Discussly

Economy Debate Topics — page 18

1,397 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.

All agesDebatePage 18 of 28
  1. 851.

    Reaganomics has benefited the American economy

    For

    • I'm not sure how I prove trillions have been spent overseas, but I know the Iraq and Afghan operations cost the country around 2 trillion based on C.B.O. estimates alone. All US citizens see for it is a destabilized Iraq, that now might pose a threat in terms of terror. How…
    • I don't think it is fair to use time lines. I believe when the rich have control of the money, they create more money and we are all better off in the end. The poor keep getting poorer for reasons such as overpopulation, or perhaps free trade agreements with countries where the…

    Against

    • The problem is, you cannot have your cake and eat it, too. You cannot, on one end, argue that military spending -- a core tenet of Reaganomics -- is foolish and unsustainable, and then endorse it under certain circumstances. You cannot make a claim about trillions of dollars…
    • Extending.
  2. 852.

    Abolishing the minimum wage would not reduce unemployment

    For

    • My opponent seems to confuse my saying that removing the minimum wage will reduce wages with me saying that most people earn the minimum wage. I very well know that the number of people earning the minimum wage is low (at least in the US, but this is far from being the case in…
    • My opponent claims that if it was true that abolishing minimum wage would reduce wages overall, then this would have happened already, and he brings the example of the jobs that get more than the minimum wage. But this does not counter my argument. While increased scarcity in…

    Against

    • "Most other positions" being almost all. Very few jobs are presently minimum wage. http://www.heritage.org... Effectively 1 in 200 Americans presently has a minimum wage. Even if it were somehow possible to set off a cascading wage spiral, these are not the fellows to do it…
    • " Removing the minimum wage in an economy is akin to cutting wages all across the economy as Capitalist firms will scramble over each other in their rush to reduce costs." Labor is neither homogenous nor passive. If it were, as your argument requires, there would be no such…
  3. 853.

    Regulation harms and defeats capitalism

    For

    • My opponent has ignored my request to wait a day before responding. In fact, he went out of his way to post on Tuesday night. This forced me to write an argument in minimal time. I apologize for my briefness. "My opponent claims to be defending Capitalism, but is, in fact,…
    • "Regulation, though not perfect and ever changing, attempts to protect the liberties of the consumer, the worker, and the competition, thus ensuring the survival of Capitalism and Democracy. " One's purpose and one's result are two different things. In a similar fashion,…

    Against

    • 1. Anarchism (from same source) is also defined as: 3. Rejection of all forms of coercive control and authority. My opponent rejects the encoded rules and regulations that govern our Capitalist economy under the Uniform Commercial Code, and other written rules and regulations…
    • "I am arguing that most of the problems..." -My opponent has only presented hypothetical situations that the logic proves contrary. If given the opportunity to operate outside the rule of law, companies will do what they can to make a profit. My opponent claims to be defending…
  4. 854.

    Socialism is a harmful economic system

    For

    • Therefore I will state a few key points on the legitamacy of my opponents argument. -First, he uses hipocrisy with his statements as he accuses me of not "warranting" my information when he goes about stating his opinions without any evidence whatsoever. -Second, he then tries…
    • Socialism is detrimental to society for a variety of reasons. Most people get caught up in socialism because of the good nature of it. It sounds appealing and in theory should solve poverty, unequal pay, and much more. It is also affective because it takes advantage of people's…

    Against

    • I realize now that even though I have 8000 characters to use, I probably won't need that much.My opponent tries to make a few claims about my refutations:"I didn't warrant my information"False, I provided clear and logical analysis as to why my refutations and arguments were…
    • Gonna do the round from my phone. Oh boy, here we go. The only conceivable way I can go about this on my phone is to respond to my opponent's points paragraph by paragraph. So lets get started. My opponents first paragraph doesn't really say all that much. All he does in that…
  5. 855.

    The minimum wage should be raised to $15 an hour

    For

    • I deeply apologize I had lots of homework over the last three days so therefore I didn't have time to post. The win goes to con I look forward to a rematch in the future I am deeply sorry.
    • I also look forward to how this debate will shake out in the voting. So the debate begins! Worker Rights: if you a working in a society you do not deserve to live in poverty nor should you be homeless on the streets and working. Something is wrong if you have people working…

    Against

    • Extend
    • Because there are no rebuttals in round 2 I will just state my argumentsReason 1:Increasing the minimum wage would cause an extreme loss of jobs. Why is this? Many businesses cannot afford to pay workers above the regular 7 dollars an hour. An estimated 500,000 jobs will be…
  6. 856.

    Essential services should be socialized and private services regulated

    For

    • I will begin by offering 3 main premises for my argument. 1. Most essential services that all human beings are entitled to as members of society should be socialized. Socialized, meaning owned and operated by the community as a whole, whether that means through the Government,…
    • I will offer rebuttals and a closing statement. My opponent claims that nations with universal healthcare are not nearly as wealthy as the United States, and that the 2nd most richest nation on Earth (People's Republic of China) has only half the GDP of the US. For starters,…

    Against

    • The assertion that the PRC had 1/2 the nominal GDP is correct. Pro wishes to use a different measuring scale which is perfectly acceptable but the fact still remains that this is the next wealthiest nation and provides a scale of where other nations with universal healthcare…
    • Contrary to pro's assertion, nations with universal healthcare are not nearly as wealthy as the US whose free market system has made it possible. The 2nd wealthiest nation is the PRC whose GDP is only half of the US. Also, average amounts/person are inaccurate because they…
  7. 857.

    The government should not be involved in the energy market

    For

    • The government should NOT be involved in the energy market. The best way to determine which energy source should be used is through the market - then prices can tell us which form of energy is the most economic. When you get the government involved you start making decisions…
    • Let me begin by summarizing the debate on global warming. Both government climate scientists and skeptics agree that warming is happening as a result of increased CO2 levels. Government scientists argue that as CO2 levels in the atmosphere double, you have a temperature…

    Against

    • Hi Zak, I accept your challenge!Contention I: Division of Ground and BOPResolution reads, "The government should NOT be involved in the energy market." "Involvement" has not been defined, but syntax indicates that we are dealing with a broad economic category, which includes…
    • Please extend my arguments. Pro forfeits. Con wins.
  8. 858.

    eBay is better than Amazon

    For

    • Idgaf what the topic is. Alright Basketball or Cricket?
    • What is wrong with the world that art not trust each other anymore? What happened to the early days of Adam and Eve where it was all sunshine and happiness? Truth is, Ebay has a far better layout and not utterly confusing as Amazon.

    Against

    • Unbelievable. You're an imbecile.
    • That's just it! People are not honest, therefore to use the more reliable site would give you the trust that you are buying and that you will be receiving just what you paid for. The topic of this debate is not whether the layout is better, we are talking in general terms.
  9. 859.

    We should have a progressive tax system

    For

    • The second round will be for arguments. The third round for rebuttal. The last round for conclusion (no new facts may be introduced).

    Against

    • I win
    • Ok
  10. 860.

    The United States should return to the gold standard

    For

    • Refutation #1My opponent has responded by stating that production causes deflation and thus the U.S. should not go back on the gold standard. Here is why he is wrong. The gold standard does not limit the increase in the amount of dollars to just 2% a year, the average increase…
    • Hello, I am going to talk about why the gold standard. Anyway, Republicans have always supported the gold standard and we were very prosperous under it. Look at the Gilded Age with strong Republican presidents like Chester Arthur, Benjamin Harrison, and William McKinely. So I…

    Against

    • Gold standard and deflation My opponent claims production is irrelevant as the Federal Reserve has enough gold stock to keep the dollar "as good as gold". But is this a viable argument? No, not really. Although the amount of gold stock is a good indicator of deflation, even my…
    • Gold Standard and deflation My opponent's arguments actually do not even scathe my argument and actually shows he does not understand currency. His main theme in his rebuttal in the US has enough gold in stock to sustain a gold standard. We have enough paper money to sustain…
  11. 861.

    Three percent annual economic growth is unsustainable

    For

    • I would like to start by pointing out that in his rebuttal Con made several arguments against mine that were fact instead of logic based without citing sources. (Other than a Wikipedia biography-essentially pointless.) 1. Con asserts that globalization has helped the economy,…
    • "The burden of proof is on you, because you are proving that economic growth is unsustainable. I must prove that an economy can grow indefinitely (within reason)." So I guess that BoP is on both of us then. As you state- "burden of proof is on you" and "I must prove". 1. a.…

    Against

    • Rebuttal:To 1aThis is an absurd argument. Of course the world will face wars and terrorism and immigration, and of course these are not good for growth. But despite wars, and terrorism, and immigration, the developed world grew at a relatively consistent pace for the 20th…
    • I will provide a rebuttal of this argument."The problem with a constant growth in GDP is that in such a globalized world you can't just expect other countries to let your country grow."Actually, you can. Globalization has actually helped economic growth - look at all of the…
  12. 862.

    A mandated minimum wage does more damage than good

    For

    • This debate will consist of four rounds. Round One catalogs the pertinent definitions and rules, wherein my opponent may address any concerns. Rounds Two and Three shall comprise the claims, counter-claims, and evidence in a Lincoln-Douglas style debate. Round Four will be…
    • Obviously my opponent has forfeit.

    Against

    • Good day to those who will be observing this debate. I would first like to ask how a mandated minimum wage does more harm than a minimum wage without being mandated? Secondly Without a mandated minimum wage wouldn't an unfair form of favoritism become present in the workplace?…
    • As I begin my conclusion, I would like to remind voters of the resolution: A mandated minimum wage does more damage than good." Note that I was under no obligation to prove that the minimum wage was necessarily beneficial, only that the costs do not outweigh the benefits. For…
  13. 863.

    The gold standard should be restored

    For

    • Thank you for such a quick reply! RC1: Not everyone in the world trades gold in this way One of the best things that the gold standard does for America is that it gives us a solid currency that other countries can trade with. Some of the countries that we would be trading with…
    • C1: Inflation is rare Something can only be valuable when it is somewhat rare. If a certain currency has been printed to an extent where there is too much in the economy, it loses it's value. The reason for this is because it has lost a portion of it's rarity making it less…

    Against

    • Thanks you PRO for your response. RC1: Gold despite its famous stable nature is still a product If anybody had taken economics they would know the price of anything is dependent on the supply and demand. Changes in supply and changes in demand both affect the price of a…
    • C1: Technology changes the value for gold Some problems with todays world is that technology is taking over jewelry. If you haven't realized fewer and fewer people are buying jewelry for their loved ones and the market for a lot of jewelry is changing. If a modern person were…
  14. 864.

    Unemployment benefits should be paid as vouchers, not cash

    For

    • Latvia Summary
    • 3) More social incentive to find a job

    Against

    • Opposition Summary & Conclusion
    • Vouchers for Basics of Life would Exacerbate the Economy
  15. 865.

    The federal government should require stocks to pay dividends

    For

    • First of all, by issuing these bonds and encouraging investors to take them instead of cash, the companies in question ARE simply reinvesting the profits, to be paid out at a later date. And smart investors will generally prefer the profits be reinvested because that would…
    • I assert the following: The Securities and Exchange Commission should mandate that all companies must pay a certain minimum dividend to their shareholders proportional to their earnings, either in cash or in corporate bonds. My reasoning: Almost every major economic downturn in…

    Against

    • See above.
    • yep, kentucky fried forfeit.
  16. 866.

    Welfare recipients should be required to work for their benefits

    For

    • Kudos to you. Excellent argument. Let me just say that I posted this as an idea, and hoped that someone would respond with a intelligent argument providing the flaws and drawbacks of such an idea. What you are saying is most certainly correct. I was not talking directly about…
    • All Citizens on Welfare, besides disability, should have to work to receive their checks. Everyone has heard stories of people exploiting the welfare system, or lazy people lounging around all day collecting checks. These people should have to work for this money. If they are…

    Against

    • Pro forfeits, so continue my arguments.
    • Pro's thesis is predicated on the assumption that welfare recipients are "lazy" or disinterested in work to a degree sufficient to require a change to current welfare standards. Although I am confident that such individuals exist, the data demonstrates that this…
  17. 867.

    Capitalism is better than communism

    For

    • I will be trusting my opponent's definitions for these two philosophies. Argument 1: Capitalism achieves innovation- One of my main values is innovation. The ability to innovate is a very wonderful thing humanity has done and is our very nature. What was happening before humans…
    • I will be defending capitalism, and the reason why I am doing this is I see that in the left, there are a lot of people being won over by the idea of communism. I will be trying to prove that capitalism the best we have and communism is not.

    Against

    • Hi, and thanks for replying so quickly. As the rules said, I'm only going to be giving my constructive case, no rebuttals. -----Communism is work-based. According to the very definition of communism, that I offered and was accepted by my opponent, people are based on their…
    • Thanks for starting this debate, I accept. With acceptance I'm going to define some terms that we need to know in order to debate the topic at hand, "capitolism [sic] is much better than communism" Capitalism - an economic and political system in which a country's trade and…
  18. 868.

    Taxes on cars with large engines should be raised

    For

    • Let us vote!
    • Rebuttals: ***They are expensive for most middle class people, and if even they are not expensive, they can choose a car that is cheaper in price and smaller engine to avoid paying additional (carbon)tax. ***Another, you cited Kazakhstan as your example not to increase tax on…

    Against

    • Firstly, in our country car with volume of engine from 3 and up are very popular, especially in rural area. They are not expensive, they also have, for example, 4000 cc engine. It is not a luxury, it's one way how to sirvive. In Kazakhstan, 9087 kilometers, or 43.1 percent of…
    • According to the site Zakon.kz, in Kazakhstan increasing in the range of over 3 up to 4 cause by ensuring a smooth growth and observance of the principle "Pollute more, pay more".Raising tax rates proposed to take the following gradation:-from 3.0 to 3.2 - 35 MCR (from 60 585…
  19. 869.

    The US federal government should privatize Social Security

    For

    • Let us get back to the debate. Contention 1: Harming Retirees My opponent argues that Privitazation would harm the retirees, but this is fallacous. I have shown last round they will be given an oppertunity to do with it as they please as they will have full ownership of the…
    • To clearify as my opponent has asked, Priviatization shall be the ending of Federal Control in Social Security and a phase out to private control in a 10 year peroid. People with money curently in federal funds shall have this transfered to the compan the client chooes. My…

    Against

    • Alright, thanks to lannan for kicking this off, and let's get started. Burdens: This debate hinges on the comparison of two cases. As the rules in R1 don't stipulate that I cannot run a counter plan, I am allowed to do so. It is my burden to prove that my case is superior to…
    • Thanks to lannan for engaging in this debate with me. It'll actually be my first time really arguing it (though I do agree with my position), so this should be interesting. I accept, and await his argument.
  20. 870.

    Institute a mandatory retirement age

    For

    • Dismantling gerontocracies
    • Maintaining access to pension and healthcare plans

    Against

    • Maintain the diversity of the labour market
    • Professional roles and professional knowledge
  21. 871.

    Tourism reduces the development gap between nations

    For

    • I accept. Me, as pro will argue why tourism reduces the development gap. I will list my arguments. I have the right to forfeit an round only if con fails to list a rebuttal to my point. I hope this is agreed. I will bring sources and evidence to support my points. I also seek…
    • Con forfeited this round.

    Against

    • Round 1- accepting it. Round 2- arguments Round 3- rebuttals Round 4- closing statements Definition of development gap:- Development Development means the way in which a country seeks to improve economically and raise the standard of living for its inhabitants. The Development…
  22. 872.

    The US should raise its debt ceiling, with or without concessions

    For

    • My opponent's arguments are extremely contradictory and leave me to question his understanding of the subject. He first argues that we should not raise the debt ceiling right now, implying that by not doing so Congress and the Obama administration will be forced to make the…
    • Thanks to Bluesteel for accepting.I will start off by making sure the resolution is clear by pointing out that I am referring to the debt ceiling vote as it is currently being discussed in congress. According to Tim Geithner, as it stands we have till Aug 2nd before the US will…

    Against

    • Thanks for the debate Double_R. My opponent was doing well until this last round, where he basically concedes all my arguments - all he does is repeat them back at me as questions. He never proves that privatizing Social Security would be bad, whereas I asserted that is the…
    • Groups all my opponent's arguments. If he's right that not raising the debt ceiling would be devastating, then the Republicans need to hold out for concessions. Only if their threat NOT to raise the debt is legitimate (instead of telling businesses that they were just bluffing)…
  23. 873.

    Unions should be made much easier to form

    For

    • You CANT have it BOTH ways. Either Unions are GOOD for employees or BAD, you don' get both. USUALLY the Republican talking point is that Unions are SO good to employees that it is IMPOSSIBLE to FIRE someone in a Union. First of all, i WISH that were the case, because employees…
    • Of course your WRONG! They HELP employees by getting them BETTER pay BETTER benefits and BETTER JOB SECURITY

    Against

    • Unions get more workers fired and less hired. When they force employers to give them higher wages and benefits, the end result is the employers being forced to give them less hours, lay off more, and hire less. Contrary to what Bernie Sanders wants you to believe, not all…
    • Unions hurt the job market. Especially teacher's unions, those should be completely abolished.
  24. 874.

    Government should adopt a laissez-faire economic approach

    For

    • Please excuse my super late reply, my internet is faulty. Also, please be nice. No one is trying to spear you with opinions and/or questioning your intellect so there's no need to be snippy. Its okay to have a strong opinion, but not to be rude about it. When I say Laissez…
    • Government should provide national security, and then back off. Road systems can be a private business. Hands off government would not deprive people of rights, it would increase them. Less political regulation would open up choices that before Americans never had because of…

    Against

    • i won't deny there is some benefit to a hands off approach. but it's not always the most efficient, and it doesn't always provide what's necessary to society. you still have not responded to my points about the poor earlier. food, health care, perhaps shelter. please refer to…
    • you did not respond to my points about the poor. or the creation and enforcement of environmental regulations and how it's not fair to just let what ever happen happen if people want to pollute our drinking water or our breathing air. about roads, who's going to ensure that the…
  25. 875.

    Minimum wage should be increased

    For

    • Minimum wage earners only represent 4% of the US workforce, and that's mostly comprised of teenagers. One might not suppose that adjusting the wage for this small sector would significantly impact the economy, but min. wage increases ripple up into middle class salaries as…
    • "According to a poll of 500 small business owners conducted on behalf of Small Business Majority, 67 percent of these firms favor boosting the minimum wage from the current rate of $7.25 an hour and adjusting it annually as the cost of living rises" [1] Why? Because savvy small…

    Against

    • But that's just it Pro those are polls. Ok so let me go with another statement. The more money given the more hours you lose.
    • Thank you for accepting.... You cant sit here and think that what pro is saying will relate to every business... That might work with big business because they can afford too. BUT think about the small family owned businesses, They don't have the money to be spending more money…
  26. 876.

    The US should raise the Social Security eligibility age

    For

    • Thank you Larztheloser for your response. "If you just got fired from your job for being grossly incompetent, that does not prove you have a disability." The point that I had been responding to was Con's point about excessively stiff joints or memory loss, not incompetence.…
    • First, a clarification of my viewpoint. The age of eligibility should be raised to 70, current beneficiaries will, for lack of a better term, be grandfathered in, and the age will be raised somewhat gradually, so people have time to change their expectations. Now onto the…

    Against

    • Pro's whole case rests on ONE unproven assumptionPro had the burden of proof, meaning he had to provide two things in this debate - a problem and a solution. His problem was a worker-beneficiary ratio of 2.1. But he has never justified WHY that is a problem. It is not enough to…
    • If you just got fired from your job for being grossly incompetent, that does not prove you have a disability. It certainly does not meant the US Social Security Administration's definition of one [1]. After all, it's not impossible for old people to keep working, it's just…
  27. 877.

    Governments should bail out struggling car companies

    For

    • I like to debate but to debate just for the sake of debating when I have had my mind changed by the opposition and no longer believe in my former clause is pointless.
    • <> < > These cases are true but you can't not criticize something just because it has been done before. If you kick someone in the foot and you hurt someone does that make it okay for someone to kick you in the foot? No. My opponent makes the Laissez-Faire economic system look…

    Against

    • I would like to extend my hand in friendship and welcome him to this debate site. I humbly thank my opponent for his excellent points and his polite attitude throughout this debate. It is a rare thing when someone not only remains polite throughout the proceedings of a debate,…
    • Let us now return to my opponents implied resolution and his corrections of it. 1. Our country (system) has operated under the laizze faire (let do) economic system for the past 200 years. "This is how our system has worked (and quite well I might add) for over 200 years. " My…
  28. 878.

    Fiscal and monetary stimulus benefits the economy during recessions

    For

    • blank
    • Well I'm very disappointed that WSA could not take up my challenge. I will not post anymore in this thread and will issue a second challenge with the same resolution to anyone else who wishes to argue on this topic.

    Against

    • Welcome to DDO, young Padawan.As an avid defender of freedom, sound economics, and morality, I accept this challenge as I love to debate with those deluded into religious and political dogma. Please accept this as a better stated, full resolution: Resolved: Government fiscal…
    • "Please accept this as a better stated, full resolution: Resolved: Government fiscal and monetary stimulus is a positive response to economic downturns."As we shall see later, the resolution is a bit vague for the sake of grabbing attention. Strictly speaking, there are certain…
  29. 879.

    The government should cut taxes for everyone, including the wealthy

    For

    • Let me rebut each of your arguments one by one. My oppenent's arguments are in bold.Cutting taxes for everyone would make sense if we weren't in over $16 trillion in debtThe government should significantly cut taxes but also significantly cut spending and close loopholes and…
    • The government should cut taxes for everyone including the wealthy so people will have more money, people will spend more, businesses will make more money and pay more tax dollars. A large percentage of businesses pay income tax at the individual tax rate not the corporate tax…

    Against

    • Arguments extended.
    • Tax cuts will pay for themselves/Tax hikes will reduce revenue:My opponent restates his argument from round one that tax cuts will pay for themselves through increased revenue. This is the idea behind the Laffer curve: that as tax rates increase the amount of taxes can…
  30. 880.

    Taxation should be voluntary for citizens

    For

    • Any dictionary definition of voluntary will include acting in one"s own free will, any threat of penalty voids an act being of free will. The IRS webpage on "Penalties for late filing" , uses the term penalty many times, not one person interacts with the IRS by their own free…
    • People are simply a group of persons. A simple majority, the key to democracy, is the goal of every politician. Using American political system as an example, in 2013, 47% of Americans are registered or lean democrat and 41% are registered or lean republican (Gallop).…

    Against

    • Your argument seems to suggest that if you are in a democracy, but you don't agree with everything the group does, then it must not be a democracy is silly. If you got married, would you expect to have it all go your way? Any time you have a group acting as one, someone will…
    • All that is interesting, but off point. The fact is that taxation is something we voluntarily impose on ourselves because we recognize the need. In that respect, in a democracy, all taxes are voluntary by the will of the people. There has been a concerted effort over the last…
  31. 881.

    A $15 federal minimum wage would do more harm than good

    For

    • I stand by my argument in the previous round
    • Though it is a good idea, I do not think this could work. My reasoning being: as soon as minimum wage increases, everything else will increase also. Ultimately the value of money would decrease, as all other prices increase. "In 2014, fast-food workers in the United States were…

    Against

    • Bernie Sanders $15 an Hour Plan - Will Cause More Good then Harm!I'm glad to accept this challenge and prove while Bernie Sanders plan, does more good than harm.
  32. 882.

    Airline flights should be taxed more heavily

    For

    • "Changing something in favor o something that isn't wildly accepted is ridiculous. "Thing is, most Americans (1), 85% to be precise, do beleive that global warming is real. The USA is a democratic country, which means that the majority rule- therefore initiating something due…
    • Thank-you. My first point is that air travel is a major contributor towards global warming and climate change. The emmission contains extremely harmful gases which damage our ozone layer. (3)As much as we can turn off our lights when we leave the room, or always recycle our…

    Against

    • My empirical evidence and my numbers coupled with the outstanding reason I presented have caused my opponent to forfeit. Extend All arguments.
    • 1) First of all, the USA is not a democracy, it is a Republic meaning we have rule by representatives. The majority does NOT rule. The popular vote isn't even the deciding factor in presidential elections so that statement is absolutely false. Let me clarify: the concept of…
  33. 883.

    Wealthy nations should send more aid to Africa

    For

    • Thank you Mongeese for posting this debate. Since my opponent provides no arguments i will focus on my own. Contention 1 Africa needs our support for diseases. 1 in 4 Africans have HIV or AIDS. providing funds to provide medicine and create knowledge for safe sex. If we provide…

    Against

    • Well, previous arguments extend. I guess I just continue to wait.
    • Previous arguments extend. Now to attack my opponent's points. "Africa needs our support for diseases. 1 in 4 Africans have HIV or AIDS. providing funds to provide medicine and create knowledge for safe sex. If we provide money for doctors and missionaries they will use it to…
  34. 884.

    Socialism is better for people than capitalism

    For

    • Socialism Is Better For the People than Capitalism. Let's face it. Capitalist countries: Poor or no poor. You can't afford it, you can afford it. Socialism shows the citizens that there are opportunities, such as hospital fees. Socialism doesn't just tell their citizens they…

    Against

    • See round 2 arguments. ..
    • This is unfortunate, but I'll take this opportunity for a rebuttal of sorts along with an extremely short discussion providing points of my own.Let's face it. Capitalist countries: Poor or no poor. You can't afford it, you can afford it.I honestly don't know what to say about…
  35. 885.

    Economic competition drives innovations that improve everyone's lives

    For

    • "If this argument were correct, products with major faults would stop being bought (XBox360 anyone?)" If you truly believe that the market doesn't punish companies who make faulty products then you are blind to how it operates - if Microsoft kept making products with faults, no…
    • " These competing companies will use their powerful marketing and advertising teams to push their own products, pouring millions or even billions of dollars into their images. The more fashionable something is (ie. higher demand) the more reason your capitalist corporations…

    Against

    • My round 4 argument will consist of my final rebuttals and my conclusion. …In its purest form, it is the only system that has worked. It is the only way in recorded history through which people have bettered themselves… As far as I'm concerned, the fact that there is no system…
    • Apple can put as many fancy adverts about apps for buying bananas as they like, but if the iPhone turns out to stop working after a day then who is going to believe the advert for the iPad? The company must provide a good product and the advertising will reflect this." If this…
  36. 886.

    The government should set a minimum wage

    For

    • Before going any further it should be noted by the judges that so far all of my opponent's arguments have involved perceived problems with introducing minimum wage laws or with increasing the minimum amount. All these arguments are essentially red herrings. Since Con…
    • Thanks L-F. This debate is for round two of the tournament organised by Freeman. The challenge was sparked off by a lively exchange in the forums which can be viewed here: http://www.debate.org... I accept that as Pro, I have the burden of proving that the benefits of the…

    Against

    • 1. Contrary to Pro's claims, I never said that there is a fixed, hard and fast marginal productivity for each worker, or that other factors, such as efficiency or cost of materials, do not affect the output of workers. I merely claim that the labor of workers produces some…
    • Resolution: The minimum wage is, overall, a good policy. I will be defending the position that it is, overall, a bad policy. (That is, a minimum wage having any economic effect, not a minimum wage too low to have any effect at all). 1) There exists a marginal productivity…
  37. 887.

    High tax rates hurt the economy

    For

    • Defending My Own ArgumentsMy opponent argues that the only reason people earn money is to improve their own standard of living. We agree on this. My opponent also points out that things like Environment and Crime Rates affect standard of living. This is true. However, this does…
    • I argue that high tax rates do hurt the economy. I will employ both theoretical and empirical support for this assertion. Why High Taxes Hurt The Economy? Higher tax rates hurt the economy because they discourage productive behavior. If labor taxes were to be higher, then labor…

    Against

    • First I will address his, then introduce my own. In terms of the setting of this debate, I think it should be applied to every country, not just the USA, because every country faces the trade off of high and low taxation. Pro 1. Reduced reward means less productivityThis…
    • I accept
  38. 888.

    Trade unions should lose all collective bargaining rights

    For

    • Collective bargaining leades to pay crises in the public sector
    • Collective bargaining undermines the democractic process

    Against

    • Collective bargaining has been recognised as an enforcable right
    • Collective bargaining is a necessary aspect of democracy
  39. 889.

    Capitalism is superior to other economic systems

    For

    • Capitalism : " an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market." (1)…
    • Sorry for the delay. I will give my opponent the oppertunity to go first in this debate as I will not need that more than one argument to debate this topic.

    Against

    • Unfortunately, his proposition is based on a false premise and furthermore a system that will likely be limited to our era and technology. The false premise of the supremacy of capitalism is that we live in a world of unlimited resources. We obviously do not. Capitalism has…
    • I am not sure what you are comparing it to. If you are comparing it to any other system, and not limiting to me a specific system, I will argue it is not superior and will argue why in the following rounds.
  40. 890.

    Sarbanes-Oxley and similar legislation should be repealed

    For

    • >Are you saying that there should be no law against falsifying financial statements? Advertisements employ the art of persuasion, where rhetoric and innuendo are appropriate. Financial statements should be factually accurate by law because altering them with incorrect…
    • Thank you, DarrowDobaksa, for taking up this debate. I do, however, disagree with your disagreement on several of my points. :) >It merely says, if you're going to do business in this country, you're going to do it honestly and fairly... or else. Why must those statements be…

    Against

    • Thank you. Your points are marked as >>. >>Why must those statements be honest by law? Is it because they are economically potent? Then pretty much every advertisement would be banned. Are you saying that there should be no law against falsifying financial statements?…
    • Thank you for the opportunity. However, I disagree with your argument on several points. Your first claim is that corporate failures are not a social cost. This proposition assumes that SOX was designed to prevent corporate failures, but such is not the case. Corporations can…
  41. 891.

    Society will become socialist within ten years

    For

    • I became a socialist in 1977 when i visited family in the netherlands western europe is a example of peaceful democratic and successful socialism
    • Firstly, The record of Socialsim is mixed, And understandably so, It is a new idea and just being tried as people make mistakes they learn, Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting diffeent results, So we try some thing new t attain the same goals, We learn…

    Against

    • It may be mixed with some few, Few examples of it going right but it's past is full of the death of innocent people and the destruction of nations. China is not a socialist country, It is a mixed nation, Leaning toward more capitalistic economic views and beliefs. This is the…
    • I do not believe that socialism will take hold anywhere else in the next 10 years or anytime after that. Just because we are a divided world does not mean that Socialism will take over. The history of the system is very terrible. Not only that but other economic systems prove…
  42. 892.

    Governments should expand exploitation of unconventional oil

    For

    • Unconventional oil is economically viable
    • Unconventional oil can contribute to 'energy security'

    Against

    • Unconventional oil is hazardous for the environment
    • Unconventional oil increases climate change
  43. 893.

    Capitalism cannot meet human needs without some socialist policies

    For

    • "an economic theory or system in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange are owned by the community collectively, usually through the state. It is characterized by production for use rather than profit, by equality of individual wealth, by the absence of…
    • "It would be helpful for us to look at what we must assume from his resolution to be a better alternative, i.e. the socialist model." If you would read the resolution I am not favoring socialism by itself but a mixture of certain tenets of both systems. "Although not a perfect…

    Against

    • In this debate my opponent asserts that there are socialist policies that must be combined with the capitalist system to prevent some sort of errors that he deems are inherent in the nature of capitalism. My opponent neglects to actually identify which part of socialist…
    • There does seem to be some poor communication. Your resolution does indeed bring in "socialism" as a means to deal with what you deem as a shortfall of capitalism. You further defined socialism and we agreed to this definition in both PM and on this debate. Now I expect to use…
  44. 894.

    Trade with nations that use child labor should be halted

    For

    • Ok if you must..well done!
    • Ok very strange however conceading is i suppose in the eye of the beholder.

    Against

    • My opponent has automatically conceded. Round 1 was acceptance ONLY. He began by stating an argument. That argument was that we need fair trade. Con wins automatically Conduct and convincing arguments points go to con.
  45. 895.

    Shoe companies should make fewer lace-up shoes and more Velcro

    For

    • I will go straight down the flow. CONTENTION 1: Ease. My opponent suggests that, in order to gain ankle support, a lot of velcro would be needed, and it would slip. First of all, I urge him to back these statements up with evidence. Secondly, look at these velcro shoes (.…
    • I ask that voters based on who made the better arguments, and that you put your personal opinion aside. With that said, let's explore the reasons why Velcro is better than shoe-laces. CONTENTION 1: Ease. It is extremely easy to tighten and pull over a peice of Velcro to the…

    Against

    • My opponent has listed sites where you can purchase shoes, That is fine but just because people make these items does not mean that they are good better or even equal to the vast number of laced shoes on the market. Velcro shoes had their shot they were alive in the early…
    • First and foremost thank you for putting up this interesting and wacky debate topic. Though there are a few minor merits to the use of velcro I will show that lacing is vastly superior. CONTENTION 1: Ease. Though my opponent would have you believe it is easier to use velcro on…
  46. 896.

    Africa's natural resources leave its people worse off

    For

    • Resources are a source of conflict
    • Environmental Damage

    Against

    • Natural resources create employment
    • Source of trade
  47. 897.

    A national sales tax would reboot the American economy

    For

    • The first thing I would like to address is Rezamee"s Counter 4 from Round 3 that I was unable to respond to last round because I ran out of time. The simple truth of my position that prices would drop comes from the economic principle of inputs and outputs. A corporation is a…
    • As Rezamee mentioned in the last round, I omitted to reply to his point that no nation had ever imposed a national sales tax. That is largely true although several nations such as Iceland, Norway, and South Africa attempted to implement a national retail sales tax. No nation…

    Against

    • I would like to mention my opponent has dropped his argument that there should be a 13% national tax rate, it has been forgotten for several rounds (Cameron Round One). This is especially amazing since the 13% tax rate was one of the core essentials of his primary argument. In…
    • Definitions: Wealth Inequality: Wealth inequality in the United States (also known as the wealth gap) refers to the unequal distribution of assets among residents of the United States. Wealth includes the values of homes, automobiles, personal valuables, businesses, savings,…
  48. 898.

    Free movement of labour across Africa would reduce poverty disparities

    For

    • The freedom to move is a human right.
    • Policies towards a free labour market will create unity.

    Against

    • Urbanisation without industrialisation, the dangerous livelihoods of migrants.
    • Who is left behind?
  49. 899.

    Free-market capitalism is better than socialism

    For

    • 1.Happiness is a personal responsibility so that argument is invalid and do you know who the happiest people are if you asked them the North Koreans because they have been brainwashed to believe that they live in a socialist utopia even when kim jong il is spending millions on…
    • Look at history every communist state has failed or is failing there are 3 communist states in the world and 2 (Cuba and china) are embracing some free market reforms If the consumer has a choice of what product to buy then the many firms that are competing to sell the product…

    Against

    • Actually, I wasn't speaking of North Korea, but rather Denmark. What you think is right is what is right for you, not the North Koreans. In the same respect Americans and Europeans are "brainwashed" just as much. Neither is right or wrong. It's hard to put oneself in anothers…
    • In the same respect, look at America. Clearly the free market has horrid flaws for the economy is in shambles. THe US is greatly indebted to China, who doesn't practice the free market to the extent that the US has. The free market itself is incredibly corrupted, with big…
  50. 900.

    Carbon pricing would benefit the United States economy

    For

    • Resolved: Carbon pricing would have a very minimal economic impact in the United StatesDefinitions:Carbon Pricing: The generic term for placing a price on carbon through either subsidies, a carbon tax, or an emissions trading systemhttp://en.wikipedia.org...Round one will be…
    • Would Carbon Pricing have a Large Impact on Household Prices? In the previous round, my opponent stated, "The very goal of Carbon Pricing is to increase household prices." This simply is not true. Effective carbon pricing systems do increase the price of fossil-fuel generated…

    Against

    • I accept, and Look Forward to this debate
    • The Revenue From Carbon Pricing Will not Reduce Household CostsThe central point of my opponents argument is that the revenue resulting from Carbon Pricing will offset the increase in costs. First, let me explain my original argument like this: 1) The goal of Carbon Pricing is…

How to use these debate topics

  • Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
  • Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
  • Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.

Run them live

Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.

Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?

More question collections

Questions adapted from args.me corpus (CC BY 4.0), edited for clarity. This collection may be reused under the same terms — see sources & licenses.