Discussly

History Debate Topics for Students — page 12

776 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

StudentsDebatePage 12 of 16
  1. 551.

    The atomic bombing of Japan was justified

    For

    • All the civilians were raised to serve their emperor so it would be a childhood thing. For example if someone grew up with a stereotype, they would probably believe it unless there is an outside influence. Many people were raised being taught that the Japanese emperor was a son…
    • The atomic bomb should have been dropped on Japan because it limited the loss of lives. If the war would have continued, many Japanese and American troops would have died. The atomic bomb ensured that fewer American troops would loose their lives and fewer Japanese troops would…

    Against

    • So you say that all the civilians were raised to serve their emperor and that it was a childhood thing...mind giving me some evidence? Is there like a website that you got it from or something? I can't believe that statement unless you have some sort of proof. Also, you say…
    • You mentioned that the atomic bomb should've been dropped on Japan because it limits the loss of lives. And then from there you mention how it stops the war and limits the lost of lives. And you say the bomb ensured that fewer people from both sides would die. That's not…
  2. 552.

    Western museums should repatriate cultural artifacts on request

    For

    • I read well about Fluer's argument. I think even if a country studied a lot about eastern country, it is not better than its own country. For example, in my country, Korea, learn more about Korean history than world history. We just learn little bit about each countries and…
    • I thank Fluer for this debate. Rebuttals: I think western museums should agree to requests to repatriate cultural artefacts First of all, we have more cultural values when we have ours than others. Even if western museums show that they are proud of the diversities within their…

    Against

    • We tend to collaborate with experts (sometimes indigenous to the culture of the artefact) because we want to display the most accurate information. This point also falls due to the fact that these artefacts are historical, usually from over a century ago, and cultures evolve.…
    • Museums are here so we can learn about cultures other than our own and how these cultures have engaged. To send fabulous collections to the country they were made in might seem like a nice thing to do but for reasons of education, source competition and international relations…
  3. 553.

    The Treaty of Versailles was the main cause of World War II

    For

    • Debate's over.Vote for me.
    • Arguments extended.

    Against

    • I accept the definitions Pro has so graciously provided.Right off the bat, I intend to make my position clear with two statements.1. The Treaty of Versaille contributed to WW22. The Treaty of Versaille was not the main cause of WW2Pro has done a brilliant job of showing you how…
    • To make the amount of argumentation even, GOP (Pro) will not rebut in round 5. To GOP: Let me know if you want to change any of the settings/the wording of the res. Accept this when you're ready. :)
  4. 554.

    Napoleon Bonaparte's rule was more harmful than beneficial to Europe

    For

    • My opponent has forfieted again. I stick to my arguments.
    • I stand by my arguments.

    Against

    • Sorry for being away for so long it's just exams and being grounded are two different things, but Napoleon was a great man who one of the biggest empires. If it wasn't for him breaking rules then how would he get an empire. He wouldn't to be a major power you must twist the…
    • I accept this challenge and I'll let my opponent go first! And good luck lets all be fare. How does that sound.
  5. 555.

    The US should return sovereignty over Hawaii to Native Hawaiians

    For

    • Before I begin, I would just like to begin by pointing out that my opponent has insulted me by claiming my sources are "biased", he has also insulted me by claiming the Kingdom of Hawaii is a state and by saying "As for actions of the United States being biased, this only…
    • Reminder: The resolution is "The United States needs to vacate the Kingdom of Hawaii," not "the United States would really like the Hawaii to stay illegally part of this Union" or even "The people of the United States doesn't want the United States to vacate Hawaii" Any points…

    Against

    • "I urge a Pro vote as I feel I had the most arguments and conduct here." Quantity without quality is meaningless, especially when so little of it was relevant to affirming the resolution. Misconduct Pro has been lying about the content of her sources, editing quotes (without…
    • We are agreed on the resolution, and placement of the word needs calling for U.S. action, not Hawaiian action. Yet in spite of this, pro commits the non sequitur fallacy [6] of "Any points not based on the needs of the Kingdom of Hawaii, are irrelevant to this resolution." If…
  6. 556.

    The Communist Manifesto divides people more than it unites them

    For

    • The "Communist Manifesto" written by Marx and Engels is little more than a doctrine explaining why the whole world should engage in war. It spends a lot of time telling people what they should believe history really means and then upon the outcome of Marx's conclusions of all…
    • "LET IT BE NOTED TO THOSE WHO ARE JUDGING BY WHAT THE RESOLUTION SAYS AND NOT WHAT THE PRO SAYS THE RESOLUTION MEANS THAT THE PRO HAS DROPPED MY ATTACKS BASED ON AN APPROPRIATE AND JUSTIFIED INTERPRETATION OF THE RESOLUTION. IF YOU ARE JUDGING BASED OFF OF THAT, THE CON SHOULD…

    Against

    • "I specified those two things in my opening statement and those two ends are my only obligations. You accepted that when you accepted the debate. And, because of my approach, I feel like it would be unfair not to accept, the "Communist Manifesto" does *more* dividing than…
    • Thank you for starting the debate. First, some observations. Since this resolution is "The "Communist Manifesto" serves to divide, not to unite," my opponent must satisfy both parts of this resolution, that the "Communist Manifesto" serves to divide, and that the "Communist…
  7. 557.

    Noah's flood was a historical event

    For

    • We can estimate that the flood referred to in Genies takes place between 10,000 and 5,000 BCE. We also know that agriculture was being invented and it's practices where being adopted all around the world. Post 10,000 BCE was the beginning of the agricultural transition. Why did…
    • Pro will have to show evidence and the possibility of a flood that was out of the ordinary that impacted the people in which the story in Genesis talks about. Con will have to show evidence disproving the possibility of a flood that was out of the ordinary that impacted the…

    Against

    • Remember we are using a literal reading of Genesis and I will attempt to show how a literal reading is impossible. Contention 1: The Flood is Scientifically Impossible C1.1) Tree ring dating Since we are getting a literal reading of the texts, we know for a fact that the fllood…
    • Thank you for challenging me. Noah's flood: An event in the Bible in which God simultaneously covered the entire earth and killing everything but two of every creature and 8 people. Historical event: An event that has actually occurred. Plagiarism=Forfeit Forfeit=Automatic loss…
  8. 558.

    The Exodus described in the Torah did not historically occur

    For

    • You did not keep or follow any of the rules of this debate. This is an automatic forfeit.
    • My opponent successfully broke multiple rules to begin.

    Against

    • Well
    • Well..
  9. 559.

    The bombing of Japan was the right decision

    For

    • you state that the Japaneses were willing to surrender in 1945, But this statement is untrue. The Japaneses were not willing to accept are unconditional surrender at the post dam conference of 1945. this means that they were given time to stop fighting and were warned (and i…
    • the bombing of Japan was unethical but War in general is immoral. As I stated in the first short argument we had two options: 1. Use the new atom bombs or 2. Operation downfall. If we went with the 2nd it most likely would have led to the end of the japans government since they…

    Against

    • I will follow up my previous argument and the one my opponent has made in the best way possible. First - the holocaust is completely, and I mean completely, 100% unrelated to this debate topic. Was the Holocaust worse than the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Definitely. But…
    • My opponent continues to present a self-confused, contradictory argument that I shall easily dismantle. I will first start off by using a quote from a source that is quite literally impossible for my opponent to refute. Former United States president, Herbert Hoover. ". . . the…
  10. 560.

    Jinnah was a greater leader than Gandhi

    For

    • Jinnah was the Ambassador for hindu muslim unity.But when he see that Muslims were ignored by congress(Gandhi) he started to fight for Muslim but non vilontly.He always said muslims to be peaceful.That is why he never went to jail.Gandhi on the other hand talking of peace on…
    • just because he played in the hands of British it doesnot make him a big leader.Look what he did to Muslims and minorities when he won election in 1937.He had a strange cunning policy of Talking of peace and doing Harm to muslims.He forced muslims to Migrate to Afghanistan just…

    Against

    • My opponent has only re-illustrated old points and has not given convincing examples of why Jinnah was a greater leader than Gandhi. See my points above about why Gandhi was a greater leader than Jinnah. Thus, my prior points will extend forward.
    • Gandhi did not provoke Hindus and Muslims to protest, he spoke of peace and they misinterpreted it. Gandhi was a greater leader than Jinnah because Gandhi's philosophy of peace, freedom, and civil liberties has expanded around the world and has influenced mass amounts of…
  11. 561.

    Richard Nixon was a better president than John F. Kennedy

    For

    • Counter-Rebuttals and ConclusionI vigorously restate that Kennedy was a failure in foreign policy. He got the U.S. involved in Vietnam, which was a mess that Nixon got the country out of. The Bay of Pigs invasion was indeed, as my opponent said, a plan set forth by the previous…
    • The accomplishments of Kennedy have a bit more to them than what my opponent has mentioned. Here are my rebuttals to some of them."[Kennedy] passed executive orders that banned discrimination based on race."This sounds good, but in the area of civil rights as a whole, he was…

    Against

    • As the opponent did not disagree with the Rebuttals: First, I would like to challenge the validity of his sources used. My main point of contention is "http://www.theamericanconservative.com...;. This website, in addition to being clearly biased by its title, was written by…
    • First, I do not believe that one's success as president can be measured by his accomplishments in office alone. I will not deny that Nixon had the accomplishments in office he did (though I do intend to offer a rebuttal of them of the next round). However, Nixon also destroyed…
  12. 562.

    George W. Bush was the worst US president of the last 75 years

    For

    • George Bush has dramaticly damaged this country internally and externally. The gap between rich and poor has widened, "The top 10 percent, roughly those earning more than $100,000, also reached a level of income share not seen since before the Depression." and "the top 1…

    Against

    • Your arguments are one-sided and, ultimately, incorrect. When dealing with economic issues, the only body that can be blamed is Congress. The President can only influence Congress. And the economic situation is one of the littlest parts of Bush's administration when looking at…
    • I just want to once again state that I hope whoever votes on this, votes because they saw that I actually tried to put effort into this debate, unlike my opponent, and vote accordingly. Thank you
  13. 563.

    Calvin Coolidge was a better president than Woodrow Wilson

    For

    • Win
    • Win

    Against

    • I would like to express my sincirest apologies to History Genius for forfieting to rounds of his debate. My internet aint great and i dont have much time on my hands. If he wishes to redo this debate, i am more then happy. As for my arguments for why Wilson was better Ill start…
    • I agree with you that Coolidge was far better. For the sake of debate though I challange you. Its hard for you though because Wilson deed a lot of important thing internationally and nationally. Coolidge restored the economy by not doing that much other then deregulation and…
  14. 564.

    The partition of India and Pakistan was inevitable

    For

    • I have recently joined Debate. org so I might not have all those points and statistics but I assure you I have read history very well. This debate will be on the topic whether or not Partition of India and Pakistan was inevitable or not. I highly support this topic and will…
    • But, the facts he proposed as the basis of his opinion were rotten from the roots and perhaps actually gave evidence instead for my opinion. To my opponent's point that there were actually communal violence between the Hindus and Muslims for a long time, it wasn't a new thing,…

    Against

    • Before summarizing and underlinining my arguments, I'd like to make one thing clear- the debate is not about whether or not India and Pakistan *should* have partitioned. Its about whether the partition was unavoidable. So his first point, for example, stating that if Sikh riots…
    • First, I apologize for unintentionally hurting any sentiments (if I did), I can assure you I didn't mean to be rude. I was merely pointing out that Muhammad Ali Jinnah was about to die of tuberculosis, and had Mountbatten known that, he would have postponed the Indian…
  15. 565.

    George Patton was a greater general than Bernard Montgomery

    For

    • I will begin by addressing my Point number 3, and also my opponent's counter. We intentionally created this debate with the word "better" so that we could analyze as many aspects of the general as possible. My opponent has a valid assertion in that the general's life at home…
    • Patton was contemptible with his soldiers and fellow generals, and caused strife among Allied High Command. " Patton was known for this, but yet he still got things done. He saw great success in Operation torch in North Africa, and sweaped across Europe after Normandy. "Patton…

    Against

    • The secrets that he leaked obviously didn't affect the U.S. or the Allies severely enough for us to lose the war. The British are probably as guilty as the U.S. in leaking secrets, so do not act like Patton and the U.S. military where the only ones at fault." The bullhorn…
    • Thanks for posting, Opinionator! A splendid argument. I will begin by addressing my Point number 3, and also my opponent's counter. We intentionally created this debate with the word "better" so that we could analyze as many aspects of the general as possible. My opponent has a…
  16. 566.

    The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified

    For

    • My opponent has had all of her points refuted, and has failed to refute my two points concerning utilitarianism and an international show of force. Vote Pro. AFFIRMED.
    • First of all, you don't want to say "Affirmed" at the end of your argument. Affirmed means you side PRO. You would want to say Negated or something to that effect... 1) On the Surrender of the Japanese. My opponent seems to ignore history. Regardless of the state of the…

    Against

    • (I'm new to this by the way, and I'm sure I will pick up how you set out your arguments, but for now, I'm going to try and do it as simply but effectively as possible.) 1. My opponent makes the contention that Japan were not about to surrender. 2. My opponent also makes the…
    • I think it was totally unecassary to drop the atom bomb on Japan as they were about to surrender anyway and it killed so many people, I also believe that America didn't have full knowledge of the atom bomb, so it was a case of 'I've found something that we can throw at them.'…
  17. 567.

    Confederate flags should be removed from public spaces

    For

    • it could be a racist flag if it is intended to symbolize a racist nation, especially when the reason was racism for the nation to even exist at all. the designer of the flag thought it was an emblem of a superior race. and the only reason the flag was created, was because the…
    • here is what Thompson, the designer of the confederate flag thought: "As a people we are fighting to maintain the Heaven-ordained supremacy of thee white man over the inferior or colored race... As a national emblem, it is significant of our higher cause, the cause of a…

    Against

    • Many people in the Confederate states were not racist. Some people just wanted to keep slavery because they had grown so accustomed to it, and they thought they wouldn't be able to manage under another method. Pro says that the only reason the Confederate flag was created was…
    • Just because the creator was racist, does not mean the flag is. The flag was created to be the new flag of the new country, The Confederate States Of America. How can a flag made to simply represent a country be racist?
  18. 568.

    Viking heritage should not be celebrated

    For

    • OK, here's the thing. The Vikings were merciless without compassion. There are things about them that make them worse than the Normans, Nazis or Romans. The pattern in which English colonists pretty much stole most of North America was similar to that of the Vikings. You can…
    • OK, first of all Vikings were not a race but an empire that composed of what is now modern day Denmark, Sweden, and maybe Norway to an extent. Their atrocities against the indigenous Britons for instance is documented. (http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk...). According to that…

    Against

    • Historical groups of people should not be politicized at all. To celebrate them or intentionally not celebrate them is over simplifying an entire culture.
  19. 569.

    The Salem witch trials were a true parallel to McCarthyism

    For

    • Before I begin my speech, I would like to emphasise that our definition of the 'Salem witch trials' are from reference to that of the book "The Crucible by Arthur Miller". However, fear not, the events from the book do not deviate from the real version of the events very much.…
    • It is. Even Sparknotes says so. HA! And I've been around longer than you. As you youth would say, "loser"!

    Against

    • Unlike Senator Mccarthy, you do not seem to have been silenced by a vote of censure or anything parallel to it, but by your own volition or laziness. This is a sign that one has abandoned one's position for lack of evidence. You were online a day ago, so we know that you aren't…
    • " The proposition is not so much dependent on whether or not witches and communism were metaphysical or not, but rather, the true analogy lies in the willingness and the ease in which the judges and the public were willing to believe that there were." Willingness to believe a…
  20. 570.

    Australia Day should be changed

    For

    • January 26th, the day that marks the arrival of the first fleet in 1788 is intended to bring the population of Australia together as one. Although, it has been recognised that instead of bringing both Aboriginals and non-aboriginals together it is creating more of a division.…
    • Although my opponent has mentioned that Australia Day should be a time to celebrate being a multicultural country, Aboriginals should be celebrated as they were the first people here. As I have mentioned before Australia day is a mourning day for aboriginals. With it bring a…

    Against

    • Although, many people think of Australia Day as a day of when awful things happened, January 26th doesn"t just mean the day when the first fleet invaded Australia, but when a new culture was brought in. This is one reason why we celebrate Australia, to commemorate our…
    • It"s tough when devastating things has happened to the Indigenous heritage. As I have mentioned, many Australian"s are sorry for that devastating era, but let us all co-operate by actually celebrating for the multicultural country we are today. When the first fleet arrived from…
  21. 571.

    England should not have colonized North America

    For

    • Now to look at the colonization of North America from a different viewpoint, the viewpoint of the Native Americans. I will be arguing that England should not have colonized North America because they had no right to do so and, in hind sight, led to the death of millions of…
    • I accept this debate and will be arguing that England, and later The United States, did not have the right to colonize the land (The Americas). I also agree to use definitions from dictionary.com and the Rules/Format provided by Con.

    Against

    • For my final round, I will conclude that England made a good decision while colonizing America. They brought great new opportunities to many.
    • I understand Pro's reasoning behind forfeiting, however, I will still comply with my rules and extend the debate. "Forfeiture allowed, but must be followed by an extension." -Con, round 1 Thank you for the good debate so far.
  22. 572.

    History will judge the 2000s harshly

    For

    • Here ends our debate.
    • This debate will end sooner if I reply

    Against

    • Before we begin, I would like to pose a clarifying question. Will this debate focus on American history in the 21st century, or on a more international level (as per your excellent examples)? Until hearing back from you, I will assume that we are concentrating on the United…
  23. 573.

    The investigation into flight MH370 should be halted

    For

    • Yes all ur info is correct but 10 airplanes were sent today to the destination were over 300 objects were found in the satellite of Thailand
    • It should be stopped for it is not going to improve the current situation between the people and the airline

    Against

    • 1. Opening:Thanks Pro for offering this brief debate on an entralling event currently in transgression.It is with my greatest sympathy of the families of those currently involved, and currently anxiously awaiting news regarding the events on board MX370, and the (now…
    • Thanks pro,And we with the refined sattelite data, we now have several potential leads thanks tot he new search area:. http://www.bbc.co.uk...Several Chinese families refuse to accept the demise of their loved ones, in spite of the current evidence. Therefore it's even more…
  24. 574.

    Knights were the best warriors before gunpowder

    For

    • and thank you for this was an amazing debate I hope to find other warriors to match the Knight I hope to meet you in a different debate best wishes max (its like a letter)
    • A Viking's axe is designed to sustain mid range fighting meaning that if the Viking's Axe gets stuck, the Viking can quickly let go of the weapon fast enough to shield himself from a strike. The Viking is also equipped with other weapons such as a fighting hammer which would…

    Against

    • Since this is the last round, i cannot continue to argue. I thank my opponent for a fun debate and hope to debate him soon. I urge the voters to vote for me because i presented all my topics as well as countered my opponents points. It was a great debate and i wish my opponent…
    • "to the Viking hammer the knight brings the morning star (mace version) witch has spikes. the Viking only has mail as an armor and although he can really dish it out he cant take it ( the knight can do a fairly good job in doing both." The Vikings life style alone is enough to…
  25. 575.

    The Confederate flag should be removed from public places

    For

    • For my final debate I would like to start off by thanking my opponent for using his time to debate and also for stating a clean and appropriate debate.. So we have both stated our main points and now I have a few things to address that were previously stated in my opponents…
    • Hello, let me start my debate by recognizing what the confederate flag is, the Confederate flag was used during the civil war to represent the 13 Confederate states. Now for the sake of debate lets analyze what the civil war was, although most people already know what it was.…

    Against

    • I also want to say that because Pro wants to save the rebuttals for round 3, I refrained from reading her opening arguments in case I subconsciously tried to rebut it, but if I end up rebutting some of it in the following text just know that I will reiterate my rebuttals in the…
    • I accept. As Con, I will be arguing to continue flying the confederate flag in public venues in America.
  26. 576.

    American independence was net harmful overall

    For

    • ConclusionIf the U. S. had not gained inependence and had stayed a dominion much like Canada, the world and the U. S. would have benefited greatly, because there would have been much less imperialism in the world, as well as much better domestic social policy on the North…
    • Clarification:This debate is not about the U.S. joining the commonwealth, nor is it about the likelihood of the American Revolution failing.The purpose of this debate is to assume that the U.S. never achieved independence, and then to compare the outcomes.II. U.S society-…

    Against

    • This debate is not about the U.S. joining the commonwealth, nor is it about the likelihood of the American Revolution failing.^For the purpose of this debate, I am assuming that the USA becomes a constitutional monarchy, with a liberal democracy and the English monarch as head…
    • My computer cradshed and I lost my argument. I am also out of time. So I guess this is a forfeit for this round.
  27. 577.

    It is hypocritical to praise Lincoln's violence against rebels but not Washington's

    For

    • As for your for allegations regarding the causes of war let me utterly refute you. Neither rebellion, American or Confederate, was based solely on one purpose. Although taxation without representation (taxation in itself was not perceived as unjust by the vast majority of…
    • Let us look at this logically, Both President Abraham Lincoln and King George III are known well in history books, but under different lights. Since most of their legacy rests on American shores, the popular history written about them as an American bias. This is the only…

    Against

    • "As for your for allegations regarding the causes of war let me utterly refute you. Neither rebellion, American or Confederate, was based solely on one purpose." I have no allegations concerning the causes of the war. Only concerning the consequences of war. "Although taxation…
    • " On the negative side both leaders spat into the face of democracy by refusing to allow separatist regions to go about their crafted polices (i.e. separate)." Democracy is not a good thing as such. Whether ignoring the will of the majority of a region is good or bad depends on…
  28. 578.

    Betsy Ross designed the American flag

    For

    • But George Washington approached Betsy Ross and asked to make the flag. She changed the six pointed stars and put 5 pointed stars. Ross put 13 stars for the 13 colonies.
    • According to the traditional account, the original flag was made in June 1776, when a small committee"including George Washington, Robert Morris and relative George Ross"visited Betsy and discussed the need for a new American flag. Betsy accepted the job to manufacture the…

    Against

    • Pro forfeited the 3rd round, so there no rebuttals to defend against.
    • Lack of Historical Evidence There is no historical evidence for the Betsy Ross Story. The Betsy Ross's Grandson, William Canby, fabricated the story in 1870. The Betsy Ross story was a post-civil war myth, fabricated by William Canby. The entire Betsy Ross story is based on 3rd…
  29. 579.

    Russia's entry into World War I was the main cause of tsarist collapse

    For

    • any takers?
    • My question is identifying the "MOST IMPORTANT CAUSE" I am not saying the others did not have an impact on the downfall however the tsar would never have abdicated if the army had of stayed loyal; but they did not. After bloody Sunday the tsar made certain reforms that actually…

    Against

    • When Russia entered WWI, there were many existing problems that had begun to contribute to the end of the czarist age. There was great oppression of the people because Russia prior to WWI was a very autocratic government where the religion was part of the government, and…
    • Resolution States "Most important CAUSE of downfall of Imperial Russia. .. .. " The Pro is saying how before the War the Tzar was loved, but I have offered much evidence against that belief. The Pro has not offered a counter argument to why decades and decades of the…
  30. 580.

    Spain was the most destructive colonial power

    For

    • 1. The British only taxed them heavily after war. The British only created the Townshend Acts and the Stamp Act cause they lost money on war and 10 years isn't that long. 2. The British was a great supporter of abolishing slavery. The British even paid Portugal "750,000 to…
    • Statement 1. Wikipedia and ask.com can be trustworthy if you double check the information which I did. Statement 2. Did you even watch the Youtube video I said to watch? The reason the British were taxing them highly is because they needed money for the war. Statement 3. Yes, I…

    Against

    • Section 1: Either way, they were still heavily taxed. The Spanish did no such thing. Section 2: The British didn't support abolishing slavery until the early 1800's. It was officially abolished in 1833. This was a good while after the colonial era. The Spanish abolished slavery…
    • Section 1: There wasn't always a war. The British were taxing their people heavily before and after the war. The French and Indian war lasted from 1754-1765. The British Colonies were around long before that. They started colonizing in 1607. The American Revolution started 10…
  31. 581.

    John F. Kennedy's assassination was a conspiracy

    For

    • Thank you for agreeing to the debate! I'll dive right in! I would like to start this debate off by saying that I was previously of the opinion that President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald as an act to gain attention towards himself, because that…
    • This debate will be one that questions the official story that JFK was assasinated by Lee Harvey Oswald. It will be set up in the following manner: 1. Introduction (no arguments). 2. Arguments 3. Rebuttal 4. Conclusions

    Against

    • Pro challenged me to this debate than never responded or gave any other arguments....
    • I extend my arguments....
  32. 582.

    The Mongols would have conquered Europe

    For

    • Rebuttal". .. smoking walls were all that remained of the splendour that once was Kiev[the smoke came from] bright domes [which] became a prey to the flames"That does not prove anything. For all we know, the walls could have been on the verge of collapse when the gate fell, and…
    • My opponent has presented his case, which, while intriguing, contains serious flaws. I will go into detail later.Rebuttal"Several other sources, however, drawing on Dmytro's account, do make reference to the fact that the walls, while smoking and battered, were still standing…

    Against

    • SourcesWhile my opponent may have used more sources in this debate, I have done more with fewer sources. Indeed, all my material already had the backing of a source by last round, with two exceptions (although admittadly I did make use of my opponent's sources). My opponent, by…
    • "I could not find the mention of the siege of Kiev. Could point it out to me? ". .. smoking walls were all that remained of the splendour that once was Kiev[the smoke came from] bright domes [which] became a prey to the flamesThe average city was not anywhere near as fortified…
  33. 583.

    Dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified

    For

    • Atomic demonstration over Japan would have wasted one of two bombs
    • Idea of US war crimes in bombing Japan is unacceptable

    Against

    • 2005 US Strategic Bombing Survey said bombing Japan unnecessary
    • Hundreds of thousands of people died, it did not improve life for them
  34. 584.

    World War II would not have happened without the Treaty of Versailles

    For

    • To answer my opponent's question about where I'm going with this, I'm saying that the demands of the treaty of Versailles were unfair to Germany. If you look back to what started the war you'll see that Germany did nothing except aid an ally. What really started the war was the…
    • If the Treaty of Versailles hadn't made Germany suffer consequences for WWI, WWII wouldn't have been started by the Germans. My points are, Germany couldn't have a military, they had to pay reparations, and they couldn't be united with Austria

    Against

    • But the treaty could also simply have taught Germany a lesson about having a standing military. When Germany kept a standing military, they were able to come to the aid of their ally - which lead to escalation. Germany had the opportunity to realize the dangers of a standing…
    • First off: formalities.Greetings debaters and voters - this is my first debate on this site. I do parliamentary debate in college, and I am terrible at it. Out of respect for your time, I will keep my argumentation short and hopefully sweet. I have no formal opinion on this…
  35. 585.

    The Scottish Lowlands should apologize for the Highland Clearances

    For

    • Thank you, but there is a lot of problems with the statement that "England didn't care for Scotland." That is a major error. If an part of England hated any part of Scotland, it was the north and the Midlands.Thank you, your arguments a good as well.Aye, in this case it was…
    • I myself a highlander, unfortunately must defend the horrific acts done against us. Yet in a way they we necessary, these new breeds of sheep were making the highland lord (now land lords) very wealthy and these lord were evicting people for the sake of profit. Some of these…

    Against

    • Thank you, your arguments a good as well. Now, modernity is a very subjective term, bro. Is everything that's modern necessarily good? Aye, in this case it was sure the people were not treated as they should but you have to look at the big picture. As I said before If the…
    • I myself a highlander, unfortunately must defend the horrific acts done against us. Yet in a way they we necessary, these new breeds of sheep were making the highland lord (now land lords) very wealthy and these lord were evicting people for the sake of profit. Some of these…
  36. 586.

    Nationalism was beneficial to Europeans in the 19th and 20th centuries

    For

    • For readers purposes and so our definition is clear, I posted the definition. na�tion�al�ism /ˈn�ʃənlˌɪzəm, ˈn�ʃnəˌlɪz-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[nash-uh-nl-iz-uhm, nash-nuh-liz-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. national…

    Against

    • My opponent is yet to respond, so I shall give him (I am assuming) the last word in this debate. Good debate!
    • From dictionary.com nation - a large number of people who share the same history, ancestors, culture etc (whether or not they all live in the same country) This is the historic meaning of a "nation" which I am using for the purpose of this debate. I will first address your…
  37. 587.

    The United States should return sovereignty to the Kingdom of Hawaii

    For

    • "It is very relevant. The monarchy ruled without the full consent of the governed and makes this government just as illegitimate as the later governments"You have provided no evidence of this. It was the Queen LiliE9;uokalani wrote the draft 1893 constitution. "In 1891,…
    • ***I am extending my previous arguments.***"My opponent presents an interesting case however the Kingdom of Hawaii itself was formed by the otherthrow of the smaller kingdoms of Oahu, Maui, Molokai, Lanai and began as a dictatorship. The kingdom became a monarchy thanks to the…

    Against

    • Claim: You have provided no evidence of this [monarchy ruled without the full consent of the governed and makes this government just as illegitimate as the later governments] I regard all forms of government that does not derive itself from the consent of the governed as…
    • Claim: Foundation of Kingdom of Hawaii is irrelevant. It is very relevant. The monarchy ruled without the full consent of the governed and makes this government just as illegitimate as the later governments. Claim: Annexation is illegal Just because something was against the…
  38. 588.

    George W. Bush damaged America's global reputation

    For

    • First of all, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. And I really hope we can get back on topic. Iraq was not out for America until we attacked it. Please, back to the reputation. Bush has ruined our relations in the middle east because of the instability in Iraq. The only nation…
    • Now you say that that the terrorists are going to do what their going to do. You ignore the fact that their numbers have increased because of Bush, thus their power, thus their power to commit horrible atrocities. Now I'm not saying Bush caused 9/11, but he has made it much…

    Against

    • He didnt cause any of this to happen! Its really not his fault. He attacked Iraq becuase they would have attacked us. Im glad he decided to do that because it truth it's better for all of us.
    • That is not nessicarily true. Some people think it is, but my opinion is that it wouldnt matter if he was president or not. It wouldnt stop the terrorist anyway. If their going to do it, their going to do it. It's not like Bush saud "Hey, bomb this here state." now did he? Im…
  39. 589.

    History cannot explain how the Pyramid of Giza was built

    For

    • 1. For some reason, you quote me as saying "the people who lived 4,500 years ago were primitive, bronze age ignorants" when in fact that is not my position. When I wrote that, I was merely pointing out the position of mainstream history, in order to argue against it.2. I do not…
    • In mainstream history, the people who lived 4,500 years ago were primitive, bronze age ignorants - with less knowledge than the people living in some god forsaken village that you can come across if you travel across the seven mountains. Naturally, such people would only know…

    Against

    • Not necessarily, all i am saying is that slaves were forced to construct pyramids under strict orders. That is what happened, your arguments are jargon and beat around the bush, but im just highlighting fact, straight to the point.
    • Intelligence level aside, people can follow orders. Schools taught us that Pharaohs forced slaves to build pyramids for them, under a hierarchy system. So say you have 100 slaves on the infrastructure site, each slave has to built w/ 100 bricks a day or he dies, by the end of…
  40. 590.

    George W. Bush was a good president

    For

    • all of what you just said in the previous debate was a downright lie and you know it you accuse me of having no surces well neither did you the bush presdiency was one of great many things look i will do it again 1. he kept america safe 2. he passed a good prescription drug…
    • look i Challenge the con person for the last debate to debate me again!

    Against

    • sure...I'll debate this...fire the first shots!
    • wonderful...
  41. 591.

    A nation can only be a superpower once

    For

    • I will debate this topic with you and post my arguments in the next round.
    • Conclusion: There are no "superpowers", the world is dominated by its current "stage". Individual power can only be achieved through mutual advantages. Because they world develops as a whole, no independent state is able to claim complete superiority over another.

    Against

    • I think that you can be a super power more than once. first acceptance second/third debate fourth congratulations
    • A super power is a nation that influences another nation or nations and they want to be like them. Good debate.
  42. 592.

    The atomic bombings of Japan were unjustifiable

    For

    • US is exhibiting levels of impenetrable stubbornness: 1. No due process of law for Guantanamo Bay Prisoners 2. US Spying Program, NSA 3. US President signing a law against accepting a Visa to the UN 3. Ignoring the U.S. Constitution 4. The President unconstitutionally declaring…
    • If the bombs on Japan was justifiable, then its justified to bomb any nation who is a warmonger, because to you, its common law to bomb and sacrifice its inhabitants because they were dead any ways due to their indoctrination at a young age to sacrifice themselves to their…

    Against

    • Even though my opponent has taken this debate off subject, I will do my best to reply. First of all, e are causing no harm to another first world super power or it's allies. While the people are stubborn, the official rules in place are not stubborn. No one in the right kind…
    • If the United States had a level of impenetrable stubbornness, that is, not willing to open up to other ideas, and was causing harm to others in the world (Japan on our then ally China), then I would have to unhappily agree with bombing. I don't want to change the goal posts,…
  43. 593.

    Richard Nixon was a good president

    For

    • Nixon was just accused of doing all those things, and pardoned by Gerald Ford. Are we sure that he was a crook? Most of us are. But that doesn't mean he was. Secondly, Mr. Nixon was very persistent in politics and had high hopes. He waited for eight years, anxious to be…
    • We've given Bill Clinton "despites". We've given Hoover, Johnson, Buchanan, Athur, Taft, Wilson "despites", and on many occasions with others we've given Nixon many a "despite." So why does that matter? Every man has his faults. yes, Watergate was big, but he knew he did wrong…

    Against

    • As my opponent has forfeited and failed to address my points, I believe I have won this debate.
    • "Nixon was just accused of doing all those things, and pardoned by Gerald Ford. Are we sure that he was a crook? Most of us are. But that doesn't mean he was." It was very, very obvious that he was guilty. All the proof pointed to this. He was pardoned simply to avoid the…
  44. 594.

    Margaret Thatcher was a great prime minister

    For

    • Before I begin, I'd like to remind my opponent that this debate is not about whether or not Margaret Thatcher was a "good" person, but whether or not she was a "great" person. Therefore this debate will not be focusing on her political ideals but her as a person. I'd also like…
    • This is a debate for whether or not Margaret Thatcher, British Prime Minister from 1979-1990, was a great person. Some quick definitions: GREAT: Inspiring; famous BUT not necessarily popular or "good" I'll just point that out again; this is not a debate about whether she was…

    Against

    • Once upon a time British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was called a``Iron Lady``. As Pro points out, ``she was indeed a great person. `` It is true that she challenged for introducing a drastic policy to strengthen the competitiveness of her country. However,…
    • Let me present my conclusion. Conclusion : A great person like Churchill and Thatcher influenced greatly on the course and destiny of their nation. Their action and decision-making brought about benefits and unreasonable effects on the society and the life of people. However, I…
  45. 595.

    Remembrance Day should focus less on honouring veterans

    For

    • Rebuttal:"So you don't think any cause is noble to fight for, well then lets take a historical look at all the causes that you must agree weren't worth fighting for, and the consequences that arise. It'll be fun on the bun!" I would like to clarify my point on this. It is not…
    • Thank you for your points, Con. To respond:"Does pro think we shouldn't thank Veterans? I think its perfectly fine to thank a veteran for risking their life, leaving their home and family behind, to fight and some times die, for a noble cause. I'd say someone who has endured…

    Against

    • Rebuttals"I would like to clarify my point on this. It is not that I believe no cause is worth fighting for. I think that no cause is worth fighting and killing for. There is a difference. There are many ways to fight for a cause that don't involve killing. " I'm glad pro…
    • "I disagree. I don't believe that any cause is noble to fight and kill for. I am sure that veterans believed that they were doing the right thing at the time when they accepted the call to fight, but I still believe that the actions they took were wrong, and for that reason it…
  46. 596.

    The Soviet Union mattered more than the Western Allies in defeating Germany

    For

    • I agree, I did make several mistakes in me earlier writing. I probably was just not thinking enough. However you also made several errors in your history and in your thinking. -One of the reasons Hitler invaded Russia because he believed that the British hoped that Russia would…
    • Operation Barbarossa was the largest invasion in history. It consisted of over 4 million German, Romanian, Hungarian, Italian, and Finnish soldiers. Hitler believed that with the defeat of the Soviet Union, Britain would become demoralized and surrender. As the Germany advanced…

    Against

    • Very good opening arguments. However, Pro makes some historical mistakes. PART ONE Pro's Historical mistakes 1) Hitler invaded Russia in hopes to demoralize the British Isles. This is a point that is simply not true. The Battle of Britain was the battle meant to demoralize the…
    • But seriously, I love world war two and this will be fun.
  47. 597.

    Martin Luther King Jr. had a positive impact on the nation

    For

    • First I will offer some direct rebuttals. Prior to this, everything that my adversary posted in the first round, he has admitting to using snopes as a source. This is not credible nor acceptable.Hypothetically if he wanted to have sex with hookers or multiple women, it is a non…
    • I will however continue and provide my own case as stated in the debate outlines. So as stated in the outline of this debate, we are going to examine if Martin Luther King JR, had a positive impact on this country. Did he offer progression. I will now offer some contentions to…

    Against

    • I am not saying that I would discriminate based on race if I were to hire an employee. That is not what this debate is about. I believe that the policies that Mr. King shoved down the throats of many Americans did nothing to promote racial harmony. Federal bureaucrats and…
    • Since this debate is about Micheal Kings inpact on America, I will focus my argument on that. I believe the rules and regulations that Micheal King advocated for (mainly the Civil Rights Act of 1964) are not only unconstitutional, but a threat to our personal liberty. The…
  48. 598.

    Eurocentric distortions of African antiquity still matter today

    For

    • I have to point out that white people had to come from somewhere and also have a history. The fact is that I don't particularly care about that either. The history of the Hawaiian people, from accomplishing a sailing and navigating feat unequaled even by the British Navy, to…
    • OK I have to go through my rant. See http://wiki.idebate.org... The way a debate works is first one side takes a position and defends it; then the opposition takes a stand disagreeing with them and they take turns admiring their own stand and trashing the other guy's. I am…

    Against

    • Quoting from "LD Debate Terms", only shows you can't defend why you are FOR Euro-centric Distortions of African Antiquity. ......?? African people were the first to inhabit the earth, Gloger's rule was given as an explanation why Blacks were first, archeological finds have…
    • I appreciate my opponents ability in attempting to construct the world's biggest straw man; however the revision of those histories, "Zionist" and that of the "Palestinian", are completely off target. Genocide vs. racism sounds like an appealing argument but it completely…
  49. 599.

    The atomic bomb has been beneficial to society overall

    For

    • Hello, Today I would like to debate the topic of nuclear weapons and their role in todays soceity. I will be taking the side of pro, supporting the statement that nuclear weapons have had a helpful role in our society. Round one - AcceptenceRound two - Opening statementsRound…
    • Also, for readers who don't want to read the full post, a closing summary is at the end. --Operation Downfall--Operation Downfall was one of the largest planned landing invasions of WWII, a pacific D-Day, what most people dont understand is the amout of lives the atomic bombs…

    Against

    • I accept. Good luck!
    • Extend.
  50. 600.

    Ancient Rome contributed little original innovation

    For

    • Acceptance only.

    Against

    • Everyone loves socks after all. SOCKS.
    • (Rome invented socks and roads)

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.