Economy Debate Topics — page 15
1,397 debate topics, all ages. Debatable motions with arguments for and against. Open the arguments below, pick one at random, or present them full-screen.
- 701.
Economies should combine capitalism and socialism
For
- 1. "Capitalism is the only system allowing humans to succeed. It also allows for entrepreneurs and a more competitive environment - which will bring in more money into the economy." Seems a bit biased. Take Tallahassee, for example. We have a mix of socialism and capitalism. It…
- Mixing these two economic structures would make almost everyone happy. Capitalism and Socialism. Some people could trade and barter. While we could still have competitive supermarkets and private property. People could go by their beliefs no matter what! There will always be…
Against
- Your initial proposal of combining the systems, is still largely based on socialistic principles. You simply thought that combining the two systems, and I quote, "will make almost everyone happy." With what proof? Later on you mentioned "There will always be conflict." Your…
- First off, we will have to look at what the intended outcome of the system(s) will be. Both capitalism and socialism are economic structures, and the goal of an EFFECTIVE economic structure is to ensure economic growth. Capitalism is the only system allowing humans to succeed.…
- 702.
Greater equality leads to greater national wealth
For
- Yes, there is always going to be an income inequality gap. People spending years studying while others party has very little to do with that gap. The equality gap shouldn't be growing, it should be shrinking. That means something is wrong. You sound like a McCarthy era…
- We also hear a lot of propaganda about miracle drugs and everything else under the sun. Class warfare has become necessary. Your challenge is simple. Once a country becomes "Socialistic" those who were at the bottom would inevitably have a higher standard of living than they…
Against
- The equality gap should be growing at a rapid pace in the USA. It sold out the manufacturing base that held jobs that paid good wages for little skill. As millions of immigrants are added every year with millions still unemployed, we see a flooded labor market. That means…
- There is an income inequality gap because that is life. Some people spend years studying while others party every day. Why don't the Democrats or Communists want to promote real social justice?
- 703.
Africa is genuinely rising
For
- Foreign Direct Investment to the continent has increased
- Africa's Economies are growing rapidly
Against
- War and Civil unrest disrupt development and economic growth
- Majority of states are still undemocratic
- 704.
Governments should pay homemakers for unpaid domestic work
For
- In conclusion I would like to present a summary of my points and counter arguments. Housewives should be paid by the government because they experience higher amounts of stress than women who work, Being near children for mothers causes three times as much stress than fathers,…
- I going to start off by saying that I never wrote that women on maternity leave are housewives. I simply said that they should also be paid by the government because it would benefit both them and employers. You also said that they are employed, But this is only a technicality.…
Against
- I apologise, I think you misunderstood part of my last argument. Women on maternity leave, As I mentioned before, Are not housewives, As they don't choose to leave work. Their child is born, And so they get a few weeks off. This isn't usually something that'll happen more than…
- Coincidentally this is also my first debate, So I guess that way we're both newbies. Welcome! As in introduction to my argument I would like to question your definition of "housewives". You state that, When deciding which women should be payed by the government, Women on…
- 705.
The US should overhaul its tax system
For
- My opponent is correct in that the tax system does in fact bring the government revenue, which it then goes and spends on various programs. the point he is trying to bring in is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". or It does what its supposed to, so we shouldn't mess with it.…
- I am here today to stand in affirmation of the topic: the US should change its tax system. I do so because not only is the current tax system nigh impossible for the average American to decipher on his/her own, but it is also designed for a economic situation that the United…
Against
- Ok as far as the screen shot I do kind of want to see it because I know what debaters will do to win lol. Also I am worried I will miss some of his points because they arent able to be seen under previous arguements so I cant respond as well. However he does first argue that…
- His whole arguement about it being too complex is false, people can do it if they chose, because every page isnt needed to file a personal tax return. Also even if it is to complex you can chose to hire an accountant, this stimulates the economy by providing jobs. He says that…
- 706.
Government intervention in the economy is necessary
For
- (See above.)
- (See above.)
Against
- I have to respectfully forfit from this debate due to computer troubles. I would not be able to fairly have a discussion with you due to my computer troubles. Please forgive me. Thank you for your understanding.
- Welcome to this debate on the economy & economics. The debate is "We need Government Intervention in the economy", in the form of things such as subsidies, bailouts, central banks, deficit spending, wage controls, but overall, just economic planning. I will be argue against…
- 707.
Free markets should operate with minimal government intervention
For
- The free market is morally superior because it operates on liberty
- The free market is the most efficient way to match supply and demand
Against
- The free market fails in providing public and common goods
- The free market degrades human dignity
- 708.
There should be a single flat tax rate for everyone
For
- If you're not going to actually debate with saliant and sensible points then there's no debate to lose. And I didn't insult you. Personal or otherwise. Simply expressed my disappointment at the lack of effort to give any substantive argument. But hey ho. Whatever helps you…
- It's disappointing that my first debate on here has been with someone who should be debating in a different category. 1. The point is that you accepted this for a laugh. 2. The poor can afford to pay the same percentage as the rich. Most poor people in the western world have…
Against
- If you have to resort to personal insults, you've lost the argument :) G'day.
- 1. You don't get the point. 2. The poor can't afford to pay the same percentage as the rich. 3. Although the lump sum may be more for the rich, the point is that the rich can pay for a higher percentage. 4. This would mean an increase of tax on the poor which is rude 5. If…
- 709.
The estate tax should be eliminated
For
- The estate tax is a tax imposed on property which is transferred to another upon the said person becoming deceased. However, this tax should be eliminated from the American government which is in place to simply make the government richer. As stated by presidential candidate…
Against
- Unfortunately, my opponent has failed to post a response past his original piece. I've illustrated my points while discrediting my opponent's. Thank you for your votes. Hopefully my second debate will be better than this one! Happy new year, everyone!
- I will make no further arguments since my opponent has faied to respond. Dan, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that due to the holidays and everything, perhaps it's difficult to make a timely post. Hope you can at least show up for round three. Otherwise, it may be…
- 710.
Capitalist societies are better than socialist ones
For
- Basically most of your argument reviles around fairness and failure. Banks doing dumb things, Sweden etc. Here's the beauty of a capitalist society, if you fail it is still possible for rising. If you fail in a socialist society the government turns around and helps you. That…
- As you know capitalism makes free trade. Here is milton Freidman on capitalism: http://www.youtube.com... First of all, capitalism is better for an economy. How you may ask? Because it creates competition. Competition makes better quality goods for cheaper. Here's why: My…
Against
- Nobody wants to see big corporations kill small corporations and Socialism would not fix that at all. I concede that but I reinforce my point that It is a woe that affects Capitalism far more than it affects socialism Why do I have to provide a source for something that is…
- You offer some good points against socialism, let me first offer some points against capitalism. Capitalism results in two things, competition (which the pro mentioned), and profit Look in the news in any site and you will find a story of how a company went to extreme lengths…
- 711.
Viacom should not pull its channels over customers refusing higher bills
For
- please belive me on this one Dou you wanna pay more on your bill if you have direct tv think about it
- ok direct tv is completely innocent on this you see according to the when direct tv drop's website they said 26 channels were dropped this is true if your counting the hd and sd channels together second of all for Viacom removed the daily show and the Colbert report off hulu…
Against
- Of course I don't want to, but the bill per customer only rose a few cents, and is still under 3 dollars a month, so it isn't that much at all. However this debate isn't over whether or not customers want to pay more for services. This is about whether or not Viacom should pull…
- I'll begin with my argument and then I'll move to refuting Pro'smy caseMy argument is a simple one, so I'll keep it quick (it doesn't hurt that I can only type for five minutes without having to get off due to a virus). In America, we do our best to maintain a capitalistic free…
- 712.
Foreign direct investment is a net benefit for developing countries
For
- I think Foreign Direct Investment is a blessing in disguise because it increases the host countries economy and generates jobs. Visit this link and follow the blog for detailed study on FDI- www.abhimanyusethia.tk and search for the article on FDI
Against
- All points extended.
- FDI's can do horrible things. They rob the local economy by destroying local shops and buisnesses. It does this by underselling local buisnesses at price competition that they cannot afford. Plus all the profits go back to their homeland instead of staying in the local…
- 713.
The unemployed should be required to work for welfare benefits
For
- Workfare breaks the dependency culture
- Workfare will eliminate scroungers, who are a financial drain on the system
Against
- Workfare schemes limit the opportunities to look for work
- Workfare does not help people get jobs
- 714.
Inheritance taxes should be abolished
For
- ----Tanks---- Thanks for the compliment brian_eggleston. You have been quite the formidable opponent, so I means a lot coming from you. I appreciate it. ----Counterarguments and Conclusion---- My opponent begins his argument by asserting that money inherited from the death tax…
- ----Flawed Premise Redux---- In the comments section of this debate, my opponent has indicated that his premise was comically inspired. Phew!-- Imagine my relief to know that one of my fellow debaters wasn't actually being scammed! I will be able to sleep well now. Hurray!…
Against
- First of all, I would like to congratulate my opponent on the consistently high quality of his debate. I mean this quite genuinely, and I hope I don't appear to be patronising, but this is especially outstanding as my opponent is still just a teenager (as he pointed out in the…
- Thanks for taking the debate, PoeJoe. My opponent's first point was the premise for the debate is flawed because the West African executor of wills I used as an example was likely to be a fraudster. This is a slur on the Nigerian legal profession! But never mind that, the…
- 715.
Personal retirement accounts should replace entitlement programs
For
- Thanks for your fast response. Rebuttals R1: Personal Accounts Generate Higher Returns "Flaw 1: Gov't has lower risk, shares are known to be a higher return, higher risk instrument." All financial instruments have risk, we both know this. For the stock market, it's fluctuations…
- Thanks for accepting. As per say the resolution, I will advance the notion that personal accounts should be used for personal retirement security rather than government entitlement programs. C1: Personal Accounts Generate Higher Returns Social Security has an annual rate of…
Against
- Well lets get straight into this R1: Personal Accounts Generate Higher Returns "Flaw 1: Gov't has lower risk, shares are known to be a higher return, higher risk instrument. " My opponent has failed to understand the point. All financial instruments have risks but some higher…
- As a non-US citizen I will be attacking my opponent"s case primarily on theory and logic rather than specific American rules/laws/schemes. I will therefore not be using many/any sources and will be giving/supplying my own ideas. I leave it to the voters to decide if the logic…
- 716.
Charities should be required to prove how donations are spent
For
- Every year in the UK, the two leading charities( Comic relief and Children in need) organise a fund raiser in the form of a TV program. Throughout the show which usually lasts a few hours; they raise millions and millions. Every year these charities raise over 30-40 million:…
Against
- Well that's disappointing.
- Pro has failed to respond so i'll wait and see if he comes back.
- 717.
Concentrating wealth among the rich benefits the economy
For
- http://www.bloomberg.com... The effects of the austerity are questioned, as another country is out performing Greece, and some feel Greece needed tougher reforms. Your mistaking the recent IMF statement about what should be done in certain instances, and they are placing a…
- I had no idea I was suppose to wright a research paper. This is a debate, and I have never seen a debate where people cite sources. First off you miss the point of the debate you challenged me to. " I trust the rich, before I trust the government ",said me. The Depression was…
Against
- At this point, I would like to remind Pro that he is to post "no round as agreed upon" for the final round to ensure that we both have the same amount of arguments. "I had no idea I was suppose to wright a research paper. This is a debate, and I have never seen a debate where…
- "I wonder why you chose a graph that starts with 1945. That is very misleading as to the history of tax rates in the US. When people can't buy things they need for many years , such as the time of WWII, A huge boom would follow in the economy would follow." That simply happens…
- 718.
A single consumption tax should replace all other taxes
For
- I will begin by stating that I am more than willing to change my mind on any topic, So long as there is substantial evidence that my opinion is flawed. With that being said, I wish my fellow debater the best of luck- see you in the next round. First off, For those of you that…
Against
- Opponent has forfeited the debate. My conclusions in R1 remain unchallenged. May your thoughts be clear, -Thoht
- Passing this round so hopefully my opponent responds.
- 719.
Taxation is morally justified
For
- Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited. Extending all arguments.
- Unfortunately my opponent has forfeited his opening round. Per the resolution, I will be arguing that taxes are in fact morally justified. To begin, I"ll present a few definitions: Tax " "a sum of money demanded by a government for its support for special facilities or…
Against
- Resolution: Taxes are Morally JustifiedThe burden of proof will lie solely on Pro.
- 720.
Southeastern China should prioritize heavy industry over light industry
For
- Unfortunately, my opponent's account remains inactive, and as such, I have no choice but to skip this round as well. I hope that my opponent can return to DDO for a rematch when circumstances allow.
- Regrettably, it seems that my opponent has deactivated. I do hope he can return to DDO and complete our debate, should he have sorted out whatever issues are keeping him away.
Against
- Thank you for the challenge. I hope this will be a fruitful debate. First, I would like to dispute the definitions my opponent provides: Southeast China, in my opinion, should include Guangdong and Fujian, but should also contain Jiangxi, Hunan and Guangxi province. The…
- 721.
The US should ban trade with China
For
- If people have no job inflation doesnt matter. Can't afford anything."US image". The US is not a middle school student. We should look out for our own best interests, our image be damned.Equal rights is about US citizens and ppl who live here. It doesn't require us to treat…
- 1. Inflation isnt a problem if people are making >$. Inflation can be tiny but if all jobs r overseas they cant make $ & the low inflation rate does no good. If we ban trade w/China > jobs will b in the US so ppl will have > chances 2 make >$ 2. Trade alters the economy for…
Against
- As a conclusion I'd like to review my main points:1. Banning trade increases inflation.2. The US image depends on our policy of free trade.3. Trading with China is part of equal rights treatments and is also shown in the Constitution. My opponent has forfeited a round and I'd…
- Given that Pro has forfeited this round, I will give my rebuttals to his points. 1. Pro's first point actually supports me. The poor human rights record provides even more the reason to trade with China. As China merchants get richer, the border control and human right control…
- 722.
The federal minimum wage should not rise to $15 an hour
For
- A note before beginning. Romanii made a mistake in his last round. His last source was supposed to be source 8: https://www.fas.org...I ask the voters not to hold this against my opponent. The reason for this being that I forgot to link my last two sources in R2, but was able…
- R1: Increased Consumption.This claim has already been debunked in My P2: Annual Wages case. Increased Consumption means increased spending. The GDP is merely a measurement of the movement of currency in a nation, aka spending. In R2, I gave evidence that minimum wage increases…
Against
- Thanks to LordHelm for what has been a great debate! == HARMS ==1. UnemploymentIt is unfortunate that Pro has opted to waste so much of his final round trying to refute 2 of the studies I cited -- his efforts amount to virtually nothing, because I also cited more than 90 other…
- Thanks, Pro. Due to time constraints, I'm only going to be using this round for rebuttals. == Unemployment == A large part of Pro's case is based on the premise that an increase in MW will result in higher unemployment rates. However, his primary strategy for proving this is to…
- 723.
Capitalism benefits national economies more than alternatives
For
- This is my first debate on this site and I hope I can do well on it. First off, I'd like to give the basic definitions of both Capitalism and Socialism to prevent any bias and have the two of us start on an equal ground. Capitalism is defined as an economic system which…
- To anyone here who wants to have a friendly debate with about whether or not Capitalism can benefit the economy of a economically-crippled nation, I can open to whoever accepts. Stage 1: Accceptance Stage 2: Providing your arugments Stage 3: Providing your arguments Stage 4:…
Against
- I will give my point of view and remark on my opponents claims. ==Against Capitalism== One problem I have with capitalism is that it promotes marketing yourself (or your product), which promotes consumerism, which promotes the sense of "I need it" entitlement that is prevalent…
- I accept! Capitalism does not benefit an economy! GL. I wait your reply!
- 724.
Capitalism works well
For
- The point of that round was to make a argument against my claim that capitalism works well and for me to work from that. Thats just how some people debate. This should have been writ You have realy wasted my time, and i would appreciate if you actualy argued next round.
- People say capitalism is evil and only supported by greedy scumbags. They are wrong.
Against
- Oops.
- Those are just the opinions of some people, but that's not necessarily a valid argument to defend capitalism, you could've brought sources and made a huge, almost essay-like argument about it, defending it. I am waiting.
- 725.
The federal income tax should be abolished
For
- i didn't say taxes would make people not work. i said they would go overseas and they have. that's where manufacturing jobs have gone. a sales tax is not regressive because there is a prebate that ensures that poor people are untaxed and many goods, like food, are exempted.…
- when you tax something, you discourage it. you discourage productivity, savings and innovation and ship jobs overseas. we pay taxes on everything we do and the government has an exclusive privilege to our property. we want to encourage production, so we should not tax it.…
Against
- High cost of labor sends jobs overseas. Employers don't pay income taxes. Sales taxes are in fact regressive (1) whether or not you exempt products like food. Low spending does result in low GDP. That's just basic economics. GDP= NX+consumer spending+g+i. You can't just say…
- My opponents argument simply doesn't make sense. He argues that income taxes discourage the earning of income. Would you really think to yourself There's no point to working because I'm only getting paid 40k annually, instead of 45k anually!No!Pro proposes a very high sales…
- 726.
Taxes should depend on people's outward appearance
For
- Let me just ask you this: do you want some retarded Jew to be rich, or some creepy kid with freckles to rule the world? No; we need polar bears to rule the world
- You barely said anything. We are on debate #13. Let's hear what you have to say? Taxing people based on their appearance is how the government makes money.
Against
- They can't do a very good job at it, considering they're animals.
- No, the government makes money by taxing people based on their income. They then redistribute those taxes to people who need money. You're insane.
- 727.
Chevrolet is better than Ford
For
- F- found O- on R- road D- dead D- driver r- returns o- on f- foot
- http://www.laughfactory.com...
Against
- Is Chevy better than Ford
- C-cheapest H-heap E-ever V-visioned Y-yet
- 728.
Going to college is not financially worth it
For
- Oh no...
- It is worth it to go to college, and I will explain why it is worth it in the second round of the debate. Yes, I will post arguments using mathematical sense. Sincerely, Dr. Maniac
Against
- It seems you have misunderstood me. Notice how you are debating the Pro for the statement 'Going to college is financially not worth it' meaning you are debating that it is not worth it to go to college.
- We are debating whether or not it makes economic sense to go to college, in other words whether or not college will create a net-income gain or a net-income loss. Arguments should be based in statistics and mathematics and not in strict opinion.
- 729.
Libertarian economics and pure capitalism have major flaws
For
- Although I did not think that clarification was necessary, I will humor my opponent and attempt to describe to him my point regarding Corporate aristocracy in a way that he will hopefully find easier to understand. I'll begin by talking about corporate person-hood. A corporate…
- I would like to begin by refuting my opponents counter contentions, and then re-affirming my own contentions. To begin I would like to address my opponents example of hereditary aristocracy. Although he makes a fine point against individuals, he fails to address the possibility…
Against
- This has been my first real debate and I've enjoyed it immensely. Thank you for taking the time to have such a thoughtful discussion! Corporations may have some legal status as persons, (I don't agree with this classification, but that's beside the point) but this does not mean…
- My apologies, I did not mean to suggest that my opponent was advocating pure socialism, I was merely trying to point out that oligarchy and aristocracy are in fact more of a problem with other economic systems, and therefore even if they were natural outgrowths of libertarian…
- 730.
Tax rates should be progressive, with higher earners paying more
For
- 1) I agree. 2) This is where it get difficult. 2.1) Thank you for accusing me of never doing taxes, shows how accusatory you are. The funny thing is, your claim that I have never done my taxes is rested upon the fact that I claimed we did not have a progressive tax system.…
- Well, I am not the best at openings however I will begin with this: The fact is flat tax does nothing in alleviating wealth inequalities; moreover, it also benefits the rich and hence the flat-tax is an unsuitable replacement for our progressive tax system. I will further prove…
Against
- think verb 1. have a particular opinion, belief, or idea about someone or something. "she thought that nothing would be the same again" synonyms: believe, be of the opinion, be of the view, be under the impression; Just thought I'd bring your attention to this word, since I…
- Thank you for accepting the challenge. I'm a noob here, so I need to get my three debates in to vote! As someone pointed out in the comments, we would be both arguing in favor of a Progressive Tax considering that our current tax system is in fact a Progressive Tax system.…
- 731.
Cheap food in America is good for Americans
For
- All in all, I have one problem with your arguement: Eating cheap fast-food will make us fat. This is untrue one because there are plenty of cheap, healthy choices out there and two you don't know that they will choose the double cheeseburger or Big Mac, as you mentioned before.…
- 1) Can I see proof? (: and also, because these people are spending less on food, they have a better chance of buying a house, getting a job, etc. etc., and rebuilding the economy. 2)If it is too unhealthy, where do you suggest Americans buy cheap, fast, food? Also, Americans…
Against
- "1) Can I see proof? (: and also, because these people are spending less on food, they have a better chance of buying a house, getting a job, etc. etc., and rebuilding the economy." "The Omnivores Dilemma", by Michael Pollan. It is a book about human eating, and includes facts…
- Yes, I am talking about fast food restaurants in that statement, though I am also referring to other cheap foods. The reason this food is so cheap is because these food companies purchase them for low prices from corn farmers. The only reason the corn farmers sell them for so…
- 732.
The US should grant oil reserve rights to just two companies
For
- --- "you're saying that unemployment is bad, but making more unemployment is good. Bigger companies would NOT take the hit, because there'd be two large companies - much like pepsi and coke - who completely dominate the industry." + No. I am saying that the oil companies' high…
- --- "we should [not] give two companies a larger competitive edge over smaller companies, which will, in turn, be forced to lower their gas prices...Smaller, less-wealthy companies, will not be able to make this shift, forcing them to either A) be bought out by another company…
Against
- "I'm willing among with probably the vast masjority of Americans to see the smaller oil companies pack their bags in an effort to put more money in America's economy and loosen our dependence on foreign oil. I understand what you're saying and I've thought about it a lot. But…
- I negate the resolution that, "America should use its oil reserves and give them to only two companies" Before I begin making my own case, I'd like to start with my opponents. "Those two companies will have competitive prices, avoiding a monopoly. And other gas companies will…
- 733.
More free-market capitalism will worsen the US economy
For
- con argues taxing the rich more doesn't help the lower class. it does, because they dont have to pay the taxes to support the programs being run. and, some of the programs directly benefit them such as food stamps etc. con argues taxing the rich more will just cause them to…
- my opening argument will be mostly borrowed from a recent article: US Set to Become the Newest Third World Country http://iacknowledge.net... "The United States, the home of Capitalism, is about to demonstrate its ultimate failure, as the cannibalistic economic system consumes…
Against
- It seems I am actually able to debate but it seems I do not need to. I carry on previous statements and ask people to vote, no matter who they choose.
- To start, I apologize for I will be unable to debate the final round but do not concede. I simply carry this and the round before it to the last. Now to the debate at hand: "Con argues taxing the rich more doesn't help the lower class. it does, because they dont have to pay the…
- 734.
Governments should privatize national roadways
For
- The United States Government should allow for privitization of all federal roadways. Privitization refers to the private buisness sector run by individuals or groups. The federal department of transportation will oversee this venture. A. this will include repair work on…
- Before you jump to conclusions about cost please consider the idea of market competition and the amount you already pay in taxes for roads. Already you pay about 40 cents per gallon in taxes for roads and maintenance. This means you pay about 25 dollars per month for road use.…
Against
- Privatizing all the roads most certainly wont lead to the solution to traffic problems. Businesses care about making money first, second, and third, and everything else is just a side project. Building roads is monstrously expensive and they arent money makers either, so there…
- fantastic
- 735.
Capitalism is a harmful ideology
For
- Hey sorry for not posting in time. I'm in finals week and I've been kind of been beat up by tests. But to start this out, I'll be giving a overview on this debate than I'll give ya'll a line by line on his arguments. We can see in our day to day lives that capitalism is bad.…
- Hello my name is Alex and I will be serving as the pro in this debate. Capitalism is a bad ideology because it allows for individuals to turn our heads away from the pain and suffering of others only to further our own cause. Take Sub Saharan Africa for example. Millions of…
Against
- As this has kind of been a makeshift debate, I'll attempt to reassert the arguments/responses from the entire thing. In creating a state, people rely on others for certain goods and services that each provides. Soon, it becomes obvious that some tasks need to be performed.…
- YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE DEBATE!!!! Just kidding, I hate it when people do that. It sucks you got cut off. Just reitterate my last post. Also, remember that capitalism isn't responsible for the moral decisions of actors in it. These moral atrocities happen in every…
- 736.
Capitalist profit results from exploiting workers
For
- Instead of arguing individual points, I will now attempt to make a closing statement and hopefully this is proper netiquette in online debates. If I am misunderstanding or misusing the debating norms, please accept my apologies. My opponent has put forth three arguments in…
- 1.1.Unfortunately Con does not seem to understand the scientific theory well enough to use it in an argument. First he claims that I have the burden of proof to show scientific evidence but does not deem to say what scientific evidence and for what he requires them. He is free…
Against
- Pro's theory is that all profit derives from the exploitation of labor. To prove his theory he must show that no value accrues from the time value of money, the assumption of risk, or the creative genius of the entrepreneur. The arguments in favor of the value of each of these…
- Profits are not exploitation of workers for three reasons (1) money has time value, (2) increased risk merits increased rewards, (3) and creative genius adds value that should be rewarded. All of Pro's contrary arguments are based upon abstract theory that have no confirmation…
- 737.
Taxpayers should not fund assistance for the poor
For
- Taxpayers should not be paying for the poor. The people who pay these taxes, work for their money and it should not be that from the money of hardworking people, we should pay for poor people who refuse to find a job. I am not saying we shouldn't help the poor. However, the…
Against
- My case shall take the form of two different arguments:1. Refute the opponents case2. Show how my opponent doesn't actually affirm the resolution. I shall go in order. "We shouldn't pay for people who don't have a job because they don't wanna have a job! "Hey thanks for this.…
- Dumb troll. Didn't want to actually debate. Extend all arguments.
- 738.
Low-paid workers work harder than high-paid workers
For
- I have not been a doctor or nurse but I have spent much time around them as one of my children was very sick and nearly died. I was by his side for a long time and saw the effort put in by nurses as apposed to the doctors. The nurses put in at least 200 times the amount of…
- Your argument implies that a person should be paid according to how much education and training they receive. Education is a privilege that few people have available to them. Billions of hard working people all over the earth are being paid miniscule wages while many of the…
Against
- Firstly, do not project any of your arguments into me. It's ignorant and aggressive. You do not know anything about me or my life or my "unjustified income". Your issue is due to a chip on your shoulder, cause of I will not begin to guess. It is impolite. To say we should…
- No my argument does not imply that. You said nurses work harder than doctors. Have YOU been a nurse AND a doctor? I wouldn't think so. How can you possibly compare one profession against another. It is ignorance at best. I agree education is a privilege. Maybe that should be…
- 739.
Capitalism is more successful than socialism
For
- Capitalism vs. Socialism has been an interesting political argument for some time now, ever since the Old Left (In America) established they favored communism, America's economy has been the tactical battlefield of Socialism and Communism. To establish my argument, I would like…
- Before we begin the debate, I would like to establish a few definitions: Socialism:Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls…
Against
- Pro has forfeited.
- mao zid zong is a commie naughty man
- 740.
The Federal Reserve should be dissolved
For
- Thank you for the debate. By the way, it isn't always a good idea to concede, even if you are already won over. By conceding the debate, you practically guarantee your loss, but if you continue debating you may end up winning. Even if you agree with what your opponent is…
- My opponent attacked one of my four main arguments. He/she then went on to bring up two benefits of the Federal reserve, and made no other attacks. The single attack on my case is a denial of the decreased value of the US dollar. My opponent cannot deny that the value of the…
Against
- I thank you for the debate my friend, and I think you have won me over :). Concession grants you this one, and I think you have changed my views :)
- Terrific arguments :) and thank you for the debate.My refutals are these...the value of the US Dollar going down 25%...I beg to differ...the value of the US dollar has gone up in some countries, it is worth more in Dubai than it is here.The Federal Reserve also insures…
- 741.
Governments should provide free food to everyone
For
- Food comes from nature, So yet it kind of does just fall out of the sky, Dosnt it. . . Im not talking about restaurant food, They can take money for it cuz they put their time into it. . Food is a natural resource dumbo
- Prices on food makes life a prison for nearly everyone on the planet. If food was made free, Financial support would hardly be necessary Putting a price on food is purely selfish, And a crime against nature, It replaces truth love and friendship with money, Where coworkers are…
Against
- Oh! Nature food. Yeah why not, If you want to pick up something off the street plants and eat it, No one will stop you and tell you to pay. You can eat it whenever you want. It's always been free, No one had put a price on it if you ever want to pick fruits off a tree or eat…
- No, Foods shouldn't be free. Do you think food comes from nowhere, You think they just fall out of the sky? There are people growing the food, Planting the seeds, Harvesting the food, Processing the food, According to statista. Com, "In 2013, There were 3. 65 million fast-food…
- 742.
Greed is the root cause of America's problems
For
- Very well, I must admit that I left that title entirely too vague, I should have said MOST, instead of all. You do bring up some very good points, however, gun control, censorship, gay marriage, and abortion are all debatable whether or not they are problems or not. I would say…
- I am here to state that every problem in America today is the direct result of greedy people. From our health care dilemma, to our education problems. Everything including immigration, energy, international affairs... every facet is based on money, and has not been resolved…
Against
- "I would say that an American problem would be defined as being a problem that every American can define as being a problem." Even though that is not a correct definition, I will use your own logic to refute your points. Immigration. Immigration does not affect every American.…
- Since your contention is that greed is the cause of EVERY problem in America today, to win I only need to point out a few problems that don't. 1) Gay Marriage: There is no money at the core of the gay marriage debate. You could say that, "well, anti-gay marriage (a.k.a.…
- 743.
Governments should redistribute wealth to reduce inequality
For
- A strong middle class is the foundation of democracy. Inequality endangers the middle class. Therefore inequality dangers democracy.
- Good luck to my opponent.
Against
- Vote for the guy with the name andbface and shizz...
- To start my case, I shall begin with the Rebuttal this time around.Rebuttal I: Pro's Case.I need not use more than one rebuttal because Pro didn't state a case. his claim is begging the question...P1) Middle Class is important for Democracy.P2) Inequality hurts the Middle…
- 744.
The federal minimum wage should be raised to at least $15 per hour
For
- Extend All
- Extend all.
Against
- Rules: 1. No forfeits 2. Any citations or sources must be used within the character limit of the debate 3. No new arguments in the final round 4. Maintain a civil and decorous atmosphere 5. No trolling or semantics 6. No K's of the topic 7. My opponent accepts all of the…
- 745.
Employers should hire the most experienced, qualified candidate
For
- My opponent has again failed to address any of my points, or to make any of his own which disprove them. My opponent also does not seem to understand how things work in the UK, and so probably shouldn't comment on it. As there is nothing for me to answer here which my opponent…
- My opponent has failed to make a case for his side of the debate (Con / Against the idea). As such, Con forfeits the chance to do so, as this round is for rebuttals only, and the final round for conclusions. In response to my case, my opponent states only one objection, despite…
Against
- The fact is you expect there to be a group of people employed by government to judge whether or not people are employed fairly. Who will pay all the judges? You sir are very naive. Government employees are paid by the loot they collect from the taxpayers, are they not? HOW WILL…
- So you are supporting the UK's version of indentured servitude based on citizenship? All taxpayers are slaves to the institution as long as they support the further enslavery of the populace is what I get from your comments.
- 746.
Prioritise eliminating the budget deficit over increasing domestic spending
For
- Paying off national debt via austerity measures would free-up money used for interest payments
- Many of the reasons for operating a debt have now been eliminated
Against
- The US should focus on divising ways in which to pay the medicare and medicaid bills faced by its population
- Nobody is going to risk financial instability in the US by calling in the principle sum on the loans that it has taken out
- 747.
Taxing the rich would benefit the economy
For
- Obviously, due to my forfeit and my opponent's two forfeits, the nature of this debate was altered from the format that Con laid out in round 1. We never fully addressed the second position argument, and never had a round solely confined to rebuttal. With that said, we both got…
- Since Both my opponent and I have forfeited, it seems best that I will further argue my first argument in this round, while attempted to refute my opponents as well. Since both my argument and my opponents are somewhat similar (though arguing opposite ends), and we will have no…
Against
- Kudos to my opponent for providing a well thought out debate! Just to clarify to the voters, my opponents "Introduction" which states what he is arguing is suitable and will be the topic of judgment. First Argument: Taxing the rich ($250,000+) reduces job creation and company…
- Finally! Thank you for accepting! In this debate I will show how increasing the wealthy's tax rates will hurt the U.S economy. First argument: Taxing the super rich ($250,000+) reduces job creation and company expansion. It is the wealthy, who primarily create jobs and provide…
- 748.
The wage gap between men and women is exaggerated
For
- I am a firm believer that the so called "wage gap" between men and women is highly exaggerated based on the fact that men and women are inherently different and make different decisions career wise which effects how much money we make in a life time. Studies have shown some…
Against
- Opponent has FF again, please cote CON based on my R1 arguments.
- As in R1 I have turned PRO's argument and shown that even by his own (unsupported and unsourced) estimates the wage gap between men and women is not exaggerated but rather underestimated, I feel there is not much more to add due to the FF.Hopefully my opponent posts in R3 and…
- 749.
Bush-era tax cuts for the top 2% should expire
For
- As we enter into this final round, the fundamental disagreements in our views are starting to be made clear. For this final round I will focus on these disagreements as opposed to individual rebuttals.Scope of this debate"Pro is asking for an alternative solution, but with all…
- I'd like to start by clarifying my position in response to Con's opening statement. I do not advocate for raising taxes for the purpose of giving government more money to spend. As we all know the US faces a massive annual deficit of 1.5 trillion and a national debt of over 14…
Against
- Scope of DebatePro's opening statement, "My opponent will argue that we should make the current tax rates permanent or even a more drastic solution in that direction if he/she sees fit. "It's clear by pro's statement, that my burden of proof does not include providing a better…
- I do not advocate for raising taxes for the purpose of giving government more money to spend. As we all know the US faces a massive annual deficit of 1.5 trillion and a national debt of over 14 trillion. "I understand pro's point here, the problem is this. We don't know what…
- 750.
Taxes are the best way to lower the national debt
For
- Now I would like to address my opponents summary of the debate. Realize that nothing new was stated in the summary. My opponent simply restated their main point. Now, I will address it again. My two rebuttals were that A) The government doesn't own most of this land, and B)…
- First, I would like to rebut my opponents case in more detail. Contention 1- the national debt has no impact a) Economic interdependence There are 2 big flaws in this argument First, although economic interdependence is a real thing, it exists in waves. For example, If I owe 9…
Against
- Thank you so much for the debate. Remember in you discion remember that we sell the land do not tax it. Also remember that the US has said that they save saving the land. (explicitly said in 2 round). This means that we have saved 128 trillion dollars in oil. Please remember…
- In this debate I only have to prove one thing. That there is a better way to lower debt. My opponent has persistently has said that we tax the oil. The whole point of having untapped resources is to be able to sell them. My solution is not to tax the oil but to sell the…
How to use these debate topics
- Vote, discuss, revote. Poll the room on the motion, give 5 minutes of discussion, then vote again and look at who changed their mind.
- Four corners. Label corners strongly agree → strongly disagree; people move, then each corner makes its best case.
- Switch sides. Halfway through, everyone argues the side they disagree with. It sharpens listening.
Run them live
Want every person to answer on their own phone, with a timer and a live leaderboard? Use these questions in an EngageSlide Vote · Discuss · Revote — free to start.
Tick questions on any page — your set is kept while you browse (or take the first 10 here) — and they become ready-to-play slides. What is EngageSlide?