Discussly

Ethics Debate Topics for Students — page 3

451 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

StudentsDebatePage 3 of 10
  1. 101.

    Veganism is a morally superior choice to eating meat

    For

    • During the course of the debate, I have stressed on just one point- because that is the core of the argument, killing animals is morally wrong. I established a link between being a non vegetarianism and killing animals, stating that being a non vegetarian is wrong because it…
    • Rebuttals://While this is a true statement, it is not true for all people…it would be an exceptable way to have meat without supporting the meat industry.//This still does not make it all right. Yes, in these cases killing does not support the meat industry, it still leads to…

    Against

    • My opponent has spent this entire debate trying to prove that killing is morally wrong no mater what. The problem is that killing is often morally right. The definition provided by my opponent for morals is: Of or concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human…
    • The first argument was clearly stating that eating meat was wrong because a) it supported the meat industry, and b) it led to the death of animals. I pointed out that the consumption of meat does not have to support the meat industry. Therefore, the only argument provided as…
  2. 102.

    Animals that attack humans should be put down

    For

    • Tip for my opponent don't make such large debates if there is an off chance you will not finish them.
    • I'm guessing my opponent is longer participating in the debate so I'll just wait to finish.

    Against

    • I don know if there is a whole legislation on the matter or anything... I'm going of observation from Australian media. Recently, tonight actually, I saw on the news of two women who were jogging on Fraser Island and two dingo's chased them and bit them on the ankles except one…
    • Okay, so I'm not too sure about other countries but here in Australia there seems to be a belief that if you are attacked by a wild animal, trackers will attempt to hunt the animal down and terminate it. For example; if you enter the ocean and the slight chance you get attacked…
  3. 103.

    Vegetarianism is morally wrong

    For

    • Thankyou for your reply. Ok...Firstly,You said why should we stoop down to their level. I would like to point out that it is not my oppinion that it is to lower yourself to eat animals and consider it the same as eating any plant or other kind of food. I understand your point…
    • OK, thankyou for letting me go first. I have a few main points I'd like to adress: 1. Animals eat each other and the idea that we should care for animals by removing a big chunk in our diet is quite a strange concept. 2. I am not talking about eating endangered species like…

    Against

    • Well thank you for your reply FirstlyAnimals are considered sentient beings that are aware of their surroundings and care what happens to them.[1] This means they also actively try to survive, find food, etc. Therefore animals do care what happens to them seeing that they are…
    • RebuttalsRebuttal 1: Why should the actions of animals be mimicked by humans? My opponent brings up the point that animals eat other animals so I have to assume he's claiming that since it's normal for animals to eat other animals, then it is therefore okay for humans to eat…
  4. 104.

    Farm animals are better off on free-range farms than in nature

    For

    • Not really, No. You can argue that these animals would've preferred a chance at living in nature. You can argue that the way they die (be it by predator, Starvation, Or disease) in nature is preferential to their helpless slaughtering. You can argue that their inability to…
    • This debate isn't about what feels right or wrong but rather, It asks us, The debaters to place ourselves in the shoes of these animals, Regardless of how feasible that is to do, And attempt to make a preference decision for these animals with regards to what is preferable,…

    Against

    • Well these are domesticated animals are they not? They can't survive in nature so the point is rather moot no?
    • Starvation is the worst death imaginable worse than a human execution
  5. 105.

    Factory farming should be banned

    For

    • OBVIOUSLY MY OPPONENT HAD NOT FULLY READ THROUGH MY DEBATE, when i made the statement 'however this doesn't mean we have to use traditional methods of farming' i followed with FACTORY FARMS TODAY SHOULD BE BANNED BUT ADAPTED FOR FUTURE USE' I hope the readers will keep this in…
    • To your earlier claims. There is such a thing as sexual deviance and abuse against animals in factory farming, the peta have seen this, and posted it http://www.peta.org... . They have been their on multiple occasions in different places and have seen this and witnessed the…

    Against

    • I have to say that I am insulted by my opponents presumptuous and radical claims that state that I did not read his arguments, a claim that doesn't even make sense considering I have addressed all of his points. My opponent tries to cover his mistake of trying to switch the…
    • In response to your first paragraph:1) PETA is clearly a biased source and is known for radical and fabricated claims, if you could provide a neutral source such as a news article or report I will take this claim as true. PETA is the group that created a graphic flash game of a…
  6. 106.

    People should actively work to improve the world

    For

    • Dovewing5, with no offense directed toward you, this is where I answer that question.My claim at the beginning of this debate was: If a person wants to live in a good world, he should ACTIVELY do things to make the world better.Dovewing5 exlaimed: "In my opinion, this implies…
    • Dovewing5, you offer some excellent perspectives.If some of your perspectives are right, then human beings, in certain ways, really can't get along, and pain and social discord is here to stay.Dovewing5 says: "Also, you talk about physical retaliations and aggressive behavior.…

    Against

    • No offence taken, Juan_Pablo."This statement is very logical and answers itself. People that don't go out of their way to make the world better, to push for fairness, justice, universal healthcare and education, people that don't contribute to acts of charity, who aren't…
    • Ah, some great arguments. Unfortunately, I fear we are getting off-topic. My own fault, I believe, for leading us in this direction. Let me quote the question for us: "If a person wants to live in a good world, he should ACTIVELY do things to make the world better." In my…
  7. 107.

    Eating meat should be illegal

    For

    • Waiting
    • I await my opponent's arguments.

    Against

    • This debate is about how eating meat should be illegal. I think that eating meat is a good thing and also good for you. The FDA stated that eating meat is good for the body and its developments. They also stated that meat helps produces good muscle health.
  8. 108.

    Veganism is not morally better than eating meat

    For

    • I established my position in the first round that people who choose to be vegans for their own health reasons should do so nor did I state that they should be "persecuted" or shouldn't be allowed to choose to be vegans. I simply think that the moral reasons for eating veganism…
    • Vegans choose the lifestyle to refrain from eating meat products such as meat, eggs, fish, and milk for many moral, health, and environmental reasons, I believe, in all honesty, that unless being a vegan is a personal dietary choice made to suit your own health needs, veganism…

    Against

    • I do not think that i strayed from the topic. What i stated was about the fact that Veganism is better than eating meat for the people that choose to be Vegans. Which is indeed apart of the topic that my opponent proposed. I do not think that my opponent understands what i am…
    • To start off i would like to point out that I am not a vegan, nor do I agree with them. However, i do believe that the people that choose to be vegans should not be persecuted by others. Also, the resolution that my opponent proposed states that "Veganism is not better than…
  9. 109.

    Fat-shaming women can be morally acceptable

    For

    • There is a saying; people in greenhouses shouldn't throw rocks
    • I'll make a start. If no-one shamed fat women then more women would, because of feminists and their "fat is beautiful" (fat acceptance) movements, believe that men actually find fat bodies attractive.This would lead to much more women having health problems. Most men are…

    Against

    • I accept and will be debating that fat shamin women is not ok and that it is cyber bullying.
  10. 110.

    Killing one innocent person to save several is morally permissible

    For

    • I apologize, but due to time constraints placed upon me by my actual debating, I cannot continue this round. I regret doing so, but I will forfeit this debate.
    • Okay, so I'm a novice LD debater and after finishing debating this topic, I decided to try it out on here. Here I go! It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of more innocent people. First I offer the following definitions: Morally permissible is…

    Against

    • Unfortunate indeed as I as looking forward to reading my opponent's reply.
    • My opponent's resolution is that it is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of more innocent people. She supports that by contending that every life is equal in value and that therefore three lives (as an example) are worth more than one. She…
  11. 111.

    The seven deadly sins are essential in moderation

    For

    • I said not in excess so your point about 'too much annoyance' being bad is true. You need strength of anger to push others out of your way. If peopel want to step on your toes to rise the top of the corporation you work in, you mst be ready to rip their fott off your toes and…
    • For goodness' sake I love how you fail to attack the other six. fine.Let me once and for all destroy you.Anger is a strong feeling of annoyance, displeasure, or hostility http://oxforddictionaries.com... WIthout this you would never be annoyed at enyone whether it be an…

    Against

    • I said not in excess so your point about 'too much annoyance' being bad is true. " My opponent has conceded this point. "If peopel want to step on your toes to rise the top of the corporation you work in, you mst be ready to rip their fott off your toes and step on theirs. " I…
    • My opponent has defined Anger as a strong feeling of annoyance displeasure or hostility. He has also made the following assertions "WIthout this you would never be annoyed at enyone. .. " This is untrue, you do not require a "strong feeling" of something to still have that…
  12. 112.

    It is immoral not to extend rights to animals

    For

    • I affirm. Definitions:Prefer my definition of immoral because it isn't circular. My opponent defines immoral as "something which is not moral". How do we define morality? Instead, I define "immoral" to be conforming to standards of bad behavior. Thus, wasting money, assaulting…
    • I affirm.For the definitional debate, my opponent defines "immoral" on a foundation of moral principles, but he/she does not actually DEFINE morality. Thus, prefer my definition that "immoral" means conforming to standards of bad behavior in ANY way, shape, or form.It looks…

    Against

    • Definitions: I prefer my definition of immoral because it is a term which is negatively defined – which is different than being circularly defined. Anoxia means 'without oxygen'. Asexual means 'without sex'. Immaculate means 'without blemishes'. Immaterial means 'not material'.…
    • Definitions: Immoral: Immoral is a word that is negatively defined; it is something which is not moral. I find this to be the only definition which is acceptable. If 'bad behavior' is defined in such a way that it refers to a breach of morality than I would agree with my…
  13. 113.

    Eating meat endorses cruelty

    For

    • Bah, always forget something. Hunting is cruel for several reasons. First and foremost humans don't need to eat meat to survive. There are plenty of high protein vegan foods. B-12 can be gained from supplements and from raw organic fruit and veggies. Second, the animal doesn't…
    • First, definition of cruel and pain, since cruelty references cruel. Cruel " 1. willfully or knowingly causing pain or distress to others." "3. causing or marked by great pain or distress: a cruel remark; a cruel affliction. 4. rigid; stern; strict; unrelentingly severe. " [5].…

    Against

    • 1. Needing meat to survive has nothing to do with whether it is cruel.2. Cecil the Lion is a stiatistical minority. Trophy hunting is out of reach as far as cost goes for average americans. Cecil's hunt cost $55,000. . http://www.latimes.com... $55,000 for 1 lion vs $50 for 12…
    • Pro gives a very good case as to why factory farm raised meat is cruel. However, the subject is not whether factory farming is cruel. It is "Eating meat endorses cruelty". To address this, I will contend my position mainly with hunting. Hunting allows an animal to live in it's…
  14. 114.

    The sale of fur should be banned

    For

    • I extend my arguments.
    • I came up with a good analogy for the economy: slavery. Slavery was an essential part of the economy, but it was horrific and inhumane, like the fur trade, and was banned even though the economy suffered a bit.On the subject of environment, fur isn't so great either. The waste…

    Against

    • I oppose. You mentioned that faux fur is almost as warm as real fur. Faux fur is derived from non-renewable sources that are petroleum based. Scientists have predicted a dire situation fifty years from now. If we extract more of this finite source, future generations will be at…
    • The sale of fur has many benefits that are helpful to the economy. If we shut down the fur-trade, a whole trading sector will collapse and may be the cause of a later Global Financial Crisis. 15 billion dollars are spent each year in the fur trade industry and if we ban the…
  15. 115.

    Zoos and aquariums should not keep animals in captivity

    For

    • Extend arguments.
    • Extend arguments.

    Against

    • * Should animals be kept in zoos and aquariums? My opionion: No animals should not be kept in zoos or aquariums. My reasons why:: I believe that zoos are a somewhat bad place for animals. Reasons why: Animals are built for the real outdoors and to find food and shelter in their…
  16. 116.

    A just society should recognize the rights of animals

    For

    • wat the
    • k lts do some research

    Against

    • I will be negating the resolution, but I am searching for a pro to begin the debate. If you are interested, accept the challenge and begin with your arguments. Round structure: 1. Pro opening argument. 2. Con opening argument and pro defense. 3. Con defense and closing…
  17. 117.

    Divorce is morally acceptable

    For

    • I will now refute my opponent's claims "1. Because it is breaking marriage vows..."'til death do us part!" When someone says their wedding vows, they are making a lifetime commitment, a promise." No Scripture supports that as a biblical commandment, in fact Deut. 24 conflicts…
    • Matt. 19:3-10 "3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason? Havent you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator "made them male and female," 5 and said, "For this reason a man will leave…

    Against

    • I believe you have actually changed my view on this topic. So I guess you have won this debate.
    • The Bible gives two clear grounds for divorce: One, sexual immorality, Matthew 5:32; 19:9, and Two, abandonment by an unbeliever, 1 Corinthians 7:15. Even in these two situations, divorce is not required or even encouraged. The most that can be said is that sexual immorality…
  18. 118.

    Hitting a woman is never justified

    For

    • And this brings an end to the debate. I have stated my reasoning, and I have nothing to refute from our silent instigator. Duncan.
    • Speeding up the debate.

    Against

    • I think it is never okay to hit a woman! The average man is much stronger than the average woman. Hitting a woman can easily knock her off of her feet, but if a woman hits a man it usually has barely any affect on the male. I think that under no circumstances is it okay to hit…
  19. 119.

    Countries should ban the consumption of dog meat

    For

    • (I will present to him of my logical sounding and rational arguments rather than those that incorporate personal preferences, such as personal opinions. ) I hope you will judge fairly, and will base your judgement based on our arguments, not because of your, or others, opinions.
    • I think we should ban the consumption of dog meat in countries that have citizens consume dog meat. There are about 11 countries around the world that allow the consumption of dog meat. Compared to the rest of the world, they are *outnumbered*. Con stating that "We should…

    Against

    • Hello. This is a debate between me and my friend. This particular debate is about consumption of dog meat within China and whether or not it should happen. I am for Con, meaning, I am against the particular statement My friend will be for Pro, promoting the statement. There are…
    • Blank.
  20. 120.

    Non-human animals should have legal rights

    For

    • I am sorry about the previous round, I had an after school activity and my bus schedules were messed up so by the time I got home, it was too late :(. But i provided refutation for both of Con's rebuttals to make up for my previous round. I wll flow through the organization my…
    • "Heaven is by favor; it were by merit your dog would go in and you would stay out. Of all the creatures ever made, man is the most detestable. Of the entire brood, he is the only one. . . that possesses malice. He is the only creature that inflicts pain for sport, knowing it to…

    Against

    • Hi ladies and gentlemanWelcome to the last round of this debate,Before I start my case I would like to present few flaws with opponents small case.My opponent has mentioned in all his contentions that :- "A just society that recognized the rights and values of its members is…
    • If they (animals) were recognized individual than, Why do we still have animal activists equivalent to terrorist? They donot even value the more important life (human life) Contention 1 - It is perfectly natural to use animals for our own nutrition and pleasure – in the wild…
  21. 121.

    Advocating vegetarianism is not a solution to slaughterhouse cruelty

    For

    • I'll give you another few days to respond to my previous comments, and it'll be like a 2-round debate!
    • I'll start with the most direct counter that you had to my argument. Theoretically, if enough people stopped eating pork, corporate pork producers would feel the financial effects, and perhaps alter their practices to try to win back the customers who decided to boycott because…

    Against

    • hello Kevin. as a vegetarian, i will happily take up the arguments of my own cause. I understand your confusion. I agree that tougher standards need to be pushed for in animal slaughtering - that would be a good first step. But first, I want to establish why someone ought to be…
  22. 122.

    Animals should not be given legal protective rights

    For

    • On my opponent's case1. I fully respect the majority rule in a democratic society. The issue here is if we were going to allow majority rule(of the population, not voters here) to be the deciding factor in a debate, then a person would only need a public poll from Gallup to win…
    • On my opponent's case1. This is an ad populum fallacy. Because people support it does not mean it is desirable. We are debating the validity of animal rights, not democracy.3. People who participate in animal cruelty may very well be exhibiting psychological issues. However,…

    Against

    • 1. This is an ad populum fallacy. Because people support it does not mean it is desirable. We are debating the validity of animal rights, not democracy. I do not believe that ad populum can be relevant to democratic demands – which must be popular by definition. At times when…
    • I am impressed by the surprisingly well-presented case that my partner has made, and must admit that it has exceeded my expectations. Congratulations on this. Unfortunately, once we peel back the impressive verbiage, the arguments themselves do not do justice to his eloquence…
  23. 123.

    Animal experimentation is morally wrong

    For

    • The topic and the arguments for and against is actually pretty self-explanatory. I've been thinking about this, and I've come to the conclusion that both sides of this debate have valid points that will make this debate very much enjoyable. I am not tolerant of any sort of…
    • I will now proceed to make my final statements in this last round. While my opponent has repeatedly tried to dismiss my arguments and counter arguments, I will now summarize my points to show that it is actually he who has misunderstood my points and arguments, not me. The…

    Against

    • It seems that we have very different views, but I've appreciated his arguments greatly. It's been a very intriguing debate and I've greatly appreciated the opportunity to have it. With that, I'll launch into some crystallization and concluding statements. First and foremost,…
    • Thanks to Pro for his arguments this round, and I'm going to launch straight into this. Pro is fundamentally misunderstanding my arguments, which is the entire reason he sees contradictions. From the outset, no, I did not agree that the utility of animal experimentation is…
  24. 124.

    Government-provided policing is morally wrong

    For

    • Some say the most important attributes of job in law enforcement are the person's integrity and moral behavior. In order to be a law enforcement officer, individuals must demonstrate a life lived morally within certain criteria. However, what about the profession as a whole as…
    • R1: Acceptance R2: Argument R3: Rebuttal R4: Closing Remarks(only limited new argument if absolutely necessary) I am taking that position that modern policing that is, all protection, security and law enforcement currently provided by governments is immoral. I will try to argue…

    Against

    • In this argument I will be using this as the definition of morality: principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior.My BoP is to prove that Policing, Law Enforcement, and Security Services are moral.C1: Law EnforcementTo understand this…
    • I accept, good luck.
  25. 125.

    PETA is a good organization

    For

    • Alright, I would just like to mention to any viewers of this debate that my opponent's entire final argument should be discredited because of brand new information and examples. It is unfair to the Pro if new examples and information is brought up at the conclusion of the…
    • Thank you for your compliment of being a worthier opponent and I hope that you see that characteristic in this speech. First of all, you never provided a definition of PETA being People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals until your second speech, thus leaving that up to me.…

    Against

    • Because you did provide a definition, i will argue all of your points. Your point 1)People eating tasty animals has not supported terrorism. Well, if we look at past members of the online facebook account, Chris McCourghy, a member of your PETA, sent around 50 dollars to the…
    • Hello my worthier opponent, To start off with your definition conflict, the definition you provide is 'people eating tasty animals'. I don't know how to tell you this, but this organization doesn't exist. I have found a single website, run by a single man claiming to make fun…
  26. 126.

    People should not eat animals

    For

    • This is my first debate, so I would like to start with something simple and pretty straight forward. There are three reasons why becoming vegetarian (defined as not eating the flesh of animals, a diet that may or may not include the consumption of eggs and milk) is both…
    • I apologize for my thoughtless comment. I'm a little full of myself. Thank you for debating with me; I look forward to any future debates between us, since we seem to disagree about so much.

    Against

    • Mathnerd: Of your three reasons to be a vegetarian (defined as not eating the flesh of animals, a diet that may or may not include the consumption of eggs and milk) is beneficial to both the vegetarian and to the global community. 1. A vegetarian diet is more healthful. All 13…
    • Mathnerd No harm no foul. I encourage you to always know your opponent. Read from your opponents' profiles, other debates and comments. Make judgments. Profile. Challenge. You did all this. You did the right things. I detected a little 'gotcha' - but that's fine. There was no…
  27. 127.

    Human cannibalism is morally wrong

    For

    • My opponent states that. "Morality does indeed concern itself with right conduct. Conduct is not a matter of social interaction, however," [1] However quoted from her very own source for the definition of conduct we see, "3 : a mode or standard of personal behavior especially…
    • My opponent argues that, Unfortunately simply because a belief is widespread does not make it morally wrong. The logic simply doesn't follow. Condemnation of incest, after all, is "nigh-universal", despite there being nothing morally wrong about it inherently and reproduction…

    Against

    • == RESPONSES == "Morality concernis itself with the issues of 'right conduct'. Conduct is a matter of social interaction, public opinion must surely have some bearing upon what is deemed moral and immoral and what proper conduct is. Also please note I have used the term…
    • Thank you for your response and your time. I'll respond to your counterarguments before wrapping up. RESPONSES "It is because the act of cannibalism evokes a nigh-universal sense of moral violation. Our (as in the general public) clear disgust and fascination with the subject…
  28. 128.

    It is morally permissible to sacrifice one innocent to save many

    For

    • My friend, thank you for re-iterating your argument; however, I will contest the premise of your argument that "the value of human life is immeasurable." Philosophically, this may perhaps be proven true. However, the reality is that people place values on human lives all the…
    • My friend, Thank you for thoroughly articulating your position. In response to Contentions 1, 2, and 3, I submit that I thoroughly agree with the spirit and intention of your position however I believe that your argument is fundamentally flawed. Your argument, fails to consider…

    Against

    • Now onto my case: The value of human life is immeasurable. Therefore, to say that we can be more productive in any way by saving the greater amount is neither logical, nor morally acceptable. How do you measure and compare the quantity of of x verses the quantity of y + z if…
    • I negate the resolution along the flow. I value morality with a conception based on deontology because it is always immoral to kill somebody. Contention 1: We wouldnt have a choice in the matter any way. If we don't kill to save many, everyone dies. So, there for, it is…
  29. 129.

    Eating dog meat should be illegal

    For

    • Extend.
    • == Dog is man's best friend == We should criminalize the production & consumption of dog meat because dogs have a special place in our society. We have collectively elevated the canine genus to a semi-anthropomorphic "pet" status, thereby justifying exclusive legal protections…

    Against

    • Well, my opponent's account has already been closed. Assuming it won't be reopened I won't bother writing an open argument. Pro's making the claim (that dog meat should be illegal), so Pro has burden of proof. Failure to prove that statement warrants me the automatic win. For…
  30. 130.

    Organ and tissue donation should be mandatory

    For

    • The Law Says So Is A Circular ArgumentWhat if the law said it wasn't a parent's responsibility to provide for their children?Saying the law says so is using the is-ought fallacy. No the law doesn't hold parents responsible for donating blood or organs to their children or to…
    • 1. Active v. Passive Taking of Life is a false distinction Active v. passive taking of life in either case knowingly results in someone's death. If a parent purposefully denied their child food and water for several days knowing they would die it would be considered murder. If…

    Against

    • After all that work.
    • OK, let's get started:First, since Pro did not specify who had the burden of proof, he has the burden of proof. However, he seems to have made the mistake of completely failing to even give, much less support, any of his contentions directly. He needs to at least make reference…
  31. 131.

    Taking one life to save several lives is morally justifiable

    For

    • brief road-map: this round is exclusively for voters and the summation of the debate. no new arguments or contentions will be brought up. I will only rebuild my case as well as address the preceding statements of the Negation. defense: value-Utilitarianism. It is not a…
    • Good luck in the following rounds. Foremost, allow me to address the inquiry regarding my Value of Utilitarianism. It is based on the defin ition presented by John Stuart Mill, a disciple of the inventor of Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham. Rebuttal: Value- Human Rights. While I…

    Against

    • Pro CaseValue: Utilitarianism. Once again, Pro has not even acknowledged the argument I made saying that Utilitarianism is unjust. The example I used was Slavery, saying that under Utilitarianism, we could justify enslaving 10% of the population if it would promote the general…
    • Pro Case Value: Utilitarianism. It has been made clear that Pro is arguing for John Stuart Mill's definition of Utilitarianism. As per John Stuart Mill's definition, pleasure is the end sought in morality. [1] So for the purposes of this debate, any reference to "utility"…
  32. 132.

    Stem cell research is moral and should be legal

    For

    • Unfortunately, i am under the impression Con is forfeiting the entire debate at this point. i will now however, provide voters with a list of a few sources on stem cell research: http://stemcells.nih.gov... http://www.stemcellresearchfacts.org... http://stemcell.stanford.edu...
    • Despite Con forfeiting her round, i will continue to make my argument. The following is a list of just a very small handful ailments, diseases, and disorders that have the potential to be treated with stem cells. Parkinsons Diabetes Kidney failure Heart Failure Vision problems…

    Against

    • Unfortunately Pro has forfeited this round, but instead of leaving it I'll list a couple disadvantages of stem cell research. First of all because embryonic stem cell research requires the subsequent destruction of the embryos used, it is a form of abortion. Creating embryos…
    • Good luck to you and may the best debater win.
  33. 133.

    A vegetarian diet is more ethical than a meat-eating diet

    For

    • Thank you for bringing up the "humane" options for meat. I think these are definitely better for the animals involved. As long as the animals are treated as well as they say and they are killed swiftly, I think it is just as ethical as a vegetarian diet. I really hope more…
    • No need for apologies. I hear you, school absolutely does suck. I'm glad we can find some common ground though. Let me clarify my position a little. Personally, I don't think eating animal flesh is wrong in itself. I think if a person doesn't cause an animal pain before…

    Against

    • First I will start with quoting what my opponent said in the start of the last round, "Let me clarify my position a little. Personally, I don't think eating animal flesh is wrong in itself. I think if a person doesn't cause an animal pain before slaughter, kills it swiftly, and…
    • 1st no need to opologise we share some of the same beliefs like evolution in creation. I believe based on proof that micro evolution is an important part of what goes on in the earth. That is the only proven part of evolution. But that's for another debate. Many more people in…
  34. 134.

    It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save more lives

    For

    • First thank you for debating with me and i'm looking foward to it... Second i am a new debator and i guess i should have clarifed that i wanted to LD debate so now i am kinda free running this... Usually you would have used that rounf you just id to attack my case AND present…
    • My Name is Hasan Mahdi and I am a new Debater. I realzie That this is an old topic but i would like to Try against someone..Oh and everyone in TX dont copy me... "It is the greatest good to the greatest number of people which is the measure of right and wrong." I agree to this…

    Against

    • This is an old debate but I was still interested in what someone would say about it and I also am always interested in "society" debates. We can take the stance that morality is a relative term, which you have obviously taken, or we could take the stance that morality is…
    • Sorry about last round. Time got away from me. But to suggest that I agree with you because I forfeited a round doesn't make sense. It makes sense to say that I may disagree with you only to a certain point and not totally because I didn't prioritize my time for debating. But…
  35. 135.

    Violence is never morally justified

    For

    • In this debate, I should set out to convince you of the proposition that violence is wrong according to a moral standard. While I hope my arguments apply generally, I shall also hope to rebut and circumvent my opponent's previously elaborated tactic regarding violence,…
    • This round left blank.

    Against

    • BackgroundThis debate is probably best described as an ongoing philosophical discussion between sdavio and myself regarding the nature of politics. Sdavio began his existence on this website with a staunchly moral libertarian position that not only advocated the non-aggression…
    • This debate was most enjoyable. I will first address PRO's main rebuttal, and then close with a detailed, step-by-step summary of exactly what the trolley dilemma entailed. RebuttalFor his last round, PRO's main rebuttal is that "a being which is conscious is always also in…
  36. 136.

    Vegetarianism is morally wrong

    For

    • Although I can see why some people choose to be vegetarians and the noble cause behind it, I contend that Vegetarianism is a wrong practice due to its conflict with Nature. 1. Human teeth structure contradicts vegetarianism: If we examine the teeth structure of both herbivorous…
    • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Human teeth structure contradicts vegetarianism: Unfortunately, Con has chosen not to tackle this argument any longer and since I cannot reply to any…

    Against

    • Good luck to both of us! :) My opponent begins by pointing out the human teeth structure. While it's true that we have teeth suited for consuming both meat and plants this doesn't necessarily mean we have to. Humans are, by nature, considered to be omnivores. .…
    • I will now conclude the debate with a few final rebuttals. I'll begin by addressing my opponent's statements about the Cro-Magnon man. He claimed that they were one group of people living in one small region. However, this is not entirely incorrect. When they roamed they were…
  37. 137.

    Racial classification is wrong for any purpose beyond aesthetics

    For

    • Right you are, I have used aesthetic in perhaps the popularised meaning as synonymous with 'pertaining to the visual'. I now know better. My mistake in this regard is only really a problem in the title, it's clear what I mean specifically by 'aesthtic differentiation' in the…
    • I'm afraid you may have misunderstood the term 'aesthetic differentiation', as the example you gave was a clear example of it. The woman was able to identify the assailant as black, thus differentiating him aesthetically from someone who is not black. I even said in my initial…

    Against

    • Well, that's why definitions are an important part of a debate, so we don't have semantic pitfalls such as this one. Oh, well. You can remake the debate.
    • I think you don't know what the word "aesthetic" means. Aesthetics is a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste, with the creation and appreciation of beauty. [1] Outward appearance is not necessarily aesthetic... [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...
  38. 138.

    Faking qualifications to get a job can be ethical

    For

    • That's all, humans.
    • Congratulations if you got here and voted on this debate. Thank you for reading.

    Against

    • People using fake qualifications are damaging the credibility and reputation of institutions of higher learning. The incidents of misrepresentation are serious and will not be tolerated in our country as they impact negatively on the credibility of the National Qualifications…
  39. 139.

    Dogs that attack humans should be euthanized

    For

    • Companion, warm and fuzzy feeling generator; you just playing semantics, and a misconceiving set of semantics at that. The term 'companion should truly just be reserved for the 'real deal' companionship that only comes from sacs of water (humans) when referring to a human the…
    • You want me to argue about your points and mine with the short 2,000 character limit? challenge accepted. For starters on your points; I can not believe you actually think a dogs companionship even hold a candle to that companionship from a partner or children give. they are…

    Against

    • I apologize for being late, and would just quickly like to say something. You have reasonable arguments, and so do I. We seem to have conflicting opinions on the meaning of the word 'dog'. I, having a pet, see it as an companion and a friend, you see it as a kind of meat…
    • I also thank you for your speedy response. Firstly, against your argument, I don't think that dogs are robots. Saying such a thing would imply that they are 'meat machines' which is of course not true. They are COMPANIONS, in the same way children or a partner would be. Robots…
  40. 140.

    Ambition forces people to compromise their moral values

    For

    • Debate Honorable judges, respected teachers and all my dear friends, Good morning to one and all! I am Fawwaz of Class 8th b from yellow house and I am going to speak for the motion. As we all know that the subject of debate today is "The desire to succeed makes us compromise…
    • Debate Honorable judges, respected teachers and all my dear friends, Good morning to one and all! I am Fawwaz of Class 8th b from yellow house and I am going to speak for the motion. As we all know that the subject of debate today is "The desire to succeed makes us compromise…

    Against

    • First of all let us try to understand the meaning of moral values. Moral Values are the rules and regulations which we follow to earn our dignity and respect in the society and moreover to be a good human being. The phrase "makes you compromise with moral values" in the sense…
    • First of all let us try to understand the meaning of moral values. Moral Values are the rules and regulations which we follow to earn our dignity and respect in the society and moreover to be a good human being. The phrase "makes you compromise with moral values" in the sense…
  41. 141.

    Eating meat is not immoral

    For

    • con hasn't shown that it is inherently immoral to eat meat. at best he has given some examples of situatins here it is immoral. if i am growing a cow on a farm, there's no serious way i could be considdred to be hindering third world people from the meals they could be eating.…
    • so can we agree that maybe eating too much meat is not a good idea? that doesn't mean i concede, just that i am accommodating. and curious how far you take the 'we don't need to eat it as much' argument. there are always more efficient methods of producing food, does that mean…

    Against

    • This is the final round, so I'll try to keep this more of a summary than anything else. con hasn't shown that it is inherently immoral to eat meat. at best he has given some examples of situatins here it is immoral.I have not given situations, but REALITIES of what…
    • I will fully concede the point that while we may be evolutionarily driven to eat more meat than we should, that yes, it is technically possible we could eat healthier amounts of meat, and thus I will no longer pursue point 4. I will not however, give your second rebuttal as…
  42. 142.

    Human life should be valued above animal life

    For

    • Sorry for the misunderstanding about the topic. In that case, I will change the direction of my argument. For this argument, I want to answer my opponent's questions. My opponent asks, "1. Why is the life of a Human worth more? 2. Why is the life of an Animal worth less? 3.…
    • Sorry I forgot to cite my sources for my last argument. Sources: (1)Oxford Dictionary of English (2)http://mycropht.wordpress.com... One reason humans are superior is their creation of the art of persuasion. The shelter employees do a very good job of persuading people to adopt…

    Against

    • My opponent states: "We can both agree that human life is more superior. And as we all know, superior things are greater in importance." I agree. However, the importance of something is, as you said, depends on your "emotions and ethics" as for some, a superior item may be…
    • I admit that the topic I have chosen is misleading as my argument is actually on Animal Rights, which I have clarified in the comments section, with the value of life as a supporting detail rather than the main idea. Copied and pasted from my comment posted 5 hours ago, which…
  43. 143.

    Killing someone is morally equivalent to letting them die

    For

    • I will separate my rebuttal into different sections for different points. =Section1====================================================================== "You don't always have the luxury of saving a person, and it is in that scenario where killing and letting die are not…
    • I confirm that I have agreed to not limiting the topic to one scenario. However, my opponent provides scenarios that obviously do not follow Guideline 2: "Bob does NOT know beforehand that the child will die. However, he knows that if the child loses balance, the child will…

    Against

    • "OK, something my opponent fails to understand: Without the chance to save the victim, the outcome of ANY decision you make will be death. By removing all positive outcomes from the situation, you have made every decision have a negative outcome, and thus be morally equivalent.…
    • "However, my opponent provides scenarios that obviously do not follow Guideline 2: 'Bob does NOT know beforehand that the child will die. However, he knows that if the child loses balance, the child will fall out the window. He knows that if the child falls out the window, the…
  44. 144.

    Individuals have a moral obligation to help someone in need

    For

    • This is for serious people only if not serious i will report abuse on all of your posts comments and arguemnets.Okey this is just my aff case to refute my case or an arguement just put "agianst busby123 post #" "In any moment of decision the best thing you can do is the right…
    • okey this resolution calls for individuals so this party a and b isnt relevent to this topic Now to attack the whole case above this post i dont really undestand ur case u r just giving example so i think my case still stands since u didnt refute it

    Against

    • See round 3
    • My opponent has forfeited the round. I guess he sees my point. Here's the same debate by different people if anyone is interested: http://www.debate.org... Resolution is still negated.
  45. 145.

    Everyone should be treated equally under the law

    For

    • Yeah, good game. I don't know when, or if, I'll change my profile. Maybe soon. I do concede, as I don't have good arguments.
    • I guess it's time to fix the holes in my argument.I'll amend my assumption of people getting equal treatment. It is true that punishments should be given, yet only to few. We're to pass out a law stating that "If one does misdeeds, then they are to be punished". We will treat…

    Against

    • Yes, plenty more objections; however, since you are goal post shifting, you clearly agree that the statement you made was incorrect. Therefore, I win the debate.
    • The problem is, you're cherry picking instances where people should be treated equally. However, there are PLENTY of instances where people should not be treated equally. For example, people are judged based on their actions; a serial killer should NOT be treated equally with a…
  46. 146.

    Animals should have the same rights as humans

    For

    • Animals are living creatures, and just like us they feel pain, and suffering. if they are always loyal to us then why do they not deserve the same rights that we have
    • Thank you for the prompt reply from my opponent. I am led to believe that my opponent does not quite understand where I am coming from. 1. My opponent assumed that when I said that animals should have the same rights, that I meant all the same rights. But it is obvious there…

    Against

    • I will offer assurance that I do understand where my opponent is coming from. The fact that I do not take it in the intended direction is merely a product of my insanity. 1. If humans and animals do not have all the same rights, than they would not have the some rights. If…
    • Thanks to my open for the timely response. However, the resolution that animals deserve the same rights as humans as still not upheld. My opponent does not seem to have understood exactly what I am arguing. 1. The point that animals do not have rights by virtue of being living…
  47. 147.

    Killing one person to save one million is morally permissible

    For

    • yes, be a doll and get me some goat milk
    • sorry, I lost, I thought everyone would die if we didn't kill this one person. my bad.

    Against

    • HEATHER, YOU NOT SMART PERSON, THERE SHOULD BE AN "S" AFTER GOAT "UGH! ME BEAT YOU! uGH!" yEAH! U SURRENDER! WHoops! the caps lock was on! I win again!
    • no! i'm sitting right next to you, telling you what to say and you still failed. so...do you forfeit?
  48. 148.

    Pit bulls should be euthanized

    For

    • Yo Con...wher u at? Get at me dogg! one hundred characters is fun to type, i love typing, typie, type type...It is fun to forfeit b/c I get to type while you two frolick in the sand stepping on piss clams and rubbing each others ashy nipples.
    • All Pit bulls should be euthanized bc... They're baby killers They will bite your face off They will bite your kids face off The dogs name is Pit Bull b/c they were raised to fight in pits. Cesar Milan is an illegal immigrant Their is an enormous overpopulation problem of dogs…

    Against

    • Alright sorry Dawgs yall gotta chill ya know chill ! HOLLA! BABY I HOLLA BACK AT YOU all around dat 24/7 yanadadamean dawg? to interpret: i deeply apologize for missing the last round casopia. i owe you one. homie. anywhom, my reason for not providing the hmtl link to the…
    • here we go! i strongly negate the resolution that all pit bulls should be euthanized. I will begin by attacking my opponent's case and conclude with the construction of my own. my opponent makes the implication that because "there are aggression issues with pit bulls" that all…
  49. 149.

    Governments should adopt presumed consent for organ donation

    For

    • I wanted to take advantage of this last round to express my gratitude to my opponent who has struck up a very interesting topic and full of input for thought. Reflections put forward by my opponent are full of references to laws and religious theories of individual who most…
    • Secondly, I would like to provide some numbers in order to precisely identify how great the problem related to insufficient number of donors is. At the same time, I would like to point out the mortality rate for people listed (/waiting) for organ transplantation. Every day in…

    Against

    • :) My opponent initially brings up an emotional appeal, trying to prove his side by showing statistics of suffering. While his statistics are relatively correct, it is essential to understand presumed consent, and the effects it will have on society. To effectively counter such…
    • :) Let the argumentation begin. Abraham Lincoln was once quoted in saying, "No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent. " Presumed consent is a disputable issue. Taking organs from someone should not be something done without that person's consent.…
  50. 150.

    PETA's animal euthanasia practices are unethical

    For

    • 1. The receptionist stated that PETA did not operate an animal shelter. When I indicated that PETA did report to operate an animal shelter and that this office has inspected in it in the past, an additional staff member was called to the desk and reiterated that there was no…
    • Peta has killed more than 10,000 animals rescued. Why? I dont know, thats what the debate is for. Duh!

    Against

    • My last argument is this: "logangoodyear forfeited this round. This round has not been posted yet." Done.
    • Your argument you posted is "here-say" dialogue and doesn't include any sources. Here's an actual response from PETA: This campaign is the work of the deceitfully-named Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF), a front group for Philip Morris, Outback Steakhouse, KFC, cattle ranchers,…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.