. Let's break out the big guns. I give you the mouse lemur.

    Against

    • I think that this be shouldn't be illegal if this is then criminals will have no fear of committing crimes.
  41. 1391.

    Homeowners should be allowed to use any necessary force against intruders

    For

    • I would like to point out that I am not insinuating that people should use 'nuclear forces' if/when their house is being invaded but just have the security that they can take force.'The one permanent emotion of the inferior man is fear - fear of the unknown, the complex, the…
    • Your house is said to be your temple and if you dont feel safe then your mental health will be effected.

    Against

    • I WIN YAYA Me
    • yay I WIN!
  42. 1392.

    The death penalty should be abolished

    For

    • 1. The death penalty is not in fact necessary - saying that it is necessary implies that it provides a service and/or solution that cannot otherwise be obtained. And that is patently false. Rather what the death penalty does is allow individuals to sate their need for…
    • Challenge accepted. Yay! My first debate!

    Against

    • For my final speech I would like to say it costs taxpayers $1.9-$3.6 million dollars a year to keep a murderers in prison for life why should they deserve to live after killing a child that couldn't defend himself or an elderly the death penalty is the best way our prisons are…
    • The death penalty is necessary, because some people are so vile they can never be in contact with society without harming it in some way. Truly evil people do exist and they harm others - sometimes killing or ruining lives through their actions. This is not something that…
  43. 1393.

    Profiting from the prison system should be criminalized

    For

    • Rebuttals 1) 'the government need the money, with out that money, we can't have anymore prisons. with out those prison, said, criminals will be out and free because there will not be enough jails. we have to pay for, worker, food, electricity, everything.'The government is the…
    • I think you are forgetting the purpose of the criminal justice system a little.The purpose of the criminal justice system of any country should be rehabilitation. If the criminals are not rehabilitated, they reoffend, and prisons do nothing but make them more adept criminals.

    Against

    • To restate my point and add new points. 1) the government need the money, with out that money, we can't have anymore prisons. with out those prison, said, criminals will be out and free because there will not be enough jails. we have to pay for, worker, food, electricity,…
    • The government needs the money that they get from the inmates.
  44. 1394.

    A federal shield law should protect journalists from disclosing sources

    For

    • Unfortunetly, my opponent FF, once again. :/ I would have loved to debate this with him
    • Since my opponent FF. I don't have anything I can post for an argument. We will see if he posts his argument in the next round.

    Against

    • SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME AND DEBATE THIS PLEASE The press plays an important role in our society, informing us about our government and our world. But as citizens, we also have important responsibilities to our government. For instance, with rare exception, all citizens have a…
  45. 1395.

    Citizens should have the right to own guns

    For

    • That is true, I guess, but look at it this way. For one, we cant completely ban guns right now, because there are hundreds of millions out there, and there is no way that people would give up their guns. Also, if no one had guns, a criminal could get them, shoot everyone he…
    • Ok, you say "if guns were illegal, it would keep guns out of the hands of criminals." Oh, really? That's why no one has any types of illegal drugs because they are illegal, right? If a criminal is crazy enough to shoot people, then nothing is gonna stop him from getting a gun,…

    Against

    • True, but a law against guns would make it more difficult for a "criminal" to get one. There is no getting around it, restricting civilian gun ownership will make it more difficult to gain access to guns.
    • I have agreed with you many times during this debate, why would I be too stubborn now? I do not agree with you. I do not feel that you have any knowledge of what shooters or would be shooters are thinking. You have no idea why or why not people have chosen to or not to go on a…
  46. 1396.

    The wall of separation between church and state is unconstitutional

    For

    • Con starts by letting me know how it is Constitutional.
    • There is a Constitutional difference between a State Government and a federal government. They were not hypocrites you just don't realize what 'establish' meant to the Founders. Maybe they were right and Hugo Black was wrong.

    Against

    • "There is a Constitutional difference between a State Government and a federal government. " - Not really, Both are a form of government. The only reason the state government exists is to give each state representation. - Plus the constitution implies that Neither government…
    • " If you are right then why did Jefferson go to Christian services that were held in the House of Representatives, Why has there been prayers led in Congress by mostly Christian denominations for over 200 years, Why did the Federal Government support Christian schools and…
  47. 1397.

    Gun control laws do not lower crime rates

    For

    • CON: "Not all mentally ill people can easily work their way around background checks like Lanza did. Background checks are a massive roadblock for mentally deranged people trying to get a gun, and to point to one instance and assume thats how ALL mentally ill people operate…
    • Good luck. First of all, I am already regretting that I was too specific in my debate topic. What I really wanted to do was talk about his gun control as a whole. Yet, none the less, here it goes. I am well aware of what his executive orders are. You make a very good and…

    Against

    • Executive orders regarding Background checks:" I was just making a point that a lot of people don't use legally means of obtaining a firearm, including the mentally ill."Of the 61 mass shootings in the US dating back to 1982, 49 of the shooters obtained their weapons legally...…
    • Executive Order Number 1:"We already have a background check system in place. Under the Brandy Handgun Violence Prevention Act. So, what "relevant data" is Obama talking about?"In the case of "Printz v United States", the Supreme Court ruled that the provision of the Brady Act…
  48. 1398.

    Private ownership of handguns should be banned

    For

    • Vote for the Affirmative to uphold the values presented by both teams. If you vote AFF, you will be upholding the value of preservation of life by supporting a case that would save 20,182 lives. You will also be upholding the NEG's value of reducing arbitrariness, because in…
    • They say "The negative's burden is to just disprove the affirmative in today's debate." I agree, but I will say that they have not met their burden, because they conceded all of the evidence I brought up in the 1AC. They have done nothing to disprove my case - they have only…

    Against

    • Vote with a die on your hand, not the issues that come to mind - vote from a die and vote just as arbitrarily as the affirmative's case is constructed.
    • Arbitrary action is not morally permissible - justice and all of its benefits are incompatible with arbitrary action (justice is giving each their due - this causes human life to exist because each is due their own life). The negative's burden is to just disprove the…
  49. 1399.

    The death penalty should remain legal

    For

    • yes i understand where you are coming from but before I start yes I did spell it wrong but I was tired when I started so now lets begin one I'm wondering where you are coming from on the whole race thing one, yes people still hate certain races and favor others but in the court…
    • The death penalty should be allowed because those who kill innocent people should pay for it with their own lives. The death penalty should be allowed as an acceptable punishment for those who kill innocent people. Taxpayers should not have to pay for a killer to spend the rest…

    Against

    • Although the judicial system is designed with several strategies to promote fairness (such as a panel of jurors who are interviewed beforehand and cut off from the rest of the world to ensure impartiality), it is not perfect. If you look at the statistics I presented, you will…
    • I've heard this argument many times before and I understand the sentiment that it is unfair if someone takes a life, they will live. I understand completely. As you put it, "those who kill innocent people should pay for it with their own lives." Now before I present my…
  50. 1400.

    Marijuana should not be classified as an illicit drug

    For

    • Many people think that marijuana is an illicit drug. In my debate I would like to argue that it is not but instead it is helpful in many ways. 1. People are led to believe that marijuana is more potent then it used to be. A U.S. government statistic that may influence beliefs…
    • since my opponent has failed and forfeited his last argument, I will make some new topics. 1. A smart reason why marijuana should be legal is that it would save our government lots of money. In the United States, all levels of government (federal, state, and local authorities)…

    Against

    • I would like to commence by pointing out that the terms of the resolution have not yet been declared. Therefore, before starting my arguments, I feel it necessary to define them. Here they are: Marijuana: the dried leaves and flowers of the hemp plant, used for its euphoric…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.