Law Debate Topics — page 20
2,217 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 951.
The burka and burkini should be banned
For
- Although the final argument is not for rebuttals I will comment on a couple of your points. You say that we have no right to tell people what they can and can't wear, yet you appear to have no problems with the current ban on nudity. Why is nudity banned? It is banned firstly…
- Unsurprisingly straw men left, right, and centre. I never said anything to do with terrorism yet you bring it up. Wearing the burqa out of free will means nothing when they have been taught that the female body is either unworthy or too special to be seen by men. If I teach a…
Against
- Well first off, I'm glad to see France removing the ban on the Burkini. It was obvious that it was the stupidest ban you could place. The Burqa is not harming anyone, nudity is. Homosexuality is damaging society and yet it is endorsed. Homosexuality is not genetic, despite what…
- Freedom should definitely have its limits. Banning the Burqa is not one of those limits. Women who wear the Burqa have done protests because of the ban because it's not anyone's right to force a woman to not wear a Burqa. You know what I find wrong in society? Women being seen…
- 952.
The death penalty should be supported
For
- The United Nations in 2008 banned the use of the death penalty, however fifty-eight countries, including the United States and China, still exercise the death penalty. As such, the topic remains highly controversial. I believe that some criminals lost their human faces while…
Against
- Disappointingly, nargiz_gab has once again forfeited his opportunity to advance his arguments. I, however, will reiterate why the death penalty ought not be supported.Humans are not omniscient, thus uncertainty as to someone's guilt will exist. If the death penalty was…
- I am disappointed that nargiz_gab has forfeited this round.However, I would like to present my argument for why the death penalty ought not be supported and to do so I would like to explore the reasons that the UN's General Assembly gave in support for its 2008 moratorium on…
- 953.
Prostitution should be legalized in all states
For
- well I guess now is for the voters
- Problem with Stripping Although it can make quick money, but the job is usually late night. Prostitution can be done any time making it a more desirable job. Stripping can cause too much problem from owners that are inconsiderate of the workers, while prostitution is mainly a…
Against
- - Stripping and porn are a suitable way to fill this industry while providing people the finances they need without turning to prostitution- The potential problems with prostitution do not outweigh the potential benefits especially when the market already has strippers and…
- Problem with StrippingMost people in America work and working hours would prevent you from getting a quicky from the local prostitute in the same way that it prevents people from heading to the strip club over their lunch hour. This time frame argument is ridiculous.…
- 954.
The US government should legalize prostitution
For
- Framework: Many people whom oppose Prostitution will argue that Prostitution brings more crime, STD's will be more on the rise, and we put out police officers at risk. But, in reality, if we were to make it legal, we would actually have healthy sex workers, crime in the field…
- I will make this very short, since my opponent didn't make a conclusion. I have successfully shown the benefits of legalizing prostitution, and also used sources, that supported my arguments. I have also shown my opponents arguments to be faulty, by using evidence.
Against
- First Contention: Poverty Many women become prostitutes due to poverty. If legalized, prostitution would seem an acceptable solution to poverty, making it much more popular, leading to a rise in STDs. It can't be guaranteed that the people hiring the prostitutes will use…
- DefinitionsUSFG- United States Federal GovernmentProstiitution- the act of engaging in sexual relations for money http://www.merriam-webster.com...Round StructureRound 1- Pro posts opening arguments.Round 2- Con posts opening arguments, Pro posts rebuttals.Round 3- Rebuttals…
- 955.
Marijuana should be legalized for recreational use
For
- The case for Legalizing Marijuana use in the United States stems froms the nation's deep respect for the individual. The strong belief in personal freedom appears early in the nation's history. The Declaration of Independence speaks of every citizen's right to "life, liberty,…
Against
- I think it's pretty obvious who won here. If you want to see my butt handed to me though, follow this: http://www.debate.org...
- I must have a curse or something. My last two debates (and now this) were against forfeiters. Oh well. I extend my arguments from R1 to here so that my opponent (if he comes back) can leave a rebuttal in his closing arguments. Thus far, you, the audience, most vote for me…
- 956.
Prostitution should be legal in the United States
For
- 1. The Right To Do What We Want With Our Own BodiesWe have the right (if not legal right) to do whatever we want with our own bodies, so long as it doesn't infringe upon the rights of another. Con says we don't have that right in regard to prostitution, based on these factors:…
- Many thanks to my opponent for all of his compliments, and for posting his round in a timely manner. I apologize for being busy (not really... because I've been having a lot of fun!) this holiday weekend and posting my round so late. If it's any consolation to my opponent, I…
Against
- 1) Rights to do what you want with your bodyA) Whether or not STD's drop depends on how often the Prostitutes are tested, and whether it be after every client or every two weeks testing doesnt protect prostitutes from other kinds of NON-STD diseases that could be damaging or…
- 1) We have (?) the right to do what we want with our bodies. Pro has admitted that we dont have all the rights to do what we want with our body and has requested that I argue why we shouldnt have that right, which is something that I am not disputing. There are certainly times…
- 957.
Fourteen-year-olds convicted of murder as adults should be imprisoned
For
- Yes, putting a young teenager is adult prison for a long sentence is unlawful, but does that make 1st degree murder lawful? 1st degree murder is decided by the prosecutor and judge which is a credited source, so if a murder is defined as 1st degree then the suspect was clearly…
- At the age of 16 you can receive you Driver's License and take your life and the lives of others into your own hands when you get behind the wheel of a car. At the age of 14 you are aware enough to take another person's life. 1st degree murder is defined as In most states,…
Against
- If you are a child and you commit a crime yes you should be punished but no I do not believe sending a child to adult court is right. Children the age of 14 still don't have the mind of saying if something is right or wrong. I still made mistakes when I was 14 years old but…
- 14 year olds doing crimes should get punished yes they may understand how to kill but putting them into adult prisons is unlawful. Research has shown that juveniles incarcerated with adults are 5 times more likely to report being sexually assaulted then in juvenile facilities…
- 958.
Guns are not necessary in modern society
For
- For clarification, when I said "in instances where someone's livelihood depends on owning a gun (hunters)" I meant not only hunters but also anyone whose livelihood depends on a gun, which includes soldiers and police officers who use weapons as a tool for their jobs . Now i'll…
- Gun legalization is not needed in the US for anything past very small calibre and in instances where someone's livelihood depends on owning a gun (hunters). Rules: -Citations needed
Against
- But first let's talk about the resolution. The resolution itself is highly skewed in pro's favor. Not only is it set up as a negative wording (instead of affirming to do x action, the resolution is set up so that affirming means we don't do x action, which is a little bit of a…
- My insults to you would've given you a free point to pretty much any voter, but then you went and ad hom'd my grammar. Niiiiiiice. There's really not a lot to respond to in this round. I'll just go over the key things in the round and how he still really hasn't refuted a single…
- 959.
States should be allowed to enforce their own immigration laws
For
- Arizona law is reasonable, measured response to illegal immigration
- Government protection (from illegal immigrants) is a const. right.
Against
- Statements against Arizona immigration law
- Support for Arizona's law is understandable, but misguided
- 960.
Waterboarding is an acceptable means of intelligence gathering
For
- A1. Waterboarding is not torture. The word "torture" is defined as: "the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty. " "Torture involves extreme, brutal pain — breaking bones, passing…
- I would like to propose a debate on the idea that the practice of waterboarding, while distasteful, is an acceptable and sometimes necessary practice during interrogations. I will be arguing in favor of its use. First round is for acceptance. Thank you.
Against
- I have taken an extended hiatus from serious debate for some time now, primarily due to scheduling constraints, but also due to the lack of quality debate. Despite this, I see a lot of potential in this debate and with my opponent, and have opted to take it. I will make a…
- I hope that the reader was both entertained and even learned new things during the course of the exchange. === REBUTTALS === PRO begins her final rebuttal by reiterating that the topic is about waterboarding being an "acceptable" means of gathering intelligence. Of course,…
- 961.
Terrorism suspects should be tried in civilian courts
For
- KSM will almost certainly be convicted in NY civilian courts
- Legitimate trials are harder for radicals to criticize
Against
- Trying terrorists in NYC grants them their wish
- Trying terrorists in NYC invites a terrorist attack
- 962.
Polygamy should be legal in the United States
For
- *Burden Analysis * I've provided analysis of the political and legal philosophy of legal permissibility. Woodpecker responded with "the hassle of changing combined with the popular opposition to polygamy ought be enough to win me the debate". The hassle of changing an unjust…
- *Burden Analysis* In the US, we defer to allowing actions. In addition, when Congress tries to make an action illegal, the burden of proof always lies on those trying to do so. Consider a ban punishing cyborgs who pogo-stick. Even if there are no reasons not to have such a law,…
Against
- So I only have 12 minutes to do this, and I'm on a plane, but I'll give it my best shot. First of all, thank you to Zab for a very interesting, spirited round. There are just a few things I want to focus on to sum up the debate. 1. Do women give meaningful consent to polygamy…
- Burdens Look, if neither of us gives any persuasive arguments as to why polygamy should or should not be banned, the fact that the US is a democratic society and there is massive popular opposition here to polygamy means that I win the round. Popular opinion is obviously…
- 963.
Abortion should be illegal unless the mother's life is at risk
For
- First, my opponent claims I contradict myself, that my argument denies women the right to an abortion. This is incorrect. There are two problems, one Abortion is not a right. Abortion is the killing of an individual who has rights, but is just not born yet. A person does not…
- To define the parameters of this debate, abortion shall be defined as the termination of a pregnancy through the removal of the fetus. A just society will look towards the maximization of rights, as rights are necessary for happiness, and happiness is inherently good. To uphold…
Against
- My opponent claims that "abortion is not a right". However, the Supreme Court has ruled that a woman has the "right" to an abortion. Therefore, it is a right. That brings us the second part of his rebuttal. An unborn fetus, not a human, should not have enough rights so that the…
- I'll start off Cons with a contention to your contention (haha). Your opening statement, "A just society will look towards the maximization of rights, as rights are necessary for happiness, and happiness is inherently good.", contradicts your argument, since denying the right…
- 964.
The Second Amendment should be defended and enforced
For
- You try to use a study by the New England Journal of Medicine in a gun debate. Why, because you can find no other studies to back up your arguments. You say that unless there are studies done of the areas around Chicago, a study done in Chicago is pointless. No, it is not…
- You say that "The Second Amendment could be removed, though." True. The ability for us to vote could also be removed. That does not mean it should be. You say that there is no link between authority and duty. Au contraire, there is a huge link between them. Think of it this…
Against
- Why yes, I'm citing a medical journal on guns. I fail to see any significant problem with this. Of course, it's undoubtedly true that it's the kind of thing that we wouldn't necessarily expect to find in a medical journal. But we have no problem with considering the effects of…
- 1. And did these studies about Chicago compare the area with surrounding areas without gun laws--that is to say, did it use controls? If not, it's useless. Real, controlled studies found that DC's gun laws saved 42 lives a year[1], and that just having a gun in your house makes…
- 965.
Leaders who use extraordinary rendition should face war crimes trials
For
- maltreatment of refugees, displaced persons, bought and bagged prisoners, no longer in their homeland
- It is illegal by international law
Against
- On preventing terrorism
- States have a duty to protect their citizens and a right to self-defence.
- 966.
Gun rights should be protected
For
- Con hasn;t rebutted my point about guns being useful in crises such as war and revolutions, and about unofficial security agencies. Crimes "In 2010, 67.5% of all murders were committed using firearms [1] and out of all the crimes that occur in the United States each year, 4%…
- We will debating about the idea that civilians should be given to right to have licensed guns. I am pro gun rights as they help in self-defense, arm non-government security officials and help in crises such as revolutions and war. Self-defense Guns can be used for self-defense.…
Against
- Okay, first of all, could you please actually READ the debate CLEARLY and THOROUGHLY before you make any 'random' assumptions. I did not rebut any of your points because we agreed that Round 2 was for ARGUMENTS only (apologies, I cannot italicise). So I would like to ask…
- Round 2 is arguments only so I will rebut all your points in the next round. With that being said, I now begin my main arguments. First of all, guns are the main source of crime in a country and they are also highly dangerous. Think about it, there is not much constructive use…
- 967.
Same-sex marriage is not a civil right
For
- Since CON has forfeited twice, he concedes this debate. Therefore, I urge a PRO vote.
- I want to add something that I may not have been clear about before. The nature of my arguments can apply anywhere in the world because I don't just say that gay marriage is not a civil right merely based on what the government and courts have randomly declared. I explain the…
Against
- I concur with Pro's assesment. Vote Pro.I appologize to my opponent and audience for not entering timely arguements for the subject at hand.
- Civil Rights "rights to personal liberty established by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. constitution and certain Congressional acts, especially as applied to an individual or a minority group."[1] AMENDMENT XIV "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and…
- 968.
Age of consent laws should be made more liberal
For
- The censorship laws are a relic from the past.
- We should defend children's freedom of expression.
Against
- Lowering the age of consent will cause criminal dangers.
- We must protect the vulnerable in society.
- 969.
Marijuana should be legalized in Canada
For
- This debate is about the legalization of marijuana in Canada, Bop is on the side of Pro, Pro needs to provide significant arguments that marijuana should be legalized in Canada, and if Con fails to refute those than Pro wins. Legalization will be defined as ONLY pharmacies will…
- I do not want this to be a battle of sources.Con stated that my website is a biased source, however Con failed to provide an argument to convince the voters why my source is biased. According to Newstrust the Huffington post is credible as in 2006 it was the 5th most popular…
Against
- This is the first time I debated this topic and I learned many things from my opponent. Before I begin my arguments, I will summarize the contentions used on each side. Pro believes that marijuana should be legalized for two main reasons:Marijuana is not a very harmful…
- Sorry for the previous round (for the distorted rich text). I will recap my arguments quickly for the reader. Long-term marijuana is addictive. Marijuana alters your brain structure. Marijuana Smokers Faces more Rapid Lung Destruction than Cigarette Smokers. Marijuana Smoke…
- 970.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offense
For
- Holocaust denial opens doors to harmful, non-factual views
- Holocaust denial becomes increasingly threatening as witnesses die.
Against
- Holocaust denial wrongly promotes some rights over others
- Allowing Holocaust denial helps expose and deligitimize it
- 971.
State bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional
For
- My opponent must lose this debate. Now, whatever arguments he presents, I would have no way to respond to. And that would be extremely unfair. If my opponent would like to retry this debate and challenge me, I would love to try it. 1. The 14th amendment of the Constitution…
- 1. The 14th amendment of the Constitution states that "no state shall deny equal protection under the laws." A ban on gay marriage says that straight couples can get these rights, but gay couples cannot. 2. The Supreme Court case, Loving vs. Virginia, states that marriage is…
Against
- If you put it on the challenge board, I may re-respond. Otherwise I'm sure others will gladly take this one. Voge for Pro. However, it would still be fair if I made an argument and you couldn't respond. The rounds end with my arguments and you wouldn't have a chance to respond…
- I unfortunatly have to forfeit this round but will be able to resume in round 2
- 972.
Aaron Hernandez should be exonerated
For
- defense: 1. I did not say that he was innocent or guilty, all what I have said is that there is not enough evidence for a conviction. 2. He does not have any sources, nor does he have any evidence, therefore you cannot vote for him. Extend my offense Offense: 1. All the…
- Defense: 1. I did not say that he was innocent or guilty, all what I have said is that there is not enough evidence for a conviction. Offense: 1. All the evidence is circumstantial: 2. Nobody saw who fired the gun, it could have bee anybody that was with Hernandes it might…
Against
- Eventhough they didn't see a shooting dosen't mean that he has a chance of going. A body was found, there were forensics, fingerprints, everything. A bucket load of evidence proving that gives him a huge chance of being put away.
- From NFL Total Access and NFL Network and TmZ..Here is why I'm right http://www.youtube.com...
- 973.
Retribution should be valued above rehabilitation in the US criminal justice system
For
- Let's start by looking again at my responses to my opponent's case. Opponent's Contention 1: Retribution increases crime rate across the nation - Retribution actually acts as a deterrent as people are afraid to act based on the consequences. 1) My opponent dropped this idea…
- I agree with all my opponent's definitions. Opponent's Contention 1: Retribution increases crime rate across the nation - Retribution actually acts as a deterrent as people are afraid to act based on the consequences. Opponent's Contention 2: Rehabilitation costs less than…
Against
- In response to my opponent's comment about this not being preschool, and that it's the real word, he is correct about that. Doesn't that mean that we should be grown-ups and give people a second chance? Where does it say anywhere that because a person committed a crime, we…
- 1. Can you tell me why equality does not link up to my case? 2. Is it morally right to punish people who can be giving positive input back into the community? Every person deserves a second chance. Is it morally right to not give criminals that second chance? As for evidence, I…
- 974.
Prostitution should be legal in all US states
For
- I don't quite agree that if prostitution became legal, young girls would suddenly see this as anything more than degrading. Stripping is legal in nearly every state, and MOST girls who get into it simply because they HAVE to, not because they want too. Likewise, porn is just as…
- I will take this argument First and Foremost, Prostitution is something that should be held to the state. If Colorado, Texas, Illinois, and Georgia want prostitution to be legal, that should be within their right to decide for themselves. Kentucky, Florida, California, and…
Against
- If we legalize prostitution it is another way for young girls to see sex as something that isn't meaningful. Clearly you and I have different meanings of the word sex. To you, sex is something fun that you do with anyone you want. You can walk away from it with little or no…
- In regards to your first point, I completely agree. The 10th amendment clearly states that issues not granted to the fed gov in the constitution are left up to the states. I'm going to change the argument a tad, but your points still apply. Instead of all 50 states lets just…
- 975.
The death penalty should be used for murderers
For
- I challenge anyone to debate me on this. If you accept, I thank you in advance. (: I believe in the Death Penalty because I believe in Life. Opening Statements Allowing murders to live is wrong in my opinion. Everyone has the right to live, until they take that right from…
- " Killing someone can never be excused, even if it's a murderer's life." "If we kill them, we're just stooping to their level. We must set an example to the people saying, taking another person's right to live is not right." "Secondly, if he was just killing my friends and…
Against
- "Everyone has the right to live, until they take that right from someone else, then their own right to life is forfeit. Unless you take the responsibility of the executioner. The executioner keeps his/her right to life because they preserve life by stopping those who seek to…
- Final Statements Think about the definition of justice. The most common form of execution, these days, is by lethal injection. The drug they use for the injection causes the prisoner to fall asleep, stop breathing, and then stops the heart. This causes very little pain and ends…
- 976.
Businesses should have the right to refuse service to anyone
For
- Businesses should have the right to discriminate, the market will help them out of busniess if what they do actually does effect a 'whole community', after all, they will lose all of those potential customers and they will also lose the several people who will not shop based…
- I never said that it is the governments job to 'right the wrongs' of the nation. The only reason the government has the right to have a public busniess (like AmTrak) hold a policy of non-discrimination is because taxpayers pay into this busniess, thus busniess decisions are the…
Against
- Alright DuncoNihilum, you ready for this? Okay, now I just want to lead back to your original argument. You stated that "any busniess, so long as it receives no government funding, has the right to deny service or entry to anyone they please." And, since you agreed with me in…
- First off, I want to say good luck in this debate. Secondly, I only took on this debate as I find it immoral. Just because a person looks like a robber, doesn't mean they are a robber. If a buffet offers an all you can eat deal, a fat person shouldn't be allowed? Just because a…
- 977.
The Second Amendment's militia clause necessitates firearm ownership today
For
- I wish him well. I am sure he is busy with his studies.
- [round]
Against
- Opening Statement: I deny that all laws that would detract from the right to protect the sovereignty of the individual and their neighbors necessarily infringe the Constitution. Moreover, the Militia referred to in the 2nd amendment has little to nothing to do with gun laws and…
- 978.
Non-hunting guns should be banned for civilians
For
- Thank out for showing interest in my debates, and I would be more than happy to have a more extensive debate than my previous ones. As you have probably found out, considering the fact that you have read my previous debates, is that my entire platform is as follows: Those guns…
- I apologize, but I won't have any more time in the next 20 hours to wait for my opponent's argument. Have a nice day!
Against
- sorry that it took me so long to respond I had some issues come up thank you for accepting However i only have 4 minutes left to debate at this particular section of the internet so instead I would like to post my argument right here instead http://young-con.blogspot.com... I…
- I saw you arguing this abard124 and was wondering if I could possibly endear you to have a more extensive debate on the subject and so I would be grateful for your acceptance and out of politeness I will allow you the first argument
- 979.
Terrorism suspects should be granted full due process rights
For
- I"ll be first addressing the overview/framework arguments, then defending my own case, reiterating some of my earlier attacks, and crystallizing/impacting the round. The quotes I offered were not merely "dogma," but rather contained logic that supported my various claims.…
- Firstly, let me give a generic overview of what my opponent has said so far by pointing out that the Con offers no evidence, nor does the Con address, specifically, any of my points (I urge him to do so in this second round). Instead, my opponent's position rests on a series of…
Against
- yeah... you can call me ignorant if you want, but I'm not arguing with that wall of text. I find that quotations serve only to weaken one's argument, being rigid and dogmatic in their interpretation and infuriatingly repetitious in their application. I wasn't aware that I was…
- While I agree that terrorists should have access to judicial proceedings, I disagree that they should be tried as US citizens. First off, someone who is not a US citizen who commits an act of sedition is not entitled to due process, nor have they ever been accorded such rights…
- 980.
Abortion should be legally tolerated
For
- Resolved: Abortion should be legally tolerated. Abortion is defined as a termination of a pregnancy by the induced expulsion of a fetus by Webster's dictionary(1). Abortion is a safe medical procedure, that shouldn't be repealed because of the morals of certain religious…
- "An embryo is a human being". Interesting my opponent might say this because there is no evidence regarding that life does begin at conception making it murder. That is a claim only morally supported, hence they're making a moral debate based on opinions that don't apply to…
Against
- FF
- Prominent embryologists uphold the notion that life begins at conception:"The development of a human being begins with fertilization, a process by which two highly specialized cells, the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female, unite to give rise to a new…
- 981.
Heroin should be legalized
For
- Fun fact : They used to add cocaine to coca cola at the start of the 20th century.
- Fascinating
Against
- I don't care about your stupid requirements, I want to debate this with you. http://www.youtube.com...
- 982.
Kidnappers should face the death penalty
For
- Let me start by exposing the weaknesses of my opponent. My opponent did not present any argument. So I won't be rebutting anything. My opponent did not challenge my definition which means he accepted it and like wise my argument and my opponent will not present any further…
- I will start by definition of terms which will aid me into my argument. kid""nap- /"0"4kid"0"5nap/ verb 1. take (someone) away illegally by force, typically to obtain a ransom. noun 1. the action of kidnapping someone. Kidnapping - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In criminal…
Against
- I'd like to remind voters that my opponent seems unphased about the plagiarism charge. I would remind you that this debate is already over for that very reason, and you should award the points to me for his unoriginal argument. As I stated in Round 1 and clarified in Round 2,…
- First, I'd like to point out my opponent's plagiarism. As you can tell by visiting this link, everything from "as cases for kidnapping" -- even including the capitalized "AS" -- has been copy and pasted: http://www.nairaland.com... and yet he has not provided a citation. Next,…
- 983.
The United States should retain the death penalty
For
- Don't worry about it. Things happen. I hope things start looking up for you after this week.
- With the lack of anything to rebut, I will use this to extend my arguments a bit. The character limit cut me short in the previous round.First off, I want everyone to know that I do not think that prison is a very nice and pleasant place to be. I know that a life in prison is…
Against
- I sincerely apologize to my opponent. I have been very busy with soccer, school and other things and won't be able to finish this debate. On top of that I've had a discouraging and disappointing week and am in no mood for writing debates.I also apologize for the forfeit last…
- Here's too a good debate. Nice avatar choice for you too. Meddle is a great one of Pink Floyds albums. Let's get started now, shall we? Basic overview of what I will be arguing:-That the death penalty is an extreme, and unnecessary risk, in that innocent people have been…
- 984.
Drugs should be legalized in the United States
For
- 1. Drug Use A. Deterrence Con acknowledges that the criminalization of drugs isn't a deterrence for most people. Why implement a counter-productive policy that's ineffective by my opponent's own admission? Next Con notes that his statistic isn't referring only to HS seniors but…
- Thanks, Con. 1. Legalizing Drugs Leads to More Use A. Deterrence A psychological experiment about deterrence and crime conducted in 1978 found that gains were more influential than the probability of capture. In other words, many considered the reward of the crime to be of…
Against
- Whats been great is that we've had an amazing round over a very hot issue, but never once got personal or aggressive. Since this is the last speech I'll just summarize the round. The 5 key arguments in this round are as follows. 1. Will drug use increase or decrease? 2. Do drug…
- I'll over my arguments, then her's. 1A. Deterrance Pro: Many/most users feel the short term high outweighs the risk of punishment. The key word here is "most". This indicates that not everybody feels this way, meaning that some people did admit criminal sanctions affected them.…
- 985.
Suicide should be criminalized
For
- (We're doing this debate again because I really wanted to debate this and couldn't complete the previous debate.) I thank Romanii for the agreeing to debate this resolution. I'm pretty sure this will be an interesting debate, especially because I don't really have any strong…
- I thank Romanni for his timely response! Let me begin by first reiterating the context of illegalization in the debate. Illegalization implies that the 'government' is bound to intervene in case an individual considers suicide. It does not mean forced imprisonment. What exactly…
Against
- Vhere yoo go Cermaaaaaaaaaaaankkkkk???? :(
- Thanks to Cermank for her argument!I'd like to start this round by objecting to Pro's unorthodox definition of "crime"... She seems to interpret it as being "an act which requires government intervention". However, this is not at all the common definition of crime, and it was…
- 986.
Same-sex parents should receive custody as readily as heterosexual parents
For
- There is nothing wrong with Homosexuality, so why shouldn't they be allowed to have custody of children like heterosexuals? It's been proven with 21 studies that children with homosexual parents are more empathetic to socialites problems and are less like to stereotype people…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited again, so my arguments still stand.
- My opponent was unable to post a response to any of my arguments, therefore my arguments still stand.
- 987.
Citizens should be able to own guns
For
- 1A. No, I don't believe that every one of those law abiding citizens had a gun. But apparently you believe that every one of those criminals has a gun. This is very perplexing when only 29% of criminals involved in violent crime had guns[1], while 30% of law abiding citizens…
- That is a very significant concession there. If you agree that guns are very effective at self defense, even if you say no to gun rights because they are dangerous, then I have a very workable case. Basically, more people are law abiding citizens than criminals, and so guns…
Against
- Reconstruction: 1A. Pro said "999,980 per 100,000". That's bad math. I'll assume Pro meant 99,980 per 100,000. Let's follow the line of thinking, shall we? Pro believes: a) "The US violent crime rate for 2008 was 20 per 100,000. That means for the 99,980 people per 100,000 who…
- Reconstruction: 1A "The US violent crime rate for 2008 was 20 per 100,000[1]. That means for the 999,980 people per 100,000 who weren't committing crimes were using guns to protect themselves. What this means is that people with guns are MUCH more likely to use guns to protect…
- 988.
The United States should legalize all drugs
For
- Jeff Deeney, a former drug addict who now works as a social worker, wrote a piece in the Atlantic that calls for treating heroin like a health issue, not a criminal act. Out of the 1.5 million people arrested for drug crimes in 2012, 82 percent were for possession, and 16.5…
- C1) Paternalism is bad The government should not tell us what to do with our own bodies when we do something that harms no one else. Drugs would fall into this category. C2) Criminal networks According to Seth Jones of RAND Corporation, the Taliban gets 70-80% of their funding…
Against
- http://www.cdc.gov... http://m.nydailynews.com... https://www.drugabuse.gov... There's the sources, didn't share them because I assume most people know this stuff, it's something people should know if they keep up with the new and such. Addictions should be treated like a…
- I am going to focus on one drug right now, that is very life threatening, and should never be legalized, it's heroin. A study conducted by the Center For Disease Control and Prevention showed that heroin related deaths have skyrocketed over the past 5 years. In 2013, 8,200…
- 989.
Capital punishment should be abolished as a form of legal punishment
For
- First off, I'd like to pose a question. If (as my fellow opposition says) that life (without parole) in prison is truly worse than capital punishment, then why would the latter be a better deterrent? As for which one abrogates more rights, I'd like to argue that there are no…
- I shall begin with some rebuttal. "he did not state why these Human Rights are important. So what? The opposition is basing his argument on the common belief that Human Rights are important. " I mentioned Human Rights and assumed that the general public would reasonable see…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited (See comments)
- What my fellow opposition seems to believe here, is that human rights are the most important thing in the world. Half of his arguments are based on the human rights act. Two can play that game. I'd first like to ask a very important question: Is it more cruel to kill somebody…
- 990.
Gun ownership rights are fair to all citizens
For
- what is it with people forfeiting? I just had to deliver my closing argument to another debate that was forfeited. Well, this really wasn't a "debate", so I really don't have a closing argument. The solution to the gun problem isn't an easy one. 1. Everyone has the right to…
- Considering my opponent forfeited the round, I cannot post an arguement. I have nothing to argue against. =(
Against
- ok, so now let's say that i have my license and i have my (i don't want to even say weapon) lets use "firearm" i'm all ready to go. Now like you said i have the right to defend myself, but what if i was a mindless shooter. Say i just didn't care i shot not people but like…
- yes, you are right and thank you. Ok yes, people do have the right to defend themselves. because lots of times it comes down to tht point a citizen protecting himself. I will say this I am a boyscout NRA certified. but does that necessarily give me the right to walk around town…
- 991.
Polygamy should be legal for consenting adults
For
- it seems my opponent has lost his argument.
- My opponent has not provided a URL/ corrct citing. How do we know this is refutable? Anyways-i have provided my source at :http://www.conservapedia.com...... this link is still working.i chacked it now. Let's do a little scenario: Pretend you are a girl (I don't know if you are…
Against
- My opponent has not provided a URL/ corrct citing. How do we know this is refutable? Anyways- Let's do a little scenario: Pretend you are a girl (I don't know if you are one, though I'm assuming you aren't) You have just found the love of your life. You marry and live a happy…
- Polygamy is immoral, barbaric and disrespectful. A man is only supposed to have one wife he can cherish forever. Having sex with many women is disrespectful.
- 992.
Capital punishment in Texas is unjust
For
- The death penalty is costlyMy point with bringing upstatistics from states not including texas was to draw out the underlying reasons why the death penalty is far more expensive than life imprisonment - still, it is fair to demand statistics for Texas as well. According to the…
- I wish to make a note on the criterion used to judge the outcome of this debate. Utilitarianism is a broad term for a wide range of philosophical positions - in particular, there is wide disagreement over the 'utility' or 'good' that is to be maximised - it could be human…
Against
- ===Opening===== For a brief road map I will be address my opponents points made and further move on to rebuilding my case ===Arguments (Against pro)=== 1. Although a very good point, we also have to look at the studies my opponent offers, the state of Kansas? We HAVE to adhere…
- I stand in firm negation of todays resolution Resolved: Capital Punishment in Texas is unjust. To start I would like to define a few keys terms, First from Merriam Webster dictionary Unjust is defined as not based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair. The…
- 993.
Bestiality should be illegal
For
- Con once again argues against the value of my challenge without answering it, so we can only assume she cannot create a way of minimizing the risk to the point we can justify legalization. I have fulfilled my burden of proof by showing the damage done by raping animals, which i…
- Bestiality can be similar to rape because we do not have consent. << I will note that he speaks with the assumption that many or most acts of bestiality are abusive or non-consensual.>> I am speaking under the assumption that enough are abusive not to justify legalizing it. < >…
Against
- On a quick note of conduct, my opponent has now incorrectly referred to me as a man multiple times. This is despite my portrait, my profile, and having been corrected in the comments section. BURDEN OF PROOF "Con has refused my challenge, instead of answering he shifted the…
- As requested, I've waited to post my argument. My opponent states his argument as "bestiality is similar to rape," but he has not demonstrated that this is true. But before I address my opponent's claims, I will note that he speaks with the assumption that many or most acts of…
- 994.
Juveniles charged with violent felonies should be tried as adults
For
- Greetings, once again! My opponent seems determined to muddy the resolution with semantics. Though his resolution doesn't mention "delinquents," it does mention that the juveniles have been arrested, thus making them delinquent. My opponent also contends that I didn't address…
- Thanks for hosting the debate! Your response was certainly astonishing, I might say. : ) I hope you enjoyed creating it. Firstly, I've never stated that all juveniles are horrible murderers. This is especially true since all young people are "juvenile," and it is only the…
Against
- "Since the "Age of Responsibility" varies from State to State, we can utilize the age of twelve as an average (twelve is also the Age of Responsibility in Canada). " He claims I never contradicted this, in fact I did. I contended that the definition of a juvenile is up to the…
- Thank you for accepting. A brief roadmap, I will state my case and move on to attack my opponentts. The format of my case is a normal case, counterplan, disadvantage of my opponent's plan to send juveniles to adult facilities. First: I would like to address the fact he says all…
- 995.
Prison prostitution should be legalized in US federal prisons
For
- LogicMy opponent has put forth the argument that since people who end up in prison are obviously incapable or unwilling to follow rules, they will obviously be incapable or unwilling to follow my logic. At first glance this may seem like a reasonable assessment, but I believe…
- 1) I don't know. However the possibility of them not having enough funds shouldn't be of issue. Since this would be run by the government, they wouldn't have to set their prices to make a profit, they'd just set prices in a manner that firstly assures the main objective of this…
Against
- I apologize, but I will not be able to finish this debate due to time constraints and extracurricular' s that demand my attention. It was my belief that their would only be three rounds and thus I only prepared for three rounds, but ignorance is no excuse. I will let the…
- Thanks Pro! I would like to finish my argument based upon three things: logic, health, and finance. Logic: "3) I cannot provide any statistical guarantees, only a guarantee ensured by logic. If you're straight, it is logical that you would choose a woman to deal with (excuse me…
- 996.
There should be no laws regulating gay marriage
For
- How did I make people seem like "sex machines", besides aren't Catholics, the ones with large families? I don't recall saying they would stay faithful, but wouldn't there be more faith to somebody your married to? I never said marriage would create safer practices, but there…
- Okay I will attack my opponent then defend myself: "My Response:Ok, so in my opponents first sentence he is essentially making marriage one big orgy. He is in essence saying: yay, now that were married let's do some very gay and pleasurable things together." I do not see how…
Against
- "How did I make people seem like "sex machines", besides aren't Catholics, the ones with large families? I don't recall saying they would stay faithful, but wouldn't there be more faith to somebody your married to? I never said marriage would create safer practices, but there…
- Ok, first I will define some key terms. Gay Marriage: The legal marriage between homosexual couples. ================================================================================= I'll attack my opponents case then move to defend/create my own. "There is no reason why…
- 997.
More guns mean less crime
For
- Um ok arguments me, conduct me, yeah he gets spelling. Sources unknown.
- well he conceded so I do not have to um refute anything I won.
Against
- I'm bored so. .. Just bringing back Koopin's speaches.
- NOTE: I conceded due to the fact of no clarification. Please read my Round 2 explanation: (after the resolution).Though he wins, I urge you to give Con: Spelling & Grammar. Rest of the points: 16kadams. Also, I'm going snowboarding tomorrow so I won't be on.Rubric: Just a…
- 998.
Drug prohibition does not work
For
- Restore our rights and responsibilities
- Global implications
Against
- Legalisation would not stop drug crime
- State's duty of care
- 999.
All recreational drugs should be illegal
For
- Precisely because you can see a difference in smoking a cigarette and smoking crack means there is a huge difference between the top of the slope and the bottom -- which is why pure slippery slope arguments are always stupid. Let me just ask: Before he serves you, would you…
- Like everyone else in America, I had never really listened to the arguments of the drug legalization crowd because ... it's not going to happen. These people are like scholars whose area of expertise is an obscure bug in a Third World country. Their theories could be completely…
Against
- "The principle of freedom cannot require that he should be free not to be free. It is not freedom to be allowed to alienate his freedom" (Mill). Mill's argument is inconclusive. Everyday, people willingly engage in contracts, giving up some of their freedoms, in exchange for…
- "The most superficially appealing argument for drug legalization is that people should be allowed to do what they want with their own bodies, even if it ruins their lives. Except that's not true. Back on Earth, see, we live in a country that will not allow people to live with…
- 1000.
All drugs should be legal and state-controlled
For
- My Rebuttle The classic response of individuals who possess no first hand knowledge or experience of narcotics is to turn to statistics as the basis for their arguments (it's worth pointing out at this stage that I did indeed mention statistics in my opening statement, but only…
- The early part of the 20th century saw laws and legislation introduced to control narcotics that are still used today. Even though our understanding of the effects of these narcotics, their influence on health and lifestyle have improved greatly and there are scientific studies…
Against
- I would like to first note most of my opponents arguments are bare assertions, opinions, or unverifiable arguments. 1. How the drug war started and the statsIt does not matter how the drug war started, why? Because many good causes are started by unfavorable means. The only…
- ==My opponents case== My opponents case is extremely weak. He is very vague, his only argunment is that statistics show we should legalize drugs. But he has provided none nor has he shown where those statistics apply. Therefore his argunment should be discarded. ==My case== C1.…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?