Environment Debate Topics for Students — page 7
529 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 301.
Coal should be banned from energy production
For
- I stated that using coal for energy production is the biggest source of CO2 emissions in the US. This information is correct as is yours about cars being the largest source of air pollution in general in the entire world. I'm glad we established that car emissions are globally…
- Addressing P1: The use of coal in energy production results in the most carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States (1.7 billion tons per year). It is also responsible for acid rain, smog and toxic air pollution through emissions of other dangerous substances including…
Against
- Coal isn't the biggest source of pollution if there are a billion cars on the road emitting hazardous gases. As I stated before, coal makes up forty to fifty percent of our energy source, if we invest into cleaning coal it can be a major global discovery. America has an…
- Cars are the biggest source of air pollution, all the exhaust emissions that come from these vehicles destroy the ozone layer. "Fossil fuel combustion, particularly as it occurs in motor vehicles, has been identified as the LARGEST contributor to air pollution in the WORLD."…
- 302.
Developing countries should prioritize environmental protection over resource extraction
For
- Lame, extend.
- C1: Negating the Resolution would Promote Violence a) resource extraction increases violence Resource extraction ultimately ends up being linked to violence; the reason they are linked is because armed violence is often connected to the foundation of resource extraction, as…
Against
- Since the argument is set up that their is no other possible alternative: Developing countries OUGHT NOT to prioritize environmental protection over resource extraction. Developing nations need security. Developing nations are vulnerable to attack from stronger nations and thus…
- I would like my opponent to be familiar with the forms of Lincoln-Douglas debate, with a proper value structure. Also, the full resolution to be debated is: When in conflict, developing countries ought to prioritize environmental protection over resource extraction. PLEASE NOTE…
- 303.
Human activity should be held responsible for accelerating animal extinction
For
- the world is evolving and in this race we have forget about the animals who live or lived with us we killed them all for our benefits, it seems to be alright but it has had a huge impact on our environment upto 150-200 species go extinct because of human created problems such…
Against
- Pro is obviously conceding. I yield my time to expedite the voting round.
- I'm guessing that we didn't need Four Rounds. The pro is conceding.
- 304.
Global warming is exaggerated and politically motivated
For
- CO2 was just named a greenhouse gas in a 2006 court case, which to me was a very sketchy hearing. (Besides the fact that Al Gore was making back room deals to get this law passed.) My bad, I meant methane not propane. And it is a fact. "A United Nations report has identified…
- "Twelve-month long drop in world temperatures wipes out a century of warming. Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded. -China has its coldest winter in 100 years. -Baghdad sees its first snow in all recorded history. -North America has the most…
Against
- One doesn't name CO2 a greenhouse gas. The 2006 court case you are referring to was to force the EPA to do their job and fight pollution. The nature of greenhouse gases isn't a political one it's a product of the actual physical characteristics of the gas.…
- * 2007 tied for the hottest year on record. http://www.giss.nasa.gov... Your argument was largely cut and pasted from: http://www.dailytech.com... Global Warming is a general global heating trend, whereas Climate Change is changes in climate due to global warming. Heat changes…
- 305.
Deepwater offshore drilling is in the best interest of the United States
For
- Con has resigned from the debate he started.
- Thanks to Con for an interesting topic and timely debate. Every year 30,000 people in the United States die in automobile accidents. Autos pollutes and consume valuable resources. So shouldn't we ban automobiles immediately? No, of course we should not. The advantage of…
Against
- See comments
- We the con believe that offshore oil drilling is not in the best interests of the united states. Offshore oil drilling is destroying our delicate ecosystem. Additionally, at the same time it is causing our economy to plummet. Offshore drilling also destroys the overall health…
- 306.
Global warming is mostly caused by human activity
For
- 1. Correlation CON essentially says a robust correlation does not increase the chance for causation, only the relationship. However, for this correlation to be robust is has to precede the warming (or, in others, amplify them). In this debate I have not said CO2 is the only…
- 1. Correlation and Causation My opponent's main argument is that correlation is not equal to causation, and I totally agree. However, some degree of correlation is needed to prove causation. The more robust the correlation, the more likely some causation exists. I have provided…
Against
- Correlation Deception First off I did not ignore Pro's study I rebutted it with a more recent study, which was much more extensive than the study provided by Pro. This false accusation is a weak attempt to deceive the voters. Furthermore, while Pro has not claimed CO2 was the…
- Correlation and Causation Pro claims, "The more robust the correlation, the more likely some causation exists." This is blatantly false. The stronger the correlation the stronger the relationship, but it does not prove one thing caused the other. In order to prove causation,…
- 307.
Free-market anarchy would benefit the natural environment
For
- Are you inferring that legal systems can only originate from governments?, are you in fact not aware of merchant law, or private courts? Both these things are only to do with private systems. Merchant law was made in the middle ages by merchants who were interested in creating…
- Firstly I would like to say that my original topic was that environments would be better protected from destruction then they are now. I never said that they would be completely safe from destruction, only safer than they are now. All through private laws and private systems…
Against
- The basic principle of the freemarket is that if the masses want a product or a service they will get it no matter who tries and stops them. if this is what free market is, then it would have both good side and bad side. it can both enrich and pollute environment in the process…
- according to you,"If the ocean was to be divided up and be owned by many different people, pollution whilst, would be allowed to be dumped on one persons lot of ocean, could be sued if the pollution they dumped drifted onto someone elses lot of ocean." for example, if, say…
- 308.
The Earth is not overpopulated
For
- I. OvercrowdingSix acres is clearly enough room for a person and the animals inhabiting his surrounding environment to be at peace. The addition of one person into an ecosystem that size is hardly going to be an issue. In addition, consider my other statistic that each person…
- It seems my opponent has misunderstood his burden. This debate is not about whether certain cities or countries are overpopulated. It is more broad than that. It is about whether the entire Earth is overpopulated. Thus, my opponent's burden is greater than simply showing that…
Against
- I will provide my defense, and head onto to the voting period. Thanks for the debate! !! DefenseBurdensPro says that I misunderstood my burden. Pro says that it is not about some cities overpop. , it is about the whole world overpopulated. The definiton of the debate is…
- I will post my rebuttals in the debate, and not post any defense of my case. BurdensThe Burdens are that I have to prove one part of the Earth overcrowded, with all animals, etc. DefinitonsThis isn't really an argument. It is just an expand of the definitons, and the basic…
- 309.
People in wealthy nations should stop eating meat
For
- Meat is detrimental to human health because of the cholesterol, too much fat, saturated fat, heterocyclic amines, and bacteria which release endotoxins. A plant based diet has fiber, antioxidants, and phytonutrients also know as phytochemicals. Cholesterol even in small amounts…
- "First Without meat The energy levels of us humans will be relitivly low." Dr.DownsThis is a claim without a warrant, and thus a bare assertion. I have no idea why my opponent claims that humans would have low energy levels without meat. Thus, I have nothing to rebut. I will…
Against
- You sound like you know what you are talking about but what you just said was the dumbest thing i have ever read. I just got aids by reading it. Meat is a better source for energy, that is just a fact and im not talking about deer i am talking about every animal to ever live…
- First Without meat The energy levels of us humans will be relitivly low. Now i do agree that everyone shout be eating some more greens but that is what the dank is for. Without meat How will us humans grow and continue to thrive throughout the first world countries. The…
- 310.
The world should switch to solar energy
For
- You should know that earth based solar panels are not the only method of solar energy. There have been designs for a bell shaped satellite that is completely made of solar panels in geosynchronous orbit. This satellite can be adjusted so that it is in sunlight for all but 44…
- I don't want anybody to think that I am trying to destroy the world, but there are some people out there who think solar energy is evil. I can almost guarantee you that they don't live in China or Mexico. If you think this is evil and I work for the government or claim…
Against
- Cost is an extremely important factor when regarding energy, and orbiting solar panels are an unnecessary expense that both public and private sectors will have to pay. Panels in space deteriorate eight times faster than on earth, and repairing/replacing them would expose the…
- 'Going solar' is most definitely not the way to go regarding the whole world's energy use, there being other ways to utilise the natural energy around us and considering different places have weather patterns. The most popular and commonly used method of energy generation is by…
- 311.
The US ban on incandescent light bulbs was a good decision
For
- Rebuttal against my case: I would like to begin this round by obviously pointing out that my opponent had no time to actually rebut my case, but sort of make a case of his own, so for the time being, we can just extend my case across the flow. However, the solitary contention…
- Before continuing, I would like to point out that the ban on incandescent light bulbs refers to the clause in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 that bans incandescent light bulbs without a 25% increase in efficiency from production, importation, and marketing.…
Against
- To begin I would like to apologize for taking so long. Was busy, and needed to educate myself a little more on this subject. I would also like to ask my opponent to not vote for this debate. That is allNow to finish my argument.Brightness: I'm not sure if I am the only one, but…
- I will not be countering my opponents main argument so far and here is why: I completely understand that this ban will save energy, and, though I personally do not believe in Man-Made Global Warming, I understand it will help the environment, at least in energy saved. I do not…
- 312.
Motorcycles should be required to be quieter
For
- Most people have their radio blasting while driving or have the news on and can't hear motor cyclists. Modern cars are also so well insulated for engine and road noise that they block out motorcycle's engine sounds unless the motor cyclists is right beside the car and by then…
- I live down town. Every summer these guys with the Harley Davidson's come rolling through and gearing down or revving up. These bikes are way louder than any car. They should be restricted to lower volume levels. Noise pollution is real. Might feel good to blast down the…
Against
- First of all, if you want to live in an apartment in a big city, the nit is your choice to hear motorcycles all night. And if you can hear motorcycles, then you can hear cars too. People have a right to get where they need to go. You know, you may not think about it over all of…
- It is too often that you hear of a motorcycle accident on the highway or busy road outside a city. And why, you might ask, would motorcycles be so prone to accidents? This because they are so small. The cars around them are much larger and more protected. If motorcycles were…
- 313.
The government should intervene in the transition to alternative fuels
For
- you really didn't even address the substance of my argument: ie, that intervening would be economically benefical compared to doing nothing. only tangentally barely did you touch on it... all you did was show an example of where intervening is bad, ie with the gov subsidies to…
- why the government should intervene more with alternative fuel. people say the market will take care of itself. in the end, it will. but at what cost in the mean time? we should act now because we'll look back and see how much we've wasted on gasoline. companies say they can…
Against
- You don't grasp the problems with socialist calculation. It is impossible. All government intervention is inevitably counterproductive. You agree that government should remove subsidies from the oil companies. Do you also agree it should remove its anti-capitalist extended…
- You agree that "the market" will take care of our energy problems "in the end," but question "but at what cost in the mean time?" The fact is that it is current government intervention that prevents the development of affordable alternative-energy sources right now. Oil,…
- 314.
Deep water offshore oil drilling should be allowed
For
- We the pro agree with the resolution Resolved: Allowing deep water offshore oil drilling is in the best interest of the United States. We offer the following definitions Allowing-to permit From Merriam Webster dictionary Best Interest- Authority delegated for taking any action…
Against
- My opponent has conceded that deep water offshore oil drilling will be our apocalypse.
- Offshore drilling causes nuclear warfare and will lead to the extinction of humanity.
- 315.
We should seriously plan for next-generation farming
For
- 1) Con exceeds limits. 2) Con fixates on H & N. 3) Con also fixates on Empire 4) Con does not attempt to address the basis of the debate. 5) Con does not attempt to address any of the practicalities of next generation farming. 6) Con subverts. 7) Con seeks to introduce their…
- Empire is a concept to which we apply mental imagery and come up with an assumption. An NGO. Is just the same. Which do we assume is the more sinister? Concepts vary as a result of individual programming. (Currently problematic) The reality is; social organisation must be…
Against
- You are voting Con in this debate for 3 reasons 1. They concede that you should reject them for supporting the Empire 2. They concede that all of their impacts are inevitable in the world of the Empire this means that they don"t get any advantage of doing their plan 3. They…
- To address the claim that an NGO would just become part of the Empire. Hardt and Negri would never conclude than an NGO used in direct opposition to Empire would be bad. However for the sake of this debate so it does not get confusing, I will not be extending the Counter Plan.…
- 316.
The US government should fund alternative energy technology development
For
- Bats do play a very important part of the ecosystem worldwide. Would another species be able to fill in the gap? It's possible. Back to the debate at hand though, the US government has the funds (after some fiscally conservative changes to the current budget) (.…
- My opponent has brought forth a very interesting (and timely) debate topic. Our country stands on the brink of recession, possibly even minor depression. My opponent's views are that the government cannot afford to fund these projects. I assume the reason is that the government…
Against
- My opponent says that programs such as welfare and medicare/aid are programs that we can just throw out the door, but he forgets, the constitution of the United states requires the government to ensure domestic tranquility, and promote the general welfare. And by getting rid of…
- My opponent brings up a good point, my information was wrong. Unfortunatly I read my source wrong and the source comes from a 1998 Danish wind farms average. Since technology in the last decade has become much more advanced, this number is wrong, and I would like to apologize…
- 317.
Human-caused global warming is a hoax
For
- I personally am for the fact that man-made global warming does not exist, and that the earth is simply going through an ice age. Let me explain, an ice age goes through two phases. The first one is the obvious "freezing" phase and the second phase is a predominantly warm…
- I will be arguing that "global warming" is a hoax. Round One: Respond ONLY with "I accept" or you will be thrown out of the debate. Round Two: Opening Statements only, NO REBUTTALS or you will be thrown out of the debate. Round Three: Arguments AND rebuttals Round Four: " "…
Against
- I'm away at the moment, and my opponent may be busy. For this round, I'll extend my previous arguments. Back to you.
- While I'll make some general comments as to the trend of the debate, I will refrain from posting actual rebuttals until the subsequent round, as per the Instigator's rules. I am actually astounded at the position presented. I was expecting graphs, tables and data. Instead, we…
- 318.
Stopping fossil fuel use is the only way to fight global warming
For
- 1. Your comment about climateange existing before humans exsted is too general and it doesn't negate the fact that we to havea part that plays into the climate phenomenon. Ultimately, we are the most corrosive being on this planet--and this is a fact no one can deny. We distroy…
- I think making fossil fuel FREE is the solution. Why, the whole issue started because of greed, not fossil fuel itself!
Against
- Dear pro your opinion is always accepted so please post something.
- Let me explain to you about the economies which will be affected if the use of fossil fuel is banned 1) India and china are one of the developing nation of the world. They require fossil fuel for the factories made by foreign products companies and many local companies,…
- 319.
Genetically modified crops should be banned
For
- There is no longer any legitimate, scientific defense of growing GM crops for human consumption. The only people still clinging to the outmoded myth that "GMOs are safe" are scientific mercenaries with financial ties to Monsanto and the biotech industry.GMOs are an anti-human…
- Definitions as said by dictionary. com Illegal: forbidden by law or statute. Crops: the cultivated produce of the ground, while growing or when gathered: the wheat crop. GMO: Genetically modified organism GMO is sick!
Against
- Arguments extended.
- As Pro bears the BOP, all that I must do is overturn his reasons for making GMO Crops illegal. This should not be a difficult process as there is very little actual argument to refute; most of his case is made up of fallacious appeals to emotion and other logical fallacies,…
- 320.
Population growth makes environmental protection pointless
For
- Water , oil and food are all finite and should be protected. However, the population of this Planet will soon exhaust all of these in its demands .The Elephant in the room is shouting but no one can here it. 9 billion people will soon be here. Don't bother about the future.…
- Thank you for partly agreeing with my argument in that the future situation might be terrible but that us human beans will survive , though in smaller numbers. My point is why should I bother about any ecological , environmental fussing when we are all heading off to Hell in a…
Against
- Food is not finite because it can be grown and reproduced. Oil is finite but there are very many other sources of energy that could be used. Water is finite but is "recycled" by nature and fresh water can be filtered out of the oceans. There are millions of acres of fertile…
- Green ideas are not limited to recycling and we are arguing about other environmental things as well. My point stands that in order for ANYONE to survive, we need resources, and the environment is resources. If we put no effort into conserving our environment, then there is no…
- 321.
Oil companies should pay full reparations for environmental disasters
For
- I rest my case.
- Clearly my opponent has no respect for this debate. the fact that the spill has been capped means nothing to the thousands that have already been put out of work and the hundreds of animals that have been killed by this oil spill. As my opponent pointed out, this spill lasted…
Against
- My oppoent obviously does not watch C-SPAN or the news to hear that today after 87 days their is no more oil leaking into the gulf.
- BP Should not because of the fact that it is the fault of the Interior and Energy secretary for not doing their job as per the oath of office. These secretarys should have notified Congress and then congress should have supenoa BP. Secondly it is the fault of the Worker who…
- 322.
Global warming is primarily caused by humans
For
- The greenhouse effect: The phenomenon whereby the earth's atmosphere traps solar radiation, caused by the presence in the atmosphere of gases such as carbon dioxide, water vapor, and methane that allow incoming sunlight to pass through but absorb heat radiated back from the…
- I will take the pro position that global warming does in fact occur as a man made phenomenin and that there is sufficient evidence to back this claim up. Definitions: Global warming: an increase in the earth's atmospheric and oceanic temperatures widely predicted to occur due…
Against
- Well, he forfieted. So you can extend all my previous arguments 1. The evidence used for anthroprogenic warming is fundamentally flawed. Moreover, this theory doesnt explain the long trend of th past 150 years. Prefer my evidence is encompasses a larger view than my opponents…
- For this round I'm gonna present all my major evidence, and then in the next speech try and piece the puzzles together in context of my opponent. But a lot of my evidence is directly responsive anyway. 1. No credible evidence for anthroprogenic warming Singer, professor at…
- 323.
Nuclear energy should be the primary alternative energy source
For
- I will makes my comments on your argument by corresponding them with the same template. 1a) I have already made my point on the use of solar and wind. They are more of a small scale energy. One wind turbine cost 1,000,000 dollars. A farm of 100 would cost 130,000,000 dollars.…
- Nuclear energy should be used as a primary source of energy for many reasons. Costs being one of them. Nuclear energy costs 2 cents per Kilowatt-hour. This is a fraction compared to the other sources of energy. Oil being 18 cents Per KWh and gas being around 8 cents Per kWh.…
Against
- Same format as above: 1a) Obviously wind farms take up much land, but the U.S has excessive land that we do not use mostly in the desert where there are plenty of wind. http://hubpages.com... Solar power plants work 24/7 even in cloudy conditions. http://www.grist.org...…
- Map: rebuttal then con's case. Clarifications: Nuclear energy: energy derived from nuclear power-plants Primary source: significantly increase of use. Alternative Energy: any energy sources except for coal and oil. 1a) Energy from the wind only cost .2c cents/kWh. This is…
- 324.
Human population growth is a serious threat to the environment
For
- I hate to see you go, but I love to watch you leave. - Castor Troy Well I hope you come back to the site.
- I shoulda made mashed potatoes
Against
- without reducing rapid population growth , it will be impossible to solve the worlds global challenges Agree, Disagree,or Neutral? Tell me why
- 325.
Recycling paper is an effective way to fight climate change
For
- 1. You said all other things being equal, if we follow this we are turning this into a completely hypothetical debate, and means this debate would serve no purpose, it would be totally pointless. You have to consider reality. The impact of recycling simply is not that great on…
- Recycling paper is a good way to fight climate change. I. The affirmative is wrong in that recycling decreases demand for paper. 1. The demand for paper is constantly rising as the population rises. 2. At worst, reycling would cause no more commercial forests to be planted (and…
Against
- zarul: "I. The affirmative is wrong in that recycling decreases demand for paper. 1. The demand for paper is constantly rising as the population rises." me: Notice I said all other things being equal. But I said nothing about whether or not aggregate demand has increased, just…
- Recycled paper is artificially supported by the government. When this source of paper competes with paper that comes from trees, it pushes the demand for tree farming down. To compensate, tree farmers have to lower prices. This lowers profits margins, and as such, firms leave…
- 326.
Global warming is primarily the result of human activity
For
- i define the topic to mean: globel warming over the past few decades is a result of human activity. so there
Against
- I'm disappointed that my opponent wasn't able to respond.
- I hold my previous statement. Hi Wheelhouse! ...Guess what... Invest in gold, statistics show that Gold is going to rise by 150%, so hop on the hot air balloon now, b/c when it takes off your never gonna reach it. 100c 100c 100c
- 327.
The US should require a national renewable electricity standard
For
- RES will cause electricity to rise only slightly, then decline.
- Renewable energy standard ensures market certainty for clean energy
Against
- A national renewable energy standard will increase electricity costs
- Renewable Energy Standard increases energy prices, kills jobs
- 328.
Oil should not be used for electricity production and transportation fuel
For
- Extend.
- Extend arguments. CON's statement 'haha ohh. Well yay>' doesn't make sense to me because (s)he lost.
Against
- haha ohh. Well yay>
- I accept. "there are many alternatives to oil that are much healthier for the community." ^^^thesis^^^
- 329.
Governments need to take radical action to combat climate change
For
- They can do both. Anyway even if we disagree over what kind of government action should be taken that doesn"t matter because both count as radical government action so you"re not even disagreeing with the title of the debate.
- yes it does. Correct. What is your point?
Against
- https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=d1vSlNz0PaA
- You feel the government should regulate while I feel the government should, In lack of a better term, "unsubsidize" corporations.
- 330.
Global environmental issues should be the top priority
For
- Global warming has been a growing problem over the decade, and with our destruction of forests, use of factories and pollution has undoubtedly contributed to it. As my opponent has stated, it will be his burden to prove that there are other priorities other than the…
Against
- Unfortunately my opponent wasn't able to post their rebuttal.
- The pro is arguing that the most important issue currently facing the world is related to its environment. I will be giving several examples of important world issues. If I can prove that at least one of these examples is more important than the world environment I have…
- 331.
The Grand Inga Dam should be built
For
- Will enable the rebuilding of DRC
- The dam would power Africa
Against
- Dams displace communities
- Such a big project is beyond DRC's capacity
- 332.
US law should require all cars to run on alternative fuels by 2040
For
- 1. Helps fight global Warming. Environmental Defense 2003. Our light trucks and cars contribute more to global warming than 190 other countries. 2. Nano-solar technology is a viable option, it runs at 80 % efficiency only way to be better is having your car be a nuclear power…
Against
- ...and that's the round.
- Okay, so just extend all of my arguments here...
- 333.
Human activity is largely responsible for global warming
For
- 1: Does Global Warming exist?Yes, but how do we know? The amount of evidence is compelling and indisputable from the rising global sea level to global temperature rise, warming oceans, to shrinking ice sheets. Other ways we know that global warming exists includes but is not…
- Global Warming is likely impacted by humans.
Against
- Thank you for reading.
- Thank you for that last round. 1. While a rise in global temperature is undeniable, I disagree that the greenhouse effect is the cause. I repeat my original point that the recent warming of the Earth has to do with solar cycles and that a 2013 study proved that the rising…
- 334.
Grazing cattle is seriously harming the environment
For
- http://beef.unl.edu... - (relink) I would be more than happy to evidence and elaborate on my statements. http://www.news.cornell.edu... http://www.cowspiracy.com... "livestock"s contribution to environmental problems is on a massive scale" United Nations An organisation such as…
- Whist I acknowledge all of the points you have made. In particularly the quote from wbur.org, let us not confuse the issue. I do not support veganism for the population, I believe meat is an important part of our diet, as it has been for as long as we have known. The…
Against
- "I do indeed suggest that certain methods of cattle production are more eco-friendly than their counterparts. I propose that sustainable production can be achieved through pastoral production in oppose to industrial." Pro This seems to contradict the topic. It seems you are…
- First link of yours didn't work. "I would end this by asking is it sustainable or moral that we grow more grain and sanitise more water for cattle than we do for ourselves. (humans)" Pro While the above may be true, would you mind proving an outside link? "The modern methods…
- 335.
Private cars should be banned
For
- In my arguments here I have established a great deal of harm caused by our car-culture in the United states. Here I have given a good deal of reasons why cars should be done away with in our culture.
- (1)So convience is more important than say... having a habitable planet to live on.http://www.ucsusa.org...; http://www.epa.gov...; http://www.epa.gov...; https://www.fueleconomy.gov...; I will keep in mind what a convience it is to be driving a mini van away from rising ocean…
Against
- REBUTTALI cannot access any of the links you have given. For example when I try to open http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov... an error occurs. As the character limit is 2000, I cannot post the error in my argument, but I will post it in the comments.So convenience is more important…
- REBUTTALYou are basing your argument on nothing. No resources - No data... Carbon monoxide punch? What are you talking about? -- Did you read any of the links I posted? Even one of them in its entirety? http://www.abe.iastate.edu... Relaxation? Are you tripping on something?The…
- 336.
Compact fluorescent lightbulbs are bad for humanity
For
- The first, minor point I want to make is that these CFL bulbs are not brighter, I know several people who substituted supposedly equivalent CFL's for incandescents and have noted that they are much dimmer and take an irritatingly long time to come to full brightness. The major…
- I read your comment on my debate with socialpinko: I am willing to engage in a debate on CFL bulbs with the 8000 character limit. My first argument is that since these light bulbs contain mercury, they are profoundly harmful to the environment and to human health. Other than…
Against
- "The first, minor point I want to make is that these CFL bulbs are not brighter, I know several people who substituted supposedly equivalent CFL's for incandescents and have noted that they are much dimmer and take an irritatingly long time to come to full brightness." Given…
- Since this is a two round debate, I will make my arguments in R1, and attempt to refute Pro's R2 arguments in my R2. Since I am Con, and defending against the claim that CFLs are "bad for humanity," there is not a lot of arguing I can do this round, but I will address that they…
- 337.
Humanity should convert to vegetarianism on moral and sustainability grounds
For
- its obvious that the mass of civilisation is divorded from the morals of Killing. We buy our bacon, steaks,chicken breasts and mince neatly packaged from the foos store. We dont even know its animals killed inside these neat little packages, in the sense that we dont ever have…
- hope you take me upon the challenge,
Against
- As my opponent has forfeited this round which is the last one, I feel it would be unfair for me to present a new argument he would be unable to reply to. I would really appreciate any feedback anyone could give me, as this was my first debate.
- Firstly, I would like to argue that eating animals is not immoral. Humans were not meant to be vegetarian, as seen in the fact that we posses canine teeth which are meant to help us consume flesh easier. Also, there are organizations such as the American Humane Association and…
- 338.
Nuclear power is a reasonable way to generate electricity
For
- Defense of my arguments: 1) Environmental. Nuclear waste is not as dangerous as fossil fuel waste. There are different types of radioactive wastes, most forms are low level waste produce that decay in a matter of hours or days.[1] The waste that can't be recycled is sealed in…
- Nuclear energy is a reasonable approach to generating electricity based on the fact that it is far superior to most forms of power generating methods currently in use. Nuclear fission plants have been shown to be more: a) Environmentally friendly. b) Sustainable. c) Economical.…
Against
- Firstly rebuttal: Nuclear energy is not environmentally friendly at all in the sense that the waste produced from a nuclear plant is so much more dangerous that waste produced by Fossil fuel plants. The radioactive material stays radioactive for a very long time. And it is very…
- Yep, good luck.
- 339.
Developing countries should prioritize environmental protection over resource extraction
For
- Value- Morality Criterion- Kant's Categorical Imperative Theory Contention 1- Governments have moral obligation to their people Developing countries do not know always where to start putting their money and time into, this is why the United Nations made eight primary goals that…
- Although a short one, thanks for the debate.
Against
- Extend my arguments. As the only one with unrebutted offense, I ask you to vote Con. Thank you!
- Extend my arguments.
- 340.
Modern green conveniences create more pollution than they prevent
For
- What the eff? Did you learn something, and then decide to quit?
- Apparently you did not understand my position as your argument mirrors my own. The supposed green folks wish to destroy your old jalopy and replace it with a new shiny slave, the slave being you, that is completely unable to feed your own horse. Thanks for taking this, as no…
Against
- Your argument is modern vehicles cause more pollution than before. Which is flat out incorrect. Then you try and say I have been agreeing with you? Where is your rebuttle arguement? Where is any of the facts to support the blah you spout?.
- Lets start with the construction of the vehicle because that is where the majority of the pollution is released. The vehicles are made of metal. This metal has to be refined and strengthened. Every step through the refining process releases mass amounts of toxins. Once the…
- 341.
Access to drinking water should be a human right, not a commodity
For
- Dang, I really wanted to debate that pragmatism case xDNow I gotta go research a bunch of Levinas xDEthics of the Other, yay!
- Yeah, so just don't vote on this debate xD
Against
- I've only seen one other case like mine, so you won't have to worry that much about going against one, but it's sooooooo epic!
- Vote for Pedro!
- 342.
The US should adopt a carbon tax
For
- The debate will use the "opt-in" voting standards outlined here. [http://www.debate.org...] First round acceptance only. BOP is shared.
- I hope everything is fine with my opponent, seeing as they have forfeited.
Against
- Ok let's see how this goes (fake swagger) lets see if I can somehow pull this off.
- Dude I forfeited, it happens sorry, anyways I concede the debate
- 343.
The United States should significantly expand nuclear energy use
For
- Onto my points. 1. As I've shown, nuclear energy is able to get more 'bang for our buck' in an environmental sense, in that it is able to create a substantial energy output, at a very low environmental impact. The potential for a serious nuclear waste leak, while always…
- Okay so, I'm gonna run my PF case, since I didn't get to today on the actual tournament. Nuclear Energy needs to be substantially increased in the United States of America, heres why. 1.Relatively environmentally friendly 2.Economically Sound 3.Safe 1.Nuclear Power plants are…
Against
- My opponent has resolved that the USA should significantly increase its use of nuclear energy. To support his resolution he has claimed that nuclear energy is relatively environmentally friendly, economically sound and safe. In have presented a rebuttal of my opponent's…
- I regret that my opponent is disappointed with my debating style. However, should he wish for a different style debate, it might have been useful for him to stipulate so in his opening post and I would have been more than happy to oblige. There are many things I am but mind…
- 344.
Zoos should be abolished
For
- Not all zoos can be sizes of savannas so they must rationalize the amount of space given to each animal. So you must understand if a leopard can't get 12-30 sq. miles of space. But, zoos do have to divide that space rationally." No, not all zoos can be sizes of savannas, that's…
- "it's a different experience when you see an animal up close. " From my own experiences I'm most often unable to see the animals. They are often either hiding from the noisy screaming people flashing pictures, or there home is so small they have to choice to sit there are be…
Against
- Cruelty If there is one thing I can't stand, it has to be cruelty in general. Cruelty is unacceptable towards humans and animals. When I see commercials about animal cruelty, I always tell myself who has such a cruel heart that they could do that to an animal? Some zoos have…
- Not all zoos can be sizes of savannas so they must rationalize the amount of space given to each animal. So you must understand if a leopard can't get 12-30 sq. miles of space. But, zoos do have to divide that space rationally. God also told us in Genesis 1:26-28 that we have…
- 345.
Global warming is a hoax
For
- Well scientists are notrius for lying and being sinful and decetful, they have come with lies like evolution, the big bang, homosexuality being natural, the atom, etc. I couldn't tell you why, perhaps it is to pander to the unfaithful, perhaps it is just so they can continue to…
- 1) My first point is a bit abstract here so bare with me. The thought that humans can have such a huge impact on the environment is really arrogant and self centered in my onion. Humans are only capable of doing so much to the world around us. Major things like the climate and…
Against
- Humans have been dramatically evolving over the last tens of thousands of years. From stone tools to bronze, bronze tools to iron swords, to wooden boats with sails, to motorized boats. We have electricity, which has benefited us largely. How shouldn't that be hurting for the…
- I've accepted this challenge. Let's have some fun.
- 346.
Global warming is a man-made problem
For
- Ok, so I had an excessive amount of work to do and completely did not have time to post round two. Had my opponent extended arguments or done anything in his last speech he would have easily won the round. But since we both didn't do anything round two/part of round three, this…
- I will start off by giving a resolutional overview, give my case and address my opponents case. RESOLUTIONAL OVERVIEW. The resolution for this round is as following: Resolved: That Global Warming is a manmade problem. The pro burden in this round is clearly defined, show that…
Against
- I have nothing to say until my opponent posts his next argument. I do however have to use 100 characters, so I'll write a note saying that I have to use 100 characters.
- Okay, my opponent misinterprets my argument in his Resolution Overview. He claims that I say that global warming does not exist. To the contrary, I do not argue that the climate is getting warmer, I simply argue that it is natural for it to do so. Next, in his first contention…
- 347.
Meat, dairy, and egg production should be banned worldwide
For
- v
- Opponent has given up.
Against
- YOu suck i like this food, so it shouldnt be banned we are trying to end world hunger and you ruin it, good job kid everybody hates you.
- That was one tasty bacon cheeseburger with extra mayonnaise, but I digress. Round Three was a weak attempt by you to utterly dismiss my 'curious paragraph' on the unsubstantiated claim that 'self-domestication and living organisms are tough in general' with cherry picked quotes…
- 348.
Climate action will kill more people than it saves
For
- It is more likely than not that more people will die from famine and wars caused by restrictions made by the U.N. and environmentalists under the disguise of global warming and saving the planet. Alternative fuel sources such as ethanol are a big boondoggle and a political…
- This sight is scientific fact about hydrogen and there is not a single scientist in the world that will even think of challenging it because it is a matter of the laws of nature and physics. Hydrogen will never be used as an alternative large scale fuel source. You are being…
Against
- "http://plus10.blogspot.com...; A blog is not sufficient evidence, especially when it derives info from Wikipedia, another blog (Alternative Energy Blog), a biased coalition of taxpayers (Taxpayers for Common Sense), some link that doesn't lead anywhere (What you should be…
- Though it may be true that most alternative energy sources are duds/inefficient, this does not necessarily prove your point. You have spent the vast majority of this debate condemning the use and efficiency of alternative fuels, which I do not entirely disagree, but then again,…
- 349.
Humans are not the main cause of global warming
For
- I've learned a lot from your arguments and my own research. In this round, I will consider the objections my opponent has to my arguments. The Sun My opponent is making two mistakes. One in thermodynamics, and the other in how solar activity is measured. Solar activity is the…
- In this round, I will post arguments against an anthropogenic cause to the recent global warming, and also consider as much as I can of my opponent's argument. Arguments Against Human-Caused Global Warming There are many indicators that point to CO2 emissions not being the…
Against
- Thanks to subutai for providing an interesting and educational case for me to analyze and rebut!RebuttalsDue to the loose structure of my opponents case, rebutting it proves difficult, as his contentions are not itemized. Nevertheless, I am going to itemize the case, and then…
- Thanks to subutai for posting an excellent opening round! I'm looking forward to this debate, as I am sure it will be an interesting one!So to kick this thing off I'd like to start by providing the readers with a quick road map of my case and how I aim to negate the given…
- 350.
Global warming is primarily caused by human activity
For
- Sorry be i'm really considering conceding due to small Time frame i have to do this,but i'll give it a shot. C1: CO2 emissions Wolrdwide Co2 have increased 26% from 1990 to 2005,that a extra 10,000! tons of Co2, "In 2008, U.S. greenhouse gas emissions totaled 6,957 million…
- This debate is about Global warming existence,16kadams is arguing that global warming doesn't Exist and I to prove its Existence.Here are some parameters.1.The bird is the Word.2.All sources must be posted.3.No theories,ONLY FACTS.4.Circular logic may be used.5.The opponent…
Against
- I win :(
- I think a con vote is now just
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?