Health Debate Topics for Students — page 2
716 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 51.
Addiction should not be classified as a disease
For
- Most people assume "addiction" as the most heard of drug and alcohol but there are many ranging from A-Z. I argue that a person could develop a addiction to hording teddy bears (for example) I quote you on this" Whether the addiction a person has is to alcohol, drugs, gambling,…
- To refresh my answer Addiction (depending on the individual) may be any compulsive act repeated over and over. Now I ask my opponent, why is it that when real consequences are taking place, Broken Heart Syndrome would not be considered a disease? My answer having a "broken…
Against
- My opponent made a new argument in the final round so I shall first briefly address that and then outline the reasons why I have won the round.RebuttalTeddybearitisUnder my definition of addiction, which has been dropped by my opponent, an addiction must be harmful to the user.…
- DefinitionsAddictionMy opponent tries to finally offer a definition for addiction in round 3. However she admits that her definition depends on the individual, making it impossible to objectify, unlike my definition which has an objective standard of harm. She has also failed…
- 52.
The US should not adopt universal publicly funded health care
For
- For three reasons, I feel that having universal and publicly funded health care in America would not only be detrimental to our economy and our national beliefs, but it would not be efective, and would only harm Americans: 1. There isn't a single government agency or division…
Against
- TheLibertarian has failed to respond to any of my points or ideas; which are, in brief: 1. No industrialized nation except for us lacks some sort of universal health care system. It's a basic right. We are the richest nation in the world, and yet 47 million of us lack any…
- I wanted to go into more specifics about the second point that I made in my first argument (about cost and GDP per capita). Health technology is radically behind almost every other industry. Most medical records are still kept on paper. Costs will radically decrease if medical…
- 53.
Smoking in pubs should not be banned
For
- I am indebted to my opponent for this information and will certainly bear this in mind the next time I hold an All-American Junk Food-themed dinner party – perhaps I should consider replacing those cigars I usually serve in hotdog buns with something slightly more palatable - a…
- As everybody knows, drinking and smoking go together like fried patties of beef and bread buns - which put together are called 'beef burgers' (except in America where for some reason they call them 'hamburgers', even though there is absolutely no ham in them at all). Now, where…
Against
- As my opponent has forfeited this round, I have no argument to respond to. So, I have decided to quickly pay my attention to the comments. RoyLathman You talked about the use of air purifiers which are very effective at cleaning indoor air and sucking out airborne pollutants as…
- To open my argument, I would like to first point out that you have contradicted yourself with the following sentence, "public houses (pubs, bars, etc. ) are private premises. " If they were private premises they would be called private houses and not public. However, public…
- 54.
Child and adolescent mental health services need major reform
For
- You have not stumped me and I sincerely apologise for not posting on the last round. My argument, much like yours, comes from personal experience. Since the age of 11 I have been working with camhs off and on and still to this day, 6 years later, it has gotten me nowhere. I…
- The UK Children's mental health services is costing more money than it is benefiting children and needs a major reform immediately.
Against
- Sorry "Have I stumped you?" is just my default sentence for when someone doesn't reply. I too sincerely apologize, as I know realize that you are right. I misunderstood the first part of the message and thought you meant EVERY mental health clinic in the UK, but yes, you are…
- Have I stumped you?To be fair, there are times when it can be hard to find the right help, but I had first-hand experience of this, and it wasn't so hard to get the help I needed.
- 55.
Junk food should be banned from schools
For
- Because Con has given me a lot to refute, I will begin my rebuttals now. Rebuttals Con begin by listing three issues with my stance. The first included the fact that students should be able to make their own choices. It seems I predicted Con's stance correctly, for I refuted…
- Next, I would like to say that I throughly agree with Con's forfeiting rule, and I can assure him that there will be no forfeiting by me in this debate. After agreeing with my rules, Con went on to ask some questions about the topic. They are good questions, for they will make…
Against
- I'll start by thanking my opponent for an intriguing debate. I appreciate his perspective greatly, as well as his arguments, and I feel that this has been a solid debate over the issues involved in schools affording students access to junk food. That being said, I will use this…
- I'd like to s tart by thanking my opponent for setting out a very reasonable, well thought out case in favor of the resolution, and for providing the information I requested. I view what he has provided as sufficient, and will therefore function on that basis. As this round is…
- 56.
Smokers are fully able to choose to quit
For
- i smoke weed and i was lost i said i cant find my house where do i live i love weed im smoking right now jk but i love weed
Against
- Obviously, this is not a great topic. I will show one more example to show what I mean, since the previous argument I made sounds ineffective in hindsight. Saying that smokers can choose to stop smoking is like saying that people can choose to roll a one every time on a dice.…
- I forgot to include tobacco in the definition of smokers. Not like it matters because of my troll opponent though. UPDATED DEFINITION OF SMOKERS: A person who smokes tobacco regularly. With that out of the way, I will present an argument. Some smokers are able to quit smoking,…
- 57.
Increasing health aid to sub-Saharan Africa would reduce malaria cases
For
- We should increase out giving because malaria is a treatable and preventable diseas and action must be taken. Every min. five children will die from malria. With a smiple package of commodites we would be able to stop these needles deaths. Plan 1. Require that the funding of…
Against
- Well, under the rules of a Policy debate, my opponent conceded every single attack, and agrees her plan isn't inherent, cannot solve, is not justifying the resolution, and has no advantages. For these reasons, I urge a vote in negation. Thank you.
- Well, under the rules of policy debate (the format that softball06 made this debate in) Pro just lost. She just, technically, dropped all arguments... and in policy: "Silence Is Compliance". However, this isn't the exact same as Policy debate, and so I'll give her the benefit…
- 58.
The United States should guarantee universal healthcare for its citizens
For
- Contention 1- The State must provide HC Turn his argument against him, I do agree with the fact that the United States has a Constitution, however this works in the affirmatives favor, "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay…
- C1. The State must provide HC It is a part of its obligation to protect citizens, Gary E. Jones, professor of Philosophy explains, "the proper function of the State is to provide basic protection to its citizens (then) there seems to be a basis for the right to at least minimal…
Against
- As my opponent has graciously and kindly pointed out, I have made a series of errors which cannot be corrected at this point in the debate.
- Response to C1:It seems to me that you are quoting Professors, and then summarizing their views in a few short sentence after doing so. It is your job to be providing reasoning, not quotes.The United States of America has a Constitution, by which everyone with the boundaries of…
- 59.
The Affordable Care Act has more benefits than drawbacks for society
For
- "Prior to the Affordable Care Act in the United States, healthcare was still treated as a necessity and not as a commodity."Untrue. http://thinkprogress.org...http://economy.money.cnn.com...http://www.cato.org...http://money.cnn.com...(notice these are counted in thousands of…
- I believe the Affordable Care Act is a step in the right direction for our country, and ultimately better than the unregulated insurance marketplace that we had before. Con is arguing against the A.C.A. Just to be clear, that means his burden is to show that it is more negative…
Against
- Hello, so since my opponent has forfeited the final round and thus I have no remaining points to rebut, I would like to use this final speech to summarize why the Con has won this debate and why the Affordable Care Act is in fact more harmful than helpful to our society.…
- But first I would like to point out a key flaw which resonates throughout the opponent's argument. The pro side seems to be under the impression that, within a capitalist society, it is somehow reasonable that an insurance company would value the needs of society over their own…
- 60.
Ban the promotion of diets
For
- Selling to the vulnerable
- Inventing the idea of fat
Against
- Countercase; Tackling food advertising
- It's my body and I'll starve if I want to
- 61.
Tobacco should be banned entirely
For
- I am sorry that I was unable to respond last round, so this round I will try best to clarify and defend my points. Contention 1-Constitutionality While I appreciate my opponet's respect for the constitution, I believe that he is a little bit behind the times. Since when does…
- === Resolution === Special taxes put upon the sale of a tobacco product, outside of sales tax, ought to be illegalized by the government. === Definitions === Special taxes-any tax that is imposed on the purchase of a tobacco product, but not levied on other products. Sales tax…
Against
- Extend all arguments. Banning tobacco taxes would be unconstitional.
- Contention 1-: It would be unconstitutional for the federal government to illegalize special taxes on tobacco. I would like to point to the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 8 [1]. It lists all powers of Congress. Congress does not have the power to make local or…
- 62.
Breastfeeding in public should be legally protected
For
- Many people are disgusted by a woman breastfeeding her child in public. I personally do not see the issue, so please enlighten me.
- It should be up for the mothers to decide. If they feel uncomfortable and vulnerable in public they can do it in private, but if they feel the need to do it while in a public place they should be able to without people staring and telling them to do it in private. If people do…
Against
- Technically I have nothing against breastfeeding in public, and I support it fully but I do understand why some people could be offended or put off by it, so I would also argue that it should be a courtesy to do it privately. The breast is seen as, not just an organ for…
- While in theory, and in a perfect world the idea that a woman was to breastfeed without causing themselves or others embarrassment would be pro and undisputed. Logical even. I agree, breastfeeding should not be considered embarrassing, yet it still is for many. Yes women should…
- 63.
High school health classes exaggerate risks and conceal the truth
For
- I understand where your coming from but they are lying, look at your definition number 2 and 6 Lie - 1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood. 2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; 6. to express…
- your right in some cases but i still think they are not telling the whole truth yes they can say its bad and they can say that we shouldn't do it but that does not make give them reason to lie to us The youth are lacking information leading them into curiousity ive never done…
Against
- "a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive" Their statements are not false. "something intended or serving to convey a false impression;" They are not intending to serve such a false impression, they are teaching what they are told to. "to express what is false;…
- "yes they can say its bad and they can say that we shouldn't do it but that does not make give them reason to lie to us The youth are lacking information leading them into curiousity" Giving you a lack of information is not liing. Lie - 1. a false statement made with deliberate…
- 64.
The government should nationalize health care
For
- "Sure it is not Nationalized healthcare but the point of my entire argument is that almost everything the government touches fails, education is a perfect example of that." 1)It is wrong to say the Government is so detrimental. The quality of life in the US would be a lot worse…
- My opponent begins by talking about how the HMO act of 1973 did not work and relates that because this government intervention failed, then nationalized health care will also fail. However this is wrong for 3 reasons 1)The HMO act of 1973 was NOT nationalized health care. If we…
Against
- My opponent states: "The HMO act of 1973 was NOT nationalized health care. " Sure it is not Nationalized healthcare but the point of my entire argument is that almost everything the government touches fails, education is a perfect example of that. The fact is, is that the very…
- I will start off telling you about the current status quo of our healthcare. The healthcare system has been shot through with GOVERNMENT interventions already. For example, the HMO act of 1973, our brilliant minds in congress decided that we should force employers to offer…
- 65.
Fat people live longer than thin people
For
- Thank you for posting your.....argument? Screwed: fastened with screws, or cheated. My opponent has no way of proving that he is fastened with screws or has been cheated. I thank my opponent for this debate. http://www.youtube.com...
- Thank you for posting your next argument. Here is a clip from the New York times news, "About two years ago, a group of federal researchers reported that overweight people have a lower death rate than people who are normal weight, underweight or obese. Now, investigating…
Against
- My retardness is kicking in.
- :0 I'm screwed......
- 66.
The internet is responsible for the increase in mental health issues in youth
For
- The internet has become such a huge part of our lives, Especially in adolescence, So big that people can feel symptoms of withdrawal as well as being unable to function normally without regular online contact from there devices because we put such a mental dependence on online…
- mental health has been affected on the internet because of cyberbullying. Cyberbullying has been linked to depression, Anxiety, Social isolation, And suicide. Compared to "traditional" forms of bullying, Cyberbullying can be witnessed by a larger audience, The perpetrator can…
Against
- Social media is not the reason as to why there is an increase in mental health issues, Especially in the youth, Because although it may contribute, It can not take the full blame. Media can be beneficial in many other ways, Such as to communicate or to find support and escape…
- Social media is not the reason as to why there is an increase in mental health issues, Especially in the youth, Because it's not the media that is affecting them, It's actually the people behind the screens. Every problem on the internet can be traced to something and it is…
- 67.
Tobacco should be banned
For
- Since when did a ban on the SALE of cigarettes affect the rights to economic ownership? It is illegal to sell plutonium to non-professionals. Should we make it legal to sell because of the economic ownership principle?
- Show me the Constitutional amendment that says a ban on the sale of cigarettes is unconstitutional. It's not the first, since free speech doesn't cover odors. It's not the fourth, since we wouldn't have to break into homes to stop the sale of tobacco. It's not the 21st, that is…
Against
- I don't think you understand the point of my argument.Tobacco is a legal product. In order to ban it, you need to find a basis to remove that legality. So far, you have offered only a few opinions on why this legality should be removed:1) Tobacco is bad for you2) Second-hand…
- Thanks for responding. It is important at this point to acknowledge that Pro has completely dropped and disregarded his argument about second-hand smoke. It can thus be assumed that this argument is no longer a factor in this debate. The government has no right to restrict…
- 68.
The FDA does more harm than good
For
- I will respond to each of Con's rebuttals. 1. That earlier attempts at prohibiting alcohol failed doesn't change the fact that the FDA allows you to use these dangerous substances while restricting access to widely used, low-risk medicines, like antibiotics. Here's another…
- 1. My first point is philosophical; if the FDA is concerned for the public health, why does the FDA allow you to smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol until you're sick, but then restrict your access to medicines that can make you better? 2. There is a revolving door between the…
Against
- 1) the reason Tylenol doesn't need a prescription is because it is a safe drug whereas other medicines, including antibiotics, may have consequences depending on medical history or other drugs you are taking. .. . 2) I'm not citing the FDA there I read their mission statement…
- I will respond to each of the Con's points then present arguments about the full function of the FDA 1) The problem with banning cigarettes and alcohol is that both have had deep routes in American history (Tobacco was America's first cash crop that helped the nation grow, Beer…
- 69.
The United States should adopt universal healthcare
For
- First, I would like to start off by saying you are well versed on this issue and would like to compliment you on that. Second, I'm not saying that we should completely move towards socialized medicine like that of Sweden or France or England. I'm saying that we need something…
- the United states needs universal healthcare because #1. our system now is crap #2. The deductables and copays are way too excessive. #3. doctors arent focused on treating the patient as much as making sure the hospital gets paid #4. With Universal healthcare, sure the gov't…
Against
- I will take it easy on you. Lets face it man, we all want to help people and everyone should be given care in our society. We try and do what we can but everyone cannot be happy. It is ridiculous the amount of money it costs for things these days. Some would say that is because…
- The United States should not have Universal Healthcare Pro claims: #1. our system now is crap Many countries provide universal insurance but deny critical procedures to patients who need them. Britain's Department of Health reported in 2006 that at any given time, nearly…
- 70.
The United States should ban smoking in public places
For
- I will close my argument with this. Smoking Bans are NOT about a smoker's health. They are about the health and consideration of non-smokers . With smoking bans in place, there will still be plenty of places for smokers to enjoy a cigar or a cigarette. They can smoke in smoking…
- The real issue here is public health, and consideration for others. First, I will discuss public health. Your remarks regarding public health a a bit ridiculous. My opponent said: "There are some who insist that smoking bans are intended to protect the the public health. If…
Against
- You have made several fallacies in your argument. 1) //Smoking doesn't have a chance of hurting you. IT DOES.// ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A quick review of the statistics reveals you're mistaken with this assumption. Out of the…
- Smoking bans encompass a severe form of collectivism that is beyond the scope in which the American form of Democratic government is intended. The sole purpose of the United States government is a form of collectivism that is supposed to protect the rights of each individual:…
- 71.
A single-payer healthcare system would be better than the current one
For
- duly noted
- the right single payer system would be a better economic system than we have now we spend more per capita, and get less health care results back... than any other country in the world: http://cthealth.server101.com... -we spend 17% of our GDP on healthcare, while single payer…
Against
- Single Payer healthcare is not an economic system. Therefore, it cannot be a better economic system than what we have now as it is not an economic system.
- I accept the challenge
- 72.
Using artificial body parts in medical training dehumanizes medical practice
For
- If I were to cry about it would I then be making the issue more human in the process.
- As a design student it is not really and issue that affects me (therefore I am already over it), more than something that would have been interesting to argue with someone over the age of 5.
Against
- cry about it
- Get over it
- 73.
Private sector involvement is necessary to improve healthcare in Africa
For
- Alleviating rural-urban disparities
- Funding solutions to combat disease
Against
- Unregulated health-care
- Ideas and interests in a neoliberal model
- 74.
Instagram use causes depression in young people
For
- You say "personal photos or your life are a strong way to connect with your audience" but are you really showing what your life is like? I bet you have had a couple bad hair days, some times when you were unhappy or cried a lot but I bet you didn"t post that, and that"s the…
- I am new to this but I think Instagram causes depression.
Against
- yest again, Nothing to argue with.
- I really don't have anything to say since they have forfeited the round
- 75.
Modern government policies have made humans physically weaker
For
- ok darwins theory of natural selection shows that organisms that are best equiped to survive will. with government they destroy threats aganst the weakest. such as we have vacciens for the flu. say two ppl get the flu and one dies well ththe stronger one lived but with a…
- With a government there are rules and consequences and since these rules protect everyone this takes out the survival of the fittest saying which mean that the stron will prevail. But with laws and consequences the weak make it through societ reroducing more weak people. by…
Against
- Extend arguments. I thought as much. My opponent has failed to negate my arguments. My arguments stand. Thank you.
- Darwin's theory of natural selection also states that I'm going to win this debate because my arguments are longer than yours. Before I tear down your arguments, I will again point out that you have provided a whopping total of 0 sources of evidence. Therefore, you have nothing…
- 76.
The United States can realistically achieve universal free healthcare
For
- First off, how is it possible for health-care to have no cost? The money to pay for all of these expenses must come from somewhere. In an Ideal World where every person has some level of concern for their neighbor, yes, it is possibly for HealthCare to be free. But in our…
Against
- Extend what I have said.
- I actually see no need to further my case. My opponent says what I am advocating. The resolution is negated. Thank you.
- 77.
LSD should be legalized with restrictions
For
- Thank you. REBUTTAL 1: Alcohol is indeed legal, cheap, and accessible. However, it is the effects that make a date rape drug a date rape drug. Let's compare a few relevant effects of alcohol and LSD. Alcohol: Sleepiness Slurred speech Relaxation Loss of consciousness LSD:…
- Thank you for your well-thought-out rebuttals. I will rebut my opponent's contention and defend mine. REBUTTAL 1: My opponent makes the argument that LSD is often used as a date rape drug. Although it could, in theory, be used as a date rape drug, it is not the (for lack of a…
Against
- Lets now examine some of adversaries claims. Rebuttal 1He compares the side effects of alcohol and LSD. As I have already claimed alcohol can be used a date rape drug, but is no where near convenient as LSD to use. As i have also shown and which he failed to contest(straw…
- Let us take a look at some of my adversaries contentions and rebuttals.Rebuttal 1"My opponent makes the argument that LSD is often used as a date rape drug. Although it could, in theory, be used as a date rape drug, it is not the (for lack of a better word) ideal drug for the…
- 78.
California should adopt New York's sugary drink ban
For
- Definitions: 1. Adopt:Take up or start to use or follow. 2. Sugary drinks: 16 ounce (or more) cups or bottles of sugary sodas or other beverages Points (leaving out refutations) 1. Obesity in California is a growing epidemic, and studies prove that there is a direct correlation…
Against
- Well, this is too bad.
- Well, this is awkward. Vote con. Imnota please respond.
- 79.
Functioning labels should not be used to describe autistic people
For
- 1. Preponderance of evidence indicates that CDD is distinct from ASD.In approximately 1/3 of ASD patients, the regression of language is observed between 18-24 months of age with the appearance of autistic behavior. In childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), autistic…
- 1. The DSM V does not use the terms "high functioning" and "low functioning". They use level 1, 2 and 3These terms are not the same. They have different connotations. I will point out problems with previous DSM diagnosis.CDD is a disorder of its own and not a part of the autism…
Against
- The Con should win this debate for several reasons.1: The Pro has not provided adequate evidence to support her claims, Con evidence outweighsThroughout the round the Pro has referred to blogs, comment sections, youtube videos and Vlogs. Only in the final round did she provide…
- Responses to Round 2First ArgumentAccording to Mayo Clinic "Childhood disintegrative disorder is part of a larger category called autism spectrum disorder." http://www.mayoclinic.org...And aspergers is a part of the autism spectrum. Refer to my source from the Autism Society,…
- 80.
The United States should establish universal healthcare
For
- "Outside of oratory or public debate (such as this one) in which you propose for the government to provide universal healthcare, what actions do you take in your life toward helping the needy receive medical assistance?" As a high school Junior there is very little I can do at…
- I affirm the resolution that the United States ought to establish Universal Healthcare. This will be a values based debate there for my value [premise] for the round is societal welfare. Because when promoting and allowing Universal healtcare to a population it allows people to…
Against
- I'll let my opponent to respond to my last round, as his profile shows that he's signed on recently. Consider R3 as nonexistent.
- I negate, that "The United States Ought to Establish a Universal Healthcare." I will first go over definitions, then value, the VC, my case, and then the line-by-line. I might extend my case in my next round, depending on how PRO answers my ending question. He'd still have R4…
- 81.
Cigarettes and cigars should be banned from sale
For
- Cigars and Cigarettes should be stopped being sold, because it can kill and/or give them fatal illnesses (e.g. cancer). I don't get why people still sell them. If people are still smoking, and they suddenly get stopped from being sold, they don't know where on earth to get them…
- I knew that Con would say something about the people who produce these products. The people who produce cigarettes should be found another job closest to their wages. Just like any other job. If their workplace closes down, and they don't relocate, they get another job.
Against
- Pro thinks that he has the right of stopping smokers from giving themselves a slow death while having pleasure. I ask why? Who made good health manadatory? Who gave him the right to decide what other people do in their lives? And who said that we should live long lives? Pro's…
- Pro has not offered us one good argument why his proposition should be taken seriously, and clearly indicated in the previous rounds that such a measure should be implemented because "he thinks this should be the case. "I thought he was approaching this from the underlying…
- 82.
Health care should not be free for children or adults
For
- Blessed-Cheese-Maker (nice name by the way) I commend your interpretation of the situation as it is a valid position and demonstrates a comprehension of the facts. However, your conclusion still begs the question, should the government pay for people who make 60,000 a year to…
- Perhaps you read too much into my suggestion that the Gov't should not be providing health care to any child whose parents are capable of getting a job. What was meant by that comment was that unless a child's parents are disabled and incapable of earning an income then I…
Against
- Dr Harvey, thank you for your well positions arguments and for the opportunity to address each, this debate has been informative and engaging. Let me start off by clearly defining my position to the initial question. YES, the government (you, I and all productive tax payers)…
- Interesting points all.... Lets begin with your contention that children should not qualify for S-Chip unless their parents are incapable of working.(thats Medicaid, not SChip) The result of that position of course is children will not receive adequate health care. Doctor's…
- 83.
The United States should ban tobacco
For
- Good luck to my opponent!
Against
- DO NOT VOTE. thanks
- Well* I *hate* autocorrect.
- 84.
Governments should not require labels on GMO foods
For
- Thank you for the acceptance stef16. It has come to my notice that a commenter was confused as to my late reply. As this is my fist debate, I am sorry if I have misunderstood the typical procedures of this website. However, I did state that there would be a time limit of 72…
- Would prefer a beginner debater, since this is my first time. The burden of proof will reside on me. Note that this is under politics, so this debate will focus on political arguments supporting or opposing GMO labeling of food products. Most discussions of health benefits or…
Against
- I accept the challenge. I am a beginner debater as I only joined yesterday so don't worry. I am arguing that the government should require GMO labelling for food products
- 85.
Communicable diseases should be mandatorily reported
For
- My opponent makes no consistent argument in the one round in which he participated after my initial response to his first argument.As such, you should vote for my opponent, and not me.
- round forfeited by opponent.
Against
- people with communicable diseases can be discriminated by others, it should be there choice to choose whether they should keep it to themselves or tell someone. Yes, it should be reported for other peoples safety but they need to save themselves from others bullying, harassing,…
- why should people go against reporting communicable diseases? do people have rights to keep communicable diseases to themselves or let warn people about it? do people have rights for their own health privacy?
- 86.
The minimum smoking age in the UK should be lowered to 16
For
- The hubbub about passive smoking is another of the Nanny state's big lies. Numerous studies confirm this. There is no medical connection between secondhand smoke and disease.
Against
- As your forfeited the last round, I will give you a few facts to conclude my debate. 1. A single cigarette contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. 2. About 69% of smokers want to quit completely. 3. Exposure to Secondhand smoke causes nearly 50,000…
- What numerous studies? You have no proof that "numerous studies" have been put to the cause. Smoke is harmful, second hand smoking is realising smoke. And also real studies say that it's harmful: http://www.webmd.boots.com... 18 is an age when you can get a lot of privileges…
- 87.
Cell phone radiation is safe for humans
For
- Your whole entire argument on round 3 is based of that article. I'll be telling you why it's not enough information to support your claim. "I derived this information from a reliable website." Just saying that doesn't make it reliable. You have to look on more than one site,…
- That is like trying to overdose on weed. It will take around 100,000 puffs in less than a half an hour to be dangerous. The amounts are so small, no effects really is going to be done. I recieved this from an official website. "The only consistently recognized biological effect…
Against
- (OK so now this is the fourth and final debating round, first of all good luck to my opponent, you have done really well and your information has been really well researched. :) Now I will move away from the whole 'cancer and tumour' subheading as we have discussed that a bit…
- Yes, scientists might say that the radio frequency the user receives is not enough to cause any harm to them, but the average person uses their mobile phone for more than 5 hours per day. Think about how much radio frequency your body absorbs during those 5 hours! But it's not…
- 88.
Teenagers should be able to get birth control without parental consent
For
- Condoms are not always the best protection method. Condoms can break. Women need to use birth control to guarantee that pregnancy will not occur. Using a condom alone is more risky than using birth control alone. Should parents know whats going on with their children? Yes. But…
- Im sorry for the forfeit. Teenagers are going to have sex. They are NOT going to tell their parents, and while people say they should, they wont. So you're going to let them have a child instead of giving them birth control? Sure its expensive, but so is diapers, food, and…
Against
- Birth Control is extremely hard to manage, and should not be seen as this fool proof way of stopping teen pregnancy. Without a parent to help them, chances are a teenage girl will improperly administer it, especially if she is trying to keep it secret from her parents. No one…
- They should not because the pills are very expensive and a teenager needs a parents help in this important ordeal.
- 89.
Psychiatry is a hoax and should be abolished
For
- I stated that psychiatry itself is a not a hoax. My opponents resolution was "Is psychiatry (as practiced today) a hoax, and should it be abolished as a medical specialty?" Psychiatry today has underwent certain changes that not only change the way it should be ran, but also…
- Since My opponent did not message me to oppose my use of the same case, I will then proceed with the same case I used in our previous debate. My Case ++++++++++++|) ==================D While psychiatry might be looked upon with awe and revere for whatever work it may do, the…
Against
- Hm, interesting refutation. How does that make you feel? Better yet, what was your early relationship like with your mother?
- My opponent states: "Psychiatry itself is not a hoax." And: "Psychiatry should not be abolished[,] as it has a place in our society." Whether or not the other complaints of the opponent are sound or not, my resolution stands, and my stance on the matter at hand prevails. Thank…
- 90.
Tobacco and alcohol should be restricted in films and advertising
For
- come on man.. kids under the age of 15 is not mature as you think...how could a small kid gather info from other places.. like when travelling...they have their parents controlling them but i hvanet seen many parents looking cartoons with their children to check weather its…
- ohh well!! you know that the modern cartoons do show these stuff. do you think that the children will resist watching cartoons...no they won't .... come on .. i am 100% sure that banning these pathetic advertisements in children movies and cartoons will do greater good to the…
Against
- They should learn from their own experiences
- I mean it would be fine..... but it really doesn't do anything. People can still get the . Info from other places. The for your time it was fun.
- 91.
US health care provides poor value for its cost
For
- 1-"For something to be "worthless," it has to be worth nothing, zero, zilch." "More importantly, even if something is "in the negative," it can still be worth something." I don't understand, you did say this, I did not put this in your mouth, you said this yourself. As for…
- My opponent believes that, even though it doesnt serve a lot of people, it still has a positive effect on a "few" people. Well that is obvious, but do we want a system that does not help at least half the people of the US? We obviously need a better system, and my opponent can…
Against
- 1 - Nope, look at what happens when companies go bankrupt. They still have assets, they just have to sell them on the cheap. 2 - Meh. 3 - But some people can use the current system so it's not worthless. *** It's worth at least five dollars because the offer is on the table.…
- "We obviously need a better system, and my opponent can not deny that." Yes, but the current system is not worthless. 1 - I don't believe that something that is worthless has worth. But I didn't call it worthless, you did. It's only a contradiction when you put words in my…
- 92.
Individuals rather than society should be blamed for obesity
For
- Point 1: Fast restaurants do not have a warning label. Sub A: They know the danger involved and as smoke and drink companies they will be label properly the food. A normal person do not know the process and the ingredients. Sub B: The proper behavior of companies will be to…
- point 3: Fast food restaurants promote unhealthy and huge meals. Sub A: As the health care costs of treating obesity-related illnesses mount, some are looking to place the blame for increasing obesity rates on the purveyors of fast food. Facing fierce competition for customer…
Against
- You are correct in saying that fast food companies do not have a warning label, However it is also true that it is common knowledge that fast food makes you unhealthy. The reason smokes and drinks have warnings is due to the fact they have drugs in them and are by law required…
- Although the fast food companies are providing the food, they do not promote it as being healthy their is and do not intend for it to be eaten regularly. McDonalds is a burger chain and hence sells burgers, people go to McDonalds to eat burgers, if people wanted salads they…
- 93.
Not all cancer is caused by DNA damage
For
- This is my first debate so I thought I'd try a simple topic and turn everyones understanding of cancer on its head :) Anyone game for a response to defend the current status quo? I propose that the 'genetic' theory of cancer is incorrect, that DNA is not the cause of any cancer…
- As Trarc has not responded in the last round I will keep this short and include two final and compelling points that further support my claim. I invite Trarc to conclude and attempt to refute my evidence in the last round, but won't accept new evidence that defends his/her…
Against
- First, Curious78 seems to imply that only nDNA is relevant in this debate. The prompt clearly states that the question is whether DNA causes cancer. Both mDNA (AKA mtDNA) and nDNA are DNA, and thus both are relevant. Curious78 erroneously says, "Note that Trarc refused to use…
- I had misunderstood Curious87's original argument. It seems much of his argument (but perhaps not all) is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how DNA functions in a cell. I'll note I've only cited one source here because these claims should be common knowledge (for many,…
- 94.
Parents who allow severe childhood obesity commit child neglect
For
- Firstly, just to be clear, I am not a hateful person and I don't have anything against any of the type of people I listed in my opening paragraph. For example, I am very fond of my fine neighbor, Mr. Leroy MacAroon, who is a retarded, alcoholic, Ogoun-worshipping,…
- * Crack-whores; * Alcoholics; * Former terrorists; * Race-hate preachers / Zionists rabbis; * Arms dealers; * Bitch-slapping pimps; * Head-hunting savages from Papua New Guinea; * Urine-soaked tramps; * Mormons / Jehovah's Witnesses; * Michael Jackson fanatics; *…
Against
- My opponent still loves to blame the parents on this topic, which I asked in my previous argument. Why do health nuts always find ways to blame a parent? and not ask themselves who fault is it really when a person becomes overweight? it there own fault, just like adults, or the…
- RE: 1st Paragraph Introduction: You forgot to mention in your list, hateful people, judgemental people, some characteristics you share; however society still will allow people like you to have children. That list, and what I have said is and was not the issue we are debating…
- 95.
All Americans should be required to buy private health insurance
For
- I understand my "plan" would require a lot of cooperation from the insurance companies in order to bring the uninsured on board. The Conservatives always preach self reliance. Having your own health insurance is a great example of self reliance. Unfortunately, you'll never get…
- Obviously, the insurance industry would love to have the same captive audience that it enjoys with mandatory auto insurance. Truth be told, I don't care for these nanny laws. Yes this is just speculation, but what I would envision is the government negotiating with the…
Against
- Let me first start by thanking you for the opportunity to debate this critical issue. As far as the debate goes, all I know at this point is that you support mandatory health insurance for every man, woman, and child. I have to assume that you support an unfunded mandate for…
- In your opening argument you eluded to young adults (18-24) making up the largest percentage of those without health insurance. I would argue that many within that age bracket CHOOSE not to have health insurance because many people ages 18-24 have no health problems that need…
- 96.
Fast food chains should disclose use of GMO ingredients
For
- It is our right to know what we are consuming. The fact that in 80% of foods contain GMOs and there is no labeling is wrong. When a food contains allergens such as gluten or dairy it is labeled. That is simply how it is. These foods are labeled because some people choose not to…
- I would just like to remind Con that we are not arguing the severity of GMOs, but whether when companies are using them they are letting the public know. In the brief time that GMOs have been around there have been many controversies regarding the health and safety of the…
Against
- You continue to claim that GMOs are unsafe ("deadly" even) and therefore should be labeled. First you cited NonGMOProject.org, an anti-GMO org that has no scientific credibility. Now you are citing PubMed, which is a search engine. Saying "according to PubMed..." is like saying…
- Of course NonGMOProject say that; spreading fear of GM crops is their job. They are not a scientific organisation. If that's where you go for information on this topic, then it's not surprising that your views are so discordant with the empirical evidence and scientific…
- 97.
The United States should switch to a universal healthcare system
For
- I do agree that your proposed improvements have some merit, but I believe that your views on a government system are a little too cynical. You claim that a government system is worse than a monopoly, but this is not really the case. I mean, sure, it could happen, but the…
- There are many reasons for the United States to move to a single-payer Universal healthcare system. Among these reasons are things like the fact that the United States is ranked 37th in the world for healthcare. Another one of these reasons is that the average lifespan of an…
Against
- We of course have the difficulty now of a two-round debate. Anyways, I'll take it point by point. You comment: >I believe that your views on a government system are a little too cynical. It comes from having worked for the government and from witnessing how things are done. To…
- Now, it's just too easy for someone to make an opponent of Federal Health Care into a bad guy and to be alarmed at the idea someone could be against it. But there is more to compassion than mere provision, and there are more consequences to Federalizing healthcare than the…
- 98.
Smoking on public property should be illegal in the US
For
- The evidence came from a study from the US Surgeon General's Report, which was cited in my previous argument. Obviously the less smoke you breathe in the less of an effect it willl have, but Con asserts that there is a safe amount that can be taken it. Con asserts that one will…
- Premise: The United States Declaration of Independence declares "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" as "unalienable Rights". (1) Allowing smoking in public places violates one's right to life, while not harming the smoker's liberty. Constructive: There is wide…
Against
- RE: "Con asserts that one will never be exposed to the amount of smoke to do enough damage." This was not asserted. The assertion was that "the amount of second hand smoke encountered on public properties and public easements such as sidewalks, parking lots for government…
- This proposal is unreasonably restrictive, and foe's central argument in support of this proposal is based on an inaccurate factual assertion. First, foe supports the proposal by arguing that the safety of the public is jeopardized by second hand smoke on public property. Foe's…
- 99.
We should ban smoking in public places
For
- I believe that we should ban smoking in public places. Firstly,its a bad influence on our children.Young children will see people smoking and start thinking its okay or that its "cool" to smoke.Once they think its all right,they will start smoking. Secondly when people walk…
Against
- I'd suggest that the burden of proof was not yet let by PRO...
- Oh well, tis a shame.
- 100.
Not all psychopaths and sociopaths are killers
For
- So if your saying people who kill animals are Killers then i guess Farmers are Killers and should be arrested and made documentaries upon for the obligation to Kill animals to eat????? https://nodogaboutit.wordpress.com... If you have Relatives in a Rural area and you go Visit…
- Haha i feel like you are no longer an Adversary but you are still Debating which is fine, what i meant was "Not all Psychopaths and Sociopaths are Killers" The debate title, the non-outrageous notorious psychopaths don't Kill humans but Kill animals which i don't understand i…
Against
- Ed Gien confessed to the murder of two local women. he was indeed a killer, and a really weird one at that. Which is why he is so notorious. And as I have said killing animals makes you technically a killer.
- Well first off I apologize if it seemed as though I was trying to insult you I simply had a difficult time reading it. And you have expressed your argument in a much more intellectual way that is also more importantly easy to read. I question whether or not you are what you say…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?