Law Debate Topics for Students — page 4
1,241 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 151.
Legislation should extend First Amendment rights to employees and students
For
- I have been criticized by some for a perceived over-reliance on semantics. But there is a big difference between my opponent's argument when he mentions "My opponent is essentially trading off one right for another..." and his more recent reference to that same argument where…
- I will counter my opponent's arguments in the order in which they appear in his argument. ". .. the resolution will in fact make it so private employers will have no right to restrain speech in their workplace. " Not so. Instances of speech containing threats, sexual or ethnic…
Against
- I will now counter my opponent's arguments in the order he has listed them (which were listed in order against my case) Then I will go over a few brief points I will accept his definition of the resolution on his first point, where he states that other laws still apply. On his…
- I accept the challenge and look forward to rigorous debate on this topic. First of all, it must be noted that in the status quo, people retain free speech rights but are only protected from the state and national governments under the 1st, 5th, and 14th Amendments combined.…
- 152.
Fourteen-year-olds should be allowed to drive
For
- Well.. I assume this is a forfeit. That's a shame.
- Not much to say here. Don't text and drive kids....
Against
- Why shouldn't young people the age of 14 drive? We teens also need to get places and we teens probably have jobs too. We need to let teens drive cause I read an article saying if they get 500,000 votes then teens the age of 14 is allowed to drive and I will fight so that teens…
- 153.
Hate crime laws do more good than harm
For
- Ladies and gentlemen, we live in an age where society is becoming increasingly integrated and multicultural. This is a more tolerant and liberal era than any in human history - in most of the world, people of every nationality, religion, age, gender, gender identity, sexual…
- Thanks to my opponent for an engaging discussion. In this round I will offer a quick summary of what just happened. First, let's look at what pro said:1. ArbitraryMy opponent first tried to say I was only protecting some groups at the expense of others. I responded in round two…
Against
- Arbitrary PRO cites the Swedish-Spanish model. Although the Swedish model uses "other circumstances" as bases for what constitutes a hate, it should be noted that the Spanish model only protects special classes. Also note that the Swedish model lists many other "protected…
- Many thanks to my opponent. Arbitrary PRO states that his model takes every group into account, not just "protected group". He states "If hate towards a particular group aggravated an attack, or caused one to utter hate speech, then that should at the least be taken into…
- 154.
The driving age should remain 16
For
- I feel that teens need their freedom, do you remember when you where 16 and you were looking forward to your driver's licence, I sure was. I use to dream about the day I would get a car, I didn't even care which kind I just wanted one to call mine. Why would anyone want to…
Against
- WHAT? A FORFEIT? I did not expect that.
- Please extend all arguments.
- 155.
State police should replace local police departments
For
- Local police departments are inefficient. Except in large municipalities, they tend to drain local tax revenues (say when politicians splurge on public safety investment during their campaigns as a means to be "tough on crime" like in the wasteful and not-so-effective war on…
Against
- Vote for Donnie!
- So much waiting...
- 156.
Personal tragedy should be considered when sentencing criminals
For
- Tragedy in one's life does influence our ability to reason and make sound decisions. For example, soldiers returning from overseas may suffer PTSD, when they're exposed to loud noises like fireworks or other like experiences it may trigger a response that's not based in their…
- Tragedy can be defined as, "an event that causes great suffering, stress, or destruction." This could be interpreted to include those afflicted with mental illnesses or other like ailments. Is it just to consider tragedy when deciding punishment?
Against
- Everyone experiences tragedy at least once in their lives. Some experience more than others for one reason or another. I'm going to leave mental illness to the side for a moment and then I will touch the subject after this. It's very difficult to find one person who has not…
- The world is filled with tragic lives, people who have suffered great pains and injustice. Do they all commit crimes? People have the chance and freedom to decide whether they commit a crime or they don't. Whether the person who committed the crime lived a happy or tragic life…
- 157.
The US should accept an international court for crimes against humanity
For
- i would like to do this lincoln dougls debate style The actual resolution states Resolved: The United States ought to submit to the jurisdiction of an international court design to prosecute crimes against humanity I affirm the resolution Resolved: The United States ought to…
- i am sorry i shorten the some words in the topic the resolution states Resolved: the united states ought to submit to an international design to prosecute crimes against humanity and the obs means observation of the resolution which is me defining what it is saying and that we…
Against
- Everyone, this debate is my win so please you vote me because of the reasons. My point is this. First, international tribunal that supported by USA government can only judges weak crimes. Why? Because I already showed you these examples and I added 'international tribunal can…
- Response Value Criterion But I don't think International court can prosecute these things. You said 'we prosecuted nazi war criminals and here are just several more that are in front of the court right now Situation in Democratic Republic of the Congo Situation in Uganda…
- 158.
Jury nullification is a just check on government in the United States
For
- Let the battle begin!
- Thanks for the debate, Aburk. =Framework=Vote on whichever world provides the most justice. In this final round, I will go over the arguments made in the debate and attempt to prove that I have clearly provided a world with a greater amount of justice. =My case=Let's start with…
Against
- Lincoln-Douglas style debate. First round is for acceptance only. I look forward to this debate!
- I will begin by defending my case and conclude by refuting Pro"s. From the beginning, my opponent misinterprets my stance on the value of equality. Equality cannot and should not be mandated throughout every aspect of any society. The equality that I speak of is the equal…
- 159.
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act should be abolished or amended
For
- We still need to protect the youth of this nation.How are youth protected when many lie about their age. 7.5 million children are on Facebook, which shows children are not protected.http://abcnews.go.com...Quote from…
- The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) requires websites to seek verified parental consent before knowingly allowing children under 13 to sign up. I think the law should be abolished or amended.http://en.wikipedia.org...'s_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act1. Allowing…
Against
- Maybe the FTC should make it harder so kids can't lie about their ages.
- Yes, kids might be lying a lot. However we still have trust. They put themselves in harm by doing that. We still need to protect the youth of this nation.
- 160.
The government should get out of marriage
For
- I believe that it is unconstitutional for the government to say who can get married to who.
- Please respond if you accept the challenge. Rules- No feel arguments-work in facts and mainly the constitution of the U. S.
Against
- The Constitution says nothing about marriage.
- There are many things not enumerated in the Constitution that the government does anyway. As long as it does not interfere with the Bill of Rights and, more specifically, the freedom of religion, then how does it affect you?
- 161.
The right to bear arms is good
For
- Absolutely no one on any side is trying to fight for there right to bear nuclear weapons. As you said, its hardly plausible. Your argument that the definition of "arms" has expanded is really missing the point at hand. While technology has advanced significantly...the purpose…
- The right to bear arms is absolutely crucial to individual freedom. The right is clearly set forth in the US Constitution in the second amendment. It is also extremely important in the idea that citizens should have the means to overthrow an oppressive government, if necessary.
Against
- Here is my point as simply as I can present it: The topic is: The right to bear arms is good. Of course, what you probably meant is that people should be allowed to own guns, a common interpretation of the Amendment. All I'm saying is this: The phrase "the right to bear arms"…
- "The right to bear arms" is terrible, because it is a vague expression, written over 200 years ago. When the founding fathers wrote the constitution and bill of rights they obviously couldn't predict the future. They didn't know what kinds of arms the second amendment would…
- 162.
The letter of the law should override its spirit
For
- As my opponent has forfeited again I restate my original post. As my opponent, who bears the burden of proof has failed to provide a single argument, address a single counter-argument, has forfeited every round and has failed to explain his absence in person or via a third…
- My opponent has again forfeited. I restate my original argument.
Against
- I negate the topic "When in conflict, the letter of the law ought to take priority over the spirit of the law." I'd like to do a classic Lincoln-Douglas debate. Please signpost (Make sure you address the arguments you're arguing against) and have a value and criterion in your…
- 163.
The right to be forgotten should exist on internet searches
For
- My opponent states that not all forms of intrusion are crude, Of course not all forms are crude, and if that is the case then in most cases people would not try to have it removed. If someone uploads a photo of you playing hockey with them, then odds are you will not want to…
- I will be running for the positive side of the "right to be forgotten" on Internet searches. Each and every single human being has a secret. The exact definition of a secret is: "not known or seen or not meant to be known or seen by others." I would like to put extra emphasis…
Against
- Quote from my opponent "Of course not all forms are crude." He is agreeing to my argument to some extent, but he also made the statement of saying "The simple matter is that this is a breach of privacy and should be illegal." Which made him contradict his earlier statement.…
- My opponent made the statement of saying the breach of privacy should be illegal. I am here to say that not all forms of intrusion are necessarily crude. We have many criminals running on the streets. They are outsmarting the government on a daily basis. We use surveillance to…
- 164.
All felonies should be treated equally
For
- Felonies, decribed in lawinfo. com as "any crime punishable by more than one year in prison or by death for capital offenses". In this debate, it should be argued wether or not all Felonies including, but not limited to Assult, Rape, Murder, and Illegal Possesion of Narcotic…
Against
- A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking.
- Extend my arguments, please.
- 165.
Probable cause should justify searching students in K-12 schools
For
- Probable cause, the 4th amendment, search and seizer. School administrators face severe threats to school safety and are simultaneously held increasingly accountable to the public and policymakers to keep students safe. To keep schools safe, most administrators err on the side…
- *Side note: I believe all kids are good. There are some who are more susceptible to making bad decisions. Who isn't? But, the amount of bad decision a kid is prone to can be reduced when the source can be identified. Probable cause should be alright in school K-12 to aide in…
Against
- Police agencies have traditionally provided services to schools, but it has only been over the past 20 years where the practice of assigning police officers to schools on a full-time basis has become more wide-spread. Criminal justice and education officials sought to expand…
- Hey, can someone please accept this so I won't be bored. And please respond with an sophisticated response relating to the topic.
- 166.
Weed should be decriminalized
For
- I never actually mentioned legalizing weed, although I am completely for it. I asked if you believe it should be decriminalized which is not quite the same thing. If it were to be decriminislied the only effect it would really have on society would be that when a person is…
- Weed should decriminalised do you agree?
Against
- In conclusion, I would like to add that marijuana leg./dec. would only available to adults aged 21 and over, so for students, it would still be illegal. If this happens, adults would do it more often and introduce it to their kids. The kids, or students, would smoke pot enough…
- My opponent has forfeited the previous round, so I don't have anything to argue against.
- 167.
Schools should be allowed to search students without warrants
For
- I am going to organize my argument on three contingencies, labels alphabetically. But first, I would like to proved some simple definitions that suit the overall topic. Civic Virtue: "Civic virtue is the cultivation of habits of personal living that are claimed to be important…
- I believe that schools are entitled to check students for contraband or weapons, so long as they do not go too in-depth with searches. For example: a school should be aloud to search cars in the school parking lot, however they should not be allowed to strip search students.…
Against
- Debate accepted
- (Sorry for forfeiting last round, I will put my rebuttals in the next round) Safety Vs. Liberty has always been an issue, especially at schools. I believe that schools should obtain a warrant though before searching a students property for the following reasons: A. Allowing…
- 168.
The FCC violates the First Amendment
For
- I don't think you can delete whole debates. I guess we just have to hope no one votes on this one. Send me the challenge whenever you're ready. DO NOT VOTE ON THIS DEBATE!!!!
- Hi Toored, You have very good arguments, but they didn't address the topic. I'll admit that my first sentence might have been misleading, but I am debating over whether FCC censorship is justified, and whether their control over media content violates the first amendment. So,…
Against
- Mmmmm, it says we need to finish this debate before I can challenge you again. I am with you, lets hope no one votes. Once you finish off the last round I can challenge you.
- Sorry about that. I prepared another debate about the virtues of the FCC but to challenge you we need to finish this debate. Would you mind deleting it as to not mess with our win ratios. Then I can send you the challenge.
- 169.
Websites depicting homophobic material should be censored or removed
For
- Sadly, hun, I must deeply apologize; I feel horrible for having to do this. I simply don't have time to complete this debate or research the facts I need. I was really looking forward to seeing it through. But, tomorrow is the beginning of my new semester and I have eighty-odd…
- (( Keep in mind that I'm not a horrible person, that I do not wish to form grudges, and that this is all for fun. )) Let me, first of all, clarify what it is I am talking about. I propose that websites displaying content and/or videos that are incessantly insulting, bashing,…
Against
- You propose that all material that offends the LGBTQ community should be 'censored or removed', I assume you mean that they should be censored or removed by the government, and not self censorship. An important philosophy strong in American society of the past and for those…
- I know the feeling. I missed a few debates when I went back to school, almost missed one today when I took photos of Bill Clinton early this morning.
- 170.
The United States should ban assault rifles
For
- C1. A ban would save lives. Put simply assault weapons are designed for assault, therefore their proliferation should be prohibited in law. To put things into the general context of gun crime within the United States every year 17,000 people are killed, 70 percent of them with…
- Round 1- AcceptanceRound 2- ArgumentsRound 3- Rebuttals and last points
Against
- I accept.
- In this debate, Pro supports the ban of Assault weapons; however, he cites evidence mainly pointing to handguns, not Assault weapons in particular. 1. A ban will not stop or slow assault weapon and gun crimes in general He says that Assault weapons in particular cause 9-100…
- 171.
The federal government should legalize industrial hemp
For
- My opponent made the statement that said this resolution was failed because the Federal Government does not have the power to do this, but when we look at what the Federal Government really is we see that yes they do have this power. The Federal Government is broken up into…
- Guess what we could give millions of people the nutrition that they need, cut down on deforestation, bring back the agricultural industry, and you won't even get high in the process. It's time that America faced the facts Hemp is a vital and needed resource that America needs…
Against
- The resolution is that the US Federal Government should legalize industrial hemp. I oppose this resolution. My opponent contends that the Federal Government should do something that the Federal Government has no power to do. Section 8 of Article One of the Constitution of the…
- My opponent now wishes to rely on Concurrent Powers to show that the Federal Government of the USA has the power to legalise industrial hemp. In doing so, he is saying that one of those concurrent powers is the power to make and enforce laws. He claims that this means that the…
- 172.
Criminal justice should prioritize retribution over rehabilitation
For
- 26 Minutes to make a complete vote worthy conclusion? I'm game. In conclusion: More emphasis should be placed on retribution over rehabilition. This is supported by two core facts I've proven below. - Rehabilitation Programs for violent offenders such as Sex Offenders do not…
- 1. Felony List Defense" For a retributive system, all crimes must be punished. Since he's restricting himself to his list of crimes, he's rendering his argument irrelevant." The above is a falsehood that my opponent is attempting to pass off as truth. At no point did I agree…
Against
- 1. Yama's China argumentYama proposes that the US adopt a system similar to China. In China, 68 crimes make one eligible for capital punishment [1]. China's own goal is much less violent than Yama's proposed system is. They say, on their website [2],"People can be reformed. The…
- 1. Yama's restrictive list of feloniesYama begins his arguments by keeping "crime" to a select list of punishable things, and completely disregards other crime in doing so. For a retributive system, all crimes must be punished. Since he's restricting himself to his list of…
- 173.
Flag burning should be legal
For
- My opponent has not responded, I shall withhold further arguments until answered.
- This could have been a clever tactic in order to attack the constitutionality of flag burning in Iran, but you don't actually attack the constitutionality of the action. But when we look at this statement what we can see is that Flags have been burned and that people did not…
Against
- First and foremost I look forward to this round, now onto the refutations. "Well, I will be honest with you, I was expecting someone living in the United States, but I shall put up with your conditions because I like you. Please understand that if you live in the United States,…
- Pleco, my title is Cherymenthol the Omnipotent. I am taking this debate on the grounds that you swear you will not alter the words of the resolution, which is, "Flag burning in your [meaning my] country, and even justifiable." My thesis is simple and sweet. 1) Flag Burning is…
- 174.
Police should use tasers only as a last resort
For
- Here is the source you wanted about Llandudno and it's existence. http://www.llandudno.com... "They tazed him for what he said, if my opponent had their audio on. Therefore, my opponent is doubly incompetent. " First of all, I never said my audio wasn't on. Nonetheless, it is…
- I will begin by refuting my opponents case. First of all my opponent says that Llandudno, North Wales is not a real place. On the contrary, it is very beautiful, and in fact, real. http://images.google.com... He then goes on to say that, "last resort is also the name of a…
Against
- "Here is the source you wanted about Llandudno and it's existence. http://www.llandudno.com...; This source is not reliable because it is not a government website. My opponent could have made that website while debating to prove his point true. The victim was tazed as a first…
- First of all, google images is not a reliable source at all, i need the link of the official website of the city, which i do not see on google images. Therefore my opponent is incompetent and wrong. Also, in the video, they used tazing as a first resort. They tazed him for what…
- 175.
Most federal programs are unconstitutional
For
- It is to my disappointment that my opponent did not provide an argument for the second round, because until he does give a rebuttal I am unable to continue this debate. This, I think, does let us all see weakness and a lacking of credibility in my opponent. But like I said, I…
- Firstly, on the note of the Preamble to the US Constitution, while it does state that is our responsibility to provide for the common welfare, I must remind the opposition that it is "the people" who establish such welfare. While the government is designed to oversee this…
Against
- I would like to make a sincere apology to my opponent for my forfeiting the previous round. Simply put, I was busy with school work and lost track of time--nothing more, nothing less. I will not waste precious time and space commenting on my opponent's ad hominem attack that…
- I will be arguing against the resolution, "Federal programs are unconstitutional." The topic, as I see it, refers to federal programs in general, weighing the relevance of them and whether they are unconstitutional or not. Allow me to start with an analogy. Let's say you're…
- 176.
Crimes should always have identifiable victims
For
- You do bring up some important points: "It's better to prevent a victim than to deal with it after a person has been hurt in some way." But at what point do you "prevent" victims or not? Knives have the potential to injure or kill someone, but are you going to arrest everyone…
- Just to make everything clear with this subject, I'll list a few definitions:Victim: a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. Crime: an action that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is…
Against
- Close
- extend
- 177.
The US Constitution should be interpreted as a living document
For
- To start off, this is obviously my first debate on here and I have no experience "formally" debating subjects, so please stick with me. I will argue that the United States Constitution (now to be called the Constitution) should be interpreted as a living document rather than as…
- I appreciate the challenge, and hope to answer your questions and then present my points. Question 1) Will our definitions contradict each other or should we establish a set definition? I dont want this to be a debate of a definition, I want a simple debate over this topic.…
Against
- Alright, this is a little disappointing and unexpected. I was hoping for a good debate, and failed to recieve one. Carry over all of my previous arguments, and vote Con due to forfeit. Thanks, Brenavia
- Unfortunatly for my opponent, he has missed the deadline to make his next speech. I ask that voters not count this against him, and allow the debate to continue. I will restate my main points and then I'll be done. 1. Pro suggests allowing the intent of the Founding Fathers to…
- 178.
Music piracy should be legal
For
- So...my opponent forfeited his final arguments. I urge a vote for Pro's side, because: Con forfeited the last round. Con did not touch my first two points: 1. Work-for-hire contracts are BS 2. Record executives b*tching about lost sales are the ones really hurting the industry…
- Okay, are ya ready? Here we go! My opponent offers this definition of "music piracy": "Illegal duplication of sound recordings" Whereas my definition offered in the first round does not include the act of duplicating CDs or DVDs and reselling them. There are two reasons why I…
Against
- Ok well my definition differs. Definitionof music piracy : Illegal duplication of sound recordings. I don't see why this wouldn't involve counterfeit cd's and the like as they are as just as a much of a problem as programs like limewire etc. So you said in your third point that…
- Welcome I would firstly lkke to eductate that music piracy is stealing and thoughtout the centurys stealing has been viewed as wrong and un ethical so why should anything change now? Music artist put there life into there music. why should we take away there music and there…
- 179.
The right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed
For
- "you have yet to argue my legitimate interpretation of the resolution" I believe I have but you continue to spin it to mean something predominantly evil. The way I understood the Resolution I devised to be was that Pro would mean FOR gun rights and Con would be AGAINST Gun…
- You misunderstand me, my fault for not being specific in round one. I am only talking about every US citizen having the rights to OWN guns not to rob banks with them or even use them in anything else than self defense. the topic says the right of the people to keep and bear…
Against
- Straight down from his last speech… I. Minors- "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms doesn't apply to Minors until their independent."--> -The problem with this argument is that minors ARE people and when the constitution says people AND the resolution says people,…
- "You misunderstand me, my fault for not being specific in round one." --> Perhaps I 'misunderstood you', but the fact of the matter is that I interpreted the resolution in a completely legitimate way. However, you have yet to argue my legitimate interpretation of the resolution…
- 180.
Breed-specific legislation should be banned
For
- Wow, well done, been a while since i had to pull research.R1- According to the National Canine Research Council "Dog bite statistics include a range of types of Dog bites. The vast majority.... they fail to accurately show which dogs bite, why dogs bite, or just how frequently…
- Across the United States there is a trend that local governments, normally city or sometimes counties whereby they will prevent the ownership of certain types of dogs, most notably the "pit bull " breed. As a pretty conservative follow I am morally outraged at the governments…
Against
- Dog Bite Statistics While it is true that many dog bite statistics might provide only some information, the information that is not provided is not necessary for legislators to come to the reasonable conclusion that certain restrictions should be placed on particularly…
- Numerous states and local governments have enacted breed-specific legislation to ban the ownership of certain types of dogs or provide restrictions on the conditions of ownership. The purpose of this legislation is to protect public safety by controlling ownership of…
- 181.
Media organizations should not report on ongoing court cases
For
- Debate challenges on DDO confuse me immensely. In the WODC, there are no round structure specifications Since this is technically considered the first round of debating for the WODC, I will follow my usual format of framing arguments in the first round. 1. Media can complicate…
- For WODC 2016.
Against
- My position on this issue is that there is no harm caused by media organizations reporting on ongoing court cases; therefore, there is no reason to believe that they should not do so. If I can negate your arguments, I have proven my case. Rebuttal #1: Complicating mattersThere…
- We were supposed to have three debating rounds, not including acceptance, so we'll have to put the final round in the comments. The round structure will go as follows:2. Opening arguments3. RebuttalsComments: DefenseVoters: Please take note of this, although it normally isn't…
- 182.
The legal drinking age in America should be lowered to 18
For
- I absolutely disagree . Drinking ages should lower to age 18 because its RATIONAL. 1) drinking at the age of 18 should be allowed because it makes sense to allow a 18 year old to drink a beer if he is legible to serve in war.Tennesee Law Professor ,Glenn Reynolds said, "If you…
- I accept.muwahhahahahahahaaahahahahahahahahahhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Against
- So you forfeited the round you went ready... but anyways I'm guessing your agreeing with me the drinking age shouldnt be reduced to 18 year old.
- I think that the age should stay at 21 because at 18 years of age you havent quite matured yet and your just now getting your liscence to drive with out a parents supervison. It is illegal to drink and drive for all ages, so i say that to say this if your attending a party,…
- 183.
The legal drinking age should match the military enlistment age
For
- if a boy/girl can possibly die in a horrific way at such a young age, then I believe they should have the right to have a drink with friends or a parent, so long as they are responsible.
- also when enlisted 18 is the age to buy a firearm so long as you were trained.
Against
- There are, however, many other things that people are not allowed to do until they turn 21. (e.g. gambling, buying a handgun, or adopting a child) (1) These decisions require a greater sense of maturity and responsibility. Drinking should also be grouped with these because of…
- 184.
Juveniles charged with violent felonies should be tried as adults
For
- Road map: I will first attack my opponent's case than move on to rebuild my own My opponent states "In order for our society to truly achieve its best, we need the use of these juveniles in the future." we need juveniles, correct but it would be best not to have these juveniles…
- Littleton, Colorado, two students at Columbine High School go into the school, armed and planning to blow up the entire school, although they did not succeed in blowing up the school, they killed thirteen people, the majority of them high school students who didn't even get a…
Against
- My opponent is sticking to his claim that incapacitation and deterrence will be beneficial to society. He says, "The juvenile system will have a smaller sentence, we cannot count on maybe two years of rehabilitation to so call 'fix' kids who killed someone, and it will not…
- Road Map: First, I will attack my opponent's case and then, rebuild my own. In today's debate, my opponent is focused on the value of safety and he sees that this can be achieved through incapacitation and deterrence, which is essentially scaring the victim out of committing…
- 185.
Juvenile detention should be replaced with rehabilitation programs
For
- Well this is most unfortunate... I suppose I get somewhat of a default bye for this round. No jail time for minors... loop-de-doo... 100 characters...
- I'm taken aback by my opponent's lack of response... I stand by my previously mentioned assertions and hope for a rebuttal in the future...
Against
- Well, since nothing I say can possibly win this round at this point, I beseech you sit back, relax, and listen to a tale of an accountant named Jenarxo. Jenarxo was an ordinary man. He was the type of ordinary so ordinary that he merely disappeared off the ordinariness charts…
- 186.
Louder fire alarms should be mandated in workplaces with over 10 employees
For
- Are you kidding? They wouldn't let you evacuate the building until the fire actually spread to your floor? How did that work then? "Excuse us for disturbing you, Mr Big Boss Man, sir. A fire has broken out on the floor below us and we can see that it is quite localised at the…
- Most modern fire alarms combine a siren with a recorded message which usually goes something like this: "A fire has been reported in the building. Please leave by the nearest exit as soon as possible" and this message is repeated ad-infinitum until the alarm is either…
Against
- No, we were not to evacuate until the "alarm" reached our floor. This would occur if the fire was maybe a floor or two below us, or if it the fire system showed that the fire was spreading quickly. One of the primary reasons for this, was because there were only so many…
- While it is true that many people will wait when they hear a fire alarm and do other things, my opponent makes no reasonable argument that if the fire alarms are belligerent that they will speed people up. When I worked in a 9 story office building (on the 9th floor, of…
- 187.
The right to be forgotten should not be a civil right
For
- The "Right to be Forgotten" should not become a civil right because it restricts simple freedoms. The system can be abused. As already implemented in Europe, more than half of the cases for the Right to be Forgotten are being rejected. This is a matter between privacy, public…
Against
- My opponent has once again forfeited. Extend arguments.Good luck on any further rounds. :)
- My opponent has forfeited the round. Extend arguments.Thanks once again for opening this subject to debate. :)
- 188.
Federal health insurance mandates should be deemed constitutional
For
- Car insurance is mandatory; why not health insurance too.
- Federal mandates are common; no problem with insurance mandates
Against
- Commerce clause does not authorize health insurance mandates
- Constitution does not grant power for health insurance mandates
- 189.
The Second Amendment should not be repealed
For
- Violent crime in the 1990's was high, But crime occurred more in eastern cities like New York City. The eastern side of the country had less guns and a city will have less guns than the country. The east part of America has less guns than the North, South, And West. High crime…
- This is very true about many countries that the lower the crime, The more guns the people have.
Against
- There is absolutely no truth to the myth that more guns mean more crime, I have researched this subject in 1990 half of all american homes had guns now it is a bout 1/3 or about 37% a radical reduction, The fact that so many homes no longer have guns, Has been the reason crime…
- The second amendment made a lot of sense in a fronteer agrarian society, In a post industrial 21 century technological world it is madness to keep it around, Totally dangerous for absolutely no rational reason
- 190.
The Citizens United ruling undermines democracy in the United States
For
- I thank my partner for the last submission. I have presented one example of how the Citizens United decision will harm our democratic traditions, and this example has not been rebutted. To recap: If the freedom of speech should be extended to groups such as corporations and…
- Many thanks to my debate partner for proposing this discussion. I am rarely afforded an opportunity to defend my views on the subject against a heartfelt opposing argument, and so I am looking forward to better understanding the "other side" in this matter. It is rare that any…
Against
- I would like to begin by emphasizing my gratitude for my opponent"s surprisingly cogent and unique response. Seeing such an unorthodox approach to the landmark case is amazingly refreshing and will indubitably provide for some fantastic angles of argumentation further in the…
- I'll let my opponent begin since I am negative.
- 191.
Flag desecration should always be legal
For
- I think we can agree that I may skip sections 1-3, them being agreed upon. 4) Quote: It was not an unnecessary section, it was an opening statement. Let us move on. 5) First Amendment: I apologize, I wrote it late last night, and that was a typographical error, for lack of a…
- Thank you for your very thoughtful response! 1) Burden of proof: Sure... But you have yet to negate my resolution. 2) Definitions: I agree with all of them, we may proceed. 3) Notes: 1. I agree. 2. I agree. 3. Yes, I worded it that way on purpose. We may proceed. 4) Quote: I'm…
Against
- I shall negate my opponent by corresponding with the numerical ordering he provided earlier in the round: 1) Burden of Proof: My opponent accepts the Burden of Proof. Yes, I do have to negate the resolution. 2) Definitions: My opponent agrees with all of my definitions. 3)…
- I shall negate the resolution, "Flag Desecration should always be legal. " ===================== Burden of Proof: As the Instigator and Pro, my opponent has the Burden of Proof to affirm the resolution. If I can prove otherwise, the resolution shall be negated.…
- 192.
Youth offenders should be imprisoned
For
- Well... thanks.
- Oh come on.
Against
- Ist point: If you imprison youth offender they will have no education which is in human rights, and they will more likely to rebel, They have young minds to do such things ex: a 10 year old guy shoots his uncle and he said he said it was just a toy.
- 3rd point: prison doesnt have education but recreational activities only. They should have education. There is this 12 year old guy who shoots his uncle and he said he thought it was only a toy. They are young to understand things like this. Have pity for them. They are…
- 193.
The US Constitution should be interpreted as a living document
For
- I would like to apologize to my opponent and concede this debate. I had a family mater that I had to tend to and was no able to post for rounds 2 or 3. If my opponent would like to have a second debate, I am open to that idea, but as far as this debate -- I would like to…
- The United States Constitution was written in such a way as to be a flexible an ever-changing document so that future generations can interpret the intent of the writer's broad and yet dynamic framework for the country. The founders of the country, specifically those who wrote…
Against
- I would be up for another debate though probably not immediately, I will let you know. to touch on the technology issue, I don't see technology changing the fundamental principals in the constitution. Obviously though it is something to think about for our next debate. Thank you
- Unfortunately my opponent has once again forfeited. This is really unfortunate as I feel this topic is very important. It is vital to understanding the proper role of Government. Without an argument I can say no more for this round.
- 194.
Juveniles should be tried as adults for serious crimes
For
- Because you are young when committing a crime should you be held responsible for your actions
Against
- Con
- Extend
- 195.
The United States should accept International Criminal Court jurisdiction
For
- np.
- sure, ill send u the corrections through the message system, and I'll check if I have any spare cards u can use.
Against
- This is not a real debate can someone comment on m first contention and make rebuttla against it thanks! I negate; The United States ought to submit to the jurisdiction of an international court designed to prosecute crimes against humanity. To prosecute is to bring legal…
- thanks
- 196.
Capital punishment should be abolished
For
- "thett3"- Thank you for accepting! Also, thank you for the clarity, and yes, it is U.S. specific. Counter- refutations: 1) • "an innocent convicted to life without parole has a significantly slighter chance of walking free than someone sentenced to die ever does." You are…
- Slogan: En eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. Capitol punishment should be abolished because of a high possibility for error, the fact that it is an unethical practice, and its high cost. 1) Capitol punishment should be abolished because of its high possibility for…
Against
- Thanks for the debate Pro. For clarity, I will assume that the resolution is US specific unless otherwise informed. I'll first refute my Opponents case, then refute my own. 1. InnocenceTurn the Columbia Law study, this only shows that our current system works in protecting the…
- Forfeit= I win.
- 197.
Recreational marijuana should be legalized
For
- Con begins by suggesting that pot cannot be legalized, because people might smoke and drive. First, extend my argument that drinking and driving is infinitely more dangerous than smoking and driving [1] yet alcohol remains legal. For Con's argument to have merit, he would have…
- Smoking pot is a victimless crime; that is it does not infringe upon anybody else's rights. Instead people have the right to exercise their personal freedom to smoke. It is not the government's responsibility to legislate morality. The government exists to protect people's…
Against
- Thank you for your response. In pro's argument she says: "Plus, it would be unrealistic and unproductive to criminalize anything that could be potentially harmful." It can be harmful in more ways than you think. We now have aproblem with drinking and driving. Can you imagine…
- The legalization of a harmful substince can damage family communities. Acording to the centre for disease control some effects of marijuana are : -short-term memory impairment and slowness of learning. -impaired lung function similar to that found in cigarette smokers.…
- 198.
Freedom of speech does not apply on privately owned forums
For
- >The Constitution permits freedom of speech. I do not see where it says anything about Censorship. Please point me to this spot. I'll do better than that. I'll point you to this exchange between a complaining "censored" poster asking advice from a legal expert at About.com and…
- In my experience with largely political message boards all over the internet, in my experience the posters who intend to cause the most trouble are the ones who assert that their "Freedom of Speech" is being violated if posts are deleted, or if they are called on the carpet for…
Against
- "I'll do better than that" Well, it wasn't that better. Lawyers are some of the best manipulators too. I want to see a document that has the freedom of speech and the censorship part, on the Constitution included. Also, the Supreme Court (the Judicial part of US law) has…
- The Constitution permits freedom of speech. I do not see where it says anything about Censorship. Please point me to this spot. I can't go into someone's personal property because it is the right to privacy "http://www.law.cornell.edu...; This is the Griswold vs. Conneticut…
- 199.
Rehabilitation should be valued over retribution in the criminal justice system
For
- First what is justice?Justice: http://oxforddictionaries.com... [mass noun] just behaviour or treatment:a concern for justice, peace, and genuine respect for people the quality of being fair and reasonable:the justice of his case the administration of the law or authority in…
Against
- See above comments relevant to my opponent forfeiting his rounds.
- Since my opponent has forfeited his last round, every argument he has made and that I have contested go in the con's favor. I still urge a con ballot.
- 200.
Affirmative action by race in education should be illegal
For
- merry Christmas
- WHY DOES THIS ALWAYS HAPPEN TO ME
Against
- Black people and minorities in general have been socially, political and economically disenfranchised from American societies for centuries. Might I remind you upon until some 50 years ago African-American people could not enter certain establishments or go to certain schools…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?