Environment Debate Topics for Students

529 debate topics, students. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

StudentsDebatePage 1 of 11

1.
The US should require all new cars to use alternative fuels by 2040
For
Thanks for continuing this debate. I must apologise...I have only minutes until the deadline expires. I am afraid, therefore, I will not have time to post an argument that his contribution deserves. Suffice to say that, my opponent made a number of valid objections to the…
I really appreciate the being given the opportunity to debate a subject that relates to my favourite interest in life – cars – and I thank Russia very much for the invitation. Now, to respond to each point in turn: 1 – My opponent made a semi-valid point that all alternative…
Against
1. I do believe that my logic about "You see the problem is that the fuels need land and transportation and finally conversion, when these factors are included there is no reduction of CO2. " stands valid, my opponent although has yet to answer this point (Please don't make…
I stand to negate the following once more (I read the agreement this time so I hope there won't be nothing I' do wrong this time): "Resolved: That, by 2040, the federal government should mandate that all new passenger vehicles and light trucks sold in the United States be…
2.
Global warming is exaggerated and largely fabricated
For
Climate temperatures have risen faster than over thousands of years in the past as Nd2400 would like you to believe readers. Let me give you a little bit of history which Nd2400 refuses to acknowledge my dear readers/voters. The Roman Warm Period, Or Roman Climatic Optimum, Has…
Climate change has happened on earth for millions of years. People like to say that humans are affecting the climate change and that earth is getting hotter, Well we have had 4 ice ages in the past, We have had dinosaurs that produced just as much heat and methane as humans…
Against
You are right. . . Earth history has showed history of cooling and warming. But you ignoring the, Fact that all these cooling and heating period take a long, Long time to take place. Literally it take ten of thousands of years to hundreds of thousands of years to change the…
This round i will only use for acceptance proposes. I will show proof that humans has increased this Global Warming process. It has in fact been proved by 97% of scientists that over the last 130 years we has created and damaged the ozone layer. So, It has increased this…
3.
Hunting whales not endangered should be allowed
For
If you are such a person, this debate is not for you and I politely ask you to not accept. In this debate we will be discussing whether or not whale hunting of whale species that are NOT endangered should be legal. There are people that are specifically against whale hunting,…
If you are such a person, this debate is not for you and I politely ask you to not accept. In this debate we will be discussing whether or not whale hunting of whale species that are NOT endangered should be legal. There are people that are specifically against whale hunting,…
Against
Extend.
extend. Vote for Me!!!
4.
Commercial whaling should be banned worldwide
For
What are you talking about I have more argument please listen to me.
Ok I admit but this whole thing is wht I was trying to tell you Thanks
Against
PRO hasn't made a single argument; the only thing he has even offered is an article from teenlink that was plagiarized -- but that he's passing off as his own argument -- in its entirety. He hasn't in any way advanced his burden of proof, and that he, in the face of his…
PRO has plagiarized. Extend.
5.
Human activity is a significant cause of global warming
For
Since many parts of our debate are really about the same topic, I will combine them and will therefore only be responding to a few of my opponent's statements. =========== Source Credibility =========== RealClimate Yes, RealClimate is a blog. However, it is not just any blog.…
Note: [x, y] indicates source y from round x. For instance, [1, 4] is aaas.org. "the affirmation must prove that humans are the main cause of GW." My burden, as I stated in round 2, is only to prove that the human effect on GW is significant: important in effect or meaning.…
Against
I will first refute my opponents' last points, and then demonstrate why the negation should win this round. "However, it is not just any blog. It is written and maintained by ten publishing climatologists [1], and is therefore more credible than the word of a single…
I will begin by addressing the issue with the statistics and numbers and then move on to the rest of the case. "I don't know where this number came from; probably from my opponent's discreditable source. According to [3, 1], human CO2 accounts for about 3% to 8% of the…
6.
The United States should promote electric vehicles
For
Thanks for accepting. My opponent has created a Burden of proof which i would be adding on to. My opponent has to find ways to prove that the government cannot financially support the promotion of electric cars and to add to his burden of proof, i would be arguing that the use…
Thanks for any potential debater Round one Introduction Round Two: Main Round Round Three: Cross examination/clash Round Four: conclusion
Against
Thanks for the debate flamebreath. Definitions Princeton's Wordnet defines: United States as the "United States government." [1] promote as "contribute to the growth of" [2] electric as "operated by electricity" [3] vehicle as "a conveyance that transports people or objects"…
Thanks for a great debate flamebreath. ==Conclusion== I'll refute what seem to be my opponent's voting issues and then move on to my own. My opponent's voting issues: 1. Promote = advertisements (from Round 3) The government doesn't need to "advertise" electric cars – the…
7.
The US should expand offshore oil drilling
For
Debating always gives me much joy, and I feel increases everyone's knowledge within certain topics. Con gave a wonderful challenge and I enjoyed reading his responses. Although I didn't mean to offend in previous rounds, I will apologize for approaching his claims with…
I will first start by attacking my opponents points, then going on to defending my own. I feel that Con has seriously misjudged Petrobras and it's potential, which I will elaborate on. But first it is important to point out that Con, on multiple occasions, agreed with the…
Against
Clarifications1. Petrobras is not a majority shareholder. His argument about unilateral control would be right, as I said, IF, this were true. Having the most shares in not having a majority of them. The very definition of majority specifies having more than half of something.…
I. ResolutionExtend the burden I established for myself in round 2. My opponent does not make any arguments against this in the debate, therefore if I provide a better alternative to the United States legalizing offshore oil drilling, I win.My opponent argues that my case…
8.
Carbon dioxide emissions cause significant ocean acidification
For
This should be an easy win. My opponent has given up already. lol
Quote - CO2, etc has caused the death of evaporation. Reply - This doesn't make any sense? Quote - Suntan lotion rarely goes that low because it is buoyant. Reply - Suntan creams are made of metallic elements. Metals are heavier than water. Studies have found trace elements of…
Against
Hello. I believe that Global warming, CO2, etc has caused the death of evaporation. Think, Oceans are dying due to coral bleaching. Suntan lotion rarely goes that low because it is buoyant. The ocean water then breaks up the sun tan lotion into normal elements of the earths…
9.
Human activity significantly contributes to global warming
For
Seeing that you have a rich source of information I can easily rebut the case. To address you examples that humans are different than dinosaurs. Not to mention the fact that during the dinosaurs time there was just 1 continent. So to end this debate my case has won because I…
Just for clarification when I say human activity I mean the activity to the addition of climate change, as you could see by the evidence I used. What level of change contributes to climate change would be the rising temperatures. Since that humans release so much C02 and…
Against
Thank you for your quick response. Your position was human activity is an addition to increased Global Warming/ Climate Change. My position was that human activity is an addition to climate change just like other species. You can say human activity contributed more global…
Thank you for your reminder that I have not given a single evidence that goes against your case. To fight against a popular belief, the odds have been against me from the beginning. You have certainly won if this was a popularity contest. What I want to say in my previous…
10.
Nuclear power should be a major energy source
For
you do make a good point but you forget it is believed that a nuclear fission reaction produces ten million times as much energy as when a fossil fuel atom is burned and they can run for a year straight if put the nuclear power plant on say the man made islands that china is…
but it supplies 14% of the worlds power and we have plenty of uranium it would last just as long as coal and it better for the earth
Against
Since we both agree that Nucler power is unsafe, that should be a prevailing argument for this debate. Despite how helpful it maybe , since we cannot be assured of safety it cannot be used. It's like saying that we will let a wolf live in the house because he is helpful in some…
I agree that Nuclear Power can be growing solution to electricity supply to the world. The issue is that is comes we safety concerns. In the recent World history each generation experienced devastating effects of a nuclear plant malfunction. In each case everyone was assured…
11.
Developed countries have a moral duty to address climate change
For
Devoloped countries have a moral obligation to lessen the effects of climate change
Against
Because pro has forfeited both times I urge for con vote.
Despite forfeiting in the last round I will assume that you will post in the final round. A developed country does not have the moral obligation to mitigate the effects of climate change (assuming this is natural climate change instead of human induced climate change.) for two…
12.
Governments should set stricter vehicle fuel economy standards
For
Fuel economy standards help car companies stay competitive
Gas savings make-up for any higher initial costs of vehicles
Against
Gas taxes reduce miles driven better than fuel economy standards
Fuel economy standards increase driving so do not decrease emissions
13.
Meat production should be significantly reduced
For
Grain-fattened U. S. beef is even more inefficient, taking up to 10 times more grain to get the equivalent amount of meat. With a billion people worldwide under the poverty line, this is something we can't afford. We should eat grain, not meat. ------ Ranch animals make more…
Thank you, Lexicaholic for waiting patiently for my belated response. I had to attend my brother's Memorial Day weekend baseball tournament. Sorry for implying you were an idiot. I was tired when I wrote my last argument. I would also like to remind my opponent that this…
Against
My thanks to my opponent for initiating this debate. My opponent contends that meat production should be significantly reduced. I contend that meat consumption should be significantly reduced instead, as the market for meat consumption is presently too large, and its economic…
I stand in negation of the above resolution. As my opponent has stated that this round is merely for the purposes of acquiring an opponent, I will refrain from arguing this round.
14.
Nature ultimately controls human affairs more than people do
For
Naturalism
No choice
Against
Mother Nature no longer controls the environment
Monotheism
15.
Behavioral change is the key to environmental sustainability
For
I rest my case, seeing as the Con has failed to respond to any of my arguments and foreited every round, I can only see a Pro vote
Seeing as he has no intention of responding, I will simply extend my arguments once again
Against
Environmental sustainability need not be achieved by behavioral change.
16.
Earth Hour is an ineffective environmental campaign
For
Thank you for your questions. I will focus on your question as to why earth hour is useless. Firstly, I recognize that Earth hour has good intentions in changing the attitudes of the people towards climate change. But those intentions are not actually realized. According to…
Defintion of Terms Earth Hour is a worldwide event organized by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and held towards the end of March annually, encouraging households and businesses to turn off their non-essential lights for one hour to raise awareness about the need to take…
Against
very interesting i must say. first off, i would like state that again, what do you propose to stop this? Its not like we can fine people for turning there lights off and using candles. And if they want to turn out there street lights, we can recommend against it and maybe force…
I would first like to say, is this hurting anyone? And also, what is the point? You say this is useless, but do you know that for sure? What are your facts? Your prof that this is pointless? I would like to say that at this point anything to help the environment is worth it.…
17.
Poaching is worse than other forms of animal cruelty
For
People say that terrorism is terrible. I completely agree. But poaching is much worse. Why? Well, terrorism kills people. But poaching kills the Earth. We live on the Earth and want it to be clean and safe for life. But that's not happening. We're destroying our Earth without…
Against
Gingers are pretty terrible aren't they?
Extend all arguments.
18.
White tiger breeding should be illegal
For
lets ask ourselves: what is the meaning of conservation? protecting our natural resources. white tigers are a result of captive inbreeding and rarely would exist without the interference of humans. white tigers are not a subspecies. conservation is saving, and we created white…
white tigers are beautiful majestic creatures. you go to a zoo maybe just to see one. but there's something the zoos seem to forget to tell you. white tigers could not exist in the wild. they are inbred in captivity. white tigers are white because of genetic mutation. made…
Against
I'm new to this site, and appreciate the opportunity to "cut my teeth". That said, let me get right to it. Should I violate any norms, please forgive me (and hold me accountable, though, so I can learn). I'll begin with some preliminary points: My opponent has put forth the…
I believe I've won the debate here based on the arguments. However, I respect my opponent's desire to help the tigers, and think we can both agree that responsible conservation should definitely be the goal, and that inbreeding, if done at all, must be done in a way that…
19.
Ecotourism does more harm than good
For
I. Ecotourism Does Benefit the Environment A. According to Komo News, Ecotourism's human impact on nature is part of the natural process 1. Humans are part of nature, and their impact on nature is part of the World's natural processes. 2. This doesn't mean that humans should be…
Against
game over.
Same as above
20.
Nature deserves more attention than technology
For
First of all I'm sorry for not posting my argument earlier. 1.) Now I am not like con. I don't have to quote what some famous people have said because I have an opinion of my own and I intend to stand behind my words not behind other peoples believes. 2.) I don't think that con…
Yes I am new and thanks. Good luck to you too. I never understood how can people ignore all of the complexity and beauty in nature. I mean why would someone willingly spend their time rather on a piece of tech than outside with people. So many opportunities are missed because…
Against
I will keep my comments for this round short given that Pro forfeited the last round. Final remarks and statements by Con. Pro provides some claims and reasons for why nature is worth more attention than technology. However, they exclusively rely on inferences that Con does not…
First, so I want to reiterate the proposition debated: is nature worth more attention than technology. While the burden of proof is fully Pro's, I will emphasize my position by state [technology is worth more attention than nature] The Burden of Proof is Pro's alone. This is…
21.
PETA's activism helps save animals
For
As was easily proved in this debate, Peta helps save animals. I have not needed to make the claim of them being particularly effective at actually saving animals, so long as they help. Their ads are memorable, and teach important lessons about what a few less calories can cause…
Extend all arguments.In order to be sporting, here's a line of reasoning Con should be able to counter...Another example of Peta's very helpful campaigns, is their interference against Seal Clubbing [4]. Basically while clubbing is good, clubbing seals is bad. Insert lots of…
Against
Good Luck. Now for my argument. Last year alone Peta killed 89.4% of it's adoptable dogs and cats. They kill an average of 30 pets per week. In 2012 1,843 pets were recieved, 1,647 were killed. The others were adopted or transferred. In 2007, 2 Peta employees were caught…
22.
Wave carpet technology should be a major renewable energy source
For
HarmsA. Global warming is real and caused by humans – the only way to avoid the devastating impacts of warming, such as extinction, is to reduce CO2 emissions IPCC, 14 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 11/2/14, "Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report",…
Against
Ok
Rekt m8
23.
Global warming is real and we ought to do something about it
For
Because I wasn't imformed you accepted I am very sorry. Global Warming is very real. We have three rays (probably more.) that come down to earth one very weak one stays down here. Now more are being stuck in here because of a layer built up of non-renewable energy. So it is…
The last time I tried doing this I made the time way to short I accidently took to long to post my answer and it said I had dropped out so lets do this again. I believe that we should take actions by slowly changing from non-renewable energy to renewable energy. To keep…
Against
you do a redo but yet you dont rebut my argument. why?
i guess i agree with taking actions to slowly change but i dont think we should stop drilling until we completly drill it all up. i also dont believe we have any effect on global warming because the polar ice caps are 60 percent bigger than they were a year ago. everytime obama…
24.
Human activity is not solely responsible for global warming
For
"My opponent doesn't believe we humans have caused global warming." I never said that. I said I believe "Global warming is not solely humans fault." Second- "humans caused it. Experts said it." That is only partly true. Most experts believe otherwise:…
I believe global warming is not caused by humans.
Against
My opponent has ran out of time for this debate and could not counter any of my arguments.
My opponent was not able to post a new argument within the allotted time, therefore I am extending my arguments.
25.
Human activity is causing climate change
For
Just curious as to see what your argument will be! Looking forward to it. But just to clarify, I'm talking about the rising of global temperatures caused by increased CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere leading to the greenhouse effect. Good luck!
Against
All points extended.
All points extended.
26.
Greenpeace does more harm than good
For
Full resolution: On the whole, the environmental organization Greepeace has caused (or has attempted to cause) more harm than good in the world.First round for acceptance. The last round is for summarization; no new arguments. 48 hours to argue each of the 4 rounds.…
1. DDTsA part per million is one milligram per kilogram (1 / 1,000,000). To reach the bare minimum of toxicity (5 grams, as I noted in the previous round) you'd need 5000 parts per million. Even with a fish at the bottom of the food chain, a few parts per million cannot be…
Against
Alright, lets do this. Leroy...
I'm going to keep this short, because I have other work to do. So my opponent is saying green peace did everything he listed above in his argument. Actually, he is wrong. The Government of the United States of America did[1] Green peace didn't pull the trigger in any event,…
27.
The US should build more mineral accretion coral reefs
For
Every single objection brought up in the last round was fundementally logically deficent, pushed hypocritical terms, limited the round educationally made an inumerable amount of hasty generalizaitons among other logical fallacies and debased this entire debate. Instead of…
Let's try and begin here:Fairness Cons claim 1.) The "entire point of [policy debate] is to evaluate the Affirmative team plan" 2.) It is absolutely against the rules to ever change or amend a plan in a policy round 3.) Pro has changed or amended the plan by changing the price…
Against
1. Pro has never claimed that this is policy debate (From the Government agency rebuttal) 1.) The plan will be carried out through Normal Means, Just as Every Single Policy Debate Plan Is. Policy: a high-level overall plan embracing the general goals and acceptable procedures…
The cons argument will flow as follows: Cost State protection Trade ___________ Case offense answers Hurts biodiversity Cost The pro's claim that the demand by con to protect their case rather than amend it during a debate is invalid. As this is a policy debate, the entire…
28.
Human activity is harming the environment and humankind
For
I trust our debate will be judged without prejudice. Regardless of debating skills, reality is I am simply on the fact based side of this argument. The fact you are going against the tide of science and logic will give you ample opportunity to showcase you debating skills. I am…
The evidence of human activity damaging our own habitat, the Earth, is based on sound, credible science. This includes, but not limited to, climate change. The denials are based on economic interests of businesses, particularly, but not limited to, oil industry, with similar…
Against
When one speaks of the human race self destructing, I consider that the end of the world or doom if you will. The human race is the only species that can think in abstract to comprehend doom or self destruction in the context presented here. "If we're not careful, we'll be just…
OK, Now I have your opinion on the planet being doomed. Now the tough part begins. "Increasingly, we cannot drink the water, breath the air, eat the food because of toxins and poisons" These problems are a result of local incompetence of local govts and the importation of food,…
29.
Walking has a greater negative environmental impact than driving
For
In this debate I will argue against the popular belief that walking to any given destination is more environment-friendly than driving to said destination. This debate assumes that the minimum distance that must be traveled over to reach the destination is ten miles. The debate…
Con's entire argument is built on the basis that the food production industry and related enterprises that allow for its processing and transport is what causes the carbon emissions. Con states that because these emissions are the product of the food industry and not the…
Against
With many apologies to both my opponent and the audience, I regret having to forfeit the last round -- As you can see I was not online for 6 days due to problems with my internet at home. My forfeit should not be considered when judging the "conduct" portion of this debate,…
For clarification, I'll re-cap my opponent's argument simplistically: He claims that because one burns calories while walking, in order for them to sustain their calorie in-take they will be forced to eat food whose production and transportation emits more carbon than the fuel…
30.
Carbon dioxide cannot cause catastrophic warming via the greenhouse effect
For
First I will state some of the reasons why I believe that carbon dioxide cannot cause catastrophic heating. My reasons are as follows: 1.Carbon dioxide is not the most abundant nor most important "greenhouse gas". Water (in the forms of clouds and water vapor ) is the most…
The popular theory states that as carbon dioxide levels increase so too will the temperature at an exponential rate. According to the popular "greenhouse effect" theory carbon dioxide is the main driver of the Earth's temperature however according most of the reliable science…
Against
First of all, I'd like to say thank you to JBpixie for posting this argument. Second, I'd like to state my position on this matter: While carbon dioxide is not the sole cause behind global warming, the United States as a whole should try to limit the amount of emissions for the…
First of all I have to comment on how JBpixie has not used one reference to wear he obtains his information, seeing as how every fact I have stated has a source. -------------------- "-Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. It is one of the most essential gases for life. Without it…
31.
Human-caused global warming is overhyped
For
forfeiting
I am certain that the emission of green house gases produced through human activity has affected climates and temperatures world wide. There is no question about this in my mind. It is not even a matter of mere correlation really. Greenhouse gases trap heat and human beings are…
Against
Hmmm...well. I am not gonna post an arugment this round, and we shall see if the challenger returns. If not, I will post a closing argument next round for the sake of procedure.
Hello Muslimnomore! "I am certain that the emission of green house gases produced through human activity has affected climates and temperatures world wide. There is no question about this in my mind. It is not even a matter of mere correlation really." Great! This we can agree…
32.
Pipelines should be built despite environmental concerns
For
No no, don't do that voters, Con's argument was atrocious- he had holes everywhere. I would argue that the whole "spill is likely" argument should land me the 3 points without me saying a word! And all the forfeit was was me letting Con vent, you don't interrupt a man when he's…
*Yawn* Yea, me too.
Against
My opponent has been unable to provide an argument, and I don't seem him intending to do so. Hence, unless my opponent is able to provide an argument, I encourage voters to give a 7 point vote on my behalf.
Yawn...Extend all arguments.
33.
The US should ban imports of goods from the Amazon rainforest
For
I knocked down your points so if you just stand by them then you pretty much lose (although you already lost because of the forfeit, sorry). If you don't want to write all that over and over, you could use copy and paste... I don't mind... or you could post new content. Voters,…
zxcvzxcvzxcv, why did you forfeit? :( It was a good debate so far and now you have to lose it. Well I guess... voters please cast your ballot for the proposition (me)
Against
I didn't forfeit. I guess I waited too long to come back. But anyway I stand by my points. I'm not getting paid for this so I don't feel like writing 50 paragraphs over and over.
P1: The effects of mining in the rainforest are disastrous. P2: We need to minimize deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest. P3: Banning imports from the Amazon will help protect & preserve it. P1) True, but we're not arguing whether or not the effects are disastrous. This is…
34.
Important natural resources will be depleted within 300 years
For
Moreover, global warming could reach new levels in 300 years. The natural resources may be depleted due to overheat (water evaporation, plant requiring water, fossil fuels burned) so that is another angle.
Well BOP can be shared, but I'll need to provide some proof anyways. Source 1 http://www.worldometers.info... This source shows the amount of water consumed in a day, which is 1.5 million liters, with 64000 liters demand increasing per year. It also says the world's population…
Against
Preface:- I should remind the voters that the BOP is on Pro, for he is making the affirmative positive claim: "In approximate 300 years, important natural resources should be finished", thus I am not compelled to support the counter-claim, I am only required to refute Pro's…
Note: - I shall remind Pro that the affirmative resolution is: "in approximate 300 years, important natural resources should be finished", not "assuming the current state of affairs, in approximate 300 years, important natural resources should be finished". A LOT can change in…
35.
The current world cannot be sustained in the long term
For
I misread the original post so argued on your side on my opener so I apologize, I will try and redeem myself. Firstly energy or matter cannot be created or destroyed. This entails us to believe that we cannot actually 'generate' more energy or matter, just convert between the…
I fundamentally believe that although humanity appears to have an exponential growth rate of demand for anything and everything that this trend is curving off. We see that consumption of non-renewables appears to rise year on year yet we see that many nations now are investing…
Against
You can't pick up an article or turn on the news without running across the word "sustainability." So, I got to thinking about what sustainability means on an individual level—not from a purely ecological perspective, but from a humanistic one. Ecologically, sustainability is…
We need sustainable sources of energy for the future because we are using up our natural resources i.e. oil faster than the planet can replenish them. That means we will eventually run out of oil. It does not mean that no more oil will ever be created, it just means that it…
36.
Nuclear energy should be expanded
For
i may not provide sources of other countiries successfully using nuclear, but there's not much to say. there's no problems so there's no news. it would be easier for con to show the problems they have, which she hasn't done. because she can't, because there are really no…
as already admitted, there are cons to nuclear, as there are cons to all sources. at least with nuclear we aren't destroying the atmosphere. and if you look at other countries, they seem to be handling things just fine. per weopons, the USA already has hundreds of them. using…
Against
As Pro is the one asserting that nuclear should be expanded, they are absolutely required to provide a convincing case fully supported with sources. Pro claims that I [as Con] have *not* showed what the problems are with the expansion but I made three separate contentions in…
Rebuttals: Pro has already admitted that there are "cons" to using nuclear, and as I've outlined in round one--it appears to be quite evident that these "Cons" outweigh the "Pros". The main Con being the huge expensive of nuclear energy; especially when it comes to establishing…
37.
Global warming is primarily caused by humans
For
Like many people my opponent is mislead to believe that Global Warming means the earth is just getting hotter. The word "Global warming" can be misleading as well. But many parts of the Earth have gotten colder because of Global Warming. The reason being pressure changes in…
Global warming is man made.
Against
Regarding the copy-pasta'd youtube video: I would suggest you not just post links without saying what is in them since that is not debating. I am able to do the same thing but I'd rather not since it lowers both our enjoyment. Regarding your argument: You provided no definition…
First off I must say that my opponent holds the BOP since he made the claim that global warming is man made. But in this first round I will bring forth one piece of evidence but I reserve the right to bring more in later. Warming is a myth: There is no scientific consensus and…
38.
Global warming is real and human-caused
For
In this ROUND--the final ROUND--I will explain what it is about carbon dioxide, water vapor, and methane that allow them to be heat-trapping greenhouse gases. I will also briefly explain how global warming facilitates climate change and then go over the various effects of…
In ROUND 3 I will continue my ROUND 2 response, where I will show the link between carbon dioxide emitted by human activity and the increase in global surface temperatures. In the final ROUND I will go over the effects of climate change caused by global warming.Carbon Dioxide…
Against
I disagree with my opponent's assertion. The following information will prove that global warming is a false theory. 1. The 20th century warming of 1-1.4"F is within the +/- 5"F range of the past 3,000 years. A 2003 study by researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for…
39.
Radiation levels should be included in weather forecasts
For
Con stated "First off, Radioactivity and Cancer have nothing to do with weather, It's only environmental, Not natural". . . You sir have a lot of explaining to do. What's Environmental and what's not Natural. Please clarify.
Given the increase in amount of Cancer cases reported by the National Cancer Institute. Radioactive levels should be included as part of News Broadcast Weather Report.
Against
First off, Radioactivity and Cancer have nothing to do with weather, It's only environmental, Not natural. It doesn't matter how many people die from "Cancer" it has nothing to do with any weather forecast.
First off, "You sir have a lot of explaining to do. What's Environmental and what's not Natural. Please clarify. " I didn't say that Radioactivity wasn't or isn't environmental, I only said that Cancer and Radioactivity has nothing to do with weather in general. Smoking a…
40.
Modern technology is causing serious environmental harm
For
Vote for me cause of S&G!
Exactly my point. Modern industry makes smoke that is a very terrible thing.
Against
So many people have asking me that does the bad environment is causing because of the modern technology? The answer is not really or strongly No! The topic is going to be telling by 3 main reason. First, the pollution. There are so many kinds of the pollution like: air…
So many people have asking me that does the bad environment is causing because of the modern technology? The answer is not really or strongly No! The topic is going to be telling by 3 main reason. First, the pollution. There are so many kinds of the pollution like: air…
41.
Climate alarmism is causing the global food crisis
For
"As has already been stated in the comments section, 95% of scientists believe in global warming." The question is not whether scientists believe in global warming (aka climate change), its whether they believe in man made global warming. That statistic sounds about right. I…
You guys are a joke. You deserve the equal blame for the troubles in the United States with the politicians because you elect these idiots into congress and the house. And i'm not targeting all liberals in general, I'm only targeting all the liberals in Washington D.C. The…
Against
You know what? It doesn't matter whether global warming is man-made or not. I can prove my point without it. "I agree that food shortages have been happening for the last half-century, but the recent food crisis of the last 5 or so years has been drastically worse (notice the…
First, I'd like to say that in order for your argument to be truly valid, you must disprove the merits of fighting global warming. As has already been stated in the comments section, 95% of scientists believe in global warming. i think they know more about the issue than you…
42.
The ecological crisis deserves more focus than the economic crisis
For
On the topic of not underestimating the ecological crisis in comparison with the economic crisis.Firstly, I would like to point out the length of the ecological cris in comparison with the economic crisis. The existence of the ecological crisis is, ofcourse, commonly known. The…
I will try to firmly make a case for this opinion in the second round!
Against
Here are my arguments for why I disagree with the statement that the ecological crisis, e.g. climate change, should be focused on more than the economic crisis. First however, I would like to assert a few things. I do not disagree with the theory of global warming and I do not…
Good luck to you as well, I look forward to a good debate. I am taking the con (against) side of this argument because I disagree with the statement that "The ecological crisis should be more focused on than the economic crisis." To the contrary, we should the economy going…
43.
The Earth can look after itself
For
That is all I would like to say for now. ..
Thank you for admitting your failure.
Against
"You are quite ignorant I can tell that by the way you said all the earth does is spin pfffftttt..." You are quit vague you showed no support. How am I ignorant? Alright the Earth is not a living thing. "The only thing it would affect is us, not earth" Is there anything that…
1. The Earth has no mind to look after itself. 2. The Earth does nothing more than spin. 3. What will the Earth do during pollution? 4. If a giant meteor where to strike the Earth what could the Earth do? Conclusion: not such a good debate topic, vague introduction. Good luck.
44.
The US should increase its use of nuclear energy
For
So first I'd like to begin by stating that you gave no evidence for most of your points although some of it is implied. 1. For this point I have two responses. First, there has never been a terrorist attack against a plant and most arguments along this line are just plain fear…
There will be 4 rounds. 1st round, both teams just post their arguments, no rebuttals. 2nd round, pro refutes neg's round 1arguments, neg then refutes pro's round 1 arguments and pro's round 2 rebuttal. 3rd round, pro will refute neg's round 2, neg will refute aff's round 3.…
Against
Argument 1: The current system, with a majority of energy being produced by coal and natural gas (41.9, 24.8) is harmful to the United States -the major polluter are cars not coal energy producing stations 1a)Generating energy with coal plants has many harmful side effects…
We are told that USA & the world at large faces an energy crisis unless we build new nuclear power plants. First the pemis of an energy crisis is fake & secondly nuclear energy is more of a risky & expensive solution, it creates layers of problems, we should rather invest…
45.
Ethiopia is right to build a dam on the River Nile
For
Environmental Benefits of the GERD
The dam is predicted to provide energy for all of Ethiopia
Against
Natural Flow Theory
Egypt and Sudan will have their legal rights infringed
46.
Concerns about global warming are politically exaggerated
For
It's become a pattern with you and your fellow liberals on this site, that you the dissect the argument stated when knowing what was implied. Such a style of debating is quite boring and time consuming. So to dissect the meaning of "scam" which you stated "a fraudulent business…
The media coverage on pollution affecting global warming on a grand scale is a scam lead by liberals such as Al Gore, Michael Moore and the liberal media.
Against
Extend my arguments.
Definitions: My opponent agrees that a scam is inherently "fraudulent". This implies that the intent is deceitful. Therefore, my opponent must demonstrate deceitful intent by said liberals. Case: Essentially, my opponent merely argues an alternative cause to global warming. The…
47.
Global warming is real and happening today
For
Magnificent job on your debate and rebuttals!A quick question, How did you get images in your rebuttal?I have been trying to do that for a while, but it has never seemed to workThanks for the great debate
Rebuttals" (Con) The super volcano in Yellow Stone National Park is due to erupt and the effects would cause a new ice age greater than the Toba Eruption."There is no denying that there will be some sort of period in which the earth will get very cold, but that will not stop it…
Against
Thank you for a chance to debate this subject. Here is a link to a thread I made on how to insert images into a debate; http://www.debate.org...;
My opponent claims, "and the immense amount of C02 that is being realised into our atmosphere that is destroying the Ozone layer" however the green house effect, and the ozone depletion are two separate theories. The so called, green house effect is supposedly caused by CO2,…
48.
Nuclear energy is better than fossil fuels
For
So last argument, fossil fuels do have there negative effects, i.e. carbon emissions and oil spills, but so do nuclear power plants. A. Nuclear waste takes over 20,000 years to decompose, and it can't be avoided since it is the natural byproduct. B. Oil spills can be avoided…
I don't know if it would be fair to give an argument this round since he/she didn't, so I will make it brief since I want to be fair yet not be handicapped because of his/her lack of readiness. If we were to rely on nuclear power alone, we would need to increase energy output…
Against
I think that because it is renewable it is better just want opinions and facts please
49.
Hybrid vehicles are harmful to society
For
Yes many people like the Prius. But most people aren't as concerned about performance as I am when it comes to good vs bad cars. I apologize for not stating that i was speaking about performance. That is 100% my fault. So, in the performance world, a car must: Look good Have…
I believe you misunderstood my argument. Firstly, the Camry is a nice, tasteful vehicle (I never said that all Toyotas are boring). However, I am talking about the Toyota PRIUS being boring. And it does not handle better than most sedans, or hatchbacks. Also, I believe you…
Against
First of all, I would like to notify you that the appearance of a car doesn't neccesarily influence the preformance of the car unless the key components of the car are displayed in the appearance.Rebuttals:"Have good acceleration"I would first like to rebut this quote from your…
I am sorry for misunderstanding your arguments. It was my fault for not reading your arguments thoroughly. I will now rephrase my arguments:First of all, you are not clear on which model you are describing, so I will assume you are describing the newest model: The 2015 Toyota…
50.
Feral house cats should be exterminated
For
v
Feral house cats are vermin because they cause disease in humans [4]. , destroy wildlife, and even cause extinction of species. [5]. The feral cats should be exterminated because there are so many and destroying them would cease the previously mentioned detrimental affects.…
Against
Con contends that Pro is either: A. A troll who has nothing better to do with his life than post BS pointless debates and play mind games B. a psychopath who wants to kill animals before moving on to people

How to use these debate topics

Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

Environment Debate Topics for Students

How to use these debate topics

Run them live

More question collections