History Debate Topics for Students — page 3
776 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 101.
Compromises delayed women's suffrage in the United States
For
- Type your rebuttal in the final round.
- Based on my subsequent information, you'll see that offering 3/5 of a vote to women is actually quite generous. First of all, the main role of the government is to protect its citizens and enforce its laws to achieve this. I would like to first mention that women are not…
Against
- Its not working
- Its erroring I can't see your argument
- 102.
Modern people are better than our forefathers
For
- Technology have improved us than our fore fathers.
Against
- Vote fo me doe
- Old timers did the real work.
- 103.
Abraham Lincoln cared about the Union more than slaves
For
- At the beginning of Lincoln's presidency, he wanted reunification at any cost. He strove to avoid a civil war over the issue of slavery and urged to seceded states to rejoin the rejoin the Union. He felt strongly that saving the Union was his primary job. In his inaugural…
- First of all im only 13 and I SUCK at debating Let's keep it nice :) When we think of Abraham Lincoln we usually think that he is well-known for freeing the slaves in the United States. We see him as a strong leader who wanted to abolish slavery from the start of his…
Against
- That's IS true. But to save the union he had to run the mile. It was his JOB to save the Union. Outside of work I think he knew(by the end of the war) slavery had to be stopped. In fact, the war was basically over when the 13th Amendment happen(this freed ALL slaves). What…
- I will assume we're talking about the civil war. Abraham, trying to save the union, was the first reason why we were fighting. Yes, we WERE fighting to save the union, but this was not possible with many variables, such as: Economic and social differences between the North and…
- 104.
Shakespeare did not write the plays attributed to him
For
- How seriously 'Seriously' be taken? Not very.Unfortunately, S has chosen to display a somewhat listless and amateurish form of mockery that bis frankly embarrassing. There is also a tinge of 'the mind like a steel trap' symptom - once it slams shut, there's really no reopening?…
- The existence of bananas would be a truly interesting topic - in another and more relevant debate. Shoving comedy videos as proof of anything is absurd to say the least. Imagine how satisfying it would have been had 'Seriously' bothered to read and absorb what was actually…
Against
- Bananas. http://www.youtube.com...
- http://www.youtube.com... Does eating a ripened (or yellow) banana provide more nutrition than an unripened (or green) banana? Let the debate begin! * Unripened/Green Bananas. 1.) Unripe bananas contain about 20-25% more starch than ripe bananas. What are the pros and cons? *…
- 105.
Amelia Earhart ran out of fuel and drowned
For
- I also found that she had a gas leak on her way over the pacific ocean. she ran out of gas and drowned
- i found out that she missed her gas stop at an island in howland. what do you think
Against
- I found that she ran into bad weather which caused her to use more gas, then she crashed and died.
- I didn't find any evidence to support that claim, but it could very likely be true.
- 106.
The United States was justified in dropping atomic bombs on Japan
For
- Burden of proof is shared.
Against
- My opponent appears to have gone AFK for the entire week.
- This is unfortunate.
- 107.
Dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was wrong
For
- I would like to bring in all aspects to the argument. first off i would like to bring up the fact that the topic states both the bombs rather than just one. The bombs that were dropped led huge crater of destruction and took the lives of many people that had no involvement in…
- !
Against
- Unfortunately, my opponent has forfeited the previous round. All arguments extended. I heavily urge a Con vote. Thank you.
- Note that my opponent must prove that the dropping of both bombs was wrong. I would like to provide some general information about America's dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Strategists in Washington were planning an all-out invasion of the main islands…
- 108.
Studying the past is essential to understanding the world today
For
- Knowledge of the past is as important as all the knowledge we are getting in our daily life.it is cause of this knowledge that we are able to develop our current knowledge to the next level.
Against
- Extend my arguments. [Voting Issues] 1) Contention I 2) Resolution is negated off of the premise that knowledge about the past is a necessity rather then just a utility. Thank you ladies and gentlemen.
- Extend my arguments. ^^ Character length.....length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length
- 109.
Rewriting historical narratives can be ethically justified
For
- Thank you, Con.Affirmative CaseA1: History can be rewritten History. History. See? I have rewritten history. I have rewritten "history", therefore I have affirmed the resolution. A2: History can be rewritten History can be defined as: a continuous, systematic narrative of past…
- Thank you defnebasbakkal for instigating this debate.Since no definitions are provided in the opening round, they will be up for debate.Since Con is starting, it seems fair that the burden of proof be shared.To make rounds even, I will await Con's initial argument.
Against
- History shouldn't be rewritten because it will effects nations culture and their values. As an example America changed the information's which is written on their history books an example of history re-written, let's go with The War of 1812 in which is often cited as a US fight…
- This house supports that history can be rewritten but we as against team don't believe this motion is right. Because we need to know our past to be better at the future
- 110.
Design flaws, not just the iceberg, caused the Titanic sinking
For
- First, I shall make a few rebuttals and then I will write a conclusion:Rebuttals Your first theory should not even have been listed at all. It is a fact that everyone with a basic knowledge of science is familiar with. When I started the debate, I did not want a theory that is…
- You misinterpreted what I wrote. At first glance, what you wrote makes complete sence. But when you really think about it, it is absolutely terrible. I did not break my rules. I wrote:"1. Sources must be cited," not "1. Sources must be cited in every single argument." I also…
Against
- *NOTE. In this round, Pro has essentially repeated everything he said in Round 3, which I have already refuted and he as already conceded to. Therefore, I will simply repeat what I said in my counter-rebuttal in Round 3.…
- ***I stand corrected! You have not provided a single source to back up your claims of the Titanic having hit an iceberg. You did not provide one source. The closest thing you provided to a source was a link to Dictionary.com explaining the definition of an iceberg, which does…
- 111.
Currency debasement was a major cause of the Roman Empire's collapse
For
- Hello there, I must regretably resign from this debate, some thing private has come up and I wont be on DDO for a week. I'd love to do this debate again with you. :)
Against
- I accept!
- Extend
- 112.
Franklin D. Roosevelt was not a great president
For
- Thank you for challenging me. I will allow you to make an argument before I respond.
- FDR is made out to be a top five president in American history. This is not the case. The New Deal did not stop or even slow down the Great Depression. Actually it hurt it. After FDR's New Deal legislation was passed, unemployment went up and the US hit another recession. What…
Against
- Con Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote…
- FDr was handsome and cured aids. And brought pens to poor people
- 113.
The Soviet Union contributed more than the United States to WWII
For
- This debate will be re-done, please Tie it.
- I'am sick and tired of people saying "America won World war 2" "America did more than the Soviet Union by Far" My starting argument is that the Soviet Union did more than the USA in World War 2, maybe not by far but they did. 5,000 Characters - each argument 48 Hours to Post an…
Against
- Finished.
- We've agreed to redo this. Please tie the debate.Thank you.
- 114.
William Howard Taft was the worst president in US history
For
- Okay so he told Teddy Roosevelt that he would follow what Roosevelt had In mind. His wife basically always told him what to do. He was awful at press relations and could barely make a statement to the press. He supported a czar like speaker of the house (Joseph Cannon) who…
- He literally did not do anything, he hated people, and he didn't even want to be president. I mean, the thing that he is most famous for is getting stuck in a bathtub!
Against
- I extend my arrguments
- Lets start with the successes of William Howard Taft 1. Dollar diplomacy allowed the US to strengthen its influence in the western hemisphere by offering to but south American debt. I also garnered the best relations with south America and helped settle the growing paranoia of…
- 115.
America has done more good than harm in history
For
- I will have to prove the America has done more good then bad over it's existence as a nation. Con will have to prove that America has done more bad then good. If you want to accept the debate then tell me in the comment section. In one week I pick who I want to debate with.…
- Well let me say something first by the greater good, sometimes you have to fight to achieve the greater good. These nation we attack all have poor human rights. There governments perform mass killings of civilians. Also you want proof that they would have lost without us in WW1…
Against
- Pro, have you forgotten what the debate is about? This debate is whether or not, America has done more good than bad over the course of history. Not, is America the best country in the world. Thus, all those links you posted about the atrocities other country's commit are all…
- WW1 Pro claims the allies won because of the US. However, he has no proof of that claim. It is very much possible that Britain could of fought of Germany, and the US could have fought off Mexico, as we have in the course of history. Pro's claim here is just a postulation. He…
- 116.
The US should have done more for Darfur
For
- The Behaviour of the Sudanese government was tantamount to Genocide
- The Chaos in Darfur is a threat to regional security
Against
- The Conflict is an internal inter-tribal conflict – arming the Darfur tribes would be better
- Intervention might destabilize the peace deal in the South
- 117.
Labor shortages were the main cause of the slave trade
For
- Start of the Slave Trade Con does not address my point about the start of slavery. My opponent simply expressed a doubt in my argument, without actually refuting any of my points. Questions are not refutations, and Con's questions could have been answered if he bothered to read…
- Rationality Con opens with a circular argument. He claims that the demand is not always rational, because the demand is not always rational; therefore people are not always rational. Based on the assumption of irrationality, Con concludes that "the demand could be small but it…
Against
- Start of the Slave Trade This is pretty shoddy history; he cites the black plague and then just cites the revival of the slave trade as its "result." Did technological advancements play a role? How about political ones? Regardless, it's hardly relevant because the slave trade…
- A few arguments: a) Demand is not always rational: People sometimes want crazy things, and sometimes do so for no apparent, clear reason. This should be clear from the fact that people are not always rational. If demand is not always rational then there will be some market for…
- 118.
Southern states should have a right to self-determination
For
- The right of self-determination, or independence, is protected in the United Nations Geneva Convention, so that right should be given to all peoples and nations, including the people of the South. My definition of nation is the Biblical and historical definition, that a nation…
Against
- Well thats dissapointing. Guess my curse worked. V-vote me I guess.
- Well, I guess I should post mine. Nation "a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory. " Along with the fact a majority of people would unlikely to leave the Union, and it would take a…
- 119.
The League of Nations was the main cause of World War II
For
- True, it is not the cause of WW2 but if you look back to the debate is: 'the REASON for WW2 was the League of Nations. For this I will use the acronym LoN for League of Nations. I agree with the point about Britain's policy of appeasement in the 1930s but that doesn't mean that…
- I am arguing that the League Of Nations, set up in 1919 by Woodrow Wilson, was the main reason for the start of WW2. I am arguing for. I want an interesting debate so I have kept it to 3 rounds. This means points will have to be kept short as first round is acceptance and…
Against
- "The League of Nations did not cause World War 2" Con just agreed with me. Cause and Reason are synonyms. "he League was a strong power, sorting out many world problems and sorting out crises like the Bulgaria crisis 1923. The League failed to do anything in Manchuria in 1931…
- The League of Nations did not cause World War 2, Germany's invasion of Poland and the Treaty of Versailles. It is true that the League of Nations failed to do what they were supposed to, but it didn't cause the war. It just didn't stop the WW2 from taking place, therefore it is…
- 120.
The Cultural Revolution benefited China and the world
For
- The Cultural Revolution was a gain for China and the world as it proved a lesson to revolutionary thinkers on combating liberalism and the continuation of class struggle even within a socialist nation on the path to Communism. I. The Cultural Revolution was the solution to a…
- Debate is open to anyone. Benifiet: Something that promotes or enhances well-being. Cultural Revolution: The social-political movement that took place between 1966 and 1976 in China, led by Chairman Mao Tse Dong.
Against
- I accept.
- No, I mean you've made me question my very position and case. I now support your side. Thank you for your time and thanks for giving me the chance to rethink one of my beliefs.
- 121.
The Ribbentrop-Molotov pact was a necessary evil for Allied victory
For
- It's nice to see someone with historical knowledge vastly superior to my own. I feel honoured to debate a person of your education level.The resolution of this debate is 'On balance, the RIbbentrop-Molotov pact was a necessary evil for allied victory'.RefutationWhen you bring…
- IntroductionIn this debate, I will seek to prove that the Ribentrop-Molotov pact (otherwise known as the Hitler-Stalin pact) was necessary for the preservation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and consequently, the allied forces.Rules of conductRound one:Opening…
Against
- BA degree in Military History here, so unfortunately I'm going to curbstomp your facts on this one.Primarily: The Ribbentrop-Molotov (Nazi-Soviet) Pact was NOT a necessary requisite for Allied victory because it is what allowed Germany to effectively plan for war in the first…
- Extend all arguements. Good debate.
- 122.
The Egyptian revolution has been a success
For
- Thanks for that wonderful reply master Ahmad Opponent: I am not sure this is a valid statement since this is not backed up by facts. It is only rumours transmitted between people - I'm very sorry i didn't cite my source however a quick search in Google will tell you everything…
- A wonderful start by my veteran opponent. I personally believe that the previous government required drastic changes that couldn't have happened while former president Hosni Moubark was in power. He overstayed his visit, so to speak, by changing the constitution of Egypt. The…
Against
- Thank you for that Mr Mostafa. I will start by rebutting some of your points. Opponent: I personally believe that the previous government required drastic changes that couldn't have happened while former president Hosni Moubark was in power. -Whilst I agree with the fact that…
- Let me start by congratulating my opponent for his excellent English language skills. On the 25th of January 2011, the spark that lit the revolution in Egypt against all forms of mistreatment and mass thievery happened. The people flooded the streets with their wants for…
- 123.
The Nuremberg Trials were a fair form of justice
For
- Because my opponent used the previous round to offer his own arguments, I am going to focus this round on a rebuttal rather than constructing my own points further. I accept all of the definitions proposed by my opponent. However, there is one point that I do not accept: "Since…
- Resolved: That the Nuremberg Trials were not a true application of justice, but rather one that was heavily biased in favor of the victorious. As Pro, I will assume the burden of proof. However, I would still expect my opponent to argue in favor of the Nuremberg trials as well…
Against
- Although I am not an expert in this field, I shall try my best in negating this resolution. Resolved: That the Nuremberg Trials were not a true application of justice, but rather one that was heavily biased in favor of the victorious. Since the affirmative side did not provide…
- In ths round, I will first refute my opponent's contention and, if time allows, defend my own case. Definitions: On the question or not whether Nuremberg Trials are just or not, it is crucial for us to examine the actions that happened during the Second World War. After all,…
- 124.
Richard Nixon's legacy should not be defined by Watergate
For
- I am still waiting.
- No comment.
Against
- Richard Nixon should be guilty and he was clearly in violation of his rights bestowed upon to him by we the people. he spied on us and was clearly not in acceptance with the rights and privileges given to him by the people he stabbed in the back and spied on. it was his own…
- 125.
Decisive battles have shaped history more than political events
For
- Spanish ArmadaIn August 1588, one of the largest fleets ever made was put together. The Spanish Armada of over 130 warships were poised to invade Great Britain. Britain's navy had only about 50 ships to defend the island. Each Spanish ship also held some 300 soldiers. This was…
- Battle of GettysburgThis battle is considered the turning point in the American Civil War. Just like Stalingrad, the battle started out with a rougly small force. A Union cavalry brigade commanded by Brigadier General John Buford and a division of Condeferate infantry commanded…
Against
- The Battle of Austerlitz Napoleons 'perfect battle' in which absolutely CRUSHED the Russian and Austrian forces within Europe. This battle alone ended the Third Coalition against Napoleon, solidified his alliance with Prussia at that time. It was the first and only (to the best…
- Operation Neptune / Invasion of Normandy / Operation Overlord / Omaha Beach The significance is pretty straight forward and clear. It marks the first time the Germans are unable to advance as the allied forces teamed up to liberate Vinchy France from the Axis. Not only did it…
- 126.
Scotland should face trial for colonial crimes against humanity
For
- For my closing argument I do believe Scotland should be tried for their colonial crimes for these reasons. May the best man win.
- Another thing about war crimes is mostly for that and for the war crimes of Gordon Brown (of Scotland). I definitely believe he should be tried for the war crimes he committed in Iraq.
Against
- sorry about forfeiting those round my computer is being really wierd we will have to try again somtime
- alright here i go: we should not judge the people of present by what the people of the past did if i were to arrest you for what your great great grandfather did what good would i be doing i would be arresting an innocent man.
- 127.
Margaret Thatcher was a good prime minister
For
- She defeated the Unions with their socialism, she brought the UK out of decline and made people proud to be British.
- Yes, she may have done that however anyone that brings that up that argument are just trying to find something bad to say. I think she is better known for being the 'Iron Lady'.
Against
- The wealth Thatcher brought was discriminatory and fleeting. She did indeed leave Britain "very, very much better," but only for some. If you were in London, you were fine. While outside the south of the country- especially Wales, Scotland, and Northern England- struggled.…
- She took away free milk for schoolchildren. Infamous headlines such as, "Margaret Thatcher, Milk Snatcher" came to be
- 128.
Pierre Trudeau was a good prime minister
For
- Had this debate been about character, it would have reffered to Trudeau being a good person, rather than prime minister. I can for example say for example that "MacDonald was a good prime minister" due to benefits of confederation he brought to my country, but I most certainly…
- First of the topic of this debate was not whter or not Trudeau was a good person, but whether he was a "good" prime minister, that is whether or not his service in office was benefitial to the country. Of his achievements that you have commented on you (and many others) name…
Against
- < > Then you shouldn't have made it a point to villify him. The debate is set as it is. Accept it. <> And one just as easily could could hate Trudeau and think he were an good person who was an excellect Prime Minister. < > I did not know George Washington, Abraham Lincoln or…
- < > You did not make that distinction. If you wanted to make an effective argument, you should've stated: Trudeau did not do a good job as Prime Minister. Instead, you left it open to interpretation, which I did within reason based on your debate that attacked his character,…
- 129.
Australia Day should be moved to a date all Australians celebrate
For
- Australia day may be a day for celebration but for some it is a day for mourning, why should we come together as a nation on a day where we mourn? In 2008, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd formally apologised to the Indigenous people who were forcibly removed as children from their…
- I strongly believe that the date of Australia Day should changed from the 26th of January to a different day as this is a day that the Aboriginals mourn for the loss of their rights to their land, loss of family and the loss of the right to practice their culture. While many…
Against
- Australia Day is the anniversary of the arrival of the first fleet from Great Britain. Australia Day isn't a day to celebrate the the suffering of Aboriginal people but the beginning of our nation"s story. Why should we change the day were we became a nation? changing the day…
- Australia Day is a day to celebrate because if it wasn't for white people we wouldn't have the things we have now such as shops, cars, buildings, all of us would not be here today. We introduced animals such as cows and horses. Australia wouldn't of been developed the way it is…
- 130.
The Soviet Union was genuinely communist
For
- Please excuse me I apologize for such an inconvenience. ;D The Soviet Union is DEAD it lasted from 1922-1991 just as I also have very little experience in debating as I just joined the site a few weeks ago. Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), also called (1925"52)…
- Hi I am James a 13 yr old ready for an invigorating debate! You are (correct me if wrong) saying that the Soviet union was(past tense) communist? The Soviet union is and will mostly be communist. Russia is still communist, heck a few major countries in Asia are communist. your…
Against
- You have failed to present an argument. I will assume the position of the victor, unless you make a sly comeback next round.
- My definition of communism was not incorrect. Communism is literally the phase of society where there is no state (government), currency (money) or class system (social inequality) in place. Karl Marx, the original father of Communism who hailed from Germany built the Communist…
- 131.
Abraham Lincoln was not the best president
For
- I think that Abe Linoln was not the best president as people say. If you decide to debate with me you will pick Con stating he was a good president. Enjoy
- I'm sorry about the forfeit In website #1 you had said that if he didn't go to war slavery would still exist. Slavery still exist in the United states during the Civil War. The government still let states keep slavery. Slavery would also die off too. http://s44.photobucket.com...
Against
- Extended arguments, hope my opponent returns.
- Voters before I start I want to tell you something. It is that my opponent did not but his sources thus marking him down for that. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Argument-: Website…
- 132.
19th century European imperialism was predominantly negative
For
- I will be debating why 19th century European Imperialism was predominantly negative. Round Rules and Regulations: 1 - Acceptance 2 - Positions 3 - Rebuttals and Refutations 4 - Rebuttals and Refutations (No new arguments) 5 - Closing Statements No name calling, generalizations,…
- The points in which my opponent has expended restricts his argument only to British Imperialism in Africa (not European Imperialism as a whole). It completely disregards the majority of other colonies and their mother countries. But in order to effectively refute his…
Against
- Looks like my opponent deactivated, sucks to see another member go. Regardless, I won't have much of a conclusion for if the judge is good, they don't need to read conclusions to judge the debate. So I'll thank my opponent for this interesting debate!Peace and Love
- In this round I will defend my opening arguments from my opponent"s rebuttals. Pro starts by claiming that my third source does not relate to increased literacy rates in 19th century European colonies. I used that source [1] to demonstrate the benefits of increased literacy…
- 133.
The assassinations of Kennedy and Lincoln are mysteriously linked
For
- you may think that, but why exactly are the assassinations linked 100 years apart from each other? Lincoln's being in 1863, Kennedy's being in 1963. And lets not forget that both of them were elected as Presidents 100 years apart too! Lincoln's: 1860. Kennedy's:1960. And after…
- John F. Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln's assassinations are linked in mysterious ways, and i don't think it's a coincidence.
Against
- Thank you for this chance to debate this topic with you. I do not believe that the two assassinations can possibly be connected due to the period of time between the two events. This looks closer to a "history repeats itself" kind of thing.
- http://youtu.be... There is a video for you. It takes some of the "connections" that you mentioned, and proves why they are wrong. Kind of puts a hole in your argument, doesn't it? Well, I have enjoyed this debate, and I urge the voters to vote for me, as you cannot see…
- 134.
The atomic bombings of Japan were necessary to end World War II
For
- Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary? 1: round skip 2: construction 3: rebudle 4: final statments
- That's a shame I was looking forward to this debate
Against
- I accept and affirm that the hiroshima and nagasaki bombings were not 100% justifiable.
- That's a shame. I was looking forward to this debate.
- 135.
FDR was a better president than Lincoln
For
- First, let me mention that both of these presidents had to go through some of the worst times in American History. Although Lincoln's ability to keep the union together during the civil war was remarkable - FDR handled both the Great Depression and WWII. He did this with polio,…
- Hello. I believe that FDR was a better president than Abraham Lincoln (I still think Abraham Lincoln was very good. I just think FDR was better).
Against
- My opponent has forfeited his final round.I believe the strengt hof my case warrants a vote in favor of myself and Abraham Lincoln.
- It appears that my opponent has forfeited, but I will briefly add to my case.FDR had several shortcomings as president:1) FDR authorized the forced internment of over 100,000 U.S. citizens with Japanese ancestry during WWII. These citizens were stripped of property and home and…
- 136.
John Adams was a better president than Thomas Jefferson
For
- But because I'm alive - I can be a better judge
- I think John Adams was better because he was elected first
Against
- Given that I am John Adams - just because I'm dead doesn't mean I don't have self respect
- But I get the last word....nya nya
- 137.
The United States was founded on a lie
For
- Thank you for that enlightening speech for all you said was true and your sources are very credible but it does not change the fact that even though Jefferson was anti slavery it still happened and he could not change the southern colonies/states representatives point of view…
- This county was formed on the declaration of independence with basically said Britain we are done with you however, one of the main arguments was that all men were created equal and had a god given right to govern themselves, however that left out all the women and negroes in…
Against
- Thank you for starting this debate. I hope that it can be a civil and productive exchange.First of all, the Declaration was written by Thomas Jefferson. Read the following except from the article "Thomas Jefferson and Slavery" [1]" Thomas Jefferson was a consistent opponent of…
- Rebuttal Your example of comparing a presidential election to the abolition of slavery is not correct for modern day, but it is correct historically. "I mean we all vote for our presidents correct, and just because some people voted for the losing one and the vote wasn't…
- 138.
The Secret Service was involved in the assassination of JFK
For
- Of course, just because I claim it"s open and shut, doesn"t mean that it in fact is. There. I mean that"s your link to the video" as if you couldn"t look that up yourself? You need me to hand everything over to you on a silver platter and do all the work for you when it"s all…
- You can say "non-sequitor" or whatever to make you sound smart, but. 1. The deathbed confession of E. Howard Hunt, one of the agents, said they did it. What reason would he have to lie when he was about to die? 2. SS NEVER abandons the President. They did. Completely and it's…
Against
- My opponent forfeited his round. Advance all arguments.
- My opponent accuses me of "distract[ing him] to other arguments and details," so in response to my opponent's video:"The logical explanation for the 'stand down' gesture is that the Secret Service agent was waving goodbye to his colleagues and returning to his assignment.…
- 139.
The atomic bombings of Japan were justified
For
- My opponent has jumbled some points together so I'll see if I can group these together as he had them. Contention 1: Unecissary. The fighting mindset between the two nation's were intense as both nation's feared the other and took high extremes the Japanese were terrified of…
- Alright. I will now begin my rebuttles, I will attempt to group some of my arguments that conflict with my opponent's Contentions. Contention 1: Unnecissary. My opponent uses the argument of the Soviet intervention in the war lead to their surrender, but I bring up the Japanese…
Against
- My opponent is correct in saying that the ferocity of the fighting between Japan and the USA was extreme, but the simple fact is that it is the politicians, not the soldiers, who dictate whether a country should surrender. Whilst it is true that a military coup was being…
- Some interesting points by Pro, I will now attempt to rebut them. Whilst my opponent's point is correct that all members of the cabinet would have to unanimously agree to surrender; this could be overruled by the Emperor (which was what happened on 10th August [1]). What this…
- 140.
The United States should withdraw from Iraq immediately
For
- looks like my once-opponent doesn't have an account here anymore, too bad. So I've got nothing to add.
- Ok, so I don't have anything to respond to. I guess I'll just highlight a couple things. In case we're also debating whether it was right to start the war in the first place: I actually used to be in favor of the war, and largely for the reason you gave, that Saddam was defying…
Against
- The Iraq War is, also known as Operation Iraqi Freedom, is an on-going conflict which began on March 20, 2003. The main rationale offered for the initial invasion of the country was the suspected production of weapons of mass destruction, which, in the hands of terrorists, pose…
- 141.
Britain should refuse to reclaim its former colonies
For
- And the chief might suspiciously ask: "What could you possibly want with rocks and dirty water? " And the British representative would reply: "Well, the streets of England are paved with gold and they get very slippery when it rains so we crush the rocks and spread them on the…
- The British Empire was the largest empire that ever existed covering, at its peak, around a third of the globe [1]. For hundreds of years, the British Government invested heavily in backward nations on every continent: building modern cities with electricity, sanitation,…
Against
- I thoroughly enjoyed reading your post, Brian - quite entertaining I think that it is necessary to point out that Great Britain need only take back those colonies that request re-entry into the maternal bond of Imperialism. Thence, they do not have to resume control over those…
- Greetings, Brian! This debate should be most enjoyable! : ) Good luck, have fun. I do not deem it necessary to discuss the contention, as is is very clear, "What are the benefits or the negative elements of re-accepting rogue colonies under the matronly wing of Great Britain?…
- 142.
Removing Confederate symbols, names, and places is unnecessary
For
- Well I'm not quite sure how to respond to this one so I will consider this a conclusion round summarizing each of our points to make it clearer to readers. 1. It is destructive to an entire regions history and to the men who died fighting for their homes. 2.There could be very…
- I apologize for getting sidetracked but for these kinds of issues, it's not easy to stay on track because of how intertwined the history and causes of the war relate to today and the current situation. But let's return to the present, my point for this post will be the dire…
Against
- 1 These anti-union and often anti-not white symbols placed at government institutions is a constant reminder that the government does not believe this nation is, one, under 17 bars and 50 stars. 2 Losers of war are often erased from history. The Confederacy should feel lucky to…
- "If we take the widest and wisest view of a Cause, there is no such thing as a Lost Cause, because there is no such thing as a Gained Cause. We fight for lost causes because we know that our defeat and dismay may be the preface to our successors" victory, though that victory…
- 143.
Gavrilo Princip caused the outbreak of World War I
For
- Yes i do agree. But only because Austria wanted Bolivia and the people of Serbia were not agreeing my argument is clear Gavrilo was unhappy because of what The Austrian-Hungarian empire wanted to do. He then planed to assassinate him. But i am realizing that there were other…
- Did WW1 Start because of Gavrilo Princip. Gavrilo Assassinated Franz Ferdinand which coused The Austrian-Hungarian empire against Serbia to reclaim Bosnia. Then The other Countries Allies Joined In. Do you think that The Assassination Of Archduke Franz Ferdinand started WW1
Against
- I would like to clarify the proposition to a greater extent then previously mentioned: It queries whether Gavrilo Princip was the root cause of World War 1. Gavrilo Princip was a mercenary and bourgeoisie fellow who worked for the Unification or Death organization. When he…
- I'd like to start by initiating some of the social and political attitudes towards the much reputed Franz Ferdinand, before following with a systemic breakdown of the assassination per se. Throughout Franz Ferdinand's upbringing, he never received the respect and admiration of…
- 144.
Alexander the Great was the most influential person in history
For
- the lands split up because different people were fighting over who will rule the empire. on Alex death bed they asked to whom do you leave the your throne and he said "to the strongest". so naturally every one wanted to take his place. Jesus shouldn't even be mentioned in this…
- Alexander was before Jesus time yes Jesus established the Christian church but Alexander united lands! Alexander conquered the Ashamed Persian Empire, including Anatolia, Syria, Phoenicia, Judea, Gaza, Egypt, Bactria, and Mesopotamia, and extended the boundaries of his own…
Against
- i think my opponent didn't read my argument, i NEVER said that he was the "son of God" i don't believe that at all, I'm not a Christian, I'm far from it, i don't think God even has children, because then he wouldn't be a God. What I said was that Jesus INFLUENCED and won HEARTS…
- So what if Alex was before Jesus?, that doesn't determine anything, besides that information about him is harder to find... and Alex didn't "unite" the lands, he just conquered them, keep in mind that the lands he "united" were Alex's enemies, like the Persian Empire. And I'm…
- 145.
WWII could not have been won without US support
For
- Japan had low oil after the US refused to continue trading with them. If they did not revoke the trade deal Japan would have oil plenty. The Italian campaign was harder than you thought. Even with US support the Allies struggled out break out of the Salerno area and struggled…
- Without US withdraw of oil they gave Japan, The Japanese would be unstoppable. Britain received a huge amount of Lend Lease equipment and ammo, Food etc. The Japanese would never have taken China cause of China 500 million pop to Japan 70 mil. Japan would never be defeated…
Against
- Japan had low resources regardless of American intervention China was too hard to tack no matter what. The Italian campaign was pretty easy im sorry to put it bluntly. Briatin destroyed Italy with colonial troops. The German Afrika corps weren't that good either. The Allies…
- Japan did not have enough oil and resources in the first place, Again China was winning by 1943 and USSR destroyed them in their 2 month involvement. Australia and pretty much all of Asia was against Japan, USA just got a couple islands and nuked Japan, China did the real…
- 146.
No republic has lasted longer than three centuries
For
- What was the name of the law, and where can I find it on the internet? A political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them. I merely followed your example of an Asian boy. Surly he must be purely Asian and purely boy,…
- Where did the Romans write that a dictator could only rule in military emergencies for 6 months with absolute power and then step down? Isn't that a power and duty of a government?
Against
- That was written down actually, among countless other laws decreed by the Roman Republic, otherwise, we woul have no knowledge of such now. As for the USA, define a "pure democracy."
- Just because you are more than one thing, doesn't mean you don't count for the other. If you are an Asian boy, would you not be purely Asian? Anyway, all that you stated for a constitution is encompassed within a set of basic laws and rights.
- 147.
Andrew Jackson was a good president
For
- Round 1: Opening Round 2: Rebuttal Round 3: Closing Rules: Cite sources Drops are concessions Andrew Jackson was a great president and leader. For this debate, I define "good president" as one that benefits their citizens. Contention 1: Economy Andrew Jackson helped the…
- First off, I would like to apologize if I come off as "boastful", as the Con claims, for stating a point goes Pro. However, it seems as a typical debate in which you claim points go your way. ConclusionAmerican IndiansThis argument is sufficiently rebutted. The natives were not…
Against
- C.1. Indian removal act This is certainly one of the biggest flaws of Andrew Jackson. In this act Andrew Jackson can be equal to Hitler . My opponent described "good" as beneficial to its own people. However, the Native Americans were not considered citizens up 1924. But,…
- Thanks for the reply ProR.1 American Indians While it is true to some extent that Andrew Jackson was not the sole cause of the conditions of the present day Indians, we can see how he was a major contributor to it. After the tear of trails (which was Jackson's responsibility),…
- 148.
Confederate symbols should be preserved, not removed
For
- I find a deep misunderstanding in your arguments here. First, your claim that "the flag stands for oppression and ignorance...of the fundamental rights of all human beings to freedom..." is inversely the actual case of the intentions of the Confederate government. For instance,…
- I firmly believe in state's rights, therefore, it is solely up to the people of a certain national, regional, or state demographic to make decisions for their respectable nations. The South, being linguistically, culturally, and politically distinct from the rest of America,…
Against
- I acknowledge your views however I believe the flag stands for oppression and ignorance , an ignorance of the fundamental rights of all human beings to freedom , the government that used this flag as it's banner was a government that caused untold suffering because of greed,…
- I accept
- 149.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell was a bad military policy
For
- Alright I am going to go, sentence my sentence on your arguments. "I know it makes me uncomfortable to sleep in a dorm with a gay guy. ." >> I am sorry. I know it does not make me uncomfortable. I realize that this will make some people uncomfortable. However the idea of your…
- Note: I will be using the word "gay" as a catch all for LGBT for the soul purpose that I don't actually distinguish in my own mind or even care. DADT, short for "don't ask don't tell", is a public law put into effect in '93 by the Clinton administration. It was supposed to be…
Against
- you won i guess, you have a good amount of evidence! i may not agree with all of it but i guess youy win!
- The whole don't ask don't tell thing, i think your opinion is right. People who are asked to hide parts of themselves will not perform well. However I don't think that gay men should be able to serve in the armed forces. I know it makes me uncomfortable to sleep in a dorm with…
- 150.
Confederate flags and symbols should be removed from public spaces
For
- I think that the Confederate symbols need to be gone cold turkey. all it is, is just a stupid piece of history waiting to be forgotten. Goodbye Confederate symbols!!!!
Against
- As my opponent neglected to present his case and rebut my arguments, I should win this round; my arguments stand.
- Regardless of my opponent's disregard of this round, I shall post my arguments anyways. Definitions: Confederate: Related to or pertaining to the Confederate States of America, the CSA.Symbols: "something that stands for or suggests something else by reason of relationship,…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?