Discussly

Law Debate Topics — page 24

2,217 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 24 of 45
  1. 1151.

    Legally there should be only two genders, male and female

    For

    • if someone can claim they are a female and they are transgender then does that allow them to use a women's restroom? that will leave children exposed to pedophiles who are saying that they too are female but really they are perverted and want to spy on little kids. you were…
    • I don't believe in a god either just trying to help people see my point from another view and i'm not even talking about gays they don't try to be something they're not but trans i don't understand why you would need to be a girl you can just act ;like one and dress like one…

    Against

    • Part of my point is that: you are talking about "gender" but the concept you seem to mean is "biological sex". Biological Sex determines what set of genitals you have, and certain biological and physical characteristics. "Gender Identity" is what gender you assign to yourself.…
    • In the comments, you sound like you are trying to use religious views and etymology to solve this. 1. I don't believe in the existence of god, so let's keep that out of this debate. 2. Yes. The state of being male or female. But that definition does not say that it cannot…
  2. 1152.

    Hate-crime sentencing enhancements are unjust in the United States

    For

    • For the purpose of clarity, I'll start this round by restating my argument briefly. My argument is based on a syllogism: Major Premise: The action of punishing and suppressing freedom of speech and thought is unjust Minor Premise: Hate Crime Enhancements punish and suppress…
    • The current LD resolution. Come one, come all, and debate me! Because hate crime enhancements violate free speech, I affirm the resolution, Resolved: Hate crime enhancements are unjust in the United States. The United States Sentencing Guidelines 3A1.1.(a) currently sets down…

    Against

    • I wont debate this issue any further as my opponent hasn't given a new argument. -------------------
    • Ok, let's start from the top of my opponent's argument: "My argument is based on a syllogism: Major Premise: The action of punishing and suppressing freedom of speech and thought is unjust Minor Premise: Hate Crime Enhancements punish and suppress freedom of speech and thought.…
  3. 1153.

    Prostitution should be legalized in the United States

    For

    • I would like to introduce my point of view by first discussing the so-called "evils" of prostitution. Prostitution now, as ever, is not an uncommon thing in the world, particularly in the poorer regions of the world. Even the United States, with its amazingly high standard of…
    • First: "Do you think that the government will seriously check and test these girls after every day, week, or even month for STDS? Legalization fundamentally increases the risk of getting aids because more individuals visit these sites (explained in Contention 1), and the…

    Against

    • I sincerely apologize for the round that I wasted by forfeit, due to finals and holiday obligations I had little time to write an adequate rebuttal. I commend my opponent for a well executed debate, and am sorry if he feels that he has wasted his time due to my conspicuous…
    • I will go Neg ---|>Aff 1.Exacerbation of the Problem My opponent and I agree on one thing, the obvious problems of prostitution. Prostitutes since the commencement of the profession have consistantly suffered from the effects of horrible psychological detriment; not to mention…
  4. 1154.

    Minors should require parental consent for abortion

    For

    • I do not believe the age group matters when it comes to a life changing and life taking decision. I believe that the decision of abortion is equal to the right to drink. Also in many states in able to you to be seen alone at a clinic or an appt the child has to be at least 18…
    • I do believe that a minor should need consent for an abortion. Although it is the child's body, I believe that support from a parent is needed. Some children, young adults, and teenagers tend to be immature when they are pregnant and tend to make immature and irresponsible…

    Against

    • All forms of birth control are available to all women in America at least the age of 18. The procedure of having an abortion is another form of an option for birth control for women. Abortions are now very safe and low risk procedures. Patients are able to go home the same day…
    • During this argument we are talking about minors. I will personally focus more on the teenage age group (ages 15 - 17) for the sake of my argument. Now I do believe that teenagers should have the ability to have an abortion without parental consent. The parent should be aware…
  5. 1155.

    Denial of the Holocaust should be banned by law

    For

    • Pretty self explanatory debate. Round one will be acceptance only, rounds 2-4 will be for arguments.

    Against

    • Thus ends the great anticipation of the completion of each forfeited round.
    • Ok, here's a quick argument: Free speach is a fundemental human right. Also, how else wil you know who the racist Nazi's are?
  6. 1156.

    Banning guns would not reduce crime in America

    For

    • Banning guns will not stop crime in America. Change my mind
    • But guns are saving MILLIONS a year. Again you haven"t respond to my Study that showed guns stop anywhere from 500,000 to 2,000,000 crimes EVERY YEAR! At the time when the founding father wrote the Second Ammendment when there were guns like the Belton Flintlock, Giradoni Air…

    Against

    • Banning Guns Will drastically Reduce Crime In 2015, 13,286 Americans were injured by guns. 26,819 were killed. Guns are one of the top weapons of choice for crime in America. They are favoured over knives and blunt objects in situations like armed robbery, muggings, murder and…
    • Although you are correct when you say that guns prevent some amount of crime, that doesn't mean that running around arming citizens is going to miraculously solve everything. Sure, if every Jewish person was armed with a gun during the Holocaust, then maybe more lives would…
  7. 1157.

    The death penalty should be abolished

    For

    • I unfortunatley have had a lot come up in these past few days. I will be conceding this rebuttal round due to big assignments for finals. I know his may result in loss of the debate. I would plea to my opponent to cut the debate off last round, but that wouldn't be fair to him.…
    • Contention 1: Irreversible Mistakes His 1st response: Chance of killing negligible because of technology advances. Issue: Technology doesn't convict people of crimes; a jury of peers takes care of that. They accomplish this by hearing the evidence and seeing the evidence, and…

    Against

    • I have enjoyed it :D We can debate again in the future
    • Pro Case C1: Irreversible Mistakes First, my opponent completely misunderstands my argument about technological advances. Taking and utilizing DNA samples is not done by the defense team – it is done by the police force which then submits its evidence to the court. It doesn't…
  8. 1158.

    Flag burning should be protected as free speech

    For

    • Your argument is essentially that it is against my citizenly duty to burn the flag. You also agree that flag burning is a matter of freedom of speech and should be regarded as such. You give me no reason that it should be against the law or any reason why the law should be…
    • People should be allowed to burn the flag. It is a statement of free speech (symbolic) and protest. Both of which are constitutionally protected. I think the act is disfavorable. That is to say I don't personally agree with it. But, it is important to defend civil liberties…

    Against

    • If I object to the American government entering Iraq, I could shoot a federal agent as a powerful message of protest. Or better yet, I could write an article in the paper urging Americans to overthrow the current regime. Both of these, like flag burning, are powerful messages.…
    • Freedom of speech is an important civil liberty that needs protection. That being said, not all "speech" falls under its umbrella protection. Now I'm not going to argue whether or not flag burning is constitutionally protected. The Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter on that…
  9. 1159.

    The United States should abolish the death penalty

    For

    • I don't know why my graphs didn't load, but the death penalty should still be abolished. I will restate my argument.http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org...^ Go to the last graph. Then you can see that 43% of the people who are white are going to be executed. 41 percent of the people…
    • As my position say, the United States should abolish the death penalty.Racism:My opponent has showed a graph saying that only 56% of whites and 35% of African Americans where put to death by the death penalty.Now let's look at the current death row. As you can see, the…

    Against

    • I am still forced to extend C2. ~refutations~R1: R1: Racism ----> Your graph didn't work----> Present the arguments dont just link them, neither one of the graphs worked. Therefore no argument.----> Only 2% of white murderers and 2.5% of black ones get executed. This shows its…
    • Extend arguments.~Racism~---> My opponent claims that the DP is racist. Here is a graph: see #1 source. This shows the majority of people executed are white, this makes sense though as they are the majority. In the current people on death row, 44% are white, 41% are african…
  10. 1160.

    Gay marriage should stay legal in all 50 states

    For

    • How did I end it? You broke a rule which I stated in the 1st round.
    • What it was a clear violation of rules. The voters will vote for me since you broke a rule

    Against

    • Sure they can do that. Let's see if they would even care. If I am wrong oh well. You didn't win the debate, you ended it. So CONGRATS!
    • Nah.. I won't forfeit. I would prefer to see you do it.
  11. 1161.

    Drugs should remain illegal

    For

    • You haven't reputed M'kay. Drugs are bad M'kay. Explain why they aren't M'kay.
    • Drugs are bad, M'kay.

    Against

    • First of all, "Drugs are bad" is an opinion, not an argument. You cannot win an argument by stating your opinion. Second, that statement has nothing to do with the resolution, "Drugs should stay illegal". My opponent has trolled this entire debate and has not made a single…
    • Pro has yet to fulfill the burden of proof. Until this happens, I have nothing to rebut.
  12. 1162.

    Places allowing same-sex marriage must recognize other marriage forms

    For

    • Again, my opponent has forfeited his round. You have no option other than voting for the PRO side of this debate. Thank you for your time.
    • This is twice in which my opponent could not meet the time requirement; once, is acceptable. Twice just inhibits from an educational debate. Thank you.

    Against

    • Alright then. "These are pretty clear signs of consent; if they're not present, then you can generally agree that the animal has no real problem with it." Consent implies approval. Just because you don't have an opinion on something doesn't mean you approve of something. Shoot…
    • Though I don't particularly like any of these types of marriages, this proves to be an interesting topic. Since I'm con, I will prove that in places where homosexuality IS permitted, other types of marriage should NOT be permitted (besides man woman marriage of course. Don't…
  13. 1163.

    The United States should abolish the death penalty

    For

    • Thank you, once again for your arguments." kohai better not forfeit my debate with him."I am sorry but I have to forfeit(SORRY, I was too tempted!)RC1) As I proved, the DP also takes inoccent lives!RSPA) I wish to direct your attention to the source that my opponent used.…
    • Should the United States abolish the death penalty? That is the question I wish to answer in this debate. Note, from hereafter, Death Penalty will be abbreviated as "DP. "I wish my opponent the best of luck. *handshake*Contention 1: Execution is inhuman! C1.1) The Questionabl…

    Against

    • Also here's a funny/cute video: . http://www.youtube.com...
    • First, I will refute kohai's arguments. If I have characters remaining, I will defend my own.=The Resolution=Kohai has defined (and I agree with), abolish to mean to do away with. So if I can show that in general, we ought not abolish the death penalty, you vote Con. If I give…
  14. 1164.

    Sane, law-abiding citizens should have the right to bear arms

    For

    • Resolved- All legally and clinically sane citizens should have the right to keep and bear arms. First of all, let me thank my opponent for accepting this debate, if in fact he does accept it. The right to keep and bear arms is a right given by birth, not only a right protected…
    • My opponent, again, dedicates an entire paragraph to the "Orange Revolution", and still fails to prove it's relevance to this discussion. This debate is not about whether or not "change can be brought about peacefully". He has failed to prove any parallels between the Orange…

    Against

    • My opponent has provided a very strong argument. I would like to reiterate the following 1) Misery is not quantifiable by numbers or words. The mere fact that there is "gun violence" and "death by firearms" is proof that guns do bring misery to the human race. I find it…
    • Firstly I would like to address my opponent's contention that the 'Orange Revolution' was the weakest example of government tyranny and would like to rebut that argument by stating that the example was by no means an argument of government tyranny but was merely an a fitting…
  15. 1165.

    The death penalty should be abolished

    For

    • you go first please.

    Against

    • Clearly I have won this debate. He has not posted anything.
    • Everything I have said follows on.
  16. 1166.

    Amanda Knox was at least partly involved in Meredith Kercher's murder

    For

    • 1. That is not the only evidence she was involved in the murder. 2. There was a break in staged and it is believed very likely Amanda Knox did it. 3. There's plenty of circumstancial evidence Amanda Knox was involved so she probably was. This is clearly a very strong case…
    • 1. Lack of DNA evidence in the murder room did not show Knox was innocent to being party to the murder. Meredith's blood was mixed with Knox's DNA in the bathroom and in Filomena's room. Also, there was a clean up the next day, during which DNA evidence was selectively removed.…

    Against

    • Summary of debate, My opponent has provided weak circumstantial evidence. My opponent has asserted that if someone can't be proven innocent then they are in fact guilty. This is a dangerous assumption that could potentially make anyone a criminal. My opponent has simply not…
    • I'm going to summarize my opponents arguments that Amanda was somehow involved in meridith's murder and then address her/his points one by one. The case against Amanda Knox, 1. She is a cold hearted liar therefore she was involved in the murder of Meredith. 2. There was a break…
  17. 1167.

    Secular arguments can justify banning same-sex marriage

    For

    • Hello thank you for accepting.The only evidence have ever been presented with for why gay marriage should be illegal has come with a religious bias of some sort. gay and lesbians are perfectly happy tax paying members of society and deserve the same legal rights that any loving…
    • I believe there is no secular argument for a ban on gay marriage.The purpose of this debate is to decide if gay marriage (In the US) has any reason being banned using only secular agreements. There are 3 rounds of debate.Rounds:(1) Acceptance(2) Opening statements(3)…

    Against

    • I accept, and dedicate this debate to 16kadams.
    • "This is the last round." - Captain ObviousLet's rebuttal this! My ace in the hole is the argument from semantics, which was dropped.Rebuttals:Pro writes "Not everyone is being treated equal. Heterosexuals can marry the people they find sexually attractive homosexuals can not.…
  18. 1168.

    Gun bans and confiscation should replace the outdated Second Amendment

    For

    • I wrote a rebuttal that was nice said exactly what I wanted to say. Then my Open Office Crashed. It will not let me reinstall. I got a copy of MS Word but it will not read the the file. :( All that made me late for my round. I am not going to rewite all of it. My opponent has…
    • In many ways the 2nd Amendment is outdated. While I would concede that our founding fathers would not be in favor of an all out ban on all fire arms they would be in favor of a ban of some types of fire arms. I will do my best to take you back in to the mind set of our founding…

    Against

    • Has my opponent forfeited? Or needs more time for a counter argument?
    • "That school children would take military style weapons to school and shoot there class mates. " Assault Rifle: Defined- a military rifle capable of both automatic and semiautomatic fire, utilizing an intermediate-power cartridge. Style: Defined- A particular kind, sort, or…
  19. 1169.

    Victims of extended abuse should be allowed to use deadly force

    For

    • Ok my opponent proceeds to go back to murder over and over again but what my opponent is not saying is the fact that most abuse victims lives are put in to danger every time they are attacked, it is unfair for my opponent to say well murder is wrong when the victim's life is…
    • Well yes murder is wrong, but let's say your sister is being abused by her spouse? Are you telling that you would tell her not to defend herself? Let me also pont out that some males/females whom are abusing there spouse will beat in to there mind they are useless and no one…

    Against

    • My opponent continues to try and make this point of murder look irrelevant, even though she is trying to legalize murder by upholding this resolution. So let's look at what happens to this murderer after they kill their abuser. They live the rest of their lives in prison. And…
    • My opponent is seeing the radical as the only option available to victims of abuse. Yes, every human being has a right to self defense. However, this does not give every human a right to take another human's life. Yes, many victims of abuse feel worthless. And of course they…
  20. 1170.

    Police who shoot unarmed civilians should give public video interviews

    For

    • i give up. the level of incomprehension is too high. i didn't even read half of your response. sorry - i give up.
    • i have answered chronologically without quotes. i can go back and put in your quotes if this makes it too hard for you, but i think scrolling my rebuttal in a browser window next to your first response should be sufficient. if i need to provide proof that there are too many…

    Against

    • My opponent has given up.
    • Hello again. I'll jump straight into my rebuttal.if i need to provide proof that there are too many killing of unarmed, unthreatening civilians by law enforcement, i worry for this debate. it's such a simple, basic fact that there are tons of videos online of cops shooting…
  21. 1171.

    Semi-automatic guns should be restricted like automatic weapons

    For

    • It is not unconstitutional to regualte fully automatic weapons, This is the reason full auto weapons are rarely used in crimes they are restricted. Restrict semi automatic weapons in the same way and you will find a similar result
    • My constitutional solution would allow respsible people to own these weapons after proper back round checks, The way we do this is to simply reclassify all semi automatic weapons into the category destructive weapons and fully automatic weapns are oh and handguns too

    Against

    • I agree with the first part, But is labeling guns as killing machines neccesary
    • To elaborate more on Shooting test Written test Mental Health Screening Reason for purchase Family interviews
  22. 1172.

    Citizens should be allowed to own firearms

    For

    • Never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down!
    • Thanks Con. ==Idealism==Cons position is invalid because he hasn't defended any theoretical ideal. There are literally dozens of political ideologies conservatives, liberals, communists, socialists, anarchists, objectivists, libertarians, anarchists, ect. that all have a…

    Against

    • To clarify the context of my arguments, look to my opponents framework. "The resolution applies generally across all human societies, not US specific, however since most raw data available is from the United States it's likely that the debate will center mostly around this…
    • I accept the terms and present a definition for the word should. should - indicating a desirable or expected state Looking forward to a good debate.
  23. 1173.

    The death penalty is a justified form of punishment

    For

    • look your skills surpass mine
    • u win

    Against

    • Just to clarify my 'cool' was sarcastic. I genuinely think it's cool that you just balls'd up like that.
    • Cool.
  24. 1174.

    Recreational marijuana should be legal in all 50 states

    For

    • Rebuttal 1... I just said a) marijuana possession rates would go down (obviously) because it would be legal. b) laws for marijuana possession in states that allow it are very strict, helping police to enforce them. Argument 2... The legal sale of Marijuana would generate tax…
    • The first argument to our debate is the fact that many marijuana arrests are made unjustly and the criminalization of marijuana possession wastes law enforcement resources that could be used to fight violent crime. According to a report released by the Drug Policy Alliance in…

    Against

    • Rebuttal 1My opponet says that it will lower crime, and boost the economy, that's the biggest load of BS I have ever heard. First regarding crime. Just because you legalize something won't lower crime. All you are doing is not calling it a crime anymore. We might as well…
    • Legalizing marijuana will make crime rates much much worse kids will be growing it asking friends or strangers for it more then they do now yes Marijuana may make good money but look at the risks that follows more crime rates kids getting a hold of this drug. Marijuana should…
  25. 1175.

    Capital punishment is justifiable

    For

    • This week's debate has boiled down to 2 main voting issues, the 3 motions I've set forth and the reliability of information/rebuttals given. Given the information that my opponent & I have presented, I will go over these and give 2 main reasons why a vote for Pro in this debate…
    • On to the debating. .I'd like to note that my arguments are not to justify capital punishment as a whole. In fact, I believe the system, as most states have it, is inherently flawed, can be discriminatory, and has to high of a risk of killing innocents. However, that is…

    Against

    • There are many points which my opponent has raised in his counter-arguments, most of which I disagree with; therefore, for the sake of clarity, I will be quoting his statements in bold, and subsequently responding to them piece by piece.Rebutting Counter-Argument #1:"My…
    • After having read and considered his arguments, I find myself thoroughly impressed; his formidably is blatantly evident. Hopefully I can prove to be just as persuasive in my rebuttals. My opponent has asserted that three key issues must be considered when determining the…
  26. 1176.

    The United States should abolish capital punishment

    For

    • First against the facts on the cost of the death penalty he states I get most of my evidence form amnestyusa. org which clearly not true if you are to read through my MSNBC article which he has no argument against the validity of the website or the article. Then he says…
    • Now I will defend my points against the attacks he made against them. Against my argument that the costs of the death penalty are simply too much he brings up that this is simply not true. He brings up how studies that have been used in the past did not have complete data…

    Against

    • While my opponent makes some good arguments, I feel I must defend some of my previously stated arguments. He claims that, "This proves my point more that we should abolish the death penalty sense getting someone to death row is so costly because of the lengthy appeals process…
    • I agree with the definitions given, and will start with my rebuttals. My opponent starts by basically saying the death penalty costs taxpayers more than a life sentence without possibility of parole. While this would be a great argument, it simply is not fact. The fact is that…
  27. 1177.

    All drugs should be legal for adults

    For

    • i ask you the voters to vote for me because my enemy obviously doesnt want to follow through with the debate, that we'd agreed upon while talking on aim instant messager
    • i am going to omit this round in order to continue the debate........................................................the periods are to meet the reqyuirement.............................................................................

    Against

    • Sorry, i just don't feel like debating on this issue, and i told you that on IM.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  28. 1178.

    France's ban on face-covering veils should be enforced without religious bias

    For

    • The veils are worn only by the Muslim women on a daily basis : Since only the Muslim women wear a full face veil as a compulsion on a daily basis, any ban on it would affect these women the most. It will be religious prejudice on any count. " This is true, the law was clearly…
    • This week the French ban on wearing veils in public came into force and already Muslim women have been arrested for not uncovering their faces, perhaps so that lecherous Gallic kafirs can drool over the sight of their bare countenances and, possibly, undress them with their…

    Against

    • //This is true, the law was clearly designed as a tool to persecute the sizable Muslim minority in France. However, this only reinforces my argument: the high-profile detention of Christian brides under the law would heighten the absurdity of the legislation.// But this wasn't…
    • My position would be that it is impossible to impose a ban on wearing veils without religious prejudice. I would like to provide some definitions in the beginning. Prejudice: 1. An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.…
  29. 1179.

    Same-sex marriage should be legal everywhere

    For

    • This is a debate over whether or not Gay Marriage should be legal in the United States. My position is that Gay Marriage should be legal. I will let my opponent start the debate with their arguments.
    • I would like to protest my opponent's idea that marriage is only about procreation. What about infertile couples? What about couples who wish to remain childfree? If they can marry, why not the LGBT community, too? My oppeonent states "Marriage in essence was an institution to…

    Against

    • Thank you for the topic. And I'll be the con for the Gay Marriage Legalization. And so I stand on grounds that disagree with the legalization of gay marriage. Of course, I won't state my personal beliefs. I may or may not be a devil's advocate. Same sex marriage. Well, since…
    • For example, racism against blacks has diminished since the 1950's. The meaning of black changed from "second-class citizens" to "people just like us".I'd like to state, meaning of 'second class citizen' was against the constitution in the first place. Something that should've…
  30. 1180.

    Automatic weapons should be legal for civilians

    For

    • My opponent said that by legalizing automatic weapons they would become more availbale to criminals. I concur to an extent this may be true however they will also allow citizens to have more protection. My opponent suggests that keeping them illegal will keep them in low…
    • My opponent's first statment was that if we were to ban cars, baseball bats, knifes, and rocks it would be an inconvienice while banning guns would be fine because they were desighned soley to harm people. However my opponent is wrong. Guns are also used in hunting and…

    Against

    • I feel like I have effectively proved that the legalization of automatic weapons would make them more available for criminals (that point was just conceded), so I will address your other arguments here. You said that "in San Francisco in Richmond alone someone is shot ever[y] 2…
    • First off, I'd like to say that you are correct about the discussion getting off topic and I will be sure to stick to the resolution of automatic weapons being legal rather than all weapons. Your main argument relies on the supposed need to protect yourself against armed…
  31. 1181.

    Waterboarding should be legal in the United States

    For

    • Waterboarding is used to collect life-saving informationConsider the following hypothetical: A nuclear weapon goes missing in Pakistan. The trail leads to New York City, and coded e-mails implicate a certain Pakistani national, identified as a member of al Qaeda, as…
    • 1: Waterboarding is used to collect life-saving information All of my opponents arguments are claims that without absolute certainty, no harsh interrogation is justified. Certainty is never used as a legal standard, because certainty is never attainable. As one academic put it,…

    Against

    • Re: 1: My argument regarding "certainty" was strictly in regards to the "ticking time bomb" scenario, which is the topic for the opponent's first argument. It was solely to convey the idea that such a hypothetical scenario is extremely improbable. Solely for the sake of…
    • Re: 1: The point I tried to make was this: It is nearly impossible that intelligence would lead to the certainty of the existence of a "ticking time-bomb" (in the ticking time-bomb scenario that the opponent proposed in his initial first argument.) The exact nature of the bomb,…
  32. 1182.

    Marijuana should be legalized across all fifty US states

    For

    • You say that I'm pathetic, when in reality you fail to even win, or tie, most of your debates. You clearly fail to understand a debate, which is why I think it's easy to determine the winner voters. This was more of a "Troll Debate", presented by my opponent, which breaks the…
    • I will not argue, until my opponent does.

    Against

    • Go kill yourself you rapist coward.
    • You're pathetic. "I know how to handle trolls." Oh please. Is that like the same way you know how to handle a man's cock? But what else could I expect from someone who's favourite movie is Stardust. Oh, and I see you like Doctor Who as well. How typical. Why don't you go off in…
  33. 1183.

    Gun control laws should be strengthened

    For

    • I am disappointed that my opponent forfeited the previous round - I hope this reflects how much he feels about his arguments. May the best debator win, may the voting begin.
    • As you can probably guess by the username and vibrant profile picture - I am a Briton. In the United Kingdom, most guns are banned and to own a hunting rifle one requires a gun licence which is extremely difficult to earn and requires extensive background checks. In the United…

    Against

    • In America, many people in the government are attempting to pass laws pertaining to the usage of guns. They include rules that restrict the everyday usage of guns, effectively limiting the safety and protection that they can give us. Some of these gun control laws should not be…
    • Hello. In our society, many people wish to implement stricter gun control laws in our society. I am against the proposals, and am taking the con side of this argument.The link we will be using is here.http://www.feinstein.senate.gov...This is a very confusing legal document, so…
  34. 1184.

    Governments should implement complete gun control

    For

    • more guns correlates with more homicidehttp://www.amjmed.com...i can find plenty more of those types of articles. so shouldn't we at least consider getting rid of guns, if we could reduce murders by say eighty percent? not everyone will stop at nothing to get a gun. most people…
    • even strict gun control countries allow exceptions for hunting. no reason we can't too. australia is pretty low on the count. the USA is over four times worse just by comparison. australia is pretty far down the list. https://en.wikipedia.org...;it is ashame we can't protect…

    Against

    • I disagree that we could reduce murders by 80 percent, maybe 20 percent but not 80. Guns are not the only way to commit homicide. Also (hypothetical) if a man broke into my house with an illegally obtained firearm and he was intending to kill me, how could I defend myself?…
    • Complete gun control. A good idea? I don't think so, telling people that they can't own or use guns will not lower the crime rate but raise it because there is no doubt that criminals will illegally obtain any gun they can get their hands on. Complete gun control only affects…
  35. 1185.

    Businesses should be allowed to refuse services for same-sex weddings

    For

    • My reason for my side of the debate was sparked by a particular example. I came across an ad that featured a florist's experience. She had a frequent customer who she knew to be gay and they had a good relationship and she genuinely seemed to like him. He was aware of her…
    • To clarify, I don't believe that people should be allowed to discriminate based on sexual orientation alone. So if a gay person wanted flowers for their home or to buy for their mother or some other reason, I don't think they should be able to discriminate. However, if the…

    Against

    • 1. "If the service being requested is for an event that is dirctly against the businessman's beliefs, they should have the right to refuse." If I buy something from a business, why would I even need to inform them of the event involved? You're limiting the freedoms of the…
    • Happy to think with you today. I took a glance at some of your other arguments and am happy to say I think you're an honest debater and would be happy to debate you more if you enjoy how this goes. There's a common misconception with people that the gay wedding flowers/cake…
  36. 1186.

    Civilians should be allowed to own firearms in the United States

    For

    • I guess I win. Guns are necessary to maintain a free society. That's why it's the 2nd Amendment, not the 34th.
    • The 2nd Amendment allows citizens the right to bear arms.

    Against

    • I think that guns should be allowed because sometimes shooting happens like in school and then teachers call 911 but it's to late when they come if guns are allowed the schools should have metal detectors so they could check if somebody brought something dangerous to school…
  37. 1187.

    US abortion law should remain unchanged

    For

    • //Are you saying that in having the (one) child, it would kill both the parents (two)? That is nonsensical.// I never said or implied that having a child is going to kill both parents. You obviously need to read it again. //it would seem as though he agrees with me that life…
    • Thank you for clarifying what we are debating about. My opponent's argument is that a human being should not be killed at any stage in his/her life. But let me start off by giving a hypothetical scenario. let's say there is a train coming down the track that is about to hit two…

    Against

    • >>I never said or implied that having a child is going to kill both parents. You obviously need to read it again.<< I was taking a 'stab in the dark' as to what your "hypothetical scenario" was meaning to convey. You never told me what it meant. You told me to keep the scenario…
    • To answer my opponents first question, I would rather warn the people to get off the damn tracks. But in all seriousness, I would agree with killing one to save the two. I wonder what this is meaning to convey? Are you saying that in having the (one) child, it would kill both…
  38. 1188.

    The US federal government should substantially curtail domestic surveillance

    For

    • Hello,I am extremely disapointed to state that I cannot postmy arguments for this round. This past week I got sick. Please go ahead and post your arguments and I will respond to them as normal. Apologies to All
    • Hello Esteemed Debaters and Observers Alike,My name is arrowjaw, and today I am presenting a debate topic I wish to argue with an opponent. This debate has been created in all seriousness and I expect it to be argued thus. Please only accept this debate if you wish to debate…

    Against

    • promises of answer my arguments never fulfilled. Vote for me
    • vote for me
  39. 1189.

    Gun laws should be stricter

    For

    • "The fact that you claim that making a firearm is any harder then making moonshine is a bit of an uneducated statement. The operation of distilling whiskey requires thousands of dollars in equipment as does gunmaking. You can cut costs in gunsmithing similar to the way you can…
    • "Since you have left the actual terms for winning said argument completely open by not specifying any sort of terms that i need to prove wrong."I will be arguing that more gun restriction will help prevent crime."Please specify what exactly you want done about gun laws your…

    Against

    • It's much harder to make a firearm. You can grow marijuana and make moonshine from what's natural in the earth. Not with firearms. You must admit, if marijuana were legal, more people would be doing it. The fact that you claim that making a firearm is any harder then making…
    • Since you have left the actual terms for winning said argument completely open by not specifying any sort of terms that i need to prove wrong. I will start my argument by stating that a gun is a mere tool like a hammer. A good doesn't kill people by itself just like a hammer…
  40. 1190.

    Guns should be made illegal

    For

    • You ask how we will make guns illegal? Simple, Get rid of the 300 year old second amendment. When that amendment and constitution were written was in the 1700. It's time to wake up and move into this century. We don't have wild posse riding into town, We don't have scalping…
    • I am so tired of hearing from these red neck, Military, Waco Texas, NRA loving gun nuts who believe in some ancient parchment the Constitution and believe they need guns, It's sad stories like this that always amaze me why people would still want to have a gun. In a civilized…

    Against

    • Pro forfeited a round, So I extend my arguments from the previous.
    • "You ask how we will make guns illegal? Simple, Get rid of the 300 year old second amendment. " Congress has not only democrats but also republicans. In order for a law to be made or repealed, One must first send an idea for a new law to Congress. Next, Congress must turn the…
  41. 1191.

    All states should prohibit firing employees for their sexual orientation

    For

    • Okay I was actually not expecting you to agree with me on anything. But yeah, and I especially like what you said about even if it's a choice, it's okay, because people tend to bash on sexual experimentation often. And that's also good, most of that second paragraph. But…
    • Okay, thanks for accepting, let's get started :) First of all, being gay is not "unnatural". In fact, homosexuality is present in over 450 different species. If you think that it's unnatural, just keep your opinion to yourself and don't try to destroy other people's happiness.…

    Against

    • It's funny, I agree with the overwhelming majority of what you said. Homosexuality is a trait that is common in species from penguins To elephants to humans. And even if it is a "choice" the people have the right to engage in any kind of consensual relationship or sexual…
    • I await your response.
  42. 1192.

    Child sexual abusers should face the death penalty

    For

    • Do you really not know if I concede based on what you have read so far? (25 characterts) (25 characters)
    • UHH I accidently entered this debate in twice, I left the word "BE" out of the title and tried to correct it. you win. I am debating on the other one. Thanks for playing, Please drive through.

    Against

    • My opponent does not address my argument and suggest that he is conceding this debate in round 2. Anyway, as for that extra clarification I said I would deliver, I suppose I will provide it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>…
    • Greetings. I'd like to thank my opponent for starting this debate. For those not familiar with my understanding of debate, you're free to read my profile. With that said, let us proceed: The information in my opponent's opening argument is quite brief. All he says is the child…
  43. 1193.

    Singapore's drug policy is at least as good as Portugal's

    For

    • This is a debate about two of the most radically different drug policies currently in place. Singapore famously has no tolerance for drugs and imposes the death penalty for possession of anything in "trafficking amounts. " In addition, "The possession, consumption,…

    Against

    • Extend.
    • My argument will basically be that there's a presumption in favor of freedom to do things that don't directly harm or interfere with the liberty of others. This includes drug use. Therefore the optimal point of government intervention in people's decision whether or not to…
  44. 1194.

    Gay marriage should not be banned

    For

    • Red is blue. Red is blue. Red is blue. Now look around. Is everything that was red now blue? I didn't think so. Saying it over and over again doesn't make it true. "All your arguments have an inherent flaw and that's that they assume homosexual marriages will always be small in…
    • "1. Like every other species on this planet, human beings needs to follow reproduction system rules -- sexual intercourse between a male and a female is a necessary (may not be sufficient though) condition to sustain our species on this planet. Gay (or lesbian) marriages will…

    Against

    • All your arguments have an inherent flaw and that's that they assume homosexual marriages will always be small in percentage compared to heterosexual marriage and so wouldn't disturb society at large. In fact, this assumption itself indicates that you consider this type of…
    • I completely disagree with Pro's argument here (well, that's why I am Con I guess :P) Alright, If we think about gay marriages "logically" then it should indeed be banned. Lets go to the basics of marriage system -- why marriage system exist in the first place? 1. Like every…
  45. 1195.

    US citizens should not have the right to bear arms

    For

    • To be honest, I am confused. My opponent is arguing for my points, and seems to be agreeing with my contention completely. Not one attempt has been made to refute any of my points I initially set out. Please note that as I set out in the first round, the burden carried by CON…
    • ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "My Response: ok, lets first off and define the difference between a right and privilege. [Definition - Right] 1. A legal or moral entitlement [Definition - Privilege] 1. a special advantage or immunity or…

    Against

    • There is obviously a disconnect. I really believed that my opponent was joking about the bear arms idea. However, those arguments should not be looked at for these reasons: 1) The clause specifically has a compound verb, i.e. to KEEP and bear arms. If you use my opponents logic…
    • "While the wording may be confusing, upon closer inspection, the word 'bear' appears to be a verb and not a noun. Thus, the right to bear arms is a privilege and not a right." My Response: My opponent asked for an example about the noun/verb controversy. "upon closer…
  46. 1196.

    Prostitution should be legalized

    For

    • My opponent has tried to harm my business. Whatever happened to him was purely coincidental and not in any way related to that. I'm gonna give my hoes some extra crack today. In celebration of my opponent choosing to refrain from attacking my business model.
    • My arguments about this proposal harming my coke habit and my hoes, has wen't unrefuted. Arguments extended.

    Against

    • i strongly dissagree with this motion, because.its really harmfull
  47. 1197.

    Canada should ban homeschooling that teaches against homosexuality

    For

    • Any argument of any sort can be made. There are no restrictions to content. 2. No arguments whatsoever can be made in the comment sections.
    • We can re-do it right now if you want. I just didn't have the time earlier in the week, and now I do.

    Against

    • I would be willing to copy and paste my previous arguments as is and continue the debate from round 2. If these terms are acceptable please let me know. Thank you. -DS
    • It is with sorrow that I accept the forfeiture.It is my wish that when my opponent is ready that this debate may be revisited so it may be seen to its full fruition.Until that time I wish my opponent well in his travels.Thank you.-DS
  48. 1198.

    Prostitution should be legalized in the United States

    For

    • 1. Sources- a. Look back at the prior arguments and decide for yourselves; links two and three were broken for me, and I called my opponent out on that. That isn't a Strawman, as I didn't build up an alternative argument; I simply attacked my opponent's sources which is more…
    • 1.Evidence- a. My opponent's first source is a religious website whose intent is witness and prayer for others. An moral implications (explicitly expressed or not) are invalid due to the intentions of this website. b. The link to my opponent's second and third sources are…

    Against

    • My opponent has made various strawman arguments. I ask that conduct be deducted in his case.My first source is the same as his first source, and I use it in an economic context, not an explicitly moral context, as my opponent falsely charges (strawman argument).The second link…
    • I thank DoctorDeku for hosting this debate and I appreciate the civility, candor, and readability of his presentation.ArgumentPRO has framed the debate around prostitution as a moral and legal imperative. However, by doing so, PRO has attempted to skirt the economic realities…
  49. 1199.

    Illegal immigrants deserve due process

    For

    • Yes, especially considering the Supreme Court has consistently given rights to even illegal immigrants, especially in the case of Wong Wing v. U.S. Illegal immigrants should be guaranteed due process because otherwise the United States has the unconditional control over the…
    • My personal view has nothing to do with the argument. I am arguing that illegal immigrants have a constitutional right to due process according to the fourteenth amendment. However, if the argument is emotional or personal I do believe illegal immigrants have the right to due…

    Against

    • Should illegal immigrants be given the right to due process before deportation from the US? No they should not, they are not citizens. US citizens have earned the right to due process or those that are visiting that are here legally.
    • Touch". I have my own personal ideas about our citizens in prison lol I am writing a argumentative paper stating that all illegal immigrants should be deported automatically. Other than the laws and constitution, what is your personal view or emotional view?
  50. 1200.

    Governments should enact severe gun control laws

    For

    • For things like gun control, you cannot have one policy for an entire nation. I think that if we do things on the state or county level, then more people would be happy. My argument is that give gun control to the people in the areas that want it and let people keep their guns…
    • Challenge Accepted

    Against

    • Bop is shared. (Kudos to SebUK for giving such amazing arguments to completely change my opinion about gun control. Given well arguments to change my stance. I respect him for that.)First round is acceptance.Definition of severe: (of something bad or undesirable) very great;…
    • I have no argument to present due to the forfeiture.

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.