Discussly

History Debate Topics

914 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 1 of 19
  1. 1.

    Agriculture was humanity's biggest mistake

    For

    • Sorry for taking so long to post my last round, I've been trying to find a quote to use for part of my argument, but unfortunately I couldn't find it. Again, my opponent fails to see that not all hunter and gathers where the same. It is true that many clans of hunter and…
    • I am not underestimating the power of technology, I understand that hunter and gathers of 10,000 where not capable of launching satellites. The question isn't what technology they had, but what technology they needed. Why did we start launching satellites? The first satellite…

    Against

    • My opponet claims that not all hunter gatherers was nomatic, but the fact still remains, the vast majority was nomatic, and we are talking about humanity, not a select population. The reason for humanity spreading across the globe was because of the vast majority of humanity…
    • I said "overestimating", that aside my opponent makes the claim that constant moving helps develop technology, through association, but fails to recognize my underling point, that archeologists found that Hunter gatherers never stayed in a place for more than two weeks, thus…
  2. 2.

    Knights were the best warriors before gunpowder

    For

    • and thank you for this was an amazing debate I hope to find other warriors to match the Knight I hope to meet you in a different debate best wishes max (its like a letter)
    • A Viking's axe is designed to sustain mid range fighting meaning that if the Viking's Axe gets stuck, the Viking can quickly let go of the weapon fast enough to shield himself from a strike. The Viking is also equipped with other weapons such as a fighting hammer which would…

    Against

    • Since this is the last round, i cannot continue to argue. I thank my opponent for a fun debate and hope to debate him soon. I urge the voters to vote for me because i presented all my topics as well as countered my opponents points. It was a great debate and i wish my opponent…
    • "to the Viking hammer the knight brings the morning star (mace version) witch has spikes. the Viking only has mail as an armor and although he can really dish it out he cant take it ( the knight can do a fairly good job in doing both." The Vikings life style alone is enough to…
  3. 3.

    Imperialism and empire-building are always harmful

    For

    • Defining Imperialism and Empire-building We need to separate modern imperialism from ancient empire-building because scholars traditionally define the first as an economic relationship where indigenous populations still have a stake in local governance and the second as a…
    • I will start off like this: can you ever name an instance in which empire-building was ever good? The Native Americans, for instance, are not happy with the fact that one country -- Scotland -- took away their land and looted from them. Are the Inuits happy about Denmark being…

    Against

    • Defining Imperialism and Empire-building We need to separate modern imperialism from ancient empire-building because scholars traditionally define the first as an economic relationship where indigenous populations still have a stake in local governance and the second as a…
    • I accept. Please post your argument.
  4. 4.

    Che Guevara is the most influential person of the 20th century

    For

    • there is an arguement for gandhi but i most certainly think there are faults with your choices. 1.while gandhi did stage a peaceful revoulution it was no way as succesful as cubas.he did succed in removing the british from india,but the aftermath of india winning its…
    • Che Guevara is the most influential person of the 20th century. for a start everything this man did was for other peoples best interests. he was born in to a wealthy family who were never a witness to poverty. so for a young man like this,attemting to remove povery from latin…

    Against

    • "while einstein was probably the most intelligent man of all time he has not really influenced people who have not got involved in the occupation of science."This simply isn't true. Einstein influenced the very foundation upon scientific education in schools. E=MC^2 could be…
    • My goal in this debate shall only be to show that there were others in the 20th century that may be considered more influential than that of Che Guevera. According to Time Magazine's "Most Important People of the Century" list, Che Guevera was not the most influential. In fact,…
  5. 5.

    Henry VIII was a good king of England

    For

    • As I anticipated, my opponent has not taken this debate seriously and therefore has put in a minimal effort in defending his case. Either way, the comparison between Hitler and Henry VIII is completely irrational, as Henry VIII did not commit a genocide. I comprehend your point…
    • Round 2: ArgumentI will be arguing that Henry VIII was overall a good king for England. There is lots of controversy surrounding around Henry VIII, and it primarily originates from his six wives and infamous beheading of two of them. I will attempt to show that despite these…

    Against

    • Was Hitler a good king also? If your were a German nationalist in 1940, he was the best.
    • I accept. There has never been a good King, only followers that submit to the Kings powers, for their own benefit.
  6. 6.

    Columbus Day should remain a federal holiday in the United States

    For

    • As per the debate format, I will expand on my four points for why Columbus Day should be recognized. 1) The discovery of the new continent brought about a huge economic boost for European nations, as well as introducing new agriculture. The Columbian Exchange is the term used…
    • I am glad I got to debate this with someone; I have always been intrigued by this topic. Thank you, my opponent, for the opportunity. I will be arguing that Columbus Day should remain a federal holiday in the United States. Christopher Columbus' voyage was monumental in the…

    Against

    • Because you forfeited the previous round, I will not continue my argument from the previous round. It would be unfair for me to get an extra round. I request that in the fourth round you provide a rebuttal to my points from the first two rounds.
    • I will begin my rebuttal on each of your four points. 1. I assume that for your first point you suggest that Columbus' discovery was a positive thing for the world because of all of the effects of the Columbian Exchange. The Columbian Exchange, however, did much more than…
  7. 7.

    John Hanson was the real first president

    For

    • Well that was before the country was even independent, and that was NOT the argument, but it could be one, Huntington did no real work, and so was not president, just filled a seat, and you were close to refuting my argument, and at the time there was no constitution, so no…
    • Ok, if Maryland had ratified it of their own initiative, it still cannot downsize his accomplishment, nor can the author not being him, and as the office was called President, he was president, and fyi, i have the argument you can use, you have not said it. When you do, you…

    Against

    • The country was independent in fact, but had yet to establish a sound government. Samuel Hunginton was the president of the Continental Congress, but that was the Congress that was under no constitution. In 1781 when the Articles of Confederation were ratified, the Contintental…
    • Considering you haven't brought forth anymore arguments, and have not rebutted mine, I shall bring forth a new point, which may be this argument you speak of. I have done more research into the subject, and have discovered John Hanson was not even the first president of the…
  8. 8.

    Andrew Jackson should be removed from the twenty-dollar bill

    For

    • You, the judge, have to properly weigh the arguments laid out in this round and determine who has the convincing arguments of this round. Let us look at some key issues where you should be voting for the affirmation. I will start by addressing the contentions as laid out by…
    • Let us go back to the main points of this round and see why the voting issues point to the affirmation. But first, I will address some minor issues made by my opponent. In my opponent's last post, my opponent stated that I needed to mention a person to replace Jackson on the…

    Against

    • I will now conclude this debate. I would like to thank my opponent for such lively and punctual rounds. It was a pleasure. Key Refutations1. My opponent mentioned three of my rebuttals to his trail of tears point but left out my FOURTH AND FIFTH REBUTTAL, which he failed to…
    • My opponent wishes to take a closer look at this debate. He says that my only rebuttal for his trail of tears point was that we can't judge a 18th century man by twenty first century standards, but this is completely false. I also listed a long rebuttal on the political war…
  9. 9.

    Nationalism caused the collapse of the Habsburg Empire

    For

    • Nationalism plays a crucial role in the transition from empire to nation-state, and it was the major role in the collapse of an entire empire.

    Against

    • Harry Truman wins by knockout!
    • I did not even say anything and he forfeited, I am one good debater!
  10. 10.

    The Pandavas were the rightful heirs to the throne of Hastinapur

    For

    • exactly
    • exactly i agree with you

    Against

    • Sir/Ma'am,If you agreed with my viewpoint, I don't see any reason why you should challenge me.Nevertheless, it was nice arguing.Thank you and all the best!
    • Thank you for your argument.But I'd be remiss if I didn't clarify my stand in this argument to you. I am against the belief that Pandavas had any right to inherit the throne of Hastinapur. Basically, I am of the view that Duryodhan WAS the rightful heir to the throne. From your…
  11. 11.

    The US founding fathers were socialist

    For

    • I accept!I assume Round 1 is for acceptance and terms, because this debate is 5 rounds long and my opponent didn't make an argument in Round 1.To preclude my opponent from debating a straw man, I would like to clarify some terms from the outset. As requested, the following…
    • A few final points:1. Con tried to change the rules at the end of the gameIn Round 1, I clarified that the "Founding Fathers" mentioned in the resolution would refer specifically to "the individuals who actually drafted the Constitution," and that the views of individuals who…

    Against

    • The Delegates to the Constitutional Convention Signers of the Constitution Abraham Baldwin Richard Bassett Gunning Bedford, Jr. John Blair William Blount David Brearly Jacob Broom Pierce Butler Daniel Carroll George Clymer John Dickinson Jonathan Dayton William Few Thomas…
    • All Definitions in this debate will come from Princeton Wordnet; http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu...Socialism is defined as S: (n) socialism (a political theory advocating state ownership of industry) S: (n) socialist economy (an economic system based on state ownership of…
  12. 12.

    Lord Palmerston had anti-American sympathies

    For

    • "In dealing with vulgar minded bullies, and so much unfourtunately the people of the United States are."-Lord Palmerston. "We also are on the verge of the disolution of the United States."-Lord Palmerston in a letter to Queen Victoria. My source for these quotes is a documetary…
    • InfraRedEd keeps on complaining this is a stupid topic he couldn't even win, so why did he pick it in the first place. Note that he has backed away from his burden, that he took on by accepting my challenge to debate. And another thing - I'm not arguing Palmerston was a…

    Against

    • I can only respond to arguments posted by my opponent and visible on the page. I am not going to watch documentaries and read ravings by this lunatic Roger Hughes whoever he is. Links are for supporting your arguments not for making them. YouTube clips especially you notice…
    • Using another debate as an example: Now I have made the point I think that my opponent used this http://www.finitesite.com... to produce this http://www.debate.org... without telling anybody. so What? One thing is lacking here, and it is a good point and one made frequently in…
  13. 13.

    The USSR was the most valuable Allied power in WWII

    For

    • OK, I apologize again for making my debates unclear. When I'm talking about the "smaller countries", I was talking about the non-Tripartite Pact Axis states, such as Hungary and Bulgaria. Why were most of Eastern Europe communist after WWII? Because the Soviet Union controlled…
    • Okay, I admit, that I made the "WWII Every Day" phrase seem unclear. Here's a link to see the battlegrounds every day: If you have seen that YouTube video, you could see that the Soviet Union crashed through Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria. Other than shipments, the Soviet Union…

    Against

    • Your argument made it seem as if the entire reason why the Russians were the most valuable allies was because of Operation Barbarossa and the Soviet Union's harsh winter. You also stated that the Soviet Union crashed through the smaller countries that were taken over by the…
    • I am willing to agree that the Soviet Union was a good ally during WWII, but I am no willing to accept that the Soviets were our best ally. It simply doesn't make sense. First of all, the Soviet Union didn't really join the Allies until Germany invaded the country. Even before…
  14. 14.

    D-Day had no meaningful effect on the outcome of World War II

    For

    • I really would have appreciated if my opponent just said "I accept" instead of stating arguments. Nevertheless, I will write my arguments.Battle of StalingradThe Battle of Stalingrad lasted from 1942-1943 and was Hitler's worst defeat. 850,000 German, Romanian, Hungarian,…
    • D-Day, also known as the Normandy Landings had no effect on the outcome of WWII. In WWII, there were two possible outcomes to the war. Outcome #1: Axis VictoryOutcome #2: Allied VictoryI will be arguing that if D-Day had never happened, Germany would still have lost the war no…

    Against

    • I know D-Day was in France but it also took part in Italy as well. So Fascist strongholds in France would still exsist so thus meaning that German Conscripts would still be alive so reinforcements would be more abundant. Yes defeats in the Eastern Front helped greatly in the…
    • I am a Socialist first off. Now if the allies never performed D-Day France would be under Fascist Controll and also at the battle of Berlin Hitler would have fled to Paris or Other Axis held territory in Western Europe so the Western Powers Canada US & UK would not have been…
  15. 15.

    Mozart was the greatest creative genius in history

    For

    • I do not dispute the greatness of the artists you mention + Bach especially and Beethoven to a lesser extent, but your obvious ignorance of Mozart's music renders your argument mostly void. If you take the trouble to listen to Mozart's great works as suggested you will not only…
    • I greatly admire Leonardo as one of the 3 or 4 greatest artists but creatively he does not match up to the incredible range of Mozart's genius. If you have not seen or heard any of Mozart's great works i.e. the 6 great operas + concertos, requiem etc.. then you are hardly able…

    Against

    • Counter Argument #1 Well the Pro has yet to give any counter to why Leonardo Da Vinci is not the most creative genius. Mozart wrote music which was of his time. There were many other composers at Mozart's time so it was no feat writing music. Leonardo Da Vinci came up with…
    • Opposing Argument #1: Mozart is indeed a good composer however he is not the most creative genius in history. Mozart is good a good composer but this does not make him the most creative genius. The first time I heard of Mozart was in 7th grade music class. The point is that if…
  16. 16.

    Saddam Hussein's rule benefited Iraq

    For

    • Actually it does. After Saddam Hussein was taken out of power, the government became a democracy. This proves that the Iraqi people could not govern themselves. I did not claim Hussein was a good leader, I claimed he was good. And he was. Iraq was far better off with him than…
    • Do not be such a d***. It is an exchange of ideas, do not insult me again. Yes Saddam Hussein killed people and was cruel. But he kept his people controlled and he provided stability to his country. Lets look at modern day Iraq. Bombings occur almost daily. There is a no…

    Against

    • Your statement about ISIS running rampant without him implied that if he was still in control it would subside. Which is absolutely wrong, and perhaps one man did say those things on BBC. There has been refugees coming over to America because of Saddam, how was he a good leader…
    • Saddam Hussein was not a great leader, he killed hundreds of his own citizens so statistically if you are killing thousands of your own people you would eventually kill some terrorist. You fail to realize that ISIS was created way before Saddam's rule, inspiration was what…
  17. 17.

    Listed buildings should be maintained

    For

    • Thank you very much for participating and responding so quickly.
    • Buildings will be carefully assessed and checked before they become listed. Not all old buildings can be listed buildings, only the ones with special interest and importance will be considered. The government will control the amount spent on maintaining them, but after good…

    Against

    • I have no argument for this. I agree with what you have to say here. My business is done.
    • I feel as though protecting them as a symbol of english heritage is nice and everything, however, if it is costing the government money that we don't have or it becomes a public health risk that they should be condemned.
  18. 18.

    Ancient astronaut theory is pseudoscience

    For

    • =======Obelisk=======Con states that he doesn't think the stones were lifted by levers. The fact is, levers were a common tool in ancient Egypt for lifting heavy objects. "The use of wooden levers to lift, shift, or turn over stone blocks was quite common in ancient…
    • Con has violated the round-breakdown outlined in R1 by posting counter-arguments in R2, the round meant for his prima facie case. As such, he has forfeited the conduct point. Since Con barely provided a prima-facie case of his own last round, the only way for con to have even a…

    Against

    • i have already proven my point quite clearly.
    • let me answer his points one by one. 1. obelisk pro did not provide any evidence for the livers with which the stones are lifted. so i think that stones are not lifted that way. 2. moving the stone pro said that a smaller sledge made of ceder wood was used to move the stone but…
  19. 19.

    The US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were justified

    For

    • I'm not even going to start on Wikipedia- the fact that you can edit almost anything into or out of the articles. Second- Yes. The US did attempt diplomatic relations. If the Taliban were our allies, they would have handed him over without a comment. The Taliban DID refuse to…
    • When I meant see the video, I meant be reminded why we got involved in the Middle East's problems in the first place. I do intend to prove that Bush did the "right" thing so don't think you got me by picking at my words. Afghanistan- The goals in the war here were and still are…

    Against

    • I would like to congratulate the affirmative on compiling an intelligent response. However, his arguments fail on several key accounts. 1. First, let me explain why his discrediting of my sources is not to be trusted. "never use Wikipedia for it only tells you what you want to…
    • Definitions: By "we went into" I shall assume my opponent means when Bush deployed US forces into and declared war upon the nation of Iraq and in Afghanistan. Right-in conformance with justice or law or morality Justice - concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality,…
  20. 20.

    Andrew Jackson was the best of the first 22 US presidents

    For

    • Andrew Jackson was a badmamajama. He stood against the establishment and went down in history because he didn't take any crap from anybody.

    Against

    • Well it is obvious that my opponent did not want to finish what he started. Please allot me all of the points, thank you!
    • Its a shame that my opponent has decided to forfeit a debate that he started. Hopefully he comes back for next round.
  21. 21.

    The Scottish Lowlands should apologize for the Highland Clearances

    For

    • Thank you, but there is a lot of problems with the statement that "England didn't care for Scotland." That is a major error. If an part of England hated any part of Scotland, it was the north and the Midlands.Thank you, your arguments a good as well.Aye, in this case it was…
    • I myself a highlander, unfortunately must defend the horrific acts done against us. Yet in a way they we necessary, these new breeds of sheep were making the highland lord (now land lords) very wealthy and these lord were evicting people for the sake of profit. Some of these…

    Against

    • Thank you, your arguments a good as well. Now, modernity is a very subjective term, bro. Is everything that's modern necessarily good? Aye, in this case it was sure the people were not treated as they should but you have to look at the big picture. As I said before If the…
    • I myself a highlander, unfortunately must defend the horrific acts done against us. Yet in a way they we necessary, these new breeds of sheep were making the highland lord (now land lords) very wealthy and these lord were evicting people for the sake of profit. Some of these…
  22. 22.

    Decisive battles have shaped history more than political events

    For

    • Spanish ArmadaIn August 1588, one of the largest fleets ever made was put together. The Spanish Armada of over 130 warships were poised to invade Great Britain. Britain's navy had only about 50 ships to defend the island. Each Spanish ship also held some 300 soldiers. This was…
    • Battle of GettysburgThis battle is considered the turning point in the American Civil War. Just like Stalingrad, the battle started out with a rougly small force. A Union cavalry brigade commanded by Brigadier General John Buford and a division of Condeferate infantry commanded…

    Against

    • The Battle of Austerlitz Napoleons 'perfect battle' in which absolutely CRUSHED the Russian and Austrian forces within Europe. This battle alone ended the Third Coalition against Napoleon, solidified his alliance with Prussia at that time. It was the first and only (to the best…
    • Operation Neptune / Invasion of Normandy / Operation Overlord / Omaha Beach The significance is pretty straight forward and clear. It marks the first time the Germans are unable to advance as the allied forces teamed up to liberate Vinchy France from the Axis. Not only did it…
  23. 23.

    Abraham Lincoln was a bad president

    For

    • Lincoln didn't give a crap about the Slaves he only cared about his county. Slaves in the CSA thought it was a blessing to be freed by his proclamation, Lincoln freed them from the states that applied to make the South poor and make them bail out on agriculture. The Confederacy…
    • Thanks for accepting :) I think Lincoln was not the best president the Country had because he took the rights away from several states to tax them higher then the Northern states because of agriculture was more expensive than industrial uses. Many Northern didn't believe in war…

    Against

    • It doesn't matter what a President says while passing law, it's the law that matters. And in this case, the EP and 13th Amendment, while potentially contrasting with Lincoln's spoken position on slavery during the Stephen Douglas debates, have not had their impact changed…
    • Alright, point by point rebuttals. Id like to note that pro seems to have confused "good" with "best", and that this argument he has posted is a verbatim replica of an earlier debate. Nevertheless, here I go: 1. "I think Lincoln was not the best president the Country had…
  24. 24.

    Revenge justifies the atomic and carpet bombings in World War II

    For

    • 1.Revenge is a subset of the greater good of the US (uncontested) Things in the greater good of the US is a good justification (conceded) Therefore by syllogism, Revenge is a good justification. 2.Revenge is a subset of natural instincts and natural actions(uncontested) Things…
    • Indeed this is a debate about the justification for the use of the weapons. And as such, all my points are valid and address the topic at hand. 1. The Greater Good of the United States Actions taken for the greater good of the United States is a pretty good justification for…

    Against

    • 1. OK, so doing something for the greater good of the US may be a good justification but that is not the point of the debate but if you want to use that point, prove to me that revenge through use of the a-bombs is justified. I am not talking about whether the a-bombs were good…
    • I would just like to clarify that this is not a debate about the use of the weapons but the justification for the use of the weapons. So your first point is completely invalid and not addressing the topic at hand. The second point is very similar to the first and is also not…
  25. 25.

    China could have won the Second Sino-Japanese War without US intervention

    For

    • Hello, I would like to invtie someone to come debate this. I'm actually just bored. Semi-trolling allowed, but keep it serious enough that it can be kept serious for voters.This is my 2nd debate, so feedback would be nice.Defenitions:China- The Republic of ChinaJapan- The…
    • dang finals -.-Sorry, I forfiet this round. Go ahead and vote for Con to win. Sorry I couldn't finish =(

    Against

    • Very well.
    • Thanks Crux. == Europe == I provided evidence that the USSR could not have won without the lend-lease program, which would not have existed if we were not helping the Chinese at all. The Nazi soldiers from the Western Front would have killed an additional 2 million Soviet…
  26. 26.

    William the Conqueror had the right to invade Britain and become King of England

    For

    • REBUTTALAlthough I did not intend for the second round for rebuttals, as I did not explicitly state so I suppose I can't complain. Let's move on to my own rebuttals, shall we?My opponent starts off his argument by disproving, or at least challenging the idea that Harold…
    • ARGUMENTMy opening argument for this round will be a bit short, so there will be none of my cherished subdivisions. Instead, before I get into the specifics of my argument, I would like to give a brief description of the history involved with this debate. This is to serve as a…

    Against

    • Re-rebuttal (whoops)First, I'd like to apologise about rebutting too soon, I didn't realise (whoops).My opponent states thusly: 'In simpler terms, even though it is possible that Harold gave the oath under duress, the legality of the oath does not change. Therefore Harold…
    • Thank you, A-I, for, again, allowing me to debate you on an interesting historical topic. Let us begin.Harold GodwinesonI would like to start not by putting my argument forwards, but instead by addressing a historical matter.My opponent asserts thusly: 'There, the Normans…
  27. 27.

    George W. Bush was a great president

    For

    • Goerge w bush was a great president He 1. he reformed medicare with prescription drugs 2. He passed the bush tax cuts which led to the largest economic boom in history 3. He balanced the budget 4. he won the war on terror 5. he resotred dignity and honor to the white hosue 6.…

    Against

    • http://www.youtube.com...
    • Need I say more?http://www.youtube.com...
  28. 28.

    The atomic bombings of Japan were justified

    For

    • Round one will be devoted to stating your position. Round two is supporting your stated opinion with cited resources, no refuting will occur. Rounds three and four will be devoted to refuting points. My position: As the "pro", I will, in essence, use real, cited resources to…

    Against

    • My opponent has forfeited each round. Extend all arguments.
    • My opponent has forfeited. Extend arguments.
  29. 29.

    The atomic bombing of Hiroshima was necessary

    For

    • You have studied Japanese philosophy, I see. However, as I said, the Emperor at that time, Hirohito, was uncompromising. His men were fanatics and he was, as you said, seen as a god. He probably believed that he could not be defeated, so he would not surrender. His surrender…
    • Let us begin. People have argued, since 1945, that the famous nuclear bombing of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which brought a final end to World War 2, was unnecessary. I maintain that it was necessary because it was simply the only way to end the war. The…

    Against

    • The Emperor stays Ultimately, Japan was allowed to keep her Emperor. But the Emperor's retention was not established with complete explicitness at the time of Japan's surrender. Two main factors helped Japan's doves resolve the issue: The atomic bomb had shown the doves that…
    • The Japanese treated their leaders as if they were gods. This is a key point. There had to be a way to end the war and save the leaders 'face'. So a peace treaty that states the ruler can stay in power may have created the wanted effect.
  30. 30.

    Macedon was a Greek kingdom

    For

    • Ok you have forfeited that round but let me add that the people of FYROM have been known to steal other sources and make it look like their own so that's evidence that they are obviously trying to falsify history!
    • Okay now let's get into the subject. Now we all know that Greece and FYROM (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) are arguing about the history of Macedonia. Now with Greece's views, it has been known that the Ancient Kingdom of Macedon was clearly a Greek Kingdom due to…

    Against

    • Greetings, gotta say, this is quite a hard topic, I may not win, but I will try.Good luck! "Aut vincere aut mori."
  31. 31.

    Gaddafi's leadership was a net gain for Libya

    For

    • Thank you for accepting. I would measure the benefit of a particular leader or regime in the quality of life for the people for which that regime provides. If you value this as well, then Mummar Gaddafhi was truly a great leader.If you hold true that a nation which sends aide…
    • The Burden of Proof is shared. All Welcome(no quitters).

    Against

    • Good luck, have fun.
    • I will sum up the main points of this debate and explain how in each area, Gaddafi's cons outweigh his pros. Civil WarMy opponent claims that due to the rebels' actions during the revolution, "it absolutley justifies millitary action". This is not true. In order for Gaddafi's…
  32. 32.

    No republic has lasted longer than three centuries

    For

    • What was the name of the law, and where can I find it on the internet? A political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them. I merely followed your example of an Asian boy. Surly he must be purely Asian and purely boy,…
    • Where did the Romans write that a dictator could only rule in military emergencies for 6 months with absolute power and then step down? Isn't that a power and duty of a government?

    Against

    • That was written down actually, among countless other laws decreed by the Roman Republic, otherwise, we woul have no knowledge of such now. As for the USA, define a "pure democracy."
    • Just because you are more than one thing, doesn't mean you don't count for the other. If you are an Asian boy, would you not be purely Asian? Anyway, all that you stated for a constitution is encompassed within a set of basic laws and rights.
  33. 33.

    Ninjas would beat Spartans in combat

    For

    • Thank you for your timely response. A few points: I do not agree that in order to prove that someone is superior they have to 'fight it out'. My opponent suggested that people engage in violent confrontations to prove superiority, but this is not true; debate is a prime example…
    • sorry for the second round, me and john decided to have a three round debate. for clarification i will offer the following definition: superior as defined by wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn, is: of high or superior quality or performance. my value for this debate will be…

    Against

    • Thank you, first I'd like to state my case, and then I'd like address some statements that my opponent has made. (This is in LD format, right?) I stand in firm negation of the resolution the states: "Ninjas are superior to Spartans in every way." I'll offer some of the…
    • Hi there, I'm John. I'll post my argument after the Pro constructive.
  34. 34.

    The USSR contributed as much as the US to defeating the Axis

    For

    • Well there isn't really any point in continuing this. Con is no good.
    • I will now state my arguments. ARGUMENT I: Soviet Military Contributions in the Far East.A common myth about WWII is that the United States won the war against Japan almost single handedly. This is untrue for several reasons. First off, about a third of the Japanese war deaths…

    Against

    • Thanks for the debate.
    • The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) provided many great advantages to the allied war effort. In fact the USSR lost the largest number of military fatalities by any single nation in the Second World War. The sacrifice of those men and many civilian casualties can not…
  35. 35.

    Rome was a better empire than Greece

    For

    • what I meant by better was who contributed the most to the advances in technology, literature ,society
    • I believe that Greece was the better empire for one Greece created democracy also they had such great philosophers like Socrates, Plato , and Aristotle

    Against

    • Okay well, this still wasn't very specific and as the instigator, I feel that you should be presenting your arguments for Greece first. I want to first clarify what I mean when I say you haven't outlined your argument in order to give you one last opportunity to do so before I…
    • Greece was not an empire, so this entire discussion is null and void. However, if you wish to debate which 'civilization' was 'better', I am happy to do so, but first, you will need to define what you mean by 'better'; otherwise this is just a statement of opinion and there is…
  36. 36.

    King Richard III authorized the killing of the Princes in the Tower

    For

    • Hey it's your friend Kylar :). I believe that King Richard III of England ordered the killing of King Edward V and his brother Richard of Shrewsbury in the Tower of London aka The Princes In The Tower. I have reasonable proof of that claim and I love a good debate on it. I am…
    • Thank you once again for the debate :). I believe that Richard's throne was in serious doubt. He usurped the throne, and while Henry Tudor did the same thing, Richard usurped the throne after killing his nephew's friends. That alone would stain his record as the true king.…

    Against

    • Ok, the princes were declared illegitimate, so they posed no threat. However, when Tudor declared his wife-to-be legitimate, he declared the brothers, which was an accidental result of this,so Tudor needed a claim, as not many liked him-Armchair Readers Amazing book of…
    • The princes were in the tower, and as such it was possible to have been hidden their life from everyone, and as neither of us can be proven correct, we are both incorrect until proven otherwise, and once again, why not tell the truth of the matter the second your king? Why wait…
  37. 37.

    The Confederate flag should be banned in public spaces

    For

    • Considering that when it comes to imagery, literally nothing is banned in the U.S. including the swastika, so no I don't think it should be banned. Whether or not it's tasteful or not is another debate entirely, but I tend to like to leave banning imagery to 3rd world dictators.

    Against

    • I realize I used some conflicting language in reference to what I was Con to... so you should probably take away my conduct points for my stupidity -.- Because I'm on the same side as my opponent, so there's no debate to be had. Sorry for wasting your time.
    • Topic More Thoroughly Explained: The question is whether or not the Confederate Flag should be allowed to exist in America. I am Con. The First Round will be for acceptance. Please note the response periods are 48 hours, as opposed to the default 72 hours.
  38. 38.

    The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World should be reconstructed

    For

    • Now a team of young European architects has concocted an immodest proposal to resurrect a supersized 21st-century version of the original statue, considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. The team behind the Colossus of Rhodes Project developed the idea in the…
    • No, you've got it all wrong. It's so sad how the 7 Wonders all collapsed, we've got to reconstruct it. Such work will help people get jobs and decrease the unemployment rate. Also, it will help people gain a deeper understanding of history. There. I said it. You don't need to…

    Against

    • Wow, the last argument. OK, here we go. I think I can last through it. Through this debate, I've gotten pretty bored, but I'll humor you, just so we can get this thing over with. Your round 5 argument is the most deeply flawed one I've seen yet, because first you talk about a…
    • I thought we were done with this debate. I hoped we were. Now we gotta go through another round. Oh well. It's not sad that the 7 wonders all collapsed. I mean, it is sad, but they didn't collapse because of a volcano exploding or something, they collapsed because things change…
  39. 39.

    Andrew Jackson was a good president

    For

    • Round 1: Opening Round 2: Rebuttal Round 3: Closing Rules: Cite sources Drops are concessions Andrew Jackson was a great president and leader. For this debate, I define "good president" as one that benefits their citizens. Contention 1: Economy Andrew Jackson helped the…
    • First off, I would like to apologize if I come off as "boastful", as the Con claims, for stating a point goes Pro. However, it seems as a typical debate in which you claim points go your way. ConclusionAmerican IndiansThis argument is sufficiently rebutted. The natives were not…

    Against

    • C.1. Indian removal act This is certainly one of the biggest flaws of Andrew Jackson. In this act Andrew Jackson can be equal to Hitler . My opponent described "good" as beneficial to its own people. However, the Native Americans were not considered citizens up 1924. But,…
    • Thanks for the reply ProR.1 American Indians While it is true to some extent that Andrew Jackson was not the sole cause of the conditions of the present day Indians, we can see how he was a major contributor to it. After the tear of trails (which was Jackson's responsibility),…
  40. 40.

    The Egyptian revolution has been a success

    For

    • Thanks for that wonderful reply master Ahmad Opponent: I am not sure this is a valid statement since this is not backed up by facts. It is only rumours transmitted between people - I'm very sorry i didn't cite my source however a quick search in Google will tell you everything…
    • A wonderful start by my veteran opponent. I personally believe that the previous government required drastic changes that couldn't have happened while former president Hosni Moubark was in power. He overstayed his visit, so to speak, by changing the constitution of Egypt. The…

    Against

    • Thank you for that Mr Mostafa. I will start by rebutting some of your points. Opponent: I personally believe that the previous government required drastic changes that couldn't have happened while former president Hosni Moubark was in power. -Whilst I agree with the fact that…
    • Let me start by congratulating my opponent for his excellent English language skills. On the 25th of January 2011, the spark that lit the revolution in Egypt against all forms of mistreatment and mass thievery happened. The people flooded the streets with their wants for…
  41. 41.

    Alexander Hamilton did more than others to create the Constitution

    For

    • I will do my best to show that while George Washington did much to bring the Constitution of the United States to life, Alexander Hamilton's achievements surpassed those of Washington. Winning the War of Independence. No one can deny George Washington's achievements during the…
    • In this round I will continue to present a few other points as to why Alexander Hamilton should be the founding father most credited with bringing the Constitution to life. I will save all rebuttals towards my opponents points for the last round. The First Presidential Cabinet.…

    Against

    • I unfortunately am going to have to concede this round due to a busy work week, but I plan on being back for R4. Please proceed to counterarguments.
    • "Your name could not be spared." – James Madison to George Washington, Independence Hall, 1787. "I am persuaded, if you were determined to attend the Convention, and it should be generally known, it would induce the Eastern States to send Delegates to it." – Henry Knox, letter…
  42. 42.

    The annexation of Texas by the United States was inevitable

    For

    • The first leg of the destiny of annexation occurred when Mexico agreed to let Stephen F. Austin let Anglo settlers from the USA enter Texas and make their own colonies. Coming from America, these citizens did not like to be told what to say, what to believe in, and what to do.…
    • Please know the time period of The Texas Revolution era.Round one will be acceptance and the following rounds will be you proving your point. Please accept if you are knowledgable of the subject!Sincerely,Prodigy

    Against

    • All points extended.
    • I thank my oppenent for this debate, but my opponent apparently needs a lession in history to realize that this annexation wasn't going to happen.Contention 1: US didn't want TexasI'll give it that a lot of Texans were Americans, but we do have to realize that neither the Whigs…
  43. 43.

    Portugal was the most successful imperial power

    For

    • Case 1: Portugese Colonies were incredibly wealthyIn order to properly anaylize the success of the Portugese, we must break up their imperial tendencies into era's. Let us quickly define each era.....Era 1: Portugese Early ExplorationEra 2: Contemporary Colonial Period of the…
    • I will be arguing that Portugal was the most successful imperial power. My opponent will argue otherwise.If you need any more clarifications, please say so in the comments.

    Against

    • This will be easy. There's no way you can put forth a convincing debate that Portugal is/was the most successful imperial power of all time. I will be surprised if you defeat me in this.
    • Claim about me lieing about my definition/sources: Incorrect. Did you even click my link? The very first definition is the one that I copied. Please do not throw around the word "lier" like you have repetitvely when you are incorrect with that assessment. Are you using a…
  44. 44.

    Franklin D. Roosevelt was not a great president

    For

    • Thank you for challenging me. I will allow you to make an argument before I respond.
    • FDR is made out to be a top five president in American history. This is not the case. The New Deal did not stop or even slow down the Great Depression. Actually it hurt it. After FDR's New Deal legislation was passed, unemployment went up and the US hit another recession. What…

    Against

    • Con Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote ConCon Vote…
    • FDr was handsome and cured aids. And brought pens to poor people
  45. 45.

    The Tiger was the greatest tank of World War II

    For

    • You raise a good point, manpower was a luxury that Germany struggled to attain, considering the constant pounding they took from the seemingly endless industrial machines the allies possessed, but you lost me when you said that the gun on the T-35 had a higher velocity then the…
    • So, your claiming that the T-34 is superior over the tiger because of its speed? Are we taking anything else into consideration? I suppose all light tanks were the greatest because of their speed, at least that's according to you. And your final statement "Plus it consumes many…

    Against

    • I'm sorry for a mistake. By "It consumes a lot of gasoline" I mean the Tiger.,Which is the main reason why it was out of action. If you want another reason why the Tiger was not so good tank. Here's the list: 1) the Tiger requires more crews than the T-35. Men was very…
    • In my opinion, T-34 was the best tank. It's faster, with 34 mph, while the TIger's max speed is 24 mph. Plus it consumes many gasoline.
  46. 46.

    John Adams was a better president than Thomas Jefferson

    For

    • But because I'm alive - I can be a better judge
    • I think John Adams was better because he was elected first

    Against

    • Given that I am John Adams - just because I'm dead doesn't mean I don't have self respect
    • But I get the last word....nya nya
  47. 47.

    Nelson Mandela is overrated

    For

    • Fair enough, if you read my past debates you'll understand that i seldom argue irrationally, but i digress that is besides the point. I must also acknowledge that i respect what Mandela has done as a person, he has certainly acheived what most men will never achieve.…
    • People call Nelson Mandela a hero, but they don't really know the truth about him. The media makes him this hero, and people eat it up like sweet cakes. Mandela was a terrorist and also a huge racist. In 1961, Nelson Mandela, together with the South African Communist Party…

    Against

    • I'll refrain from piling on additional accounts of Mandela's remarkable achievement. Pro has argued that Nelson Mandela's public achievements were less than admirable and that he is not the great man that his international reputation acclaims. To support the argument, Pro has…
    • Thanks, Emmo, for your thoughtful argument. Winnie Mandela denies ever making the statements Pro quoted: http://www.guardian.co.uk... Further, Ms. Mandela states: "I will in the coming days deal with what I see as an inexplicable attempt to undermine the unity of my family, the…
  48. 48.

    Germany could have won WWII by limiting expansion

    For

    • In light of my opponent forfeiting round 2, I will let my previous argument stand. I could add supporting evidence in this round, but I don't think it would be fair, as the previous round has not been addressed yet.
    • I will argue that Germany could have won WWII if they had limited their advancement to the continent only, and had not attacked Britain. Here are supporting facts: 1. Germany easily overtook the whole European continent in 3 years, with a far superior military, and tactics. All…

    Against

    • I accept. This shall be interesting.
  49. 49.

    Ronald Reagan was a better president than Andrew Jackson

    For

    • My opponent seemed to also ignore my source I placed in the second round.
    • My RefutationsAndrew JacksonMy opponent basically stated the pros and the cons of Andrew Jackson's presidency. In fact, he stated more negatives than he did positives, proving how bad Jackson's presidency was. My opponent's positives were:"-He attacked corruption in the federal…

    Against

    • this is all opinion u have no facts
    • if round 1 was just saying that i accept then i'll state my case again He's "complex." Positives: -He attacked corruption in the federal government, which he distrusted. But he also helped prevent an early Civil War. In the 1830s South Carolina nullified a federal law and…
  50. 50.

    Compromises delayed women's suffrage in the United States

    For

    • Type your rebuttal in the final round.
    • Based on my subsequent information, you'll see that offering 3/5 of a vote to women is actually quite generous. First of all, the main role of the government is to protect its citizens and enforce its laws to achieve this. I would like to first mention that women are not…

    Against

    • Its not working
    • Its erroring I can't see your argument

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.