Ethics Debate Topics for Kids
58 debate topics, kids. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 1.
Animals should not be used in circuses
For
- Now lets get on with my first argument. Animals are mistreated in circuses Animals shouldn"t be used in circuses because they are mistreating the animals. Exotic animals are supposed to be free roaming the wild, not under a big tent jumping through hoops of fire and balancing…
- You have no evidence whatsoever to support your thesis, but i do credit you for trying to face me in a debate. Animals kept in captivity shortens their lifespans. Animals shouldn"t be used in circuses because keeping animals in captivity shortens their life spans. Studies show…
Against
- i accept
- I like them in circuses because they are for are enjoyment
- 2.
Animals should be protected within reasonable limits
For
- Your opponent does want to add something, thank you for continuing the debate. Have you no heart? It is that kind of thinking that starts wars. For example, take when Spain and Britain conquered the Americas. They pretty much considered the Native Americans animals, and…
- Sure we can leave them behind, if you don't want any more burgers or pepperoni/sausage pizza. Animals play an important role in our diet, and I don't think people want to be stuck eating bread and fruit all the time. Or what about pets? The wolves and cougars out in the wild…
Against
- I'll begin my own argument now. Argument:The majority of animals are hostile to other creatures, like us humans. Some examples of hostile animals include: Wolves, Bears, Tigars, Lions, and Rhinocerouses. If we kill off these beasts, we'd be able to expand our territory. With…
- I don't think animals are that huge of a worry. We can leave them behind.
- 3.
Humans should stop killing and harassing animals
For
- Hi,we [humans] are killing and ..............Very cruellyions and tigers specially) and humans are not different, we all are same. We should not get punished since lions and tigers are not getting punished. You compared yourself with animals. Compare yourself if you feel so.…
- HE(Y)LLO HUMAN STOP EATING ANIMALS AND ENCOURAGING ANIMAL KILLERS** If we are really humans we should not eat and kill the animals anymore and we should not encourage the people who are killing animals. If we feel that we have only right to live on this earth and not for…
Against
- Pro's rebuttal focuses on the point that humans are very different from other animals. But humans are animals (even Pro agrees to this). Anyway that is not even my main point. My point is that if we do not raise livestock and kill them, what will we do with them? We will…
- I extend previous arguments.
- 4.
All animals should have rights to enjoy their natural environment
For
- Good day my dear friend, I felt it so much for not replying you as I have forfeited round 2 because my internet was faulty but thank God I have fix it now. 1. Capturing animals is cruel, period. Animals have their own rights, and they have their own lives in the wild. Capturing…
- Good day ladies and gentle,I am debating on the topic "All Animals should be given the right to enjoy there natural habitat" and I am for the motion. However, before I go further I would like to give the meaning of important words on this topic,and I will like to start with the…
Against
- your question was animals in general not zoo animals. I think you have asked the wrong question l as you argument now is just on zoo animals. I can agree that some zoo animals would be happier outside of the zoo but you should think of the needs of the many outweigh the needs…
- Everyone gives up against me ;) just kidding
- 5.
Animals should not be kept in zoos
For
- Again, I have nothing else to add. This debate was very disappointing.
- As my opponent has forfeited, I have nothing else to add.
Against
- no animals are suffring
- 6.
The use of animals for sport and entertainment should be banned
For
- Animals are harmed when used as objects of entertainment, no matter how innocent that entertainment is
- Blood sports cannot be justified by reference to their role in pest control or conservation
Against
- Animals can be used to enhance the quality of human life
- Fighting bulls have a better quality of life than meat-producing bulls
- 7.
Elephants should have certain inalienable rights
For
- "Pro just doesn't offer any links between having a smaller brain at birth than in adulthood with providing inalienable rights. He just says that they are similar thus they should have rights. " Con Humans have been given inalienable rights. Pro has proven elephants are very…
- Elephants should have certain inalienable rights because they are sentient and have nearly the intelligence of humans. Claim 1: elephant brains are similar to humans. Warrant:" Interestingly, the growth and development of the elephant's brain is similar to that of mans. Both…
Against
- Similarity does not equate to "they must be equal". Let's take a rock - most of these have carbon. We have carbon in us. Therefore, they should have inalienable rights. Um ... no. Similarity doesn't mean that you SHOULD do something ... pro doesn't offer a reason WHY this is…
- C1. Intellectual similaritiesPro just doesn't offer any links between having a smaller brain at birth than in adulthood with providing inalienable rights. He just says that they are similar thus they should have rights. But, I can say this: a rock has an astounding 0% new-born…
- 8.
People should not keep pets
For
- To start off, you state many health benefits to keeping pets. These can easily be refuted by the fact that pets can carry many diseases, such as roundworm, bird flu, and sore mouth, to name a few. You can find a full list below. Also, many of your arguments raise the benefits…
- I believe that we, as a species, should not keep pets when we can't even keep our own population alive and healthy. In the year of 2014, U.S.A. citizens spent a total of $58.04 billion on pets. Thats enough money to feed 20152700 people for a year based on a $240 grocery cost…
Against
- Extend all.
- Although pets may carry some potential risks , the benefits greatly outwheigh those , refer to round 1.Futher Pro's argument with regards to animal cruelty is absolutely irrlevant. This is a red herring fallacy. The resolution before us clearly states. WE. Refering to Humans.We…
- 9.
Animals should have legal rights
For
- I believe animals should have rights. First reason is that we are them, all animals. We have very close DNA's; for example cats actually share 90% of their DNA with us. Second reason is they have their own rights to live because they have their own lives, emotion, pain, even…
- Do not state your first argument here. Please write back ASAP. Thank you for debating.
Against
- I accept, looking forward to the debate!
- Good debate, pro.
- 10.
Keeping fish as pets should be illegal
For
- Explain how it violates the Constitution.
- My Opponent can make an argument in the opening round, or just acept it doesn't matter to me. We are supposed to be debating the merits of the people in the two house, please no loophole exploitation (if a loophole exists)We are permitted to ask eachother questions at the end…
Against
- "Other rights of the people" is part of the 9th amendment. This includes the right to keep fish as pets.
- Illegality of keeping fish as pets violates the constitution.
- 11.
Puppy mills should be made illegal
For
- Thank you, and very original way of debating :) "In summary rights require two things: Rationality, i.e. they are a code of action that applies to other rational beings, and Reciprocity, for treating beings in a manner consistent with rights that they do not treat you with is…
- Hello and welcome :) ---DEFINITIONS----- Puppy mills: large scale commercial dog breeding facility that operates under substandard conditions regarding the well-being of dogs in their care. http://en.wikipedia.org... illegalized: to make illegal…
Against
- The purpose of laws is the protection of rights from violation by other parties. Politics, the field in which rights are discussed, begins when one realizes the impact other rational creatures tend to have on one's life. Any discussion of "rights," the proper relations between…
- " Since there are so many laws protecting dogs, puppy mills should be considered one of them. " Since there are so many laws mandating the stoning of adulterers, America should get one too. Does not follow :). " Yes, it would be going backwards for him. :) " in other words, you…
- 12.
Zoos are bad for animals
For
- rougeagent21, I seem to have run out of time. I am sorry for this. I had a lot of things going on. Again sorry for this. I am upset about it. Please let me konw if you can debate me on this again.
- It is ok I understand. My arguments follow on to this round. I hope you get your computer fixed. Good Luck.
Against
- Sounds great.
- Alright, sorry about that. It should be good now. I will first state my own case, and then address my opponent's. Zoos take in animals whose habitats have been, or are being, destroyed, or that do not have enough food. Zoos help the animals by putting them in captivity,…
- 13.
Animal abuse should be prohibited by law everywhere
For
- Killing poor innocent animals is wrong because animals might not look like u's because they have four legs but they are animals just like we are so hurting them is like hurting a human because we all have two arms, two legs, a brain, a head, a pair of eyes, and a heart . All…
- its a crime because children would be scared of their family if they hurt an animal because a kid cares about pets such as dogs and birds and theyre all animals and they might think theyre family is crazy for hurting an animal and hide from their family and woul be alone…
Against
- Yes, we understand that animals having feelings and have a brain and that they do not have the same physical appearance as we do. I support strongly in no animal abuse. I believe people that are caught committing an act of abuse, bad consequences should be awarded such as…
- Of, course animal abuse should not be acceptable and sure as heck should not be acceptable when children are near. It is wrong to treat animals with disrespect and to mistreat animals. It's bad.
- 14.
Child beauty pageants should be banned by law
For
- Children should not be put into beauty pageants! The show "Toddlers & Tiaras" shows the horror behind all the fake hair, flippers, and make-up. Parents feed their children an endless supply of pixie stix to keep their energy up. When the child does not want to do a pageant, few…
- This was my first debate, and I found it very enjoyable. I really thought no one would offer to debate me, but someone did! By making child beauty pageants illegal, we can help the children of our country. This is a very important cause. I have invested my time in countless…
Against
- In conclusion I think I might lose this because I didn't really have many points to raise apart from this:Just because something is inadvisable in some cases doesn't mean it's harmful in all cases nor that the children may not gain self confidence from being so admired. It's…
- The main issue I have with the pro side of this debate is that you have a burden of broof regarding the extent of harm that being a child beauty pageant causes a child being so severe that it should be deemed illegal. You have not supplied one piece of evidence regarding any…
- 15.
Animals should not be used in circuses
For
- The use of animals in circuses should be banned. I say this because we don"t realize what the animals actually go through. They are treated with merciless physical punishment such as being beat or whipped and are in chains or locked up for most of their life when they are not…
- Animals deserve to be treated with respect. Not confined in small spaces or tortured with whips and sharp objects. It"s not unlikely that animals used in circuses can break loose . This is often caused by extremities of abuse that they can't take any more, so they snap and harm…
Against
- I do not believe that animals should be in the circus at all. They belong out in the wild not caged up and on trains traveling place to place. The training is also in humane. The lions and tigers get hit with whips and do not belong to live in small cages. Animals fear the…
- 16.
Animal abuse should be stopped
For
- Objects- A material or thing that can be seen and touched but Not Living. Animals- a living organism that feeds on organic matter, typically having specialised sense organs and nervous system and able to respond rapidly to stimuli. "My opponent has not shown why Animals are not…
- "You can't convince a tiger not to hunt when it's hungry, not even if the potential prey would be someone's baby. This is because the tiger can't see it's *doing bad* by hunting your baby, so it cannot make a choice, between feeding its stomach or sparing the life of a baby. "…
Against
- First off, I mispoked or in this case, miswrote about the " Object " thing... so I apologize. What I meant to write, was that Animals are inferior to Humans and therefore are not entitled to rights and protections under the law. The reasons which I have presented : Lack of…
- " We have the choice of eating either meat or vegetable. Tigers don't have a choice but to eat meat because they are carnivores. " Some People choose to become Vegetarians because Humans have the Higher Order Thinking Processes to make that decision for themselves. However, my…
- 17.
Eating roadkill is morally wrong
For
- First I'd like to point out a clear conduct violation. JohnBenBen has referred to me as "my opponent", but that's extremely offensive because that's suggesting I belong to him, which I don't . It's the other way round.If you're in a car that runs over an animal. you should all…
- When some klutz hits an animal in the road, what you should do is just kill yourself to balance out all the karma and ying yang in the universe. Duh. You can tell that my opponent hasn't really tested roadkill properly. He's probably the type that would be too sissy to do that.…
Against
- My opponent is kind of confused, because after my first post, I actually owned him. I still do. His argument is clearly just a spurt of unnecessary confidence that shall be shut down promptly. Look, when it comes to the whole BOGO bogus, my opponent has got something wrong…
- First I'd like to point out the clear conduct violation. My opponent has addressed me as he, but I am a she. Just because I usually talk like a dude doesn't mean I am a dude. I was born that way, alright? It could be a seven point loss just for intolerance, but I'm not going to…
- 18.
Keeping animals in zoos is morally wrong
For
- Exploiting animals for the purpose of our own entertainment is morally on many different levels.
- Extend all arguments.
Against
- Zoos are not usually meant for entertainment most of the time. They are meant as a place to have kids learn about animals they may have not seen before. Kids can more easily learn about something if they see it up close. Opening arguments. 1: Zoos keep endangered animals, like…
- 19.
Zoos should not keep animals in captivity
For
- Animals should not be kept in zoos. A zoo is the equivalent of a prison. Imagine being imprisoned for no reason whatsoever. Humans and animals deserve freedom. Animals are just as important as humans. Zoos such as tweedle have been careless and thoughtless. In 2010, a CAPS…
- Animals are in this world. We are all equal. We all live in one world. We should respect each other. There is no point in proving it because if you had a brain you should work it out for yourself thus if you think humans are more important than the inoccent animals then you…
Against
- I would like to take note of the fact that the opponent has decided to post more evidence in the final round, thus I can only assume this is a rebutall and summary round. Let's begin:"Animals are just as important as humans" - No evidenceI agree that it is mean to torture…
- If you were here professing that rocks and twigs deserve rights, I would call you a madman. Animals can be seen in the same way. Like rocks an animal has no soul, and only a soul begets rights. Most importantly animals aren't concious and cannot Think or be self aware for the…
- 20.
Animals should not be used in circuses
For
- Animals in circuses may have access to more medicine than in the wild but it is not like a zoo. Most zoos try to keep the animals as natural as possible but circuses don't. When is it ever natural for an elephant to do a headstand? Or for a bear to ride a bike? The British…
- Animals may provide entertainment but that doesn't mean it is right to use them. People used to think a hanging was good family entertainment but you wouldn't agree to that, would you? The animals have been treated horribly in order to make them do what the trainers want them…
Against
- I still don't see why it's not possible for animals to be used in a circus without harming the animal. Of course there will be times when some circuses abuse or harm their animals to get them to do something, but I don't believe the answer is a straight out ban. Perhaps some…
- Let us ask ourselves "Does performing in a circus harm the animal?". I believe that it is possible for an animal to be used in the circus for entertainment and not be harmed. Consider the actions they do: Performing tricks, walking around, and some are just there to add a…
- 21.
Humans are morally superior to animals
For
- I suppose I should also wait for round 2 to present my arguments. Readers please note that this is my decision.
- Who did you agree before and after: This is irrelevant to who won but it would be interesting to see if anyone changed his/her mind. So vote! Who had better conduct: A tie since this was a friendly debate and neither of us got angry or frustrated with our opponent. As for this…
Against
- Before I begin I would like to point out that as he is the affirmative and the topic is his invention, he bears the burden of proof. My argument is simple. Humans are not superior to animals for a few very simple reasons. But before I go into that allow me to define the terms…
- I noticed your comment about this on another debate and thought I would challenge you to this. I will outline my arguments when my opponent has responded, I thank him in advance for what I hope will be a stimulating debate.
- 22.
Individuals have a duty to help those in need
For
- Thanks to Romanii for a fabulous debate! In this round I'll review Con's case and conclude with reasons to vote Pro. Due to character constraints, I may only touch on certain points. Please do not construe this as me dropping any argument; if my initial arguments may still…
- I would like to sincerely thank Romanii for this great debate! In this round, I will address Con's third round remarks only.C1: Duty to RescueCon's only argument against this contention is that there is no difference between acts of commission and acts of omission. Therefore,…
Against
- Unfortunately, due to time constraints on my part, my argument here is going to have to be rather brief. Apologies to anyone, including Pro, who is disappointed by the lack of substance in what follows :(As agreed upon in comments, I will be attempting the rebut both Pro's…
- Thanks to Pro for his great counter-rebuttals!Now it's time for me to go back and address Pro's rebuttals... O_oLike my arguments and rebuttals, all my counter-rebuttals function independently of each other.C1) Moral NihilismFirst of all, apologies for any confusion with…
- 23.
Eating dogs should be illegal
For
- You don't eat dogs even if they don't do anything.But it has been proven that dogs always to something for there owners or for themselves.There are some dogs who don't work for the force and they still always stay in the front yard and protect there owners. You also haven't…
- Hi my name is Sahaam and I believe that we should NOT eat dogs. My 1st point is that there are some animals we can eat and some animals that we shouldn't eat, like dogs.Its just cruel, dogs are said to be mans best friends which plenty of people think is true. My 2nd point is…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited the round. Sahaam has not demonstrated in this debate that it is inherently wrong to eat dogs. Instead, Sahaam has described certain circumstances in which eating a dog should not be considered morally permissible(though the reasons that these…
- You don't eat dogs even if they don't do anything.You haven't given me a reason why.But it has been proven that dogs always to something for there owners or for themselves.Why would I care about what a dog does for itself?There are some dogs who don't work for the force and…
- 24.
Keeping animals in zoos is unethical
For
- Vote my opponent. He has won.
- You win, Uchi. I concede. I'll get my revenge!!!
Against
- Excellent. I will get right into rebuttals.Pro claims that humans are animals, and therefore, animals have all the rights that we assign to ourselves as humans such as life and liberty. If true, this would certainly disallow keeping animals in zoos. However, it is clear from…
- Thanks, Pro. That was a very creative acceptance rap. Pro is correct in observing that the majority of the BOP lies on him. In fact, I'm not completely sure why I didn't structure this debate so that he could give his opening argument first... Nevertheless, I will provide a…
- 25.
Animal cruelty should be illegal
For
- Let me rephrase my last statement. I don't think that Animal cruelty is a small issue I believe that it is a big issue but one that is taken out of context by the media and groups like PETA. I would like to touch on how you stated that the tiger in the village is angered by the…
- Hello to you as well and thanks for debating with me today on this topic! To get this first round started I would like to first say that I do not think that animal cruelty is as big as a problem that people make it out to be. I think that the media over exaggerates almost…
Against
- Hunters in my opinion do not kil animals for their survial.some are good in this case..but many kill animals like elephant for example and their skin and teeth at higer costs..wild pig is also killed at sold at higher prices.do you also know peacock which is national bird of…
- Hello..this is bad of your part that you think this topic cruelty on animals is not a big issue..if you had a liitle concern to show on them you must go for their help,you said true that tiger is serious threat for people in the village but who had made this..who had made this…
- 26.
Ten-hour music loops are immoral
For
- When one person steal something from another person, that is called thievery. In the case of music, one person taking another published work and calling it their own is thievery. If I take music from an artist, loop it for ten hours, and upload it to YouTube to generate views…
- Rounds: 1) Acceptance 2) Opening Arguments 3) Rebuttals 4) Closing 5) Thank Yous Definitions: Ten Hour Music Loops - The looping of a song, not owned by an individual, for ten hours that is uploaded to YouTube
Against
- I am arguing that ten hour music loops are moral.
- I would say the same thing. As much as I love winning debates, you have argued a very compelling side. Thanks for a nice debate.
- 27.
People should always be honest about their own flaws
For
- if girls wanted to be raped, it wouldnt be rape help the enslaved muslims by banning islam, so that they one day can be honest about themselves to
- i say it will end as a failed marshemellow experiment overflowing and ultimately killing us all by its shere tsunami wave of destruction and death... marshemellow apocalypse
Against
- "Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could To where it bent in the undergrowth; Then took the other, as just as fair, And having perhaps the better claim Because it was grassy…
- Some say the world will end in fire, Some say in ice. From what I've tasted of desire I hold with those who favor fire. But if it had to perish twice, I think I know enough of hate To say that for destruction ice Is also great And would suffice.
- 28.
Everyone should always tell the truth
For
- I have no further arguments, and has no more arguments to refute.
- It's true that reality is sometimes brutal, but it doesn't mean we should ignore it because it's unpleasant. It also might be true that the most mentally stable people are those who lie, but you should keep in mind that kids are also telling the truth all the time. You can't…
Against
- Honesty isn't always the best policy. Nobody wants to hear that they look heavier or less attractive. People who are honest all the time are considered blunt, antisocial, and pathological. Modern society is all built around lies. The movies you watch are people acting, and…
- 29.
Circuses with animals should be banned
For
- Excuse me, but are you freaking KIDDING ME? Animals enjoy circuses because of treats and AFFECTION? We LEGALLY must treat them nicely, give them affection and company? Animals used in circus are treated brutally! They are kept hungry and cruel treatment is meted out to them!…
- Circus is a criminal towards animals. In your profile, I saw you chose PRO at the Animal Rights point, so why are you even arguing in that point? And, I also saw you are a Christian and that you believe in the Bible. First of all I am sorry for that, and second thing is, if you…
Against
- Circus is a criminal towards animals. In your profile, I saw you chose PRO at the Animal Rights point, so why are you even arguing in that point?I am PRO animal rights because I am not for torturing creatures, treating them like trash, starving them, etc.And, I also saw you are…
- Let us start!
- 30.
Animal zoos should be banned worldwide
For
- The best kept animals in the best zoos of the world still do not live as long as they would have in the wild. [Wild Elephants Live Longer Than Their Zoo Counterparts http://news.nationalgeographic.com...]Regardless of the level of luxury provided by a zoo; regardless of why or…
- Even if I agree with every point you make towards education and preservation, your points never outweigh the transgression against another living thing through captivity. The creatures are powerless to prevent themselves from being confined. If any sentient being that is able…
Against
- To address the issue about the cruelty on animals, I would say that zoo animals are not beaten to death; they are well cared of by their caretaker. Zoos are arranged in away that animals are living in almost similar environment they used to live. We are talking about animals in…
- I believe the biggest benefits of zoos are educating the public on not only the animals, but how we can all contribute to conservation measures in our everyday lives. Also, people are able to see animals they might never be able to otherwise, and that brings a passion for…
- 31.
Animals should not be confined in zoos
For
- Good luck to my opponent.My value is needs theoryNeeds Theory is the assumption that certain people (animals) have different wants and needs and will do whatever possible to achieve them.My criterion is free travelFree travel is the ability to move freely without being…
- My opponent did not make a speech last round so I have nothing else to add.Thank you
Against
- "Zoos teach people that it is acceptable to interfere with animals and keep them locked up in captivity, where they are bored, cramped, lonely, deprived of all control over their lives, and far from their natural homes." Yes, it is true that zoos can be educational, but do they…
- "Zoos teach people that it is acceptable to interfere with animals and keep them locked up in captivity, where they are bored, cramped, lonely, deprived of all control over their lives, and far from their natural homes." Yes, it is true that zoos can be educational, but do they…
- 32.
People have a moral obligation to buy video games
For
- I shall be the affirmative for this debate, and argue that all have a moral obligation to purchase video games. Resolutional Analysis: The affirmative will be operating under the assumption that morality is absolute, and that what is right for one is right for another. With…
Against
- Sadly, looks like a forfeit. :/
- My opponent has not explained his absence, yet. I am willing to forgive this round's lack of an argument if he can provide one before the next round is over.
- 33.
Animals are sentient beings deserving moral consideration
For
- I know, most debaters just state opinions or facts that aren't true, because they don't cite."Self-recognition is different the self-awareness."You say that humans are self aware at a certain age, and they can recognize themselves in the mirror easily. Some animals can…
- Thank you, Con."So the human brain isn't all though different from most animals. It is slightly, some parts are larger, smaller or more complex then animals. However, not by much. The main difference between the human brain and animal brains is the size ratio. The human brain…
Against
- Alright, thank you for your argument. It is rare to see an opponent who actually cites their work. Rebuttals: The human brain: All right, so I did a bit more research, and it turns out I was wrong. While it is true that there are animals that have a higher brain to body mass…
- Alright, I'm glad we can agree on our definition of sentience. Rebuttals: "Koko learned sign language from a tutor. If you tried to teach it to another animal, it would fail". This is true to some extent. If you tried teaching sign language to a dolphin it just couldn't do it.…
- 34.
Wild animals should not be kept in zoos
For
- Zoos keep their animals in enclosures too small for them. A scientific study was done to determine the minimum amount of space required for animals to be healthy. It was found that the bigger the animal the more likely it was to not have sufficient room. Animals that weigh more…
- A zoos only purpose is it's entertainment value. They fail to educate people about animals. They do not provide adequate housing for the animals under their care. Nor do they help with conservation in any significant way. Zoos are worse than useless; they are harmful.
Against
- Rebuttals: I wouldn't necessarily say that animal habitats are bad, no. A little enclosure actually means a lot to a certain specimen. Zoos are safe places for animals especially endangered species, I believe that I have clarified this aspect before. Now, you say that the…
- -I will be arguing as the contender, meaning that I agree that keeping animals in zoos is perfectly okay. Considering the facts that zoos have been improving significantly for the past of an estimated years 1,000 years.Definition:Before we start, I think it is important for me…
- 35.
Animals should be freed from zoos
For
- Sorry, my toilet was clogged. Since my opponent decided to leave what appears at be an... argument?!? in my toilet what seems to be 24 hous ago. I would like to also point out that since my opponent is indeed an ostrich. This makes any and all arguements from it thoroughly…
- -Hello my opponent. I must say that it sure is chilly in here... -As I am sure everyone here is aware of, the moose will be defending the animals rights to live their lives free of useless captivity. -My opponent states " There is still that elements". This is indeed true, as…
Against
- My opponent has forfeited and this means that I have automatically won - as said in Round 1 where the rules were stated. CONCLUSION I'll continue my conclusion anyway. It is our moral imperative to protect this planet and everything that lives on it. You may think that I am…
- I honestly cannot say anything in response to my opponents first proper paragraph. "The Moose" has just quoted a random part of my argument and started waffling on about elements and E=MC 2. This is irrelevant to what I was saying. You only quoted around half a sentence. Any…
- 36.
Enslaving bees is immoral
For
- "Con was incorrect in his definition of self-aware and was associating self-awareness with the human ability of utilizing abstract thinking, complex reasoning, using tools etc." First, Con is having an identity crisis and has got Pro and Con confused. Pro is stupidape and Con…
- "Bees are not self-aware" Con The majority of scientific evidence supports the contrary claim that bees are sentient, also know as self-aware. 2,500 studies showing animal sentience. [1]. Bees have a brain. "On its head, a bee has two sensory antennae. It also has five eyes"…
Against
- Pro has confused himself as Con was correcting his own mistaken definition in his original argument, admitting fault. Not accusing Pro of having an incorrect definition. Pro's entire first paragraph is now irrelevant and his questions won't be addressed. "Pro contends this…
- Con was incorrect in his definition of self-aware and was associating self-awareness with the human ability of utilizing abstract thinking, complex reasoning, using tools etc. "Bees have the ability to learn." A large amount of animals are capable of learning. I don't believe…
- 37.
It is acceptable to snitch on wrongdoers
For
- My opponent first started with the example of the holocaust. I have already stated that it is the snitch's decision. They can make the decision if they want to turn in the Jews or not. In the case of the holocaust the people were brainwashed into thinking Jews were bad. You…
- What the police are able to do is make places safer. Smoking weed is illegal and is thus a crime so the police should be told. As for something as simple as running a red light people can always be left with a warning such as if the car was very close to the light but it still…
Against
- Yes, my opponent has stated that it is the snitch's decision. .. however, that's not the point of my observation. The point is that turning in the Jews in that situation would be NOT okay. Snitching in that situation would be NOT okay, which is the pertinent question of the…
- My opponent makes a logical leap from "smoking weed is a crime" to "the police should be told". Is my opponent suggesting that in all cases, the police should be informed of a crime?Is my opponent suggesting that laws are infallible? In the holocaust, the Jews were rounded up…
- 38.
Abusive language should always be avoided
For
- Anyway do it now please.
- I'll negate the argument of con (although I don't believe there can be anyone against the title, so if you are convinced then don't abuse ever again)
Against
- Commie. http://www.youtube.com...
- I would like to use a transitional argument. 1.Someone attacks you with their tongue. This paralyses you. 2.You insult their girlfriend or boyfriend. 3.They punch you. 4. You use a paralyze heal. 5. They punch you again. 6. You use your handy dandy Pikachu and shock them until…
- 39.
Keeping animals in zoos is cruel
For
- As Pro has failed to show up, It looks like I'm debating K_Michael_Tolman then. . . K_Michael_Tolman stated in the comments: "" The savanna would be completely changed forever. Prey animals like gazelle and zebras would grow unchecked, And would eventually get to a population…
- sillydebater four-fitted this round.
Against
- I am not saying that is wouldn't be cruel to take people's dogs away. I started this debate because I know some people DO think that to keep lions and cheetahs and animals like that is cruel and i wanted people who think that to see why it isn't cruel.
- I personaly do NOT think that it is cruel. Try to prove me wrong!
- 40.
African governments should implement tougher protections for animals
For
- The justice system does not currently work
- Natural habitats being are destroyed
Against
- Heavy handed approaches do not solve the motivations for poaching
- Legalising the trade of horns, ivory, furs and pelts would be more effective
- 41.
It is acceptable to kill one person to save many
For
- Killing one person is the rational choice
- More 'good' is produced by saving five lives than saving one
Against
- The act of killing is emotionally damaging
- Killing is worse than letting someone die
- 42.
Cetaceans should be granted legal rights
For
- Cetaceans do deserve rights. You may just say that cetaceans are just like any other animal, however, they're actually very intelligent because: They can recognize themselves in a mirror and are one of the only animals who can do that. Their brains are almost as big as humans…
- I believe that we should grant rights to cetaceans. What are Cetaceans? Cetaceans are whales & dolphins. Why should we grant rights to them? Whaling had begun hundreds of years ago by the Japanese and was soon found in many other countries. A whaling technique that is used is…
Against
- I believe I have proven the despicable nature of these water dwelling fiends, and while I complement my opponent on her prose with the English Language, I strongly disagree with her world view of putting sea cows on par with human beings. Never forget the Tale of Moby Dick, and…
- I will be rebutting everything that has been said and then re-affirming and developing my points, which pretty much all still stand.Cetaceans still don't deserve rightsBasically pro has quoted a bunch of sources saying that these water-dwelling beasts can be taught a few tricks…
- 43.
Accepting a gift is never morally wrong
For
- In response to "SAT-Car Example" As I clarified in Round 2, "the car" does not qualify as a gift if it is contingent upon the fact that the receiver had gotten perfect score on the SAT. It would be more of a reward, which makes it contractual. Also if this act of receiving the…
- Counter-Arguments: While we established that it a true gift does not require a return, and indeed, the return is not even wanted, that does not mean that the favor should not or could not be returned. If my friend buys me dinner and does not expect me to buy him one back, I…
Against
- My opponent states that it is not the acceptance of a gift that is wrong but the intent the receiver has. I would agree that the intent is wrong and there is nothing inherently wrong with accepting a gift. In his situation, a man cheats in SATs, lies to his parents and they…
- 2. I would like to first clarify my position in this debate. I am the Con of "It is never wrong to accept a gift"; therefore I argue this statement is not true " this thus implies I believe "It is sometimes wrong to accept a gift". Following this, any admission that sometimes…
- 44.
Animals should be kept in zoos
For
- First of all when I mean its ok to kill animals I mean its ok to kill but humans should limit the amount they kill because humans are also part of the food chain and they have to kill some animals but they should only kill a few not a lot that they will become extinct. I will…
- Animals must be kept in zoos for many reasons and here are why 1. Many animals are becoming exstinct from poachers and have been traded or selled at black markets and black markets sell illigel items animals in the other hand must be kept safe from harm of harmful poachers.…
Against
- My opponent says that: First of all when I mean its ok to kill animals I mean its ok to kill but humans should limit the amount they kill because humans are also part of the food chain and they have to kill some animals but they should only kill a few not a lot that they will…
- To attack my opponent case: He said: 1. Many animals are becoming exstinct from poachers and have been traded or selled at black markets and black markets sell illigel items animals in the other hand must be kept safe from harm of harmful poachers. About zoos not letting…
- 45.
Dressing cats in costumes is morally justified
For
- Yep. Cat pumpkins are ok.
- The def. for morality in this case is "conformity to the rules of right conduct". What constitutes "right conduct" always presupposes an over-arching context. The proposition is in the context of these contexts. 1. The Con is easily refuted here when we refer to the Hebrew…
Against
- The preliminary challenge I wish to issue against the proposition is a concise definition of what constitutes 'morally justified'. It seems the opposition has given a litany of examples of possible appeals to proximate religico-philosophical domains, but no coherent argument…
- 46.
Buying stolen goods is morally wrong
For
- The topic is this: Buying something that is stolen from someone else is bad. The topic is not about adopting children. My opponents argument is about adopting children wich has nothing to do with the topic. Therefore, what my opponent said is irrelevant and my opponent did not…
- Because buying a stolen item encourages the thieves and / or their partners in crimes might make them think that stealing is good.
Against
- The point I was trying to get across was that just because you buy something doesn't mean that you agree with what the seller is doing . don't try and call topicality on me I was giving you another real life situation so you can get the fact that the argument you brought up was…
- Just because you buy a stolen item from someone does not mean you encourage it, people adopt kids all the time, it doesn't mean they encouraged parents putting their kids up for adoption.
- 47.
Animals should not be kept in captivity
For
- Merry Christmas To define captivity http://www.merriam-webster.com... ' To be imprisoned of chained' Showed in this link above. I agree with you that it does help breed but I am going to say animal captivity is not good for animals in our environment shall I begin my refutes.…
- This is my first debate so I want to do well and have a good one also rules to debating Challenger/opponent no trolling no plagiarizing off another plagiarizing means to copy something from someone else's work No rude language Voters/commenters Vote for who you think matches…
Against
- I have nothing to reply to
- Ok So what my opponent does not understand is that my argument is in no way debating the fact that animals are treated well, I base my argument on the fact of the greater good. The fact that animals being kept in captivity are being treated horribly is not the case of the…
- 48.
Feeding the hungry is a moral duty of wealthy nations
For
- What a jerk. If you were hungry uyou'd want food. Next time you catch this hunger illness I'll be the first to watch you fade away like the guy in Thinner. ~BOOM HEADSHOT~
- We need to feed the hungry because they are America's workforce.
Against
- ::Ad Hominems:: 1.1"What a jerk." 1.2."Next time you catch this hunger illness I'll be the first to watch you fade away like the guy in Thinner." 1.3."~BOOM HEADSHOT~" ::Misspellings:: 1.1" uyou'd" ::Arguments:: "If you were hungry uyou'd want food" 1.1. Unless I was on a diet…
- ::My argument:: There is this great Chinese proverb and it says: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." My opponent proposes to give a fish to those who need food. I say give them jobs and education hence a bright…
- 49.
Zoos should be banned
For
- According to The Guardian, police have been accused of unnecessarily shooting many of the animals. They were also seen by zoo staff taking selfies beside lions, tigers and other large animals they had shot. "I couldn't believe what I was seeing," one worker said. "It was like a…
- It said that the animals are kept in an enclosure way so they dont allow their lives to be live in a natural way. Plus the animals are sad and lonely kept in a cage where there friends are not by them. source http://www.veganpeace.com...
Against
- Well actually the animals are with family.
- But zoos save the animals and restore them back to health, for example Brook field zoo saved 2 baby bears from the wild because their mother died and they wouldn't have survived without their mother. Brook field zoo still have those bears today. So at least Brook field zoo…
- 50.
Animals should be protected from cruelty
For
- My opponent has forfeited the previous round however I will provide a conclusion. Animal cruelty for joy causes the animal to hurt unacceptably, which is very cruel. Imagine you were the animal how would you feel? You would be begging to escape from the cruel treatment. Also,…
- The first wave of farm related genocide would be the use of pesticides. Pesticides have been linked to the death of ~30% of the US honey bee population.Next, heavy equipment will crush the life out of a legion insects and rodents.Thousands of animals will die for you to have a…
Against
- My apologies for the forfeit. I was busy yesterday. Will be tonight too so this is all im posting.
- Lets extrapolate from the idea of becoming a vegetarian for ethical reasons. Since the capacity for pain is equal, consider all animal life equal in this example. The first wave of farm related genocide would be the use of pesticides. Pesticides have been linked to the death of…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?